DOCSLIB.ORG

Eggert's Sunflower) (Seeds) Are Blackish Or Grayish and Less Than $25,000, Billing Will Occur at Mottled, 5 to 6 Millimeters (0.25 Inches) Termination Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eggert's Sunflower) (Seeds) Are Blackish Or Grayish and Less Than $25,000, Billing Will Occur at Mottled, 5 to 6 Millimeters (0.25 Inches) Termination Date Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 27973 Dated: March 26, 1997. amount, regardless of dollar amount, population each in Dickson, Marion, David J. Barram, does not relieve the agency of paying in and Williamson counties, two (and a Acting Administrator of General Services. full the actual costs. portion of a third) in Maury County, (g) A Reimbursable Work three in Lewis County, four in Lawrence PART 101±21Ð[AMENDED] Authorization request (Form 2957 or County, and six in Coffee County. It is threatened throughout its range by Therefore 41, CFR part 101±21 is other acceptable request) must be habitat alteration; residential, amended as set forth below: completed and approved by GSA and an commercial, or industrial development; 1. The authority citation for 41 CFR agency official certifying that he/she has plant succession; and conversion of its part 101±21 continues to read as the authority to order the services and limited habitat to pasture or croplands. follows: commit the agency to payment. (h) Bills for recurring above-standard Herbicide use, particularly along Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, 40 level services are rendered in advance at roadsides, also poses a threat. This U.S.C. 486(c). an established cost equal to the action extends Federal protection under the Act to Eggert's sunflower. Subpart 101±21.6ÐBillings, Payments, estimated amount. This type of work and Related Budgeting Information for authorization, with the right to cancel EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 1997. Space and Services Furnished by the (subject to incurred costs and ADDRESSES: The complete file for this General Services Administration obligations) upon 60 days notice by rule is available for public inspection, either party must be completed and by appointment, during normal business 2. Section 101±21.604 is amended by forwarded to GSA prior to the hours at the Asheville Field Office, U.S. revising paragraphs (d) through (h) and commencement of the period for which Fish and Wildlife Service, 160 Zillicoa by adding paragraph (i) to read as services are required. With the Street, Asheville, North Carolina 28801. follows: exception of recurring work FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. authorizations for utilities, which GSA § 101±21.604 Billing procedures for J. Allen Ratzlaff at the above address reimbursable charges. may limit to 3-month periods, each (704/258±3939, Ext. 229). recurring type work authorization must * * * * * authorize charges for the full period SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (d) The following basic types of during the fiscal year that the services Background reimbursable work are performed by will be required. These work GSA on a fixed price basis. The fixed Helianthus eggertii (Small) (Eggert's authorizations must always begin and sunflower) is a perennial member of the price is the amount of the Reimbursable end within the same fiscal year. Work Authorization (RWA) which is the aster family (Asteraceae) known only (i) Agencies shall be responsible for from Kentucky, Tennessee, and authorized amount: timely payment and resolving any (1) Non-recurring services performed Alabama. It is a tall (to 2.5 meters [8 billing problems regarding orders they above standard levels of service, such as feet]) plant arising from a short, thick place under GSA contracts. out-of-cycle painting; base, perennating by shallow elongate, (2) Recurring services not included in [FR Doc. 97±13489 Filed 5±21±97; 8:45 am] fleshy rhizomes that can form an the standard level for which a price can BILLING CODE 6820±BR±P extensive network. The plant is smooth, be established; except for some slight roughening on (3) Repairs and alterations in the upper leaf surfaces, and it has a buildings not controlled by GSA; DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR blue-waxy coloration. The lower leaves (4) Special space alterations and are conspicuously whitened. The plant's adjustments performed by GSA in GSA- Fish and Wildlife Service opposite (rarely whorled) leaves are operated buildings, which are requested mostly lanceolate to narrowly ovate, the and financed by other agencies in 50 CFR Part 17 largest being 10 to 20 centimeters (3.9 to accordance with § 101±20.106, 5.7 inches) in length. Leaf edges are RIN 1018±AC74 Reimbursable services, of this chapter; smooth or minutely toothed, and the tip and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife is usually pointed. Large yellow flowers (5) Alteration projects up to the and Plants; Determination of (8 centimeters [3 inches]) are borne on prospectus threshold. Threatened Status for Helianthus the upper third of the stem. Cypsalas (e) Where the amount of the RWA is eggertii (Eggert's Sunflower) (seeds) are blackish or grayish and less than $25,000, billing will occur at mottled, 5 to 6 millimeters (0.25 inches) termination date. Other bills will be AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, long, faintly