DOCSLIB.ORG

New Notions in a Classic Classroom Applying Late Modern Sociolinguistics and Socially Informed SLA to Foreign Language Learner Data Ritzau, Ursula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Notions in a Classic Classroom Applying Late Modern Sociolinguistics and Socially Informed SLA to Foreign Language Learner Data Ritzau, Ursula New notions in a classic classroom Applying late modern sociolinguistics and socially informed SLA to foreign language learner data Ritzau, Ursula Publication date: 2014 Document version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Ritzau, U. (2014). New notions in a classic classroom: Applying late modern sociolinguistics and socially informed SLA to foreign language learner data. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN PhD thesis Ursula Ritzau New notions in a classic classroom. Applying late modern sociolinguistics and socially informed SLA to foreign language learner data. Name of department: Department of Scandinavian Studies and Linguistics Author: Ursula Ritzau Title / Subtitle: New notions in a classic classroom. Applying late modern sociolinguistics and socially informed SLA to foreign language learner data. Academic advisors: Juni S. Arnfast and Jens Normann Jørgensen Submitted: 11 April 2014 2 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Research questions ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Structure of the dissertation .................................................................................................................................. 10 2 THEORY ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Language in late modern sociolinguistics ............................................................................................................. 13 2.1.1 Critique of the ideology of separate languages ................................................................................................ 14 2.1.2 Repertoire ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.3 Languaging and polylanguaging ...................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Norms and ideologies ....................................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.5 Authentic language ........................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.6 Summary of language in late modern sociolinguistics ..................................................................................... 24 2.2 The chronological order of languages in SLA ..................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 L1, first language, native language, and mother tongue ................................................................................... 25 2.2.2 L2, second, and foreign languages ................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.3 L3, third, additional, and other languages ........................................................................................................ 30 2.2.4 Summary of the chronological order of language learning .............................................................................. 36 2.3 Classic second language learning studies ............................................................................................................. 36 2.3.1 Morpheme studies ............................................................................................................................................ 36 2.3.2 Interlanguage and native-speaker competence ................................................................................................. 37 2.3.3 Input and output ................................................................................................................................................ 39 2.3.4 Transfer ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 2.3.5 Summary of classic SLA studies ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.4 Second language learning strategies ..................................................................................................................... 42 2.4.1 Vocabulary learning strategies ......................................................................................................................... 44 2.4.2 What does it mean to know a word? ................................................................................................................ 45 2.4.3 Memorisation .................................................................................................................................................... 46 2.4.4 Learning vocabulary from reading or writing .................................................................................................. 47 2.4.5 Learning vocabulary from contrastive analysis and translation ....................................................................... 49 2.4.6 Learning vocabulary from songs ...................................................................................................................... 50 2.4.7 Learning vocabulary from combined strategies ............................................................................................... 51 2.4.8 Summary of vocabulary learning strategies ..................................................................................................... 52 2.5 Socially informed approaches to SLA .................................................................................................................. 53 2.5.1 Sociocultural theory and activity theory ........................................................................................................... 53 2.5.2 The ecology approach ....................................................................................................................................... 54 2.5.3 Chaos/complexity theory .................................................................................................................................. 55 2.5.4 The identity approach ....................................................................................................................................... 55 2.5.5 Summary of socially informed approaches to SLA ......................................................................................... 56 2.6 Identity work and positioning theory ................................................................................................................... 57 2.6.1 Positioning theory ............................................................................................................................................. 58 2.6.2 Positioning theory in SLA ................................................................................................................................ 59 3 2.7 Language learner beliefs ........................................................................................................................................ 61 2.7.1 Three approaches to studying beliefs ............................................................................................................... 