F3 to Sydney Orbital Link Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

F3 to Sydney Orbital Link Study F 3 T O S Y D N E Y O R B I T A L L I N K S T U D Y s u m m a r y r e p o r t february 2004 Part A Summary Foreword Contents This is the summary report on a study to identify a preferred option for a new National Highway link through Introduction.....................................................................2 northern Sydney between the F3 Sydney to Newcastle The Current Situation .....................................................3 Freeway and the Sydney Orbital. Key Issues of Growth and Sustainability ........................5 The new link is intended to replace the existing interim National Highway, which runs along Pennant Hills Road. Rail Freight and Public Transport ...................................7 Pennant Hills Road suffers from traffic congestion and Need for a New Link and Its Objectives .........................8 high crash rates as well as causing severe amenity impacts for adjacent residents. The new link is intended Options Development and the Corridor Types .............10 to be constructed after the Westlink M7 opens. Transport Assessment of Corridor Types A, B and C...12 Consultants Sinclair Knight Merz were commissioned in Social Effects Assessment of Corridor Types A, B early 2002 to carry out the study for the Australian and C ......................................................................14 Government. The NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) managed the study. The study team reported to a Environmental Assessment of Corridor Types A, B Steering Committee of the Department of Transport and and C ......................................................................15 Regional Services (DOTARS), the RTA and the NSW Department of Transport, now Department of Economic Assessment of Corridor Types A, B and C ..17 Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources (DIPNR). The Type A Options .....................................................18 The study includes a range of assumptions about the Transport Assessment of Type A Options....................20 development of the transport system of Sydney. While most of these assumptions were drawn from public Social and Environmental Assessment of Type A documents at the time of analysis they are not Options ...................................................................21 necessarily current proposals or policy views of the NSW Capital Cost Estimates and Economic Assessment of or Australian Governments. Type A Options.......................................................22 The study was strategic in nature and examined broad Community Consultation ..............................................23 corridors and options for a new link. These were assessed for their feasibility in terms of: The Recommended Purple Option ...............................25 • Traffic and Transport – safety and network capacity, Recommendations and Way Forward ..........................27 focusing on freight, commercial and inter-regional travel; • Social effects – amenity, severance and property ; • Economic effects – project and community costs and benefits, including the effects of tolls; and • Environmental impacts – air quality, flora and fauna, noise and heritage. A comprehensive community and stakeholder involvement program was an integral part of the study. The views of the community have played an important part in formulating the study’s recommendations. The study has found that rail is unlikely to meet the future inter-regional transport task even if major rail infrastructure upgrades occur. The study also found that the Type A Purple option linking the F3 with the M2 Motorway best meets National Highway objectives and is justified on social, economic and inter-regional transport grounds. The study recommends that the Purple option be the preferred option for the new National Highway link. The next step should be the development of a concept proposal based on the Purple option. This should be the subject of further consultation with the community and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 1 Introduction This study builds on the work and findings of previous studies which have investigated improvements to the main northern transport corridor. Background and Purpose of the Study One of those opportunities is the Westlink M7 (previously known as the Western Sydney Orbital). This feasibility study was funded by the Federal Construction of Westlink M7 has commenced and is Department of Transport and Regional Services anticipated to be completed in 2006. The Westlink M7 (DOTARS) and managed by the New South Wales and part of the M2 Motorway will collectively form part of Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA). Sinclair Knight Merz the Sydney Orbital and replace the Cumberland was commissioned to undertake the study. The study Highway, as the National Highway through Sydney. area is shown in Figure 1. The completion of the Westlink M7 will leave the The purpose of the study was to identify a new high remaining section of Pennant Hills Road between the standard transport link between the F3 and the Sydney Sydney Orbital and the F3 as the only section of the Orbital and replace Pennant Hills Road as the interim National Highway through Sydney that is not motorway National Highway. The study timeframe is 20 years. standard. Prior to 1994 there was no designated National Highway route through Sydney. The National Highway terminated Approach to the Study at Hornsby in the north and at Crossroads (near Liverpool) in the south. In 1994, the Cumberland The stages and the key steps in undertaking the study Highway was declared part of the National Highway are shown in Figure 2. system. Since then the Australian Government has provided funding for significant upgrading of this link, and has been exploring opportunities to develop an alternative National Highway through Sydney which is of motorway standard. Figure 1: The Study Area Figure 2: The Study Process 2 The Current Situation The large and increasing volumes of traffic including heavy trucks travelling day and night along the interim National Highway have caused a significant loss of urban amenity along Pennant Hills Road. Of the 8,800 trucks using Pennant Hills Road each week-day, about half are six, eight or nine axle articulated trucks carrying 40 gross tonnes or more. Travelling Conditions Traffic along the F3 corridor has been increasing at an average rate of about 3% per year over the last ten Pennant Hills Road years. Average annual daily traffic (AADT) at the The existing interim National Highway route through Hawkesbury River Bridge was 71,200 vehicles per day Sydney runs partly along Pennant Hills Road. North of in 2002. During some holiday periods traffic flows are the M2 Motorway, Pennant Hills Road operates as a much higher than the average daily flows and severe major arterial road in Sydney’s transport network congestion can occur. carrying up to 75,600 vehicles per day (see Figure 3). Inter-regional and long-distance through-traffic volumes make up about 23% of total daily traffic. Pennant Hills Freight and Public Transport Road is generally six traffic lanes wide. There are 22 Rail Freight sets of traffic signals over the 9 kilometre section from the M2 Motorway to the F3 interchange at Wahroonga. The current rail share of the contestable freight market on the Main North Line is 5 million net tonnes per year or Average peak travel speeds on Pennant Hills Road are about 14% of total freight moved (by net tonnes) in the often below 25 km/h at Pennant Hills and can be as low corridor. as 14 km/h. The road is congested during commuter peak periods and business hours which results in About 50% of rail freight traffic on the Main North line unreliable travel times and can lead to major disruptions can be classified as through Sydney traffic, that is traffic to inter-regional traffic movements. on trains without an origin or destination in Sydney. Pennant Hills Road and the Pacific Highway are Rail’s traffic growth is restricted by the curfew on rail expected to experience continuing traffic growth. Since freight movements on the Sydney network during movements are at capacity during most peak periods, commuter peak periods and other capacity and service traffic volumes will grow outside the current peak periods reliability limitations on the Main North and North Coast and into business hours. lines. F3 Freeway Pennant Hills Road joins the F3 Freeway at Wahroonga. F3 is the National Highway route linking the Hunter region and the Central Coast to Sydney. Traffic to/from the Central Coast makes up about 60% of the total daily traffic on the F3. Long distance traffic including heavy vehicle traffic with origins and destinations north of the Central Coast make up about 40% of the daily traffic volumes. 71,200 F3 11,300 75,600 Pacific Hwy 8,800 63,500 4,000 Boundary Rd Wahroonga Pennant Hills Rd Beecroft Rd 69,000 8,000 Ryde Rd M2 77,400 4,900 Rail services are constrained on the Main North Rail Line 2002 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 2002 Average Weekday Truck Volumes (AWT) Figure 3: Existing Traffic Volumes on Major Arterials on the Northern Sydney Road Network 3 Road Transport Pedestrians and Cyclists Supporting freight and commerce is a key objective of The road and public transport infrastructure system must the National Highway network. The F3 carries an cater for the requirements of cyclists and pedestrians. average of 11,300 trucks each weekday at the They are small groups compared with the majority of Hawkesbury River bridge, including more than 5,500 travellers, however, they represent important
Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Approval
    Infrastructure approval Section 115ZB of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 I grant approval to the State significant infrastructure application referred to in schedule 1, subject to the conditions in schedules 2. These conditions are required to: • prevent, minimise, and/or offset adverse environmental impacts including economic and social impacts; • set standards and performance measures for acceptable environmental performance; • require regular monitoring and reporting; and • provide for the ongoing environmental management of the SSI. The Hon Pru Goward MP Minister for Planning Sydney 2015 SCHEDULE 1 Application no.: SSI-6136 Proponent: Roads and Maritime Services Approval Authority: Minister for Planning Land: Land in the suburbs of Hornsby, North Wahroonga, Wahroonga, Normanhurst, Thornleigh, Pennant Hills, Beecroft, West Pennant Hills, Carlingford, North Rocks, Northmead and Baulkham Hills State Significant Infrastructure: Development for the purposes of the NorthConnex project being a new multi-lane road link between the M1 Pacific Motorway (formerly the F3 Sydney–Newcastle Expressway) at North Wahroonga and the Hills M2 Motorway at Baulkham Hills, including: ▪ construction and operation of two road tunnels for traffic traveling north - south between the M1 Pacific Motorway and the Hills M2 Motorway; ▪ M2 integration works; ▪ construction of access points and improvements to intersections and interchanges in the vicinity of NorthConnex; ▪ construction of ventilation facilities; ▪ motorway control centre; and ▪ 11
