DOCSLIB.ORG

PROSPECTS of NUCLEAR POWER in FINLAND the Following States Are Members Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROSPECTS of NUCLEAR POWER in FINLAND the Following States Are Members Of TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES No. 2 Prospects of : Nuclear Power A JOINT STUDY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY AND THE FINNISH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY • VIENNA 1960 PROSPECTS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN FINLAND The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency AFGHANISTAN IRAQ ALBANIA ISRAEL ARGENTINA ITALY AUSTRALIA JAPAN AUSTRIA REPUBLIC OF KOREA BELGIUM LUXEMBOURG BRAZIL MEXICO BULGARIA MONACO- BURMA MOROCCO BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC NETHERLANDS CAMBODIA NEW ZEALAND CANADA NICARAGUA CEYLON NORWAY CHILE PAKISTAN CHINA PARAGUAY COLOMBIA PERU CUBA PHILIPPINES CZECHOSLOVAK SOCIALIST REPUBLIC POLAND DENMARK PORTUGAL DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ROMANIA ECUADOR SPAIN EL SALVADOR SUDAN ETHIOPIA SWEDEN FINLAND SWITZERLAND FRANCE THAILAND FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY TUNISIA GHANA TURKEY GREECE UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC GUATEMALA UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA HAITI UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS HOLY SEE UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC HONDURAS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN HUNGARY IRELAND ICELAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INDIA VENEZUELA INDONESIA VIET-NAM IRAN YUGOSLAVIA The Agency's Statute was approved on 26 October 1956 at an international conference held at United Nations headquarters, New York, and the Agency came into being when the Statute entered into force on 29 July 1957. The first session of the General Conference was held in Vienna, Austria, the permanent seat of the Agency, in October, 1957. The main objective of the Agency is "to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world". © IAEA, 1960 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Karntner Ring 11, Vienna I. Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 1960 PROSPECTS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN FINLAND A Joint Study by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Finnish Atomic Energy Commission TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES No. 2 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY KARNTNER RING, VIENNA I, AUSTRIA 1960 PROSPECTS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN FINLAND, IAEA, VIENNA, 1960 STl/DOC/lO/2 FOREWORD Nuclear power is one of the most important practical applications of atomic energy and a major function of the Agency is to further its development. It be- came apparent in the Agency's early studies in this field that too often the economics of nuclear power were discussed in general terms and without refer- ence to the multitude of conditions governing each specific power situation, which vary widely from country to country and even within a given country. It was also found that the few specific studies which existed had been carried out in countries where it had already been decided to establish a nuclear power station or even to embark on a full-scale nuclear power program. It was there- fore considered that the prospects of nuclear power throughout the world could be realistically assessed only on the basis of a series of studies of as wide a range of different actual situations as possible. At its fourth regular session, the General Conference of the Agency adopted a resolution calling for the con- tinuation of nuclear power surveys in Member States at their request. The Government of Finland invited the Agency to participate in a study of the prospects of nuclear power in Finland during the next decade. The desire of the Government of Finland was, on the one hand, to benefit from the spe- cialized experience of the Agency, and on the other, to make a contribution to the Agency's program of furthering the development of nuclear power. We fully appreciate the value of this contribution and consider it very important for the Agency's program that this first nuclear power study has been undertaken to- gether with a Member State which has long experience in conventional power planning and has consistently looked at nuclear power within the general context