HISTORY of AORTIC REGURGITATION by SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BT., G.C.V.O., K.C.B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HISTORY of AORTIC REGURGITATION by SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BT., G.C.V.O., K.C.B HISTORY OF AORTIC REGURGITATION By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BT., G.C.V.O., K.C.B. HASLEMERE, ENGLAND The Histo ry of Aort ic Inco mp et enc e HE history of the recognition pital with palpitation and a loud noise of incompetence of the aortic in his breast synchronous with the beat valves is of interest not only of the heart and audible at some dis- from the rather barren aspect tance from the bedside. At the necropsy of priority, whether an eponym, suchDouglas as found that the heart was enor- Tmaladie de Corrigan or Corrigan's mously enlarged and that the aortic pulse, should be conferred on the first valves were so hard and contracted that person to record a symptom-complex or they allowed the blood to flow back into sign, or on the first to give a full account the ventricle. He had thus heard an of the condition. There is also the par- aortic murmur more than a hundred ticular point that aortic regurgitation, years before the appearance of Laen- which might be regarded as safely en- nec’s “Traite de l’auscultation mediate” trenched in the physician’s province, (1819). owed its discovery in no small degree to I he museum of the Royal College of the activities of surgeons in anatomy Surgeons of England contains a number normal and morbid. of Hunterian specimens showing the William Cowper (1666-1709), a Lon- changes which cause incompetence of don surgeon and anatomist, was in 1705 the semilunar aortic valves. One of these the first to report a morbid change in (number 1554 in the catalogue) was de- the aortic valves; the pulse in his cases scribed in full detail and was also men- was described as “intermittent,” but no tioned by John Hunter in his “Treatise mention was made of a collapsing char- on the Blood” (1794). This, “Mr. Bul- acter. In 1715 an independent account strode’s case,” was in a man about thirty of the valvular lesion and the collapsing years of age with, as the necropsy pulse was published by Raymond de showed, lesions causing aortic and mi- Vieussens (1641-1715), born in a small tral regurgitation; it was stated that “the village with his surname in Rouergue, blood must have flowed back into the who was a physician at Montpellier and cavity of the ventricle again at each was elected a fellow of the Royal So- systole of the artery.” In two other ciety of London in 1688 after the publi- Hunterian specimens the aortic valves, cation of his great “Nevrologia Uni- which were thickened and opaque, were versalis” (1685) based on 560 necropsies. described in the catalogue (1848) as In the same year (1715) James Doug- probably the site of congenital malfor- las (1676-1742), anatomist and the lead- mation. With the help of Mr. W. E. ing obstetrician of his day in London, Thompson of the Hunterian Museum reported the case of a young man whom one of these specimens has been traced he had seen in St. Bartholomew’s Hos- further back in order to determine if the congenital nature of the bicuspid and regarded this case as unique. In aortic valves was recognized before 1844 James Paget recorded acute endo- 1848. In the Hunterian MS., “Dissec- carditis of a bicuspid pulmonary valve in a girl, aged twenty years, with gonor- rhea, and emphasized the liability of congenital bicuspid semilunar valves, aortic or pulmonary, to disease in a very severe form, and thus supported the generalization that malformed parts are specially prone to other morbid change. Osler in 1880 and 1886 emphasized with statistics the danger of such bicuspid valves to superimposed infection. Matthew Baillie (1716-1823) in 1793 referred to the frequency of disease of the aortic valves, which necessarily in- volved a loss of their function, and briefly mentioned a case of John Hunt- er’s in which an aortic segment was much thickened, and had undergone rupture. His “Series of Engravings which are intended to illustrate the morbid anatomy of some of the most important parts of the human body’’ contained one of thickened bicuspid aortic valves (Fasc. I, plate 2, Fig. 5. tions of Morbid Bodies,’’ specimen 85, London, 1803). page 126, it was merely stated that there In 1829 Thomas Hodgkin (1798- were two instead of three aortic semi- 1866), curator of the museum and lec- lunar segments. In the catalogue of turer on morbid anatomy from 1825 to 1830, written by W. Clift (1775-1849). 1837 at Guy’s Hospital, published a val- it was left in doubt whether the bicus- uable account of “retroversion of the pid condition was a congenital confor- valves of the aorta.’’ The paper was in mation or due to inflammation. It there- the form of two letters in 1827 and fore appears that (Sir) James Paget 1829, to * my dear Friend’’ Charles (1814-99), who wrote the accounts of Aston Key (1795-1849), surgeon to the specimens in the 1846-48 catalogue, Guy’s Hospital, who had drawn Hodg- was responsible for the addition about kin’s attention to the condition, as congenital bicuspid valves. The liabil- shown by a specimen he had placed in ity of congenital bicuspid valves, aortic the Guy’s Hospital museum (number or pulmonary, to be attacked by acute 2451, catalogue, 1910). In his catalogue bacterial endocarditis was not fully rec- of the Guy’s Hospital museum in 1829 ognized until the middle of the last Hodgkin listed four specimens of re- century. troversion of the aortic valves (numbers Graves (1796-1853) in 1843 recorded 1422-1425) and to the description of the acute endocarditis on a bicuspid pul- first added the note that C. A. Key was monary valve in a man, aged sixty-six, the first to observe retroversion of the aortic valves, a statement repeated in his Hodgkin gave a good pathological and published paper in the same year, clinical description of the disease. The though he later agreed that Bertin in Guy’s Hospital (Gordon) museum con- 1824 had recorded this lesion (see p. tains a specimen (number 2470 in the 274). Key had in 1814 been appointed catalogue of 1910) stated to have been to perform necropsies at Guy’s Hospi- presented by Hodgkin in 1827, °f the tal, and in 1848, the year before his lesion in a woman aged twenty-eight sudden death from cholera, was elected years. In 1871 Hodgkin’s account of the second president of the Pathological aortic regurgitation was said to be more Society of London, but he does not ap- complete than that of Corrigan: this was pear to have ever recorded his observa- the estimate of Sir Samuel Wilks (1824- tion of retroversion of the aortic valves. 1910), who had in 1856 rescued from Thus, disclaiming any originality, absolute oblivion Hodgkin’s account of lymphadenoma (Hodgkin’s disease). Sir tioned that he and Corrigan had crossed William Hale-White, another loyal cardiological swords in 1830. Guy’s physician, in his article on Hodg- The well-known article widely re- garded as the first description of “per- manent potency of the mouth of the aorta or inadequacy of the aortic valves” by Sir Dominic John Corrigan (1802- 1880), was published in April 1832. It drew an independent and systematic picture, based on eleven cases (two in women). He had been accustomed, he stated, to speak of the condition as “in- adequacy of the aortic valves,” but had adopted “permanent patency” in defer- ence to Elliotson (1830). In one case the disease followed acute rheumatism, oth- erwise the cause was uncertain. The most important divergence of his clin- ical account from subsequent opinion was the statement that the patients were not prone to sudden death. He depre- cated, for aortic reflux, the then ortho- dox treatment of cardiac disease in general, namely antiphlogistic and de- pletory measures, as indeed Hodgkin had done, and also the use of digitalis. kin’s life and work (1924) analyzed the The trying period of early competition paper on retroversion of the valves of and waiting for practice and success was the heart. In 1830 John Elliotson (1791- not without trials for Corrigan. Though 1868) referred to Hodgkin’s paper, but for five successive years (1859-64) presi- was more interested in stenosis than in dent of the King and Queen's College incompetence of the aortic orifice in the of Physicians of Ireland, he was not production of murmurs. He quoted elected when he first came up for admis- Bertin’s earlier observation in 1824 and sion there. Professor T. Percy C. Kirk- said that he had pointed it out to Hodg- patrick, registrar of the College, has kin who readily accepted this matter of most kindly given me the following in- priority about aortic reflux. James formation about this incident: Hope (1801-41) whose “Treatise on the Diseases of the Heart and Great Ves- [Corrigan] was proposed for the honor- ary fellowship of the College on St. Luke’s sels” was published at the end of 1831 day, 1847, and came up for ballot on the (1832), and so before Corrigan’s paper following November 1, when 12 white in April 1832, wrote a short section, ex- beans were cast for him against 15 black, panded with a claim for priority in and he was rejected. It is said that his re- subsequent editions, on disease of the jection was due to a feeling against him aortic valves, in which stress was laid on on account of his connexion with the the jerking character of the pulse in Board of Health which was considered to aortic incompetence.
