DOCSLIB.ORG

New Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

New nuclear power plant construction project Overall description This is an overall description of the Fennovoima nuclear power plant project as required in section 13 of the Nuclear Energy Act, inspected and approved by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy. It is to be distributed to households and municipal offices in the following municipalities: Alavieska, Artjärvi, Askola, Ii, Kalajoki, Kemi, Keminmaa, Kotka; Elimäki and Anjalankoski (now merged with the town of Kouvola), Lapinjärvi, Liljendal, Loviisa, Merijärvi, Myrskylä, Oulainen, Pernaja, Porvoo, Pyhtää, Pyhäjoki, Raahe, Ranua, Ruotsinpyhtää, Siikajoki, Simo, Tervola, Tornio, Vihanti, Ylivieska. Copies of this overall description may be ordered from Fennovoima ([email protected]). There is an online version available at the Fennovoima website (fennovoima.fi). Contents Statement by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy on the overall description ......................................................................................... 3 Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 Fennovoima......................................................................................................................6 General signifi cance and necessity of the Fennovoima nuclear power plant project .................................................................................................... 8 Project implementation .................................................................................................14 Environment ................................................................................................................... 16 Alternative sites for the nuclear power plant ..............................................................18 Technology .....................................................................................................................20 Nuclear fuel and nuclear waste management ............................................................ 21 Safety .............................................................................................................................. 22 Public hearing and contact information ...................................................................... 23 Frequently asked questions What will be the benefi ts of the nuclear power plant to Finland and to the community where it is located? pp. 11-12 How will the site be selected? p. 18 Where will the spent nuclear fuel be stored? p. 21 How will the safety of the nuclear power plant be ensured? p. 22 How can citizens infl uence the project? p. 23 This publication is the overall description of the Fennovoima nuclear power plant pro- ject required in section 13 of the Nuclear Energy Act. It is based on the application for a decision-in-principle submitted by Fennovoima and has been inspected and appro- ved by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy. The application process, submitting of opinions and timetable are detailed on the last page. The Fennovoima application is available in Finnish, Swedish and English at the company website (fennovoima.fi ). 2 Foreword Dear reader, In January 2009, Fennovoima submitted an appli- We have local offi ces in Pyhäjoki, Ruotsinpyhtää cation for a decision-in-principle for the construc- and Simo. We warmly welcome all local residents tion of a new nuclear power plant to the Finnish to visit our offi ces to fi nd out more about Fen- Government. A decision is expected in 2010. novoima. Contact information is given in this publication. The alternative sites for the new power plant are in Pyhäjoki, Ruotsinpyhtää and Simo. Until the Fennovoima’s shareholders are 63 Finnish busi- fi nal selection is made, Fennovoima will continue nesses and power companies, and E.ON Nordic. preparing the project in all three municipalities. Dialogue with local residents is a key factor. Fen- Fennovoima shareholders need the electricity that novoima has held several public briefi ngs in all the new power plant will produce to safeguard three municipalities. The formal public hearings their operating potential and the jobs they provide of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in Finland. At the moment, they are not self-suffi - regarding the application will be held in May. cient and have to buy electricity on the open mar- ket. Fennovoima will increase competition on the This overall description of the Fennovoima proj- Finnish electricity market, which will ultimately ect, distributed to households in and around the benefi t all Finnish consumers. relevant municipalities, forms part of the public hearing process. It explains how the application Fennovoima will bring jobs and vitality for