Integrated Watershed Management Programme
Integrated Watershed Management Programme
State Perspective and Strategic Plan (SPSP)
PUNJAB
Submitted to Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India
State Perspective and Strategic Plan for IWMP, DoLR- PUNJAB 1. Introduction: An overview of State. 2. Agro-climatic Zones 3. Demography & Land Distribution 4. Land Use Pattern. 5. Trends in Agriculture & Food productivity. 6. Implementation of Watershed Programmes in the state at present. 7. Strategy for implementation of IWMP. 8. Livelihood Concerns. 9. Institutional Arrangement. 10. Capacity Building. 11. Monitoring and Evaluation. 12. Expected Outcomes.
Source: Statistical Abstract of Punjab; Department of Soil & Water Conservation, Punjab & line departments. State Perspective and Strategic Plan for IWMP – DoLR- PUNJAB
Chapter I
1.0 Introduction
Briefly describe physical features along with physical-cum-political map of the State.
The state of Punjab forms a part of Indo-Gangetic alluvial plane and is composed of sediments of Siwalik Hills and Himalayas brought down and laid by the rivers of Indus system. The exact depth of the alluvium has not been ascertained though it varies from a few meters to over 2000 meters. The state can be divided in to the following major physiographic units. a) Shiwalik hills b) Piedmont plain c) Alluvial plain d) Sand plain e) Flood plain f) Palaeochannels The Shiwalik Hills in the north-east are steeply sloping. The Shiwalik hills occupy nearly 2.6 percent area of the state and cover sizeable area of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, NawanShehar, Rupnagar and S.A.S Nagar districts. The piedmont area forms a transitional zone between the shiwalik hills and alluvial terraces. It is about 10 to 15 km wide and comprises of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, Nawanshaher, Rupnagar and SAS Nagar districts. The Alluvial Plain/ terraces are the old flood plains of the rivers, the remnants of which lie above the level of present river beds. Three major alluvial plains/terraces are popularly known as upper-Bari Doab covering most parts of Tarn Taran, Amritsar and Gurdaspur districts, Bist Doab covering area between Beas and Satluj rivers and Malwa plain area south of river Satluj. The sand dunes are low ridges along the present and old courses of rivers and choes. At present, only 0.56% area of the state is under Sand dunes. The Flood plains of Ravi, Beas, Satluj and Ghaggar rivers and many seasonal rivulets cover nearly 10% area of the state. The Palaeo channels are believed to be the remnants of the old active channels. These areas occupy a low-lying topographic position on the landscape.
2 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.1 Briefly describe drainage systems along with state map indicating major rivers.
The drainage system plays an important role in shaping the landscape of an area due to its erosional and depositional nature. The Satluj, Beas and Ravi rivers form the main drainage system in the state of Punjab. The other main drainage channels in Punjab are Ghahhar river, White Bein, Black Bein, Kiran nala, Chakki River and Sakki Nala. In addition to these major drainage channels, these are numerous choes (seasonal rivulets), originating in the Siwalik hills and drain the Kandi area. The natural gradient of the drainage channels is generally from north- east to south-west direction. In areas, where natural drainage is lacking, artificial drains have been dug up for the disposal of storm water and seepage from waterlogged areas in the state. The drainage network map for the state was updated using the satellite data acquired during the period from 2003-2004 and digitized for critical appraisal of waterlogging, flooding and drainage congestion.
In Punjab, out of the total irrigated area, 29 percent is irrigated by canals and remaining 71 percent by tubewells. There are six major canals system viz. Upper Bari Doab, Sirhind, Bikaner, Rajasthan, Bist Doab and Bhakra. Only Upper Bari Doab Canal is taking off from river Ravi and the other five canals from river Satluj. The canal network has been digitized for better perception of the command area of each major canal and their distributaries.
3 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
4 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.2 Brief description of all river basins
The indo-Gangetic plain, of which the Punjab is a part, stretches from the Yamuna river the east to Sulaiman mountains (Pakistan) in the west and separates the peninsular from the extra-peninsular region. The whole expanse of the plains, from one end to the other, is formed with unvarying monotony of Pleistocene and recent alluvial deposits of the rivers of the Indo-Gangetic system. They have completely shrouded the old land surface to a depth of hundreds of meters. This is one vast level plain with wide eroded channels within which the great rivers have occasionally shifted their beds. The alluvial plain covers nearly two-third of the total geographical area of the state.
The geological facts reveal that the Indo-Gangetic plain owes its origin to a depression of synclinal nature. The origin of this depression or trough is intimately connected with the origin of the mountains, though its exact nature is not known and is a matter of conjecture. This trough was later on filled up with enormous quantities of sediments brought down from the mountains by the rivers of the Indo-Gangetic system. The exact depth of the alluvium has not been ascertained, though it varies from less than 1,000 to over 2,000 meters. The alluvial sdimentse comprise of massive beds of clay, silt, sand and gravels (Sehgal, 1970; Sehgal et al., 1973; Wadia, 1976) Geologically, the state of Punjab is formed by the alluvial deposits of various rivers flowing through Punjab, namely Ravi, Beas, Satluj, Ghaggar and their tributaries. Based upon the period of deposition these are further sub divided into recent, newer and older alluvial deposits.
The Siwalik range in the north-east of Punjab includes middle and lower Siwaliks. Thses hills are formed as a result of the latest phase of Himalayan orogeny. Theses are composed of Pinjore boulders, conglomerates and poorly lithified, soft and friable-sand stone and shales. The age of these deposits vary from Upper Miocene to Lower Pleistocene. The piedmont plain in kandi Belt of Punjab state is characterized by coarse textured, poorly sorted, sediments mixed with gravels and pebbles. It is formed due to coalescence of alluvial fans and is confined to narrow belt along the Siwalik foot hills.
5 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.3 Demarcation of micro-watersheds along with code nos. on a map.
6 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.4 Overview of the State
Table SPSP 1: State Profile*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Population (As per the 2001 Census) % of Total no. of Male Female Total Sl. No. of Total no. Geographical BPL to Name of District Gram Panch- No Blocks of villages area in Ha. total ayats S S SC ST Others SC Others SC Others T T popul- ation 1. Amritsar 9 746 708 267700 315411 1152821 274408 1004199 589819 1594018 29.6 2. Gurdaspur 16 1617 1532 356400 230068 701059 204238 622443 434306 1757808 9 3. Taran Taran 8 487 477 241900 141290 211935 121500 182265 262800 394200 31 4. Hoshiarpur 10 1417 1386 337000 196242 419250 181148 399566 377390 818816 18.48 5. Kapurthala 5 690 618 163000 119163 501453 1066245 206785 225787 976541 23.65 6. Jallandhar 10 950 934 263200 389067 897451 350695 687543 739762 965430 19.57 7. Nawanshahar 5 471 465 126000 109578 154936 101149 140739 210727 295675 0.05 8. Ropar 5 616 597 137600 69312 193946 61464 172368 130776 497091 12.2 9. S.A.S. Nagar 3 415 403 109300 67998 178743 55100 151221 123098 329964 11.6 10. Patiala 8 942 918 331900 200132 671358 176857 585532 376989 1256890 4.8 Fatehgarh 5 444 442 114200 88087 202050 76949 70955 165036 373005 3.6 11. Sahib 12. Ludhiana 12 915 897 370600 415679 1247037 342529 1027586 757962 2274869 12.5 13. Sangrur 9 576 573 360500 293515 494280 257961 427486 551476 921766 26.67 14. Barnala 3 125 124 141400 50273 231221 41211 204226 91494 435447 19.48 15. Moga 5 329 321 223200 151647 322492 133292 287423 284939 600915 3.14 16. Ferozepur 10 1004 968 526300 210329 715895 188080 631803 398409 1347698 2.61 17. Faridkot 2 171 163 147700 104984 56743 94273 654123 199257 176532 2.86 18. Mukatsar 4 234 234 263600 147000 248000 146000 237000 293000 485000 13 19. Bathinda 8 284 280 337600 189652 443157 164980 385506 344632 828663 8 20. Mansa 5 240 238 217100 110296 20198 98593 19786 208889 76098 3.90 GRAND TOTAL 141 12673 1278 5036200 3714350 0 9064025 3314373 0 8098555 7028723 0 17162580 12.18
7 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.5. Economic Development a. Brief description about the economic growth of the State, Growth of net state domestic product, per capita income and comparison to national GDP and per capita income growth rate, sectoral contribution to state domestic product, changes in occupational structure, data for last five years, strategies for future economic growth of the State, any other important information about the State
Punjab has mainly Agriculture based Economy. Its average growth during 10th Plan has been 5.08% and the Average Annual Compound Growth rate of gross State Income during 2006-07 has been 6.32%. The Net State domestic Product at Factor Cost at current Prices has been Rs. 109459.44 Crores in the Year 2006-07 which has grown by 12.4% against previous year figure. The Per capita Income at current prices in Punjab has been Rs. 40566/- as compared to the National figure of Rs. 29642/- in the year 2006-07. The Gross State Domestic product was Rs. 123397.25 Crores in the Year 2006-07 which constitutes a significant share of the National GDP. The per Capita Income Growth Rate in the state has been more than 38% during the 10th Plan period. Agriculture with 30%, Industry 14% and Services (Tertiary) Sector with 44% are the major contributors in the Gross State Domestic product. From the Year 2000 to 2006, the occupation in the Govt. Sector has decreased from 69.73% to 66.78% while that in the Private sector has increased from 30.27% to 33.22%. for better economic growth in the future, the Agriculture Sector needs a major push/ support.