Recommended publications
  • The Eagle 1946 (Easter)
    THE EAGLE ut jVfagazine SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF Sf 'John's College St. Jol.l. CoIl. Lib, Gamb. VOL UME LIl, Nos. 231-232 PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR SUBSCRIBERS ON L Y MCMXLVII Ct., CONTENTS A Song of the Divine Names . PAGE The next number shortly to be published will cover the 305 academic year 1946/47. Contributions for the number The College During the War . 306 following this should be sent to the Editors of The Eagle, To the College (after six war-years in Egypt) 309 c/o The College Office, St John's College. The Commemoration Sermon, 1946 310 On the Possible Biblical Origin of a Well-Known Line in The The Editors will welcome assistance in making the Chronicle as complete a record as possible of the careers of members Hunting of the Snark 313 of the College. The Paling Fence 315 The Sigh 3 1 5 Johniana . 3 16 Book Review 319 College Chronicle : The Adams Society 321 The Debaj:ing Society . 323 The Finar Society 324 The Historical Society 325 The Medical Society . 326 The Musical Society . 329 The N ashe Society . 333 The Natural Science Club 3·34 The 'P' Club 336 Yet Another Society 337 Association Football 338 The Athletic Club 341 The Chess Club . 341 The Cricket Club 342 The Hockey Club 342 L.M.B.C.. 344 Lawn Tennis Club 352 Rugby Football . 354 The Squash Club 358 College Notes . 358 Obituary: Humphry Davy Rolleston 380 Lewis Erle Shore 383 J ames William Craik 388 Kenneth 0 Thomas Wilson 39 J ames 391 John Ambrose Fleming 402 Roll of Honour 405 The Library .
    [Show full text]
  • Capital, Profession and Medical Technology: Royal College Of
    Medical History, 1997, 41: 150-181 Capital, Profession and Medical Technology: The Electro-Therapeutic Institutes and the Royal College of Physicians, 1888-1922 TAKAHIRO UEYAMA* That it is undesirable that any Fellow or Member of the College should be officially connected with any Company having for its object the treatment of disease for profit. (Resolution of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 25 Oct. 1888.) That subject to the general provisions of Bye-law 190 the College desires so to interpret its Bye-law, Regulations, and Resolutions, as no longer to prohibit the official connection of Fellows and Members with medical institutes, though financed by a company, provided there be no other financial relation than the acceptance of a fixed salary or of fees for medical attendance on a fixed scale, irrespective of the total amount of the profits of the Company. (Resolution of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 1922, replacing the Resolution of 1888.) No Fellow or Member of the College shall be engaged in trade, or dispense medicines, or make any engagement with a Pharmacist [altered from Chemist] or any other person for the supply ofmedicines, or practise Medicine or Surgery in partnership, by deed or otherwise, or be a party to the transfer of patients or of the goodwill of a practice to or from himself for any pecuniary consideration. (Bye-law 178 of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 1922, alterations in italics.)l This paper examines the implications of an historical drama at the Censors' Board of the Royal College of Physicians of London (henceforth RCP) in the late 1880s and 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Medicine in the City of London
    [From Fabricios ab Aquapendente: Opere chirurgiche. Padova, 1684] ANNALS OF MEDICAL HISTORY Third Series, Volume III January, 1941 Number 1 HISTORY OF MEDICINE IN THE CITY OF LONDON By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BT., G.C.V.O., K.C.B. HASLEMERE, ENGLAND HET “City” of London who analysed Bald’s “Leech Book” (ca. (Llyn-din = town on 890), the oldest medical work in Eng­ the lake) lies on the lish and the textbook of Anglo-Saxon north bank of the leeches; the most bulky of the Anglo- I h a m e s a n d Saxon leechdoms is the “Herbarium” stretches north to of that mysterious personality (pseudo-) Finsbury, and east Apuleius Platonicus, who must not be to west from the confused with Lucius Apuleius of Ma- l ower to Temple Bar. The “city” is daura (ca. a.d. 125), the author of “The now one of the smallest of the twenty- Golden Ass.” Payne deprecated the un­ nine municipal divisions of the admin­ due and, relative to the state of opin­ istrative County of London, and is a ion in other countries, exaggerated County corporate, whereas the other references to the imperfections (super­ twenty-eight divisions are metropolitan stitions, magic, exorcisms, charms) of boroughs. Measuring 678 acres, it is Anglo-Saxon medicine, as judged by therefore a much restricted part of the present-day standards, and pointed out present greater London, but its medical that the Anglo-Saxons were long in ad­ history is long and of special interest. vance of other Western nations in the Of Saxon medicine in England there attempt to construct a medical litera­ is not any evidence before the intro­ ture in their own language.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Arthur Monckton Copeman (1862-1947) (From a Portrait by Frank Eastman, R.A., in the Possession of Dr