de- progresses, how and at what point citizens can cades to the municipality eventually selected. The participate in the process, and where further in- tax revenue generated will benefi t the entire area. formation is available. Information is available from the Ministry of Employment and Economy I hope this publication addresses any questions (TEM), the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Author- you may have. If you want to know more, do not ity (STUK) and Fennovoima. The application for hesitate to contact us. a decision-in-principle and the environmental im- pact assessment report are available in full at our Respectfully yours, website. Tapio Saarenpää CEO Fennovoima Oy 4 Introduction Fennovoima Oy has submitted an application Please quote the registration number for a Government decision-in-principle concern- 49/815/2009 and give the name and contact ing the construction of a new nuclear power details of the person or corporation submitting plant in Finland. the opinion. There are three alternative sites for the Nuclear The Government will decide whether the Fen- Power Plant: Hanhikivi in Pyhäjoki, Gäddbergsö novoima project is in the overall interests of in Ruotsinpyhtää and Karsikko in Simo. One of society. Approval of the application requires these sites will be selected for the project. The a favorable statement from the municipality plant to be constructed will have a rated output in which the plant is to be constructed. Also, of 1,500 to 2,500 MW and will consist of one a preliminary statement that the project can Simo or two light-water reactor nuclear power plant be safely implemented is required from STUK. Pyhäjoki units. Electricity production should begin by If the Government approves the application, 2020. The planned service life of the plant is 60 the decision-in-principle will be submitted to years. Parliament, which may approve or reject it. Fennovoima submitted its application to the This publication is the overall description of Ministry of Employment and the Economy in the Fennovoima nuclear power plant project January 2009. The Ministry is obtaining state- required by the Nuclear Energy Act. It is based Ruotsinpyhtää ments from other ministries, authorities and the on the application for a decision-in-principle relevant municipalities. Citizens and corpora- submitted by Fennovoima and has been inspect- tions may submit their opinions to the Ministry ed and approved by the Ministry of Employ- Alternative sites for the in writing. The Ministry will also be holding for- ment and the Economy. Fennovoima nuclear power mal public hearings in the three relevant munic- plant. ipalities this spring (see p. 23). Written opinions The Fennovoima application is available in on the application should be submitted by post Finnish, Swedish and English at the company by June 15, 2009 to the Ministry of Employment website (fennovoima.fi ). Related documents are and the Economy, PO Box 23, 00023 Valtioneu- also available at the Ministry website (tem.fi ). vosto, or by e-mail to kuuleminen@tem.fi . 5 Fennovoima A new Finnish nuclear power company Fennovoima is a Finnish company founded in Its parent company is Voimaosakeyhtiö SF, 2007. Its purpose is to construct a new nuclear which owns 66% of its shares. E.ON Nordic has power plant in Finland. Its shareholders will a 34% holding. The owners of Voimaosakeyhtiö be entitled to the electricity it produces at cost SF are trade and industry companies operating price, in proportion to their holdings. The in Finland such as Boliden, Kesko, Outokumpu, shareholders will also fi nance the project and Ovako, Rautaruukki and SOK, and local energy cover its costs in similar proportion. Fenno- companies such as Imatran Seudun Sähkö, voima will not aim to generate profi ts. Jyväskylän Energia, Kuopion Energia, Lahti Energia, Turku Energia and Vantaan Energia. Sectors in which Fennovoima shareholders operate: Food industry Chemical industry Energy industry Metal industry Trade and services Construction material industry Registered offices of the energy company shareholders 6 55% 45% Ownership structure of Fennovoima Regional and local Finnish industrial, energy companies retail and service enterprises 66% 34% Voimaosakeyhtiö SF E.ON Nordic Fennovoima has 64 shareholders AGA Kotkan Energia Porvoon Energia Alajärven Sähkö Kruunupyyn Sähkölaitos Rantakairan Sähkö Atria KSS Energia Rauman Energia Boliden Harjavalta Kuopion Energia Rautaruukki Boliden Kokkola Kuoreveden Sähkö Rovakairan Tuotanto Componenta Köyliön-Säkylän Sähkö Sallila Energia E.ON Nordic Lahti Energia Seinäjoen Energia Esse Elektro-Kraft Lankosken Sähkö SOK Etelä-Savon Energia Lehtimäen Sähkö Tammisaaren Energia Finnfoam Leppäkosken
Recommended publications
  • Population Structure 2009