8 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
b. Role of watershed management in the State – Importance of watershed programme for the State, historical background of watershed development in the State, current status, expected outcomes, etc. Out of total 50.36 lakh Ha. of geographical area of Punjab, 41.84 Lakh Ha. (83%) is under cultivation. Out of which, 40.78 Lakh Ha. (97.5%) is irrigated. However, only 11.93 Lakh Ha. (28.5%) of cultivated area is irrigated by canals and the remaining 29.91 Lakh Ha. (71.5%) cultivated area depends upon rainfall and groundwater for irrigation. The uneven & erratic rainfall over the years has lead to over-exploitation of the ground water resources of the state to the extent that 103 blocks out of total 141 blocks have been declared 'Over-exploited' and the ground water table is depleting at an average rate of 50cm annually. Poor ground water quality & water-logging is a major challenge in a few areas of South-western districts. Further, rampant Paddy-wheat Cycle in about 34.67 Lakh Ha. (83%) has caused severe damage to the soil health & structure in 39% area of the state. In this context, Watershed Management Programmes have become highly important for not only reversing the trend of deteriorating quantity & quality of ground water but also to prevent further soil degradation.
Watershed Development started by the GOI Ministry of Agriculture during the 8th Plan with the National Watershed Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) and Flood Prone River-Ghaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP) schemes in the Northern kandi area (5.38 Lakh Ha., nearly 10% of the total geographical area) districts of Mohali, Ropar, Nawanshaher, Gurdaspur & Hoshiarpur districts. The All India Soil & Land Use Survey (AISLUS) has divided this area into 138 watersheds comprising of 5.16 Lakh Ha. of treatable area, out of which 97 watersheds have already been taken up covering an area of 1.30 lakh Ha.
The Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development was started during the 10th Plan period. Till date, 16 projects have been started in 12 districts covering an area of 0.66 Lakh Ha. These Projects have been formulated based on the local problems of soil & water in the project area. 3 more IWDP projects are being proposed covering 0.35 Lakh Ha. in 3 districts.
All the above programmes of Watershed Development shall play a big role not only in improving the state of soil & water resources thereby improving production of food grains but shall also help in socio-economic development & ecological development of the project areas.
9 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 2
2.0 Agro-climatic zones Briefly describe the agro-climatic zones of the States including the soil types, rainfall, major crops, etc.
The climate of Punjab is dominantly sub-tropical and monsoon type. The mean annual rainfall varies from about 1200 mm in Dhar block of Gurdaspur district (wettest) to less than 300mm at Abohar (driest). Soil moisture regimes are udic, ustic and aridic and soil temperature regime is hyperthermic. The extent of variabilities in agro- ecological regions, soil characteristics (e.g texture, soil fertility, etc), ground water behavior, drainage, flood prone areas, soli salinity/alkalinity, ground water quality, etc.
Based on soil and climatic parameters, the Punjab Agricultural University has divided Punjab into the following Agro Climatic regions:- 1. Sub Mountainous undulating region or Kandi region. 2. Undulating plain region. 3. Central plain region. 4. Western plain region. 5. Southern plain region. 6. Flood Plain/Bet Area.
10 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Sub Mountainous undulating region or Kandi region Kandi region as notified by Govt. of Punjab consists of all areas in Punjab lying to the east of Derabassi-Chandigarh- Ropar-Balachaur-Hoshiarpur-Mukerian road. Kandi region is spread over 22 blocks in 5 districts. The boundaries of development blocks are not coterminous with the boundaries of Kandi region. Most blocks contain both Kandi and non- kandi area. Entire Kandi area has been declared as backward area. As the unit of development is a block, this artificial demarcation creates some problems in the implementation of the programme. The total area of the Kandi region is not known precisely but the total area of the above blocks is estimated to be 5 lac hectares or about 10% of the total area of the state. Kandi area is one of the most backward area of the state. Most of the population depends on agriculture either as farmers or as agricultural labourers. The few industrial units established to take advantage of subsidies in backward areas are concentrated near Ropar and in few villages of Nawanshaher district. Most of the farmers have small (1-2 ha) or marginal land holdings. Literacy especially amongst the women is very low. Most of the adult males have been traditionally working as laborers in the town, particularly in grain markets. Out migration which was earlier temporary is now more of less permanent. Apart from agriculture and labour, other major sources of income are animal husbandry and sale of trees from cultivated areas and illegally from forest areas. Many poor people particularly ladies from both farming and landless labour families collect fuel wood from hills and store it at household level for sale. Sale of trees from cultivated areas is also at the village level to petty contractor. Most of the villages lack facilities of all whether roads, good schools and hospitals. The total normal rainfall of the Kandi region varies from about 800 to 1500 mm, about three fourths of which is received during rainy season in a few rainy days. The normal winter (November to March) rainfall is bout 170 mm. The minimum temperature in Dec-Jan may be close to freezing and the maximum during May-June to about 45 degrees.
11 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
12 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Undulating plain region In the Kandi region, undulating area just below the hills with 2-6% slope is used for raising crops mainly rainfed. Out of total rainfed area of 3.75 Lac hectare in 1994-95 about 75% or 2.81 lac hectares is in the Kandi area. The average annual rainfall of the area varies from 800mm to 1500mm with wide variations. About 80% of total rainfall is received in 3 months from mid June to mid September. The aberrations include late start of monsoon season and its early withdrawl, long dry spells within monsoon season and heavy showers received in a short period of 2-3 days. Open pan evaporation during the growth period varies from about 2mm/day in December-January to about 5mm in last week of March and first week of April. But in most of the years, maize fails because of lack of moisture at the time of maturity of crops and wheat cannot be sown for the same reason. The entire 1.0 lac hectares rainfed wheat and 0.75 lac hectares maize is grown in this region. Cultivated Plain Area: Irrigated agriculture with shallow tubewells as source of water is practiced. The problems are more or less the same as in Kandi choe related problems and other tubewell irrigated areas.
Central plain region Extent: This region of non Kandi area of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, Nawanshahar Roopnagar and Patiala districts, and whole area of Jalandhar, Kapurthala Ludhiana and Fatehgarh Sahib districts and most of Sangrur and Amritsar districts. The region constitute a little more than 50 per cent of the total area of the state. Rainfall and irrigation: The rainfall in the region varies from 500-800 mm and about 80 per cent of which is received in a short period 3 months (mid June to mid September). The region also receives lot of run off water from the Kandi area through a number of channels like White Bein and Black Bein in Jalandhar and Kapurthala districts, Patiala Ki Rao and Ghaggar in Patiala and Sangrur districts and number of Nalas originating in Kandi area of Gurdaspur and Amritsar districts. Even though the area is irrigated by upper Bari Doab canal in Gurdaspur and Amritsar districts, Bist Doab canal in Hoshiarpur Nawanshahar and Jalandhar districts, Sirhind Canal, Bhakra Main Canal in Ludhiana, Patiala and Sangrur 13 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
districts , however, except for Sangrur and Patiala districts the area irrigated by canals is very small. Major constraints of the region are declining water table and soil sodicity and salinity. Decline in water table: Directorate of water resources Punjab monitors the water levels at a large number of locations. Data from 228 selected observations well between June 1983 and June 1990 were analyzed by the scientists of the Punjab Agricultural University for 19 Agro Climatic zones, based on soils and canal system. Their conclusion is "The study further brought out that present normative demands are not met. If the normative demands are met the fall in water table will be much more. One may not agree with the methodology or absolute figures but it cannot be over looked that ground water in the sweet water zone is being over exploited and if this trend continues, it may prove disastrous for Punjab agriculture. Every effort should be made to halt this process and if possible reverse it." Sodic Soils Large area of land in the Semi- Arid central plains of Punjab was Affected sodicity commonly known as kallar. Most of these lands had been lying uncultivated for long where nothing grew. The technology for the improvement and reclamation of these soils was developed by the scientists of Central Soil Survey Research Institute Karnal and that for rainfed areas was developed by Scientists of Punjab Agriculture University which essentially consisted of (a) provision of a good quality ground water (b) and leveling (c) addition of gypsum (d) suitable cropping pattern and (e) appropriate agronomic practices. The Punjab Land Development Reclamation & Development Corporation in coordination with the Agriculture department took up the work of reclamation of sodic soil on a large scale in early eighties. As a result of these efforts 2 lac hectare area has been reclaimed.
