DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington State Rail Plan 2019- 2040

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019-2040 WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 August 2020 Prepared by: Washington State Department of Transportation Rail, Freight, and Ports Division Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at wsdotada@ wsdot.wa.gov or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Notificación de Titulo VI al Público Es la política del Departamento de Transportación del Estado de Washington (WSDOT, por sus siglas en inglés) asegurarse que ninguna persona, por razón de raza, color, origen, nacionalidad o sexo, según provee el Título VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964, pueda ser excluido de la participación, negado los beneficios de o ser discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades. Cualquier persona que crea que su protección bajo el Titulo VI ha sido violada, puede presentar una queja o reclamación ante la Comisión para la Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo de Estados Unidos (EEOC, por sus siglas en inglés). Para obtener información adicional sobre los procedimientos de quejas y/o reclamaciones bajo el Titulo VI y/o información sobre nuestras obligaciones anti-discriminatorias, pueden contactar al coordinador del Título VI en la EEOC 360- 705-7090. Información del Acta Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Este material es disponible en un formato alternativo enviando un email/correo electrónico a la Comisión Estadounidense de Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo [email protected] o llamando gratis al 855- 362-4ADA (4232). Personas sordas o con discapacidad auditiva pueden solicitar llamando Washington State Relay al 711. 20-07-0186 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. 1 1.1 Background and context . 1 1.2 Vision and goals for Washington’s rail system . 2 1.3 Transportation planning in Washington . 4 1.4 Alignment with planning activities . 5 1.5 Plan development . 6 CHAPTER 2 RAIL SYSTEM OVERVIEW . 8 2.1 Rail system elements . 8 2.2 Freight services . 11 2.3 Passenger services. .15 2.4 Strategic Rail Corridor Network . 17 2.5 Roles and responsibilities . .18 CHAPTER 3 FREIGHT RAIL SYSTEM STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES . .21 3.1 Trends that may affect the freight rail system . .21 3.2 Existing and future demand for freight rail transportation . 25 3.3 Class I railroads . 33 3.4 Short line railroads . .35 CHAPTER 4 PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES . .38 4.1 Trends that may affect passenger rail demand . .38 4.2 Long distance . .39 4.3 Intercity . .43 4.4 Commuter . 54 CHAPTER 5 INTEGRATED RAIL SYSTEM . .57 5.1 Rail system capacity . .57 5.2 Multimodal connectivity for freight rail . .65 5.3 Multimodal connectivity for passenger rail . .69 5.4 The rail system in communities. .72 CHAPTER 6 RAIL SYSTEM STRATEGIES . .80 6.1 Freight rail strategies . 80 6.2 Passenger rail strategies. .83 6.3 Integrated rail system strategies . .86 CHAPTER 7 RAIL INVESTMENTS AND INITIATIVES. .92 7.1 Freight rail . 92 7.2 Passenger rail . .96 7.3 Integrated rail system . 100 CHAPTER 8 RAIL FUNDING SOURCES . 106 8.1 Federal . 106 8.2 State. 109 CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSION . 112 APPENDIX A: ILLUSTRATIVE LIST OF INVESTMENTS. 113 APPENDIX B: EXISTING AND FUTURE DEMAND FORECASTING RESULTS OF INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL AND FREIGHT RAIL TRANSPORTATION . 126 APPENDIX C: PASSENGER RAIL MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS AND CANDIDATE IMPROVEMENTS . 151 APPENDIX D: CROSSWALK BETWEEN THE FRA STATE RAIL PLAN GUIDANCE AND THE STATE RAIL PLAN FORMAT . 278 EXHIBITS Exhibit 2-1: Washington state rail system by owner . 9 Exhibit 2-2: Primary rail corridors used for passenger rail services in Washington state . .10 Exhibit 2-3: Short line railroad operators in Washington state . 12 Exhibit 2-4: Palouse River and Coulee City (PCC) rail system. .14 Exhibit 2-5: Strategic Rail Corridor Network designation in Washington state . .17 Exhibit 3-1: How Positive Train Control works . 23 Exhibit 3-2: Freight rail shipment by tonnage in Washington state . .26 Exhibit 3-3: Annual rail freight volume in Washington state by trade type, 2016 (in millions of tons) . 26 Exhibit 3-4: Freight Rail Demand Forecast Scenarios . 27 Exhibit 3-5: Statewide rail tonnage by movement type, 2016 and 2040 forecasted scenarios (table) . 28 Exhibit 3-6: Statewide rail tonnage by movement type, 2016 and 2040 forecasted scenarios . 28 Exhibit 3-7: Statewide rail tonnage by trade type, 2016 and 2040 forecasted scenarios . 