DOCSLIB.ORG

Relative Clauses in Dialects of English. a Typological Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relative Clauses in Dialects of English. a Typological Approach RELATIVE CLAUSES IN DIALECTS OF ENGLISH A TYPOLOGICAL APPROACH Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philologischen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br. vorgelegt von Tanja Herrmann aus Oberwarmensteinach WS 2002/03 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Bernd Kortmann Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christian Mair Vorsitzende des Promotionsausschusses der Gemeinsamen Kommission der Philologischen, Philosophischen und Wirtschafts- und Verhaltenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Cheauré Datum der Disputation: 1. Juli 2003 2 CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS.................................................................................................................5 LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS..............................................................6 MARKING CONVENTIONS...........................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................8 2. OBJECT OF STUDY, THEORETICAL BACKGROUND, AIMS 2.1. DEFINITION.......................................................................................................11 2.2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK.......................................................................15 2.3. AIMS ...................................................................................................................18 3. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY 3.1. MATERIAL.........................................................................................................20 3.2. METHODS ..........................................................................................................26 4. RELATED TYPES OF CLAUSES 4.1. Introduction..........................................................................................................28 4.2. TOPICALIZATION STRUCTURES..................................................................28 4.2.1. Topicalization structures resembling adnominal relative clauses: cleft and all-pseudo-cleft .........................................................................29 4.2.2. Adnominal relative clauses resembling topicalization structures: existentials and 'lexically empty' antecedent relative clauses..................32 4.2.3. Topicalization structures resembling nominal relative clauses: pseudo-cleft (and reversed pseudo-cleft).................................................37 4.3. COMPARATIVE CLAUSES..............................................................................37 4.3.1. Comparative clauses resembling adnominal relative clauses .................38 4.3.2. Comparative clauses resembling nominal relative clauses .....................40 4.4. NONFINITE CONSTRUCTIONS ......................................................................41 4.5. BUT-CONSTRUCTIONS ...................................................................................44 5. TYPOLOGY OF RELATIVE CLAUSES 5.1. TYPE OF SUBORDINATION............................................................................45 5.2. LINEAR ORDER OF ANTECEDENT AND RELATIVE CLAUSE ................47 5.3. STRUCTURAL MEANS ....................................................................................48 6. NOMINAL AND SENTENTIAL RELATIVE CLAUSES 6.1. NOMINAL RELATIVE CLAUSES ...................................................................54 6.2. CORRELATIVE DIPTYCHS .............................................................................55 6.3. SENTENTIAL RELATIVE CLAUSES..............................................................56 6.4. RELATIVE JUNCTURES ..................................................................................57 7. ADNOMINAL RELATIVE CLAUSES 7.1. DEFINITION OF THE CATEGORY .................................................................59 7.2. PREVIOUS STUDIES/SURVEYS OF AREAL DISTRIBUTION OF RELATIVE MARKERS: Wright's English Dialect Grammar, Lowman Survey, Survey of English Dialects.....................................................................65 3 7.3. AREAL DISTRIBUTION OF RELATIVE MARKERS IN PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................................70 8. IMPLICATIONAL TENDENCIES OF RELATIVE MARKER USAGE 8.1. Introduction..........................................................................................................91 8.2. TOWARD A SCALE/ HIERARCHY.................................................................91 8.3. SCALE/ HIERARCHY OF BROADNESS OF RELATIVE MARKERS..........93 8.4. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF RELATIVE MARKER USAGE IN TERMS OF THE SCALE/ HIERARCHY ......................................95 8.5. Summary............................................................................................................100 9. RESTRICTIVENESS/ NONRESTRICTIVENESS 9.1. Introduction........................................................................................................102 9.2. RESTRICTIVENESS/ NONRESTRICTIVENESS IN (TRADITIONAL) GRAMMAR .......................................................................................................102 9.3. RESTRICTIVENESS/ NONRESTRICTIVENESS IN DIALECTAL SPEECH.............................................................................................................102 9.4. RESTRICTIVENESS/ NONRESTRICTIVENESS IN INDIVIDUAL REGIONS ..........................................................................................................105 9.5. Summary............................................................................................................109 10. PERSONALITY/ NONPERSONALITY 10.1. Introduction......................................................................................................111 10.2. PERSONALITY/ NONPERSONALITY ACROSS REGIONS .....................111 10.3. Summary..........................................................................................................122 11. PREPOSITION PLACEMENT 11.1. Definition.........................................................................................................123 11.2. PREPOSITION PLACEMENT ACROSS REGIONS ....................................123 12. ACCESSIBILITY HIERARCHY 12.1. Introduction......................................................................................................127 12.2. INDIVIDUAL RELATIVE CLAUSE FORMATION STRATEGIES...........133 12.3. INTERPRETATION 12.3.1. Standard relative markers who, which, that, and zero.........................137 12.3.2. Nonstandard relative markers what and as: Change in progress in terms of the Accessibility Hierarchy...............................................138 12.4. GENITIVE AVOIDANCE ..............................................................................143 12.5. Summary..........................................................................................................146 13. RESUMPTIVE PRONOUNS 13.1. Introduction......................................................................................................148 13.2. Definition.........................................................................................................148 13.3. PRONOUN RETENTION STRATEGY IN TERMS OF THE ACCESSIBILITY HIERARCHY....................................................................148 13.3.1. (Non)Restrictiveness as a factor..........................................................155 13.4. Summary..........................................................................................................157 13.5. FURTHER EMBEDDED RELATIVE CLAUSES VIA RESUMPTIVE PRONOUNS 13.5.1. Introduction .........................................................................................159 4 13.5.2. UNCONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS VIA RESUMPTIVE PRONOUNS .......................................................................................159 13.5.3. Summary .............................................................................................165 13.6. NONREDUCTION..........................................................................................166 14. WHICH AS 'CONNECTOR'? 14.1. Introduction......................................................................................................168 14.2. 'CONNECTOR' WHICH..................................................................................168 14.3. Summary..........................................................................................................175 14.4. ARE THERE PREPOSED RELATIVE CLAUSES?......................................176 15. POSITION OF THE RELATIVE CLAUSE 15.1. Introduction......................................................................................................179 15.2. POSITION OF THE RELATIVE CLAUSE ACROSS REGIONS ................179 15.3. Summary..........................................................................................................186 15.4. COPIES............................................................................................................188 16. RÉSUMÉ ................................................................................................................192 APPENDIX 1 ................................................................................................................201 APPENDIX 2 ................................................................................................................207 APPENDIX 3 ................................................................................................................213
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Going the Pub and Being the Library
