DOCSLIB.ORG

EASA NPA Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EASA NPA Template Ref. Ares(2019)3139235 - 13/05/2019 Annex III to Final Report Revision of the SPI Regulation RMT.0679 – Surveillance, performance and interoperability December 2017 European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI Baseline Analysis Report RMT.0679 Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Version 20 – 9 November 2017 BASIC INFORMATION The rulemaking group for the Rulemaking Task 0679 “Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Implementing Rule” has initiated a series of activities to assess the scale of the issues with surveillance performance and interoperability in the EASA Member States. This provides a baseline scenario to describe the current situation and what would occur without new regulatory proposals. The assessment of the baseline scenario was supported by surveys sent to the EASA Advisory Bodies (see survey map below) on 22 July 2016. These surveys were completed with additional studies and reports when the answers were not sufficient to assess the scale of the problem. This results in a Baseline Analysis Report (BAR) to support the Regulatory Impact Assessment for RMT.0679. The Agency would like to thank very much all the respondent who have enable by their answers to understand more in depth this issue and all the persons who contributed to the studies performed for the RMT.0679. The Agency welcomes feedback on the evidences and estimates gathered in this report (contact: [email protected]). Disclaimer The number of answers to this survey cannot ensure that the results are representative of the sector. Therefore the interpretation of the results has to be cautious. The Agency strongly recommends that you contact us ([email protected]) for any questions on the usage of the survey. Survey map Support for: RMT.0679 Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Audience: ATM/ANS Providers Airspace Users Manufacturers NAAs, NSAs Military stakeholders Aviation associations Addressees: MABs, … Survey period: 22 July to 15 December 2016 Tools: EUSurvey website Emails with word and excel files Studies developed for this RMT. TE.RPRO.00034-004 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA intranet/Internet. Page 2 of 183 e An agency o the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Page 3 of 183 An agency of the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI Table of contents 1. Background and report structure ............................................................................................................................... 7 2. Objective of this report: define and assess the scales of the problem(s) ................................................................... 7 3. The problems to be addressed ................................................................................................................................... 8 4. Overview of the outcomes of problems analysed .................................................................................................... 10 4.1. Problem area “lack of cost efficiency with the surveillance equipment” ....................................................... 10 4.2. Problem area “lack of sustainability of spectrum (with a special focus on 1030/1090MHz)” ........................ 11 4.3. Problem area “lack of surveillance performance and functionality targets” .................................................. 13 4.4. Problem area “lack of interoperability between surveillance equipment” .................................................... 13 4.5. Problem area “lack of security of transmitted surveillance data” .................................................................. 14 4.6. Interface with state aircraft and military surveillance .................................................................................... 14 4.7. Update of the problem tree ............................................................................................................................ 16 5. Baseline scenario ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 6. Future needs expressed by respondents .................................................................................................................. 17 7. Surveys: scope and answers overview...................................................................................................................... 18 7.1. General information on the sources used for this report ............................................................................... 18 7.2. Overview of the answers ................................................................................................................................. 19 7.3. SPISGA survey .................................................................................................................................................. 19 7.4. Surveillance data sharing survey ..................................................................................................................... 22 7.5. State aircraft, large aircraft and business aviation fleet survey ...................................................................... 23 7.6. VFR GA fleet survey ......................................................................................................................................... 24 7.7. Surveillance infrastructure survey .................................................................................................................. 