63 2.7.2 Studies of dynamic beliefs ............................................................................................................................... 66 2.7.3 The use of learning journals in research on learner beliefs .............................................................................. 68 2.7.4 Summary of research on language learner beliefs ............................................................................................ 69 2.8 Sociolinguistics and SLA research ........................................................................................................................ 70 2.9 Summary of theoretical framework ..................................................................................................................... 74 3 METHODS .................................................................................................................... 77 3.1 Methodological background .................................................................................................................................. 77 3.2 The setting ............................................................................................................................................................... 80 3.2.1 German in Switzerland ..................................................................................................................................... 80 3.2.2 Danish and Scandinavian as study programmes .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar
    Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Draft comments welcome! Stefan Müller Bjarne Ørsnes [email protected] [email protected] Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften Freie Universität Berlin Friday 12th October, 2012 For Friederike ix Danish Danish is a North-Germanic language and belongs to the continental Scandinavian languages. Preface Its closest siblings are Norwegian (Bokmål) and Swedish. It is the official language of Denmark and also of the Faroe Islands (besides Faroese). It used to be an official language in Iceland, Greenland and the Virgin Islands. In Greenland Danish is still widely used in the administration. The aim of this book is twofold: First we want to provide a precise description of a large frag- Danish is spoken by approximately 5 million people in Denmark, but it is also spoken by mem- ment of the Danish language that is useful for readers regardless of the linguistic framework bers of the Danish minority in the region of Southern Schleswig and by groups in Greenland, they work in. This fragment comprises not only core phenomena such as constituent order and Norway and Sweden. Of course, there are also Danish-speaking immigrant groups all over the passivizating, but to a large extent also a number of less-studied phenomena which we believe world. to be of interest, not only for the description of Danish (and other mainland Scandinavian lan- Danish is an SVO-language like English, but it differs from English in being a V2-language guages), but also for comparative work in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Spoken Danish Less Intelligible Than Swedish? Charlotte Gooskens, Vincent J
    Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish? Charlotte Gooskens, Vincent J. van Heuven, Renée van Bezooijen, Jos J.A. Pacilly To cite this version: Charlotte Gooskens, Vincent J. van Heuven, Renée van Bezooijen, Jos J.A. Pacilly. Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish?. Speech Communication, Elsevier : North-Holland, 2010, 52 (11-12), pp.1022. 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.005. hal-00698848 HAL Id: hal-00698848 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00698848 Submitted on 18 May 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish? Charlotte Gooskens, Vincent J. van Heuven, Renée van Bezooijen, Jos J.A. Pacilly PII: S0167-6393(10)00109-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.005 Reference: SPECOM 1901 To appear in: Speech Communication Received Date: 3 August 2009 Revised Date: 31 May 2010 Accepted Date: 11 June 2010 Please cite this article as: Gooskens, C., van Heuven, V.J., van Bezooijen, R., Pacilly, J.J.A., Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish?, Speech Communication (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.005 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)
    <DOCINFO AUTHOR ""TITLE "Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present"SUBJECT "Impact 18"KEYWORDS ""SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> Germanic Standardizations Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General Editor Associate Editor Annick De Houwer Elizabeth Lanza University of Antwerp University of Oslo Advisory Board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 18 Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert and Wim Vandenbussche Germanic Standardizations Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert Monash University Wim Vandenbussche Vrije Universiteit Brussel/FWO-Vlaanderen John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements 8 of American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Germanic standardizations : past to present / edited by Ana Deumert, Wim Vandenbussche.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthographies in Grammar Books
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201807.0565.v1 Tomislav Stojanov, [email protected], [email protected] Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistic Republike Austrije 16, 10.000 Zagreb, Croatia Orthographies in Grammar Books – Antiquity and Humanism Summary This paper researches the as yet unstudied topic of orthographic content in antique, medieval, and Renaissance grammar books in European languages, as part of a wider research of the origin of orthographic standards in European languages. As a central place for teachings about language, grammar books contained orthographic instructions from the very beginning, and such practice continued also in later periods. Understanding the function, content, and orthographic forms in the past provides for a better description of the nature of the orthographic standard in the present. The evolution of grammatographic practice clearly shows the continuity of development of orthographic content from a constituent of grammar studies through the littera unit gradually to an independent unit, then into annexed orthographic sections, and later into separate orthographic manuals. 5 antique, 22 Latin, and 17 vernacular grammars were analyzed, describing 19 European languages. The research methodology is based on distinguishing orthographic content in the narrower sense (grapheme to meaning) from the broader sense (grapheme to phoneme). In this way, the function of orthographic description was established separately from the study of spelling. As for the traditional description of orthographic content in the broader sense in old grammar books, it is shown that orthographic content can also be studied within the grammatographic framework of a specific period, similar to the description of morphology or syntax.
