2- MARINE ORGANISMS the Oceans Are Representing the Largest Living Space on the Planet Today and Throughout Earth's History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2- MARINE ORGANISMS the Oceans Are Representing the Largest Living Space on the Planet Today and Throughout Earth's History BTEC 4386 IUG 2- MARINE ORGANISMS The oceans are representing the largest living space on the planet today and throughout Earth's history. The creatures that inhabit the wide sea are diverse in both shape and form. The oceans and the coastal seas provide a complex variety of environments for living organisms. At the surface, conditions range from polar to tropical, over depth from light to total and constant darkness and the sea floor may be rock, sand, or rood. Organisms of the marine environment have much in common with the organisms of the land, but they also have very different survival problems and have developed unique solutions to cope with them. Life in the water ranges from microscopic, single celled organisms to the largest fish and the greatest whale. CLASSIFICATIN OF ORGANISMS A wide variety of the organisms inhabit the environment of the ocean. All organisms are classified and placed in groups to promote identification and to increase understanding of the relationships that exists among them. KINGDOMS OF LIFE IN THE SEA The Five-Kingdom System Since the time of Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778), many new organisms have been discovered, and many classification systems have been proposed. Some of the systems have merit; all try to make sense of the great diversity of life on our planet. However, most scientists now use the classification system that is composed of five kingdoms. (See the Table) TABLE THE FIVE-KINGDOM CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Monera: This group, commonly called the monerans, includes the bacteria and blue-green bacteria (formerly called blue-green algae). Bacteria are structurally simple microorganisms that are especially significant as decomposers, breaking down organic compounds into nutrients that can be used by other organisms. They are also an important food source and help degrade pollutants. Some species are autotrophic, and account for much of the oceanic primary production. All bacteria are single- celled; all lack a nuclear membrane and thus their nuclear material is dispersed throughout the cell. Scientists call organisms that lack a nuclear membrane prokaryotes. Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic bacteria widely distributed in the marine environment. 6 BTEC 4386 IUG Protista: The kingdom of protists includes mostly single-celled, or unicellular, organisms, although some are composed of many cells or live together in small colonies. All protists have their nuclear material enclosed within a membrane; that is, they have a nucleus. Scientists call organisms with this feature eukaryotes. (All organisms on Earth other than those in the kingdom Monera are eukaryotes.) Tiny protozoa (animal-like organisms) and many kinds of algae (plantlike organisms) make up this group. Diatoms Diatoms (phylum Bacillariophyta) are unicellular, though many species aggregate into chains or star-like groups. These protists usually float and drift near the ocean surface. Diatoms are part of the ocean’s community of plankton (meaning “wanderers” that drift, rather than swim) and are more accurately classified as phytoplankton (“plant wanderers”). Some diatoms (called encrusting diatoms) live attached to solid substrates, while others alternate between attached and free-floating forms. The cell walls of diatoms are made of silica. After their death, they sink to greater depths building up siliceous sediments called the siliceous ooze. Dinoflagellates (dino for “whirling” and flagellum for “whip”) Members of another protist group often found near the ocean’s surface are the dinoflagellates. Three types of dinoflagellates are shown in the next Figure. They are classified in phylum Dinoflagellata or Pyrrophyta, which means “red (or fire) algae.” How do dinoflagellates compare with diatoms? Dinoflagellates have two flagella. Dinoflagellates also possess chloroplasts and, like diatoms, are able to make and store their own food. Many dinoflagellate species have an eyespot that is sensitive to light. They use the eyespot to move toward the light, thus increasing their ability to make food. Unlike diatoms, dinoflagellates are also able to take in food. The cell walls of dinoflagellates and diatoms differ in structure and composition. Dinoflagellate cell walls are made of cellulose like those of plants, not of silica like those of diatoms. A cellulose cell wall is not as transparent as a diatom’s glassy cell wall. 7 BTEC 4386 IUG Seaweeds What do ice cream and toothpaste have in common? It may surprise you to learn that both products contain substances that come originally from seaweed. Seaweeds are multicellular algae that live in the sunlit waters of the ocean. Organisms that are multicellular are made up of more than one cell. More than 500 species of macroscopic algae live in the ocean. These algae are classified according to the color of the pigments in their cells. The three main groups classified in this way are the green algae, brown algae, and red algae. People harvest seaweeds as a useful source of food, food additives, and agricultural fertilizer. The annual harvest of North American kelp weighs some 20,000 tons. Three types of green algae. 