DOCSLIB.ORG

Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office February 2010 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: Milo Pyne, Erin Lunsford Jones, and Rickie White. 2010. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2010 NatureServe NatureServe Southern U. S. Regional Office 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ Cover photo: Mature Interior Low Plateau mesophytic forest above the Green River, Mammoth Cave National Park - Photo by Milo Pyne ii Acknowledgments This report was compiled thanks to a team including staff from the National Park Service and NatureServe. We thank all who helped with any aspect of the preparation, field work, data anlaysis, classification, specimen identification and vouchering, and report writing for this project. In addition to NatureServe staff, several NPS staff helped consult and gather data onsite at Mammoth Cave National Park for this project – Teresa Leibfreid, Joe Meiman, Lillian Scoggins, Michele Weber, Adam Datillo, and others too numerous to name. We thank all of the staff at Mammoth Cave National Park that helped out with permitting, field work, logistics, and housing. In addition, we extend our gratitude to the Cave Research Foundation for allowing us to stay at their facility just outside of the park while doing research here. This report was prepared for Mammoth Cave National Park in cooperation with the Cumberland Piedmont Network, Inventory and Monitoring Division of the Southeast Region, National Park Service, Department of the Interior. We appreciate the work of both Teresa Leibfreid and Bill Moore of the CUPN Network, who provided ongoing logistical help while supporting the project in an encouraging, thoughtful manner. In addition to staff from NPS and NatureServe, we also want to recognize the staff at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill Herbarium (NCU). Assistant Curator Carol Ann McCormick facilitated our work at the herbarium. Curator Alan Weakley looked over our shoulders from time to time to expertly assist in plant identification. Mary Lou Kidd of the herbarium completed some final sewing of the mounted specimens. Rick Olson, of Mammoth Cave NP, and Bill Moore, of the NPS Cumberland-Piedmont Network (CUPN), provided critical review of the final report. Finally, we‟d like to acknowledge the entire NatureServe Ecology South team for their project input: Heather Summer for project management, fieldwork, plant identification, community classification and GIS work including placement of the gridded plots, Carl Nordman for plant ID and early development of the key to communities, and Mary Russo for local description development and responding to database needs. All members of the team contributed a great deal to the final product. We also recognize independent contractor Kim Feeman‟s useful assistance at the park during the field seasons spent there. iii iv Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ v List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ vii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. ix List of Appendices ...................................................................................................................................... xi Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Physiography and Geology of the Study Site .......................................................................................... 4 Previous Vegetation Studies .................................................................................................................... 5 Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Permanent plot establishment.............................................................................................................. 7 Vegetation classification ..................................................................................................................... 9 Vascular plant inventory ..................................................................................................................... 9 Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Vegetation community analysis ........................................................................................................ 11 Discussion/Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 21 Species Inventory .............................................................................................................................. 21 Vegetation community analysis ........................................................................................................ 22 Ecological Community Summary and Management Considerations ................................................ 23 Literature Cited/References ................................................................................................................... 25 Tables and Figures ................................................................................................................................. 29 Figure 1a. Map of western section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. .............. 29 Figure 1b. Map of eastern section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. ............... 30 Figure 1c. Map of southern section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. ............. 31 Figure 2. Species area curves for Mammoth Cave National Park. .................................................... 32 Appendix I. FIELD KEY ........................................................................................................................ 96 Appendix II. USNVC Classification of Plant Associations at Mammoth Cave National Park ....... 112 Appendix III. Plot sheet used for permanent plots ............................................................................. 310 Appendix IV. Photos of selected plots of Mammoth Cave National Park ........................................ 316 v vi List of Figures Figure 1a. Map of western section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. ................ 29 Figure 1b. Map of eastern section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. ................ 30 Figure 1c. Map of southern section of Mammoth Cave National Park with plot locations. .............. 31 Figure 2. Species area curves for Mammoth Cave National Park a) from only the gridded plots and b) from all full plots. ................................................................................................................................. 32 vii viii List of Tables Table 1. Plots established at Mammoth Cave National Park ................................................................ 33 Table 2. List of all plants historically documented at Mammoth Cave National Park ...................... 37 Table 3. List of all vouchers collected by NatureServe at Mammoth Cave National Park ................ 68 Table 4. Tables of vascular plant diversity measures and species total
Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning

    Department of Planning and Zoning

    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees

    Checklist of Illinois Native Trees

    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
  • Guide to Historic Sites in Kentucky

    Guide to Historic Sites in Kentucky

    AMERICAN HERITAGE TRAVELER HERITAGE Guide t o Historic Sites in Kentucky By Molly Marcot Two historic trails, the Wilderness Bull Nelson on the site of this 62-acre Civil War Road and Boone’s Trace, began here park. The grounds contain the 1825 Battlefields and Coal and were traveled by more than 200,000 Pleasant View house, which became settlers between 1775 and 1818. In a Confederate hospital after the battle, 1. Middle Creek nearby London, the Mountain Life slave quarters, and walking trails. One National Battlefield Museum features a recreated 19th- mile north is the visitors center in the On this site in early 1862, volunteer Union century village with seven buildings, 1811 Rogers House, with displays that soldiers led by future president Col. James such as the loom house and barn, include a laser-operated aerial map of Garfield forced Brig. Gen. Humphrey which feature 18th-century pioneer the battle and a collection of 19th- Marshall’s 2,500 Confederates from the tools, rifles, and farm equipment. century guns. (859) 624-0013 or forks of Middle Creek and back to McHargue’s Mill, a half-mile south, visitorcenter.madisoncountyky.us/index.php Virginia. The 450-acre park hosts battle first began operating in 1817. Visitors reenactments during September. Two half- can watch cornmeal being ground and see mile trail loops of the original armies’ posi - more than 50 millstones. (606) 330-2130 Lexington Plantations tions provide views of Kentucky valleys. parks.ky.gov/findparks/recparks/lj www.middlecreek.org or and (606) 886-1341 or Bluegrass ) T H G I 4.
  • Extended Phylogeny of Aquilegia: the Biogeographical and Ecological Patterns of Two Simultaneous but Contrasting Radiations

    Extended Phylogeny of Aquilegia: the Biogeographical and Ecological Patterns of Two Simultaneous but Contrasting Radiations

    Plant Syst Evol (2010) 284:171–185 DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0243-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Extended phylogeny of Aquilegia: the biogeographical and ecological patterns of two simultaneous but contrasting radiations Jesu´s M. Bastida • Julio M. Alca´ntara • Pedro J. Rey • Pablo Vargas • Carlos M. Herrera Received: 29 April 2009 / Accepted: 25 October 2009 / Published online: 4 December 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Studies of the North American columbines respective lineages. The genus originated between 6.18 (Aquilegia, Ranunculaceae) have supported the view that and 6.57 million years (Myr) ago, with the main pulses of adaptive radiations in animal-pollinated plants proceed diversification starting around 3 Myr ago both in Europe through pollinator specialisation and floral differentiation. (1.25–3.96 Myr ago) and North America (1.42–5.01 Myr However, although the diversity of pollinators and floral ago). The type of habitat occupied shifted more often in morphology is much lower in Europe and Asia than in the Euroasiatic lineage, while pollination vectors shifted North America, the number of columbine species is more often in the Asiatic-North American lineage. similar in the three continents. This supports the Moreover, while allopatric speciation predominated in the hypothesis that habitat and pollinator specialisation have European lineage, sympatric speciation acted in the North contributed differently to the radiation of columbines in American one. In conclusion, the radiation of columbines different continents. To establish the basic background to in Europe and North America involved similar rates of test this hypothesis, we expanded the molecular phylog- diversification and took place simultaneously and inde- eny of the genus to include a representative set of species pendently.
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
  • Actualización De La Flora Del Valle De Lerma – Salta, Argentina