    Population Structure 2009

    Population 2010 Population Structure 2009 Number of persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population lowest in over 100 years According to Statistics Finland’s statistics on the population structure there were 888,323 persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population at the end of 2009. The number is the lowest since 1895. The size of the population under the age of 15 has been decreasing continuously since 1994. At the end of 1977, there were still one million persons aged under 15 in the Finnish population. The size of the population under the age of 15 was at its largest in 1959 when it was 1.35 million. Number of persons aged under 15 in Finland’s population in 1875–2009 On 31 December 2009, the total population of Finland was 5,351,427 in which 2,625,067 were men and 2,726,360 women. In the course of 2009, Finland’s population grew by 25,113 persons. For the third successive year migration gain from abroad contributed more to the increase of population than natural growth. During 2009, the number of persons aged 65 and over in the population increased by good 18,000 and totalled 910,441 at the end of 2009. The largest age cohort in Finland’s population was persons born in 1948. At the end of 2009, they numbered 82,738. Persons over 100 years of age numbered 566, of whom 82 were men and 484 women. Demographic dependency ratio highest in Etelä-Savo and lowest in Uusimaa The demographic dependency ratio, that is the number of under 15 and over 65-year-olds per 100 working age persons was 50.6 at the end of 2009.
  • Finland 242 Finland Finland

    Finland 242 Finland Finland

    FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average.
  • Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience

    Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience

    6th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small • Dubr°Vr HR0600024 Nuclear Option in Electricity Production - Finnish Experience Antti Piirto TVO Nuclear Services Ltd 27160 Olkiluoto, Finland [email protected] Nuclear energy has played a key role in Finnish electricity production since the beginning of the 1980s. The load factors of nuclear power plants have been high, radioactive emissions low and the price of nuclear electricity competitive. In addition, detailed plans exist for the final disposal of nuclear waste as well as for the financing of final disposal, and the implementation of final disposal has already been started with the authorities regulating nuclear waste management arrangements at all levels. Deregulation of the electricity market has meant increasing trade and co-operation, with both the other Nordic countries and the other EU Member States. In May 2002, the Finnish Parliament approved the application for a decision in principle on the construction of the fifth nuclear power plant unit in Finland. In December 2003, Teollisuuden Voima Oy concluded an agreement for the supply of the new nuclear power plant unit with a consortium formed by the French- German Framatome ANP and the German Siemens. The new unit, which will be built at Olkiluoto, is a pressurised water reactor having a net electrical output of about 1600 MW. The total value of the project is ca. 3 billion Euros, including investments connected with the development of infrastructure and waste management. The objective is to connect the new unit to the national grid in 2009. When in operation, the unit will increase the share of nuclear energy of Finnish electricity consumption, currently some 26%, to a little more than one third, and decrease Finnish carbon dioxide emissions by more than 10%.
  • Julkaisusarjan Nimi

    Julkaisusarjan Nimi

    Working papers of the Finnish Game and Fisheries Institute 25/2013 Genetic structure of Finnish and Russian sea trout populations in the Gulf of Finland area Marja-Liisa Koljonen, Aki Janatuinen, Ari Saura and Jarmo Koskiniemi M A S U R O - S A O U Finnish-Russian border rivers N R I o A r u F i p an i l k ka Bay of Vyborg k k O o o A j u o K S j RU o 32 ki a r jo l i Ino i 29 25 Rakkolanjoki FIN-RUS AO V V 1 4 The Karelian Isthmus 23 Santajoki FIN-RUS AO 2 2 27 Kilpeenjoki FIN-RUS AO 28 Notkopuro RUS AO 26 Mustajoki Kananoja 2006 FIN-RUS AO 30 Pikkuvammeljoki RUS AO 26 Mustajoki FIN-RUS AO 22 Urpalanjoki FIN-RUS AO 31 Vammeljoki RUS AO 11 Siuntionjoki AO 33 Rajajoki RUS AO 9 Karjaanjoki Mustionjoki AO 34 Luga RUS AO O njoki A 3 Purila i AO lanjok Uske 5 oki AO Uskelanjoki mionj O 10 Ingarskilanjoki AO 2 Pai oki A rniönj group oki Pe skonj 18 Koskenkylanjoki AI 7 Ki joki AI skarsin 8 Fi 15 Sipoonjoki AO M koski A 12 Mankinjoki AO rtanon Latoka AI 14 Vantaanjoki Lower reaches AI njoki joki Kisko ura 7 1 A 14 Vantaanjoki Middle reaches AI AM oki 1 Aurajoki onj 2 9 K po 0 S ym Es u ijo hatchery group 13 mm ki A an I Ingarskilanjoki jok i M Isojoki ai group n s tre hatchery group am AI The content of the publication reflects the authors views and the Managing Authority cannot be held liable for the information published by the project partners.
  • Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe

    Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe

    Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy www.psocommons.org/rhcpp Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 3 (2010) Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe Robert Darst, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Jane I. Dawson, Connecticut College Abstract This article focuses on the growing prospects for a nuclear power renaissance in Europe. While accepting the conventional wisdom that the incipient renaissance is being driven by climate change and energy security concerns, we argue that it would not be possible without the pioneering work of Sweden and Finland in providing a technological and sociopolitical solution to the industry’s longstanding “Achilles’ heel”: the safe, permanent, and locally acceptable disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In this article, we track the long decline and sudden resurgence of nuclear power in Europe, examining the correlation between the fortunes of the industry and the emergence of the Swedish model for addressing the nuclear waste problem. Through an in-depth exploration of the evolution of the siting model initiated in Sweden and adopted and successfully implemented in Finland, we emphasize the importance of transparency, trust, volunteerism, and “nuclear oases”: locations already host to substantial nuclear facilities. Climate change and concerns about energy independence and security have all opened the door for a revival of nuclear power in Europe and elsewhere, but we argue that without the solution to the nuclear waste quandary pioneered by Sweden and Finland, the industry would still be waiting for the nuclear renaissance. Keywords: high-level radioactive waste, permanent nuclear waste disposal, nuclear power in Europe, nuclear politics in Finland and Sweden © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 49 - Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol.
  • LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021

    LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021

    Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume 15, 2007

    FEEFHS Journal Volume 15, 2007

    FEEFHS Journal Volume 15, 2007 FEEFHS Journal Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? The Federation of East European Family History Societies Guest Editor: Kahlile B. Mehr. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group of Managing Editor: Thomas K. Edlund American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, religious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven societies FEEFHS Executive Council had accepted its concept as founding members. Each year since then FEEFHS has grown in size. FEEFHS now represents nearly two 2006-2007 FEEFHS officers: hundred organizations as members from twenty-four states, five Ca- President: Dave Obee, 4687 Falaise Drive, Victoria, BC V8Y 1B4 nadian provinces, and fourteen countries. It continues to grow. Canada. [email protected] About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi- 1st Vice-president: Brian J. Lenius. [email protected] purpose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 2nd Vice-president: Lisa A. Alzo ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, online services, insti- 3rd Vice-president: Werner Zoglauer tutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and other Secretary: Kahlile Mehr, 412 South 400 West, Centerville, UT. ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes organiza- [email protected] tions representing all East or Central European groups that have ex- Treasurer: Don Semon. [email protected] isting genealogy societies in North America and a growing group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from novices to Other members of the FEEFHS Executive Council: professionals. Founding Past President: Charles M. Hall, 4874 S. 1710 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84117-5928 Goals and Purposes: Immediate Past President: Irmgard Hein Ellingson, P.O.
  • Nylands Svenska Lantbruksproducentförbund