Western plain region & Southern plain region Climate: South western plains region comprises of Mansa, Bhatinda, Faridkot and Ferozepur districts. The total area of the region is 17.14 lac hectares forming 35 per cent of the state. The rainfall varies from 260 mm in Abohar to 450 mm in Ferozepur. About 80 per cent of total rain is received in 3 months July to September but is not enough to meet evaporative demand of the crop. Rainfall is not only low but also highly risky. Average annual mean temperature is about
14 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
25 degree C with the lowest minimum close to freezing point in December- January and highest (above 40 degree C) in June. Ground Water: Most of the ground water in the region have moderate to high salinity and sodicity hazards and thus cannot be used for irrigation for prolonged periods. Irrigation: Successful agriculture in the region is possible without irrigation. Ground water is either not available or not suitable for irrigation because of high salinity or sodicity hazard. The only alternative is to provide canal irrigation. Sirhind canal was the first canal to be constructed for providing irrigation to this area. Water from this canal head works at Ropar on river Satluj was released in 1882. Now the region is being irrigated by following canal system. Sirhind Canal Sirhind Feeder Eastern Canal Out of total net irrigated area of 13.69 lac Hect. in the region in 1994-95, 9.66 lac hectare (71%) is irrigated by canals. About two third of the net irrigated area of canals in the state is in this region. In recent years there has been an increase in the tube well irrigated area, particularly in Ferozepur district where 46 per cent of total net area is irrigated by tube wells. Because of the serious water quality problem this would need careful monitoring. In this south-western plains region 88 per cent of total area is under cultivation. Cropping intensity in the region is 179 and of the total 27.75 lac hectares cropped area, 26.66 lac hectares or 96 per cent is irrigated.
Flood Plain/Beet Area An area of 10138 hectares in Punjab is Beet area falling under Hoshiarpur district. Rains are scanty and there are no definite sources of irrigation like canals, ponds etc. The groundwater table is normally very deep with tubewell bores running to a depth of more than 650 feet. Like submountaneous area, the land is undulating and soil is very deep. Main problem of bet area is the lack of water for irrigation and even for drinking purposes.
15 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table SPSP 2: Details of Agro-climatic zones in the State
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Major soil types Major crops Names of the Average rainfall in mm S. No Name of the Agro-climatic zone Area in Ha. b) Area in districts a)Type (preceding 5 years average) a)Name b)Area in Ha. Ha. Semi Arid 263570 Amritsar Sandy loam 222000 522.5 Rice 183000 1. to loam Wheat 187000 Sub Mountain Undulating Region 88562 Gurdaspur Sandy to 88562 1400 Wheat, 48709 Sandy Loam Maize, Paddy, Undulating Plain Region 137450 Vegetables, Clay Loam to 87836 Horticulture Fruit Sandy Loam, Plantation Central Plain Region 123616
1100
Sandy Loam to Clay Loam 49614 Wheat, 106467 Paddy,Basm 2. ati, Sugarcane, Sandy Loam Berseem, to Clay Loam Vegetables 123616
1100 Wheat, 101630 Paddy,Basm ati, Sugarcane,
Central Plane 241449 T.Tarn Loamy Sand, 241449 650 Paddy 166290 3. Loamy Clay Wheat 180000 Dry Sub humid 339800 Hoshiarpur Sandy loam 159905 900 Wheat 136771 4. Loamy sand 119929 Maize 60065 Rice 55272 Central Plain 167000 Kapurthala Centrail 167000 544 Wheat, 187653 5. Alluvial Plain Rice 165321 Central Plain 263000 Jalandhar Centrail 263000 703 Wheat, 162000 6. Alluvial Plain Rice 134000 Sub Mountain Undulating Region 25000 Nawanshaher sandy to 25000 900 Wheat 72000 sandy loam Rice 50000 Sugarcane 9000 Maize 17000 7. Clay Loam to Sunflower 15000 Undulating Plain Region Sandy Loam, Rapeseed & 15000 Sandy Loam Mustard 1000 to Clay Loam 15000 750 Sub Mountain Undulating Region 135728 Ropar Sandy loam 135728 935 Wheat 61139 8. to loamy Maize 20301 16 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
sand Rice 36231 Fodder 16823 Undulating Plain Region 101713 S.A.S. Nagar Sandy loam 101713 815 Wheat 51362 to loamy Maize 6378 9. sand Rice 30153 Fodder 21360 Central Alluvial Plain 329000 Patiala Clay 329000 571.8 Rice 234000 10. Wheat 240000 Central Alluvial plain 117000 Fatehgarh Clay 117000 403.4 Rice 84000 11. Sahib Wheat 85000 Central Alluvial Plain 368000 Ludhiana deep loamy 368000 680 Wheat 247677 alluvial Paddy 240270 12. Fodder 49807 Vegetables 8307 South western plain region 312000 Sangrur Sandy loam 312000 344 Wheat 283000 13. to loamy Paddy 262000 sand South western plain region 140965 Barnala Sandy loam 140965 342 Wheat 112000 to loamy Paddy 99000 14. sand, saline and Sodic South Westren Plain region 205895 Moga Sandy Loam 97000 277 Wheat 194350 15. Loamy Sand 108895 Paddy 167615
Northen-Arid Zone 526300 Ferozepur 237.98 Wheat 389000 16. Paddy 235000 Cotton 151000 South western plain region 146875 Faridkot Sandy Loam 84825 395.8 Paddy 90000 17. Loamy Sand 62650 Cotton 14000 Wheat 111000 Arid Irrigated Zone 263933 Muktsar Sandy loam 263933 380 Cotton 413702 18. Wheat Paddy Arid 336725 Bathinda Loamy sand 168362 333.8 Wheat 303052 19. Sandy 168363 Cotton 227289 Loamy Paddy 75763 Western Area( Plain) 216643 Mansa Sandyyto 216643 156.35 Wheat 169000 20. Sandy Loam Cotton 100000 Paddy 61000 Rice 2621000 Sub Mountainous undulating region or 257000 20 districts Wheat 3467000 Kandi region. 375000 Pulses 29000 Undulating plain region. 2680000 groundnut 4000 Central plain region. 1714000 Sunflower 15000 Western & Southern plain region. 10138 Oilseeds 70000 Flood Plain/Bet Area. Sugarcane 99000 Fruits 57000 Vegetables 110000
17 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
2.1 Rainfall
a) Brief description about rainfall in the State, months during which rainfall is received in the State, distribution of rainfall over the year with average rainfall per month, type of monsoon etc.
The mean annual rainfall is 705mm, which varies from 1200mm at Pathankot to less than 300 mm at Abohar, representing wettest and driest stations, respectively. The major part of rain fall occurs between the months of July and September, and is essential for growing Kharif crops and subsequent sowing of rabi crops. Hence the climate of the state is dominantly, semiarid and monsoonic type. The soils moisture regimes are udic, ustic and aridic and the soil temperature regime is mainly hyperthermic.
Table SPSP 3: Details of average rainfall and altitude recorded at the District headquarters
1 2 3 S.No. Name of the District Average rainfall in mm (preceding 5 years average) 1. Amritsar 432.2 2. Gurdaspur 917.6 3. Taran Taran 391.7 4. Hoshiarpur 576.2 5. Kapurthala 428.10 6. Jallandhar 552.5 7. Nawanshahar 630.2 8. Ropar 671.8 9. S.A.S. Nagar 376.7 10. Patiala 571.8 11. Fatehgarh Sahib 403.4 12. Ludhiana 375.7 13. Sangrur 344.9 14. Barnala 287.2 15. Moga 197.4 16. Ferozepur 171.0 17. Faridkot 462.9 18. Mukatsar 449.7 19. Bathinda 357.9 20. Mansa 155.0 STATE AVERAGE 438.0
18 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
b) A brief description of droughts and floods in the State in the last ten years.
Table SPSP 4: Details of drought and flood affected districts, blocks and villages in the State during last 10 years * (MIS Table-M(SP)6)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Periodicity Name of the Names of the Sl.No Particulars Villages Any other Not affected District Block Annual (pl.specify) Data Not Flood Data Not No.of villages Data Not Data Not Data Not Available Available Available Available Available
Name (s) of Data Not Data Not Data Not villages Available Available Available
Drought Data Not No.of villages Data Not Data Not Data Not Available Available Available Available
Name(s) Data Not Data Not Data Not of villages Available Available Available
19 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 3
3.0 Demography and land distribution – an overview
Growth in population during the last three census’ , per capita availability of land, sex ratio, population age group in the State, literacy level, migration, workforce available in different sectors of the economy, demography of SC,ST, BPL and landless families in the State in the last ten years, etc.
The Population during the last 3 Census' in the Year 1981, 1991 and 2001 was 1.68 Crores, 2.03 Crores and 2.44 Crores respectively marking a Growth of 45% in these 2 decades. The Average Size of Land Holding has been 4.03 Ha. and the Sex Ratio in 2001 was 876. As per 2001 Census, there were 1.30 Crore Males and 1.14 Crore Females in the state, out of which 0.32 Crores were Children in the Age Group (0-6). The Literacy rate has been 69.7% excluding the Children in the Age Group (0-6). The migration of population is small proportions is either to big cities or foreign shores. Out of total workforce of 91.27 Lakh, 20.65 Lakh are Cultivators, 14.90 Lakh are Agricultural Labourers and the remaining are in other Main & marginal industries. There are 12.55 Lakh SC, 0 ST, 0.93 Lakh BPL and 2.09 Lakh Landless families in the state.
