PROSPECTS of NUCLEAR POWER in FINLAND the Following States Are Members Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geological Report on the Foriet Diamond Property, Kuusamo, Finland
National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE FORIET DIAMOND PROPERTY, KUUSAMO, FINLAND Latitude/Longitude: N66° 06’ 46.8” E29° 21’ 03.6” ETRS89 UTM: 35W 606212E 7334500N Kuusamo.vaakuna Prepared For: ARCTIC STAR EXPLORATION CORP. BY: KEVIN R. KIVI, P.GEO. KIVI Geoscience Inc. 1100 Memorial Ave, PMB 363, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 4A3, Canada Phone (807) 285-1251 Fax (807) 285-1252 [email protected] Effective Date: June 18, 2017 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE FORIET DIAMOND PROPERTY, KUUSAMO, FINLAND Cover Image: "Kuusamo.vaakuna" by Care; Original design by Kaj and Terttu Kajander. - Own work. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons CONTENTS 1. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Reliance on Other Experts ...................................................................................................................... 3 4. Property Description and Location .................................................................................................... 5 5. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography .................... 11 6. History ........................................................................................................................................................ -
The Finnish Environment Brought to You by CORE Provided by Helsingin Yliopiston445 Digitaalinen Arkisto the Finnish Eurowaternet
445 View metadata, citation and similar papersThe at core.ac.uk Finnish Environment The Finnish Environment brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston445 digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Eurowaternet ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION Jorma Niemi, Pertti Heinonen, Sari Mitikka, Heidi Vuoristo, The Finnish Eurowaternet Olli-Pekka Pietiläinen, Markku Puupponen and Esa Rönkä (Eds.) with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies The Finnish Eurowaternet The European Environment Agency (EEA) has a political mandate from with information about Finnish water resources the EU Council of Ministers to deliver objective, reliable and comparable and monitoring strategies information on the environment at a European level. In 1998 EEA published Guidelines for the implementation of the EUROWATERNET monitoring network for inland waters. In every Member Country a monitoring network should be designed according to these Guidelines and put into operation. Together these national networks will form the EUROWATERNET monitoring network that will provide information on the quantity and quality of European inland waters. In the future they will be developed to meet the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. This publication presents the Finnish EUROWATERNET monitoring network put into operation from the first of January, 2000. It includes a total of 195 river sites, 253 lake sites and 74 hydrological baseline sites. Groundwater monitoring network will be developed later. In addition, information about Finnish water resources and current monitoring strategies is given. The publication is available in the internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe445/fe445.htm ISBN 952-11-0827-4 ISSN 1238-7312 EDITA Ltd. PL 800, 00043 EDITA Tel. -
Finland 242 Finland Finland
FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average. -
Work Force Also in the Future Good Traffic Connections Good Educational Opportunities Living and Recrea
GROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION CENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Bring your business to Ylivieska, the town of growth! THE REGIONAL EXTENSIVE SUBCON- GROWTH CENTRE TRACTING NETWORK SUBSTANTIAL GOOD TRAFFIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES CONNECTIONS GOOD EDUCATIONAL WORK FORCE OPPORTUNITIES ALSO IN THE FUTURE LIVING AND RECREA- EFFICIENT TIONAL ACTIVITIES BUSINESS SERVICES GROWTHGROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION TOP CENTRECENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Ylivieska grows – truly The regional growth centre Studied growth Ylivieska has its charm. Ylivieska is an Finland has 29 functionally significant urban exceptional town amongst regional towns. regions. The amount has decreased by six The studies show that it is growing and during the last 20 years. At the same, one new developing. region has joined the group of notable urban regions: the Ylivieska region. Ylivieska has good resources for growth. It (MDI 2019: Urban Network Study) is active and energetic but also a safe ”small big town” as the centre of its neighbouring According to Statistics Finland’s projection, municipalities and as an intersection of roads the town population will be approximately and railways. 