29 Exhibit 3-8: Statewide rail tonnage by service type, 2016 and 2040 forecasted scenarios . 30 Exhibit 3-9: Top rail commodities by tonnage, 2016 and forecasted 2040 scenarios. .32 Exhibit 4-1: Empire Builder and Coast Starlight ridership, fiscal year 2000 – 2019. .40 Exhibit 4-2: Empire Builder and Coast Starlight on-time performance, fiscal year 2010 – 2019 . 41 Exhibit 4-3: Empire Builder and Coast Starlight ridership projection, fiscal year 2018 – 2040 . 41 Exhibit 4-4: Amtrak Cascades ridership between 2000 and 2019 . .44 Exhibit 4-5: Amtrak Cascades passenger miles between 2010 and 2019 . 44 Exhibit 4-6: Amtrak Cascades on-time performance between 2010 and 2019 . .45 Exhibit 4-7: Amtrak Cascades operating cost, revenue and farebox recovery rate for Washington-funded trains .46 Exhibit 4-8: Amtrak Cascades scenarios for demand forecasting . .47 Exhibit 4-9: Amtrak Cascades ridership, 2018 and 2040 scenarios . 48 Exhibit 4-10: Amtrak Cascades ridership forecast by year, 2018-2040 . .49 Exhibit 4-11: 2019 Amtrak Cascades delays by category (minutes) between Vancouver, BC and Portland, OR . 51 Exhibit 4-12: Sounder train annual ridership by lines, 2010 – 2019 . 55 Exhibit 5-1: Volume-to-capacity ratios and level of service grades . .58 Exhibit 5-2: Level of service estimation for base and forecast year scenarios. .60 Exhibit 5-3: Mainline level of service analysis for base year 2016 . .61 Exhibit 5-4: Mainline level of service analysis for 2040 Low Growth Scenario . 62 Exhibit 5-5: Mainline level of service analysis for 2040 Moderate Growth Scenario . .63 Exhibit 5-6: Mainline level of service analysis for 2040 High Growth Scenario. .64 Exhibit 5-7: Truck Freight Economic Corridors in Washington state . 68 Exhibit 5-8: Modal connections and supporting infrastructure at Washington state passenger rail stations 70 Exhibit 5-9: Washington rail incidents, 2009 – 2018 . 73 Exhibit 5-10: Washington rail crossing/trespassing incidents, 2010 – 2018 . .73 Exhibit 5-11: Crude oil transportation volume in Washington state by mode, January 1 – December 31, 2018 76 Exhibit 7-1: Freight Rail Investment Bank 2019-2021 projects . 93 Exhibit 7-2: Freight Rail Assistance Program 2019-2021 projects . .94 Exhibit 7-3: PCC system prioritized investment needs by branch line . 95 Exhibit 7-4: Sound Transit System Access Fund projects for Sounder stations . 101 Exhibit 7-5: Washington Rail Crossing Projects Funded by FHWA Section 130 Program (2017 Funding). 102 Exhibit 7-6: Funded grade separation projects . 103 Exhibit 7-7: Unfunded grade separation projects in design phase . 103 Exhibit 7-8: Proposed planning requirements for railroads moving oil in Washington state . 104 Exhibit 8-1: FASTLANE/INFRA awards for rail projects in Washington state . 108 Exhibit 8-2: TIGER and BUILD awards for rail projects in Washington state . 108 Exhibit 8-3: FRIB/FRAP 2019-2021 project locations . 110 WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 | CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and context Rail is an integral part of the statewide multimodal transportation system The Washington State Rail that keeps people and businesses moving. Serving freight and passengers, the rail system provides efficient transportation critical to maintaining our Plan is a single, integrated economy, environment and quality of life. The Washington State Rail Plan plan for both passenger comes during a time of change for rail transportation in the state, with the rail transportation system facing important near and long-term challenges and freight rail that include: • Addressing issues related to the December 2017 Amtrak Cascades derailment at DuPont, WA • Meeting the increasing demand for passenger and freight rail services in Washington in partnership with private rail carriers that own much of the network over which passenger and freight trains operate • Developing more efficient and effective connections between rail and other modes of transportation • Ensuring the sustainability of Washington’s public and private short line railroads that face infrastructure investment needs in order to preserve these important services to communities The Washington State Rail Plan is a single, integrated plan for both passenger and freight rail and is the planning foundation for future actions. To address rail system challenges and identify opportunities for improvement, the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) plan describes the rail system and the state’s interest in it, identifies potential actions to improve the rail system, and recommends strategies consistent with Washington’s’ transportation policy goals of economic vitality, preservation, safety, mobility, environment, and stewardship.
Recommended publications
  • Route Maps & Schedules