3.1 Land reform measures – types of tenancies, distribution of ceiling surplus land, bhoodan land and wastelands among landless, prevention of alienation of tribal land, restoration of alienated land among tribals, women’s land rights, empowerment of PRIs, definition and proper categorization of common property resources etc.
There are 20.65 Lakh Cultivators (Land Owners) and 14.90 Lakh Agricultural Labourers (Tenants or Workers) in the state. At present, there is no Govt. policy to distribute ceiling surplus land, bhoodan land and wastelands among landless. There are no tribals in the state. Women have equal land rights to men as per the relevant GOI Act. The PRIs are involved in most of the Govt. schemes of Social, Agricultural & rural development. The ongoing watershed development programmes of NWDPRA & IWDP are being implemented through PRIs only. The Common Property Resource (CPR) may be defined as categorization of area under different land use/ land cover categories in different socio-cultural zones apart from Agriculture, residential of industrial uses. There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54 Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha. Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the state.
20 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
3.2 Operational land holdings in the State under different categories and income
a) Brief description about land holdings:
There are total 9.98 Lakh Operational Land Holdings in the state, out of which 0.72 Lakh (7.25%) are Large (>10 Ha.), 1.23 Lakh (12.31%) are Marginal (<1 Ha.) and the remaining 8.03 Lakh (80.46%) are Small (1-10 ha.) holdings.
Table-SPSP 5: Details of District-wise land holding pattern in the State * (MIS Table-M(SP)9)
1 2 3 4 5 6 S. Names of No. of No. of BPL Land holding (ha) Type of Farmer No. Districts households households Irrigated Rainfed Total i) Large 1901 25943 25943 ii) Small 16835 23317 23317 Amritsar 1. iii) Marginal 9184 5893 5893 iv) Landless Sub-total 27920 0 144051 0 144051 i) Large 2359 27719 4429 32148 ii) Small 69415 164198 40473 204671
Gurdaspur iii) Marginal 41434 13438 6459 19897 2. iv) Landless 174751 30551 0 Sub-total 287959 30551 205355 51361 256716 i) Large 1984 26528 26528 ii) Small 43682 23317 23317 3. Taran Taran iii) Marginal 9184 4097 4097 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 54850 0 53942 0 53942 i) Large 2000 0 17816 19184 37000 ii) Small 52000 0 83050 67950 151000 4. Hoshiarpur iii) Marginal 21000 3686 4200 7800 12000 iv) Landless 0 14750 0 0 0 Sub-total 75000 18436 105066 94934 200000 Kapurthala i) Large 2584 40826 40826 ii) Small 23640 80121 80121 5. iii) Marginal 4790 3112 3112 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 31014 0 124059 0 124059 6. Jallandhar i) Large 21015 158415 158415
21 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
ii) Small 29930 65131 65131 iii) Marginal 9205 5807 5807 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 60150 0 229353 0 229353 i) Large 8780 15 1 16 ii) Small 37144 25 4 29 7. Nawanshahar iii) Marginal 55416 34 5 39 iv) Landless 26341 4884 0 Sub-total 127681 4884 74 10 84 i) Large 6890 10 10 ii) Small 18965 16 3 19 8. Ropar iii) Marginal 45325 29 4 33 iv) Landless 16589 2758 0 Sub-total 87769 2758 55 7 62 i) Large 4956 9 9 ii) Small 15623 14 2 16 9. S.A.S. Nagar iii) Marginal 32571 21 6 27 iv) Landless 13548 1582 0 Sub-total 66698 1582 44 8 52 Patiala i) Large 5005 0 ii) Small 8737 0 10. iii) Marginal 4460 0 iv) Landless 60517 0 Sub-total 78719 0 0 0 0 Fatehgarh i) Large 1546 0 Sahib ii) Small 3799 0 11. iii) Marginal 12379 0 iv) Landless 22473 0 Sub-total 40197 0 0 0 0 Ludhiana i) Large 48483 48483 48483 ii) Small 14076 14076 14076 12. iii) Marginal 9819 9819 9819 iv) Landless 164165 0 Sub-total 236543 0 72378 0 72378 Sangrur i) Large 41910 132800 132800 ii) Small 49957 158400 158400 13. iii) Marginal 9014 28800 28800 iv) Landless 34975 0 Sub-total 100881 34975 320000 0 320000 14. Barnala i) Large 10409 94477 94477 22 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
ii) Small 10784 28445 28445 iii) Marginal 1346 1277 1277 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 22539 0 124199 0 124199 Moga i) Large 39156 183576 183576 ii) Small 7916 11314 11314 15. iii) Marginal 6270 3976 3976 iv) Landless 69809 0 Sub-total 123151 0 198866 0 198866 Ferozepur i) Large 63717 437527.3 437527.26 ii) Small 8741 11918 11918 16. iii) Marginal 2996 2112.55 2112.55 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 75454 0 451558 0 451557.81 Faridkot i) Large 21753 115285 115285 ii) Small 4611 6490 6490 17. iii) Marginal 3132 2003 2003 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 29496 0 123778 0 123778 Mukatsar i) Large 3526 8 8 ii) Small 13628 10 2 12 18. iii) Marginal 25148 19 1 20 iv) Landless 11255 1896 0 Sub-total 53557 1896 37 3 40 Bathinda i) Large 44078 277249 32042 309291 ii) Small 8262 11912 2000 13912 19. iii) Marginal 7632 4639 1000 5639 iv) Landless 37552 7800 0 Sub-total 97524 7800 293800 35042 328842 Mansa i) Large 1388 54878.89 54878.89 ii) Small 14288 130305.8 130305.77 20. iii) Marginal 1786 2929.57 2929.57 iv) Landless 0 Sub-total 17462 0 188114 0 188114.23 i) Large (2-10 ha) 686515 0 1641538.15 55656 1697194.15 ii) Small (1-2 ha) 183064 0 812019.77 110427 922446.77 GRAND TOTAL iii) Marginal (<1 ha) 133791 3686 92137.12 15264 107401.12 iv) Landless 555608 92960 0 0 0 Grand total 1558978 96646 3840653 181347 4022000
23 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table SPSP 6: Share of Agriculture Sector to State Income/National Income at Current Prices and Total Work Force in the State and India
1 2 3 Percentage share of Agriculture Percentage share of Agriculture in & allied (Primary) sector in Year Total Workforce NSDP@ figure State All India State All India 1999-2000 37.53 25.52 2000-01 35.89 24.69 38.95 60.00 2006-07 31.24 18.80
@NSDP: Net State Domestic Product
Table SPSP 7: Sectoral Composition of Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) in State.
Years Sector 1999-2000 2000-01 2005-06 2006-07 Agriculture and allied 37.53 35.89 30.72 31.24 (Primary) Sectors Industrial (secondary) 22.75 22.98 24.33 24.78 Sector Service (Tertiary) 39.72 41.13 44.95 43.98 Sector
24 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 4
4.0 Land Use Pattern
4.1 Brief description about land use planning and agriculture land in the state:
There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54 Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha. Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the state.
4.2 Mechanism in the State for land use conversion, establishment of Land Use Board in the State, conversion of agricultural land to other uses in the last five years, brief description of other uses to which agricultural land has been converted, extent to which area under wastelands has been reclaimed and the uses to which the reclaimed land has been put, etc.
At present, the Revenue department gives the permission for land use conversion in the state. A State Land Use Board was established under a GOI Scheme which has become redundant now due to scrapping of GOI scheme. The Net Sown Area has reduced from 42.50 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2000-01 to 41.84 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2006-07. The agricultural land is decreasing as it is being converted to residential & industrial land in the state. An area of 66157 Ha. of wasteland has been reclaimed and put to productive agriculture use.
25 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 8: Land Use status in the State (average of preceding 5 years)* (Area in 000 Ha.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Land Land under Total rainfed area Geogra under Perm- miscellan- Curre Net Net area Net irrig- Gross Forest Other Districts phical Non- b)cultiv anent eous tree nt sown sown more ated crop-ped Area a)cultiva fallow Area Agril able pastu-res crops and fallow area than once area area ted use waste groves Amritsar 267 10 31 1 222 202 222 424 Gurdaspur 356 37 21 288 224 237 512 Taran Taran 241 5 18 218 186 218 404 Hoshiarpur 340 108 28 1 201 154 172 355 Kapurthala 163 2 29 136 139 135 275 Jallandhar 266 6 21 239 179 239 418 Nawanshahar 119 16 11 1 2 95 83 87 178 Ropar 144 37 14 1 1 2 78 63 67 141 S.A.S. Nagar 111 18 15 75 44 75 119 Patiala 329 13 36 2 4 1 273 263 273 536
Fatehgarh 117 2 11 102 91 102 193 Sahib Ludhiana 368 10 52 1 305 275 305 580 Sangrur 361 5 38 1 2 315 309 315 624 Barnala 141 2 13 1 124 116 124 240 Moga 168 2 22 3 195 176 195 371 Ferozepur 585 12 38 476 397 474 873 Faridkot 144 2 17 128 126 128 254 Mukatsar 263 2 14 14 227 222 225 449 Bathinda 334 8 32 297 258 295 555 Mansa 219 3 14 7 190 170 190 360 5036 300 475 3 2 4 35 1 4184 3677 4078 7861 Grand Total
26 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
4.3 Irrigated areas
a) Brief description about irrigated area in the State – major sources of irrigation – effect of climate change on irrigation – increase or decrease in irrigated area in the last five years – effect on crop yields, productivity and change in cropping pattern.
