Materials and Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Materials and Methods Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase in Corynebacterium glutamicum Der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades vorgelegt von Eva Hänßler aus Aachen Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Naturwissen- schaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15.02.2008 Vorsitzender der Promotionskommission: Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bänsch Erstberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Andreas Burkovski Zweitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Reinhard Krämer Content Content 1 Zusammenfassung/Summary........................................................1 2 Introduction.....................................................................................3 2.1 Corynebacterium glutamicum.............................................................................3 2.2 Uptake and assimilation of nitrogen sources....................................................4 2.3 Nitrogen-dependent regulation...........................................................................6 2.4 GDH at the interface between nitrogen and carbon metabolism...................11 2.4.1 Glutamate dehydrogenase of E. coli ................................................................12 2.4.2 Glutamate dehydrogenase of B. subtilis...........................................................13 2.4.3 Glutamate dehydrogenase of C. glutamicum ...................................................15 2.5 Objectives ...........................................................................................................17 3 Materials and methods .................................................................19 3.1 Bacterial strains and plasmids .........................................................................19 3.2 Cultivation of bacteria........................................................................................22 3.2.1 Culture medium for E. coli ................................................................................22 3.2.2 Culture media for corynebacteria .....................................................................22 3.2.3 Antibiotics .........................................................................................................23 3.2.4 Growth conditions.............................................................................................24 3.3 Genetic manipulation of bacteria......................................................................25 3.3.1 Preparation of competent E. coli cells and transformation ...............................25 3.3.2 Preparation of competent C. glutamicum cells and transformation..................26 3.4 Working with DNA ..............................................................................................26 3.4.1 Isolation of plasmid DNA from E. coli ...............................................................26 3.4.2 Gel electrophoresis and extraction of DNA from agarose gels.........................27 3.4.3 Preparation of chromosomal DNA from C. glutamicum....................................27 3.4.4 Purification and enrichment of DNA .................................................................27 3.4.5 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ....................................................................28 3.4.6 Two-step PCR ..................................................................................................28 3.4.7 Restriction of DNA............................................................................................29 3.4.8 Ligation of DNA fragments ...............................................................................29 3.4.9 Sequencing of DNA..........................................................................................29 3.5 Working with RNA ..............................................................................................30 3.5.1 Isolation of total RNA and RNA gel electrophoresis.........................................30 Content 3.5.2 Synthesis of digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes .................................................31 3.5.3 Northern blot analysis.......................................................................................31 3.5.4 Dot blot analysis ...............................................................................................33 3.5.5 Reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR......................................................................34 3.5.6 Quantitative real time RT PCR .........................................................................34 3.5.7 Primer extension analysis ................................................................................35 3.6 Working with proteins........................................................................................37 3.6.1 Protein purification............................................................................................37 3.6.2 Quantification of