DOCSLIB.ORG

Half a Century of Nordic Nuclear Co-Operation. an Insider's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Half a Century of Nordic Nuclear Co-Operation. an Insider's HalfHalf aa CenturyCentury ofof NordicNordic NuclearNuclear Co-operationCo-operation An Insider’s Recollections November 1997 • Franz R. Marcus Half a Century of NORDIC NUCLEAR CO-OPERATION An Insider’s Recollections November 1997 Printed by Nordgraf A/S, Copenhagen. This book is available from the NKS secretariat Building 100, P.O.B. 49 DK-4000 Roskilde Tel: (+45) 4677 4045 Fax: (+45) 4635 9273 e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 87-7893-018-9 Half a Century of NORDIC NUCLEAR CO-OPERATION An Insider’s Recollections The author taking up his job as a Nordic employee in 1967 List of contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 2 NORDIC NAMES, TRANSLATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................... 4 SUMMARY................................................................................................. 7 1. THE EARLY DAYS, UP TO 1957 ........................................................ 31 1.1 The international background ................................................................................. 31 1.2 Early developments in the Nordic countries............................................................ 32 1.3 Early Nordic co-operation....................................................................................... 35 A Nordic Council for Atomic Energy ........................................................................ 37 2. FIRST FORMAL CO-OPERATION: 1957-1967.................................. 39 2.1 Creation of the Kontaktorgan ................................................................................. 39 2.2 The Kontaktorgan and European ventures .............................................................. 40 2.3 Co-operation in radiation protection ....................................................................... 42 2.4 The Kontaktorgan and joint Nordic activities ......................................................... 45 Isotopes ..................................................................................................................... 45 Reprocessing ............................................................................................................. 46 Heavy water............................................................................................................... 46 Reactor physics ......................................................................................................... 47 Reactor technology.................................................................................................... 47 Mutual assistance ...................................................................................................... 49 NORDEL................................................................................................................... 50 Industrial projects...................................................................................................... 50 Time for new initiatives............................................................................................. 51 3. INTENSIFIED CO-OPERATION FROM 1967 ..................................... 53 3.1 Background in the Nordic countries........................................................................ 53 3.2 Investigations leading to the Committee and NARS................................................. 57 Large projects related to nuclear technology.............................................................. 58 Advanced reactors ..................................................................................................... 58 Other initiatives......................................................................................................... 59 Conclusions of the NA investigation .......................................................................... 60 The creation of NAK, the Committee......................................................................... 60 3.3 Attempts for unification. NORDEK........................................................................ 61 3.4 The Committee (Nordiska Atomkoordineringskomittén, NAK)............................... 66 Organisation .............................................................................................................. 66 Isotopes ..................................................................................................................... 67 Reactor core calculations........................................................................................... 67 Concrete reactor tank................................................................................................. 69 Other activities .......................................................................................................... 70 Safety aspects ............................................................................................................ 72 The Marviken experiments ........................................................................................ 74 Environmental impact................................................................................................ 76 3.5 Co-operation among safety authorities.................................................................... 78 The Nordic working group on reactor safety, NARS .................................................. 81 Reactors near frontiers. The Barsebäck case.............................................................. 83 3.6 Electricity producers, NORDEL ............................................................................. 85 3.7 Documentation........................................................................................................ 