Out of total 50.36 lakh Ha. of geographical area of Punjab, 41.84 Lakh Ha. (83%) is under cultivation. Out of which, 40.78 Lakh Ha. (97.5%) is irrigated. However, only 11.93 Lakh Ha. (28.5%) of cultivated area is irrigated by canals and the remaining 29.91 Lakh Ha. (71.5%) cultivated area depends upon rainfall and groundwater for irrigation. The uneven & erratic rainfall / climate over the years has lead to over-exploitation of the ground water resources of the state to the extent that 103 blocks out of total 141 blocks have been declared 'Over-exploited' and the ground water table is depleting at an average rate of 50cm annually. The Net Irrigated Area has marginally increased from 40.38 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2000-01 to 40.78 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2006-07. However, this change has been affected due to a rise in the no. of Tubewells to 12.32 Lakhs, higher drawl from underground water aquifers and the area irrigated by canals has in fact decreased during this period. From 2000-01 to 2006-07, there has been an increase in yield of Rice from 3506 kg/Ha to 3868 Kg/ha and decrease in the Yield of Wheat from 4563 kg/Ha to 4210 Kg/ha. During this period, the area under Rice has increased from 26.12 Lakh Ha to 26.21 Lakh Ha. and the area under Wheat has increased from 34.08 Lakh Ha to 34.67 Lakh Ha.
27 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 9: Irrigation Status (Area in 000 Ha.)*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gross# Net Gross@ Rainfed Net irrigated Net irrigated Districts cultivated cultivated irrigated % of net area % Area area area area cultivated area Amritsar 424 222 426.46 221.94 99.97 1.00 0.45 Gurdaspur 512 288 410.89 205.44 79.94 51.36 19.98 Taran Taran 404 218 384.54 217.54 99.79 0.00 Hoshiarpur 355 201 254.95 144.33 72.17 94.93 47.47 Kapurthala 275 136 277.00 135.00 100.00 0.00 Jallandhar 418 239 413.28 235.12 100.00 0.00 Nawanshahar 178 95 167.00 84.00 89.36 10.00 10.64 Ropar 141 78 106.00 62.00 80.52 16.00 20.78 S.A.S. Nagar 119 75 96.00 52.00 82.54 11.00 17.46 Patiala 536 273 531.70 531.70 99.38 0.00 Fatehgarh 192.50 192.50 100.00 0.00 193 102 Sahib Ludhiana 580 305 604.80 306.00 100.00 0.00 Sangrur 624 315 616.60 312.00 100.00 23.00 9.04 Barnala 240 124 125.00 125.00 100.00 0.00 Moga 371 195 194.34 194.34 94.39 0.00 Ferozepur 873 476 891.80 463.70 96.99 43.49 Faridkot 254 128 253.00 126.00 96.92 0.00 Mukatsar 449 227 437.57 218.79 90.07 0.00 Bathinda 555 297 328.84 293.80 89.34 35.05 10.66 Mansa 360 190 361.00 190.00 96.94 0.00 Grand Total 7861 4184 7657.4 4078.00 97.70 285.58 7.19
28 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 10: Source-wise Area Irrigated (Area in 000Ha.)*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Others (Pl. Canal Tanks Open wells Bore wells Lift irrigation Total Districts specify) (Area) No Area No Area No Area No Area No Area No Area Amritsar 54 67970 168 67970 222 Gurdaspur 56 45 60.00 137 0.03 51338 213 15 250.00 10 145.00 269 Taran Taran 115 87292 103 218 Hoshiarpur 21 0 0.00 524 0.01 20000 141 8 1438.00 2000.00 165 Kapurthala 0.5 20000 135 135 Jallandhar 4 40000 233 237 Nawanshaha 1.0 20885 83 5 0.02 20891 84 r Ropar 4 10000 74 78 S.A.S. Nagar 0 80000 49 50 Patiala 6 7000 265 271 Fatehgarh 11 3000 91 102 Sahib Ludhiana 10 294000 296 294000 306 Sangrur 19 92123 293 92123 312 Barnala 27 10000 97 124 Moga 3 83183 192 83 195 Ferozepur 161 30000 314 475 Faridkot 107 5000 17 124 Mukatsar 200 5000 24 224 Bathinda 215 29705 81 29705 296 Mansa 95 32689 95 32689 190 Grand Total 1109 45 60.00 661 0.04 1246000 2964 23 1688.00 15 2145.02 537461 4077
29 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
4.4. Common Property Resources (CPR):
Brief description about Common Property Resources in the State, laws regarding common property resources, access of landless to the CPRs, management and maintenance of CPRs, brief description of CPRs which have become inoperable due to non-maintenance, state assistance, if any, for development and maintenance of CPRs etc.
The Common Property Resource (CPR) may be defined as categorization of area under different land use/ land cover categories in different socio-cultural zones apart from Agriculture, residential of industrial uses. There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54 Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha. Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the state. The CPR is either under control of the Revenue department, Panchayats or Municipal Corporations etc. and the Revenue Department can transfer the same to other uses. The landless can work as labourers under different schemes on the CPR. Most of the CPR, barring Mountainous land, is operable and is put into diverse uses as described in the table below.
30 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 11: Details of Common Property Resources in the State *(MIS Table-M(SP)10)
1 2 3 4 5 Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha) Area owned/ In possession of S. Names of CPR Govt. Any other Govt. Any other No. Districts Particulars Pvt. Pvt. (Specify PRI (Pl. (specify PRI (Pl. persons persons deptt.) Specify) deptt.) Specify) 1. Amritsar Wasteland/ degraded land 191 177 191 177 Pastures Orchards 176 20 Village Woodlot Forest 9632 Village Ponds/ Tanks 438 Community Buildings 22598 Weekly Markets Permanent markets 150 Temples/ Places of 205 worship Others (Pl. specify) 2. Gurdaspur Wasteland/ degraded land 8400 4000 2600 425 100 Pastures Orchards 15 Village Woodlot Forest 33140 Village Ponds/ Tanks 150 1446 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets 32 Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify) 3. Taran Taran Wasteland/ degraded land 302 2630 2932 302 2630 Pastures 98 98 98 Orchards 554 Village Woodlot Forest 5176 5176 Village Ponds/ Tanks 504 504 Community Buildings 153 Weekly Markets
31 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets 20 Temples/ Places of 200 worship Others (Pl. specify)
4. Hoshiarpur Wasteland/ degraded land 9438 9438 Pastures Orchards 60 25 Village Woodlot Forest 54000 22400 11600 21000 16000 9600 Village Ponds/ Tanks 665 355 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
5. Kapurthala Wasteland/ degraded land 1650 Pastures Orchards 100 Village Woodlot Forest 200 Village Ponds/ Tanks 400 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
32 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
6. Jallandhar Wasteland/ degraded land 3100 Pastures Orchards 100 Village Woodlot Forest 700 Village Ponds/ Tanks 600 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
7. Nawanshahar Wasteland/ degraded land 8000 15000 5000 Pastures Orchards 900 100 Village Woodlot Forest 12000 Village Ponds/ Tanks 405 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
8. Ropar Wasteland/ degraded land 2000 4000 4000 2000 4000 4000 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot 33 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Forest 7000 13000 6000 2000 1000 1000 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
9. S.A.S. Nagar Wasteland/ degraded land 5000 1000 2000 5000 1000 2000 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 5000 10000 3000 2000 3000 2000 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
10. Patiala Wasteland/ degraded land 5000 3000 4000 3000 8000 9000 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets 34 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
11. Fatehgarh Wasteland/ degraded land 10000 8000 3000 8000 4000 3000 Sahib Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
12. Ludhiana Wasteland/ degraded land 3164 Pastures Orchards 1624 Village Woodlot 3215 Forest 10200 Village Ponds/ Tanks 2940 Community Buildings 791 2898 Weekly Markets 517 Permanent markets 132 Temples/ Places of 1146 worship Others (Pl. specify) 1
35 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
13. Sangrur Wasteland/ degraded land Pastures Orchards 2381 28 Village Woodlot Forest 5000 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1300 Community Buildings 340 Weekly Markets 70 Permanent markets 1700 Temples/ Places of 460 worship Others (Pl. specify) 41130
14. Barnala Wasteland/ degraded land 1640 Pastures 4500 Orchards 454 Village Woodlot 950 Forest 1701 Village Ponds/ Tanks 2910 Community Buildings 441 1900 Weekly Markets 400 Permanent markets 109 Temples/ Places of 60 worship Others (Pl. specify) 5236
15. Moga Wasteland/ degraded land Pastures Orchards 55 Village Woodlot 36 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Forest 2575 Village Ponds/ Tanks 563 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
16. Ferozepur Wasteland/ degraded land 8200 Pastures Orchards 2680 Village Woodlot Forest 233.22 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings 19279 Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)
17. Faridkot Wasteland/ degraded land Pastures Orchards 500 Village Woodlot Forest 200 Village Ponds/ Tanks 235 Community Buildings 260 Weekly Markets 37 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets 10 Temples/ Places of 639 worship Others (Pl. specify)
18. Mukatsar Wasteland/ degraded land Pastures Orchards 6162 Village Woodlot Forest 1722 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1022 Community Buildings 236 Weekly Markets Permanent markets 4 Temples/ Places of 520 worship Others (Pl. specify)
19. Bathinda Wasteland/ degraded land 6052 6052 Pastures Orchards 1630 1630 Village Woodlot Forest 6283 6283 Village Ponds/ Tanks 540 540 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets 9 Temples/ Places of 24 worship Others (Pl. specify) 20. Mansa Wasteland/ degraded land 3032 3032 38 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Pastures Orchards 869 869 Village Woodlot Forest 3125 3125 Village Ponds/ Tanks 368 368 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify) GRAND TOTAL Wasteland/ degraded land 52727 41249 32000 10532 28002 29245 18100 0 Pastures 0 4598 0 98 0 98 0 0 Orchards 18185 223 0 0 2499 25 0 0 Village Woodlot 0 4165 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forest 81475 121812 20600 0 25000 34584 12600 0 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1713 8092 3773 908 0 504 355 908 Community Buildings 20511 27889 496 0 0 0 0 0 Weekly Markets 0 987 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent markets 0 2157 0 9 0 0 0 0 Temples/ Places of worship 24 1871 1159 200 0 0 0 0 Others (Pl. specify) 0 46367 0 0 0 0 0 0
39 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 5
5.0 Trends in agriculture and food productivity
Brief description about agriculture and food productivity, major crops by cropping seasons, total food-grain production in the State, per capita availability of food-grains, comparison with national average, crops exported from the State and crops imported in the State, share of agriculture sector in State income/national income at current prices, total agriculture workforce in the State compared to national, changes in cropping patterns during the last five years, etc.