proteins..................................................................................38 3.6.3 SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE).............................................38 3.6.4 Staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue .............................................................39 3.6.5 Western blotting ...............................................................................................39 3.6.6 Determination of enzyme activity .....................................................................41 3.6.6.1 GDH activity measurements.....................................................................41 3.6.6.2 Glutamyltransferase test...........................................................................42 3.6.7 Determination of promoter activity....................................................................43 3.6.8 Gel shift assays and competition assays .........................................................43 4 Results...........................................................................................45 4.1 Purification and characterization of glutamate dehydrogenase....................45 4.1.1 Purification of GDH...........................................................................................45 4.1.2 Characterization of GDH in lysine-producing strains........................................47 4.1.3 Gradual expression of gdh ...............................................................................49 4.2 Transcriptional regulation of gdh .....................................................................51 4.2.1 Mutational analyses of the gdh promoter region ..............................................51 4.2.2 Determination of the transcription start.............................................................57 4.2.3 Nitrogen-dependent transcription .....................................................................60 4.2.3.1 Function of AmtR......................................................................................61 4.2.3.2 Influence of putative regulators on gdh transcription................................66 4.2.4 Studies on sigma factor-dependent gdh expression ........................................71 4.2.5 Investigation of the putative orf Cg2281...........................................................73 4.3 Identification of AmtR and FarR target genes .................................................75 4.3.1 Identification of FarR target genes ...................................................................75 4.3.1.1 Characterization of arginine biosynthesis genes ......................................76 4.3.1.2 Determination of FarR and ArgR binding sites .........................................79 4.3.1.3 Transcriptional regulation of arginine biosynthesis genes........................81 Content 4.3.2 Identification of AmtR target genes ..................................................................83 5 Discussion.....................................................................................89 5.1 Characterization of GDH in the context of systems biology..........................89 5.2 Transcriptional regulation of gdh .....................................................................93 5.3 Identification of FarR and AmtR target genes ...............................................100 5.4 The interface between nitrogen and carbon metabolism.............................106 6 Appendix......................................................................................109 6.1 Regulation of glutamine synthetase in corynebacteria................................109 6.2 Plasmid constructions.....................................................................................112 References ........................................................................................117 Publications ......................................................................................131 Abbreviations and units...................................................................132 Zusammenfassung 1 1 Zusammenfassung Die Glutamatdehydrogenase (GDH) aus Corynebacterium glutamicum, einem Actinomyceten mit herausragender biotechnologischer Bedeutung, befindet sich an einer wichtigen Position innerhalb des Stoffwechsels, da sie Stickstoffassimilation und den Zentralstoffwechsel verbindet. Unter Überschussbedingungen ist die GDH an der Ammoniumassimilation beteiligt und über das Substrat α-Ketoglutarat besteht eine direkte Verknüpfung zum Citrat Zyklus. Aufgrund der NADPH-Abhängigkeit kann weiterhin der pool an Reduktionsäquivalenten beeinflusst werden. Trotz dieser scheinbar bedeutsamen Stellung
Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.422,609 B2 Teichberg (45) Date of Patent: Aug