    Actualización De La Flora Del Valle De Lerma – Salta, Argentina

    Núm. 49: 1-14 Enero 2020 ISSN electrónico: 2395-9525 Polibotánica ISSN electrónico: 2395-9525 [email protected] Instituto Politécnico Nacional México http://www.polibotanica.mx HELECHOS Y LICOFITAS: ACTUALIZACIÓN DE LA FLORA DEL VALLE DE LERMA – SALTA, ARGENTINA. FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES: AN UPDATE ON THE FLORA OF THE VALLE DE LERMA– SALTA, ARGENTINA. Jarsun, A.M., J.C. Chambi, D.G. Jaimez, D.A. Cacharani y O.G. Martínez. HELECHOS Y LICOFITAS: ACTUALIZACIÓN DE LA FLORA DEL VALLE DE LERMA – SALTA, ARGENTINA. FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES: AN UPDATE ON THE FLORA OF THE VALLE DE LERMA– SALTA, ARGENTINA. Núm. 49: 1-14 México. Enero 2020 Instituto Politécnico Nacional DOI: 10.18387/polibotanica.49.1 1 Núm. 49: 1-14 Enero 2020 ISSN electrónico: 2395-9525 HELECHOS Y LICOFITAS: ACTUALIZACIÓN DE LA FLORA DEL VALLE DE LERMA – SALTA, ARGENTINA. FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES: AN UPDATE ON THE FLORA OF THE VALLE DE LERMA– SALTA, ARGENTINA. A.M. Jarsun Jarsun, A.M., J.C. Chambi, Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del Noroeste Argentino (IBIGEO-CONICET), D.G. Jaimez, D.A. Cacharani Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400 Salta, Argentina y O.G. Martínez. J.C. Chambi HELECHOS Y LICOFITAS: Herbario MCNS, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, ACTUALIZACIÓN DE LA Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400 Salta, Argentina. FLORA DEL VALLE DE LERMA – SALTA, ARGENTINA. D.G. Jaimez D.A. Cacharani Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del Noroeste Argentino (IBIGEO-CONICET), FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES: Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400 Salta, Argentina. AN UPDATE ON THE FLORA OF THE VALLE DE LERMA– SALTA, O.G.
  • S M Acer Saccharinum L

    S M Acer Saccharinum L

    S M Acer saccharinum L. bundant in some localities, silver A maple is a common tree, found throughout the state except along the coast. It grows largely on sandy banks along streams, usually attaining a height of 60–80 feet and a diameter of 2–3 feet. The trunk normally separates into 3 or 4 upright secondary stems, devoid of branches for some distance. The branches are long and slender, often pendulous. The bark on young trees is smooth, gray, slightly tinged with red. On old trees, it is reddish-brown, fur- rowed, and separated into large thin scales that are loose at the bottom.Twigs are chestnut brown and shiny. The leaves are opposite, deeply In Maine, silver maple is most five-lobed; and the edges are irregular common along major rivers. and sharply toothed. The upper surface is pale green, the lower, silvery white. They turn a pale yellow in fall. 76 SILVER MAPLE E L P A M The flowers are on very short stalks and in clusters. They are green- ish-yellow or sometimes pinkish, open- ing early, long before the leaves appear. The fruit is paired, winged and ripens in spring. Frequently, one of the pair does not fully develop. The twigs are curved upward at the tip, orange or red-brown above and green below, slender, with a bitter taste and a rank odor when broken. The wood is softer than that Silver maple has large globe-shaped flower of the hard maple, close-grained, not buds and smaller vegetative buds. durable and easily worked.
  • A List of Grasses and Grasslike Plants of the Oak Openings, Lucas County