of the problem of meeting her growing power needs. The Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency approved the Agency's participation in the study and work began in March 1960. A joint study group was set up between the Finnish Atomic Energy Commission and the Agency's Secretariat, in co-operation with Imatran Voima Osakeyhtio, the State Power Corporation. The study group was headed by the Chairman of the Finnish Atomic Energy Commission and the Agency designated a member of its technical staff to serve as its representative and as special assistant to the head of the study group. An Agency consultant and other members of the technical divisions concerned with nuclear power activities joined in the group's work when the preparatory stage of the study had been completed. The Agency also con- sulted the Energy Division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. While the emphasis in this Report naturally falls on problems specific to Finland, the method followed, the factors discussed and some of the data pre- sented have a more general validity and may serve as guides to other Member States, especially those that rely largely on hydro power. It is hoped that this first report will prove of assistance to them in assessing the possibility of in- troducing nuclear power. December 1960 Director General CONTENTS 1. Introduction and summary of conclusions 9 2. Energy 11 3. Hydroelectric resources .. 12 4. Imported fuels 23 5. Domestic fuels 25 6. Present power situation 31 7. Past growth of power consumption and estimates of future needs 39 8. Power programme until 1965 and probable development until 1970 .... 46 9. Changing role of condensing steam power 53 10. Possible locations for a base-load nuclear power plant in the system.. 62 11. Cost of conventional power 67 12. Cost of nuclear power 82 13. Comparison of nuclear and conventional power costs 90 14. Conclusions 94 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS The utilization of nuclear power for the production of electricity has been under rapid development, especially in the last five years. In some highly industrialized countries of the world nuclear power plants have been developed and built, first for demonstration purposes or as prototypes but more recently as commercial plants with the aim of achieving, at an early stage, economic competitiveness with other available sources of power. At the initial stages in planning a nuclear power programme an analysis of the overall power situation, including the structure of the power production and consumption, is necessary as well as an economic comparison of nuclear and conventional power costs over a foreseeable period of time. In Finland, the main power resource has been, and still is, hydro power. It is clear, however, that the hydro potential is insufficient to cover the in- creasing consumption over a long period of time. Already about one half of this potential has been exploited. Thus the country will necessarily have to consider the utilization of thermal power to an increasingly large extent. There is no indigenous coal or oil. For this reason it has become necessary to investigate realistically the possibilities offered by nuclear power. As it was not possible at the present stage in the rapid development of the technology of power reactors and nuclear fuels to make a long-term prediction concerning the possibilities for establishing a substantial nuclear power pro- gramme in Finland, this joint study concerned itself with a rather narrow field and limited objectives. The aim of the study was to investigate the criteria and conditions under which nuclear power could feasibly be introduced from the technical and economic standpoints into the country's power programme within the decade from 1960 to 1970. It was decided from the beginning to restrict the study to the possibilities of the production of electricity alone in large central plants. The question of small industrial power reactors capable of producing heat as well as electricity has not been studied. Nor has the possibility of in- stalling small power plants in remote areas in the north of the country been investigated. These subjects could well be treated in subsequent studies, should sufficient interest be shown in them and sufficient technical and cost data be- come available. The report begins by reviewing briefly the general energy situation in Finland (Chapter 2) and then