    USOO9422609B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.422,609 B2 Teichberg (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 23, 2016 (54) METHODS, COMPOSITIONS AND DEVICES (58) Field of Classification Search FOR MANTAINING CHEMICAL BALANCE CPC ........................ C02F 1/725; C12Y 305/01005 OF CHLORINATED WATER USPC ........................... 210/754; 435/195, 227 231 See application file for complete search history. (75) Inventor: Vivian I. Teichberg, Savyon (IL) (56) References Cited (73) Assignees: Mia Levite, Savyon (IL); Yaar Teichberg, Savyon (IL); Nof Lyle U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Teichberg, Savyon (IL) 4,793,935 A * 12/1988 Stillman ............... CO2F 1.5236 21Of727 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 6,673,582 B2 * 1/2004 McTavish ..................... 435/122 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 1044 days. (Continued) (21) Appl. No.: 12/225.18O FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS y x- - - 9 AU 41971 5, 1979 (22) PCT Filed: Mar. 14, 2007 GB 2025919 1, 1980 (86). PCT No.: PCT/L2007/OOO336 (Continued) S 371 (c)(1) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (2), (4) Date: Sep. 16, 2008 Examiner's Report Dated Oct. 6, 2010 From the Australian Govern (87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2007/107.981 ment, IP Australia Re. Application No. 2007228391. (Continued) PCT Pub. Date: Sep. 27, 2007 (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner — Peter Keyworth (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Browdy and Neimark, US 201OfO270228A1 Oct. 28, 2010 PLLC Related U.S. Application Data (57) ABSTRACT (60) Provisional application No. 60/783,028, filed on Mar. A composition-of-matter for use in water treatment, com 17, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodococcus Erythropolis and Gordonia Alkanivorans: Interesting Desulfurizing
    IN SILICO MODELING AND ANALYSIS FOR IMPROVING DESULFURIZING BACTERIAL STRAINS SHILPI AGGARWAL (M.Tech., Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2012 Declaration DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. Shilpi Aggarwal 10 April 2013 i Acknowledgments ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I take this chance to express my sincere gratitude and love for my parents (Mr Subash and Mrs Renu) for their undying faith, encouragement, and unconditional love throughout my life. This PhD thesis is dedicated to them as I could have never come so far without their support. It is with immense pleasure and respect I take this opportunity to express my thankfulness to all those who have helped me in shaping my research career and making my stay in Singapore a truly memorable one. With the term ‘PhD’, the first person who comes to my mind is my supervisor, Prof I. A. Karimi. I take this chance to thank him for giving me an opportunity to pursue my research career under his able guidance. As a mentor he has made me acquire skills for critical and logical thinking. His directions and guidance has helped me get deeper insights into the subject and made my learning a great experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Creatinine and Urea Biosensors Based on a Novel Ammonium Ion-Selective Copper-Polyaniline Nano-Composite
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library Biosensors and Bioelectronics 77 (2016) 505–511 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biosensors and Bioelectronics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bios Creatinine and urea biosensors based on a novel ammonium ion-selective copper-polyaniline nano-composite M. Zhybak a,b, V. Beni b,n, M.Y. Vagin c, E. Dempsey d, A.P.F. Turner b, Y. Korpan a,n a Laboratory of Biomolecular Electronics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine b Biosensors & Bioelectronics Centre, IFM, Linköping University, 58183, Sweden c Applied Physics Division, IFM, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden d Centre for Research in Electroanalytical Technologies, Department of Science, ITT Dublin, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland article info abstract Article history: The use of a novel ammonium ion-specific copper-polyaniline nano-composite as transducer for hy- Received 22 July 2015 drolase-based biosensors is proposed. In this work, a combination of creatinine deaminase and urease Received in revised form has been chosen as a model system to demonstrate the construction of urea and creatinine biosensors to 29 September 2015 illustrate the principle. Immobilisation of enzymes was shown to be a crucial step in the development of Accepted 3 October 2015 the biosensors; the use of glycerol and lactitol as stabilisers resulted in a significant improvement, Available online 9 October 2015 especially in the case of the creatinine, of the operational stability of the biosensors (from few hours to at Keywords: least 3 days).
    [Show full text]
  • 12) United States Patent (10
