DOCSLIB.ORG

2015-10-22, TEP To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015-10-22, TEP To EXHIBIT #2 (CORRESPONDENCE) Clay Smith, P.E. Tioga Energy Partners, LLC Box 22222 Albany, NY 12201 Re: Snyder Wells E1 and E1-A Drill Cuttings and Flowback Waste October 1, 2015 Mr. Smith: Thank you for your inquiry regarding disposal of flow back and production water. Our McKean County Landfill, in Mount Jewitt, PA., can solidify liquid waste, such as these, prior to disposal in the landfill. The McKean County Landfill operates under PADEP permit #100361 which authorizes acceptance and solidification of this type of waste. The waste material must be characterized and approved prior to acceptance at the site. If you have any questions or require anything further, please contact me. We look forward to working with your company. Sincerely, Larry Shilling, VP LF Marketing and Business Development Casella Waste Systems of New York, Inc., Western Region Office, 798 Cascadilla Street, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 (607)277-4820 EXHIBIT#3 (GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONS) GENERAC® Standby Standby Generators Generators Liquid-Cooled Gas Engine INCLUDES: Standby Power Rating Model QT070 (Aluminum - Bisque) - 70 kW 60 Hz • Two Line LCD Tri-Lingual Digital Nexus TM Model QTOBO (Aluminum - Bisque) - 80 kW 60 Hz Controller Model QTfOO (Aluminum - Bisque) - 100 kW 60 Hz • Isochronous Electronic Governor Model QT130 (Aluminum - Bisque) - 130 kW 60 Hz Model OT150 (Aluminum - Bisque) - 150 kW 60 Hz • Sound Attenuated Enclosure · • Closed Coolant Recovery System • Smart Battery Charger • UV/Ozone Resistant Hoses • ±1% Voltage Regulation • Natural Gas or LP Operation • 2 Year Limited Warranty • UL 2200 Listed QUIEF TEST c@usLISlED fU§AJ. Meets EPA Emission Regulations 70, 100, 130 & 150 ~meet CNMA emissions requirement Witn optional catalyst BO kW not for sate in CNMA FEATURES O INNOVATIVE DESIGN & PROTOTYPE TESTING are key componenls of 0 SOLID·STATE; FREQUENCY COMPENSATED VOLTAGE REGULATION. GENERAC'S success in "IMPROVING POWER BY DESIGN." But it This slate·ol-the-art power maximizing regulation system is stao:!ard on doesn't stop there. Total commitment to component testing, reliability all Generac models, It provides optimized FAST RESPONSE to changing testing, environinental testing, destruction and life testing, plus testing load conditions and MAXIMUM MOTOR STARTING CAPABILITY by to applicable CSA, NEMA, EGSA, and other standards, allows you to electronically torque-matching tne surge loads to the engine. Digital rooose GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS with the confidence that these vc:iltage regulation at ±1%. systems wrn provide superior performance. o SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE RESPONSE from Generac's extensive dealer network provides parts and service know·how for the entire unit, from the 0 TEST CRITERIA: engine to the smallest electronic component. .,- PROTOTYPE TESTED .;: NEMA MG1·22 EVALUATION o GENERAC TRANSFER SWITCHES. Long life and reliability are .,. SYSTEM TORSIONAL TESTED .,. MOTOR STARTING ABILITY synonymous wilh GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS. Dhe reason for this confidence is that the GENERAC product line includes its own transfer systems and controls for total system·compatibility. GENERAc·· GENERAC" 70 • 80 • 100 • 130 • 150 kW application &engineering data GENERAToR SPECIFICATIONS ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS; 80 kW Type Synchronous Make Generac Rotor lnsulatlon Class H Model V.."fype Stator Insulation Class H Cylinqers B Telephone lnler1erence Factor {TIF) <50 Displacement (liters) 4.6 Alternator Output Leads 1·Phase 4wire Bore (i!Vmm) 3,55190.2 6wire (70, BO & 150 kW) or Stroke (io/mm) 3.54/8Jj.9 Allernator Output Leads 3-Phase 12 wire (100 & 130 kW) Compression Ralio 9.4:1 Bearings Sealed Ball Intake Air System Naturally Aspira!ecl Flexible Disc (70, & 150 WI) Coupling ao Liller Type Hydraulic or Gear Drive (100 & 130 kW) Excitation System Brushless ENGINE SPECIFlC:ATIONS: 70, 100, i 30 & 150 kW Make Generac VOLTAGE REGULATION Model V-Type Type Electronic Cylinders 10 Sensing Single Phase Displacement (Liters) 6.8 Regula