Rice & Maize are the major Kharif crops and Wheat is major Rabi crop in Punjab. Other major crops include Pulses, Oilseeds, cotton, sugarcane, Vegetables & fruits. In the Year 2006-07, the yield of Rice was 3868 Kg/ha and that of Wheat was 4210 Kg/ha. The area under Rice was 26.21 Lakh Ha. and that under Wheat was 34.67 Lakh Ha. The Production of Rice has been 101.38 Lakh Metric tons while that of Wheat has been 145.96 Lakh Metric tons in the Year 2006-07. The Per capita availability of food-grains is 1015.39 Kg as compared to National average figure of 156.64 kg (taking into account Rice & Wheat only). The State contributes 31.2% of rice and 75.3% of Wheat to the Central Pool. Rice worth 754.58 Crores was exported from the State in 2006-07. The share of agriculture & allied (Primary) sector in State income at current prices has been 31.24% as compared to 18.81% of the National figures. The Percentage share of Agriculture in Total Workforce in Punjab was 38.95% as per 2000-01 Census as compared to around 60% of National figure. From 2000-01 to 2006-07, the area under Rice has increased from 26.12 Lakh Ha to 26.21 Lakh Ha. and the area under Wheat has increased from 34.08 Lakh Ha to 34.67 Lakh Ha.
40 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 12: Crops production and productivity as per Agricultural Statistics, 2008 (MIS Table-M(PO)C1, C2 & C3 pre-project status)
1. 2 3 4 5 6 Sl. Kharif Rabi Zaid No. Average Names of the Name of Area Average Yield (Qtl) Area Total Area Average Yield Total production Total Production (Qtl) Yield per ha Districts crops (ha) per ha. (ha) production (qtl) (ha) per ha (qtl) (qtl) (qtl) Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. 1. Rice 123000 418000 2000 3.32 7000 Amritsar 33.98 Wheat 1.84 44.04 810000 250 17 425
2. Wheat 1700 639030 Gurdaspur 37.59 00 0 Paddy 170000 28.13 4782100 Maize 2000 41880 3. Taran Taran Paddy 171000 43 539 Wheat 38 8.19,00 -- - - -
0 Pulses 1.85 - - 1.9 11.4 - 1.00 Oil Seed - - 1.5 12.0 - 23.00 4. Maize 7822 18 140805 Hoshiarpur 5 0 Wheat 33036 15 495540 RICE 55272 28 1547616 5. Kapurthala Rice 114000 37.53 4348 ------Wheat 1110 4643 41.20 00 5. Jallandhar Rice 134000 32.5 4355000 ------Wheat 1620 748440 46.2 00 0 7. Nawanshahar Rice 49 16 2090000 Maize 10 13 480000 Sugarcan 9 470000 2400 e
Wheat 68 17 300000
0 8. WHEAT 5000 45 600000 Ropar 0 0 MAIZE 30000 1200000 40
41 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
RICE 33000 37 1220000 9. WHEAT 4000 45 180000 S.A.S. Nagar 0 0 MAIZE 2000 40 80000 RICE 29000 36 1030000 10 Patiala 23.4 ------17.0 11. 84.0 ------35 Fatehgarh Sahib 12. Ludhiana Paddy 247000 46.33 11440 ------Wheat -- -- 2580 12460 ------48.28 00 13. WHEAT 18340000 283 46.90 132727 Sangrur 70 RICE 262 00 14. WHEAT 99 112 47.07 535000 Barnala 47.72 RICE 4660000 0 15. Paddy 158945 6723373 ------Moga 42.30
Cotton 4794 7.12 33813 ------Wheat - - 1664 41.43 689444 ------12 9 200 7.5 - 1500 - 16. Paddy 235 - - - Cotton 151 948.0 - - wheat - - Barley - 14.36 110.15 389 40.79 - Ferozepur Gram - 5 - - - 13 33.57 1587.0 10.23 - 17.0 - 1.3 17. Faridkot 1)Paddy 95000 43.57 4140000 2)Cotton 21000 6.87 85000 bales 3) Moong 700 10.15 7000 4) wheat 1180 47.32 558000
00 0 18. paddy 97000 4.02 4234 kg 105000 lac meter per ha Cotton ton 758 kg Mukatsar 2000 4.68 lac per ha Desi bales 648 kg Cotton 8000 per ha bales 19. Wheat 3030 40 221.00 Bathinda 52 Cotton 227289 20 45.45 Paddy 75763 60 45.46 42 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
20. Cotton 100318 438 Bales
61096 7.45 Mansa Peddy 252 MT 169 41.29 Wheat 223 43.4 GRAND TOTAL Rice 2621000 38.68 101380000 Maize 154000 31.23 4810000 Wheat 3467 145960 42.10 000 000 Barley 1900 33.94 640000 0 Rapeseed 4100 11.1 & 460000 0 9 Mustard Sunflowe 1530 16.3 251000 r 0 9 Sugarcan 9900 60.8 6020000 e 0 3 Potato 7560 170. 1352500
0 30 0 Cotton 6000 7.63 45780 00
43 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 13: A. comparative average yield of major crops of the State and India during Triennia 1972-73 to 1974 -75 and 1992-93 to 1994-95 (in Kg/Ha.)
1 2 3 4 Major Crop/crop Period I: 1970-71 Period II: 1990-91 Period III: Post 2000-01 group State India State India State India Rice 1765 3229 3506 2102 Maize 1555 1786 2793 1938 Wheat 2238 3715 4563 2619 Barley 1022 2754 3393 1938 Rapeseed & Mustard - 1003 1218 Sunflower - 1531 1154 Sugarcane 4117 5941 6425 6691 Potato 12752 19863 19563 17058 Cotton 399 481 437 362
5.1 Give a brief description of types, area covered, production/productivity, marketing facilities and income per ha. from cash crops grown in the State Apart from foodgrains, Punjab produces a number of Cash crops like Pulses, groundnut, Sunflower, Oilseeds, Sugarcane, Fruits & Vegetables covering area of 0.29 Lakh Ha, 0.04 Lakh Ha, 0.15 Lakh Ha, 0.70 Lakh Ha, 0.99 Lakh Ha, 0.57 Lakh Ha & 1.10 Lakh Ha respectively. The Production of these Cash crops in 2006-07 has been Pulses- 0.24 Lakh Metric tons, groundnut- 0.04 Lakh Metric tons, Sunflower- 0.25 Lakh Metric tons, Oilseeds- 0.78 Lakh Metric tons, Sugarcane- 6.02 Lakh Metric tons and Fruits- 8.31 Lakh Metric tons. Major Fruit crops include Kinnow, Guava, Mangoes, Ber & Pear. Major vegetables include Potato & Onion. There are 145 regulated markets attached with 294 sub-yards in the state for marketing. The Gross Income Per Hectare of Cash crops varies from Rs. 1.25 Lakhs to 2.00 Lakhs.