    US007635572B2 (12) UnitedO States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,635,572 B2 Zhou et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 22, 2009 (54) METHODS FOR CONDUCTING ASSAYS FOR 5,506,121 A 4/1996 Skerra et al. ENZYME ACTIVITY ON PROTEIN 5,510,270 A 4/1996 Fodor et al. MICROARRAYS 5,512,492 A 4/1996 Herron et al. 5,516,635 A 5/1996 Ekins et al. (75) Inventors: Fang X. Zhou, New Haven, CT (US); 5,532,128 A 7/1996 Eggers Barry Schweitzer, Cheshire, CT (US) 5,538,897 A 7/1996 Yates, III et al. s s 5,541,070 A 7/1996 Kauvar (73) Assignee: Life Technologies Corporation, .. S.E. al Carlsbad, CA (US) 5,585,069 A 12/1996 Zanzucchi et al. 5,585,639 A 12/1996 Dorsel et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,593,838 A 1/1997 Zanzucchi et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,605,662 A 2f1997 Heller et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,620,850 A 4/1997 Bamdad et al. 5,624,711 A 4/1997 Sundberg et al. (21) Appl. No.: 10/865,431 5,627,369 A 5/1997 Vestal et al. 5,629,213 A 5/1997 Kornguth et al. (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS US 2005/O118665 A1 Jun. 2, 2005 EP 596421 10, 1993 EP 0619321 12/1994 (51) Int. Cl. EP O664452 7, 1995 CI2O 1/50 (2006.01) EP O818467 1, 1998 (52) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacitive Field-Effect EIS Chemical Sensors and Biosensors
    sensors Review Capacitive Field-Effect EIS Chemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Status Report Arshak Poghossian 1,* and Michael J. Schöning 2,* 1 MicroNanoBio, Liebigstr. 4, 40479 Düsseldorf, Germany 2 Institute of Nano- and Biotechnologies (INB), FH Aachen, Campus Jülich, Heinrich-Mußmannstr. 1, 52428 Jülich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (M.J.S.) Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 29 September 2020; Published: 2 October 2020 Abstract: Electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor (EIS) field-effect sensors belong to a new generation of electronic chips for biochemical sensing, enabling a direct electronic readout. The review gives an overview on recent advances and current trends in the research and development of chemical sensors and biosensors based on the capacitive field-effect EIS structure—the simplest field-effect device, which represents a biochemically sensitive capacitor. Fundamental concepts, physicochemical phenomena underlying the transduction mechanism and application of capacitive EIS sensors for the detection of pH, ion concentrations, and enzymatic reactions, as well as the label-free detection of charged molecules (nucleic acids, proteins, and polyelectrolytes) and nanoparticles, are presented and discussed. Keywords: chemical sensor; biosensor; field effect; capacitive EIS sensor; pH sensor; enzyme biosensor; label-free detection; charged molecules; DNA biosensor; protein detection 1. Introduction Research in the field of biochemical sensors is one of the most fascinating and multidisciplinary
    [Show full text]
  • All Enzymes in BRENDA™ the Comprehensive Enzyme Information System
    All enzymes in BRENDA™ The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/index.php4?page=information/all_enzymes.php4 1.1.1.1 alcohol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.B1 D-arabitol-phosphate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.2 alcohol dehydrogenase (NADP+) 1.1.1.B3 (S)-specific secondary alcohol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.3 homoserine dehydrogenase 1.1.1.B4 (R)-specific secondary alcohol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.4 (R,R)-butanediol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.5 acetoin dehydrogenase 1.1.1.B5 NADP-retinol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.6 glycerol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.7 propanediol-phosphate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.8 glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) 1.1.1.9 D-xylulose reductase 1.1.1.10 L-xylulose reductase 1.1.1.11 D-arabinitol 4-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.12 L-arabinitol 4-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.13 L-arabinitol 2-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.14 L-iditol 2-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.15 D-iditol 2-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.16 galactitol 2-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.17 mannitol-1-phosphate 5-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.18 inositol 2-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.19 glucuronate reductase 1.1.1.20 glucuronolactone reductase 1.1.1.21 aldehyde reductase 1.1.1.22 UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase 1.1.1.23 histidinol dehydrogenase 1.1.1.24 quinate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.25 shikimate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.26 glyoxylate reductase 1.1.1.27 L-lactate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.28 D-lactate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.29 glycerate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.30 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.31 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase 1.1.1.32 mevaldate reductase 1.1.1.33 mevaldate reductase (NADPH) 1.1.1.34 hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) 1.1.1.35 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA
    [Show full text]
  • Amfep Guidance on REACH Pre-Registration of Enzymes
