DOCSLIB.ORG

Let's Talk Recognition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Let's Talk Recognition Australian Embassy Vienna Newsletter, June/July 2012 Australian Embassy and Permanent Mission to the United Nations 1040 Vienna, Mattiellistrasse 2; www.austria.embassy.gov.au Disclaimer: This newsletter is published for the information and convenience of our subscribers in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine. Unless the Australian Embassy in Vienna is specifically identified as the author of the mes- sage, all articles, expressed opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in the Newsletter are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of the Australian Embassy in Vienna. The fact that a particular article or opinion is featured www.austria.embassy.gov.au does not necessarily mean that the Australian Embassy in Vienna has endorsed a message or opinion in any way, verified its accuracy, or its completeness. If you have questions or feedback, please send us an email at: [email protected] Indigenous Australia: Vienna to Sydney: Stephen Wurm Lecture: Events and Links: National Reconciliation Tim Bonyhady on Klimt, Prof Darrell Tryon on Australia-related Events in and NAIDOC weeks: Hoffmann and the story of Language and Society: Austria and the pages 1 to 3 his family: pages 4 to 5 pages 6 to 7 region: page 11 Let’s Talk Recognition Celebrating National Reconciliation and NAIDOC Weeks ach year, from 27 May to 3 June, Na- action towards a better relationship be- tional Reconciliation Week celebrates tween fellow Australians. National Reconcili- Ethe respectful relationships shared by ation week celebrates two important dates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia’s history. 27 May commemorates and other Australians. One month later, in the anniversary of the 1967 referendum, the first full week of July, celebrations are when Australians voted to remove clauses held across Australia to in the Australian Consti- celebrate the history, cul- tution that discriminated ture and achievements of against Aboriginal and Tor- Aboriginal and Torres Strait res Strait Islander people. Islander people during 3 June marks the historic NAIDOC week. “Mabo decision” of 1992, in which the High Court of June and July feature two Australia recognised the important events in ac- special relationship that knowledging and honour- Aboriginal and Torres Strait ing Indigenous Australia, Islander peoples have with namely National Reconcili- the land. ation Week and NAIDOC week, standing for Nation- The case centred on the al Aboriginal and Islander Murray Islands in the east- Day Observance Commit- ern part of the Torres Strait tee week. Islands between Australia and Papua New Guinea. National The Meriam people, led by Reconciliation Week Eddie Koiki Mabo, took the National Reconciliation action to the High Court week is a time for Australians to raise aware- to overturn the doctrine of “terra nullius” (or ness and knowledge of Indigenous history empty land). and culture. It is a reminder to encourage Continued on page 2. he verdict of the Court was that under tionally held in the first full week of July, is Australian law, Indigenous people have celebrated in the Indigenous community, Trights to land and that Australia was nev- as well as in increasing numbers of govern- er terra nullius when Captain Cook arrived ment agencies, schools, local councils and in Australia in 1788. This right is called native workplaces all across Australia. title. The “Mabo decision” stated that the “majority of the Court held that the com- This year’s NAIDCO theme is “Spirit of the mon law of Australia recognises a form of Tent Embassy: 40 years on”. It celebrates native title, where those people have main- the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal Tent tained their connection with the land, and Embassy, residing on the lawn of Old Parlia- where the title has not been extinguished ment House in Australia’s capital Canberra. by acts of Imperial, Colonial, State, Territory It was established by four Indigenous Aus- or Commonwealth government.” tralians, Billy Craige, Bert Williams, Michael Anderson and Tony Coorey to advocate NAIDOC Week the political rights of Australian Aborigines The origins of NAIDOC week, on the other on 27 January 1972. The Embassy renewed hand, can be traced to the emergence of the spirit of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Is- Aboriginal groups in the 1920s that sought lander peoples and became a power- to increase awareness in the wider com- ful symbol of unity. For further information, munity of the status and treatment of In- please refer below.