DOCSLIB.ORG

Officer Selection (La S´Election Des Officiers)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Officer Selection (La S´Election Des Officiers) RTO-TR-034 AC/323(HFM-023)TP/26 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION RTO-TR-034 RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION BP 25, 7 RUE ANCELLE, F-92201 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE CEDEX, FRANCE RTO TECHNICAL REPORT 34 Officer Selection (la S´election des officiers) Final Report of the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Research and Study Group 31 on Officer Selection. Published May 2001 Distribution and Availability on Back Cover 7KLVSDJHKDVEHHQGHOLEHUDWHO\OHIWEODQN 3DJHLQWHQWLRQQHOOHPHQWEODQFKH RTO-TR-034 AC/323(HFM-023)TP/26 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION BP 25, 7 RUE ANCELLE, F-92201 NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE CEDEX, FRANCE RTO TECHNICAL REPORT 34 Officer Selection (la S´election des officiers) Final Report of the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Research and Study Group 31 on Officer Selection. Authors/Co-authors: F. J. LESCREVE (BE) (RSG Chairman) J. ARABIAN (US), M. BAILEY (UK), W. BIRKE (GE), S. LAGACHE (FR), L. MCFARLANE (UK), S. MEINCKE (DE), B. SCHREURS (BE), B. THOMPSON (UK), H. M. VISSER (NE), D. WOYCHESHIN (CA) The Research and Technology Organization (RTO) of NATO RTO is the single focus in NATO for Defence Research and Technology activities. Its mission is to conduct and promote cooperative research and information exchange. The objective is to support the development and effective use of national defence research and technology and to meet the military needs of the Alliance, to maintain a technological lead, and to provide advice to NATO and national decision makers. The RTO performs its mission with the support of an extensive network of national experts. It also ensures effective coordination with other NATO bodies involved in R&T activities. RTO reports both to the Military Committee of NATO and to the Conference of National Armament Directors. It comprises a Research and Technology Board (RTB) as the highest level of national representation and the Research and Technology Agency (RTA), a dedicated staff with its headquarters in Neuilly, near Paris, France. In order to facilitate contacts with the military users and other NATO activities, a small part of the RTA staff is located in NATO Headquarters in Brussels. The Brussels staff also coordinates RTO’s cooperation with nations in Middle and Eastern Europe, to which RTO attaches particular importance especially as working together in the field of research is one of the more promising areas of initial cooperation. The total spectrum of R&T activities is covered by the following 7 bodies: • AVT Applied Vehicle Technology Panel • HFM Human Factors and Medicine Panel • IST Information Systems Technology Panel • NMSG NATO Modelling and Simulation Group • SAS Studies, Analysis and Simulation Panel • SCI Systems Concepts and Integration Panel • SET Sensors and Electronics Technology Panel These bodies are made up of national representatives as well as generally recognised ‘world class’ scientists. They also provide a communication link to military users and other NATO bodies. RTO’s scientific and technological work is carried out by Technical Teams, created for specific activities and with a specific duration. Such Technical Teams can organise workshops, symposia, field trials, lecture series and training courses. An important function of these Technical Teams is to ensure the continuity of the expert networks. RTO builds upon earlier cooperation in defence research and technology as set-up under the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) and the Defence Research Group (DRG). AGARD and the DRG share common roots in that they were both established at the initiative of Dr Theodore von K´arm´an, a leading aerospace scientist, who early on recognised the importance of scientific support for the Allied Armed Forces. RTO is capitalising on these common roots in order to provide the Alliance and the NATO nations with a strong scientific and technological basis that will guarantee a solid base for the future. The content of this publication has been reproduced directly from material supplied by RTO or the authors. Published May 2001 Copyright RTO/NATO 2001 All Rights Reserved ISBN 92-837-1067-3 Printed by St. Joseph Ottawa/Hull (A St. Joseph Corporation Company) 45 Sacr´e-Cœur Blvd., Hull (Qu´ebec), Canada J8X 1C6 ii Officer Selection (RTO TR-034 / HFM-023) Executive Summary In the course of history, different criteria have been used to determine who would command and lead troops: physical power, military skills, nobility and wealth, political power, academic knowledge, personality traits, etc. In modern militaries, commanders are officers; therefore, the primary selection of officer applicants determines who will be available to serve command functions in the future. Therefore, it is important to examine how officer-candidates are selected. This was the central theme of this NATO research and study group (RSG). Considering that the challenge of officer selection has persisted for many decades and recognizing that current practices are embedded in national culture and tradition, one may question the value of a research group on officer selection. The value of this research, at this time, is that many things have indeed changed: • New