8 BTEC 4386 IUG Three types of brown algae. Three types of red algae. PROTOZOANS Thousands of species of protozoans are found living on the surface of marine substrates and in the bottom sediments. These one-celled organisms are classified within the protist kingdom, along with the algae. The protozoa are subdivided into three major groups: the Ciliophora, Zoomastigina, and Sarcodina. The Ciliophora are the largest group of protozoa, composed of thousands of freshwater and marine species, all having cilia. 9 BTEC 4386 IUG The Zoomastigina consist of a group of animal-like protists that move through the water by means of whiplike flagella. Included in this group are the euglena and the dinoflagellates, which take in (as well as make their own) food. The Sarcodina are the protozoan group that includes the forams and radiolarians, as well as the amoebas. They live on the surface of substrates and move by means of cytoplasmic extensions called pseudopods (meaning “false feet”). This kind of movement, typical of the amoeba, is called ameboid movement. Foraminiferan: The foraminiferan (meaning “hole-bearing”), or foram for short, is a unicellular protist. Forams are encased in a shell, or test, made up of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Parts of a foram’s cytoplasm flow out through holes, or pores, in the shell and form a sticky surface for catching food. Radiolarian. A unicellular zooplankton. It is transparent because its cell wall (like that of a diatom) is composed of silica. Long spines branch out from a radiolarian’s body, like the spokes of a wheel, for added buoyancy and protection. Foraminiferan Radiolarian Fungi: The fungi include both unicellular and multicellular eukaryotic organisms that are not able to make their own food. Fungi absorb their nutrients from dead organic material and live tissues. Like plant cells, fungal cells are enclosed by a rigid cell wall. Unlike plants, fungi do not contain the green pigment chlorophyll. Fungi play an important role in breaking down dead organisms and recycling organic material. Hundreds of species of fungi exist, both on land and in the ocean. Plantae: Plants are multicellular, eukaryotic organisms that are able to make their own food out of simple chemical substances. Sea grasses are the only land plants that have fully adapted to life under the sea. They grow submerged, and their flowers produce pollen grains that drift through the water to reach and pollinate other flowers. They release their seeds underwater, too. Animalia: Animals are multicellular, eukaryotic organisms. Unlike plants, animals are not able to make their own food, but must instead eat plants or other animals to obtain their nutrients. Most animals are capable of movement. We categorize animals in two main groups: those that lack a backbone and skull (the invertebrates) and those that have a backbone and skull (the vertebrates). Both groups are widely represented by animals that live in marine environments. MARINE INVERTEBRATES More than 95 percent of marine animal species do not have backbones; they are invertebrates. They range in size from the miniature fauna living in the seabed sediment and tiny zooplankton drifting in surface waters, to giant squid that reach 18 m long. Marine invertebrates belong to about 30 different groups called phyla (singular phylum), with each phylum-containing species sharing many features in common. 10 BTEC 4386 IUG SPONGES, ROTIFERS, AND BRYOZOANS Each belong to distinct phylum of marine invertebrates. Although each group of species is unique enough to be placed in its own phylum, they do share some characteristics. Rotifers and bryozoans are both microscopic, but sponges can grow quite large. Sponges and bryozoans are both sedentary, but rotifers are capable of movement. However, the animals found in all three groups are multicellular, bottom- dwelling invertebrates. Sponges Sponges (phylum Porifera meaning “pore bearing”) are the simplest multicellular invertebrates. In structure a sponge is little more than a sac with pores. Inside, lining a central cavity, are cells with beating hairlike structures called cilia that create miniature water currents. These draw food particles into the sac through the pores. Sponges show a variety of interesting shapes, sizes, and colors. The bath sponge (Euspongia), which lives in warm tropical waters, may be most familiar to you. The traditional bath sponge which is the skeleton of the sponge is now threatened because of overharvesting. The beautiful Venus’s flower basket (Euplectella), which lives at great depths, is a tubular sponge composed of a delicate network of glassy spicules. The vase sponge (Ircinia), found on sandy bottoms near coral reefs, grows vertically. Some basket sponges, found in tropical waters, grow so large that a person could sit inside of them. Rotifers Meaning “wheel bearer”, dozens of rotifer species live in the moist sands along the shore and in the gravel of aquarium tanks. (Rotifers are also common in freshwater.) Rotifers, which are in their own unique phylum Rotifera, are able to change the shape of their body.