    Nylands Svenska Lantbruksproducentförbund

    Nylands svenska producentförbund NSP r.f. Publikation nr 93 ÅRSBERÄTTELSE 2017 SLC Nyland 2 DET NITTIOTREDJE VERKSAMHETSÅRET Förbundets medlemmar Antalet lokalavdelningar som var anslutna till förbundet minskade vid ingången av året från 19 till 17, då Karis och Snappertuna lokalavdelningar samt Pojo landsbygdsförening gick samman till en lokalavdelning, SLC Raseborg. Det betydde samtidigt att antalet medlemsföreningar i form av landsbygdsföreningar minskade från tre till två. Lokalavdelningarna hade vid slutet av år 2017 sammanlagt 1.383 lantbruks- och trädgårdslägenheter som medlemmar (aktiva). Dessa minskade med 1,1 procent från föregående år. Förbundet hade 316 stödande medlemmar (+ 0,3 %). Personmedlemmarnas antal uppgick till 3.149 (- 2,1 %). Medlemsgårdarnas sammanlagda areal utgjorde 59.045 ha åker (- 2,5 %) och 74.488 ha skog (- 0,4 %). Medlemsgårdarnas medelareal uppgick till 42,7 ha åker (+ 0,4 ha jmf. med 2016) och 53,9 ha skog (+ 0,5 ha). 307 lägenheter hade enbart skog. Om man beaktar endast aktiva gårdar som hade åkermark i besittning blir åkerns medelareal ca 12,2 hektar större, d.v.s. 54,9 ha. Det här motsvarar rätt väl medelarealen för lantbruken i Nyland. Stödande företagsmedlemmar Följande företag och organisationer var stödande medlemmar 2017: Andelsmejeriet Länsi Maito Andelsmejeriet Tuottajain Maito Arla Oy LSO Andelslag Svenska Småbruk och Egna Hem Södra skogsreviret Folksam skadeförsäkring FÖRBUNDETS ORGANISATION 2017 Förbundsstyrelsen Förbundsordförande och ordförande i styrelsen sedan 2004, Thomas Blomqvist. Adress: Bonäsvägen 100 C, 10520 TENALA, tel. 050 5121776, e-post: [email protected]. I viceordförande Thomas Antas, ledamot i styrelsen sedan 2002, viceordförande sedan 2015. Adress: Hindersbyvägen 622, 07850 HINDERSBY, tel. 050 3079919, e-post: [email protected].
  • Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response

    Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response

    HOST NATION SUPPORT GUIDELINES Finland’s legal preparedness for international disaster response – Host Nation Support Guidelines Finnish Red Cross 2014 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 The report is part of the project titled ”Implementation of the EU Host Nation Support Guidelines”, (ECHO/SUB/2012/638451) The project is funded by the Civil Protection Financial Instrument of the European Union for 2013– 2014, provided by the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO) Author: Maarit Pimiä, Bachelor of Laws Mandators: The Finnish Red Cross, National Preparedness Unit The Department of Rescue Services of the Ministry of the Interior Translated by: Semantix Finland Oy Date: 14.3.2014 © Finnish Red Cross The European Commission is not responsible for the content of this report or the views expressed in this report. The authors are responsible for the content. 2 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background of the report .....................................................................................
  • Free Travel Guide Visitloviisa.Fi

    Free Travel Guide Visitloviisa.Fi

    ENGLISH Loviisa Free travel guide visitloviisa.fi 2019 1 2 The Coastal Loviisa is the best small town in Finland! Loviisa, founded in 1745, has an interesting history. The town features fabulous town architecture, an inviting guest harbour and a unique feeling created by historical buildings, blooming gardens and a compact town centre. Pictorial countryside, beautiful archipelago, old Strömfors Iron Works milieu and versatile outdoor life opportunities will optimise your visit. And of course the children will also enjoy themselves in this home town of children’s Jill and Joy (Onneli and Anneli) movies. All this you can find along the E18 highway, less than an hour’s drive from Helsinki and within easy reach from Porvoo, Kotka and Kouvola. The Loviisa-dwellers are the friendliest along the south coast of Finland, wishing their guests warmly welcome. Free Welcome to Loviisa! parking! visitloviisa.fi CONTENTS Sights p. 4 • Events p. 10 • Nature & Activities p. 16 • Shopping p. 18 • Eat & Drink p. 20 • Accommodation p. 23 • Services & Service catalogue p. 24 ”Come here! There are superb What facilities for Relaxed atmosphere canoeing chances outdoor life! Hiking, and nice people. in Loviisa: you can biking, canoeing … #plagen #beachlife paddle even with your you name it … in an epic #happy #holiday head down below the old iron works milieu! surface! When will #eventhedoglikesit you join us? #strömforsironworks #realmenusecanoes 3 Just like in the old times! Wooden houses & cobblestone streets The historical lower part of town by the seaside is one of the most uniform 18th century wooden town sections in Finland. Cobblestones, sandy alleys, sheltered courtyards and bright-coloured facades make you smile.
  • Jaakko Helminen Finnish Meteorological Institute PO Box 503