    Sydney Arthur Monckton Copeman (1862-1947) (From a portrait by Frank Eastman, R.A., in the possession of Dr. W. S. C. Copeman.) Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 25 Sep 2021 at 05:16:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300012722 THE PREVENTION OF SMALLPOX: FROM EDWARD JENNER TO MONCKTON COPEMAN* by SIR ARTHUR SALUSBURY MAcNALTY, K.C.B. MY first and pleasant duty is to express my thanks to the Faculty of the History of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries for appointing me to give the Inaugural Monckton Copeman Lecture. In selecting the 'Prevention of Smallpox from Edward Jenner to Monckton Copeman' as the subject of the Lecture, I value the privilege of paying a tribute to two great benefactors of mankind. It is appropriate at the outset to give you some account of the man in whose memory this Lecture has been founded. OUTLINE OF THE LIFE OF DR. S. MONCKTON COPEMAN Sydney Arthur Monckton Copeman was born at Norwich on 21 February, 1862. His father was the Rev. Canon Arthur Charles Copeman, LL.D., Canon and Rural Dean of Norwich. Before taking Holy Orders, Canon Copeman qualified with the M.B. London in 1848, being gold medallist in anatomy and physiology. Preceding generations of the family were private bankers in Norwich; but medicine was further represented by the Canon's elder brother, Edward Copeman, M.D., F.R.C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • An Article Contributed to an Anniversary Volume in Honor of Doctor Joseph Hersey Pratt: Samuel Jones Gee and His Friends*
    AN ARTICLE CONTRIBUTED TO AN ANNIVERSARY VOLUME IN HONOR OF DOCTOR JOSEPH HERSEY PRATT SAMUEL JONES GEE AND HIS FRIENDS * By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, Bt., G.C.V.O., K.C.B. PERHAPS the best way I can join in a tribute to Joseph Hersey Pratt— the clinical physician^—is to offer a sketch of another clinical physician, at St. Bartholomew's Hospital, with some sidelights on contemporary medical London when I was a student there half a century ago. The names of great physicians have often been linked by their admirers with recently recognized forms of disease, and also with favourite prescriptions—the least of their achievements. Samuel Jones Gee is an example of this eponymous association. Fifty years ago what is now known as posterior basal meningitis or, as Still showed in 1898, chronic meningococcal menin­ gitis of infants was colloquially known in London as " Gee and Barlow's disease " after their account in 1878 of cervical opisthotonos in infants which in his aphorisms Gee later summarized as follows: " not a tuberculous affec­ tion; it is due to a chronic meningitis, of the medulla. It may, however, occur as a symptom in tuberculous affections of this region." In 1899 Sir Thomas Barlow (1845- ) and David Bridge Lees (1846-1915) gave an expanded account of the condition under the title of " posterior basic (occlusive) meningitis; acquired hydrocephalus." These three writers were colleagues at the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, W. C. In 1888 Gee published an article of four pages " On the Coeliac Affec­ tion " beginning " There is a kind of chronic indigestion which is met with in persons of all ages yet is specially apt to affect children between one and five years old." At the time it attracted very little attention perhaps because, like most of his original papers, it appeared in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Goodall, M.D., F.R.C.P
    [From Schurigio: Lithopogia Historico-Medica, Dresden, 1744] ANNALS OF MEDICAL HISTORY Third Series , Volume II January , 1940 Numbe r 1 CHARLES GOODALL, M.D., F.R.C.P. A DEFENDER OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF LONDON By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BT., G.C.V.O., K.C.B. HASLEMERE, ENGLAND HARLES GOODALL (1642- title page of this printed dissertation, 1712) was ail ardent cham- which is in the British Museum, de- pion of the rights of the scribed him as “Carolus Goddal, anglus, Royal College of Physicians Acad. Cant. L. et Coll. Email., ibidem of London and the vigorous opponentnuper alumnus. ” He was incorporated ofC unlicensed “practisers” during most m.d . at Cambridge on November 26 in of his professional life, beginning, by the same year. bringing out a book on the subject, even Settling in London he then attended before he was connected with the Col- the anatomical lectures of Walter Need- lege and lasting until his death when ham (1631-1691?) whom he was des- he was president. He was the son of tined to succeed on April 28, 1691, as Thomas Goodall, of Earl Stonham. Suf- physician to the Charterhouse where he folk. Admitted a pensioner (an ordinary resided, as the regulations of the foun- undergraduate) at Emmanuel College, dation directed (which Needham had Cambridge, on January 20, 1658-9 he not obeyed), with occasional visits to was licensed to practise surgery (C.L.)* his house in Kensington. This charity in 1665. was founded by Thomas Sutton (1532- On June 21, 1670 he “entered on the 1611), a soldier and the richest com- physic line’’ at Leyden and on July 6 of moner of his day, for eighty poverty- that year obtained the doctorate of med- stricken “gentlemen,” soldiers, mer- icine there with his “Disputatio de chants ruined by piracy or shipwreck, haemorrhageis scorbuticis,” which was and servants of the sovereign, and sec- dedicated to his father, Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Riti 5J7h 3E Kri Ca Aci