    [Show full text]
  • From Semantics to Dialectometry
    Contents Preface ix Subjunctions as discourse markers? Stancetaking on the topic ‘insubordi- nate subordination’ Werner Abraham Two-layer networks, non-linear separation, and human learning R. Harald Baayen & Peter Hendrix John’s car repaired. Variation in the position of past participles in the ver- bal cluster in Duth Sjef Barbiers, Hans Bennis & Lote Dros-Hendriks Perception of word stress Leonor van der Bij, Dicky Gilbers & Wolfgang Kehrein Empirical evidence for discourse markers at the lexical level Jelke Bloem Verb phrase ellipsis and sloppy identity: a corpus-based investigation Johan Bos 7 7 Om-omission Gosse Bouma 8 Neural semantics Harm Brouwer, Mathew W. Crocker & Noortje J. Venhuizen 7 9 Liberating Dialectology J. K. Chambers 8 0 A new library for construction of automata Jan Daciuk 9 Generating English paraphrases from logic Dan Flickinger 99 Contents Use and possible improvement of UNESCO’s Atlas of the World’s Lan- guages in Danger Tjeerd de Graaf 09 Assessing smoothing parameters in dialectometry Jack Grieve 9 Finding dialect areas by means of bootstrap clustering Wilbert Heeringa 7 An acoustic analysis of English vowels produced by speakers of seven dif- ferent native-language bakgrounds Vincent J. van Heuven & Charlote S. Gooskens 7 Impersonal passives in German: some corpus evidence Erhard Hinrichs 9 7 In Hülle und Fülle – quantiication at a distance in German, Duth and English Jack Hoeksema 9 8 he interpretation of Duth direct speeh reports by Frisian-Duth bilin- guals Franziska Köder, J. W. van der Meer & Jennifer Spenader 7 9 Mining for parsing failures Daniël de Kok & Gertjan van Noord 8 0 Looking for meaning in names Stasinos Konstantopoulos 9 Second thoughts about the Chomskyan revolution Jan Koster 99 Good maps William A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in Accordance with Article 15 of the Charter
    Strasbourg, 19 February 2018 MIN-LANG (2018) PR 1 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Sixth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter GERMANY Sixth Report of the Federal Republic of Germany pursuant to Article 15 (1) of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages 2017 3 Table of contents A. PRELIMINARY REMARKS ................................................................................................................8 B. UPDATED GEOGRAPHIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ...............................................9 C. GENERAL TRENDS..........................................................................................................................10 I. CHANGED FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS......................................................................................................10 II. LANGUAGE CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 2014 .........................................................................................14 III. DEBATE ON THE CHARTER LANGUAGES IN THE GERMAN BUNDESTAG, JUNE 2017..............................14 IV. ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION CONFERENCE ...............................................................................................15 V. INSTITUTE FOR THE LOW GERMAN LANGUAGE, FEDERAL COUNCIL FOR LOW GERMAN ......................15 VI. BROCHURE OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR ....................................................................19 VII. LOW GERMAN IN BRANDENBURG.......................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Online Activation of L1 Danish Orthography Enhances Spoken Word Recognition of Swedish
    Nordic Journal of Linguistics (2021), page 1 of 19 doi:10.1017/S0332586521000056 ARTICLE Online activation of L1 Danish orthography enhances spoken word recognition of Swedish Anja Schüppert1 , Johannes C. Ziegler2, Holger Juul3 and Charlotte Gooskens1 1Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 716, 9700 AS Groningen, The Netherlands; Email: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive/CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, 3, place Victor Hugo, 13003 Marseille, France; Email: [email protected] 3Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Emil Holms Kanal 2, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark; Email: [email protected] (Received 6 June 2020; revised 9 March 2021; accepted 9 March 2021) Abstract It has been reported that speakers of Danish understand more Swedish than vice versa. One reason for this asymmetry might be that spoken Swedish is closer to written Danish than vice versa. We hypothesise that literate speakers of Danish use their ortho- graphic knowledge of Danish to decode spoken Swedish. To test this hypothesis, first- language (L1) Danish speakers were confronted with spoken Swedish in a translation task. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited to study the online brain responses dur- ing decoding operations. Results showed that ERPs to words whose Swedish pronunciation was inconsistent with the Danish spelling were significantly more negative-going than ERPs to words whose Swedish pronunciation was consistent with the Danish spelling between 750 ms and 900 ms after stimulus onset. Together with higher word-recognition scores for consistent items, our data provide strong evidence that online activation of L1 orthography enhances word recognition of spoken Swedish in literate speakers of Danish.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Selection (La S´Election Des Officiers)
    RTO-TR-034 AC/323(HFM-023)TP/26 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION RTO-TR-034 RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION BP 25, 7 RUE ANCELLE, F-92201 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE CEDEX, FRANCE RTO TECHNICAL REPORT 34 Officer Selection (la S´election des officiers) Final Report of the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Research and Study Group 31 on Officer Selection. Published May 2001 Distribution and Availability on Back Cover 7KLVSDJHKDVEHHQGHOLEHUDWHO\OHIWEODQN 3DJHLQWHQWLRQQHOOHPHQWEODQFKH RTO-TR-034 AC/323(HFM-023)TP/26 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION BP 25, 7 RUE ANCELLE, F-92201 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE CEDEX, FRANCE RTO TECHNICAL REPORT 34 Officer Selection (la S´election des officiers) Final Report of the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Research and Study Group 31 on Officer Selection. Authors/Co-authors: F. J. LESCREVE (BE) (RSG Chairman) J. ARABIAN (US), M. BAILEY (UK), W. BIRKE (GE), S. LAGACHE (FR), L. MCFARLANE (UK), S. MEINCKE (DE), B. SCHREURS (BE), B. THOMPSON (UK), H. M. VISSER (NE), D. WOYCHESHIN (CA) The Research and Technology Organization (RTO) of NATO RTO is the single focus in NATO for Defence Research and Technology activities. Its mission is to conduct and promote cooperative research and information exchange. The objective is to support the development and effective use of national defence research and technology and to meet the military needs of the Alliance, to maintain a technological lead, and to provide advice to NATO and national decision makers. The RTO performs its mission with the support of an extensive network of national experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the New Edition of Niels Ege's 1993 Translation Of
    Introduction to the New Edition of Niels Ege’s 1993 Translation of Rasmus Rask’s Prize Essay of 1818 Frans Gregersen To cite this version: Frans Gregersen. Introduction to the New Edition of Niels Ege’s 1993 Translation of Rasmus Rask’s Prize Essay of 1818. 2013. hprints-00786171 HAL Id: hprints-00786171 https://hal-hprints.archives-ouvertes.fr/hprints-00786171 Preprint submitted on 7 Feb 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Introduction to the New Edition of Niels Ege’s 1993 Translation of Rasmus Rask’s Prize Essay of 1818* 1. Introduction This edition constitutes a photographic reprint of the English edition of Rasmus Rask‘s prize essay of 1818 which appeared as volume XXVI in the Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague in 1993. The only difference, besides the new front matter, is the present introduction, which serves to introduce the author Rasmus Rask, the man and his career, and to contextualize his famous work. It also serves to introduce the translation and the translator, Niels Ege (1927–2003). The prize essay was published in Danish in 1818. In contrast to other works by Rask, notably his introduction to the study of Icelandic (on which, see further below), it was never reissued until Louis Hjelmslev (1899–1965) published a corrected version in Danish as part of his edition of Rask‘s selected works (Rask 1932).