25 7.8. Overview of the military responses ................................................................................................................ 26 7.9. Representativeness of the answers ................................................................................................................ 28 8. Lack of cost-efficiency for surveillance ..................................................................................................................... 29 8.1. Main outcomes ............................................................................................................................................... 29 8.2. General aspects ............................................................................................................................................... 30 8.3. Aircraft avionics ............................................................................................................................................... 30 8.3.1. Transponder capabilities for the fleet > 5700 kg MTOW under SPI IR ......................................................... 30 8.3.2. Compliance costs with SPI IR ........................................................................................................................ 30 8.3.3. General Aviation fleet ................................................................................................................................... 33 8.3.3.1 GA fleet based on EASA Survey 2016 ........................................................................................................... 33 8.4. Ground surveillance ........................................................................................................................................ 37 8.4.1. Ground surveillance assets ........................................................................................................................... 37 8.4.2. Ground surveillance maps ............................................................................................................................ 39 8.4.3. Civil ground surveillance costs (€) ................................................................................................................ 43 8.4.4. Surveillance in the en-route charges and airspace user expectations ......................................................... 44 9. Surveillance datasharing between ANSPs ................................................................................................................ 45 9.1. Main outcomes ............................................................................................................................................... 45 9.1.1. Conclusions for the problem definition ........................................................................................................ 45 9.1.2. Global analysis to support the conclusions .................................................................................................. 45 9.1.2.1 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between civil and MIL .......................................................... 45 9.1.2.2 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between civil ANSPs (same country) .................................... 46 9.1.2.3 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between ANSPs at European level ....................................... 46 9.1.2.4 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem with other entities than ANSPs ............................................ 47 9.2. Overview on received answers ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 28011 Madrid (España) Foreword
    CICIAIAIACAC COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Report A-016/2016 Accident involving a Robin DR-400-180 aircraft, registration F-GXBB, in the town of Arbizu, Navarre (Spain) on 19 May 2016 Report A-016/2016 Accident involving a Robin DR-400-180 aircraft, registration F-GXBB, in the town of Arbizu, Navarre (Spain) on 19 May 2016 SUBSECRETARÍA GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE FOMENTO COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL © Ministerio de Fomento Secretaría General Técnica Centro de Publicaciones NIPO Línea: 161-18-122-X NIPO Papel: 161-18-123-5 Depósito legal: M-16715-2018 Maquetación: David García Arcos Impresión: Centro de Publicaciones COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Tel.: +34 91 597 89 63 E-mail: [email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 http://www.ciaiac.es 28011 Madrid (España) Foreword This report is a technical document that reflects the point of view of the Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC) regarding the circumstances of the accident object of the investigation, and its probable causes and consequences. In accordance with the provisions in Article 5.4.1 of Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Convention; and with articles 5.5 of Regulation (UE) nº 996/2010, of the European Parliament and the Council, of 20 October 2010; Article 15 of Law 21/2003 on Air Safety and articles 1., 4. and 21.2 of Regulation 389/1998, this investigation is exclusively of a technical nature, and its objective is the prevention of future civil aviation accidents and incidents by issuing, if necessary, safety recommendations to prevent from their reoccurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Airport Operations(Pp