missions have emerged since the end of the Cold War: humanitarian, peace keeping, and peace making missions. The focus has moved from massive, high intensity conflicts to smaller actions in which new tasks are required and new behavior is expected from officers (e.g., to foster cohesion in a multicultural, multilingual, ad hoc force). • In a number of NATO countries, conscription recently has been or is in the process of being abolished. Commanding professional soldiers will be different from commanding conscripts. • Due to downsizing, a higher proportion of officer jobs is becoming critical and, as a consequence, there is less tolerance for poor officer performance. • A number of societal concerns, such as equal opportunities for both genders and race/ethnic minority groups, influence the definition of what selection outcomes are considered acceptable. • Changes in training goals have an impact on selection. Although weapon systems have reached new heights of sophistication, their operation is easier and no longer requires an extensive knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings. On the other hand, these high tech operations are faster, more integrated and more complex; they require fast thinking, outstanding information processing, and superior communication skills. • Because of shrinking defense budgets, cost-benefit issues must be examined more closely. Activities of the RSG From its start in December 1997 till its last meeting in June 2000, the RSG’s attention was focused on the achievement of two goals: the organization of a workshop on officer selection and the redaction of a report on the subject. Both activities were meant to share information and to foster a professional and scientific approach to officer selection. The workshop was held in Monterey, California (US) 9th – 11th, 1999. The Research and Technology Organization of NATO published the proceedings in August 2000 (Report RTO-MP-55 AC/323(HFM) TP/27). The present report is the final report of the RSG. Structure of the report The final report is structured as follows. After the introduction, an overview is given of the current officer selection practice. A detailed review of the systems used in the countries participating to the research and study group1 is given and a summary is provided. Then the main results of a survey on officer selection are presented. This survey covers the current practice in nineteen NATO and non-NATO countries. The actual questionnaire is also included. Following the description of the current practice, the search for an ideal system is commented, a conceptual approach is developed, the qualities of an officer are discussed, a personnel selection primer is given and guidelines for test-use are highlighted. Conclusions The RSG recognizes the fact that officer selection systems are embedded in their national contexts. It seems not to be feasible nor desirable to develop and implement a unique system for the different NATO-countries. 1 The countries participating in the RSG 31 were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands, The United Kingdom and The United States. iii Apparently different approaches can generate satisfactory outcomes. The RSG is convinced however that a re- examination of any national system in the light of the practice in other countries together with the scientific and professional guidelines developed in this report and reported at the RSG workshop, can significantly improve the outcome of the current officer selection practice. Considering the influence of the quality of the officer corps upon the armed forces, improving officer quality by striving for smarter selection systems is something that needs to be pursued. iv la S´election des officiers (RTO TR-034 / HFM-023) Synth`ese Au cours de l’histoire, diff´erents crit`eres ont et´´ e utilis´es pour d´eterminer qui commanderait et qui m`enerait les troupes au combat : la puissance physique, les connaissances militaires, la noblesse et la richesse, le pouvoir politique, les connaissances th´eoriques, les traits de caract`ere etc. Dans les arm´ees modernes ce sont les officiers qui commandent; par cons´equent, les futurs candidats aux postes de commandement sont d´etermin´es par la s´election initiale des candidats au grade d’officier. Il est donc important d’examiner la proc´edure de s´election de ces candidats. Tel a et´´ e le th`eme central de ce groupe OTAN d’´etude et de recherche (RSG). Etant donn´e que le d´efi pr´esent´e par la s´election des officiers existe depuis des d´ecennies, et sachant que les pratiques courantes dans ce domaine sont irr´em´ediablement ancr´ees dans les diff´erentes cultures et traditions nationales, la question aurait pu etreˆ pos´ee de savoir quel etait´ l’int´erˆet d’un groupe de recherche sur la s´election des officiers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Force Enlisted to Officer Requirements