Recommended publications
  • Regulatory Circuit Rewiring and Functional Divergence of the Duplicate Admp Genes in Dorsoventral Axial Patterning
    Developmental Biology 410 (2016) 108–118 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/developmentalbiology Evolution of Developmental Control Mechanisms Regulatory circuit rewiring and functional divergence of the duplicate admp genes in dorsoventral axial patterning Yi-Cheng Chang a,b, Chih-Yu Pai a, Yi-Chih Chen a, Hsiu-Chi Ting a, Pedro Martinez c,d, Maximilian J. Telford e, Jr-Kai Yu a, Yi-Hsien Su a,b,n a Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan b Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan c Department de Genètica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain d Institució de Recerca I Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain e Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK article info abstract Article history: The spatially opposed expression of Antidorsalizing morphogenetic protein (Admp) and BMP signals Received 18 December 2015 controls dorsoventral (DV) polarity across Bilateria and hence represents an ancient regulatory circuit. Accepted 18 December 2015 Here, we show that in addition to the conserved admp1 that constitutes the ancient circuit, a second Available online 21 December 2015 admp gene (admp2) is present in Ambulacraria (EchinodermataþHemichordata) and two marine worms Keywords: belonging to Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha. The phylogenetic distribution implies that the two admp BMP genes were duplicated in the Bilaterian common ancestor and admp2 was subsequently lost in chordates Admp and protostomes. We show that the ambulacrarian admp1 and admp2 are under opposite transcriptional Sea urchin control by BMP signals and knockdown of Admps in sea urchins impaired their DV polarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemichordate Phylogeny: a Molecular, and Genomic Approach By
    Hemichordate Phylogeny: A molecular, and genomic approach by Johanna Taylor Cannon A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 4, 2014 Keywords: phylogeny, evolution, Hemichordata, bioinformatics, invertebrates Copyright 2014 by Johanna Taylor Cannon Approved by Kenneth M. Halanych, Chair, Professor of Biological Sciences Jason Bond, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Leslie Goertzen, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Scott Santos, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Abstract The phylogenetic relationships within Hemichordata are significant for understanding the evolution of the deuterostomes. Hemichordates possess several important morphological structures in common with chordates, and they have been fixtures in hypotheses on chordate origins for over 100 years. However, current evidence points to a sister relationship between echinoderms and hemichordates, indicating that these chordate-like features were likely present in the last common ancestor of these groups. Therefore, Hemichordata should be highly informative for studying deuterostome character evolution. Despite their importance for understanding the evolution of chordate-like morphological and developmental features, relationships within hemichordates have been poorly studied. At present, Hemichordata is divided into two classes, the solitary, free-living enteropneust worms, and the colonial, tube- dwelling Pterobranchia. The objective of this dissertation is to elucidate the evolutionary relationships of Hemichordata using multiple datasets. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to Hemichordata and outlines the objectives for the dissertation research. Chapter 2 presents a molecular phylogeny of hemichordates based on nuclear ribosomal 18S rDNA and two mitochondrial genes. In this chapter, we suggest that deep-sea family Saxipendiidae is nested within Harrimaniidae, and Torquaratoridae is affiliated with Ptychoderidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of ZOOLOGY Museum Specimens