    Amfep/08/44 30 May 2008 Amfep guidance on REACH pre-registration of enzymes 1. Purpose and timing During the period 1 June to 1 December 2008, European enzyme manufacturers and importers can pre-register the enzyme substances currently manufactured in EU and imported into the EU for technical applications. Manufacturers and importers inside the EU may appoint Third Party Representatives to remain anonymous and if based outside the EU, they may appoint Only Representatives. The pre-registration provision of REACH enables substances to remain on the market subject to later registration in 2010, 2013 or 2018, depending on tonnage. Pre-registration is made to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and result in the formation of a Substance Information Exchange Forum (SIEF) per enzyme. ECHA will publish a list of pre- registered substances by 1 January 2009. Amfep has formed a pre-consortium of members and associated manufacturing companies to prepare enzyme (pre-) registrations and SIEF discussions. The Amfep secretariat can be contacted for further information and on questions related to enzyme pre-registrations. This document is intended to facilitate pre-registration of enzymes. References are given to detailed guidance on enzyme identification, pre-registration and other REACH requirements. However, it must be considered as guidance only. Each potential registrant remains fully responsible for selecting its enzymes and making individual pre-registrations. 2. Scope Enzymes listed on the European chemicals inventory EINECS are considered phase-in (‘existing’) substances and can be pre-registered. Enzymes manufactured in the EU at least once after 31 May 1992, without being placed on the EU market by the manufacturer or importer, are regarded as phase-in substances.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0240226A1 Mathur Et Al
    US 20150240226A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0240226A1 Mathur et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 27, 2015 (54) NUCLEICACIDS AND PROTEINS AND CI2N 9/16 (2006.01) METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THEMI CI2N 9/02 (2006.01) CI2N 9/78 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: BP Corporation North America Inc., CI2N 9/12 (2006.01) Naperville, IL (US) CI2N 9/24 (2006.01) CI2O 1/02 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Eric J. Mathur, San Diego, CA (US); CI2N 9/42 (2006.01) Cathy Chang, San Marcos, CA (US) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC. CI2N 9/88 (2013.01); C12O 1/02 (2013.01); (21) Appl. No.: 14/630,006 CI2O I/04 (2013.01): CI2N 9/80 (2013.01); CI2N 9/241.1 (2013.01); C12N 9/0065 (22) Filed: Feb. 24, 2015 (2013.01); C12N 9/2437 (2013.01); C12N 9/14 Related U.S. Application Data (2013.01); C12N 9/16 (2013.01); C12N 9/0061 (2013.01); C12N 9/78 (2013.01); C12N 9/0071 (62) Division of application No. 13/400,365, filed on Feb. (2013.01); C12N 9/1241 (2013.01): CI2N 20, 2012, now Pat. No. 8,962,800, which is a division 9/2482 (2013.01); C07K 2/00 (2013.01); C12Y of application No. 1 1/817,403, filed on May 7, 2008, 305/01004 (2013.01); C12Y 1 1 1/01016 now Pat. No. 8,119,385, filed as application No. PCT/ (2013.01); C12Y302/01004 (2013.01); C12Y US2006/007642 on Mar. 3, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • C. Glutamicum
    γ-Aminobutyrate as carbon and nitrogen source for Corynebacterium glutamicum and regulation of the catabolic genes by GabR Inaugural dissertation for the attainment of the title of doctor in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf presented by Lingfeng Zhu born in Yancheng City, Jiangsu, China Jülich, March 2020 The thesis in hand has been performed at the Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, from October 2016 until December 2019 under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Michael Bott and Dr. Meike Baumgart. Published by permission of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Michael Bott Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-1: Biotechnology Forschungszentrum Jülich Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ilka Axmann Institute of Synthetic Microbiology Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Date of the oral examination: 17.02.2020 Results described in this dissertation have been summarized in a manuscript which has been submitted to the Journal of Bacteriology: Zhu L, Polen T, Baumgart, M. and Bott, M. (2019) γ-Aminobutyrate (GABA) utilization and its regulation by GabR in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Submitted to the Journal of Bacteriology on December 8, 2019 Abbreviations Abbreviations ∆ Deletion a.u. Arbitrary units ATCC American Type Culture Collection bp Base pairs BHI(S) Brain Heart Infusion (+Sorbitol) et al. et alii EMSA Electrophoretic mobility
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material (ESI) for Natural Product Reports