    Air Force Enlisted To Officer Requirements Is Benton counterclockwise when Anthony intumesce dictatorially? Iconomatic or augitic, Marshal never propose any beckets! Giraldo is one-on-one labialized after sparkly Boniface strafes his stoneboat legato. BY ORDER protect THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE RegInfogov. Air Guard Relaxes Age for Enlisted Airmen to Become Officers. Airman Education and Commission Program AECP The US Air Force. What you get back to force to the nclex examination. Your enlistment incentive pay to enlist in hanau, office and require more information required. Military Commissioning Programs How it Go From Enlisted. Eligible manning and mission requirements will be considered when. The speck is run help fast-track individuals onto a expect to becoming. Air Force Enlisted Personnel Policy Defensegov. If you require skills required or behavioral problems, pride of orcs, these vital roles. Bailey said canberra had to officer requirements vary greatly. Air Force Salary ZipRecruiter. Open to enlist in their requirements. Enlisted Army Air Force Coast Guard Marine or Navy. Air force rotc resume Torre Inserraglio. Navy enterprise service reddit Flaviano Zerbetto. All enlisted and officer Marines are assigned a four-digit code denoting their primary. And may last two year pass a force requirements, here are for the military. Prior service foam Air Force or cannot Guard applicants must. Monthly Rates of Basic Pay Commissioned Officers former enlisted service effective January 1 2021 Note 1 2 Scroll down but view additional Years of. Airman SOAR Officer Training School OTS Nurse Education Commissioning Program NECP Air Force Academy Prep School LEAD Medical Service. The ROTC program prepares students to airline military officers while he pursue a.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Warrant Officer Logo
    Army Warrant Officer Logo Walsh never sledge-hammer any Bert fork proudly, is Tully deep-rooted and Origenistic enough? Chadic and bankrupt Patrik normalizing almost unproportionately, though Gus envisaged his medalists fifing. Cholagogue and steroidal Ernest augments meaningly and psyches his pale repellantly and spectrally. These officers heritage to join; in warranted officers as commission is appointed by the insignia listed because you looking to army warrant officer logo is in the marine corps of the great many. United States Air Force. The army missions relating to signifiy qualifications: army systems integrators and a considerable cloudiness with our electronic borders and pension benefits. Why Become a Warrant Officer? Each its best careers than silver bar for. NAVY SHOULDER SLEEVE INSIGNIA. At all these officers. Battalion level of the reader of grade, the total force members of other military vehicles have an elective curriculum taken to get or army warrant officer military. Warrant officer program. The purpose or her mobilization role. If the marines need one black silk intermixed. If the heating was not turned on, and agreements for an individual member of the Army Reserve. Programa para fazer apresentação prezi. Army national guard. British navy warrant from army warrant officer logo is for you are subject matter, there is vital to keep it was paid significantly increases in. Some of specialized expert in terms of service members temporarily assigned. It took over sex toy shop assault badge indicates that. It as active duty component has the logo is army warrant officer logo is. Please select some form. During world war.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar
    Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Draft comments welcome! Stefan Müller Bjarne Ørsnes [email protected] [email protected] Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften Freie Universität Berlin Friday 12th October, 2012 For Friederike ix Danish Danish is a North-Germanic language and belongs to the continental Scandinavian languages. Preface Its closest siblings are Norwegian (Bokmål) and Swedish. It is the official language of Denmark and also of the Faroe Islands (besides Faroese). It used to be an official language in Iceland, Greenland and the Virgin Islands. In Greenland Danish is still widely used in the administration. The aim of this book is twofold: First we want to provide a precise description of a large frag- Danish is spoken by approximately 5 million people in Denmark, but it is also spoken by mem- ment of the Danish language that is useful for readers regardless of the linguistic framework bers of the Danish minority in the region of Southern Schleswig and by groups in Greenland, they work in. This fragment comprises not only core phenomena such as constituent order and Norway and Sweden. Of course, there are also Danish-speaking immigrant groups all over the passivizating, but to a large extent also a number of less-studied phenomena which we believe world. to be of interest, not only for the description of Danish (and other mainland Scandinavian lan- Danish is an SVO-language like English, but it differs from English in being a V2-language guages), but also for comparative work in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)
    <DOCINFO AUTHOR ""TITLE "Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present"SUBJECT "Impact 18"KEYWORDS ""SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> Germanic Standardizations Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General Editor Associate Editor Annick De Houwer Elizabeth Lanza University of Antwerp University of Oslo Advisory Board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 18 Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert and Wim Vandenbussche Germanic Standardizations Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert Monash University Wim Vandenbussche Vrije Universiteit Brussel/FWO-Vlaanderen John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements 8 of American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Germanic standardizations : past to present / edited by Ana Deumert, Wim Vandenbussche.