    P.E. Society’s Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce Ganesh-Khind, Pune – 411 053 http://www.moderncollegegk.org Department of ZOOLOGY Museum Specimens 1 Phylum Porifera 2 SyconSycon n Kingdom: Animalia n Phylum: Porifera n Class: Pharetronida n Order: Sycettida n Genus: Sycon n General Characteristics: Sycon is a genus of calcareous sponges. These sponges are small, growing up to 5 cm in total length, and are tube- shaped and often white to cream in colour. The surface is hairy and spiky tufts of stiff spicules surround the osculum. 3 SpongillaSpongilla n Kingdom: Animalia n Phylum: Porifera n Class: Demospongiae n Order: Haplosclerida n Genus: Spongilla n General Characteristics: Spongilla dwells in lakes and slow streams. Spongilla attach themselves to rocks and logs and filter the water for various small aquatic organisms such as protozoa, bacteria, and other free-floating pond life. fresh-water sponges are exposed to far more adverse and variable environmental conditions, and therefore they have developed gemmules as a means of dormancy. When exposed to excessively cold or otherwise harsh situations, the sponges form these gemmules, which are highly resistant "buds" that can live dormantly after the mother sponge has died. When conditions improve, the gemmules will "germinate" and a new sponge is born. 4 Phylum Coelenterata 5 JellyJelly fishfish n Kingdom: Animalia n Phylum: Coelentrata n Subphylum: Medusozoa n Class: Scyphozoa n Order: Semaeostomeae n Genus: Aurelia n General Characteristics: Jellyfish are free-swimming members. Jellyfish have several different morphologies that represent several different cnidarian Jellyfish are found in every ocean, from the surface to the deep sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Vertebrates
    Early Vertebrates Readings in Chapter 2, 3, and 7. Using the Tree of Life Web Project • www. tolweb. org – A project to put the entire tree of life, a phylogeny of all life, on the web. – Biologists world-wide contribute phylogenies to the project, thus building the tree and making the information accessible to everyone. • Animal Diversity Web; httppy://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata By Phil Myers Members of this Phylum • Chordates are defined as organisms that possess a structure called a notochord, at least during some part of their development. The notochord is a rod that extends most of the length of the body when it is fully developed. Lying dorsal to the gut but ventral to the central nervous system, it stiffens the body and acts as support during locomotion. • Other characteristics shared by chordates include the following (from Hickman and Roberts, 1994): – Notochord; – single, dorsal, hollow nerve cord, usually with an enlarged anterior end (brain); – pharyngeal pouches present at some stage of development; – tail ppjrojectin g be yond (posterior to ) the anus at some sta ge of development; – bilateral symmetry; – segmented body, including segmented muscles; MYOMERES – three germ layers and a well-developed coelom; – ventral heart, with dorsal and ventral blood vessels and a closed blood system – complete digestive system – bony or cartilaginous endoskeleton usually present. • Contributors Phil Myers (author), Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan. 2007/08/12 03:08:08.028 GMT-4 To cite this page: Myers, P. 2001. "Chordata" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed September 06, 2007 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Chordata.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    Founded in 1888 as the Marine Biological Laboratory Catalyst SPRING 2012 VOLUME 7, NUMBER 1 IN THIS ISSUE 4 All Species, Great and Small 8 Microbial Diversity, Leaf by Leaf 10 Life, Literature, and the Pursuit of Global Access BIODIVERSITY: Exploring Life on Earth Page 2 F R OM THE D ir ECTO R MBL Catalyst Dear Friends, SPRING 2012 VOLUME 7, NUMBER 1 In February, a group of MBL trustees, overseers, and friends took a memorable MBL Catalyst is published twice yearly by the Office of “eco-expedition” by safari through East Africa. For most of us, the most exciting Communications at the Marine Biological Laboratory aspect was seeing the megafauna – giraffes, zebras, lions, warthogs, wildebeests, (MBL) in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. The MBL is rhinoceroses—roaming wild in a pristine landscape. Except in tropical Asia, these dedicated to scientific discovery and improving the human condition through research and education large, charismatic animals aren’t found anywhere else on the planet—not in the in biology, biomedicine, and environmental science. Americas, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. Founded in 1888, the MBL is an independent, nonprofit corporation. Why did they disappear? The reasons are debated, but there is good evidence Senior Advisors that overkill by prehistoric humans caused major losses. Unfortunately, the near- President and Director: Gary Borisy Chief Academic and extinction of these species 10,000 to 50,000 years ago is not the end of the story. Scientific Officer: Joshua Hamilton It is generally agreed that the Earth is facing another biodiversity crisis in this Director of External Relations: Pamela Clapp Hinkle century, with extinctions largely driven by destruction of habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Proof