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Camera Locations
    April 2014 Current Speed Camera Locations Fixed Speed Camera Locations Suburb/Town Road Comment Alstonville Bruxner Highway, between Gap Road and Teven Road Major road works undertaken at site Camera Removed (Alstonville Bypass) Angledale Princes Highway, between Hergenhans Lane and Stony Creek Road safety works proposed. See Camera Removed RMS website for details. Auburn Parramatta Road, between Harbord Street and Duck Street Banora Point Pacific Highway, between Laura Street and Darlington Drive Major road works undertaken at site Camera Removed (Pacific Highway Upgrade) Bar Point F3 Freeway, between Jolls Bridge and Mt White Exit Ramp Bardwell Park / Arncliffe M5 Tunnel, between Bexley Road and Marsh Street Ben Lomond New England Highway, between Ross Road and Ben Lomond Road Berkshire Park Richmond Road, between Llandilo Road and Sanctuary Drive Berry Princes Highway, between Kangaroo Valley Road and Victoria Street Bexley North Bexley Road, between Kingsland Road North and Miller Avenue Blandford New England Highway, between Hayles Street and Mills Street Bomaderry Bolong Road, between Beinda Street and Coomea Street Bonnyrigg Elizabeth Drive, between Brown Road and Humphries Road Bonville Pacific Highway, between Bonville Creek and Bonville Station Road Brogo Princes Highway, between Pioneer Close and Brogo River Broughton Princes Highway, between Austral Park Road and Gembrook Road safety works proposed. See Auditor-General Deactivated Lane RMS website for details. Bulli Princes Highway, between Grevillea Park Road and Black Diamond Place Bundagen Pacific Highway, between Pine Creek and Perrys Road Major road works undertaken at site Camera Removed (Pacific Highway Upgrade) Burringbar Tweed Valley Way, between Blakeneys Road and Cooradilla Road Burwood Hume Highway, between Willee Street and Emu Street Road safety works proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARTER HALL LONG WALE REIT Annexure A: SUEZ Portfolio Overview December 2016 Charter Hall | 2016 Property Overview
    October 2015 CHARTER HALL LONG WALE REIT Annexure A: SUEZ portfolio overview December 2016 Charter Hall | 2016 Property overview 12 Lanceley Place, Artarmon, NSW The property comprises a purpose built waste transfer station, with the main building built over two levels. Located in a tightly-held industrial precinct in Artarmon, the property benefits from easy access to the Pacific Highway and Gorehill Freeway. The property is situated in a cul-de-sac among well established industrial properties, approximately 7kms north of the Sydney CBD and 3kms north of North Sydney. Property details Ownership interest 100% Purchase price $17.3 million WALE 30.0 years Occupancy 100% GLA 4,309 sqm Site area 8,726 sqm 20 Davis Road, Wetherill Park, NSW The property comprises a purpose built waste transfer station and weighbridge. The property is surrounded by traditional industrial developments of low to high clearance warehouses and other operations. Wetherill Park is located approximately 30kms west of the Sydney CBD and enjoys excellent access to major Sydney arterial road networks including the Prospect Highway, Cumberland Highway, the M4, M5 and M7 Motorways. Property details Ownership interest 100% Purchase price $10.1 million WALE 10.0 years Occupancy 100% GLA 3,975 sqm Site area 20,490 sqm 2 Charter Hall | 2016 Property overview 201 Newton Road, Wetherill Park, NSW The property comprises an office component over two levels adjoining warehouse amenity. The property is situated on the northern side of Newton Road between Coates Place and Hexham Place. Wetherill Park is located approximately 30kms west of the Sydney CBD and enjoys excellent access to major Sydney arterial road networks including the Prospect Highway, Cumberland Highway, the M4, M5 and M7 Motorways.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney Period of Coverage To: 31 May 2016
    Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney Period of coverage to: 31 May 2016 Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd ABN 66 008 709 608 www.downergroup.com Page 1 of 21 Contents General Information 3 Information Line: 1300 776 069 3 Warnings: 3 Round-up Bioactive Herbicide 3 Lynx WG 3 Forward Program 4 MSDS 11 Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd ABN 66 008 709 608 www.downergroup.com Page 2 of 21 General Information Pesticide use is used for weed and vegetation control. The pesticides used is a standard mixture of Lynx WG Round-up Bioactive Herbicide All pesticide spraying is programmed between: Sunday to Thursday 8pm – 5am Works will be rescheduled if rain is forecasted within 24hours or the wind speed is above 15kmph. Information Line: 1300 776 069 Warnings: Round-up Bioactive Herbicide Do not contaminate dams, rivers or streams with the product or used container. When controlling weeds in aquatic situations refer to label directions to minimise the entry of spray into the water. Lynx WG DO NOT use chlorine bleach with ammonia. All traces of liquid fertilizer containing ammonia, ammonium nitrate or ammonium sulphate must be rinsed with water from the mixing and application equipment before adding chlorine bleach solution. Failure to do so will release a gas with a musty chlorine odour which can cause eye, nose, throat and lung irritation. Do not clean equipment in an enclosed area. DO NOT contaminate streams, rivers or waterways with the chemical or used containers. A nil withholding period is applicable for LYNX WG Herbicide. It is recommended, however, not to graze treated areas for 3 days to ensure product efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney – Period of Coverage Between July 2016 and June 2017
    Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney – Period of coverage between July 2016 and June 2017 Contents 1 General Information 3 For further information, call the information line: 1300 776 069 3 1.1.1 Summary of Warnings 3 Downer EDI Limited ABN 97 003 872 848 www.downergroup.com Page 2 of 3 1 General Information Pesticides are used for weed and vegetation control across north east Sydney. The pesticides used include: Lynx WG; and Round-up Bioactive Herbicide. All pesticide spraying is programmed between the following days and times: Sunday to Thursday between 8pm and 5am. Works will be rescheduled if: Rain is forecast within 24 hours of the proposed weed control activities; and Wind speed is likely to be above 15 km/per hour during proposed weed control activities. For further information, call the information line: 1300 776 069 1.1.1 Summary of Warnings Round-up Bioactive Herbicide Do not contaminate dams, rivers or streams with the product or used containers. When controlling weeds in aquatic environments, refer to product label directions to minimise the impact of spray on aquatic environment. Lynx WG Do not use chlorine bleach with ammonia. The mixing and application equipment must be cleaned of all traces of liquid fertiliser containing ammonia, ammonium nitrate or ammonium sulphate prior to adding chlorine bleach. Failure to do so will release a gas with a musty chlorine odour which can cause eye, nose, throat and lung irritation. Do not clean equipment in an enclosed area. Do not contaminate streams, rivers or waterways with the chemical or used containers.
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Smart Motorway Prospect Highway Eastbound on Ramp
    M4 Smart Motorway Prospect Highway eastbound on ramp Transport for NSW | February 2020 The NSW Government is investing $600 million Ramp closures to build the M4 Smart Motorway. The first of its kind in NSW, this project will introduce intelligent Transport for NSW will continue work at the technology to the M4 Motorway between Pitt Prospect Highway eastbound on ramp at Street, Mays Hill and Mulgoa Road, Penrith. Prospect. When complete, the M4 Smart Motorway is The eastbound on ramp will be closed for two expected to reduce average travel times, provide nights on Sunday 23 February and Monday 24 more reliable journeys and reduce crashes by up February from 9pm to 4am, each night to to 30 per cent. complete drainage and landscaping work. Sections of the M4 Smart Motorway will begin to return to the original speed limit over the next few months. Where construction continues, temporary speed limits will remain in place. Please take note of the signage and drive within the speed limit. From 1 December 2019, Roads and Maritime Services and Transport for NSW joined together to form one organisation – Transport for NSW. The Transport cluster is evolving so we can deliver more integrated transport services and better outcomes for customers and communities across NSW. Our work schedule Contact us We will be on site for two nights on Sunday If you have any questions about the M4 23 February and Monday 24 February from Smart Motorway project, please contact our 9pm to 4am each night, weather permitting. delivery partner Seymour Whyte on: Day work at the site will continue between 1800 989 929 7am and 6pm from Monday to Friday and [email protected] 8am and 1pm Saturdays.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentof New South Wales Legislativeassembly 1993 Third
    PARLIAMENT OF NEW SOUTH WALES LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 1993 THIRD SESSION OF THE FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT ___________________ QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS No. 34 TUESDAY 19 OCTOBER 1993 ___________________ [The Questions and Answers Paper published for the first sitting day in each week will contain, by number and title, all unanswered questions, together with questions to which answers have been received on the previous sitting and any new questions. On subsequent days, new questions are printed, as are questions to which answers were received the previous day. Consequently the full text of any question will be printed only twice: when notice is given; and, when answered.] [Pursuant to the Sessional Order adopted by the House on 24 February 1993, Members shall be permitted to lodge 3 questions on notice per sitting day accumulative over one sitting week, provided that the Leader of the Opposition shall be permitted to lodge 4 questions on notice per sitting day. Ministers shall lodge answers to questions on notice within 15 sitting days after the question is first published and such answer shall be published forthwith.] Page 2098 DATE OF PUBLICATION OF QUESTION ANSWER TO BE LODGED BY Q. & A. No. 19 19 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1225 to 1261) Q. & A. No. 20 20 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1262 to 1328) Q. & A. No. 21 21 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1329 to 1345) Q. & A. No. 22 26 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1346 to 1387) Q. & A. No. 23 27 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1388 to 1463) Q. & A. No. 24 28 October 1993 (Including Question Nos 1464 to 1524) Q.