• digenous Australians. NAIDOC week, tradi- National Reconciliation Week is a time for Australians to raise Image above: The 2012 National NAIDOC Poster was de- awareness and knowledge of Indigenous history and culture. signed by Australian artist Amanda Joy Tronc. The poster’s title is “Look at us now”. Asked about what inspired the artist Reconciliation is about building better relationships be- to create the poster, Amanda said that she was shocked to tween Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the realise that most people she knows have never heard of the wider Australian community for the benefit of all Australians. Tent Embassy before: “I knew it existed but never appreci- Reconciliation Australia’s vision is for an Australia that rec- ated what our people and my family had to fight for only 40 ognises and respects the special place, culture, rights and years ago. I researched the four men who founded the Tent contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; Embassy, Billy Craige, Bert Williams, Michael Anderson and and where good relationships between First Australians and Tony Coorey and thought it was important to portray them in other Australians become the foundation for local strength my artwork along with their beach umbrella in front of Par- and success; and the enhancement of Australia’s national liament House. To respect their era, I painted them in black wellbeing. and white to give them a nostalgic look. 40 years on, the foreground shows what we have achieved today because Recognition comes in all sorts of ways and means different of the fruits of their labour.” Amanda goes on to explain the things to different people. Since European settlement, Ab- certain elements of the poster by saying that: “The woman original and Torres Strait Islander people have often been graduating and holding her degree shows our right to an treated unfairly by other Australians. The lack of recognition education. The football star represents our sporting achieve- still inhibits some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people ments. The nurse reflects a positive attitude towards health from feeling valued within the Australian community. and the qualifications earned through hard work and study. The man in his work clothes shows our right to earn a wage, progress and be successful. And finally, the family owning Reconciliation Australia’s programs, such as the Indigenous their home shows our right to buy or rent and live in a home. Governance Awards Project and the Reconciliation Ac- The nine circles throughout the painting show communities tion Plans, along with Reconciliation Australia’s advocacy and togetherness. The two white hands represent identity. and public education work, are about building sustainable The background colours represent the Aboriginal and Tor- frameworks for lasting change in Australia. For more detailed res Strait Islander flags to reflect NAIDOC week. The artwork information, please refer to shows that our history is behind us but our culture is a part of our people, not dwindling but getting stronger the more our www.reconciliation.org.au mob succeed and path the way for the future generations.” www.naidoc.org.au Page 2 Indigenous Programs across the Australian Government - A Selection The National Indigenous Languages Policy confirms the Australian Government’s commitment to keeping Indigenous languages alive, and Indigenous Languages Support funding provides funding for the mainte- nance, documentation, transmission and revival of Indigenous languages - OFTA. Website: www.arts.gov.au/indigenous/ils The Indigenous Culture Support funding provides for the maintenance of Indigenous culture and the transmission of cultural knowledge across age groups -OFTA. Website: www.arts.gov.au/indigenous/ics The National Film and Sound Archive of Australia stores, preserves and provides access to culturally re- stricted materials in accordance with its Indigenous Collections Management Protocols and Guidelines and in conjunction with Indigenous permissions and protocols. Website: http://nfsa.gov.au/site_media/ uploads/file/2010/12/09/Indig-Collection-Protocols-and-Guidelines.pdf The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) manages the world’s most extensive collections of printed, audio and visual materials on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture, history and societies. The goal of AIATSIS is to create further understanding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ cultures, past and present. Website: www.aiatsis.gov.au/ AIATSIS produces Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies. These protocols incor- porate the research practice guidelines set by the Australian Research Council and the National Health and Medical Research Council – AIATSIS. Website: http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/docs/ethics.pdf The Indigenous Repatriation Program aims to return secret sacred objects held in state and territory fund- ed museums,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2002 Contents Academy of the Social Sciences 2001
    2002 Academy of the Social Sciences The Academy THE ACADEMY The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia was established in 1971. Before this date, Academy functions were fulfilled through the Social Science Research Council of Australia, founded in 1942. The membership of the Academy comprises those who have achieved a very high level of scholarly distinction, recognised internationally. The Academy is an autonomous, non-governmental organisation, devoted to the advancement of knowledge and research in the various social sciences. The Academy is a corporate body of social scientists. Its objects are: · to promote excellence in and encourage the advancement of the social sciences in Australia; · to act as a co-ordinating group for the promotion of research and teaching in the social sciences; · to foster excellence in research and to subsidise the publication of studies in the social sciences; · to encourage and assist in the formation of other national associations or institutions for the promotion of the social sciences or any branch of them; · to promote international scholarly cooperation and to act as an Australian national member of international organisations concerned with the social sciences; · to act as consultant and adviser in regard to the social sciences; and · to comment where appropriate on national needs and priorities in the area of the social sciences. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia GPO Box 1956 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Telephone 61 2 6249 1788 Facsimile 61 2 6247 4335 Email [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and State Building in Small States: Pacific and European Perspectives