striated, and with a few rendered at the customer's option, based Interior. scattered trichomes (hairs). Flowering on delivered orders either monthly or ACTION: Final rule. begins in early August and continues quarterly. through mid-September, and achenes (f) RWAs above the prospectus SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife mature from early September to early threshold shall be performed on an Service (Service) determines threatened October (Jones 1991). Jones (1991) actual cost basis. In special status for Helianthus eggertii (Eggert's observed fruit set at between 5 and 25 circumstances, when GSA and the sunflower) under the authority of the seeds per flower head. Seed germination ordering agency agree, non-prospectus Endangered Species Act of 1973, as rates are generally low (rarely exceeding alterations work may be performed on amended (Act). This rare plant is 25 percent) and most require exposure an actual cost basis. GSA will make presently known from an estimated 34 to cold to break dormancy (Heiser et al. every effort to obtain approval and populations in 14 countiesÐin 1969). certification of additional funds before Alabama, one population in Blount Eggert's sunflower develops an incurring any obligations in excess of 10 County; in Kentucky, one population extensive rhizome system, and these percent of the authorized amount or from Grayson and Hardin counties, two rhizomes can live for many years. Thus, $500, whichever is greater. However, populations from Edmonson and Barren the plant does not have to produce failure of GSA to notify the agency that counties, and seven populations from seeds every year to ensure its survival. obligations will exceed the authorized Hart County; in Tennessee, one If environmental conditions change 27974 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1997 / Rules and Regulations (e.g., increased competition, shading, Tennessee new populations were discovered etc.); it can survive for several years by The following information on Eggert's during the status survey, and additional vegetative means, as Jones (1991) noted sunflower in Tennessee is primarily sites were later discovered by R. was the case in several populations. from Jones (1991) and the Tennessee Seymour in the Mammoth Cave area (D. Small (1903) designated the type Natural Heritage Program database. White, KSNPC, 1996, in litt.). The 13 locality of Eggert's sunflower as near Prior to the status survey conducted known sites in Kentucky are distributed White Bluff in Dickson County, by Jones (1991), there were 12 counties as followsÐone population from Tennessee, from specimens collected by in Tennessee with records (a total of 13) Grayson and Hardin counties, two H. Eggert. Beatley (1963) considered this of H. eggertii. Four sites were found to populations from Edmonson and Barren plant a distinct species and that it was have been extirpated (one each in counties, and seven populations from ``conspicuous because of the colonial Coffee, Davidson, Lawrence, and Hart County. Most of these populations have fewer than 15 individual plants, habit and glaucescense.'' In a Williamson counties) and four were with four having only five or fewer comprehensive essay on Helianthus, found to be erroneous records (one each plants. Only two populations occur on Heiser et al. (1969) retained H. eggertii in Dekalb, Grundy, Clay, and Morgan barrens, and half of these are threatened as a distinct species and placed it in the counties). Additional occurrences were by weedy competitors and/or road series Divaricati, being distinguished by discovered during the status survey and maintenance. Five of the thirteen its nearly sessile, glaucous, and glabrous later by the Tennessee Department of Kentucky populations are found entirely leaves. This work pointed out that H. Environment and Conservation (TDEC) or partially on Federal lands (Mammoth eggertii is a hexaploid (n=51) and could (1993, in litt.) and the U.S. Air Force, Cave National Park), two on The Nature have arisen from a cross between H. Arnold Engineering Development Conservancy's (TNC) land and the laevigatus (n=34), a shale barren species Center (AEDC). Several sites in Coffee, remainder are found along roadside of the Allegheny Mountains, and H. Franklin, Lawrence, and Lewis counties rights-of-way or on private lands. decapetalus (n=17), a widespread are probably single populations and are species of the eastern United States. treated as such in this document, Previous Federal Action Spring and Schilling (1991) found H. including the occurrences on AEDC in Federal government actions on this eggertii to have a unique chemical Coffee and Franklin counties. The 20 species began with section 12 of the Act profile. Of the related sunflowers, it is known populations in Tennessee are (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). It directed the most similar to H. laevigatus, which distributed as follows: Coffee CountyÐ Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shares 9 of 12 chemical compounds. six populations; Lawrence CountyÐfour (Smithsonian) to prepare a report on Smith (1957) considered H. eggertii to populations; Franklin CountyÐtwo those plants considered to be be a local minor variant of H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Ecoregional Planning in the Interior Low Plateau