    Accepted manuscript. Not for distribution. Please quote as: Beria, P., Laurino, A., & Nadia Postorino, M. (2017). Low-Cost Carriers and Airports: A Complex Relationship. In The Economics of Airport Operations(pp. 361-386). Emerald Publishing Limited. Book series: Advances in Airline Economics Volume 6: “Economics of airport operations” CHAPTER 14 Low-cost carriers and airports: A complex relationship Paolo Beria*, Antonio Laurino and Maria Nadia Postorino *author contact information: [email protected] Abstract In the last decades, low-cost carriers have generated several changes in the air market for both passengers and airports. Mainly for regional airports, low-cost carriers have represented an important opportunity to improve their connectivity levels and passenger traffic. Furthermore, many regional airports have become key factors to regenerate the local economy by improving accessibility and stimulating several markets, such as tourism. However, the relationship between low-cost carriers and airports is rather complex and the outcomes not always predictable. In order to analyse and understand better such relationship and its outcomes, this chapter discusses the main underlying factors identified in: relation with the regional air market (secondary/primary airports), balance of power (dominated/non-dominated airports) and industrial organisation (bases/non-bases). Starting from the proposed Relative Closeness Index, which combines yearly airport passengers and distance between airport pairs, a large sample of European airports is analysed. Then, a smaller sub-sample – which includes selected, significant case studies referring to mid-sized airports – is discussed in detail. Among the main findings, airports sharing their catchment area with others are in a very risky position, due to the potential mobility of LCCs, while geographically isolated airports in good catchment areas can better counterbalance the power of carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Hotels in Ponferrada
    Ponferrada 9th to 13th September 2013 Practical information about Ponferrada Organised by: Hosted by: GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE INDUSTRIA, ENERGÍA Y TURISMO 9 – 13 September, 2013 Ponferrada (Spain) El Bierzo PONFERRADA LEÓN Ponferrada 389 km Madrid How to get Ponferrada BY CAR. The northwest motorway (A-6) runs through El Bierzo from East to West, connecting Madrid and Galicia. Madrid to A Coruña: exit number 382, Ponferrada Este A Coruña to Madrid: exit number 388, Ponferrada - Villablino Click the image to connect to Google Maps. BY BUS. El Bierzo is well connected by road. ALSA – Bus station: Avda. de la Libertad, s/n. Tel.: +34 987 401 065 BY TRAIN. Public transport runs daily to the main cities in Galicia, to Barcelona, Irún, Madrid, León and all the other cities on the way. RENFE - Train station in Ponferrada: Avda. del Ferrocarril, s/n. Tel.: +34 987 410 067 BY PLANE. León Airport: Tel.: +34 987 877 700 It is the closest airport to Ponferrada. This is a domestic airport, but with daily connections from/to Madrid and Barcelona. To travel from León Airport to Ponferrada by car, AVIS and Europcar, oer car hire service at the airport. Taxis from Leon to Ponferrada cost about 120€. Barajas Airport in Madrid: Tel. +34 913 211 000 From Madrid airport, you can hire a car with AVIS, Europcar, Hertz or National Atesa. Please notice that it is about 4h driving from Madrid . Another options are to catch the ALSA bus or the train. Further aeld, there are other airports near Ponferrada. It is recommended to hire a car or catch a bus to arrive from there to Ponferrada.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Accounts ENAIRE and Subsidiaries 2018
    Annual Accounts ENAIRE and Subsidiaries 2018 MINISTERIO INTERVENCIÓN GENERAL DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DEL ESTADO DE HACIENDA AUDITORÍA DE CUENTAS CONSOLIDADAS ENAIRE Ejercicio 2018 Plan de control AP 2019 Código AUDInet 2019/410 Oficina Nacional de Auditoría La autenticidad de este documento puede ser comprobada mediante el código electrónico: E6FZU4OCP8LLD2KP en http://www.pap.minhap.gob.es ÍNDICE I. INTRODUCCIÓN ................................................................................................................ 1 II. OBJETIVO Y ALCANCE DEL TRABAJO: RESPONSABILIDAD DE LOS AUDITORES ..................... 2 III. OPINIÓN .......................................................................................................................... 3 IV. INFORME SOBRE OTROS REQUERIMIENTOS LEGALES Y REGLAMENTARIOS ........................ 4 La autenticidad de este documento puede ser comprobada mediante el código electrónico: E6FZU4OCP8LLD2KP en http://www.pap.minhap.gob.es I. INTRODUCCIÓN La Intervención General de la Administración del Estado, a través de la Oficina Nacional de Auditoría, en uso de las competencias que le atribuye el artículo 168 de la Ley General Presupuestaria ha auditado las cuentas anuales consolidadas adjuntas de la entidad pública empresarial ENAIRE y sus sociedades dependientes, que comprenden, el balance consolidado a 31 de diciembre de 2018, la cuenta de pérdidas y ganancias consolidada, el estado de cambios en el patrimonio neto consolidado, el estado de flujos de efectivo consolidado y la memoria consolidada correspondientes al ejercicio terminado en dicha fecha. El Presidente de ENAIRE, es responsable de la formulación de las cuentas anuales del grupo de acuerdo con el marco de información financiera que se detalla en la nota 2 de la memoria adjunta y en particular de acuerdo con los principios y criterios contables, asimismo, es responsable del control interno que considere necesario para permitir que la preparación de las citadas cuentas anuales esté libre de incorrección material.