18 000 in 2040, which is 3000 more people than now, 2020. The growth projection of jobs Ylivieska works systematically to enable the is also good: the aim is that the town will have market area of up to 100 000 inhabitants to 1000 new jobs by 2030. continue growing. The growth percent of Ylivieska population by 2040 according to +18% Statistics Finland’s projection. GROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION TOP CENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Ylivieska offers great oppor- tunities for an entrepreneur in the industrial sector Growth locomotives We have a good environment for businesses. -
Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience
6th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small • Dubr°Vr HR0600024 Nuclear Option in Electricity Production - Finnish Experience Antti Piirto TVO Nuclear Services Ltd 27160 Olkiluoto, Finland [email protected] Nuclear energy has played a key role in Finnish electricity production since the beginning of the 1980s. The load factors of nuclear power plants have been high, radioactive emissions low and the price of nuclear electricity competitive. In addition, detailed plans exist for the final disposal of nuclear waste as well as for the financing of final disposal, and the implementation of final disposal has already been started with the authorities regulating nuclear waste management arrangements at all levels. Deregulation of the electricity market has meant increasing trade and co-operation, with both the other Nordic countries and the other EU Member States. In May 2002, the Finnish Parliament approved the application for a decision in principle on the construction of the fifth nuclear power plant unit in Finland. In December 2003, Teollisuuden Voima Oy concluded an agreement for the supply of the new nuclear power plant unit with a consortium formed by the French- German Framatome ANP and the German Siemens. The new unit, which will be built at Olkiluoto, is a pressurised water reactor having a net electrical output of about 1600 MW. The total value of the project is ca. 3 billion Euros, including investments connected with the development of infrastructure and waste management. The objective is to connect the new unit to the national grid in 2009. When in operation, the unit will increase the share of nuclear energy of Finnish electricity consumption, currently some 26%, to a little more than one third, and decrease Finnish carbon dioxide emissions by more than 10%. -
Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy www.psocommons.org/rhcpp Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 3 (2010) Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe Robert Darst, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Jane I. Dawson, Connecticut College Abstract This article focuses on the growing prospects for a nuclear power renaissance in Europe. While accepting the conventional wisdom that the incipient renaissance is being driven by climate change and energy security concerns, we argue that it would not be possible without the pioneering work of Sweden and Finland in providing a technological and sociopolitical solution to the industry’s longstanding “Achilles’ heel”: the safe, permanent, and locally acceptable disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In this article, we track the long decline and sudden resurgence of nuclear power in Europe, examining the correlation between the fortunes of the industry and the emergence of the Swedish model for addressing the nuclear waste problem. Through an in-depth exploration of the evolution of the siting model initiated in Sweden and adopted and successfully implemented in Finland, we emphasize the importance of transparency, trust, volunteerism, and “nuclear oases”: locations already host to substantial nuclear facilities. Climate change and concerns about energy independence and security have all opened the door for a revival of nuclear power in Europe and elsewhere, but we argue that without the solution to the nuclear waste quandary pioneered by Sweden and Finland, the industry would still be waiting for the nuclear renaissance. Keywords: high-level radioactive waste, permanent nuclear waste disposal, nuclear power in Europe, nuclear politics in Finland and Sweden © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 49 - Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol. -
Kouvola - Anjalankoski Alueelliset Indikaattorit Tiedot Pääosin Vuodelta 2017, Osa 2016, Julkaistu Tammikuussa 2019