    I I I - riti 5j7h 3e kri ca aci OC THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONI EDITED BY NORMAN GERALD HORNER, M.A., M.D. ASSISTED BY HUGH CLEGG, M.B., M.R.C.P. VOLUME II, 1936 JULY TO DECEMtBER LONDON: PRINTED AND PIJBLISHED AT THlE OFFICE OF THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, TAVISTOCK SQUARE< LONDON, W.C.1 JULY-DEC., 1936 MEDICAL JOURNAL KEY TO DATES AND PAGES THE following table, giving a key to the dates of issue and the page numbers of the BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL and SUPPLEMENT in the second volume for 1936, may prove convenient to readers in seatch of a reference. Serial Date of Joumal Supplement No. Issue Pages Pages - - 3939 .... July 4 .... 1 56 .... 1 20 3940 .... ,,11 .... 57- 108 .... 21- 32 3941 .... ,18 .... 109- 162 .... 33- 40 3942 .... ,25 .... 163- 210 .... 41- 76 - - 3943 .... Aug. 1 .... 211 268 .... 77 104 3944 .... ,, 8 .... 269- 320 .... 105- 116 3945 . 321 - 374 .... 117- 124 3946 ,,22 375- 412 .... 125- 144 3947 . ... 29 .... 413- 448 .... 145- 152 3948 .... Sept. 5 .... 449 - 522 .... 3949 . 523- 572 .... 153- 160 3950 .... ,,19 .... 573- 610 .... 161 - 168 3951 .... ,,26 .... 611 - 656 .... 169- 180 3952 Oct. 3 .... 657 - 698 .... 181 - 192 - 3953 .... ,,10 .... 699 744 .... 193 - 204 3954 .... ,17 .... 745 - 792 .... 205 - 212 3955 .... ,24 .... 793 - 850 .... 213 - 224 3956 .... ,,31 .... 851 - 902 .... 225 - 244 3957 .... Nov. 7 .... 903 - 956 .... 245 - 256 3958 .... ,,14 .... 957 - 1012 .... 257 - 268 - 3959 .... ,, 21 .... 1013 - 1066 .... 269 284 3960 .... ,,28 .... 1067 - 1124 .... 285 - 296 - 3961 .... Dec. 5 .... 1125 - 1178 .. 297 312 3962 .... ,, 12 .... 1179 - 1242 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of B-Vitamin Deficiency,Deprivation of A-Vitamin
    198 rapidly. The thought of our age was separated from present house, and since then among its eminent that of previous ages by the doctrine of evolution, Fellows the names of Richard Bright, Addison, and which had done at least as much to stimulate the Thomas Watson are prominent. studies of the historian as to guide the researches of Dr. Arnold Chaplin, the Harveian Librarian, then the biologist. The whole of evolutionary teaching gave an account of the library, enumerating some of might be summed up in the phrase that organic the special treasures contained in it, and commenting products are the outcome of their history, and can on the fact that every branch of learning was only be understood when their history is known. represented therein. No great system such as that of modern medicine could be understood without reference to its past. The political history of civilisation had always formed the main topic of school and university education, IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND. yet the study of the conditions which had made that civilisation possible, the origin and development of THE twentieth annual of this Fund was scientific had until been report thought, recently neglected. presented at the annual meeting on July 19th. It Dr. to discuss the achievements in Singer pro-ceeded was announced that the gift from Lord Athelstan of the of the of Medicine of some of department History 22000 a year for 10 years is to be allocated to an more of the in this the eminent exponents subject extension of the on the infective their President of Sir investigations country, including Honour, sarcomata (dogs and fowls) with a view to defining the Norman Moore, and Sir Clifford Allbutt, as showing difference between these and true neoplasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Robert Robertson: Fever Specialist, Eighteenth-Century
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright 1 DR ROBERT ROBERTSON (1742 – 1829): FEVER SPECIALIST, EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY MEDICAL EXPERIMENTER, NAVAL HEALTH REFORMER AND SENIOR PHYSICIAN IN THE ROYAL NAVY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT. Author: BRUCE HAMILTON SHORT Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine University of Sydney November 2013 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS During the research for this thesis I am grateful for the helpful criticism, assistance and stimulus provided by my supervisors to whom I am indebted for their advice and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neural Circulation. the Use of Analogy in Medicine*