    [Show full text]
  • ENFOREX? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Name, Telephone, E-Mail and Address of Your Spanish Teacher NOTE: Invitation Letter
    dates & prices 2010 24TOP Spanish Language Schools in Spain & Latin America Spanish in the Spanish World What does Enforex offer? Enforex Guarantees Ages Average of 5 students per classroom (maximum of 10 in Spain and 8 5% Seniors 5% Children (5-14) (50+ years) students max in Tenerife & Latin America). ENFOREX schools are open all 15% Executives & Professionals year round and courses start every Monday of the year, for beginners too. 25% Adults More than 20 years of experience in teaching Spanish to foreign students. Our high quality Spanish programs and our experience make us a leader in Spanish language teaching. 6 different levels of Spanish all year round (Europe: A1-C2; US: 101-4004). 20% Teenagers (14-18) All levels mentioned, with the exception of superior, are divided into 3 30% sublevels of lower or higher language knowledge. University • Minimun Age: All year round 14 years, 5 to 18 years in Summer Camps Ages: minimum age for ENFOREX schools is 14 years old; Cádiz, Málaga, Students Mexico, Pamplona & Tenerife 17 years old; Latin America 18 years old. • Maximum Age: None 24 Spanish Language schools in several of the most important and representative cities of Spain (Alicante, Barcelona, Cádiz, Granada, Madrid, What is included in the price? Málaga, Marbella, Pamplona, Salamanca, Sevilla, Tenerife & Valencia), All students who take more than one course in any ENFOREX school Latin America (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican within the same year, do not have to pay more than one application fee. Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico & Peru) and 9 international Summer Camps in Spain (Barcelona, Granada, Madrid, Marbella, Salamanca, Possibility of combining different locations with no extra fees following Sevilla & Valencia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Attached Documents, Which Includes the External Auditor's
    The attached documents, which includes the External Auditor’s Report, the Consolidated Financial Statements and Consolidated Management Report for the year ended on 31 December 2018, have been originally issued in Spanish. In the event of discrepancy, the Spanish-language version prevails. The individual Annual Accounts, have not been translated into English, so its publication will be exclusively in Spanish. Aena S.M.E., S.A. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Annual Accounts 31 December 2018 Consolidated Directors’ Report 2018 (With Independent Auditor's Report Thereon) (Free translation from the original in Spanish. In the event of discrepancy, the Spanish-language version prevails.) KPMG Auditores, S.L. Paseo de la Castellana, 259 C 28046 Madrid Independent Auditor's Report on the Consolidated Annual Accounts (Translation from the original in Spanish. In the event of discrepancy, the Spanish-language version prevails.) To the Shareholders of Aena S.M.E., S.A.: REPORT ON THE CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACCOUNTS Opinion __________________________________________________________________ We have audited the consolidated annual accounts of Aena S.M.E., S.A. (the "Parent") and subsidiaries (together the “Group”), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position at 31 December 2018, and the consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and consolidated notes. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated annual accounts give a true and fair view, in all material respects, of the consolidated equity and consolidated financial position of the Group at 31 December 2018 and of its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRS-EU) and other provisions of the financial reporting framework applicable in Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • KOD FLYGPLATS AAC Al Arish, Egypt
    KOD FLYGPLATS AAC Al Arish, Egypt – Al Arish Airport AAM Mala Mala Airport AAN Al Ain, United Arab Emirates – Al Ain Airport AAQ Anapa Airport – Russia AAT Altay, China – Altay Airport AAX Araxa, Brazil – Araxa Airport ABC Albacete, Spain – Albacete Airport ABE Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton International, PA, USA ABK Kabri Dar, Ethiopia – Kabri Dar Airport ABL Ambler, AK, USA ABM Bamaga, Queensland, Australia ABQ Albuquerque, NM, USA – Albuquerque International A ABR Aberdeen, SD, USA – Aberdeen Regional Airport ABS Abu Simbel, Egypt – Abu Simbel ABT Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia – Al Baha-Al Aqiq Airport ABV Abuja, Nigeria – Abuja International Airport ABX Albury, New South Wales, Australia – Albury ABY Albany, GA, USA – Dougherty County ABZ Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom – Dyce