    [Show full text]
  • An Update and Extension of the META-NET Study “Europe’S Languages in the Digital Age”
    An Update and Extension of the META-NET Study “Europe’s Languages in the Digital Age” Georg Rehm1, Hans Uszkoreit1, Ido Dagan2, Vartkes Goetcherian3, Mehmet Ugur Dogan4, Coskun Mermer4, Tamás Varadi5, Sabine Kirchmeier-Andersen6, Gerhard Stickel7, Meirion Prys Jones8, Stefan Oeter9, Sigve Gramstad10 META-NET META-NET META-NET META-NET DFKI GmbH Bar-Ilan University Arax Ltd. Tübitak Bilgem Berlin, Germany1 Tel Aviv, Israel2 Luxembourg3 Gebze, Turkey4 EFNIL, META-NET EFNIL, META-NET EFNIL NPLD Hungarian Academy of Sciences Danish Language Council Institut für Deutsche Sprache Network to Promote Ling. Diversity Budapest, Hungary5 Copenhagen, Denmark6 Mannheim, Germany7 Cardiff, Wales8 Council of Europe, Com. of Experts Council of Europe, Com. of Experts University of Hamburg Bergen, Norway10 Hamburg, Germany9 Abstract This paper extends and updates the cross-language comparison of LT support for 30 European languages as published in the META-NET Language White Paper Series. The updated comparison confirms the original results and paints an alarming picture: it demonstrates that there are even more dramatic differences in LT support between the European languages. Keywords: LR National/International Projects, Infrastructural/Policy Issues, Multilinguality, Machine Translation 1. Introduction and Overview This paper extends and updates one important result of the work carried out within the META-VISION pillar The multilingual setup of our European society im- of the initiative, the cross-language comparison of LT poses societal challenges on political, economic and support for 30 European languages as published in the social integration and inclusion, especially in the cre- META-NET Language White Paper Series (Rehm and ation of the single digital market and unified informa- Uszkoreit, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Nordic Region Speak with a FORKED Tongue?
    Does the Nordic Region Speak with a FORKED Tongue? The Queen of Denmark, the Government Minister and others give their views on the Nordic language community KARIN ARVIDSSON Does the Nordic Region Speak with a FORKED Tongue? The Queen of Denmark, the Government Minister and others give their views on the Nordic language community NORD: 2012:008 ISBN: 978-92-893-2404-5 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/Nord2012-008 Author: Karin Arvidsson Editor: Jesper Schou-Knudsen Research and editing: Arvidsson Kultur & Kommunikation AB Translation: Leslie Walke (Translation of Bodil Aurstad’s article by Anne-Margaret Bressendorff) Photography: Johannes Jansson (Photo of Fredrik Lindström by Magnus Fröderberg) Design: Mar Mar Co. Print: Scanprint A/S, Viby Edition of 1000 Printed in Denmark Nordic Council Nordic Council of Ministers Ved Stranden 18 Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K DK-1061 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 www.norden.org The Nordic Co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. Does the Nordic Region Speak with a FORKED Tongue? The Queen of Denmark, the Government Minister and others give their views on the Nordic language community KARIN ARVIDSSON Preface Languages in the Nordic Region 13 Fredrik Lindström Language researcher, comedian and and presenter on Swedish television.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish University Lecturers' Attitudes Towards English As the Medium of Instruction Ibérica, Núm
    Ibérica ISSN: 1139-7241 [email protected] Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos España Jensen, Christian; Thøgersen, Jacob Danish University lecturers' attitudes towards English as the medium of instruction Ibérica, núm. 22, 2011, pp. 13-33 Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos Cádiz, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287023888002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 01 IBERICA 22.qxp:Iberica 13 21/09/11 16:59 Página 13 Danish University lecturers’ attitudes towards English as the medium of instruction Christian Jensen and Jacob Thøgersen University of Copenhagen (Denmark) [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract The increasing use of English in research and higher education has been the subject of heated debate in Denmark and other European countries over the last years. This paper sets out the various positions in the national debate in Denmark, and then examines the attitudes towards these positions among the teaching staff at the country’s largest university. Four topics are extracted from the debate – one which expresses a positive attitude towards English and three independent but interrelated topics which express more negative attitudes. The responses from the university lecturers show that a majority agree with all positions, negative as well as positive. This finding indicates that the attitude may not form a simple one-dimensional dichotomy. The responses are broken down according to lecturer age and the proportion of teaching the lecturer conducts in English.
    [Show full text]