    A List of Grasses and Grasslike Plants of the Oak Openings, Lucas County

    A LIST OF THE GRASSES AND GRASSLIKE PLANTS OF THE OAK OPENINGS, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO1 NATHAN WILLIAM EASTERLY Department of Biology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 4-3403 ABSTRACT This report is the second of a series of articles to be prepared as a second "Flora of the Oak Openings." The study represents a comprehensive survey of members of the Cyperaceae, Gramineae, Juncaceae, Sparganiaceae, and Xyridaceae in the Oak Openings region. Of the 202 species listed in this study, 34 species reported by Moseley in 1928 were not found during the present investigation. Fifty-seven species found by the present investi- gator were not observed or reported by Moseley. Many of these species or varieties are rare and do not represent a stable part of the flora. Changes in species present or in fre- quency of occurrence of species collected by both Moseley and Easterly may be explained mainly by the alteration of habitats as the Oak Openings region becomes increasingly urbanized or suburbanized. Some species have increased in frequency on the floodplain of Swan Creek, in wet ditches and on the banks of the Norfolk and Western Railroad right-of-way, along newly constructed roadsides, or on dry sandy sites. INTRODUCTION The grass family ranks third among the large plant families of the world. The family ranks number one as far as total numbers of plants that cover fields, mead- ows, or roadsides are concerned. No other family is used as extensively to pro- vide food or shelter or to create a beautiful landscape. The sedge family does not fare as well in terms of commercial importance, but the sedges do make avail- able forage and food for wild fowl and they do contribute plant cover in wet areas where other plants would not be as well adapted.
  • Licking Creek Woods

    Licking Creek Woods

    LICKING CREEK WOODS The vegetation at this site in the southwestern-most portion of Franklin County has been significantly influenced by the limestone substrate of the forested hills, creek banks and rocky outcrops in this area. Though aerial observations seem to indicate nothing out of the ordinary in this corner of the county, the incredibly rich herbaceous vegetation found at this site makes it one of the top sites for the conservation of biological diversity in the County. This site contains one animal species of concern and a total of 17 plant species of concern, some species that do not occur anywhere else in the state. These species inhabit a variety of habitat types such as a floodplain forest, moist calcareous shale woods, limestone cliffs, mixed deciduous “rich” woods, mesic upland forest, etc. In addition to the plant species of special concern, this site also supports a number of species that are more typical of the Ohio River watershed in Pennsylvania and are therefore noteworthy for their occurrence in Franklin County. These species include Short’s Aster (Aster shortii), Dwarf Larkspur (Delphinium tricorne), Twinleaf (Jeffersonia diphylla), Miami-mist (Phacelia purshii), and Toadshade (Trillium sessile). In a study of plant diversity, a total of 253 plant species in 69 families were found within an area of about four hectares at this site. This entire area represents one of the most diverse plant areas in the state (Klotz and Walck, 1993). Several plant species of concern are found primarily on the rich, forested, calcareous slopes at this site. These include several populations of Jeweled Shooting-star (Dodecatheon meadia), a G5, S2 Pennsylvania-Threatened plant species of concern, a fair-quality population of Limestone Petunia (Ruellia strepens), a G4G5, S2 PA-Threatened plant species of concern, and a small population of Green and Gold (Chrysogonum virginianum), a G5, S1 PA-Endangered plant species of concern.
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA

    NJ Native Plants - USDA

    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
  • General Geological Information for the Tri-States of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee

    General Geological Information for the Tri-States of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee

    General Geological Information for the Tri-States Of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Field Trip to Pound Gap Road Cut U.S. Highway 23 Letcher County, Kentucky September 28 and 29, 2001 Guidebook Number 41 Summaries Prepared by: Bruce A. Rodgers, PG. SEGS Vice President 2001 Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page 1 Table of Contents Section 1 P HYSIOGRAPHIC P ROVINCES OF THE R EGION Appalachian Plateau Province Ridge and Valley Province Blue Ridge Province Other Provinces of Kentucky Other Provinces of Virginia Section 2 R EGIONAL G EOLOGIC S TRUCTURE Kentucky’s Structural Setting Section 3 M INERAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Virginia’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Tennessee’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Kentucky’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Section 4 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON C OAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Coal Wisdom Section 5 A CTIVITIES I NCIDENTAL TO C OAL M INING After the Coal is Mined - Benefaction, Quality Control, Transportation and Reclamation Section 6 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON O IL AND NATURAL G AS R ESOURCES IN THE R EGION Oil and Natural Gas Enlightenment Section 7 E XPOSED UPPER P ALEOZOIC R OCKS OF THE R EGION Carboniferous Systems Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page i Section 8 R EGIONAL G ROUND W ATER R ESOURCES Hydrology of the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region Section 9 P INE M OUNTAIN T HRUST S HEET Geology and Historical Significance of the