    JrnlID 12526_ArtID 933_Proof# 1 - 07/12/2018 Marine Biodiversity https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-018-0933-2 1 3 ORIGINAL PAPER 2 4 5 On the larva and the zooid of the pterobranch Rhabdopleura recondita 6 Beli, Cameron and Piraino, 2018 (Hemichordata, Graptolithina) 7 F. Strano1,2 & V. Micaroni3 & E. Beli4,5 & S. Mercurio6 & G. Scarì7 & R. Pennati6 & S. Piraino4,8 8 9 Received: 31 October 2018 /Revised: 29 November 2018 /Accepted: 3 December 2018 10 # Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2018 11 Abstract 12 Hemichordates (Enteropneusta and Pterobranchia) belong to a small deuterostome invertebrate group that may offer insights on 13 the origin and evolution of the chordate nervous system. Among them, the colonial pterobranchOF Rhabdopleuridae are recognized 14 as living representatives of Graptolithina, a taxon with a rich fossil record. New information is provided here on the substrate 15 selection and the life cycle of Rhabdopleura recondita Beli, Cameron and Piraino, 2018, and for the first time, we describe the 16 nervous system organization of the larva and the adult zooid, as well as the morphological, neuroanatomical and behavioural 17 changes occurring throughout metamorphosis. Immunohistochemical analyses disclosed a centralized nervous system in the 18 sessile adult zooid, characterized by different neuronal subsets with three distinctPRO neurotransmitters, i.e. serotonin, dopamine and 19 RFamide. The peripheral nervous system comprises GABA-, serotonin-, and dopamine-immunoreactive cells. These observa- 20 tions support and integrate previous neuroanatomical findings on the pterobranchD zooid of Cephalodiscus gracilis. Indeed, this is 21 the first evidence of dopamine, RFamide and GABA neurotransmittersE in hemichordates pterobranchs. In contrast, the 22 lecithotrophic larva is characterized by a diffuse basiepidermal plexus of GABAergic cells, coupled with a small group of 23 serotonin-immunoreactive cells localized in the characteristic ventral depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Halogenation Enzymes in Bacteria Associated with the Red-Banded Acorn Worm, Ptychodera Jamaicensis" (2011)
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 2011 Halogenation Enzymes in Bacteria Associated with the Red- banded Acorn Worm, Ptychodera jamaicensis Milena May Lilles San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Lilles, Milena May, "Halogenation Enzymes in Bacteria Associated with the Red-banded Acorn Worm, Ptychodera jamaicensis" (2011). Master's Theses. 4099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.snbx-gv6x https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4099 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HALOGENATION ENZYMES IN BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH THE RED- BANDED ACORN WORM, PTYCHODERA JAMAICENSIS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Milena M. Lilles December 2011 © 2011 Milena M. Lilles ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled HALOGENATION ENZYMES IN BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH THE RED- BANDED ACORN WORM, PTYCHODERA JAMAICENSIS by Milena M. Lilles APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY December 2011 Dr. Sabine Rech Department of Biology Dr. Brandon White Department of Biology Dr. Roy Okuda Department of Chemistry ABSTRACT HALOGENATION ENZYMES IN BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH THE RED- BANDED ACORN WORM, PTYCHODERA JAMAICENSIS by Milena M. Lilles Organohalogens have diverse biological functions in the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Suspension-Feeding Tubicolous Hemichordates Karma Nanglu1* , Jean-Bernard Caron1,2, Simon Conway Morris3 and Christopher B