lion ±1% Bore (lntmm) 3.55/90.2 GOVERNOR SPECIFICATIONS Stroke (io/mm) 4.17/105.9 Type Eleclronic Compression Ratio 9:1 Frequency.Regulation Isochronous Intake Air System Naturally Asplra!ecl Steady Slate Regulation ±025% lifter Type Hydraulic ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINE LUBRlCATJON SYSTEM Balteiy Charge .Alternator 12 Volt 30 Amp Oil Pump Type Gear Static Balteiy Charger .2Amp Oil Filter Type Full flow spin-on cartridge Group 24F, 525 5/4.7 (70, 100, 130 & 150 kW) CCA Crankcase Capacity (quarls/liters) (70, ao & 1so kWJ or 6/5.7 (80 liW) Recommended Balteiy or Group 27F, 700. CCA (100 &130 kW) ENGINE COOLING SYSTEM Type System Voltage 12 Volts Closed Waler Pump Belt driven GENERATOR FEATURES 2300. 70 kW Revolving field heavy duty generator 1600. 80 kW Directly i:onnecled to the engine Fan Speed (rpm) 1670 • 100 kW Operating temperature rise 120 •c above a40 •c ambient Class HInsulation is raled al 150 •c rise at 25 •c ambient 1950-130 kW All models fully prototyped tested 2200. -150 kW 221558.8 (70 kW) or Fan Diameter (in/mm) ENCLOSURE FEATURES 261660.4 (80, 100, 130 &150 kW) ~nsures protecllon against mother nature. Aluminum wealher Pusher (70 kW) or Eleclrostatically applied texfured epoxy paint !or added Fan Made protective enclosure Puller (~O. 100, 130 & 150 kW) durablllty. Enclosed critical grade Quiet, critical grade muf!ler is mounted inside the unit FUEL SYSTEM mulller to prevent injuries. FuelType Natural gas, propane vapor Small, compact, altraclive Makes for an easy, eye appealing inslal!atioh. Carburetor Down Draft SAE Sound allenuated enclosure ensures quiet operation. Secondary Fuel Regulator Standard Fuel Shut Off Solenoid Standard Operating Fuel Pressure 11· • 14" H20 (All ratings in accordance witll BS5514, 1503046, IS08528, SAE J1349 and DIN6271) 70 • 80 • 100 • 130 • 150 kW operating data GENERATOR OUTPUT VOLTAGE/kW • 60Hz kW LPG Amp LPG kW Nat. Gas Amp Nat.Gas CB Size (Both) 120/240 V, 10, 1.0 pf 67 292 64 267 300 120/208 V, 30, O.B pf 70 243 67 232 300 OT070. 120/240 V, 30, 0.8 pf 70 211 67 201 250 277/480 V, 30, 0.8 pr 70 105 67 101 125 120/240 V, 10, 1.0 pf 77 333 77 333 .400 1201200 v. s0, o.8 pr 80 278 80 278 300 OTO BO 120/240 v. 30, 0.11 pf 80 241 80 240 300 277/480 V, 30, 0.8 pf 80 120 80 120 150 120/240v.10,1.0 pf 100 417 89 371 500 anoo 120/208 v. 30, 0.8 pf 100 347 94 326 400 120/240 v. 30, 0.8 pf 100 301 94 2ll3 350 277/480 v. 30, 0.8 pf 100 150 94 141 175 120/240 v. 10, 1.0 pf 130 542 117 488 600 120/208 v. 30, 0.8 pf 130 451 122 423 500 QT130 120/240 V, 30, 0.8 pf 130 391 122 .357 450 277/480 V, 30, 0.8 pf 130 195 122 183 225 120/240 V, 10, 1.0 pl 144 625 136 567 700 120/208 v. 30, 0.8 pl 150 520 142 493 600 OT150 120/240 V, 30, 0.8 pf 150 451 142 427 500 277/480 v. 30, 0.8 pf 150 225 142 214 250 SURGE CAPACITY IN AMPS ENGINE FlJEL CONSUMPTION Voltage Dfp @ < .4 pf Natural Gas Pmpane 15% 30% (IP/hr) (m3/hr) (gatllu) (J/hr) 120/240 V, 10 129 356 ExerniSe cycle 110 3.1 1.2 4.6 120/208 V, 30 194 471 7.4 10.8 QT070 25% of rated load 260 2.85 120/240 V, 30 168 408 QT070 50% of rated load 500 14.2 5.46 20.8 277/480 v. 30 83 201 75% of rated load 696 19.8 7.62 29.1 120/240V, 10 174 435 i 00% of rated load 1020 29 11;17 42.6 120/208 v. 30 186 466 Exercise cycle 131 3.7 1'45 5.5 01080 120/240 v. 30 161 404 25% of rated load 312 8,9 3.45 13.1 277/480 v, 30 70 175 OTOSO 50% ol rafed load 600 17.1 6.64 25 120/240 V, 10 150 413 75% of rated load 835 23.7 9.25 34.9 120/208 v. 30 186 452 100% orrated load 1154 32.8 12.78 48.2 01100 120/240 V, 30 161 392 Exercise cycle 130 3.7 1.4 5.4 277/480 V, 30 107 261 25% oi rafed load 371 10.5 4.1 15,5 120/240 V, 10 236 648 01100 50% of rated load 713 20.3 7.9 29.8 omo 120/208 V, 30 364 885 75% of rated load 991 28.2 11 41.5 120/240 v, 30 315 767 100% or rated load 1260 35.B 13.9 52.6 2771480 v. 30 161 390 Exercise cycle 135 3.8 1.4 5.7 120/240 V, 10 486 1214 25% of rated load 48.2 13.7 5.3 20 120/208 v. 30 534 1334 QT130 50% of rated load 26.3 10.3 38.7 QT150 m 120/240 V, 30 463 1156 75% or rated load 1292 36.7 14.3 54 2771480 V, 30 250 624 100% of rated load 1786 50.8 19.B 74.6 Exercise cycle 155 4.4 1.7 6.5 25% of rated load 556 15.8 6.09 23.2 QT150 50% of rated load 1070 30.4 11.72 44.7 Note: Fuel pipe must be sized for full load, 75% of rated load 1491 42.4 16.33 62.3 For Btu content mulliply fl3Jhr x2520 (LP) or ft3Jhr x1000 (NG). 