    Going the Pub and Being the Library A Microparameter in North-West English Preposi>onal Phrases Boston University Linguis>cs Faculty Spotlight Thursday, Oct 2nd Neil Myler ([email protected]) The United Kingdom 2 England 3 England The North West of England 4 Bit of the North West we’re dealing with 5 Bit of the North West we’re dealing with Scouse 6 Bit of the North West we’re dealing with Woolyback Scouse 7 Scousers, Plas>c Scousers (Placcies) and Woolybacks St Helens, Widnes etc are wools. Huyton, Kirkby, Bootle etc. are borderline. Birkenhead are the biggest wools. Wools want to be Scousers, Scousers don’t want to be wools. Stevie Dunn I AM proud to be classed as a Scouser and here are my defini>ons. Scouser: An individual born within eyesight of the Liver Building or adopted by the en>re city. Must have a Liverpudlian accent and be proud that we sound Australian to all Americans. Plas>c Scousers: Those born in eyesight of the Liver Building, but have to cross water, or those born and living within the city, but wish to speak differently and live elsewhere. Woolybacks: Those who sound like they live near sheep – areas like Manchester, Warrington and Widnes. Lulla h[p://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/scousers-plas>c-scousers-woolybacks--3366630 h[p://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/nostalgia/what-plas>c-scouser-paddy-shennan-3370855 8 Definite Woolybacks The Lancashire Hotpots • Comedy folk band from St Helens • Named aer “Lancashire Hotpot”, a tradi>onal stew. • Note flatcaps, waistcoats etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Art of Poetry Using Dialect in Your Poems
    TEACHING THE ART OF POETRY USING DIALECT IN YOUR POEMS by Liz Berry hinny … glinder … jinnyspins … dayclean1 Choosing to write poems using dialect is like finding a locked box full of treasure. You know there’s all sorts of magical things inside, you just have to find the key that will let you in. So put down your notebook, close your laptop, and start listening to the voices around you. For this is the way in, the place where the strongest dialect poetry starts: a voice you can hear. That’s how writing in Black Country dialect started for me - by listening to the voices of the area I’d grown up in. The Black Country dialect has long been mocked as guttural and middle-earthy but to me it’s beautiful because the people I love best have spoken it. None of them are poets but to me their language is the stuff of poetry. I started listening more carefully, rooting around in the past. It was like digging up my own Staffordshire Hoard; a field full of spectacular words, sounds and phrases glinting out of the muck. I was inspired by other poets who’d written using dialect. The brilliant Faber Book of Vernacular Verse edited by Tom Paulin presents a wonderful alternative poetic tradition. It praises the 'springy, irreverent, chanting, often tender and intimate, vernacular voice … which speaks for an alternative community that is mostly powerless and invisible'. Contemporary poets like Kathleen Jamie, Daljit Nagra and Jen Hadfield continue the tradition in fresh and irresistible ways. Reading their work you’re bowled over by the fizz and charm of dialect and how poetry can be a powerful way of protecting and celebrating the spoken language of regions and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • “Cockney and the Queen”
    “Cockney and the Queen” The importance and development of the accent known as Estuary English Maren Kristine Haugom MA Thesis UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Faculty of Humanities Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages Spring 2012 Abstract For this MA thesis I have chosen to investigate the accent known as Estuary English (EE). Even though it is having a massive impact on the development of the English language (especially in Britain) there are few extensive sources regarding this accent, and even though studies have been conducted they are few and hard to come across. Even linguists agree that there are few sources regarding EE, which makes it an interesting research topic. Due to the structure and (lack of) status of EE it is being discussed by linguists and commoners alike, and the media has acted as a linguistic “battlefield” of sorts where linguists and members of the general public have presented their arguments, suggested definitions, and frustrations regarding the new accent. The fact that the general opinions differ greatly and that definitions are changing continually makes it a very interesting base for research. It is a dynamic topic, a linguistic phenomenon which is happening in our time. As my thesis is being written over the course of only one semester I have chosen not to do field work or conduct a survey, although I will attempt to refer to studies conducted by other researchers where this is feasible. Because of the time limit I have chosen to focus mainly on theoretical aspects, such as the problems regarding a proper definition of EE and the discussion around which phonemic traits are part of the accent.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Number and Month Tip of the Month Clearly Clarified General
