Larvae to Terbufos, Chlorpyrifos and Aldicarb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Larvae to Terbufos, Chlorpyrifos and Aldicarb Jan-Mar 2000 Susceptibility of Sugarbeet Root Maggot 17 Susceptibility of Sugarbeet Root Maggot Tetanops myopaeforlnis (Diptera: Otitidae) Larvae to Terbufos, Chlorpyrifos and Aldicarb J. Scott Armstrong!, Robert J. Dregseth and Albin W. Anderson2 North Dakota State University, Department ofEntomology, Fargo, ND 58105 ABSTRACT Organophosphate and carbamate insecticides have been used for control of the sugarbeet root maggot, Tetanops myopaeformis (von Roder) in sugarbeet Beta vulgaris (L.) for over thirty years in the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota. Insecticides applied in furrow, at­ planting, have not always prevented significant larval feed­ ing injury in production sugarbeet fields. The reasons for inadequate granular insecticide performance have never been clear. This study determined lethal concentration values (LC & LC ) expressed in ppm for larval sugarbeet so 90 root maggots exposed to technical terbufos, chlorpyrifos and aldicarb. Mortality assays were conducted on larvae produced from adults collected from three locations in the Red River Valley from 1987 to 1997. Data combined across all years resulted in LCso values of0.023 for terbufos, 0.121 for chlorpyrifos, and 0.138 for aldicarb. LC90 values for all years combined were 0.051 for terbufos, 0.235 for chlorpyrifos, and 0.286 for aldicarb. The consistency of LCso and LC90 values from assays conducted over a ten year period strongly suggests that insecticide resistance is not a factor when the performance of granular terbufos, chlorpyrifos or aldicarb is inadequate. lCurrent address: Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Box 42122, Lubbock TX, 79409. 2 Retired Professor Emeritus, North Dakota State University, Department of Entomology. Jan-Mar 2000 Susceptibility of Sugarbeet Root Maggot 19 In the two most recent years ofefficacy trials with granular insec­ ticides in the Red River Valley, aldicarb-treated test plots have resulted in some ofthe lowest mean damage ratings (Armstrong et a!., 1997, Annstrong et a\., 1998) achieved over the last twenty years. These low damage ratings occurred in the face of heavy adult fly activity as indicated by adult fly traps, and could be a result of lower usage of carbamate insecticides and thiocarbamate herbicides, which eventually lowered soil microbes respon­ sible for rapid degradation. Several areas in the Red River Valley experienced significant SBRM injury following the application of aldicarb at-planting in the early to mid 1980s. Rapid degradation ofcarbamate insecticides (Suett and Jukes 1988, Read 1987) applied to soil was not fully understood at the time con­ trol failures were occurring. However, control failures were widely be­ lieved to be the result of insecticide resistance of the SBRM to carbamate insecticides. Organophosphate insecticides will oxidize at significantly dif­ ferent rates dependant upon previous insecticide use (Read 1987), soil type and pH (Laveglia & Dahm, 1975), suggesting that accelerated degra­ dation could contribute to the failure of insecticides to control SBRM.. The following study was undertaken to establish lethal concentra­ ) tion values (LClO LC9o for larval SBRM collected over a ten year period. The values could·then be used as base-line data, to determine if the sllscep­ tibility of the SBRM exposed to organophosphate, carbamate and terbufos changed over time, and if changes could be recognized as true insecticide resistance. SBRM larvae used in this study were collected from fields with high densities. Some of the larvae collected were from fields where control failures were reported for carbamate insecticides. MATERIALS AND METHODS Neonate, first instar SBRM larvae were used to determine lethal ) concentration (LClO and LC9o values. Larvae used for testing were pro­ duced from collecting third instar larvae from the soil of producers fields near St. Thomas, ND, Hillsboro, ND and Glyndon, MN starting in the late SUITUl1ers of 1986 to 1997. The larvae collected in 1986 were not tested until 1987 because of time requirements of the rearing process. SBRM larvae enter a slow transition into diapause in late summer and require 6 months at 38F to complete diapause and pupation. The SUlTUTler collected larvae were removed from cold storage and left at room temperature in petri dishes for pupation and adult emergence. Adult males and females were paired and placed in adult cages for mating. Eggs were collected from black cloth provided at the bottom of the adult cages. Twenty to twenty five neonate larvae were placed on 4.6 cm diameter circular paper-towel disks 20 10urnal of Sugar Beet Research Vol 37, No I (Fort Howard Corporation, Green Bay, WI) and treated with dilutions of technical grade aldicarb (Temik®, Rhone-Poulenc, Alexander Park, NC), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban®, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN) and terbufos (Counter®, American Cyanamid, Princeton, NJ) in acetone. Treatments were