proceeds to evaluate the existing energy resources of the country and its energy imports (Chapters 3, 4 and 5). An account of the present electric power situation is given in Chapter 6 while estimates of future power consumption up to 1970 are contained in Chapter 7. Chapter 8 describes the power programme designed to meet the anticipated needs and Chapter 9 is specially devoted to the expected role of thermal power within this programme. In this way a preliminary determination is made of the time when a suffi- ciently large block of thermal power can be economically assigned to base-load duty. This leads to the second part of the report namely to a preliminary com- parison of the costs of conventional and nuclear power at the time when a rela- tively large unit of either type could be operated on base-load. Chapter 10 dis- cusses the possible locations for a base-load nuclear power plant in the system from the viewpoint of optimum load transfer. 9 Chapter 11 proceeds to estimate the probable future costs of hydro power as well as of a thermal conventional plant taking 1960 as a basis and projecting future capital and fuel costs as well as heat rates into the next decade on the basis of explicitly stated assumptions. Chapter 12 gives summary estimates of nuclear power costs for the same tentative dates and endeavours to establish a preliminary generating cost com- parison under different sets of assumptions for fuel costs, load factors and interest rates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geological Report on the Foriet Diamond Property, Kuusamo, Finland
    National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE FORIET DIAMOND PROPERTY, KUUSAMO, FINLAND Latitude/Longitude: N66° 06’ 46.8” E29° 21’ 03.6” ETRS89 UTM: 35W 606212E 7334500N Kuusamo.vaakuna Prepared For: ARCTIC STAR EXPLORATION CORP. BY: KEVIN R. KIVI, P.GEO. KIVI Geoscience Inc. 1100 Memorial Ave, PMB 363, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 4A3, Canada Phone (807) 285-1251 Fax (807) 285-1252 [email protected] Effective Date: June 18, 2017 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE FORIET DIAMOND PROPERTY, KUUSAMO, FINLAND Cover Image: "Kuusamo.vaakuna" by Care; Original design by Kaj and Terttu Kajander. - Own work. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons CONTENTS 1. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Reliance on Other Experts ...................................................................................................................... 3 4. Property Description and Location .................................................................................................... 5 5. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography .................... 11 6. History ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Environment Brought to You by CORE Provided by Helsingin Yliopiston445 Digitaalinen Arkisto the Finnish Eurowaternet
    445 View metadata, citation and similar papersThe at core.ac.uk Finnish Environment The Finnish Environment brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston445 digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Eurowaternet ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION Jorma Niemi, Pertti Heinonen, Sari Mitikka, Heidi Vuoristo, The Finnish Eurowaternet Olli-Pekka Pietiläinen, Markku Puupponen and Esa Rönkä (Eds.) with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies The Finnish Eurowaternet The European Environment Agency (EEA) has a political mandate from with information about Finnish water resources the EU Council of Ministers to deliver objective, reliable and comparable and monitoring strategies information on the environment at a European level. In 1998 EEA published Guidelines for the implementation of the EUROWATERNET monitoring network for inland waters. In every Member Country a monitoring network should be designed according to these Guidelines and put into operation. Together these national networks will form the EUROWATERNET monitoring network that will provide information on the quantity and quality of European inland waters. In the future they will be developed to meet the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. This publication presents the Finnish EUROWATERNET monitoring network put into operation from the first of January, 2000. It includes a total of 195 river sites, 253 lake sites and 74 hydrological baseline sites. Groundwater monitoring network will be developed later. In addition, information about Finnish water resources and current monitoring strategies is given. The publication is available in the internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe445/fe445.htm ISBN 952-11-0827-4 ISSN 1238-7312 EDITA Ltd. PL 800, 00043 EDITA Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland 242 Finland Finland
    FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Force Also in the Future Good Traffic Connections Good Educational Opportunities Living and Recrea
    GROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION CENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Bring your business to Ylivieska, the town of growth! THE REGIONAL EXTENSIVE SUBCON- GROWTH CENTRE TRACTING NETWORK SUBSTANTIAL GOOD TRAFFIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES CONNECTIONS GOOD EDUCATIONAL WORK FORCE OPPORTUNITIES ALSO IN THE FUTURE LIVING AND RECREA- EFFICIENT TIONAL ACTIVITIES BUSINESS SERVICES GROWTHGROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION TOP CENTRECENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Ylivieska grows – truly The regional growth centre Studied growth Ylivieska has its charm. Ylivieska is an Finland has 29 functionally significant urban exceptional town amongst regional towns. regions. The amount has decreased by six The studies show that it is growing and during the last 20 years. At the same, one new developing. region has joined the group of notable urban regions: the Ylivieska region. Ylivieska has good resources for growth. It (MDI 2019: Urban Network Study) is active and energetic but also a safe ”small big town” as the centre of its neighbouring According to Statistics Finland’s projection, municipalities and as an intersection of roads the town population will be approximately and railways. 18 000 in 2040, which is 3000 more people than now, 2020. The growth projection of jobs Ylivieska works systematically to enable the is also good: the aim is that the town will have market area of up to 100 000 inhabitants to 1000 new jobs by 2030. continue growing. The growth percent of Ylivieska population by 2040 according to +18% Statistics Finland’s projection. GROWTH TRAFFIC WORK LIVING AND BUSINESS INDUSTRY COMMERCE EDUCATION TOP CENTRE CONNECTIONS FORCE ACTIVITIES SERVICES Ylivieska offers great oppor- tunities for an entrepreneur in the industrial sector Growth locomotives We have a good environment for businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience
    6th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small • Dubr°Vr HR0600024 Nuclear Option in Electricity Production - Finnish Experience Antti Piirto TVO Nuclear Services Ltd 27160 Olkiluoto, Finland [email protected] Nuclear energy has played a key role in Finnish electricity production since the beginning of the 1980s. The load factors of nuclear power plants have been high, radioactive emissions low and the price of nuclear electricity competitive. In addition, detailed plans exist for the final disposal of nuclear waste as well as for the financing of final disposal, and the implementation of final disposal has already been started with the authorities regulating nuclear waste management arrangements at all levels. Deregulation of the electricity market has meant increasing trade and co-operation, with both the other Nordic countries and the other EU Member States. In May 2002, the Finnish Parliament approved the application for a decision in principle on the construction of the fifth nuclear power plant unit in Finland. In December 2003, Teollisuuden Voima Oy concluded an agreement for the supply of the new nuclear power plant unit with a consortium formed by the French- German Framatome ANP and the German Siemens. The new unit, which will be built at Olkiluoto, is a pressurised water reactor having a net electrical output of about 1600 MW. The total value of the project is ca. 3 billion Euros, including investments connected with the development of infrastructure and waste management. The objective is to connect the new unit to the national grid in 2009. When in operation, the unit will increase the share of nuclear energy of Finnish electricity consumption, currently some 26%, to a little more than one third, and decrease Finnish carbon dioxide emissions by more than 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe
    Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy www.psocommons.org/rhcpp Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 3 (2010) Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe Robert Darst, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Jane I. Dawson, Connecticut College Abstract This article focuses on the growing prospects for a nuclear power renaissance in Europe. While accepting the conventional wisdom that the incipient renaissance is being driven by climate change and energy security concerns, we argue that it would not be possible without the pioneering work of Sweden and Finland in providing a technological and sociopolitical solution to the industry’s longstanding “Achilles’ heel”: the safe, permanent, and locally acceptable disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In this article, we track the long decline and sudden resurgence of nuclear power in Europe, examining the correlation between the fortunes of the industry and the emergence of the Swedish model for addressing the nuclear waste problem. Through an in-depth exploration of the evolution of the siting model initiated in Sweden and adopted and successfully implemented in Finland, we emphasize the importance of transparency, trust, volunteerism, and “nuclear oases”: locations already host to substantial nuclear facilities. Climate change and concerns about energy independence and security have all opened the door for a revival of nuclear power in Europe and elsewhere, but we argue that without the solution to the nuclear waste quandary pioneered by Sweden and Finland, the industry would still be waiting for the nuclear renaissance. Keywords: high-level radioactive waste, permanent nuclear waste disposal, nuclear power in Europe, nuclear politics in Finland and Sweden © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 49 - Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Kouvola - Anjalankoski Alueelliset Indikaattorit Tiedot Pääosin Vuodelta 2017, Osa 2016, Julkaistu Tammikuussa 2019
    Kouvola - Anjalankoski Alueelliset indikaattorit Tiedot pääosin vuodelta 2017, osa 2016, julkaistu tammikuussa 2019 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 1 Tietolähde • Paavo – Postinumeroalueittainen avoin tieto, Tilastokeskus • Paavo sisältää tietoja asukasrakenteesta, koulutusasteesta, asukkaiden ja talouksien tuloista, talouksien koosta ja elämänvaiheesta, rakennuksista ja asunnoista, työpaikoista sekä asukkaiden pääasiallisesta toiminnasta. • Paavo-tilastotiedot ja kartta-aineistot päivitetään vuosittain tammikuussa. • Asukkailla tarkoitetaan alueella vakinaisesti asuvaa väestöä. Ne henkilöt, joilla väestötietojärjestelmän mukaan oli kotipaikka Suomessa vuoden lopussa (31. joulukuuta), kuuluvat asukkaisiin kansalaisuudesta riippumatta. Asukkaiden sijainti määräytyy asuinrakennusten koordinaattien perusteella. • Henkilöt, jotka asuvat laitoksissa, saavat sijaintitiedot laitoksen koordinaattien mukaan, mikäli ne ovat tiedossa. Pois sen sijaan jäävät koordinaatiton laitosväestö, ulkomailla tilapäisesti asuvat Suomen kansalaiset ja henkilöt, joiden sijaintitietoa kunnassa ei tiedetä. HUOM! Tästä syystä viralliset alueittaiset väkiluvut poikkeavat PAAVO-tilastoaineiston alueittaisista summatiedoista. • Seuraavissa taulukoissa on alueen lisäksi koko Kouvolan arvo ja kaikkien alueiden (Anjalankoski, Elimäki, Jaala, Kouvola, Kuusankoski ja Valkeala) minimi ja maksimi arvo. 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 2 Anjalankosken alueen postinumeroalueet kartalla 13.8.2019 Lähde: Tilastokeskus, Paavo 3 Anjalankoski 45460 Savero, 46400 Kaipiainen,
    [Show full text]
  • BUSSIAIKATAULUT Voimassa 9.8.2018 – 2.6.2019
    Kouvolan BUSSIAIKATAULUT Voimassa 9.8.2018 – 2.6.2019 Päivitetty 1.3.2019 kouvolanbussit.fi | kouvola.digitransit.fi Matkakeskuksen linja-autopysäkit Pysäkiltä Pysäkiltä H1 H3 Voikkaa (1, 2) Eskolanmäki (10) Kuusankoski (1, 2, 7) Lehtomäki (11) Anjala, Inkeroinen, Myllykoski (3) Tornionmäki (12, 13) Koria (4K) Mielakka (13) Kasarminmäki (14) Laiturit 1-7 Laituri 1 Elimäki, Koria (4) Laituri 2 Utti, Kaipiainen, Sippola (8) Laituri 3 Kausala Laituri 4 Jaala (9) Laituri 5 Valkeala (5) Laituri 6 Sippola ja Liikkala Kouvolankatu tu H3 H1 Hallituskatu Asemaka Hallituskatu Matkakeskuksen Laiturit 1-7 pääovi 2 1 Juhlapyhien poikkeusliikenne Eri juhlapyhien aikaan on linja-autoliikenteessä selviä poik- keuksia normaaliin liikennöintiin. Kaukoliikenne kannattaa tarkistaa liikennöitsijöiden omilta sivuilta tai Matkahuollosta Pyhäinpäivä 3.11.2018 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS) Itsenäisyyspäivä 6.12.2018 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS) Joulu 2018 Jouluaattona 24.12. = Lauantaivuorot, viimeiset vuorot lähtevät klo 13. Joulupäivänä 25.12. = Ei liikennettä Tapaninpäivänä 26.12. = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS) Uusi Vuosi Maanantai 31.12.2018 = Normaalit maanantaivuorot Tiistai 1.1.