Kouvola - Anjalankoski Alueelliset indikaattorit Tiedot pääosin vuodelta 2017, osa 2016, julkaistu tammikuussa 2019 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 1 Tietolähde • Paavo – Postinumeroalueittainen avoin tieto, Tilastokeskus • Paavo sisältää tietoja asukasrakenteesta, koulutusasteesta, asukkaiden ja talouksien tuloista, talouksien koosta ja elämänvaiheesta, rakennuksista ja asunnoista, työpaikoista sekä asukkaiden pääasiallisesta toiminnasta. • Paavo-tilastotiedot ja kartta-aineistot päivitetään vuosittain tammikuussa. • Asukkailla tarkoitetaan alueella vakinaisesti asuvaa väestöä. Ne henkilöt, joilla väestötietojärjestelmän mukaan oli kotipaikka Suomessa vuoden lopussa (31. joulukuuta), kuuluvat asukkaisiin kansalaisuudesta riippumatta. Asukkaiden sijainti määräytyy asuinrakennusten koordinaattien perusteella. • Henkilöt, jotka asuvat laitoksissa, saavat sijaintitiedot laitoksen koordinaattien mukaan, mikäli ne ovat tiedossa. Pois sen sijaan jäävät koordinaatiton laitosväestö, ulkomailla tilapäisesti asuvat Suomen kansalaiset ja henkilöt, joiden sijaintitietoa kunnassa ei tiedetä. HUOM! Tästä syystä viralliset alueittaiset väkiluvut poikkeavat PAAVO-tilastoaineiston alueittaisista summatiedoista. • Seuraavissa taulukoissa on alueen lisäksi koko Kouvolan arvo ja kaikkien alueiden (Anjalankoski, Elimäki, Jaala, Kouvola, Kuusankoski ja Valkeala) minimi ja maksimi arvo. 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 2 Anjalankosken alueen postinumeroalueet kartalla 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 3 Anjalankoski 45460 Savero, 46400 Kaipiainen, -
BUSSIAIKATAULUT Voimassa 9.8.2018 – 2.6.2019
Kouvolan BUSSIAIKATAULUT Voimassa 9.8.2018 – 2.6.2019 Päivitetty 1.3.2019 kouvolanbussit.fi | kouvola.digitransit.fi Matkakeskuksen linja-autopysäkit Pysäkiltä Pysäkiltä H1 H3 Voikkaa (1, 2) Eskolanmäki (10) Kuusankoski (1, 2, 7) Lehtomäki (11) Anjala, Inkeroinen, Myllykoski (3) Tornionmäki (12, 13) Koria (4K) Mielakka (13) Kasarminmäki (14) Laiturit 1-7 Laituri 1 Elimäki, Koria (4) Laituri 2 Utti, Kaipiainen, Sippola (8) Laituri 3 Kausala Laituri 4 Jaala (9) Laituri 5 Valkeala (5) Laituri 6 Sippola ja Liikkala Kouvolankatu tu H3 H1 Hallituskatu Asemaka Hallituskatu Matkakeskuksen Laiturit 1-7 pääovi 2 1 Juhlapyhien poikkeusliikenne Eri juhlapyhien aikaan on linja-autoliikenteessä selviä poik- keuksia normaaliin liikennöintiin. Kaukoliikenne kannattaa tarkistaa liikennöitsijöiden omilta sivuilta tai Matkahuollosta Pyhäinpäivä 3.11.2018 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS) Itsenäisyyspäivä 6.12.2018 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS) Joulu 2018 Jouluaattona 24.12. = Lauantaivuorot, viimeiset vuorot lähtevät klo 13. Joulupäivänä 25.12. = Ei liikennettä Tapaninpäivänä 26.12. = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS) Uusi Vuosi Maanantai 31.12.2018 = Normaalit maanantaivuorot Tiistai 1.1.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Pääsiäinen 2019 Kiirastorstai 18.4.2019 = Normaalit arkivuorot + pe-vuorot Pitkäperjantai 19.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Lauantai 20.4.2019 = Normaalit lauantaivuorot 1. pääsiäispäivä su 21.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) 2. pääsiäspäivä ma 22.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS-vuorot) Helatorstai 30. 5. 2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Vappu 2019 Vappupäivä ke 1.5.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS-vuorot) Lisää tietoa: www.kouvolanbussit.fi 2 3 4 5 6 7 Matkakeskus - Kuusankoski - Voikkaa Matkakeskus - Kuusankoski - Voikkaa arkisin ma-pe arkisin ma-pe LAITURI 4H1HH1 4 H1 H1 1 H1 H1 LAITURI 4HH1 H1 H1 H1 H1 1H1 M-P M-P M-P koulp. -
Effectivity of Delivery
Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN REHABILITATION - effectivity of delivery Eero Kyllönen M.D., Ph.D. Clinic of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Oulu University Hospital European Union of Medical Specialists, section of PRM European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri New devices Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri Controlling environment Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri Independent life POHJOIS-POHJANMAAN SAIRAANHOITOPIIRI CASE NORTHERN FINLAND: Oulu University Hospital Northern Ostrobotnia District Eero Kyllönen M.D., Ph.D. Clinic of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT UTSJOKI Finland is devided in five University Hospital INARI districts for special level treatments according to ENONTEKIÖ the agreements and state rules Lappi Länsi- Pohja OUHD district has geographically largest area, MUONIO KITTILÄ SODANKYLÄ 51,14% of Finland SAVUKOSKI Pohjois- OYS 1 Pohjanmaa Kainuu KOLARI Keski- PELKOSENNIEMI Pohjanmaa