Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 26 Issue 2 Symposium: The Changing Landscape of Article 10 Collegiate Athletics Hey, College Sports. Compromise on Compensation and You Can Have a Legal Monopoly Todd A. McFall Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Todd A. McFall, Hey, College Sports. Compromise on Compensation and You Can Have a Legal Monopoly, 26 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 459 (2016) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol26/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. MCFALL FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 6/14/2016 5:35 PM HEY, COLLEGE SPORTS. COMPROMISE ON COMPENSATION AND YOU CAN HAVE A LEGAL MONOPOLY TODD A. MCFALL* OVERVIEW The fate of the century-old National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has never been as tenuous as it is currently. Court disputes regarding the legality of the organization’s long-standing scholarship-as-compensation model are in full bloom, and the decisions in these disputes, which range from suits like O’Bannon v. NCAA, a dispute that could have a somewhat large impact on NCAA policies,1 to suits like Jenkins v. NCAA,2 which asks the courts to overturn completely the compensation structure offered to scholarship athletes,3 could call for huge changes to the way college sports operate.4 If the courts side with any one of the plaintiffs in these suits, the NCAA and its members will face difficult questions about how to operate in a world with completely shifted legal constraints.