    Issue Tip of the General news Plain Language Commission Funny examples Linguistic link number month (PLC) news and of unclear and readers’/website visitors’ English month Clearly letters clarified 2007 • Teesdale District Council’s • New distance-learning courses Take off, listen up, ‘incomprehensible’ report • Our services (editing, crash out Pikestaff 1 • YouGov Poll on management accreditation and training) and jargon corporate membership January • UK and US doublespeak • PLC becomes a limited 2007 company Pikestaff 2 • ‘Improve Your English’ • Why we use ‘z’ rather than ‘s’ Devil of a features in The Independent in words like ‘organization’ disclaimer February • Survey on barriers to • Our distance-learning and on- 2007 youngsters setting up in site courses business • Ruth Thornton’s new book • Competition run by US • Why we chose the name Department for ‘Pikestaff’ Transportation • Stockport Council’s ‘Communication Month’ Pikestaff 3 AVoid craZy • BBC survey on language in • Relaunch of our website I trust this CAPITALS CVs • New articles by Martin Cutts provides the March • Scottish Executive’s baffling and Sarah Carr degree of 2007 cloudification that language • StyleWriter software you require • The Rules of Golf by Bryan Garner Pikestaff 4 Use inclusive • Use of capital letters in legal • Corporate membership I spy with a critical language documents • PLAIN conference in eye April 2007 • Department of Health’s new Amsterdam scheme to accredit producers • Our approach to readability of health information • Letters to The Independent
    [Show full text]
  • Language Variation And. Identity
    LanguageVariation and.Identity in Sunderland (Volume 1) LourdesBurbano-Elizondo Doctor of Philosophy National Centre for English Cultural Tradition (School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics) The University of Sheffield September2008 Acknowledgments First and foremost I would like to expressmy gratitude to the National Centre for English Cultural Tradition for financially supporting this PhD and thus making possiblethe conductof this project. I would also like to thank Joan Beal (NATCECT, School of English Literature, Languageand Linguistics) and Emma Moore (School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics) for supervisingmy study and providing me with invaluable advice and supportthroughout the whole process.Tbanks also to the Departmentof English at EdgeHill University for their supportand facilitation. Thanks must go to the NECTE team for granting me accessto recordings and transcriptions when they were still in the process of completing the corpus. I am indebted to Carmen Llamas, Dom Watt, Paul Foulkes and Warren Maguire who at different stagesin my dataanalysis offered their guidanceand help. I am very grateful to Elizabeth Wiredu (Leaming Support Adviser from the Learning ServicesDepartment of Edge Hill University) for her assistancewith some of the statisticsconducted in the dataanalysis. My thanks are due to Lorenzo and Robin for providing me accommodationevery time I went up to Sunderlandto do my fieldwork. I must also gratefully acknowledgeall the Sunderlandpeople who volunteeredto participatein my study. This study would not havebeen possible without their help. Special thanks go to Anna, Natalia, Heike, Alice, John, Esther and Damien for innumerablefavours, support and encouragement.I must also thank Damien for his patienceand understanding,and his invaluablehelp proof-readingthis work.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Residual Rhoticity in a Non-Rhotic Accent
    INVESTIGATING RESIDUAL RHOTICITY IN A NON-RHOTIC ACCENT Esther Asprey Abstract This paper reports on preliminary findings of a study conducted in the Black Country area of the west midlands of England. The small number of linguistic studies carried out in this region in the last 40 years have not found evidence of the continuing existence of variable rhoticity in the local speech variety. The Survey of English Dialects in the 1950s found low levels of rhoticity among speakers in the location closest to the Black Country, and I examine here similar findings from a detailed study of the variety, carried out between 2003-2006. 1 1. The Black Country region: an overview The Black Country lies to the immediate west of the city of Birmingham: its eastern border adjoins that city. Figure 1 shows its location within the UK. The region is unusual in that it is not an area delimited by political, physical or economic boundaries, nor, unlike some areas with names unconnected to physical or political regions, does it have criteria for being a resident like that of, for example, being born within the sound of Bow Bells for Cockneys. Since the first known written use of the name ‘Black Country’ by Walter White in 1860, residents have been disputing amongst themselves exactly where its boundaries lie. The name ‘Black Country’ is generally acknowledged to stem from the pollution created in the Industrial Revolution. Modern day historians have put forward several definitions of the area’s boundaries. Their theories can be categorised under two main headings: those using the iron industry to define the area, and those using the South Staffordshire coalfield to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonemes, Graphemes and Phonics for Liverpool English 1. Introduction