87 3.8 Continued contacts through the Kontaktorgan ........................................................ 88 IAEA and safeguards................................................................................................. 89 Nuclear Energy Agency and Euratom........................................................................ 90 Relations to the Nordic Council................................................................................. 90 Development in the Nordic countries up to 1973....................................................... 91 4. THE ENERGY CRISIS 1973 AND THE START OF NKS ....................93 4.1 The Ministers’ reactions on the first energy crisis................................................... 93 4.2 Effects on the Kontaktorgan and the Committee ..................................................... 94 The Kontaktorgan ..................................................................................................... 94 The research institutes ............................................................................................... 95 More nuclear power?................................................................................................. 98 Opposition to nuclear power...................................................................................... 99 Nuclear societies ..................................................................................................... 100 Materials properties................................................................................................. 101 Waste ...................................................................................................................... 102 4.3 Preparations for a nuclear safety research programme .......................................... 104 4.4 The First NKS programme 1977-80...................................................................... 107 Quality assurance (QA) ........................................................................................... 109 Waste management (AO)......................................................................................... 109 Control room design (KRU) .................................................................................... 110 Authority related projects (MY) .............................................................................. 111 Radioecology (RA).................................................................................................. 112 End of the First NKS programme ............................................................................ 113 5. CHANGING CONDITIONS FOR CO-OPERATION........................... 117 5.1 The research institutes .......................................................................................... 117 Reorganisation of the Committee work .................................................................... 117 Energy research ....................................................................................................... 119 Safety related work.................................................................................................. 121 Diversification from nuclear research...................................................................... 122 5.2 The Kontaktorgan................................................................................................. 123 Kontaktorgan or Officials? ...................................................................................... 125 Safety authorities and Kontaktorgan........................................................................ 127 5.3 Waste: reprocessing or direct disposal.................................................................. 129 5.4 Changed relations between the research institutes................................................. 132 The end of the Committee.......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finland 242 Finland Finland
    FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience
    6th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small • Dubr°Vr HR0600024 Nuclear Option in Electricity Production - Finnish Experience Antti Piirto TVO Nuclear Services Ltd 27160 Olkiluoto, Finland [email protected] Nuclear energy has played a key role in Finnish electricity production since the beginning of the 1980s. The load factors of nuclear power plants have been high, radioactive emissions low and the price of nuclear electricity competitive. In addition, detailed plans exist for the final disposal of nuclear waste as well as for the financing of final disposal, and the implementation of final disposal has already been started with the authorities regulating nuclear waste management arrangements at all levels. Deregulation of the electricity market has meant increasing trade and co-operation, with both the other Nordic countries and the other EU Member States. In May 2002, the Finnish Parliament approved the application for a decision in principle on the construction of the fifth nuclear power plant unit in Finland. In December 2003, Teollisuuden Voima Oy concluded an agreement for the supply of the new nuclear power plant unit with a consortium formed by the French- German Framatome ANP and the German Siemens. The new unit, which will be built at Olkiluoto, is a pressurised water reactor having a net electrical output of about 1600 MW. The total value of the project is ca. 3 billion Euros, including investments connected with the development of infrastructure and waste management. The objective is to connect the new unit to the national grid in 2009. When in operation, the unit will increase the share of nuclear energy of Finnish electricity consumption, currently some 26%, to a little more than one third, and decrease Finnish carbon dioxide emissions by more than 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Europe