44 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 6
6.0 Implementation of watershed programmes in the State at present a) Brief description about administrative structure for implementing watershed programmes in the State. At present, National Watershed Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) & Flood Prone River- Ghaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP) schemes of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and the Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) are being implemented in 12 districts of the state. The present Administrative set-up in NWDPRA & FPR-RVP schemes involves the MoA at the GOI level, State level Steering Committee (SLSC) under the chairmanship of Financial Commissioner Development and the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as the Nodal Office at the State level and the district level officers of the department as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The present Administrative set-up in IWDP scheme involves the MoRD at the GOI level, State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Joint Development Commissioner at the State Level, District level Additional Deputy Commissioners as Nodal officers and the district level officers of the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The new Common Watershed Development guidelines of GOI shall be applicable to all new watershed development programmes in the state.
b) Area covered under watershed programmes in the State
Under NWDPRA & FPR-RVP, 97 Micro-watersheds have already been taken up covering an area of 1.30 lakh Ha. Under IWDP, 76 Micro-watersheds have been started covering an area of 0.66 Lakh Ha. These Projects have been formulated based on the local problems of soil & water in the project area. 3 more IWDP projects are being proposed covering 0.35 Lakh Ha. in 3 districts.
45 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 14: Status of District-wise area covered under the watershed programme (ha) * (MIS Table-M(SP)2)
1 2 3 4 5 Micro-watersheds covered so far Total micro- Dept. of Land Resources Other Ministries/ Depts. Net watersheds to be watersheds in the Total watersheds S. Pre-IWMP projects (DPAP +DDP covered Names of Districts District Any other watershed project covered No. +IWDP) Area Area No. Area (ha.) No. Area (ha.) No. No. Area (ha.) (ha.) No. (ha.) 1. Amritsar 2. Gurdaspur 16 75810 3 13678 12 60343 15 74021 1 1789 3. Taran Taran 11 38000 1 3000 2 3463 3 6463 8 31537 4. Hoshiarpur 38 175353 2 9285 15 23929 17 33214 21 142139 5. Kapurthala 0 0 0 0 6. Jallandhar 0 0 0 0 7. Nawanshahar 12 50000 2 8632 3 12454 5 21086 7 28914 8. Ropar 29 86510 1 5252 19 25000 20 30252 9 56258 9. S.A.S. Nagar 11 73259 1 4245 4 15000 5 19245 6 54014 10. Patiala 3 13000 1 5000 1 5000 2 8000 11 Fatehgarh 0 0 0 0 Sahib 12 Ludhiana 0 0 0 0 13 Sangrur 1 3700 1 3700 1 3700 0 0 14 Barnala 0 0 0 0 15 Moga 0 0 0 0 16 Ferozepur 10 8200 1 1525 1 1525 9 6675 17 Faridkot 1 3040 1 3040 1 3040 0 0 18 Mukatsar 1 5787 1 5787 1 5787 0 0 19 Bathinda 0 0 0 0 20 Mansa 1 3349 1 3349 1 3349 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 134 536008 16 66157 55 140189 71 206682 63 329326
46 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 15: Details regarding the watershed projects sanctioned by DoLR in the State:
1 2 3 4 Pre-IWMP scheme details S.No. Item Total DPAP DDP IWDP 1 Area sanctioned in ha. (as per column 4 of DoLR 66157 area in ha. Table SSP 14) 2 Names of the districts covered Hoshiarpur, Sangrur,Gurdaspur, Taran Taran, Ferozepur, Faridkot, Mansa, Amritsar, Muktsar 3 No.of Blocks covered 4 No.of watershed projects sanctioned by DoLR 16 5 No. of projects completed out of those taken at none Row (4) 6 No.of projects foreclosed of Row (4) nil 7 No.of on-going projects of Row (4) 16 8 Area already treated by completed projects of none Row (5) 9 Area for treatment by on-going projects of Row 66157 (5) 10 Total area treated and under treatment (8)+ (9) 52487 11 Area yet to be treated and proposed to be 38000 treated by DoLR (column 1-column 10)
47 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 16: Details of the watershed projects implemented in the State with the financial assistance other than DoLR
1 2 3 4 Watershed schemes of other Ministries S.N #Others Item Total Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Planning NABA State EA o (Pl. GoI E & F, GoI Commission RD Govt. P Specify) 1 Area sanctioned in ha. (as per column 140189 4 of Table 14) 2 Names of the districts covered Mohali, Ropar, Nawanshaher, Hoshiarpur, Gurdaspur 3 No.of Blocks covered 4 No.of watershed projects sanctioned 55 other than DoLR 5 No.of projects completed out of those 37 taken at Row (4) 6 No. of projects foreclosed of Row (4) - 7 No.of on-going projects of Row (4) 18 8 Area already treated by completed 70019 projects of Row (5) 9 Area for treatment by on-going 26881 projects of Row (5) 10 Total area treated and under 96900 treatment (8)+ (9) 11 Area yet to be treated and proposed 397811 to be treated by other than DoLR resources (column 1-column 10)
48 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
6.1 Details of pending utilization certificates and unspent balance. Kindly refer Table- SPSP 17 below.
Table- SPSP 17 : Details of pending UCs (MIS Table-M(FM)5)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Reasons for Submission of Date of submission Financial Amount Amount not Pending UCs Instal- UC of UC S. year of released utilized submitting/ District Project ment No. release of (Rs. in (Rs.in Amount Amount delayed Amount no. Due fund lakh) lakhs) (Rs. In Date (Rs. In submission of Period (Rs. in date lakhs) lakhs) UC lakhs) 1. Amritsar Nil 2. IWDP-I 7 th 2008-09 16.34 16.34 IWDP- 3rd 2008-09 82.11 52.92 Gurdaspur II IWDP- 3rd 2008-09 81.94 40.76 III 3. IWDP 1st 04-05 27.00 23.67 31-3- 23.67 21-2- 23.67 Submitted in - - 06 06 time TDET 2nd 07-08 80.32 80.32 31-3- 80.32 31-3- 80.32 --do-- - - 08 09 Harike - 07-08 54.43 54.43 31-3- 54.43 31- 54.43 --do-- Taran Taran Wetlan 08 12- d 08s (Ministr y of F & E) 4. Mahilp 3rd 2008-09 101.05 41.65 UC to be 2008- 101.05 ur (Oct./08) submitted 09& along with the 2009-10 case for 4th Installment Hoshiarpur Hazipu 2nd 2008-09 54.14 14.25 UC to be 2008- 54.14 r (Oct./08) submitted 09& along with the 2009-10 case for 3rd Installment
49 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
5. Kapurthala Nil 6. Jallandhar Nil 7. Iwdp 3 2009-10 78.81 - Instalment Nawanshah sanctioned in ar August 2009 8. Ropar Nil 9. S.A.S. Nil Nagar 10. Patiala Nil 11 Nil Fatehgarh Sahib 12 Ludhiana Nil 13 IWDP 2nd 2006-07 99.90 71.52 Funds could 1 61.05 Le not be utilized Sangrur because of Hragag elections a 14 Barnala 15 Moga Nil 16 IWDP 1 05-06 12.58 11.62 - - 7-8- 7.58 - 08-09 6.14 (GOI) 2007 1.14 Ferozepur (state share) 2 08-09 24.54 4.76 ------17 I.W.D. 1st 2006-07 27.36 15.70 1 No. Faridkot P. 18 IWDP Ist 2001-02 52.08 41.20 10.88 Mukatsar 2nd 2005-06 49.14 44.38 4.76 total 101.22 85.58 15.64 19 Bathinda Nil 20 Mansa Nil
50 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 18: Details of Unspent balance (MIS Table-M(FM)8)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last released Financial year of Total Amount Total Amount S. Unutilised funds District Project Installment release of last released (Rs. in utilized No. (Rs. In lakhs) no. fund lakh) (Rs.in lakhs) 1. Amritsar nil 2. IWDP-I 4th 2006-07 188.52 172.71 15.81 Gurdaspur IWDP-II 3rd 2007-08 217.50 189.66 27.84 IWDP-III 3rd 2007-08 217.50 176.32 41.18 3. Taran Taran IWDP 1st 2004-05 27.00 23.67 3.33 4. Mahilpur 3rd 2008-09 277.36 208.92 68.44 Hoshiarpur Hazipur 2nd 2008-09 85.53 47.56 37.97 5. Kapurthala nil 6. Jallandhar nil 7. Nawanshahar Balachaur 2 2006-07 141.49 141.49 0.00 Saroya 2 2007-08 97.78 97.78 0.00 8. Ropar Budhkirao 4 2007-08 182.75 139.60 43.15 9. S.A.S. Nagar Iwdp 1 2006-07 38.20 29.54 8.66 10. Patiala Iwdp 1 2005-06 45.00 45.00 0.00 11 Fatehgarh Sahib nil 12 Ludhiana nil 13 Sangrur Lehragaga 2nd 2007-08 99.90 73.33 26.57 14 Barnala nil 15 Moga nil 16 Ferozepur IWDP 1 2008-09 38.26 15.76 22.50 17 Faridkot IWDP 1 2008-09 25.08 18.72 6.36 18 Mukatsar IWDP 2 2006-07 101.22 76.03 25.19 19 Bathinda nil 20 Mansa IWDP 1 2003-04 20.63 20.63 0.00 1803.72 1476.72 327.00
51 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 7
7.0 Strategy for implementation of Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP)
Briefly describe the following: a) Prioritization of available area based on the criteria as per the Operational Guidelines of DoLR The area has been prioritized for treatment after following the DoLR Guidelines. Area & treatment has been suggested keeping in view the local problems of the project area.
b) List of watershed projects, along with area coverage, selected for treatment for the next 18 years; listing of these watershed projects and area coverage year-wise for next 18 years Details given in Table-SPSP 19 below.