replicated five times for a total of 100 to 125 treated larvae and 25 non­ treated larvae were used as controls. Control larvae were placed on paper­ towel disks treated with acetone. The acetone was allowed to dissipate for one hour before placing any of the treatment groups, including the controls on paper-towel disks. Aldicarb and chlorpyrifos dilutions were 0.06, 0.13, 0.17,0.21,0.31 ppm. Terbufos dilutions were 0.01 , 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.06 ppm. Mortality was assessed at 3 hr of exposure. Neonate larvae of the SBRM are transparent where systolic movement ofthe heart can clearly be seen. Larvae that had no movement of the heart were considered dead. A control group was used for each collection site tested; however, a truly susceptible population could not be tested because SBRM can not be reared in the laboratory from egg to adult, preventing the utilization of a known population that has never been exposed to insecticide. The data were analyzed with probit analysis (LeOra Software, 1987) where LC50 and LC90 values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. A composite curve that included all mortality data for all years was calculated for future resistance-ratio reference. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Terbufos had the lowest LC and LC values indicating that it is so 90 more toxic to SBRM than chlorpyrifos or aldicarb in a petri dish assay. The overall LCso for all years tested was 0.023 ppm while the LC90 was 0.051 ppm (Table 1). The consistency of upper and lower 95% confidence limits indicates that the individuals collected and tested at St. Thomas and Glyndon did not show signs of insecticide tolerance or resistance, although a sus­ ceptible population was not used for comparative purposes and resistance­ ratios could not be compared. Neither the St Thomas nor Glyndon sugarbeet producing areas had significant control failures with terbufos. Mortality assays using technical chlorpyrifos resulted in an LCso value of 0.121 and a LC90 value of 0.235 ppm when all years were com­ bined (Table 2). Aldicarb was similar to chlorpyrifos with LC and LC so 90 values of 0.138 and 0.286 ppm, respectively (Table 3). All three locations (St Thomas, ND, Hillsboro, ND, and Glyndon, MN) experienced control failures following the at-planting use of aldicarb in the mid 1980s. The individuals tested in 1987 were collected from a field that sustained sig­ nificant injury after aldicarb was used at-planting in 1986. The progeny of these individuals showed no sign of resistance. The most probable cause 20 Journal of Sugar Beet Research Vol 37, No I (Fort Howard Corporation, Green Bay, WI) and treated with dilutions of technical grade aldicarb (Temik®, Rhone-Poulenc, Alexander Park, NC), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban®, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN) and terbufos (Counter®, American Cyanamid, Princeton, NJ) in acetone. Treatments were replicated five times for a total of 100 to 125 treated larvae and 25 non­ treated larvae were used as controls. Control larvae were placed on paper­ towel disks treated with acetone. The acetone was allowed to dissipate for one hour before placing any of the treatment groups, including the controls on paper-towel disks. Aldicarb and chlorpyrifos dilutions were 0.06, 0.13, 0.17,0.21,0.31 ppm. Terbufos dilutions were 0.01,0.02, 0.03,0.05, and 0.06 ppm. Mortality was assessed at 3 hr of exposure. Neonate larvae of the SBRM are transparent where systolic movement ofthe heart can clearly be seen. Larvae that had no movement of the heart were considered dead. A control group was used for each collection site tested; however, a truly susceptible population could not be tested because SBRM can not be reared in the laboratory from egg to adult, preventing the utilization of a known population that has never been exposed to insecticide. The data were analyzed with probit analysis (LeOra Software, 1987) where LC and LC values were calculated with 95% confidence 50 90 intervals. A composite curve that included all mortality data for all years was calculated for future resistance-ratio reference. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Terbufos had the lowest LC50 and LC90 values indicating that it is more toxic to SBRM than chlorpyrifos or aldicarb in a petri dish assay. The overall LC50 for all years tested was 0.023 ppm while the LC90 was 0.051 ppm (Table I). The consistency of upper and lower 95% confidence limits indicates that the individuals collected and tested at St. Thomas and Glyndon did not show signs of insecticide tolerance or resistance, although a sus­ ceptible popUlation was not used for comparative purposes and resistance­ ratios could not be compared. Neither the St Thomas nor Glyndon sugarbeet producing areas had significant control failures with terbufos. Mortality assays using technical chlorpyrifos resulted in an LCso value of 0.121 and a LC90 value of 0.235 ppm when all years were com­ bined (Table 2). Aldicarb was similar to chlorpyrifos with LC;o and LC90 values of 0.138 and 0.286 ppm, respectively (Table 3).