    Medical History, 1978, 22: 291-307. THE NEURAL CIRCULATION. THE USE OF ANALOGY IN MEDICINE* by EDWIN CLARKE** I. INTRODUCTION THE HISTORY ofmedicine can be likened to a length ofpatterned fabric, a long tapestry stretching from Prehistory up to the present day, which is being continuously added to. On it are woven the ideas responsible for medicine's advancement, along with factors that influenced their origin and survival: technological, social, religious, financial, political, and others. There are also the social aspects of medicine per se and, in the foreground, the patient. Inspection of an earlier part of the tapestry, say the seventeenth century, reveals that only some pieces of the pattern can be identified. These are the ideas that are still accepted today, and they are therefore, judged to be correct. Those that are not recognized, are the ideas that have not survived and frequently they are given judgment-loaded epithets such as "odd", "curious"', or even "ridiculous", and in the light of today's knowledge they are said to be wrong. And yet it is clear that they are intimately woven into the overall pattern and they cannot, therefore, be neglected. The same is true of medicine today, which includes concepts that in the future may turn out to be incorrect. However, for the moment contemporary weavers are in- corporating them into the growing end of the tapestry of time. When dealing with historical material, there are two cardinal sins that must be resisted. First, modern knowledge must not be used to assess the past. Thus, the seventeenth-entury part of the tapestry cannot be appreciated by peering at it from today's end.
    [Show full text]
  • Innes Smith Collection
    Innes Smith Collection University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: Special Collection Title: Innes Smith Collection Scope: Books on the history of medicine, many of medical biography, dating from the 16th to the early 20th centuries Dates: 1548-1932 Extent: 330 vols. Name of creator: Robert William Innes Smith Administrative / biographical history: Robert William Innes Smith (1872-1933) was a graduate in medicine of Edinburgh University and a general practitioner for thirty three years in the Brightside district of Sheffield. His strong interest in medical history and art brought him some acclaim, and his study of English-speaking students of medicine at the University of Leyden, published in 1932, is regarded as a model of its kind. Locally in Sheffield Innes Smith was highly respected as both medical man and scholar: his pioneer work in the organisation of ambulance services and first-aid stations in the larger steel works made him many friends. On Innes Smith’s death part of his large collection of books and portraits was acquired for the University. The original library is listed in a family inventory: Catalogue of the library of R.W. Innes-Smith. There were at that time some 600 volumes, but some items were sold at auction or to booksellers. The residue of the book collection in this University Library numbers 305, ranging in date from the early 16th century to the early 20th, all bearing the somewhat macabre Innes Smith bookplate. There is a strong bias towards medical biography. For details of the Portraits see under Innes Smith Medical Portrait Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John Richardson, C.B., M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. : the Naturalist of The
    SIR JOHN RICHARDSON, C.B., M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. Photograph from a crayon drawing done about 1830 by Negelen, who also did one of Sir John Franklin, K.C.H. With the Writer’s Compliments. SIR JOHN RICHARDSON, C.B., M.D , LL.D., F.R.S.’ The Naturalist of the Naval Medical Service. By Sie HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, Bt., K.C.B., M.D., D.C.L., LL.D. Physician in Ordinary to H.M. the King. President of the Royal College of Physicians of London. Quite recently, fifty-nine years after his sudden death at his home of retirement, Lancrigg, Grasmere, a memorial plaque has been erected to Sir John Richardson by some of his relatives and descendants in the Parish Church of the Westmorland village, to the churchyard of which William Wordsworth’s grave still draws pious pilgrims. The reproduction (fig. 1) of this simple memorial may perhaps be an excuse for recalling some details of one who, though from the lapse of years almost forgotten, was in the Naval Medical Service for forty-eight years (1807-1855), went on three Arctic expeditions, twice with and once in search of Franklin, was justly famous as a zoologist and naturalist, and during his long term of seventeen years (1838- 1855) at Haslar as Physician and Medical Inspector had under him as very junior officers men, such as Thomas Henry Huxley, Sir Joseph H. Hooker, and Sir Andrew Clark, who afterwards became well known in the allied walks of science and medicine. His life 1 2 was written by the Rev.
    [Show full text]