    1 CHAPTER 1: ECOREGIONAL PLANNING IN THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1.2. OVERVIEW OF PLANNING 1.2.1. Developing a Plan to Plan 1.2.2. Budget and Workplan 1.3. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.3.1. Ecological Overview 1.3.2. Ecological Systems 1.3.3. Present Land Use CHAPTER 2: PLANNING TEAMS 2.1. INTRODUCTION 2.2. THE STEERING COMMITTEE 2.3. THE CORE TEAM 2.4. TECHNICAL TEAMS 2.5. DESIGN TEAM CHAPTER 3: GATHERING THE PIECES 3.1. INTRODUCTION 3.2. DATA SOURCES AND DATA MANAGEMENT 3.2.1. Conservation Target Data 3.2.2. Geographic Information Systems 3.3. IDENTIFICATION OF CONSERVATION TARGETS, SETTING CONSERVATION GOALS, AND SELECTING TARGET ELEMENT OCCURRENCES 3.3.1. General Guidelines 3.3.2. Terrestrial Natural Communities 3.3.3. Plant Species 3.3.4. Terrestrial Invertebrates 3.3.5. Terrestrial Vertebrates (other than birds) Birds 3.3.6. Aquatic Species 3.3.7. Aquatic Communities 3.3.8. The Conservation Targets CHAPTER 4: ASSEMBLING THE PORTFOLIO 4.1. INTRODUCTION 4.2. DEVELOPING A PRELIMINARY PORTFOLIO 4.3. DESIGNING AND REFINING THE PORTFOLIO 4.3.1. Assessing Preliminary Sites 4.3.2. Representing Matrix Communities CHAPTER 5: ASSESSING THE PORTFOLIO AND SETTING PRIORITES 5.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PORTFOLIO 5.2. IDENTIFYING ACTION SITES 5.2.1. Action Sites 5.2.2. Landscape-Scale Action Sites 5.3. MEETING CONSERVATION GOALS 5.4. PATTERNS OF THREATS AND STRATEGIES IN THE PORTFOLIO 5.4.1. Stresses and Sources of Stress 5.4.2. Strategies CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTING THE CONSERVATION PLAN 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Crop Wild Relatives of the United States Related to Food Crops Crop Taxon Comments Sugar Maple Acer Saccharum Subsp
    1/12/2015 Native Crop Wild Relatives of the United States Related to Food Crops Crop Taxon Comments Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. floridanum (Chapm.) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. leucoderme (Small) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. nigrum (F. Michx.) Desmarais Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. ozarkense A. E. Murray Sugar Maple Acer saccharum subsp. saccharum Onion Allium schoenoprasum subsp. schoenoprasum Onion Allium tricoccum Aiton Amaranth Amaranthus ×tucsonensis Henrickson Amaranth Amaranthus acanthochiton J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus arenicola I. M. Johnst. Amaranth Amaranthus australis (A. Gray) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus brownii Christoph. & Caum Amaranth Amaranthus californicus (Moq.) S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus cannabinus (L.) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus crassipes Schltdl. Amaranth Amaranthus fimbriatus (Torr.) Benth. ex S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus floridanus (S. Watson) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus greggii S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus polygonoides L. Amaranth Amaranthus powellii subsp. powellii Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Raf. Amaranth Amaranthus tamaulipensis Henrickson Amaranth Amaranthus torreyi (A. Gray) Benth. ex S. Watson Amaranth Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer Amaranth Amaranthus watsonii Standl. Amaranth Amaranthus wrightii S. Watson Potato bean Apios americana Medik. Potato bean Apios priceana B. L. Rob. Pawpaw Asimina ×nashii Kral Pawpaw Asimina incana (W. Bartram) Exell Pawpaw Asimina longifolia Kral Pawpaw Asimina obovata (Willd.) Nash Pawpaw Asimina parviflora (Michx.) Dunal Pawpaw Asimina pygmaea (W. Bartram) Dunal Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Shuttlew. ex Chapm. Pawpaw Asimina tetramera Small Pawpaw Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal Pepper Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser & Pickersgill Pecan/Hickory Carya ×brownii Sarg. Pecan/Hickory Carya ×lecontei Little Pecan/Hickory Carya ×ludoviciana (Ashe) Little Page | 1 1/12/2015 Crop Taxon Comments Pecan/Hickory Carya aquatica (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park
    VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office February 2010 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: Milo Pyne, Erin Lunsford Jones, and Rickie White. 2010. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2010 NatureServe NatureServe Southern U. S. Regional Office 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ Cover photo: Mature Interior Low Plateau mesophytic forest above the Green River, Mammoth Cave National Park - Photo by Milo Pyne ii Acknowledgments This report was compiled thanks to a team including staff from the National Park Service and NatureServe.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment for the Planning Rule