Pohjois- Savo 733 343 inhabitants 31.12.2009, Etelä- Pohjois- PELLO SALLA Vaasa Pohjanmaa KEMIJÄRVI KYS Karjala Keski- 14% of the total population in Finland Suomi Pirkan- Itä- RovaniemiHospital Sata- maa Etelä- Savo YLITORNIO ROVANIEMI kunta Savo OUH AND FOUR LOCAL HOSPITALS TAYS Päijät- Etelä-Karjala Häme TERVOLA Varsinais- Kanta- POSIO TORNIO Suomi Häme Kymenlaakso 2 TYKS RANUA Helsinki ja Uusimaa KEMINMAA Kemi KUUSAMO SIMO HYKS Hospital KEMI II TAIVALKOSKI YLI-II PUDASJÄRVI HAUKIPUDAS Hospital District Population Percentage% Oulu University HospitalKIIMINKI HAILUOTO OULU SUOMUSSALMI OULUNSALO KEMPELE MUHOS UTAJÄRVI PUOLANKA 1. Lappi 118 371 16,1 LUMIJOKI LIMINKA TYRNÄVÄ SIIKA- HYRYNSALMI RAAHE 2. Länsi-Pohja 65 377 8,9 JOKI RISTIJÄRVI 3 VAALA PYHÄJOKI VIHANTI PALTAMO MERIJÄRVI 3. P-Pohjanmaa 395 510 53,9 SIIKALATVA 4 KALAJOKI OULAINEN KUHMO ALAVIESKA HAAPAVESI VUOLIJOKI Kajaani 4. -
Stakeholder Participation in Regional River Basin Management in Finland
Stakeholder participation in regional river basin management in Finland Sanna Kipinä-Salokannel Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland Lake restoration and management of shallow lakes 21.11.2019, Sanghai (China) The Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Lapland: Rovaniemi, Kemi Kainuu: Kajaani Duties: North Ostrobothnia: Oulu, Ylivieska Ostrobothnia: Vaasa, Kokkola Financing and development services for South Ostrobothnia: Seinäjoki, Vaasa, Kokkola Rovaniemi enterprises, employment-based aid and Central Finland: Jyväskylä North Savo: Kuopio Kemi labour market training, handling of North Karelia: Joensuu agricultural and fishery issues, management South Savo: Mikkeli Pirkanmaa: Tampere Oulu of immigration issues and work with EU Satakunta: Pori Southwest Finland: Turku, Pori Structural Funds projects Kajaani Southeast Finland: Kouvola, Lappeenranta Ylivieska Häme: Lahti, Hämeenlinna Road maintenance, road projects, transport Uusimaa: Helsinki Kokkola permits, traffic safety, public transport and Vaasa island traffic Kuopio Joensuu Seinäjoki Jyväskylä Environmental protection, guidance on the Pori Mikkeli use of land and construction, nature Tampere protection, environmental monitoring, and Lahti Lappeenranta use and management water resources Turku Hämeenlinna Kouvola Helsinki Water framework directive (WFD) § Adopted in 2000 § The objective is a good status of groundwater and surface waters by 2015 (at the latest 2027) § The status of waters must not deteriorate § 6 year period of water management (2009-2015, 2016-2021, 2022-2027) § WFD legislation in Finland: – The Act on Water Resources Management (2004) ►The Act on Water Resources and Marine Management (2011) – The Decree on River Basin Districts (2004) – The Decree on Water Resources Management (2006) – The Decree on Hazardous and Harmful Substance on Aquatic Environment (2006) § Finland´s high standards of water protection are based on the legislation in the Environmental Protection Act (2000) and the Water Act (2011). -
LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021
Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi -
Answers to the Comments by Reviewer RC2
Answers to the comments by reviewer RC2: General comments: 1) My main issue with this manuscript has to do with its readability. There are numerous grammatical errors throughout, some of which are pointed out below. A native English speaker should edit the paper before resubmission. This is now done. The authors are grateful for the thorough review also concerning the language. 2) The authors tend to make some broad sweeping conclusions based on trends that are only significant across a small fraction of the total study region. I would like to see more discussion of the full picture (like Figure 9). Pg 10 L2 and Pg11 L5 are two instances where the discussion is too narrow in focus. The authors have now extended the mentioned discussions (sections 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.3.) as requested. The systematic signal of change is not as dramatic in Finland as in some areas, because of the large variation of winter weather. Especially the sea ice extent of Baltic Sea affects largely the Finnish winter weather. If the Gulf of Finland and Gulf of Bothnia freeze completely the Finnish climate is almost continental in winter even on the coast. We added a comment about the hemispherical study published recently, where we studied the effect of weather parameters on the observed changes in larger areas. Section 3.1.1 main addition: Especially variable melt onset timing is in the coastal regions (Southwestern Finland and Southern Ostrobothnia) and in the Lake district. For those regions the standard deviation values of the melt onset day are 14.3, 14.7 and 14.6, respectively.