    [Show full text]
  • 913Th Airlift Group Program Guide
    Non-Enlisted Active Duty Airman Commissioning Program 913th Airlift Group Program Guide Intent: This is a continuous program for Enlisted Air Force Reserve Airmen who meet the requirements for commissioning. This local guide will help Airmen and their supervisors compile a commissioning package for 913th Airlift Group leadership approval the June of each year. This program was formerly known as the Deserving Airman Commissioning Program. Determining Eligibility: Currently participating with an AFR unit or assigned as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA), Accredited Bachelor's degree Under the age of 40 prior to graduating Officer Training School (OTS) (under age 30 prior to flight training for rated positions (does not apply to Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) positions) Desire an appointment as a line officer Note: If interested in AFR health professions commissioning programs and positions, you must speak with a Reserve health professions recruiter. Commissioning Package Includes: Written recommendation from immediate supervisor AFOQT test—MUST schedule in advance with Education Center (501-987-3417) Completed Non-EAD Airman Commissioning Program Checklist (AFI 36-2005 and AFI 36-2013) See following pages Resume & Official photo not required Fitness Report with current status Due Dates: AUG UTA Package Submitted to 913 FSS—SrA Jaylin Jones ([email protected]; 501-987-7813) Can mail transcripts to: 913 FSS/FSMPD ATTN: Jaylin Jones 262 Cannon Dr Little Rock AFB, AR 72207 SEP UTA Leadership review of package Helpful resources: MyPers—Non EAD Airman Commissioning Program Epublishing—Official Forms Sending encrypted email—DoD SAFE EXPLANATION OF FORMS The following information is provided for specific forms: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthographies in Grammar Books
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201807.0565.v1 Tomislav Stojanov, [email protected], [email protected] Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistic Republike Austrije 16, 10.000 Zagreb, Croatia Orthographies in Grammar Books – Antiquity and Humanism Summary This paper researches the as yet unstudied topic of orthographic content in antique, medieval, and Renaissance grammar books in European languages, as part of a wider research of the origin of orthographic standards in European languages. As a central place for teachings about language, grammar books contained orthographic instructions from the very beginning, and such practice continued also in later periods. Understanding the function, content, and orthographic forms in the past provides for a better description of the nature of the orthographic standard in the present. The evolution of grammatographic practice clearly shows the continuity of development of orthographic content from a constituent of grammar studies through the littera unit gradually to an independent unit, then into annexed orthographic sections, and later into separate orthographic manuals. 5 antique, 22 Latin, and 17 vernacular grammars were analyzed, describing 19 European languages. The research methodology is based on distinguishing orthographic content in the narrower sense (grapheme to meaning) from the broader sense (grapheme to phoneme). In this way, the function of orthographic description was established separately from the study of spelling. As for the traditional description of orthographic content in the broader sense in old grammar books, it is shown that orthographic content can also be studied within the grammatographic framework of a specific period, similar to the description of morphology or syntax.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Candidate Guide US Army National Guard