    Governance and State Building in Small States: Pacific and European Perspectives Seminar co-hosted by the University of Vienna, the Australian National University (ANU), the Australian Embassy, the New Zealand Embassy and the Austrian South Pacific Society (OSPG) 3 July 2012 at 2:00 pm Venue: University of Vienna, Institut für Kultur- und Sozialanthropologie, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG), Hörsaal A, Stiege 1, 4th floor, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Vienna Program Host: Prof Dr Hermann Mückler, President of the Anthropological Society, Department for Cultural and Social Anthropology, University of Vienna 2:00 pm Welcome Gerry McGuire, Deputy Head of Mission, Australian Embassy Amanda Thornton, Second Secretary, New Zealand Embassy Representative of the University of Vienna (TBA) 2:15 pm Interview Anna Appel, sister of Stephen Wurm, and Katharina Hobiger, young scholar on Stephen Wurm 2:30 pm Stephen Wurm lecture 2012 Language and Society: Challenges in Governance and State Building in Small Pacific States, Prof Darrell Tryon, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, College of Asia & the Pacific, Australian National University 3:15 pm Coffee break 3:30 pm Building Social Resilience and Cohesion Through History Teaching and Learning: the Solomon Islands Biographical Dictionary and Historical Encyclopaedia Digital Project, Prof Paul Turnbull, School of History, Philosophy, Religion & Classics, University of Queensland 3:50 pm Traditional Leadership and Colonial Heritage as a Challenge for Governance in Kiribati, Dr Harald Werber, Lecturer, Institute of History, University of Salzburg 4:10 pm Bosnia and Herzegovina: State Building in a Post War Environment, Predrag Jureković, Senior Researcher and Western Balkans Expert, Institute for Peace Support and Conflict Management, Austrian National Defence Academy 4:30 pm Questions and Answers 5:00 pm Closing remarks, Prof Dr Hermann Mückler, President of the Anthropological Society, Department for Cultural and Social Anthropology, University of Vienna 5:10 pm Drinks .
    [Show full text]
  • The East Papuan Languages: a Preliminary Typological Appraisal
    7KH(DVW3DSXDQ/DQJXDJHV$3UHOLPLQDU\7\SRORJLFDO 0LFKDHO'XQQ*HU35HHVLQN$QJHOD7HUULOO$SSUDLVDO Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 41, Number 1, June 2002, pp. 28-62 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI+DZDL L3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/ol.2002.0019 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ol/summary/v041/41.1dunn.html Access provided by Max Planck Digital Library (18 Feb 2016 13:04 GMT) The East Papuan Languages: A Preliminary Typological Appraisal Michael Dunn max planck institute for psycholinguistics, nijmegen Ger Reesink university of leiden and max planck institute for psycholinguistics, nijmegen Angela Terrill australia national university This paper examines the Papuan languages of Island Melanesia, with a view to considering their typological similarities and differences. The East Papuan lan- guages are thought to be the descendants of the languages spoken by the original inhabitants of Island Melanesia, who arrived in the area up to 50,000 years ago. The Oceanic Austronesian languages are thought to have come into the area with the Lapita peoples 3,500 years ago. With this historical backdrop in view, our paper seeks to investigate the linguistic relationships between the scattered Papuan lan- guages of Island Melanesia. To do this, we survey various structural features, including syntactic patterns such as constituent order in clauses and noun phrases and other features of clause structure, paradigmatic structures of pronouns, and the structure of verbal morphology. In particular, we seek to discern similarities between the languages that might call for closer investigation, with a view to estab- lishing genetic relatedness between some or all of the languages. In addition, in examining structural relationships between languages, we aim to discover whether it is possible to distinguish between original Papuan elements and diffused Austro- nesian elements of these languages.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Contribute to a Forthcoming Series of Articles on ‘Aboriginal Historiography’