ACA Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico – Alvarez International ACC Accra, Ghana – Kotoka ACE Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain – Lanzarote ACH Altenrhein, Switzerland – Altenrhein Airport ACI Alderney, Channel Islands, United Kingdom – The Bl ACK Nantucket, MA, USA ACT Waco, TX, USA – Madison Cooper ACV Arcata, CA, USA – Arcata/Eureka Airport ACY Atlantic City /Atlantic Cty, NJ, USA – Atlantic Ci ADA Adana, Turkey – Adana ADB Izmir, Turkey – Adnan Menderes ADD Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – Bole ADE Aden, Yemen – Aden International Airport ADJ Amman, Jordan – Civil ADK Adak Island, Alaska, USA, Adak Island Airport ADL Adelaide, South Australia, Australia – Adelaide ADQ Kodiak, AK, USA ADZ San Andres Island, Colombia AED Aleneva, Alaska, USA – Aleneva Airport AEP Buenos Aires, Buenos
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Madrid to Valladolid
    1 INDEX INDEX THE COUNTRY 4 ONCE IN VALLADOLID: THE HOTEL 14 THE CITY 5 WHAT TO DO? 18 HOW TO GET TO VALLADOLID BY PLANE 6 WHAT TO BRING?21 HOW TO COME TO VALLADOLID CONTACT INFO 22 BY BUS OR TRAIN 10 2 3 THE CITY: VALLADOLID Valladolid, nicknamed Pucela, with 313,437 inhabitants, is one of the biggest cities in Spain. It has the THE COUNTRY: SPAIN BEST things of the big cities, but also the advantages of the small ones. It’s located in the north- central zone of Spain, upon the Pisuerga River and within the Ribera del Duero wine-making region. It’s the capital of the province of Valladolid and of the autonomous community of Castile and Leon. Valladolid preserves an important heritage of monuments in its old quarter, especially aristocratic houses and religious buildings. Outstanding among them is the unfinished Cathedral, the church of Santa María la Antigua, the 16th-Century Plaza Mayor, the Palace of Los Pimentel, San Pablo church and important theatres and museums, like the National Sculpture Museum and the Museum of Con- temporary Spanish Art. The city also preserves houses where great historical characters once lived, like Cervantes House, where the author of Quixote lived with his family, and Christopher Columbus House-Museum. Valladolid province is revealed through tours like those along the Red Wine Route and the Knight's Route. Everybody knows that BEST Spanish wines are located in our province, where you can find the Denominations of Origin Ribera del Duero, Cigales, Rueda and Toro. Valladolid offers a wide range of leisure and cultural opportunities, maybe that’s the reason why so many students from all over Europe decide to come to Valladolid.
    [Show full text]
  • Airports List
    Airport Code Airport Name AAE Annaba‐Rabah Bitat Airport AAL Aalborg Airport AMBA AAR Aarhus Airport ABE Lehigh Valley International Airport ABJ Abidjan International Airport ABQ Albuquerque International Airport ABZ Aberdeen Airport Ltd ACA Acapulco Airport ACC Kotoka International Airport ACE Lanzarote Airport ACH Altenrhein ‐ St Gallen Airport ACI Alderney Airport ACI Channel Islands ‐ Alderney Airport ACK Nantucket Memorial Airport ACY Atlantic City Int´l Airport ADA Adana‐Sakirpasa Airport ADB Izmir ‐ Adnan Menderes Airport ADD Addis Ababa ‐ Bole International Airport ADE Aden International Airport ADL Adelaide Airport ADZ San Andres ‐ Gustavo Rojas Pinilla Airport AEP Buenos Aires ‐ Aeroparque Jorge Newbery AES Alesund Airport AEX Alexandria International Airport AFA San Rafael Airport AFW Fort Worth Alliance Airport AGA Agadir ‐ Al Massira Airport AGB Augsburg Airport AGF Agen ‐ La Garenne Airport AGP Malaga Airport AGR Agra Airport AGS Augusta Regional Airport AHB Abha Airport AHN Athens Ben Epps Airport AHO Alghero‐Fertilia Airport AHU Al Hoceima ‐ Al Charif Al Idrissi Airport AJL Aizawl Airport AJA Ajaccio ‐ Campo Dell´Oro Airport AKL Auckland International Airport ALA Almaty Int´l Airport ALB Albany International Airport ALC Alicante Airport ALG Algiers‐Houari Boumedienne Airport ALO Waterloo Municipal Airport ALP Aleppo International Airport ALS Alamosa‐Bergman‐San Luis Valley Regional Airfield ALY Alexandria ‐ El Nhouza Airport AMA Amarillo ‐ Rick Husband International Airport AMD Ahmedabad ‐ Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel Int´l
    [Show full text]
  • “Impacto Del Traslado Del Aeropuerto En La Región De Murcia Frente Al Aeropuerto De Alicante”