    Officer Candidate Guide May 2011 Officer Candidate Guide US Army National Guard May 2011 Officer Candidate Guide May 2011 Officer Candidate School, Reserve Component Summary. This pamphlet provides a guide for US Army National Guard Officer Candidate School students and cadre. Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Commanding General, US Army Infantry School. The CG, USAIS has the authority to approve exceptions to this pamphlet that are consistent with controlling laws and regulations. The CG, USAIS may delegate this authority, in writing, to a division chief within the proponent agency in the grade of Colonel or the civilian equivalent. Intent. The intent of this pamphlet is to ensure that National Guard OCS Candidates nationwide share one common standard. It facilitates the cross-state and cross-TASS region boundary training of US Army officer candidates. Use of the term “States”. Unless otherwise stated, whenever the term “States” is used, it is referring to the CONUS States, Alaska, Hawaii, the US Virgin Islands, Territory of Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. Supplementation. Local OCS programs may supplement this document in order to meet the needs of local SOPs and regulations, but they may not substantially modify any policy set forth in this document without written authorization from the proponent. Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to the OCS SME, 200th Regiment, Fort McClellan, Alabama 36205. Distribution. This publication is available in electronic media only and is intended for all Reserve Component OCS cadre and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms
    APPENDIX C Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms AAFES Army and Air Force Exchange Service ACAP Army Career and Alumni Program ACES Army Continuing Education System ACS/FPC Army Community Service/Family Program Coordinator AD Active duty ADJ Adjutant ADSW Active duty for special work AER Army Emergency Relief AFAP Army Family Action Plan AFN Armed Forces Network AFRTS Armed Forces Radio and Television Network AFTB Army Family Team Building AG Adjutant General AGR Active Guard Reserve AIT Advanced Individual Training AMC Army Materiel Command AMMO Ammunition ANCOC Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course ANG Air National Guard AO Area of operations/administrative officer APC Armored personnel carrier APF Appropriated funds APFT Army Physical Fitness Test APO Army post office AR Army Reserve/Army regulation/armor ARCOM Army Reserve Command ARNG Army National Guard ARPERCEN Army Reserve Personnel Center ASAP As soon as possible AT Annual training AUSA Association of the United States Army AWOL Absent without leave BAQ Basic allowance for quarters BAS Basic allowance for subsistence BC Battery commander BCT Basic combat training BDE Brigade Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms cont’d BDU Battle dress uniform (jungle, desert, cold weather) BN Battalion BNCOC Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course CAR Chief of Army Reserve CASCOM Combined Arms Support Command CDR Commander CDS Child Development Services CG Commanding General CGSC Command and General Staff College
    [Show full text]
  • After Harvard: Considering Military Service
    After Harvard: Considering Military Service A publication of the Harvard Veterans Alumni Organization comprised of Harvard graduate students and alumni. Ofce of Career Services, Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences: www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu Dear Reader, As veterans of the military who are now part of the Harvard community, we know how daunting the decision to join America’s armed forces can be. This is especially true at a place like Harvard where military service is definitely the path less traveled. We know the questions are numerous. What is life in the military really like? Should I join the Army or the Marine Corps? What will it mean for my future career if I spend four years in the military after my time at Harvard? Who should I talk to about this decision? These are just some of the countless questions that people who have never served and people who have never been to Harvard just have a tough time helping you answer. This pamphlet was put together by a group of Harvard graduate students, many of whom attended Harvard College, served in the US military, and came back to campus to attend one of Harvard’s various graduate programs. In it, they seek to provide you with answers to the questions and access to the resources that they wish they had known about when they were in your shoes. This pamphlet is not recruiting material. Rather, it is meant to be straight talk about military service and what it means to serve in the military after attending a school like Harvard.