    An invitation to contribute to a forthcoming series of articles on ‘Aboriginal historiography’ The Editorial Board of Aboriginal History intends publishing a series of articles on the broad theme of ‘Aboriginal historiography’, beginning with Volume 27 (2003). Current debates on the stolen generations, Indigenous labour relations, reconcilia- tion and whether or not ‘genocide’ is an appropriate concept to employ in Australia have led to public discussion of contested approaches to historical interpretation. The Board wishes to encourage a deeper exploration of these historiographical concerns, and that of other historiographical issues. The Editorial Board invites contributions of articles to this Aboriginal historiogra- phy series. Suggested topics are set out below. The list is not exhaustive. Intending contributors should contact the Editor, Ingereth Macfarlane or Deputy Editor, Ian Howie-Willis at Aboriginal History, History, School of Humanities, Austral- ian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Email addresses: [email protected] or [email protected]. Suggested topics • Definitions: What is ‘Aboriginal history’ — something unique, a subset of Aus- tralian history, or of the history of indigenous peoples generally, or of colonial and post-colonial societies? • Is it possible to produce a typology of ‘schools’ of Aboriginal historiography? If so, what would it be, and which historians could be assigned to its various types? Such a typology would consider certain ‘-isms’ and Aboriginal histori- ography: for instance, what have been the perspectives of classical empiricism, neo-Marxism, post-modernism, neo-conservatism etc on Aboriginal History? • An early dominance of anthropology and anthropologists, seen for instance in the 1964 Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Act, which defined ‘Aborig- inal Studies’ as ‘anthropological research’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the Level of Coverage
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 5 (December 2012) Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st Century, ed. by Nicholas Evans and Marian Klamer, pp. 13–33 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/sp05/ 2 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4559 The languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the level of coverage Harald Hammarström Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthopology Sebastian Nordhoff Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthopology The present paper assesses the state of grammatical description of the languages of the Melanesian region based on database of semi- automatically annotated aggregated bibliographical references. 150 years of language description in Melanesia has produced at least some grammatical information for almost half of the languages of Melanesia, almost evenly spread among coastal/non-coastal, Austronesian/non- Austronesian and isolates/large families. Nevertheless, only 15.4% of these languages have a grammar and another 18.7% have a grammar sketch. Compared to Eurasia, Africa and the Americas, the Papua- Austronesian region is the region with the largest number of poorly documented languages and the largest proportion of poorly documented languages. We conclude with some dicussion and remarks on the documentational challenge and its future prospects. 1. INTRODUCTION. We will take Melanesia to be the sub-region of Oceania extending from the Arafura Sea and Western Pacific in the west to Fiji in the east – see the map in figure 1.1 This region is home to no fewer than 1347 (1315 living + 32 recently extinct) attested indigenous languages as per the language/dialect divisions of Lewis (2009), with small adjustments and adding attested extinct languages given in table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Trans New Guinea Family Andrew Pawley and Harald Hammarström
    2 The Trans New Guinea family Andrew Pawley and Harald Hammarström 2.1 Introduction The island of New Guinea is a region of spectacular, deep linguistic diversity.1 It contains roughly 850 languages, which on present evidence fall into at least 18 language families that are not demonstrably related, along with several iso- lates.2 This immense diversity, far greater than that found in the much larger area of Europe, is no doubt mainly a consequence of the fact that New Guinea has been occupied for roughly 50,000 years by peoples organised into small kin-based social groups, lacking overarching political affiliations, and dispersed across a terrain largely dominated by rugged mountains and swampy lowlands, with quite frequent population movements. Among the non-Austronesian families of New Guinea one family stands out for its large membership and wide geographic spread: Trans New Guinea (TNG). With a probable membership of between 300 and 500 discrete languages, plus hundreds of highly divergent dialects, TNG is among the most numerous of the world’s language families.3 TNG languages are spoken from the Bomberai Pen- insula at the western end of mainland New Guinea (132 degrees E) almost to the eastern tip of the island (150 degrees E). Most of the cordillera that runs for more than 2000 kilometers along the centre of New Guinea is occupied exclusively by TNG languages. They are also prominent in much of the lowlands to the south of the cordillera and in patches to the north, especially from central Madang Province eastwards. There are possible outliers spoken on Timor, Alor and Pantar.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Shift in an ‘Importing Culture’: the Cultural Logic of the Arapesh Roads*