    Biological Assessment for Threatened, Endangered, and Proposed Species, and Designated and Proposed Critical Habitat for The National Forest System 2008 Final Land Management Planning Rule Background The Forest Service has prepared a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) to examine the potential environmental impacts associated with promulgating the 2008 planning rule. The 2008 rule establishes a new process for developing future land management plans for the National Forest System (NFS). The purpose of the 2008 rule is to replace and improve upon the 2000 planning rule by providing a planning process that is readily understood, is within the agency’s capability to implement, is consistent with the capabilities of NFS lands, and recognizes the strategic programmatic nature of planning. The 2008 planning rule meets the requirements of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) while making cost effective and efficient use of resources allocated to the Agency for land management planning. Background regarding the development of the rule is provided in the preamble to the rule (72 Fed. Reg. 48514 (August 23, 2007)). The purpose of this analysis is to comply with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California order on 30 March 2007 (Civil No. C04-4512-PJH, Judge Hamilton presiding) regarding the Forest Service obligations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This analysis has been prepared to examine whether the Final 2008 planning rule for NFS Land Management Planning has effects on threatened, endangered, and proposed (TEP) species or on designated and proposed critical habitat. The promulgation of the 2008 planning rule is not a major construction activity as defined in the implementing regulations of the ESA (50 CFR 402.02) and the Forest Service has reached a “No Effect” determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Inventory List
    Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama June 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................1 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS .................................................................................................................................3 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS.............................................................................5 AMPHIBIANS............................................................................................................................................................................6 BIRDS .........................................................................................................................................................................................7 MAMMALS...............................................................................................................................................................................10 FISHES.....................................................................................................................................................................................12 REPTILES ................................................................................................................................................................................16 CLAMS & MUSSELS ..............................................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Inventory List
    Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama Alabama Natural August 2015 Heritage Program® TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 CHANGES FROM ALNHP TRACKING LIST OF OCTOBER 2012 ............................................... 3 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS ................................................................................................ 6 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS ........................................... 8 VERTEBRATES ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Birds....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenas .................................................................................................................................. 18 Turtles and Tortoises ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Variation in Helianthus: Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future Michael B
    BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS. VOL 13. NO 4. 328 ^340 doi:10.1093/bfgp/elu004 Genomic variation in Helianthus: learning from the past and looking to the future Michael B. Kantar, Gregory J. Baute, Dan G. Bock and Loren H. Rieseberg Advance Access publication date 3 March 2014 Abstract Helianthus is an economically important and genetically diverse genus, containing both evolutionary model species and cultivated species. Genetic variation within this genus has been examined at many different scales, from genome size changes to chromosomal structure to nucleotide variation. The growing amount of genomic resources within the genus has yielded insights into the importance of paleopolyploid events, and how transposable elements can cause rapid genome size increases. The rapidly evolving chromosomes in Helianthus have provided a system whereby it has been possible to study how chromosomal rearrangements impact speciation, adaptation and intro- gression. Population and quantitative genetic studies have used the abundant nucleotide variation to identify a number of candidate genes which may be involved in both local adaptation and domestication. The results from these investigations have provided basic knowledge about evolution and how to utilize genetic resources for both agriculture and conservation. Targeting Helianthus for further study as new technologies emerge will allow for a better understanding of how different types of genomic variation interact and contribute to phenotypic variation in a complex system that is ecologically and economically significant. Keywords: transposableelements;karyotype;nucleotidevariation;hybridization;speciation INTRODUCTION karyotyping methods and high-throughput DNA Genetic variation is the raw material that natural and sequencing, it is now possible to assess genome- artificial selection acts on.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteraceae) Kompleksine Ait Tür Populasyonlarinda Genetik Çeşitliliğin Belirlenmesi