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Pääsiäinen 2019 Kiirastorstai 18.4.2019 = Normaalit arkivuorot + pe-vuorot Pitkäperjantai 19.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Lauantai 20.4.2019 = Normaalit lauantaivuorot 1. pääsiäispäivä su 21.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) 2. pääsiäspäivä ma 22.4.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS-vuorot) Helatorstai 30. 5. 2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (ei SS-vuoroja) Vappu 2019 Vappupäivä ke 1.5.2019 = Sunnuntaivuorot (S- ja SS-vuorot) Lisää tietoa: www.kouvolanbussit.fi 2 3 4 5 6 7 Matkakeskus - Kuusankoski - Voikkaa Matkakeskus - Kuusankoski - Voikkaa arkisin ma-pe arkisin ma-pe LAITURI 4H1HH1 4 H1 H1 1 H1 H1 LAITURI 4HH1 H1 H1 H1 H1 1H1 M-P M-P M-P koulp.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectivity of Delivery
    Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN REHABILITATION - effectivity of delivery Eero Kyllönen M.D., Ph.D. Clinic of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Oulu University Hospital European Union of Medical Specialists, section of PRM European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri New devices Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri Controlling environment Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri Independent life POHJOIS-POHJANMAAN SAIRAANHOITOPIIRI CASE NORTHERN FINLAND: Oulu University Hospital Northern Ostrobotnia District Eero Kyllönen M.D., Ph.D. Clinic of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT UTSJOKI Finland is devided in five University Hospital INARI districts for special level treatments according to ENONTEKIÖ the agreements and state rules Lappi Länsi- Pohja OUHD district has geographically largest area, MUONIO KITTILÄ SODANKYLÄ 51,14% of Finland SAVUKOSKI Pohjois- OYS 1 Pohjanmaa Kainuu KOLARI Keski- PELKOSENNIEMI Pohjanmaa Pohjois- Savo 733 343 inhabitants 31.12.2009, Etelä- Pohjois- PELLO SALLA Vaasa Pohjanmaa KEMIJÄRVI KYS Karjala Keski- 14% of the total population in Finland Suomi Pirkan- Itä- RovaniemiHospital Sata- maa Etelä- Savo YLITORNIO ROVANIEMI kunta Savo OUH AND FOUR LOCAL HOSPITALS TAYS Päijät- Etelä-Karjala Häme TERVOLA Varsinais- Kanta- POSIO TORNIO Suomi Häme Kymenlaakso 2 TYKS RANUA Helsinki ja Uusimaa KEMINMAA Kemi KUUSAMO SIMO HYKS Hospital KEMI II TAIVALKOSKI YLI-II PUDASJÄRVI HAUKIPUDAS Hospital District Population Percentage% Oulu University HospitalKIIMINKI HAILUOTO OULU SUOMUSSALMI OULUNSALO KEMPELE MUHOS UTAJÄRVI PUOLANKA 1. Lappi 118 371 16,1 LUMIJOKI LIMINKA TYRNÄVÄ SIIKA- HYRYNSALMI RAAHE 2. Länsi-Pohja 65 377 8,9 JOKI RISTIJÄRVI 3 VAALA PYHÄJOKI VIHANTI PALTAMO MERIJÄRVI 3. P-Pohjanmaa 395 510 53,9 SIIKALATVA 4 KALAJOKI OULAINEN KUHMO ALAVIESKA HAAPAVESI VUOLIJOKI Kajaani 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Participation in Regional River Basin Management in Finland
    Stakeholder participation in regional river basin management in Finland Sanna Kipinä-Salokannel Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland Lake restoration and management of shallow lakes 21.11.2019, Sanghai (China) The Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Lapland: Rovaniemi, Kemi Kainuu: Kajaani Duties: North Ostrobothnia: Oulu, Ylivieska Ostrobothnia: Vaasa, Kokkola Financing and development services for South Ostrobothnia: Seinäjoki, Vaasa, Kokkola Rovaniemi enterprises, employment-based aid and Central Finland: Jyväskylä North Savo: Kuopio Kemi labour market training, handling of North Karelia: Joensuu agricultural and fishery issues, management South Savo: Mikkeli Pirkanmaa: Tampere Oulu of immigration issues and work with EU Satakunta: Pori Southwest Finland: Turku, Pori Structural Funds projects Kajaani Southeast Finland: Kouvola, Lappeenranta Ylivieska Häme: Lahti, Hämeenlinna Road maintenance, road projects, transport Uusimaa: Helsinki Kokkola permits, traffic safety, public transport and Vaasa island traffic Kuopio Joensuu