    Phonemes, graphemes and phonics for Liverpool English Patrick Honeybone Kevin Watson Linguistics and English Language Linguistics and English Language University of Edinburgh Lancaster University 1. Introduction This document is intended mainly to be a resource for those teachers and other professionals who have an interest in spoken English and how it is encoded in the spelling system. We hope that this will include those using reading schemes which are fully or partly phonics-based, such as that advocated by the National Literacy Strategy for England. Most specifically, this piece is intended for those who teach spelling to pupils who have ‘Liverpool’ or ‘Merseyside’ accents, and for others who have an interest in this area. The issues under examination here are thus considered from the perspective of those who speak what we call ‘Liverpool English’, which, as we will see, differs from other varieties of English in a number of important ways. These differences mean that the sets of correspondences between sounds and letters (that is, between ‘phonemes’ and ‘graphemes’, as these things are usually called in the phonics literature and elsewhere) that have been developed for other varieties do not fit Liverpool English perfectly. They need some modifications, and this document aims to indicate what these modifications are. We do not give a full description of Liverpool English here, nor do we provide anything like a full phonics scheme. We focus only on the pronunciation of Liverpool English (so, only on the Liverpool English accent, not on the variety’s lexical or grammatical characteristics), and we do not consider the precise ways in which speech is encoded (speech to text: spelling) or decoded (text to speech: reading) in any detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Varieties, Language Shift and Linguistic Identities Programme
    Regional Varieties, language shift and linguistic identities Programme Wednesday, 12th September 4.00– 5.30pm: Registration 5.30 – 6.00: Welcome by the conference organizers 6 .00 – 7.00: Yaron Matras (University of Manchester) The afterlife of a language: The journey of English Romani from community language to a discourse register 7 pm: Reception Thursday, 13th September 8.30 – 9.30: Registration 9.30 – 10.00: Welcome by the Executive Dean 10.00 – 11.00: Joan Beal (University of Sheffield) Inc: the commodification of languages in the ‘new economy’ 11.00 – 11.30: COFFEE 11.30 – 13.00 Papers Eline Zenner, Dirk Speelman & Carmen Maria Faggion Natalie Braber (Nottingham Trent Dirk Geeraerts (FWO Flanders, (Universidade de Caxias do Sul) University) Diane Davies University of Leuven) Regional Regional varieties in southern (University of Leicester) Charting variation in the use of English as an Brazil: first names modified language change and identity in the identity-marker in two varieties of through contact between an Italian East Midlands. Dutch. dialect and Portuguese. Maya Zara (Edge Hill University) Márcia Cristina do Carmo Lyndon Higgs (University of The role of the retroflex in identity (Universidade Estadual Paulista) Strasbourg) The Black Country construction – a purposeful The variable phonological dialect: solidarity, respect and feature? behaviour of the pretonic mid- disrespect expressed through a dual vowels in Paulista Portuguese. pronoun system. Stefania Marzo (KU Leuven) Evy Virginia Zavala & Roberto Urszula Clark & Team (Aston Ceuleers (University College Brañez (Pontificia Universidad University) “Tings a gwan”: Ghent/Ghent Univerty) The hybrid Católica del Perú) Language Linguistic superdiversity in indexical meaning of multilingual alternation in an affinity space: contemporary minority ethnic varieties: a perceptual approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Towards the Insertion of Black Dada
    MARK BEASLEY Motherfist and her five glossaries: Notes towards the insertion of Black Dada — Black Dada is a way to talk about the future while talking about the past. It is our present moment. The Black Dada must use irrational language. The Black Dada must exploit the logic of identity. Black Dada is neither madness, nor wisdom, nor irony, nor naiveté. Black Dada: we are successive. Black Dada: we are not exclusive. Black Dada: we abhor simpletons and are perfectly capable of an intelligent discussion. The Black Dada’s manifesto is both form and life. Black Dada your history of art. Adam PENDLETON, ‘BLACK Dada MANIFesto’, 2008 By removing all semantic and normative functions of the word the Dada poets released language from its obligation to merely communicate. That is to say, through the rupture of speech, they reordered the code: they made the familiar strange. To what end? Corresponding with the outbreak of the First World War, it was an attempt on the part of the few—Hugo Ball, Emmy Hennings, Tristan Tzara, Jean Arp, Marcel Janco, Richard Huelsenbeck, and Sophie Täuber—to address the acts of the many. Deploring the ‘common sense’ 1 that had led Europe into blood- shed, Dada was for contrary action and contradiction. It was a gibbering, critical response to the brutality of the Somme and Verdun. As such, nonsense became a home for sagacity in the face of senselessness. Choosing the heterogeneous, the frustrating and disruptive above clarity, they created new glossaries and new dialects. In short, there is always a point to be made in nonsense—a point thoroughly explored by Kant—it too has its logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation, Linguistic Hegemony and the Teaching of Literacy in English