Recommended publications
  • Carbamate Pesticides Aldicarb Aldicarb Sulfoxide Aldicarb Sulfone
    Connecticut General Statutes Sec 19a-29a requires the Commissioner of Public Health to annually publish a list setting forth all analytes and matrices for which certification for testing is required. Connecticut ELCP Drinking Water Analytes Revised 05/31/2018 Microbiology Total Coliforms Fecal Coliforms/ E. Coli Carbamate Pesticides Legionella Aldicarb Cryptosporidium Aldicarb Sulfoxide Giardia Aldicarb Sulfone Carbaryl Physicals Carbofuran Turbidity 3-Hydroxycarbofuran pH Methomyl Conductivity Oxamyl (Vydate) Minerals Chlorinated Herbicides Alkalinity, as CaCO3 2,4-D Bromide Dalapon Chloride Dicamba Chlorine, free residual Dinoseb Chlorine, total residual Endothall Fluoride Picloram Hardness, Calcium as Pentachlorophenol CaCO3 Hardness, Total as CaCO3 Silica Chlorinated Pesticides/PCB's Sulfate Aldrin Chlordane (Technical) Nutrients Dieldrin Endrin Ammonia Heptachlor Nitrate Heptachlor Epoxide Nitrite Lindane (gamma-BHC) o-Phosphate Metolachlor Total Phosphorus Methoxychlor PCB's (individual aroclors) Note 1 PCB's (as decachlorobiphenyl) Note 1 Demands Toxaphene TOC Nitrogen-Phosphorus Compounds Alachlor Metals Atrazine Aluminum Butachlor Antimony Diquat Arsenic Glyphosate Barium Metribuzin Beryllium Paraquat Boron Propachlor Cadmium Simazine Calcium Chromium Copper SVOC's Iron Benzo(a)pyrene Lead bis-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Magnesium bis-(ethylhexyl)adipate Manganese Hexachlorobenzene Mercury Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Miscellaneous Organics Selenium Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Silver Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Emergency Response Commission
    Florida State Emergency Response Commission Sub-Committee on Training (SOT) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MEDICAL TREATMENT PROTOCOLS Version 3.3 TOXIDROMES Toxidromes are clinical syndromes that the patient presents with. These patterns of signs and symptoms are essential for the successful recognition of chemical exposure. The toxidromes identified in this protocol are chemical exposure based while others such as the opioids are found within general medical protocol. These chemical toxidromes are identified clinically into five syndromes: Irritant Gas Toxidrome Asphyxiant Toxidrome Corrosive Toxidrome Hydrocarbon and Halogenated Hydrocarbons Toxidrome Cholinergic Toxidrome Each can present as a clinical manifestation of the chemical/poisoning involved with some cross-over between toxidromes. This list combines the toxic syndromes found within NFPA 473 (A.5.4.1(2) and traditional syndromes. Toxidrome Correlation to NFPA Standard 473 and Traditional Syndromes Toxidrome NFPA 473 A.5.4.1(2) Hazardous Materials Protocol Correlation Irritant Gas (j) Irritants Bronchospasm OC Pepper spray & lacrimants Asphyxiant (c) Chemical asphyxiants Carbon Monoxide (d) Simple asphyxiants Aniline dyes, Nitriles, Nitrares (h) Blood Agents Cyanide & Hydrogen Sulfide (n) Nitrogen Compounds Closed Space Fires Simple Asphyxants Corrosive (a) Corrosives Hydrofluroic Acid (g) Vesicants Chemical burns to the eye Choramine and Chlorine Hydrocarbon (e) Organic solvents Phenol and (q) Phenolic Compounds Halogenated Hydrocarbons Halogenated Hydrocarbons Cholinergic (b) Pesticides
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)
    APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5-
    [Show full text]
  • Malathion Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report
    SERA TR-052-02-02c Malathion Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Final Report Submitted to: Paul Mistretta, COR USDA/Forest Service, Southern Region 1720 Peachtree RD, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 USDA Forest Service Contract: AG-3187-C-06-0010 USDA Forest Order Number: AG-43ZP-D-06-0012 SERA Internal Task No. 52-02 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 5100 Highbridge St., 42C Fayetteville, New York 13066-0950 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com May 12, 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Appendices ......................................................................................................................... vi List of Attachments........................................................................................................................ vi ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS ............................................................... vii COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................... x CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List for Reporting Year 2017 (Including Toxic Chemical Categories)