    Nanglu et al. BMC Biology (2016) 14:56 DOI 10.1186/s12915-016-0271-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Cambrian suspension-feeding tubicolous hemichordates Karma Nanglu1* , Jean-Bernard Caron1,2, Simon Conway Morris3 and Christopher B. Cameron4 Abstract Background: The combination of a meager fossil record of vermiform enteropneusts and their disparity with the tubicolous pterobranchs renders early hemichordate evolution conjectural. The middle Cambrian Oesia disjuncta from the Burgess Shale has been compared to annelids, tunicates and chaetognaths, but on the basis of abundant new material is now identified as a primitive hemichordate. Results: Notable features include a facultative tubicolous habit, a posterior grasping structure and an extensive pharynx. These characters, along with the spirally arranged openings in the associated organic tube (previously assigned to the green alga Margaretia), confirm Oesia as a tiered suspension feeder. Conclusions: Increasing predation pressure was probably one of the main causes of a transition to the infauna. In crown group enteropneusts this was accompanied by a loss of the tube and reduction in gill bars, with a corresponding shift to deposit feeding. The posterior grasping structure may represent an ancestral precursor to the pterobranch stolon, so facilitating their colonial lifestyle. The focus on suspension feeding as a primary mode of life amongst the basal hemichordates adds further evidence to the hypothesis that suspension feeding is the ancestral state for the major clade Deuterostomia. Keywords: Enteropneusta, Hemichordata, Cambrian, Burgess Shale Background no modern counterpart [11]. The coeval Oesia disjuncta Hemichordates are central to our understanding of Walcott [12] has been compared to groups as diverse as deuterostome evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Annelids David E
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2643 Development 139, 2643-2653 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074724 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: annelids David E. K. Ferrier* Summary whole to allow more robust comparisons with other phyla, as well Annelids (the segmented worms) have a long history in studies as for understanding the evolution of diversity. Much of annelid of animal developmental biology, particularly with regards to evolutionary developmental biology research, although by no their cleavage patterns during early development and their means all of it, has tended to concentrate on three particular taxa: neurobiology. With the relatively recent reorganisation of the the polychaete (see Glossary, Box 1) Platynereis dumerilii; the phylogeny of the animal kingdom, and the distinction of the polychaete Capitella teleta (previously known as Capitella sp.); super-phyla Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa, an extra stimulus and the oligochaete (see Glossary, Box 1) leeches, such as for studying this phylum has arisen. As one of the major phyla Helobdella. Even within this small selection of annelids, a good within Lophotrochozoa, Annelida are playing an important role range of the diversity in annelid biology is evident. Both in deducing the developmental biology of the last common polychaetes are marine, whereas Helobdella is a freshwater ancestor of the protostomes and deuterostomes, an animal from inhabitant. The polychaetes P. dumerilii and C. teleta are indirect which >98% of all described animal species evolved. developers (see Glossary, Box 1), with a larval stage followed by metamorphosis into the adult form, whereas Helobdella is a direct Key words: Annelida, Polychaetes, Segmentation, Regeneration, developer (see Glossary, Box 1), with the embryo developing into Central nervous system the worm form without passing through a swimming larval stage.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anatomical Description of a Miniaturized Acorn Worm (Hemichordata, Enteropneusta) with Asexual Reproduction by Paratomy
    An Anatomical Description of a Miniaturized Acorn Worm (Hemichordata, Enteropneusta) with Asexual Reproduction by Paratomy The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Worsaae, Katrine, Wolfgang Sterrer, Sabrina Kaul-Strehlow, Anders Hay-Schmidt, and Gonzalo Giribet. 2012. An anatomical description of a miniaturized acorn worm (hemichordata, enteropneusta) with asexual reproduction by paratomy. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48529. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048529 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11732117 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA An Anatomical Description of a Miniaturized Acorn Worm (Hemichordata, Enteropneusta) with Asexual Reproduction by Paratomy Katrine Worsaae1*, Wolfgang Sterrer2, Sabrina Kaul-Strehlow3, Anders Hay-Schmidt4, Gonzalo Giribet5 1 Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 Bermuda Natural History Museum, Flatts, Bermuda, 3 Department for Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 4 Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachussetts, United States of America Abstract The interstitial environment of marine sandy bottoms is a nutrient-rich, sheltered habitat whilst at the same time also often a turbulent, space-limited, and ecologically challenging environment dominated by meiofauna. The interstitial fauna is one of the most diverse on earth and accommodates miniaturized representatives from many macrofaunal groups as well as several exclusively meiofaunal phyla.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Diversity Notes