    English Teaching: Practice and Critique September, 2013, Volume 12, Number 2 http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2013v12n2art4.pdf pp. 58-75 A sense of place: Variation, linguistic hegemony and the teaching of literacy in English URSZULA CLARK English, School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK ABSTRACT: The ways in which literacy in English is taught in school generally subscribe to and perpetuate the notion of a homogenous, unvaried set of writing conventions associated with the language they represent, especially in relation to spelling and punctuation as well as grammar. Such teaching also perpetuates the myth that there is one “correct” way of language use which is “fixed” and invariant, and that any deviation is at best “incorrect” or “illiterate” and at worst, a threat to social stability. It is also very clear that the linguistic norms associated with standard English are predicated upon and replicate white, cultural hegemony. Yet, at the same time, there are plenty of literary and creative works written by authors from all kinds of different cultural, ethnic and linguistic backgrounds, including canonical ones, where spelling and punctuation are varied and championed as a sign of creativity. In the world beyond school, pupils are also surrounded by variational use of written language, especially in public displays such as shop signs, writing on mugs and t-shirts, posters, graffiti and so on, which link language to place. Equally, the voices we hear in entertainment and public broadcasting, far from being homogenous, celebrate diversity in Englishes. The homes and backgrounds of pupils in our schools, including their linguistic backgrounds, may also be very different either in terms of a different variation of English or languages spoken other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Country Echoes Publication
    BLACK COUNTRY ECHOES: PEOPLE | LANDSCAPE | INDUSTRY | ART A souvenir of the Black Country Echoes Festival 2014 CONTENTS New Chapters in a Centuries-old Story by Paul Quigley 3 A World that Someone Else Owns… by Brendan Jackson 6 Innovation for Survival in a Shifting Landscape: The Story of Rubery Owen by David Owen OBE 10 Goodnight Irene - Poem by Liz Berry 13 Wulfrun Hotel - Poem by Liz Berry 13 Women at Work… Thomas Trevis Smith Ltd Cooperage, Cradley Heath by Heather Wastie 14 Birmingham and The Black Country by Dr Chris Upton 16 In the Shadow of Elisabeth by Greig Campbell 19 Cover illustrations (left to right) Learning the Game by Dr Brian Dakin 23 Top row Year Zero: Black Country by Billy Dosanjh 27 Exterior of George Dyke Ltd Forgemasters, Darlaston. Watercolour by Arthur Lockwood. © Arthur Lockwood Workers at Unigate Dairies, Wolverhampton, 1976-8. © Nick Hedges In His Element - Poem by Dave Reeves 30 British Glass Biennale/ International Festival of Glass, Stourbridge, 2012 © John Plant Chance Brothers Glass Works, circa 1958-63, part of the Jubilee Arts Archive The Enduring Success of Stourbridge Glass by Natasha George 31 2nd row The Extraordinary Ordinary – in Everyday Photographs of The Black Country by Dr Peter Day 36 Picket line, Supreme Quiltings and Raindi Textiles, Smethwick, 1982. © Jubilee Arts Archive Settle - Poem by Dave Reeves 40 3rd row Images of Charleroi by British Glass Biennale/ International Festival of Glass, Stourbridge, 2012 © John Plant Xavier Canonne 41 Black Country photograph by Peter Donnelly. © Simon Donnelly Gaggia (Down the caff-ay) - Poem by Dave Reeves 45 Friar Park, Wednesbury, 1977/8.
    [Show full text]
  • Flamingos in Dudley Zoo’ by Emma Purshouse
    This is a peer-reviewed, post-print (final draft post-refereeing) version of the following published document and is licensed under Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 license: McLoughlin, Nigel F ORCID: 0000-0002-0382-6831 (2020) Text- worlds, blending, and allegory in ‘Flamingos in Dudley Zoo’ by Emma Purshouse. Language and Literature, 29 (4). pp. 389- 403. doi:10.1177/0963947020968664 Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020968664 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963947020968664 EPrint URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/8913 Disclaimer The University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. Text-Worlds, Blending, and Allegory in ‘Flamingos in Dudley Zoo’ by Emma Purshouse Nigel McLoughlin University of Gloucestershire, UK Abstract This paper will develop a cognitive stylistic framework drawn from Conceptual Integration (Blending) Theory (Fauconnier and Turner 2002), and Text World Theory (Werth 1999; Gavins 2007), which uses the idea of elaboration sites (Langacker 2009) as potential structural enablers in mapping across blend spaces.
    [Show full text]