100% of rated load 2061 58.6 22.57 86.1 For megajoule contenL multiple m3/hr x 93.89 {LP) or m3Jhr x 37 ~26 (NG).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8459 ! " # $ %&& &'&& ( ( ( ) * + , * - * %&& * ) . /!0* ! * 12%* 34 * * 5. 24 62633$64&2%6&* + /!0 , ( 7 /.+0 , ( , ! 7 * ( ( / ! " 0 / 0 ,6 ! ( ( 8! 55 /#$%&0 , 4 %1* ) , ,6 ' - * 9 : ( , ( (( ! * ( ( ( * .7 ( , ! ( ( 11 ( ; * .+ ! 7 ( ( /** ( 0 , ( * . ( ( ( ( ( , ( * " ( .+ ( # ! * ! 6 ( ( ( ( ( ( "6< ! , ( ( % * ( ( , (( * = , .+ * )* + ! ! 5+. +. 8)% 7 )! "6< ,-.' , ' / ' 0 ( 1 ' ' ,234&5 ' * > - %&& 5.. ;36;%$ 5. 24 62633$64&2%6& ' ''' 6 $32 / '99 *-*9 ? @ ' ''' 6 $320 List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic study of Arnica (Asteraceae): Low chloroplast DNA variation and problematic subgeneric classification. Sys- tematic Botany
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3
    PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3 Scientists proudly state their profession! In This Issue.............. Botany 2014 in Boise: a fantastic The season of awards......p. 119 Rutgers University. combating event......p.114 plant blindness.....p. 159 From the Editor Reclaim the name: #Iamabotanist is the latest PLANT SCIENCE sensation on the internet! Well, perhaps this is a bit of BULLETIN an overstatement, but for those of us in the discipline, Editorial Committee it is a real ego boost and a bit of ground truthing. We do identify with our specialties and subdisciplines, Volume 60 but the overarching truth that we have in common Christopher Martine is that we are botanists! It is especially timely that (2014) in this issue we publish two articles directly relevant Department of Biology to reclaiming the name. “Reclaim” suggests that Bucknell University there was something very special in the past that Lewisburg, PA 17837 perhaps has lost its luster and value. A century ago [email protected] botany was a premier scientific discipline in the life sciences. It was taught in all the high schools and most colleges and universities. Leaders of the BSA Carolyn M. Wetzel were national leaders in science and many of them (2015) had their botanical roots in Cornell University, as Biology Department well documented by Ed Cobb in his article “Cornell Division of Health and University Celebrates its Botanical Roots.” While Natural Sciences Cornell is exemplary, many institutions throughout Holyoke Community College the country, and especially in the Midwest, were 303 Homestead Ave leading botany to a position of distinction in the Holyoke, MA 01040 development of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Ecoregional Planning in the Interior Low Plateau
    1 CHAPTER 1: ECOREGIONAL PLANNING IN THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1.2. OVERVIEW OF PLANNING 1.2.1. Developing a Plan to Plan 1.2.2. Budget and Workplan 1.3. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.3.1. Ecological Overview 1.3.2. Ecological Systems 1.3.3. Present Land Use CHAPTER 2: PLANNING TEAMS 2.1. INTRODUCTION 2.2. THE STEERING COMMITTEE 2.3. THE CORE TEAM 2.4. TECHNICAL TEAMS 2.5. DESIGN TEAM CHAPTER 3: GATHERING THE PIECES 3.1. INTRODUCTION 3.2. DATA SOURCES AND DATA MANAGEMENT 3.2.1. Conservation Target Data 3.2.2. Geographic Information Systems 3.3. IDENTIFICATION OF CONSERVATION TARGETS, SETTING CONSERVATION GOALS, AND SELECTING TARGET ELEMENT OCCURRENCES 3.3.1. General Guidelines 3.3.2. Terrestrial Natural Communities 3.3.3. Plant Species 3.3.4. Terrestrial Invertebrates 3.3.5. Terrestrial Vertebrates (other than birds) Birds 3.3.6. Aquatic Species 3.3.7. Aquatic Communities 3.3.8. The Conservation Targets CHAPTER 4: ASSEMBLING THE PORTFOLIO 4.1. INTRODUCTION 4.2. DEVELOPING A PRELIMINARY PORTFOLIO 4.3. DESIGNING AND REFINING THE PORTFOLIO 4.3.1. Assessing Preliminary Sites 4.3.2. Representing Matrix Communities CHAPTER 5: ASSESSING THE PORTFOLIO AND SETTING PRIORITES 5.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PORTFOLIO 5.2. IDENTIFYING ACTION SITES 5.2.1. Action Sites 5.2.2. Landscape-Scale Action Sites 5.3. MEETING CONSERVATION GOALS 5.4. PATTERNS OF THREATS AND STRATEGIES IN THE PORTFOLIO 5.4.1. Stresses and Sources of Stress 5.4.2. Strategies CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTING THE CONSERVATION PLAN 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vascular Flora of the San Rafael Swell, Utah