    Animal Diversity Notes Key Biology Concepts Protostomes/Deuterostomes Difference based on: type of embryo cleavage fate of blastopore ontogeny of coelom (schizocely vs enterocely) Tradeoffs of Ectothermy Disadvantages: o Activity limited by external temperature o Requires behavioural adaptations for finding thermal microenvironments (basking in sun or finding cool refuge) o Become inactive for part of the year o Limitations on latitudinal range (not as far north or south as endotherms) 1 Advantages: o High efficiency of converting ingested food to biomass o Can thrive in ecosystems of low productivity (deserts, hot and dry) o Can survive with low metabolic rate Purposes of Migration broadens the resource base, tracks available food high latitudes have longer days in summer, allowing extended foraging maintains relatively constant temperature by going tropics as winter sets in prevents permanent predation pressure in one location Advantages of the Coelomate Body Plan Cavity can function for circulation, waste disposal, and gamete storage and release Enables the development of a hydrostatic skeleton Provides cushioning for the digestive tract Muscular movements of the digestive tract isolated from the outer body wall and skeletal muscular movements Advantages of Metamerism Improved efficiency of motion using hydrostatic skeleton Independent nervous control and movement of segments Architectural redundancy allows specialisation of segments as well as survival/regeneration when segments are lost Modes of Development 2 3 Timeline of Evolution 4 Essential Diagrams Cladograms 5 6 7 8 9 10 Key Animal Diagrams 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Animal Phyla Porifera Calcarea: calcareous sponges, mostly small Hexactinellida: possess six-rayed siliceous spicules, have continuous syncytial tissue called trabecular reticulum Demospongiae: Over 80% of sponge species, all are leuconoid, can have siliceous spicules or spongin fibres Cnidaria Hydrozoa: generally have asexual polyp and sexual medusa stages (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • (1940) : - Proposed New Systematic
    Downloaded from https:// www.studiestoday.com ANIMAL DIVERSITY-I IN TRODUCTION : –Taxomony (Gr.) - study of nomenclature, classification and their principles. This word was given by ''Candolle'' (Taxis – arrangements. Nomos - Law) HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF TAXONOMY : –Aristotle : - ''father of zoology ''. (Book : Historia Animalium) Father of ancient animal – Classification. He classified animals into two groups on the basis of their natural similarities and differences into – (i) Anaima :- Those animals which don't have Red blood or in which RBC are absent e.g. Sponges, Cnidaria, Mollusca, Arthropoda. Echinodermata like Invertebrates. (ii) Enaima :- These animals have red blood. This group includes all vertebrated and it has been further divided into two sub groups. (a) Vivipara :- It incldues animals which give birth to young-ones e.g. Man, Whale and other mammals. (b) Ovipara : - It includes animals which lay eggs. e.g. Amphibians, Pisces, Aves, Reptiles etc. –Pliny :- He classified animal into groups : - (a) Flying (b) Non-flying –John-Ray :- He gave & defined the term '' species'' as the smallest unit of classfication. He gave ''concept of species ''. According to him, the organisms which develop from the similar type of parents, belong to the same-species. –Mayr : - According to him similar species are those which are capacble of interbreeding in natureal condtions. Modern definition of species is conied by ''Mayr''. –Binomial system of Nomenclature was devised by Gesparrd-Bauhin. But the detailed information about Binomial system was given by Linnaeus. In 1758 in the 10th edition of his book ''Systema Naturae'' he gave the classification of known 4236 animals and presented the Binomial system of nomenclature of animal.
    [Show full text]