    Route Maps & Schedules

    Route Maps & Schedules oregon-point.com/route-landing/ Cascades (Portland-Eugene) The Cascades Route provides daily bus service between Downtown Portland and the University of Oregon in Eugene, serving 5 cities and making a total of 6 stops. Click address for map 5541 5501 5503 5545 5517 5547 5507 Schedule Notes Mon-Fri Sat, Sun, Only Holiday Portland 6:00 am 11:10 12:25 1:30 pm 3:15 pm 7:00 pm 10:00 pm Union Station am pm 800 NW Sixth Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Woodburn 12:05 1:25 pm 2:25 pm 4:10 pm 8:10 pm Memorial Transit pm Facility 2895 Newberg Hwy. Woodburn, OR 97071 Salem 7:15 am 12:30 1:55 pm 2:55 pm 4:35 pm 8:35 pm 11:25 pm Amtrak Station pm 500 13th St. SE Salem, OR 97301 Albany 7:50 am 1:10 pm 2:30 pm 3:25 pm 5:30 pm 9:15 pm 12:05 pm Amtrak Station 110 10th Ave. SW Albany, OR 97321 Eugene 8:40 2:00 3:20 4:05 6:20 10:05 12:40 Amtrak Station am* pm* pm* pm* pm* pm* am* 433 Willamette St. Eugene, OR 97401 1/3 Click address for map 5541 5501 5503 5545 5517 5547 5507 University of Oregon 8:50 am 2:15 pm 3:35 pm 4:20 pm 6:35 pm 10:20 pm 12:50 am Hayward Field 1515 Agate St. Eugene, OR 97403 * = No boardings at this stop. Bus will only stop to drop off passengers and may leave before the time shown.
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
  • The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3