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 43 Number 1 Article 6 1-31-1983 A vascular flora of the San Rafael Swell, Utah James G. Harris Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Harris, James G. (1983) "A vascular flora of the San Rafael Swell, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 43 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol43/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A VASCULAR FLORA OF THE SAN RAFAEL SWELL, UTAH' James G. Harris^ Abstract.— The vegetation of the San Rafael Swell in southeastern Utah is examined based on personal field col- lections and previously collected herbarium specimens in the Brigham Young University Herbarium (BRY). An anno- tated checklist includes information on frequency of occurrence and habitat preference for each entity. Treated are 491 vascular plant taxa from 59 families. The San Rafael Swell is the eroded rem- (1981), Welsh (1978, 1980a, 1980b), Welsh massive in nant of a domal anticline, oval and Atwood (1981), Welsh and Moore (1973), shape, stretching along northeasterly axis a Welsh and Reveal (1977), Welsh et al. (1981); in from Capitol Reef National Park northern monocotyledons, Cronquist et al. (1977). Wayne County to the foot of the Tavaputs The checklist includes 478 vascular plant Plateau in Carbon County.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Crop Wild Relatives of the United States Related to Food Crops Crop Taxon Comments Sugar Maple Acer Saccharum Subsp
    1/12/2015 Native Crop Wild Relatives of the United States Related to Food Crops Crop Taxon Comments Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. floridanum (Chapm.) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. leucoderme (Small) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. nigrum (F. Michx.) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. ozarkense A. E. Murray Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. saccharum Onion Allium schoenoprasum subsp. schoenoprasum Onion Allium tricoccum Aiton Amaranth Amaranthus ×tucsonensis Henrickson Amaranth Amaranthus acanthochiton J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus arenicola I. M. Johnst. Amaranth Amaranthus australis (A. Gray) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus brownii Christoph. & Caum Amaranth Amaranthus californicus (Moq.) S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus cannabinus (L.) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus crassipes Schltdl. Amaranth Amaranthus fimbriatus (Torr.) Benth. ex S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus floridanus (S. Watson) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus greggii S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus polygonoides L. Amaranth Amaranthus powellii subsp. powellii Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Raf. Amaranth Amaranthus tamaulipensis Henrickson Amaranth Amaranthus torreyi (A. Gray) Benth. ex S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus watsonii Standl. Amaranth Amaranthus wrightii S. Watson Potato bean Apios americana Medik. Potato bean Apios priceana B. L. Rob. Pawpaw Asimina ×nashii Kral Pawpaw Asimina incana (W. Bartram) Exell Pawpaw Asimina longifolia Kral Pawpaw Asimina obovata (Willd.) Nash Pawpaw Asimina parviflora (Michx.) Dunal Pawpaw Asimina pygmaea (W. Bartram) Dunal Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Shuttlew. ex Chapm. Pawpaw Asimina tetramera Small Pawpaw Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal Pepper Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser & Pickersgill Pecan/Hickory Carya ×brownii Sarg. Pecan/Hickory Carya ×lecontei Little Pecan/Hickory Carya ×ludoviciana (Ashe) Little Page | 1 1/12/2015 Crop Taxon Comments Pecan/Hickory Carya aquatica (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Literature Cited* Compiled by Franz Stadler