    torbiorn.cov 8/9/03 2:42 pm Page 1 DESTINATION DESTINATION via free access interprets and interrelates DESTINATION EUROPE Kjell M. Torbiörn - 9781526137319 EUROPEthe major political, economic and security developments in Europe – including transatlantic relations – from the end of the Second The political and World War up until the present time, and looks ahead to how the continent may evolve in the future. economic growth The book fills a definite lacuna in the current literature on Europe, as most studies cover only specific aspects, such as the European of a continent Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/27/2021 06:53:03AM Union. Destination Europe by contrast weaves all the different strands of European events together into a single overall and up-to-date picture and gives the reader a deeper understanding KJELL M.TORBIÖRN of the continent and its current and future challenges. The first chapters trace European reconstruction and political, EUROPE economic and security developments – both in the East and in the West – leading up to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Later chapters examine the European Union’s reform efforts, enlargement, movement to a single currency and emerging security role; the political and economic changes in central and eastern Europe, including Russia; the break-up of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued; NATO’s enlargement and search for a new mission; and the current intricate political relations between European powers, and between Europe and the US. Final chapters deal with forces affecting Europe’s future such as terrorism, nationalism, religion, demographic trends and globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe
    Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy www.psocommons.org/rhcpp Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 3 (2010) Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe Robert Darst, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Jane I. Dawson, Connecticut College Abstract This article focuses on the growing prospects for a nuclear power renaissance in Europe. While accepting the conventional wisdom that the incipient renaissance is being driven by climate change and energy security concerns, we argue that it would not be possible without the pioneering work of Sweden and Finland in providing a technological and sociopolitical solution to the industry’s longstanding “Achilles’ heel”: the safe, permanent, and locally acceptable disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In this article, we track the long decline and sudden resurgence of nuclear power in Europe, examining the correlation between the fortunes of the industry and the emergence of the Swedish model for addressing the nuclear waste problem. Through an in-depth exploration of the evolution of the siting model initiated in Sweden and adopted and successfully implemented in Finland, we emphasize the importance of transparency, trust, volunteerism, and “nuclear oases”: locations already host to substantial nuclear facilities. Climate change and concerns about energy independence and security have all opened the door for a revival of nuclear power in Europe and elsewhere, but we argue that without the solution to the nuclear waste quandary pioneered by Sweden and Finland, the industry would still be waiting for the nuclear renaissance. Keywords: high-level radioactive waste, permanent nuclear waste disposal, nuclear power in Europe, nuclear politics in Finland and Sweden © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 49 - Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Foreign and Security Policy 2020
    Proposals / Nordic Foreign and Security Policy 2020 NORDIC FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY 2020 Climate Change, Hybrid & Cyber Threats and Challenges to the Multilateral, Rules-Based World Order Proposals, July 2020 Björn Bjarnason 1 Nordic Foreign and Security Policy 2020 / Proposals INTRODUCTION On 2 December 2019, the Icelandic Minister for US outlook on the Nordic foreign and security Foreign Affairs, on behalf of the Nordic Foreign situation. We met with Nordic politicians, Ministers, tasked me to write a report on Nordic diplomats, experts, and academics in the fields Foreign and Security Policy in the same spirit of international relations, politics, climate as the one Thorvald Stoltenberg delivered in change as well as both civil and military security. February 2009. My work took into account the In short, in all our discussions, in over 80 establishment of Nordic Defence Cooperation meetings, we sensed great and sincere interest (NORDEFCO) in November 2009. in strengthening Nordic cooperation in the field of foreign and security policy. The mandate stipulated three tasks: • addressing global climate change It was of special value to visit research institutes • addressing hybrid threats and cyber issues in the Nordic capitals. These included the • strengthening and reforming multilateralism Norwegian Institute of International Affairs and the rules-based international order. (NUPI) and the Peace Research Institute in Oslo (PRIO), the Swedish Defence Research An Addendum to the report includes the Agency (FOI), the Stockholm International
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Bear Use of a Persistent Food Subsidy: Insights from Non-Invasive Genetic Sampling in Alaska