    7 Language Shift in an ‘Importing Culture’: The Cultural Logic of the Arapesh Roads* LISE M. DOBRIN Papua New Guineans regarded their local languages as the main symbol of their local identities, which they held very dear. – Stephen Wurm (2003: 26) There is . a tacit acceptance of the ‘one language = one culture’ assumption, and a concentration on phenomena internal to the language or culture in question, with a consequent neglect, even underrating, of boundary problems of all sorts. – Gillian Sankoff (1980a: 118) 7.1 Introduction: The Ethnic Revitalization Paradox IN THIS CHAPTER I attempt to wrestle in an ethnographic way with a problem that is familiar to those concerned with endangered languages. One apt label for this problem in the literature is the ‘Ethnic Revitalization Paradox’, a term that was coined by Rindstedt and Aronsson (2002) to describe the disconnect these authors found between the way people speak about their languages on the one hand, and the way they actually use them on the other.1 In the Quichua-Spanish bilingual community of the Ecuadorean Andes where Rindstedt and Aronsson worked, they found heightened ethnic consciousness, public advocacy for Quichua, and strongly positive mother tongue ideology and rhetoric: ‘I speak Quichua, I don’t want to lose my Indian culture . without [our maternal * The arguments in this chapter were first presented at the Sociolinguistics of Language Endanger- ment workshop organized by David Bradley with funding from the Comité International Permanent de Linguistes in Boulder, Colorado, in July 2011. I am grateful to audiences there and at a University of Virginia Linguistic Anthropology Seminar presentation in Charlottesville, Virginia, in September 2012 for helpful questions and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Binanderean Languages of Papua New Guinea: Reconstruction and Subgrouping
    The Binanderean languages of Papua New Guinea: reconstruction and subgrouping Pacific Linguistics 625 Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, southeast and south Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the School of Culture, History and Language in the College of Asia and the Pacific at The Australian National University. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Publications are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise, who are usually not members of the editorial board. FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: I Wayan Arka and Malcolm Ross (Managing Editors), Mark Donohue, Nicholas Evans, David Nash, Andrew Pawley, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson, and Darrell Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD: Karen Adams, Arizona State University Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Atma Alexander Adelaar, University of Melbourne Jaya Peter Austin, School of Oriental and African Marian Klamer, Universiteit Leiden Studies Harold Koch, The Australian National Byron Bender, University of Hawai‘i University Walter Bisang, Johannes Gutenberg- Frantisek Lichtenberk, University of Universität Mainz Auckland Robert Blust, University of Hawai‘i John Lynch, University of the South Pacific David Bradley, La Trobe University Patrick McConvell, The Australian National Lyle Campbell, University of Hawai’i University James Collins, Northern Illinois University William McGregor, Aarhus Universitet Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute for Ulrike Mosel, Christian-Albrechts- Evolutionary Anthropology Universität zu Kiel Matthew Dryer, State University of Claire Moyse-Faurie, Centre National de la New York at Buffalo Recherche Scientifique Jerold A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Trans New Guinea Family Andrew Pawley and Harald Hammarström
    2 The Trans New Guinea family Andrew Pawley and Harald Hammarström 2.1 Introduction The island of New Guinea is a region of spectacular, deep linguistic diversity.1 It contains roughly 850 languages, which on present evidence fall into at least 18 language families that are not demonstrably related, along with several iso- lates.2 This immense diversity, far greater than that found in the much larger area of Europe, is no doubt mainly a consequence of the fact that New Guinea has been occupied for roughly 50,000 years by peoples organised into small kin-based social groups, lacking overarching political affiliations, and dispersed across a terrain largely dominated by rugged mountains and swampy lowlands, with quite frequent population movements. Among the non-Austronesian families of New Guinea one family stands out for its large membership and wide geographic spread: Trans New Guinea (TNG). With a probable membership of between 300 and 500 discrete languages, plus hundreds of highly divergent dialects, TNG is among the most numerous of the world’s language families.3 TNG languages are spoken from the Bomberai Pen- insula at the western end of mainland New Guinea (132 degrees E) almost to the eastern tip of the island (150 degrees E). Most of the cordillera that runs for more than 2000 kilometers along the centre of New Guinea is occupied exclusively by TNG languages. They are also prominent in much of the lowlands to the south of the cordillera and in patches to the north, especially from central Madang Province eastwards. There are possible outliers spoken on Timor, Alor and Pantar.