    Jaakko Helminen Finnish Meteorological Institute PO Box 503

    FINNISH LOCAL V IEW ON THE FACTORS ACCOUNTING FOR THE COSTS OF W EATHER-RELATED DISASTERS (SPECIFICALLY, FLOODS AND STORMS) IN RECENT DECADES AND IMPLICATIONS OF UNDERSTANDING THESE FOR BOTH RESEARCH AND POLICY Jaakko Helminen Finnish Meteorological Institute P.O. Box 503 FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland email: [email protected] 1. Introduction s the factors accounting for the costs of weather-related disasters (specifically, floods and storms) in recent decades and the implications of understanding these for both research and policy are considered in the Finnish context. The climatology of the pertinent weather phenomena are discussed also with some A outlook to the scenarios. Here some possible future shifts in both flood and storm types causing damages and losses are pointed out. In addition some policy issues are discussed as this seems to be another pertinent point. 2. Factors in weather-related disasters 2.1 Floods Since 1960 (Puupponen, 2006) in terms of house damage costs the three most severe flood episodes in Finland have occurred as follows. Spring 1966 – Southern Finland: This spring flood has been since 1969 the highest flood in the rivers of Southern Finland. The water equivalent of the snow at the beginning of April was still widely 200 – 250 mm which was roughly double compared with the normal value and in fact a record value. The melting of the snow was postponed to a late time point around 1 May. Consequently the recurrence value of the observed flood flows exceeded in several drainage basins 100 years in terms of a Gumbel distribution estimate. No exact damage data are available, but in relation to later damage inventories the probable cost level has been of the order of 10 million euros.
  • The Impact of the Establishment of Loviisa - Kunda Ferry Connection in Activating the Eastern Finland - Estonia Transport Corridor

    The Impact of the Establishment of Loviisa - Kunda Ferry Connection in Activating the Eastern Finland - Estonia Transport Corridor

    MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA TURUN YLIOPISTON BRAHEA-KESKUS PUBLICATIONS OF THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES BRAHEA CENTRE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 77 2020 THE IMPACT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LOVIISA - KUNDA FERRY CONNECTION IN ACTIVATING THE EASTERN FINLAND - ESTONIA TRANSPORT CORRIDOR Reima Helminen, Riitta Pöntynen, Minna Alhosalo, Aado Keskpaik & Rivo Noorkõiv MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA TURUN YLIOPISTON BRAHEA-KESKUS PUBLIKATIONER AV SJÖFARTSBRANSCHENS UTBILDNINGS- OCH FORSKNINGSCENTRAL BRAHEA CENTRUM VID ÅBO UNIVERSITET PUBLICATIONS OF THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES BRAHEA CENTRE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 77 2020 THE IMPACT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LOVIISA - KUNDA FERRY CONNECTION IN ACTIVATING THE EASTERN FINLAND - ESTONIA TRANSPORT CORRIDOR Reima Helminen, Riitta Pöntynen, Minna Alhosalo, Aado Keskpaik & Rivo Noorkõiv Turku 2020 JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER: Turun yliopiston Brahea-keskus / Brahea Centre at the University of Turku MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUS CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES Käyntiosoite / Visiting address: ICT-City, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 B, 5.krs, Turku Postiosoite / Postal address: FI-20014 TURUN YLIOPISTO Puh. / Tel. +358 (0)2 333 51 http://utu.fi/mkk ISBN 978-951-29-8193-9 (PDF) ISSN 2342–141X (PDF) FOREWORD Since the early 1990’s European Union has been promoting a multimodal transport corridor policy known as TEN-T policy. Corridor policy approaches have been adopted also on regional cross-border programmes to improve connectivity. This report has been made as a part of Reinforcing Eastern Finland-Estonia Transport Corridor (REFEC), which is an ERDF funded project under the Interreg Central Baltic Programme 2014–2020 in the priority Well-connected region. The REFEC project supports the transport corridor by mapping the cargo potential and impact of the activated corridor, and most importantly, conducting different concrete activities that aim to remove obstacles in the establishment of the Loviisa-Kunda roro connection.