    Polar bear use of a persistent food subsidy: Insights from non-invasive genetic sampling in Alaska Jason Herreman1,3 and Elizabeth Peacock2 1North Slope Borough, Department of Wildlife Management, P.O. Box 69, Barrow, AK 99723 USA 2US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA Abstract: Remains of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) harvested by In˜upiat whalers are deposited in bone piles along the coast of Alaska and have become persistent and reliable food sources for polar bears (Ursus maritimus). The importance of bone piles to individuals and the population, the patterns of use, and the number, sex, and age of bears using these resources are poorly understood. We implemented barbed-wire hair snaring to obtain genetic identities from bears using the Point Barrow bone pile in winter 2010–11. Eighty-three percent of genotyped samples produced individual and sex identification. We identified 97 bears from 200 samples. Using genetic mark–recapture techniques, we estimated that 228 bears used the bone pile during November to February, which would represent approximately 15% of the Southern Beaufort Sea polar bear subpopulation, if all bears were from this subpopulation. We found that polar bears of all age and sex classes simultaneously used the bone pile. More males than females used the bone pile, and males predominated in February, likely because 1/3 of adult females would be denning during this period. On average, bears spent 10 days at the bone pile (median 5 5 days); the probability that an individual bear remained at the bone pile from week to week was 63% for females and 45% for males.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response
    HOST NATION SUPPORT GUIDELINES Finland’s legal preparedness for international disaster response – Host Nation Support Guidelines Finnish Red Cross 2014 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 The report is part of the project titled ”Implementation of the EU Host Nation Support Guidelines”, (ECHO/SUB/2012/638451) The project is funded by the Civil Protection Financial Instrument of the European Union for 2013– 2014, provided by the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO) Author: Maarit Pimiä, Bachelor of Laws Mandators: The Finnish Red Cross, National Preparedness Unit The Department of Rescue Services of the Ministry of the Interior Translated by: Semantix Finland Oy Date: 14.3.2014 © Finnish Red Cross The European Commission is not responsible for the content of this report or the views expressed in this report. The authors are responsible for the content. 2 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background of the report .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter Number Fourteen 2010
    Thomas Lovell Beddoes Society Woodcut of The Dance of Death, from the Nuremberg Chronicle, 1493 The Newsletter Number Fourteen 2010 Beddoes to his Critic ‘Tell the students I obsess, Tell them something’s wrong with me. That medicine will help. Impress Them with your sage psychiatry. ‘Tell them that I’m manic, that These phases alternate with gloom. When others stood for Life, I sat. Let these statements fill the room. ‘And if perhaps you find one doubt, Resist your observations, then, Let the final clincher out: Tell them that I favored men. ‘But when you’ve thus disposed of me, And kept yourself from facing death, Do not think we’re finished. See, I await your dying breath.’ Richard Geyer aris 1856 Alphabet of Death ’s , repro P Frame from Hans Holbein Editorial Welcome to Newsletter 14. It’s two years since the last issue – poor form for an annual! – but here’s evidence that something’s still astir on the Ship of Fools. Members will know that following John Beddoes’ resignation as chairman the Society is in a period of transition. The meeting on 13th March resolved that we will continue to pursue our original aim to publicise and promote the work of Thomas Lovell Beddoes. But there are still difficulties to overcome, the most urgent being to appoint a new chairman and secretary. This must be done at the AGM on 25th September (1 pm at The Devereux, 20 Devereux Court, Essex Street, The Strand, London WC2R 3JJ). We hope that by holding the meeting in London as many members as possible will be able to attend and join the discussion: the Society needs you.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Aware Checklist Because Most of Alaska Is Bear Country, We All Need to Be Aware of Bears
    Bear Aware Checklist Because most of Alaska is bear country, we all need to be aware of bears. Some of us live in neighborhoods where bears are commonly seen. In those areas, it is especially important when bears are awake (April- November) to keep garbage and other bear attractants out of reach of bears. Directions: Identify items around your home that might attract bears. If you answer “yes” to any questions below, you have some work to do! Refer to the solution sheet on the back to figure out how you can make your home and neighborhood safer. Garbage •Is there any trash outside your house, garage or shed that is not stored in a bear- □ YES □ NO resistant container? Bird Seed •Are there any bird feeders out during the months when bears are awake? Also, are □ YES □ NO there any leftover seeds on the ground? Pets and other animals •Is there any pet food stored outside where bears might get it? □ YES □ NO •Do you have any livestock on your property (chickens, ducks, goats, horses, beehives) that are not protected from bears by an electric fence? □ YES □ NO Fish •Do you have any fishy-smelling gear (nets, lines, coolers) or fish cleaning tables □ YES □ NO outside your home? •Do you keep fish waste outside your home or outside in garbage cans (non bear- resistant)? □ YES □ NO Freezers, Smokers and BBQs •Do you have any freezers outside that might provide easy access to bears? □ YES □ NO •Does your BBQ have leftover food or grease on it? □ YES □ NO •Do you leave your smoker outside unattended? □ YES □ NO Compost •Do you have a compost pile on your property that might attract bears? □ YES □ NO Created by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the Anchorage Bear Committee Bear Aware Checklist: Solution Sheet What YOU do really matters! Garbage: Secure your garbage so bears can’t get to it.
