EASA NPA Template

EASA NPA Template

Ref. Ares(2019)3139235 - 13/05/2019 Annex III to Final Report Revision of the SPI Regulation RMT.0679 – Surveillance, performance and interoperability December 2017 European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI Baseline Analysis Report RMT.0679 Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Version 20 – 9 November 2017 BASIC INFORMATION The rulemaking group for the Rulemaking Task 0679 “Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Implementing Rule” has initiated a series of activities to assess the scale of the issues with surveillance performance and interoperability in the EASA Member States. This provides a baseline scenario to describe the current situation and what would occur without new regulatory proposals. The assessment of the baseline scenario was supported by surveys sent to the EASA Advisory Bodies (see survey map below) on 22 July 2016. These surveys were completed with additional studies and reports when the answers were not sufficient to assess the scale of the problem. This results in a Baseline Analysis Report (BAR) to support the Regulatory Impact Assessment for RMT.0679. The Agency would like to thank very much all the respondent who have enable by their answers to understand more in depth this issue and all the persons who contributed to the studies performed for the RMT.0679. The Agency welcomes feedback on the evidences and estimates gathered in this report (contact: [email protected]). Disclaimer The number of answers to this survey cannot ensure that the results are representative of the sector. Therefore the interpretation of the results has to be cautious. The Agency strongly recommends that you contact us ([email protected]) for any questions on the usage of the survey. Survey map Support for: RMT.0679 Revision of Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Audience: ATM/ANS Providers Airspace Users Manufacturers NAAs, NSAs Military stakeholders Aviation associations Addressees: MABs, … Survey period: 22 July to 15 December 2016 Tools: EUSurvey website Emails with word and excel files Studies developed for this RMT. TE.RPRO.00034-004 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA intranet/Internet. Page 2 of 183 e An agency o the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Page 3 of 183 An agency of the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency Baseline Analysis Report – RMT.0679 Revision of SPI Table of contents 1. Background and report structure ............................................................................................................................... 7 2. Objective of this report: define and assess the scales of the problem(s) ................................................................... 7 3. The problems to be addressed ................................................................................................................................... 8 4. Overview of the outcomes of problems analysed .................................................................................................... 10 4.1. Problem area “lack of cost efficiency with the surveillance equipment” ....................................................... 10 4.2. Problem area “lack of sustainability of spectrum (with a special focus on 1030/1090MHz)” ........................ 11 4.3. Problem area “lack of surveillance performance and functionality targets” .................................................. 13 4.4. Problem area “lack of interoperability between surveillance equipment” .................................................... 13 4.5. Problem area “lack of security of transmitted surveillance data” .................................................................. 14 4.6. Interface with state aircraft and military surveillance .................................................................................... 14 4.7. Update of the problem tree ............................................................................................................................ 16 5. Baseline scenario ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 6. Future needs expressed by respondents .................................................................................................................. 17 7. Surveys: scope and answers overview...................................................................................................................... 18 7.1. General information on the sources used for this report ............................................................................... 18 7.2. Overview of the answers ................................................................................................................................. 19 7.3. SPISGA survey .................................................................................................................................................. 19 7.4. Surveillance data sharing survey ..................................................................................................................... 22 7.5. State aircraft, large aircraft and business aviation fleet survey ...................................................................... 23 7.6. VFR GA fleet survey ......................................................................................................................................... 24 7.7. Surveillance infrastructure survey .................................................................................................................. 25 7.8. Overview of the military responses ................................................................................................................ 26 7.9. Representativeness of the answers ................................................................................................................ 28 8. Lack of cost-efficiency for surveillance ..................................................................................................................... 29 8.1. Main outcomes ............................................................................................................................................... 29 8.2. General aspects ............................................................................................................................................... 30 8.3. Aircraft avionics ............................................................................................................................................... 30 8.3.1. Transponder capabilities for the fleet > 5700 kg MTOW under SPI IR ......................................................... 30 8.3.2. Compliance costs with SPI IR ........................................................................................................................ 30 8.3.3. General Aviation fleet ................................................................................................................................... 33 8.3.3.1 GA fleet based on EASA Survey 2016 ........................................................................................................... 33 8.4. Ground surveillance ........................................................................................................................................ 37 8.4.1. Ground surveillance assets ........................................................................................................................... 37 8.4.2. Ground surveillance maps ............................................................................................................................ 39 8.4.3. Civil ground surveillance costs (€) ................................................................................................................ 43 8.4.4. Surveillance in the en-route charges and airspace user expectations ......................................................... 44 9. Surveillance datasharing between ANSPs ................................................................................................................ 45 9.1. Main outcomes ............................................................................................................................................... 45 9.1.1. Conclusions for the problem definition ........................................................................................................ 45 9.1.2. Global analysis to support the conclusions .................................................................................................. 45 9.1.2.1 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between civil and MIL .......................................................... 45 9.1.2.2 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between civil ANSPs (same country) .................................... 46 9.1.2.3 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem between ANSPs at European level ....................................... 46 9.1.2.4 Conclusion on scale of data sharing problem with other entities than ANSPs ............................................ 47 9.2. Overview on received answers ......................................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    183 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us