    Table II. EPCRA Section 313 Chemical List For Reporting Year 2017 (including Toxic Chemical Categories) Individually listed EPCRA Section 313 chemicals with CAS numbers are arranged alphabetically starting on page II-3. Following the alphabetical list, the EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are arranged in CAS number order. Covered chemical categories follow. Note: Chemicals may be added to or deleted from the list. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Call Center or the TRI-Listed Chemicals website will provide up-to-date information on the status of these changes. See section B.3.c of the instructions for more information on the de minimis % limits listed below. There are no de minimis levels for PBT chemicals since the de minimis exemption is not available for these chemicals (an asterisk appears where a de minimis limit would otherwise appear in Table II). However, for purposes of the supplier notification requirement only, such limits are provided in Appendix C. Chemical Qualifiers Certain EPCRA Section 313 chemicals listed in Table II have parenthetic “qualifiers.” These qualifiers indicate that these EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are subject to the section 313 reporting requirements if manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in a specific form or when a certain activity is performed. An EPCRA Section 313 chemical that is listed without a qualifier is subject to reporting in all forms in which it is manufactured, processed, and otherwise used. The following chemicals are reportable only if they are manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in the specific form(s) listed below: Chemical/ Chemical Category CAS Number Qualifier Aluminum (fume or dust) 7429-90-5 Only if it is a fume or dust form.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Assessment of the Cumulative Acute Exposure to Organophosphorus and Carbamate Insecticides in the Brazilian Diet E.D
    Toxicology 222 (2006) 132–142 Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative acute exposure to organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides in the Brazilian diet E.D. Caldas a,∗, P.E. Boon b, J. Tressou c a Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Bras´ılia, 70919-970 Bras´ılia, DF, Brazil b RIKILT, Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands c INRA, Unit´eM´et@risk, Methodologies d’analyse de risque alimentaire INA-PG, 75231 Paris, France Received 10 October 2005; received in revised form 1 February 2006; accepted 13 February 2006 Available online 6 March 2006 Abstract In the present study, the cumulative exposure of 25 acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibiting pesticides through the consumption of nine fruits and vegetables by the Brazilian population was assessed. Food consumption data were obtained from a household budget survey conducted in all Brazilian states from July 2002 to June 2003. Residue data from 4001 samples were obtained from the Brazilian national monitoring program on pesticide residues. Relative potency factors (RPF) were calculated with methamidophos or acephate as index compounds (IC), using BMD10 or NOAEL for AChE inhibition, mostly in rat brain, obtained from national and international pesticide evaluations. Monocrotophos and triazophos, in addition to aldicarb, had the highest calculated RPF in any scenario. The exposure to AChE inhibiting pesticides for the general population at P99.9, represented 33.6% of the ARfD as methamidophos and 70.2% ARfD as acephate. The exposure calculated as acephate could exceed the ARfD at the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for this percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Chemical P026 1-(O-Chlorophenyl)Thiourea P081 1
    Code Chemical P026 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P081 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate (R) P042 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, (R)- P067 1,2-Propylenimine P185 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)- carbonyl]oxime 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a,-hexahydro-, P004 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5alpha,8alpha,8abeta)- 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-, P060 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5beta,8beta,8abeta)- P002 1-Acetyl-2-thiourea P048 2,4-Dinitrophenol P051 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth [2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9 -hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2abeta,3alpha,6alpha,6abeta,7 beta, 7aalpha)-, & metabolites 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9- hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- P037 octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2aalpha,3beta,6beta,6aalpha,7 beta, 7aalpha)- P045 2-Butanone, 3,3-dimethyl-1-(methylthio)-, O-[methylamino)carbonyl] oxime P034 2-Cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1- phenylbutyl)-, & salts, when present at P001 concentrations greater than 0.3% P069 2-Methyllactonitrile P017 2-Propanone, 1-bromo- P005 2-Propen-1-ol P003 2-Propenal P102 2-Propyn-1-ol P007 3(2H)-Isoxazolone, 5-(aminomethyl)- P027 3-Chloropropionitrile P047 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, & salts P059 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro- 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P008 4-Aminopyridine P008 4-Pyridinamine P007 5-(Aminomethyl)-3-isoxazolol 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-
    [Show full text]
  • Aldicarb by Caroline Cox Pulses Across the Junctions Between Nerves