Seinäjoki Jyväskylä Environmental protection, guidance on the Pori Mikkeli use of land and construction, nature Tampere protection, environmental monitoring, and Lahti Lappeenranta use and management water resources Turku Hämeenlinna Kouvola Helsinki Water framework directive (WFD) § Adopted in 2000 § The objective is a good status of groundwater and surface waters by 2015 (at the latest 2027) § The status of waters must not deteriorate § 6 year period of water management (2009-2015, 2016-2021, 2022-2027) § WFD legislation in Finland: – The Act on Water Resources Management (2004) ►The Act on Water Resources and Marine Management (2011) – The Decree on River Basin Districts (2004) – The Decree on Water Resources Management (2006) – The Decree on Hazardous and Harmful Substance on Aquatic Environment (2006) § Finland´s high standards of water protection are based on the legislation in the Environmental Protection Act (2000) and the Water Act (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • LUETTELO Kuntien Ja Seurakuntien Tuloveroprosenteista Vuonna 2021
    Dnro VH/8082/00.01.00/2020 LUETTELO kuntien ja seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista vuonna 2021 Verohallinto on verotusmenettelystä annetun lain (1558/1995) 91 a §:n 3 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 520/2010, antanut seuraavan luettelon varainhoitovuodeksi 2021 vahvistetuista kuntien, evankelis-luterilaisen kirkon ja ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan seurakuntien tuloveroprosenteista. Kunta Kunnan Ev.lut. Ortodoks. tuloveroprosentti seurakunnan seurakunnan tuloveroprosentti tuloveroprosentti Akaa 22,25 1,70 2,00 Alajärvi 21,75 1,75 2,00 Alavieska 22,00 1,80 2,10 Alavus 21,25 1,75 2,00 Asikkala 20,75 1,75 1,80 Askola 21,50 1,75 1,80 Aura 21,50 1,35 1,75 Brändö 17,75 2,00 1,75 Eckerö 19,00 2,00 1,75 Enonkoski 21,00 1,60 1,95 Enontekiö 21,25 1,75 2,20 Espoo 18,00 1,00 1,80 Eura 21,00 1,50 1,75 Eurajoki 18,00 1,60 2,00 Evijärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Finström 19,50 1,95 1,75 Forssa 20,50 1,40 1,80 Föglö 17,50 2,00 1,75 Geta 18,50 1,95 1,75 Haapajärvi 22,50 1,75 2,00 Haapavesi 22,00 1,80 2,00 Hailuoto 20,50 1,80 2,10 Halsua 23,50 1,70 2,00 Hamina 21,00 1,60 1,85 Hammarland 18,00 1,80 1,75 Hankasalmi 22,00 1,95 2,00 Hanko 21,75 1,60 1,80 Harjavalta 21,50 1,75 1,75 Hartola 21,50 1,75 1,95 Hattula 20,75 1,50 1,80 Hausjärvi 21,50 1,75 1,80 Heinola 20,50 1,50 1,80 Heinävesi 21,00 1,80 1,95 Helsinki 18,00 1,00 1,80 Hirvensalmi 20,00 1,75 1,95 Hollola 21,00 1,75 1,80 Huittinen 21,00 1,60 1,75 Humppila 22,00 1,90 1,80 Hyrynsalmi 21,75 1,75 1,95 Hyvinkää 20,25 1,25 1,80 Hämeenkyrö 22,00 1,70 2,00 Hämeenlinna 21,00 1,30 1,80 Ii 21,50 1,50 2,10 Iisalmi
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to the Comments by Reviewer RC2
    Answers to the comments by reviewer RC2: General comments: 1) My main issue with this manuscript has to do with its readability. There are numerous grammatical errors throughout, some of which are pointed out below. A native English speaker should edit the paper before resubmission. This is now done. The authors are grateful for the thorough review also concerning the language. 2) The authors tend to make some broad sweeping conclusions based on trends that are only significant across a small fraction of the total study region. I would like to see more discussion of the full picture (like Figure 9). Pg 10 L2 and Pg11 L5 are two instances where the discussion is too narrow in focus. The authors have now extended the mentioned discussions (sections 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.3.) as requested. The systematic signal of change is not as dramatic in Finland as in some areas, because of the large variation of winter weather. Especially the sea ice extent of Baltic Sea affects largely the Finnish winter weather. If the Gulf of Finland and Gulf of Bothnia freeze completely the Finnish climate is almost continental in winter even on the coast. We added a comment about the hemispherical study published recently, where we studied the effect of weather parameters on the observed changes in larger areas. Section 3.1.1 main addition: Especially variable melt onset timing is in the coastal regions (Southwestern Finland and Southern Ostrobothnia) and in the Lake district. For those regions the standard deviation values of the melt onset day are 14.3, 14.7 and 14.6, respectively.
    [Show full text]