    [Show full text]
  • ENG4111 Preliminary Report
    University of Southern Queensland Faculty of Engineering and Surveying Own Identification of contributing factors for the success of toll roads in Australia under Public Private Partnerships A Dissertation submitted by Mr Luke Diffin In fulfilment of the requirements of Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) October 2015 ABSTRACT In Australia, Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) have been established as a common method for governments to deliver major road infrastructure projects. Success of PPPs has varied when measured against Government, Community, Market and Industry interests. Some projects have failed financially while still having a positive impact on the community. Other projects have failed to reach delivery stage as a result of community objections. The holistic success of PPP toll roads is ultimately determined by the needs of major project participants being satisfied in an unbiased equilibrium manner. PPP toll roads delivered in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne have had varying degrees of financial success, however there are other vitally important factors to be considered. Tollways directly contribute to travel time savings, vehicle operating cost savings, reduced accidents and vehicle emissions and can make a contribution to the overall economic performance of a city. Therefore these pieces of infrastructure contribute to society as a whole and not just the investors who provide capital for the projects. Even with recent financial failings of PPP toll roads, Governments within Australia are still actively pursuing the PPP model to deliver road infrastructure. Lessons must be learnt from past failures to ensure the successful delivery and operation of future projects. Overall success will be a result of finding a balance between the needs of Government, Private Sector and Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 – Strategic Context and Project Need
    Chapter 4 – Strategic context and project need 4 Strategic context and project need 4.1 Current issues with the road network 4.1.1 Traffic congestion across Greater Sydney Traffic growth is forecast across NSW and will include around one million extra road users in Sydney within the next decade and nearly twice the freight movements by 2031. Congestion across metropolitan Sydney is estimated to cost up to $6.1 billion per annum, rising to $12.6 billion by 2030 if nothing is done1. Travel by road is the dominant transport mode in Sydney. Even with high growth in rail freight and public transport, road travel is predicted to continue to be the most dominant travel choice for at least the next 20 years2. Traffic congestion impacts communities and businesses by: • Affecting Sydney’s large and significant freight, service and business operations • Reducing the reliability of, and accessibility to, public transport • Constraining the movement of pedestrians and cyclists • Reducing amenity for nearby residents, pedestrians, cyclists and sensitive land uses (educational and health facilities). 4.1.2 Missing regional motorway link In Sydney’s South District (which includes the Canterbury-Bankstown, Georges River and Sutherland LGAs), over 50 per cent of journeys are undertaken by car. There is currently no motorway between the existing M1 Princes Motorway south of Waterfall and the Sydney motorway network. All local and through traffic, including heavy vehicle traffic, is currently required to use the arterial road network to travel between Waterfall and Sydney, principally the A1 Princes Highway, the A3 King Georges Road and / or the A6 Heathcote Road / New Illawarra Road.