    [Show full text]
  • An Australian Example
    Oral Tradition, 28/2 (2013):253-260 Curation of Oral Tradition from Legacy Recordings: An Australian Example Nick Thieberger Introduction Hundreds of hours of ethnographic field recordings and their associated oral tradition were destined to be lost until the Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures (PARADISEC, http://paradisec.org.au) was established in 2003 to digitize and curate this legacy made by Australian academic researchers since the 1960s (Barwick and Thieberger 2006; Thieberger and Barwick 2012).1 These recordings in the languages of the region around Australia (broadly speaking, an area that includes Indonesia, Papua New Guinea [PNG], and the Pacific Islands) have high cultural value and are often the only records in these languages. Many languages in this region are spoken by few people and are in danger of being lost because of the pressure from neighboring languages or metropolitan languages such as Indonesian, Tok Pisin, English, or French, and so the records made a generation or more ago become all the more valuable. However, despite their unique heritage value, these recordings were not eligible to be preserved or curated by any existing Australian collecting institution. A group of linguists and musicologists planned PARADISEC and sought advice from relevant agencies (in particular from the National Library of Australia and the National Film and Sound Archive). This advice was particularly valuable in allowing us to determine appropriate metadata standards (we use Dublin Core and Open Archives Initiative metadata terms as a subset of our catalog’s metadata) and to understand the more hands-on requirements of cleaning and repairing moldy or damaged analog tapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix To
    Online Appendix to Hammarström, Harald & Sebastian Nordhoff. (2012) The languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the level of coverage. In Nicholas Evans & Marian Klamer (eds.), Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st Century (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication 5), 13-34. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ’Are’are [alu] < Austronesian, Nuclear Austronesian, Malayo- Polynesian, Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, Eastern Malayo- Polynesian, Oceanic, Southeast Solomonic, Longgu-Malaita- Makira, Malaita-Makira, Malaita, Southern Malaita Geerts, P. 1970. ’Are’are dictionary (Pacific Linguistics: Series C 14). Canberra: The Australian National University [dictionary 185 pp.] Ivens, W. G. 1931b. A Vocabulary of the Language of Marau Sound, Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies VI. 963–1002 [grammar sketch] Tryon, Darrell T. & B. D. Hackman. 1983. Solomon Islands Languages: An Internal Classification (Pacific Linguistics: Series C 72). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. Bibliography: p. 483-490 [overview, comparative, wordlist viii+490 pp.] ’Auhelawa [kud] < Austronesian, Nuclear Austronesian, Malayo- Polynesian, Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, Eastern Malayo- Polynesian, Oceanic, Western Oceanic linkage, Papuan Tip linkage, Nuclear Papuan Tip linkage, Suauic unknown, A. (2004 [1983?]). Organised phonology data: Auhelawa language [kud] milne bay province http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/abstract.asp?id=49613 1 Lithgow, David. 1987. Language change and relationships in Tubetube and adjacent languages. In Donald C. Laycock & Werner Winter (eds.), A world of language: Papers presented to Professor S. A. Wurm on his 65th birthday (Pacific Linguistics: Series C 100), 393-410. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University [overview, comparative, wordlist] Lithgow, David.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Adolphe Wurm (1922–2001)
    Stephen Adolphe Wurm (1922–2001) On 24 October, 2001, the internationally renowned linguist Stephen Wurm passed away in Calvary Hospital after an extended period of hospitalisation. Stephen (as everyone called him) was the former professor in, and head of department of the Department of Linguistics in the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at the Australian National University, a position he held until he retired in 1987 when the University appointed him Professor Emeritus. Stephen was born in Budapest, Hungary, on 19 August 1922. He enjoyed a childhood in which languages played a major part. He grew up speaking German and Hungarian as his mother tongues but over the years added to his repertoire most of the major languages of the world and some of its lesser known ones, including Australian Aboriginal and Pacific ones. He claimed to have a working knowledge of around fifty languages. Stephen was educated in Vienna where he went on to complete his PhD in 1944 at the Oriental Institute of the University of Vienna in Turkic languages and anthropology with a thesis entitled Der özbekische Dialekt von Andidschan. In 1945 he was offered a lectureship in Altaic linguistics at the University of Vienna, a position he held until 1951. It was during this time that he became interested in the languages of Papua New Guinea, an interest that was later to become his life’s major focus. In pursuit of that he established contact with the Rev. Dr A. Capell, then the foremost anthropological linguist in Australia, who held a position in the Anthropology Department at the University of Sydney.
    [Show full text]