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE GANDÍA Grado en Turismo “Impacto del traslado del aeropuerto en la Región de Murcia frente al aeropuerto de Alicante” TRABAJO FINAL DE GRADO Autora: Inmaculada Egea Jiménez Gandía, 2020 Resumen El turismo no se puede entender sin el movimiento de las personas a través del transporte aéreo, pieza fundamental para desplazarse cómoda y rápidamente entre puntos tanto del panorama nacional como internacional. Una infraestructura aeroportuaria adecuada crea un vínculo con los turistas que supone un impulso para las regiones donde se sitúan. Este trabajo final de grado tiene como objetivo estudiar el efecto que ha supuesto el cambio de aeropuerto en la Región de Murcia, trasladando los servicios aeroportuarios del Aeropuerto de Murcia-San Javier hacia el Aeropuerto Internacional Región de Murcia, tanto en la propia Región como frente a su competidor, situado a menos de 100 kilómetros de distancia, el Aeropuerto de Alicante-Elche. Este trabajo se enmarca dentro del contexto de la organización de la aviación a nivel estatal, repercutiendo en el eje aéreo que encontramos hoy en día en España. A partir de ahí, trataremos los tres aeropuertos mencionados y con ello, la determinación de las causas de la creación del nuevo aeropuerto en la Región de Murcia situado a tan solo 40 kilómetros de distancia y el devenir que este ha tenido, con el objetivo de ofrecer una visión global actual de la materia aeroportuaria en la Región. Palabras clave Aeropuerto Alicante-Elche, Aeropuerto Murcia-San Javier, Aeropuerto Internacional Región de Murcia, AENA, Región de Murcia. Abstract Tourism cannot be understood without the movement of people through air transport, a fundamental piece to move comfortably and quickly between points both nationally and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforex, Sevilla
    The soul of Spanish Spain & Latin America 10 20 8 32 2016 The Leading Spanish International University Pathway Colleges of Language Schools Summer Camps Programs in Spain Dates & Prices Spanish in Latin America in Spain Book at worldwide lowest price at: https://www.languagecourse.net/school-enforex-sevilla.php3 +1 646 503 18 10 +44 330 124 03 17 +34 93 220 38 75 +33 1-78416974 +41 225 180 700 +49 221 162 56897 +43 +31 858880253 +7 4995000466 +46 844 68 36 76 +47 219 30 570 +45 898 83 996 +39 02-94751194 +48 223 720116182 +81 345 895 399 +55 213 958 08 76 +86 19816218990 988 072 Enforex advantages +25 years of experience • Combine 10 different cities in Spain with no extra fees • Free change of school, destination, course or • Cultural activities and excursions to places of interest following the same academic program. Start dates every accommodation subject to availability, paying the price are organized in order to bring students closer to local Monday. difference if applicable (does not apply for Summer customs, festivals, food, culture, etc. Some activities are • Only one application fee: Students who take more than Camps). free and some have to be paid. one course within the same year at any Enforex school • Course break: 1 free week off for every 8 weeks of the • Student ID card, free fax reception service, e-mail and in Spain and/or Latin America will only have to pay one course (4-weeks advance notice required). post service. application fee. • Enforex student manual & school handbook with useful • Use of the computer & Internet room, Wi-fi connection, • Spanish classes are given from Monday to Friday (except information about the school, course contents, activities library and video room.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Public Support to Airlines and Airports: an Unsolved Puzzle
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCrea Regional public support to airlines and airports: an unsolved puzzle Ramón Núñez Sánchez January 20, 2015 Abstract This paper proposes a structural model to explain the motivation of regional public authorities to arrange marketing agreements for route and tra¢ c development. Furthermore, using data from Spanish airports, we empirically test this model obtaining the demand function according to the preferences of public authorities. The results show that the public budget, airport’s attributes or intermodal competition a¤ect to the demand for aircraft operations of regional public agencies. Finally, we propose an empirical method to determine the market power of airlines within these marketing agreements in a particular airport or route. 1 Introduction In recent years, some airports have experienced a signi…cant increase in air tra¢ c due to the liberalization in the air transport market. In some cases, this phenomenon has been related to the existence of new transport policy tools which aim to promote the use of airport infrastructure with idle capacity. In this way, an increasing number of regional airports have received the support of their regional governments through …nancial arrangements with air carriers in order to open new routes, as well as to provide advertising services linked to the permanence of the air carrier at a given airport. Indeed, airport managers have more incentives to negotiate long-term contracts with air carriers in order to reduce the risk of tra¢ c loss for their installations (Gillen, 2011).
    [Show full text]