    The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3

    2008 The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3 Grantees 13 Fiscal Sponsorships 28 Financial Highlights 30 Trustees and Staff 33 Committees 34 www.seattlefoundation.org | (206) 622-2294 While the 2008 financial crisis created greater needs in our community, it also gave us reason for hope. 2008 Foundation donors have risen to the challenges that face King County today by generously supporting the organizations effectively working to improve the well-being of our community. The Seattle Foundation’s commitment to building a healthy community for all King County residents remains as strong as ever. In 2008, with our donors, we granted more than $63 million to over 2000 organizations and promising initiatives in King County and beyond. Though our assets declined like most investments nationwide, The Seattle Foundation’s portfolio performed well when benchmarked against comparable endowments. In the longer term, The Seattle Foundation has outperformed portfolios comprised of traditional stocks and bonds due to prudent and responsible stewardship of charitable funds that has been the basis of our investment strategy for decades. The Seattle Foundation is also leading efforts to respond to increasing need in our community. Late last year The Seattle Foundation joined forces with the United Way of King County and other local funders to create the Building Resilience Fund—a three-year, $6 million effort to help local people who have been hardest hit by the economic downturn. Through this fund, we are bolstering the capacity of selected nonprofits to meet increasing basic needs and providing a network of services to put people on the road on self-reliance.
  • AWO Letter of Support for Salmon Bay Bridge

    AWO Letter of Support for Salmon Bay Bridge

    755 Winslow Way East Charles P. Costanzo Suite 105B General Counsel & Vice President – Pacific Region Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 PHONE: 203.980.3051 EMAIL: [email protected] March 15, 2021 The Honorable Pete Buttigieg Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary Buttigieg, On behalf of The American Waterways Operators (AWO), I am pleased to express our support for the Washington Department of Transportation’s application for 2021 INFRA federal discretionary grant funding for the Salmon Bay Bridge Rehabilitation Project. The U.S. tugboat, towboat, and barge industry is a vital segment of America’s transportation system. The industry safely and efficiently moves more than 760 million tons of cargo each year, including more than 60 percent of U.S. export grain, energy sources, and other bulk commodities that are the building blocks of the U.S. economy. The fleet consists of nearly 5,500 tugboats and towboats and over 31,000 barges. These vessels transit 25,000 miles of inland and intracoastal waterways; the Great Lakes; and the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts. Tugboats also provide essential services including ship docking, tanker escort, and bunkering in ports and harbors around the country. Built in the early 1900s, the Salmon Bay Bridge is a vital piece of the multimodal network in the Pacific Northwest. It is a double-track lift bridge that supports multimodal transportation for BNSF freight rail, Amtrak intercity passenger trains, and Sound Transit Sounder North commuter rail service. The Salmon Bay Bridge Rehabilitation Project will return the structure to a state of good repair by replacing the lift bridge counterweight and pivot mechanism components, extending its lifespan another 50 years.
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
  • General Freight Tariff 5000

    General Freight Tariff 5000

    GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 NAMING RULES AND CHARGES GOVERNING DEMURRAGE, SWITCHING AND OTHER ACCESSORIAL AND TERMINAL SERVICES For the following Subscribing Carriers: Railroad Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC ATN Brownsville & Rio Grande International Railroad BRG Cleveland & Cuyohoga Railway, LLC CCRL Chicago Rail Link, LLC CRL Cleveland Harbor Belt Railroad, LLC CHB Central Texas & Colorado River Railway, LLC CTXR Decatur Central Railway, LLC DCC Fulton County Railway, LLC FCR Georgia & Florida Railway, LLC GFRR Georgia Woodlands Railway, LLC GWRC Great Western Railway of Colorado, LLC GWR Illinois Railway, LLC IR Kettle Falls International Railway, LLC KFR Manufacturers' Junction Railway, LLC MJ Nebraska, Kansas, & Colorado Railway, LLC NKCR Newburgh & South Shore Railroad, LLC NSR Northern Ohio & Western Railway, LLC NOW Panhandle Northern Railroad, LLC PNR Peru Industrial Railroad, LLC PIR Sand Springs Railway Company SS Stockton Terminal and Eastern Railroad STE Winchester & Western Railroad, LLC WW This Tariff is also applicable on intrastate traffic, except where expressly provided to the contrary in connection with particular rates and provisions contained herein. ISSUED: December 10, 2019 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2020 ISSUED BY: OmniTRAX Commercial Department Acting as Agent for Subscribing Carriers GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 Check Sheet for Page Revisions Revision 17 Except as otherwise provided, Title Page and through Page 29, inclusive, are effective as of the date shown. Original and revised
  • Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future

    Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future

    Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future As more and more states are incorporating projections of sea-level rise into coastal planning efforts, the states of California, Oregon, and Washington asked the National Research Council to project sea-level rise along their coasts for the years 2030, 2050, and 2100, taking into account the many factors that affect sea-level rise on a local scale. The projections show a sharp distinction at Cape Mendocino in northern California. South of that point, sea-level rise is expected to be very close to global projections; north of that point, sea-level rise is projected to be less than global projections because seismic strain is pushing the land upward. ny significant sea-level In compliance with a rise will pose enor- 2008 executive order, mous risks to the California state agencies have A been incorporating projec- valuable infrastructure, devel- opment, and wetlands that line tions of sea-level rise into much of the 1,600 mile shore- their coastal planning. This line of California, Oregon, and study provides the first Washington. For example, in comprehensive regional San Francisco Bay, two inter- projections of the changes in national airports, the ports of sea level expected in San Francisco and Oakland, a California, Oregon, and naval air station, freeways, Washington. housing developments, and sports stadiums have been Global Sea-Level Rise built on fill that raised the land Following a few thousand level only a few feet above the years of relative stability, highest tides. The San Francisco International Airport (center) global sea level has been Sea-level change is linked and surrounding areas will begin to flood with as rising since the late 19th or to changes in the Earth’s little as 40 cm (16 inches) of sea-level rise, a early 20th century, when climate.
  • Omnitrax Holdings Combined, Inc., and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc.—Control

    Omnitrax Holdings Combined, Inc., and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc.—Control

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/27/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-11235, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36490] OmniTRAX Holdings Combined, Inc., and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc.—Control Exemption—Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC OmniTRAX Holdings Combined, Inc. (OmniTRAX), and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc. (HGS) (collectively, Applicants), both noncarriers, filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to control Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC (SIT), a noncarrier currently controlled by OmniTRAX, once SIT is authorized to commence common carrier operations. This notice of exemption is related to a concurrently filed petition for exemption in Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC—Operation Exemption—in Effingham County, Ga., Docket No. FD 36489. In that proceeding, SIT seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a) to commence common carrier operations on certain trackage that it leased from the track owner, Savannah Industrial Logistics, LLC, another noncarrier holding of OmniTRAX.1 If that petition is approved, SIT will operate as a common carrier over certain trackage in Rincon, Effingham County, Ga., extending from a connection with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) near NSR milepost 16.6 to a connection with CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), near CSXT milepost S484.0, a distance of approximately 11,404 feet. Applicants state that they will control SIT upon SIT’s becoming a Class III rail carrier. According to Applicants, OmniTRAX and HGS are under joint managerial and 1 According to the verified notice, while SIT is currently controlled solely by OmniTRAX, if SIT’s petition to commence common carrier operations in Docket No.
  • Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation As a National Heritage Area

    Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation As a National Heritage Area

    Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION APRIL 2010 The National Maritime Heritage Area feasibility study was guided by the work of a steering committee assembled by the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Steering committee members included: • Dick Thompson (Chair), Principal, Thompson Consulting • Allyson Brooks, Ph.D., Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation • Chris Endresen, Office of Maria Cantwell • Leonard Forsman, Chair, Suquamish Tribe • Chuck Fowler, President, Pacific Northwest Maritime Heritage Council • Senator Karen Fraser, Thurston County • Patricia Lantz, Member, Washington State Heritage Center Trust Board of Trustees • Flo Lentz, King County 4Culture • Jennifer Meisner, Washington Trust for Historic Preservation • Lita Dawn Stanton, Gig Harbor Historic Preservation Coordinator Prepared for the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation by Parametrix Berk & Associates March , 2010 Washington State NATIONAL MARITIME HERITAGE AREA Feasibility Study Preface National Heritage Areas are special places recognized by Congress as having nationally important heritage resources. The request to designate an area as a National Heritage Area is locally initiated,
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting

    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
  • Coast Starlight

    Coast Starlight

    ® Effective October 12, 2020 COAST STARLIGHT serving SEATTLE - TACOMA - PORTLAND - EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD - SACRAMENTO - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA - SANTA BARBARA - LOS ANGELES and intermediate stations Amtrak.com BOOK TRAVEL, CHECK TRAIN STATUS, ACCESS YOUR ETICKET AND MORE THROUGH THE Amtrak app. 1-800-USA-RAIL Service on the Coast Starlight® 11 3Train Number4 14 R Coaches: Reservations required. As indicated in column 3Normal Days of Operation4 TuThSa B Business class service available. Reservations required. For R B s r R B s r more information visit Amtrak.com/business-class. 3On Board Service4 s Private rooms. For more information, visit Amtrak.com/rooms. y l O y l O r Dining service: For more information, visit Amtrak.com/dining. Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up y Café service: For more information, visit Amtrak.com/cafe. 6 5 l b Amtrak Thruway Connection—Vancouver, BC/Seattle, WA Checked baggage at select stations. O On Board Bicycle Racks: We offer a number of different ∑w- l9 45A MoWeSa 0 Dp Seattle, WA (Victoria, BC i)(PT) Ar l7 56P TuThSa services to transport your bike onboard on most routes. Each l10 37A MoWeSa 39 Tacoma, WA ∑w- p l6 50P TuThSa train has different equipment and loading procedures that dictate 11 27A MoWeSa 75 Olympia-Lacey, WA >w- 6 01P TuThSa what service will be offered. Reservations are required and l11 51A MoWeSa 94 Centralia, WA ∑w- 5 36P TuThSa additional charges apply. Visit Amtrak.com/bikes for all the 12 35P MoWeSa 137 Kelso-Longview, WA >w- 4 51P TuThSa details before you book your trip.
  • Transportation Choices 3

    Transportation Choices 3

    Transportation Choices 3 MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE | MOVEMENT OF FREIGHT AND GOODS Introduction Facilities Snapshot This chapter organizes the transportation system into two categories: movement of people, and movement of freight and goods. Movement of people encompasses active transportation, transit, rail, air, and automobiles. Movement of freight and goods encompasses rail, marine cargo, air, vehicles, and pipelines. 3 Three Airports: one commercial, two Community Consistent with federal legislation (23 CFR 450.306) and Washington State Legislation (RCW 47.80.030), the regional transportation system includes: 23 Twenty-three Fixed Transit Routes ▶All state-owned transportation facilities and services (highways, park-and-ride lots, etc); 54 Fifty-Four Miles of Multi-Use Trails ▶All local principal arterials and selected minor arterials the RTPO considers necessary to the plan; 2.1 Multi- ▶Any other transportation facilities and services, existing and Two Vehicles per Household* proposed, including airports, transit facilities and services, roadways, Modal rail facilities, marine transportation facilities, pedestrian/bicycle Transport facilities, etc., that the RTPO considers necessary to complete the 5 regional plan; and Five Rail Lines System ▶Any transportation facility or service that fulfills a regional need or impacts places in the plan, as determined by the RTPO. 4 Four Ports *Source: US Census Bureau, 2014 ACS 5-year estimates. Chapter 3 | Transportation Choices 39 Figure 3-1: JourneyMode to ChoiceWork -ModeJourney Choice to Work in the RTPO, 2014 Movement of People Walk/ Bike, Public Transit, 2.2% Other, 4.3% People commute for a variety of reasons, and likewise, a variety of 1.2% ways. This section includes active transportation, transit, passenger Carpooled, 12.6% rail, passenger air, and passenger vehicles.