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Natural Product Reports. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Supplement to the paper of Alexey A. Lagunin, Rajesh K. Goel, Dinesh Y. Gawande, Priynka Pahwa, Tatyana A. Gloriozova, Alexander V. Dmitriev, Sergey M. Ivanov, Anastassia V. Rudik, Varvara I. Konova, Pavel V. Pogodin, Dmitry S. Druzhilovsky and Vladimir V. Poroikov “Chemo- and bioinformatics resources for in silico drug discovery from medicinal plants beyond their traditional use: a critical review” Contents PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) Approach S-1 Table S1. The lists of 122 known therapeutic effects for 50 analyzed medicinal plants with accuracy of PASS prediction calculated by a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure during the training and number of active compounds in PASS training set S-6 Table S2. The lists of 3,345 mechanisms of action that were predicted by PASS and were used in this study with accuracy of PASS prediction calculated by a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure during the training and number of active compounds in PASS training set S-9 Table S3. Comparison of direct PASS prediction results of known effects for phytoconstituents of 50 TIM plants with prediction of known effects through “mechanism-effect” and “target-pathway- effect” relationships from PharmaExpert S-79 S-1 PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) Approach PASS provides simultaneous predictions of many types of biological activity (activity spectrum) based on the structure of drug-like compounds. The approach used in PASS is based on the suggestion that biological activity of any drug-like compound is a function of its structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Handbook of Enzymes
    Dietmar Schomburg Ida Schomburg (Eds.) Springer Handbook of Enzymes Alphabetical Name Index 1 23 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 2010 This work is subject to copyright. All rights reserved, whether in whole or part of the material con- cerned, specifically the right of translation, printing and reprinting, reproduction and storage in data- bases. The publisher cannot assume any legal responsibility for given data. Commercial distribution is only permitted with the publishers written consent. Springer Handbook of Enzymes, Vols. 1–39 + Supplements 1–7, Name Index 2.4.1.60 abequosyltransferase, Vol. 31, p. 468 2.7.1.157 N-acetylgalactosamine kinase, Vol. S2, p. 268 4.2.3.18 abietadiene synthase, Vol. S7,p.276 3.1.6.12 N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase, Vol. 11, p. 300 1.14.13.93 (+)-abscisic acid 8’-hydroxylase, Vol. S1, p. 602 3.1.6.4 N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase, Vol. 11, p. 267 1.2.3.14 abscisic-aldehyde oxidase, Vol. S1, p. 176 3.2.1.49 a-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, Vol. 13,p.10 1.2.1.10 acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (acetylating), Vol. 20, 3.2.1.53 b-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, Vol. 13,p.91 p. 115 2.4.99.3 a-N-acetylgalactosaminide a-2,6-sialyltransferase, 3.5.1.63 4-acetamidobutyrate deacetylase, Vol. 14,p.528 Vol. 33,p.335 3.5.1.51 4-acetamidobutyryl-CoA deacetylase, Vol. 14, 2.4.1.147 acetylgalactosaminyl-O-glycosyl-glycoprotein b- p. 482 1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, Vol. 32, 3.5.1.29 2-(acetamidomethylene)succinate hydrolase, p. 287 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNCTIONAL EXPLORATION and CHARACTERIZATION of the DEAMINASES of COG0402 a Dissertation by DANIEL STEPHEN HITCHCOCK Submitted To
    FUNCTIONAL EXPLORATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DEAMINASES OF COG0402 A Dissertation by DANIEL STEPHEN HITCHCOCK Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Frank M. Raushel Committee Members, Tadhg Begley Vishal Gohil Paul Straight Head of Department, Gregory Reinhart May 2014 Major Subject: Biochemistry Copyright 2014 Daniel Stephen Hitchcock ABSTRACT High throughput sequencing technology and availability of this information has changed the way enzyme families can be studied. Sequence information from large public databases such as GenBank and UniProtKB can easily retrieved for the purpose of identifying unique enzymatic activities. The strategy adopted for this study is to identify characterized enzymes and the sequence features which give rise to their substrate specificity. Homologues of these enzymes are retrieved, and any active site variations can be readily identified. Cluster of Orthologous Groups (cog) 0402 is a family of enzymes which comprise a portion of the amidohydrolase superfamily. This group catalyzes a deamination reaction, releasing free ammonia and replacing it with a tautomerized oxygen. Cog0402 is most well known for guanine and cytosine deaminase, however other functions exist. One such function was that of S- adenosylhomocysteine deaminase, which was related to a large group of uncharacterized enzymes. These enzymes were predicted by us to deaminate 5’- modified adenosines. The enzymes were physically characterized these predictions were confirmed and a 5’-deoxyadenosine deaminase was discovered in addition to an 8-oxoadenine deaminase. During this study it was noted that background isoguanine deaminase activity was found at appreciable rates in E.
    [Show full text]