    [Show full text]
  • (2007) Collaroy-Narrabeen Coastal Imaging System Report 3, Analysis
    COLLAROY-NARRABEEN COASTAL IMAGING SYSTEM REPORT 3 ANALYSIS OF SHORELINE VARIABILITYAND EROSION/ACCRETION TRENDS: JULY 2006 - JUNE 2007 by M J Blacka, D J Anderson and I L Turner Technical Report 2007/30 August 2007 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY COLLAROY-NARRABEEN COASTAL IMAGING SYSTEM REPORT 3 ANALYSIS OF SHORELINE VARIABILITY AND EROSION/ACCRETION TRENDS: JULY 2006 – JUNE 2007 WRL Technical Report 2007/30 August 2007 by M J Blacka, D J Anderson and I L Turner Water Research Laboratory School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technical Report No 2007/30 University of New South Wales ABN 57 195 873 179 Report Status Final King Street Date of Issue August 2007 Manly Vale NSW 2093 Australia Telephone: +61 (2) 9949 4488 WRL Project No. 02092.03 Facsimile: +61 (2) 9949 4188 Project Manager Doug Anderson Title Collaroy-Narrabeen Coastal Imaging System - Report 3: Analysis of Shoreline Variability and Erosion/Accretion Trends: July 2006 – June 2007 Author(s) Matthew J Blacka, Doug J Anderson and Ian L Turner Client Name Warringah Council Client Address Civic Centre, 725 Pittwater Road, Dee Why NSW 2099 Client Contact Daylan Cameron – Catchment Management Team Client Reference The work reported herein was carried out by the Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, acting on behalf of the client. Information published in this report is available for general release only by permission of the Director, Water Research Laboratory, and the client. WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2007/30 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Maintenance, Upgrades and Operational Issues 1-2 1.3 Report Outline 1-2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney IBX Data Center NSW 2020 Australia [email protected]
    IBX TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Unit B, 639 Gardeners Road 1.800.172.417 (Australia) SY1 Mascot, Sydney +61.2.8337.2000 (International) Sydney IBX Data Center NSW 2020 Australia [email protected] EQUINIX SYDNEY DATA CENTERS Equinix helps companies accelerate business performance Parramatta A40 M2 by connecting them to their customers and partners inside the SY6 world’s most networked data centers. Our Sydney International A8 Business Exchange™ (IBX®) data centers consist of seven facilities M4 networked across two campuses to give customers flexibility and A40 redundancy options, with the eighth data center, SY5, targeted to M1 Lidcombe open in the second half of 2019. Our data centers are business A4 Sydney hubs for 730+ companies. Customers can choose from a broad A6 range of network services from 155+ network service providers A22 Surry Hills and interconnect directly to customers and partners in their digital A3 Newtown SY3 supply chain. Marrickville SY1/2 SY8 Our Sydney data centers are where companies can gain direct access to both submarine cable landing station and PoP. Equinix’s SY4 SY5 M5 Mascot M1 Internet Exchange is also the largest network peering platform in M1 A36 the Australian market and our facilities have the largest collection of international and regional networks in Australia. Wollongong SY7 B65 SYDNEY IBX® BENEFITS • Most interconnected data center campus in Australia M1 B65 • Access to 265+ cloud providers (includes direct connection to Berkeley Port Kembla A1 AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Compute and Oracle
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Synthesis 9 – Effects of Aircraft Noise
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM SYNTHESIS 9 Effects of Aircraft Noise: Research Update on Selected Topics A Synthesis of Airport Practice ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2008 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS JAMES WILDING Chair: Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas DOT, Topeka Independent Consultant Vice Chair: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley VICE CHAIR Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board JEFF HAMIEL MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. BARRY BARKER, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY ALLEN D. BIEHLER, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS JOHN D. BOWE, President, Americas Region, APL Limited, Oakland, CA LARRY L. BROWN, SR., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson JAMES CRITES DEBORAH H. BUTLER, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Dallas–Ft. Worth International Airport Corporation, Norfolk, VA RICHARD DE NEUFVILLE WILLIAM A.V. CLARK, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology DAVID S. EKERN, Commissioner, Virginia DOT, Richmond KEVIN C. DOLLIOLE NICHOLAS J. GARBER, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, UCG Associates University of Virginia, Charlottesville JOHN K. DUVAL JEFFREY W. HAMIEL, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Beverly Municipal Airport EDWARD A. (NED) HELME, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC STEVE GROSSMAN WILL KEMPTON, Director, California DOT, Sacramento Oakland International Airport SUSAN MARTINOVICH, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City TOM JENSEN MICHAEL D. MEYER, Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia National Safe Skies Alliance Institute of Technology, Atlanta CATHERINE M. LANG MICHAEL R. MORRIS, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Federal Aviation Administration Arlington GINA MARIE LINDSEY NEIL J.
    [Show full text]