    [Show full text]
  • (Native) Bee Basics
    A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Cover Art: Upper panel: The southeastern blueberry bee Habropoda( laboriosa) visiting blossoms of Rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum). Lower panel: Female andrenid bees (Andrena cornelli) foraging for nectar on Azalea (Rhododendron canescens). A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics: An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Illustrations by Steve Buchanan A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication United States Department of Agriculture Acknowledgments Edited by Larry Stritch, Ph.D. Julie Nelson Teresa Prendusi Laurie Davies Adams Worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) visiting almond blossoms (Prunus dulcis). Introduction Native bees are a hidden treasure. From alpine meadows in the national forests of the Rocky Mountains to the Sonoran Desert in the Coronado National Forest in Arizona and from the boreal forests of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska to the Ocala National Forest in Florida, bees can be found anywhere in North America, where flowers bloom. From forests to farms, from cities to wildlands, there are 4,000 native bee species in the United States, from the tiny Perdita minima to large carpenter bees. Most people do not realize that there were no honey bees in America before European settlers brought hives from Europe. These resourceful animals promptly managed to escape from domestication. As they had done for millennia in Europe and Asia, honey bees formed swarms and set up nests in hollow trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments of Nuclear Power in Finland: Olkiluoto 3, and More…
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN FINLAND: OLKILUOTO 3, AND MORE… Jarmo Vehmas 15th REFORM Group meeting Schloss Leopoldskron, Salzburg, 10.9.2010 CONTENT 1. Olkiluoto 3: Basics 2. Olkiluoto 3: About TVO 3. Olkiluoto 3: Delays 4. Olkiluoto 3: Financing and increasing costs 5. Olkiluoto 3. Conclusions 6. Government decision-in-principle, June/July 2010 7. Fennovoima: Shareholders 8. Fennovoima: Site alternatives 9. Olkiluoto 4 and Fennovoima: Conclusions OLKILUOTO 3: BASICS • Fifth nuclear reactor in Finland, ordered by TVO, a private power company • TVO already has two units, taken into use in 1978 (OL 1) and 1982 (OL 2). State-owned Fortum has two units in Loviisa, taken into use in 1977 and 1981 • Attemps for a fifth unit were made ijointly by Fortum and TVO in mid-1980s (cancelled after Chernobyl), in early 1990s (rejected in 1993 by the Parliament), • TVO submitted the OL 3 application in 2000 and it was accepted by the Government and ratified by the Parliament in 2002. • OL 3 is a new plant design, European pressurized reactor (EPR) by AREVA, 4300/1600 MW • The construction license was granted and construction started in 2005. • Original scedule and budget: In commercial operation in 2009, turnkey contract of €3.2 bn 2. OLKILUOTO 3: ABOUT TVO • Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO), is a Finnish power company which produces electricity to its shareholders only. • According to its articles of association, TVO shareholders pay fixed costs in relation to their shares of the stock, and receive corresponding right to the produced electricity. • TVO Shareholders pay the moving cost in relation to their use of the produced electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • English Summaries
    Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja - 89. vsk. -1/1993 English Summaries VISA HEINONEN: How Did It Happen - NORDEK posed a many-faceted co-operation which was 1968-70: A Memory from the Past or a Real Alter­ supposed to cover economic policy, scientific native? and energy policy, capital movements, trade Co-operation between the Nordic countries has and customs policy, industrial policy and even a long history. In the 19th century Scandi­ agricultural policy and fishing. The Nordic navism was an intelIectual and political move­ countries aimed at fulI employment, efficient ment that stressed the common history and cul­ production and a stable extemal balance, and tural heritage of the Scandinavian countries. In growth of the standard of living without infla­ the latter decades of the century there was tion. peaceful co-operation, in the form of, for in­ In the winter of 1970 the fate of the NOR­ stance, a postal and monetary union between DEK pIan was about to be resolved. The course the Nordic countries. At that time Finland was of the general European integration develop­ stilI a Grand Duchy of the Russian empire. Af­ ment had changed when President Charles de ter W orld War I there was an unfulfilIed pIan Gaulle resigned. Soon after this especialIy for a defence union. Denmark became interested in membership in In the 1950's the Nordic co-operation pIan the EEC. In Finland the situation in the inter­ became topical and proceeded: the N ordic naI policy was confused because a parliamen­ Council was founded in 1952, the ministers of tary election was approaching.
    [Show full text]