    AppendixE Complete list of literature cited* Compiled by Franz Stadler Aa, A.J. van der 1859. Francq Van Berkhey (Johanes Le). Pp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 194–201 in: Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederlanden, vol. 6. of America 100: 4649–4654. Van Brederode, Haarlem. Adams, K.L. & Wendel, J.F. 2005. Polyploidy and genome Abdel Aal, M., Bohlmann, F., Sarg, T., El-Domiaty, M. & evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135– Nordenstam, B. 1988. Oplopane derivatives from Acrisione 141. denticulata. Phytochemistry 27: 2599–2602. Adanson, M. 1757. Histoire naturelle du Sénégal. Bauche, Paris. Abegaz, B.M., Keige, A.W., Diaz, J.D. & Herz, W. 1994. Adanson, M. 1763. Familles des Plantes. Vincent, Paris. Sesquiterpene lactones and other constituents of Vernonia spe- Adeboye, O.D., Ajayi, S.A., Baidu-Forson, J.J. & Opabode, cies from Ethiopia. Phytochemistry 37: 191–196. J.T. 2005. Seed constraint to cultivation and productivity of Abosi, A.O. & Raseroka, B.H. 2003. In vivo antimalarial ac- African indigenous leaf vegetables. African Journal of Bio tech- tivity of Vernonia amygdalina. British Journal of Biomedical Science nology 4: 1480–1484. 60: 89–91. Adylov, T.A. & Zuckerwanik, T.I. (eds.). 1993. Opredelitel Abrahamson, W.G., Blair, C.P., Eubanks, M.D. & More- rasteniy Srednei Azii, vol. 10. Conspectus fl orae Asiae Mediae, vol. head, S.A. 2003. Sequential radiation of unrelated organ- 10. Isdatelstvo Fan Respubliki Uzbekistan, Tashkent. isms: the gall fl y Eurosta solidaginis and the tumbling fl ower Afolayan, A.J. 2003. Extracts from the shoots of Arctotis arcto- beetle Mordellistena convicta.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park
    VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office February 2010 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: Milo Pyne, Erin Lunsford Jones, and Rickie White. 2010. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2010 NatureServe NatureServe Southern U. S. Regional Office 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ Cover photo: Mature Interior Low Plateau mesophytic forest above the Green River, Mammoth Cave National Park - Photo by Milo Pyne ii Acknowledgments This report was compiled thanks to a team including staff from the National Park Service and NatureServe.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment for the Planning Rule
    Biological Assessment for Threatened, Endangered, and Proposed Species, and Designated and Proposed Critical Habitat for The National Forest System 2008 Final Land Management Planning Rule Background The Forest Service has prepared a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) to examine the potential environmental impacts associated with promulgating the 2008 planning rule. The 2008 rule establishes a new process for developing future land management plans for the National Forest System (NFS). The purpose of the 2008 rule is to replace and improve upon the 2000 planning rule by providing a planning process that is readily understood, is within the agency’s capability to implement, is consistent with the capabilities of NFS lands, and recognizes the strategic programmatic nature of planning. The 2008 planning rule meets the requirements of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) while making cost effective and efficient use of resources allocated to the Agency for land management planning. Background regarding the development of the rule is provided in the preamble to the rule (72 Fed. Reg. 48514 (August 23, 2007)). The purpose of this analysis is to comply with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California order on 30 March 2007 (Civil No. C04-4512-PJH, Judge Hamilton presiding) regarding the Forest Service obligations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This analysis has been prepared to examine whether the Final 2008 planning rule for NFS Land Management Planning has effects on threatened, endangered, and proposed (TEP) species or on designated and proposed critical habitat. The promulgation of the 2008 planning rule is not a major construction activity as defined in the implementing regulations of the ESA (50 CFR 402.02) and the Forest Service has reached a “No Effect” determination.
    [Show full text]