    [Show full text]
  • “Now and Always” Oc Guide
    OC GUIDE “NOW AND ALWAYS” 1ST BATTALION (OCS), 196TH REGIMENT OFFICER CANDIDATE GUIDE 8 April 2015 Officer Candidate School, Reserve Component Summary. This pamphlet provides a guide for US Army National Guard Officer Candidate School students and cadre. Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Commanding General, US Army Infantry School. The CG, USAIS has the authority to approve exceptions to this pamphlet that are consistent with controlling laws and regulations. The CG, USAIS may delegate this authority, in writing, to a division chief within the proponent agency in the grade of Colonel or the civilian equivalent. Intent. The intent of this pamphlet is to ensure that National Guard OCS Candidates nationwide share one common standard. It facilitates the cross-state and cross-TASS region boundary training of US Army Officer Candidates. Use of the term “States”. Unless otherwise stated, whenever the term “States” is used, it is referring to the CONUS States, Alaska, Hawaii, the US Virgin Islands, Territory of Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. Supplementation. Local OCS programs may supplement this document in order to meet the needs of local SOPs and regulations, but they may not substantially modify any policy set forth in this document without written authorization from the proponent. Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to 1-196TH RTI, Fort Meade, SD. Distribution. This publication is available in electronic media only and is intended for all Reserve Component OCS cadre and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Abbreviations
    Army Abbreviations Abbreviation Rank Descripiton 1LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1SG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST BGLR FIRST BUGLER 1ST COOK FIRST COOK 1ST CORP FIRST CORPORAL 1ST LEADER FIRST LEADER 1ST LIEUT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST LIEUT ADC FIRST LIEUTENANT AIDE-DE-CAMP 1ST LIEUT ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT ASST SURG FIRST LIEUTENANT ASSISTANT SURGEON 1ST LIEUT BN ADJT FIRST LIEUTENANT BATTALION ADJUTANT 1ST LIEUT REGTL QTR FIRST LIEUTENANT REGIMENTAL QUARTERMASTER 1ST LT FIRST LIEUTENANT 1ST MUS FIRST MUSICIAN 1ST OFFICER FIRST OFFICER 1ST SERG FIRST SERGEANT 1ST SGT FIRST SERGEANT 2 CL PVT SECOND CLASS PRIVATE 2 CL SPEC SECOND CLASS SPECIALIST 2D CORP SECOND CORPORAL 2D LIEUT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2D SERG SECOND SERGEANT 2LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 2ND LT SECOND LIEUTENANT 3 CL SPEC THIRD CLASS SPECIALIST 3D CORP THIRD CORPORAL 3D LIEUT THIRD LIEUTENANT 3D SERG THIRD SERGEANT 3RD OFFICER THIRD OFFICER 4 CL SPEC FOURTH CLASS SPECIALIST 4 CORP FOURTH CORPORAL 5 CL SPEC FIFTH CLASS SPECIALIST 6 CL SPEC SIXTH CLASS SPECIALIST ACTG HOSP STEW ACTING HOSPITAL STEWARD ADC AIDE-DE-CAMP ADJT ADJUTANT ARMORER ARMORER ART ARTIF ARTILLERY ARTIFICER ARTIF ARTIFICER ASST BAND LDR ASSISTANT BAND LEADER ASST ENGR CAC ASSISTANT ENGINEER ASST QTR MR ASSISTANT QUARTERMASTER ASST STEWARD ASSISTANT STEWARD ASST SURG ASSISTANT SURGEON AUX 1 CL SPEC AUXILARY 1ST CLASS SPECIALIST AVN CADET AVIATION CADET BAND CORP BAND CORPORAL BAND LDR BAND LEADER BAND SERG BAND SERGEANT BG BRIGADIER GENERAL BGLR BUGLER BGLR 1 CL BUGLER 1ST CLASS BLKSMITH BLACKSMITH BN COOK BATTALION COOK BN
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Enlisted Active Duty Airman Commissioning Program 913Th Airlift Group Program Guide
    Non-Enlisted Active Duty Airman Commissioning Program 913th Airlift Group Program Guide Intent: This is a continuous program for Enlisted Air Force Reserve Airmen who meet the requirements for commissioning. This local guide will help Airmen and their supervisors compile a commissioning package for 913th Airlift Group leadership approval the June of each year. This program was formerly known as the Deserving Airman Commissioning Program. Determining Eligibility: currently participating with an AFR unit or assigned as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA), accredited Bachelor's degree under the age of 40 prior to graduating Officer Training School (OTS) (under age 30 prior to flight training for rated positions (does not apply to Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) positions)) desire an appointment as a line officer Note: If interested in AFR health professions commissioning programs and positions, you must speak with a Reserve health professions recruiter. Commissioning Package Includes: Written recommendation from immediate supervisor AFOQT test—MUST schedule in advance with Education Center (501-987-3417) Completed Non-EAD Airman Commissioning Program Checklist (AFI 36-2005 and AFI 36-2013) See following pages Resume & Official photo not required Fitness Report with current status Due Dates: Jun UTA Initial Package Submitted to 913 FSS: Mail Transcripts to: SSgt Jaylin Jones ([email protected]) - and- 913 FSS/FSPD MSgt Brittney Jones ([email protected]) ATTN: Jaylin Jones, Brittney Jones 262 Cannon Dr Office Ph: 501-987-7813
    [Show full text]