    T.C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ PSEPHELLUS AUCHERIANUS (DC.) BOISS. (ASTERACEAE) KOMPLEKSİNE AİT TÜR POPULASYONLARINDA GENETİK ÇEŞİTLİLİĞİN BELİRLENMESİ MERYEM BOZKURT DOKTORA TEZİ Biyoloji Anabilim Dalını Ağustos-2015 KONYA Her Hakkı Saklıdır TEZ BİLDİRİMİ Bu tezdeki bütün bilgilerin etik davranış ve akademik kurallar çerçevesinde elde edildiğini ve tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada bana ait olmayan her türlü ifade ve bilginin kaynağına eksiksiz atıf yapıldığını bildiririm. DECLARATION PAGE I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Meryem BOZKURT 07.08.2015 ÖZET DOKTORA TEZİ PSEPHELLUS AUCHERIANUS (DC.) BOISS. (ASTERACEAE) KOMPLEKSİNE AİT TÜR POPULASYONLARINDA GENETİK ÇEŞİTLİLİĞİN BELİRLENMESİ Meryem BOZKURT SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ BİYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ ANABİLİM DALI Danışman: Doç. Dr. Tuna UYSAL 2015, 157 Sayfa Jüri Danışman: Doç. Dr. Tuna UYSAL Prof. Dr. Kuddisi ERTUĞRUL Prof. Dr. Leyla AÇIK Prof. Dr. Muhittin DİNÇ Doç. Dr. Emine ARSLAN Bu tez çalışmasıyla Psephellus aucherianus ve yakın akraba olduğu düşünülen Ps. sintenisii ve Ps. yusufeliensis taksonları morfolojik, mikromorfolojik, karyolojik ve moleküler metotlar ile incelenmiş taksonların karakterizasyonu yapılarak, akrabalık ilişkileri ve populasyonların genetik yapıları detaylı bir biçimde ele alınmıştır. Taksonomik olarak yakın akraba takson veya grupların her ne kadar sınırlarını belirlemek kolay olmasada elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda Ps. sintenisii’nin Ps. aucherianus orjinli olduğu ve genetik sürüklenmenin etkisiyle serpantine adapte olarak hem genetik hem de taksonomik açıdan önemli derecede farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Inventory List
    Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama Alabama Natural August 2017 Heritage Program® TABLE OF CONTENTS ALABAMA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM® ........................................................................... 1 CHANGES FROM ALNHP TRACKING LIST OF AUGUST 2015 .................................................. 3 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS ................................................................................................ 5 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS ......................................... 10 VERTEBRATES ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Birds....................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Amphibians ............................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenas .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RONALD L. JONES Foundation Professor Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 859-6
    1 RONALD L. JONES Foundation Professor Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 859-622-6257 (office); 859-893-4529 (cell) [email protected] Updated, January 2013 EDUCATION David Lipscomb College, Nashville, TN., B.A., Biology. 1972. Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. Graduate Courses. 1972-73. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Ph.D., General Biology, 1980. Dissertation: A revision of Aster Section Patentes (Compositae). PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Tropical Science Center (San Jose, Costa Rica) Research Associate, conducted a botanical inventory of Los Cusingos Bird Sanctuary near San Isidro del General, and the surrounding valley of the General River, Spring Semester, 2007 (4 months), Summer, 2008 (1 month), and Spring, 2009 (2 weeks), Summer, 2010 (2 weeks), Summer 2011 (4 weeks). Kentucky Institute of International Studies (Ecuador) Teaching Faculty, taught Tropical Biodiversity and Conservation, class sessions help in the Galapagos Islands, the Andean Highlands, and the Ecuadorean Amazon, summers of 2000, 2002, 2006, 2012. Gulf Coast Research Lab (Ocean Springs, MS) Summer Staff, taught Coastal Vegetation and Special Topics in Coastal Flora, summers of 1994, 1998,1999, 2013 (proposed). Upper Cumberland Biological Station at Tech Aqua (Cookeville, TN) Summer Staff, taught Dendrology, Aquatic Plants, summers of 1983,1985, 1989. 2 Eastern Kentucky University (Richmond, KY) Foundation Professor, 2006-present Professor, 1989-present; Associate Professor, 1984-89. Assistant Professor, 1983-84; Visiting Assistant Professor, 1981-83. Undergraduate Courses Taught at EKU: Introductory Biology, Intro Biology for Teachers, Principles of Biological Science, General Botany, Economic Plants, Conservation of Wildlife Resources, Plant Systematics. Graduate (800 level) or Grad/Undergrad Courses (500/700 level) Taught at EKU: Dendrology, Aquatic and Wetland Plants, Evolution, Field Botany and Ecology for Teachers.
    [Show full text]