    Aldicarb By Caroline Cox pulses across the junctions between nerves. (given over a one-year period). The high- This causes loss of muscular coordination, est dose at which no adverse effects were In 1966, four years before the insecticide convulsions, and ultimately death.5 The observed (called the NOEL) was 0.02 mg/ 11 aldicarb was registered for use in the United AChE inhibition is said to be reversible be- kg/day, about one-tenth of the LD50. States, researchers were using the chemical cause the aldicarb disassociates from the There is evidence that people may suf- on an experimental basis.1 One researcher AChE within several hours. This occurs even fer acute symptoms when exposed to even brought a small amount home and his wife if death has occurred. Organophosphate in- lower levels of aldicarb. In humans who applied it to the soil under a backyard rose secticides (malathion and diazinon, for ex- consumed aldicarb-contaminated water- bush. Over three weeks later she ate a sprig ample) have the same mode of action ex- melons, clinical signs of aldicarb poison- of mint from a plant growing nearby. Within cept that the AChE inhibition is not as ing were found in individuals consuming half an hour she was suffering from vomit- readily reversible.7 as little as 0.002 mg/kg of the aldicarb ing, diarrhea, and involuntary urination. Her Aldicarb is a systemic insecticide. It is metabolite aldicarb sulfoxide. This pupils closed to pinpoints, her muscles applied as granules below the soil surface amount is one-tenth the NOEL in the twitched, and her breathing was difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare Resource
    Health Care Resource: Links between Pesticide Exposures and Mental Health Prepared by the Mental Health and Environment Working Group of the Collaborative on Health and the Environment www.healthandenvironment.org Mental Health Effects from Pesticide Exposure Exposure to pesticides can have behavioral and psychiatric consequences. The purpose of this resource is to help mental health clinicians and health care providers become aware of the association between pesticide exposure and these consequences and to provide links to relevant research findings. Many people are at risk of pesticide exposure, including those who: • work in agriculture, landscaping or other settings (such as grocery stores, schools, daycares and office buildings) in which pest problems are treated with chemicals; • live downwind from where aerial spraying of pesticides is done; • live in communities where spray and runoff can contaminate both surface and ground water; or • live in urban dwellings where pest control is used. Outside use may take months for the pesticide to degrade to half-life or roughly half potency. Indoors there are no degrading elements such as sunshine, soil or rain to degrade potency; these undegraded pesticides can be re-suspended into the air in dust particles. Health care providers should consider the possibility that the symptoms associated with mental health disorders, such as irritability, depression or anxiety, may be the result of acute or chronic pesticide exposure. No matter what the presenting ailment may be, clinicians who care for individuals either at risk of pesticide exposure or those with known exposure are encouraged to inquire about the presence of depression, anxiety, or any of the other symptoms listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Pre-And Posttreatment of Paraoxon Exposure
    molecules Article Combined Pre- and Posttreatment of Paraoxon Exposure Dietrich E Lorke 1,2,* , Syed M Nurulain 3 , Mohamed Y Hasan 4, Kamil Kuˇca 5 and Georg A Petroianu 2,6 1 Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, P O Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, UAE 2 Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Department of Cellular Biology & Pharmacology, Florida International University, University Park GL 495, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199, USA; [email protected] 3 Bio Science Department, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Bio Sciences Block, CUI, Park Road, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan; [email protected] 4 Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain 15551, UAE; [email protected] 5 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanského 62/26, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; [email protected] 6 Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, P O Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, UAE * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +971-2-501-8381 Academic Editors: Pascal Houzé and Frédéric J. Baud Received: 5 March 2020; Accepted: 25 March 2020; Published: 27 March 2020 Abstract: Aims: Organophosphates (OPCs), useful agents as pesticides, also represent a serious health hazard. Standard therapy with atropine and established oxime-type enzyme reactivators is unsatisfactory. Experimental data indicate that superior therapeutic results can be obtained when reversible cholinesterase inhibitors are administered before OPC exposure. Comparing the protective efficacy of five such cholinesterase inhibitors (physostigmine, pyridostigmine, ranitidine, tacrine, or K-27), we observed best protection for the experimental oxime K-27.
    [Show full text]