52 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 19: Plan-wise phasing of physical (area in ha) & financial (Rs. in Crore) targets of IWMP for next 18 years*:
Remaining period of XII Plan XIII Plan XIV Plan
XI Plan (2012-13 to (2017-18 to (2022-23 to Total for 18 years District (2009-10 to 2011-12) 2016-17) 2021-22) 2026-27) S.No Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1789 2.15 1 Gurdaspur 1789 2.15 76101 91.2 2 Hoshiarpur 19501 23.40 16500 19.80 19600 23.40 20500 24.60 23120 29.02 3 Ropar 14120 16.94 9000 12.08 5000 6.00 4 Amritsar 3000 3.60 2000 2.40 5000 6.00 5 Patiala 3000 3.60 2000 2.40 6000 7.20 6 Sangrur 4000 4.80 2000 2.40 6000 7.20 7 Jalandhar 2000 2.40 2000 2.40 2000 2.40 GRAND TOTAL 35410 42.49 30500 37.88 30600 36.6 26500 31.8 123010 148.77
53 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 20: Year-wise phasing of physical (area in ’000 ha) & financial (Rs. in lakh) targets of IWMP for remaining period of XI Plan *:
1 2 3 Remaining period of XI Plan 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. S. No. of No. of No. of No. of District Area Area Area Area No projects projects projects projects
H&D O H&D O H&D O H&D O H&D O H&D O H&D O H&D O
500 50 41 1 Ropar 0 8 0 6 0 8 00 6 8 20 4.94 8 14120 1694
Gurdasp 214. 2 1 447 1 895 1 447 1 1789 93 ur Hoshiar 3 6 4875 5.85 6 9751 11.7 6 4875 5.85 6 19501 2340 pur 500 11.8 1064 50 41 4248 Grand Total 7 8 5322 0 5 7 8 6 00 17.7 7 8 5322 20 10.79 7 8 35410 0 .93
H&D- Hilly & Difficult area; O- Others
54 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 21: Details of district wise and category-wise area proposed to be taken up under IWMP during next 3 years i.e upto 11th Five Year Plan. (Area in 000 Ha.) 7 1 2 3 4 5 6
Total area Total area Terrain of the proposed area Land use type of proposed area available proposed to take Others S. No. District Year Hilly Desert cultivated Uncultivated for up under IWMP in (Pl. rainfed area Wasteland treatment the next 3 years specify) 1. Ropar 2009-10 5000 5000 5000 2100 600 2010-11 5000 5000 5000 2100 600 2011-12 4120 4120 4120 1935 578 Sub-total 14120 14120 14120 6135 1778 2. Gurdasp 2009-10 447 447 447 ur 2010-11 895 895 895 2011-12 447 447 447 Sub-total 1789 1789 1789 880 634 3. Hoshiar 2009-10 4875 4875 4875 1731 945 pur 2010-11 9751 9751 9751 3462 1891 2011-12 4875 4875 4875 1731 945 Sub-total 19501 19501 19501 6924 3781 GRAND TOTAL 2009-10 10322 10322 9875 0 447 3831 1545
2010-11 15646 15646 14751 0 895 5562 2491
2011-12 9442 9442 8995 0 447 3666 1523
Sub-total 35410 35410 33621 0 1789 13939 6193
55 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 21 (Conti.) : Details of district wise and category-wise area proposed to be taken up under IWMP during next 3 years i.e upto 11th Five Year Plan.
7 8 9 Identified DPAP/ DDP Blocks Ownership pattern of the proposed area No. of beneficiaries covered covered Others DPAP DDP Commu- Total Private Forest (pl. MF SF LF Landless Total No. of No. of nity area Area Area specify) blocks blocks 2541 6050 5529 0 14120 12 10 15 1700 1948 0 0 0 0 5 8
1551 227 11 1789 20 11 25 783 1130 8 4 ………… ………Nil ………… ……….
4524 6983 7994 0 19501 21 55 22 3624 11459 0 0 0 0 15 00 0
56 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
C) Briefly describe the convergence of IWMP with other Schemes in the State
No targets have been fixed for convergence. However, need-based convergence with NREGS may be carried out during the course of the project implementation.
Table-SPSP 22: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes* (MIS Table-M(P)3)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Names of Was this fund Funds to be Departments included in Level at Name made Name of S. with Rs.12,000/15,000 which of the available to activity/task/structure per ha. decision for No. Schemes IWMP due to to be undertaken District convergence converging convergence with converged funds Yes No was taken$ with IWMP (Rs.)
nil Nil nil nil nil nil nil
d) Public – Private Partnership
Briefly describe scope for Public – Private Partnership in watershed projects
No for Public – Private Partnership is carried out in the watershed projects. However, the treatment on private lands of project area inhabitants is done on sharing basis depending upon the type of activity wherein nominal share is taken from beneficiary.
57 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 23: Summary of Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* (MIS Table-M(P)4)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Type of agreement Name of Private S. signed Financial Partnership District Sector Partner Expected Outcomes No. (MoU/contract contribution Interventions Agency others pl.specify) nil nil nil nil nil nil
7.1 Planning Process - Details of Scientific criteria/Inputs used in Planning (MIS Table-M(P)6)
Briefly describe about various scientific inputs used in planning watershed projects in the State.
Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether the desired criteria followed? (A) Planning Cluster approach Yes. Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been No. arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute. Baseline survey Yes. Hydro-geological survey Yes. Contour mapping Yes. Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes. Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes. Ridge to Valley treatment Yes. Online IT connectivity between (1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes. 58 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes. (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes. Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes. 2. Village boundaries Yes. 3. Drainage Yes. 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes. 5. Land use Yes. 6. Ground water status Yes. 7. Watershed boundaries Yes. 8. Activity Yes. Crop simulation models# No. Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible No. spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No. Weather Stations Yes. (B) Inputs 1. Bio-pesticides No. 2. Organic manures Yes. 3. Vermicompost Yes. 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes. 5. Water saving devices Yes. 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes. 7. Bio-fencing No. 8. Nutrient budgeting No. 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No. Any other (please specify) NA
59 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 8
8.0 Livelihood concerns:
(a) Brief description about the livelihoods in the State-traditional livelihoods-reasons for development of traditional livelihoods-other raw materials and potential available in the State – livelihoods that can be developed on the basis of these raw materials and potential-reasons for not developing these livelihoods so far-factors necessary for developing these livelihoods-potential in rural areas and potential in urban areas-backward-forward linkages available and yet to be created-facilities for capacity building available and yet to be created-workforce available in the State by age group- per capita income in the State and comparison with national average – likely per capita income to be generated through enhancement of livelihoods etc.
Given in Table- SPSP 24:(A) below.
60 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table- SPSP 24:(A) Details of livelihoods created for landless people*(MIS Table-M(PO)D2:(i))
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No. of beneficiaries Pre-project Expected change in Funds required Sources of funding (Rs.) S. District Name of activity Oth Wom Tot income income from project for the activity Project Benefi- Financial No. SC ST NGO Others ers en al (Rs.) intervention (Rs.) Fund ciary institution Post Harvesting 35 12 968000 100000 0 0 850 Nil 100% 10680000 0 0 0 Techniques 0 00 0 0 1 Ropar 55 85 656500 100000 Small enterprises 0 0 300 Nil 100% 7565000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washing Powder 12 20 32 Nil 100% 120000 10000 10000
Gurdas 100% 2 Sauces & Pickles 20 20 Nil 225000 15000 10000 pur Cutting & 20 20 Nil 100% 150000 40000 10000 Tailoring Post Harvesting 67 20 842700 0 0 1350 Nil 100% 9327000 900000 0 0 0 Techniques 5 75 0 Hoshiar 3 Small enterprises pur 10 15 561300 like Bee Keeping 0 0 459 Nil 100% 6313000 700000 0 0 0 90 49 0 and Vermi culture
61 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 25: (B) Details of other livelihoods created for farmers*(MIS Table- M(PO)D2:(ii))
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No. of beneficiaries Funds Sources of funding (Rs.) Name Pre-project Expected change in S. required for District of income income from project Projec Benefi- Financial No. SF MF LF Other Total the activity NGO Others activity (Rs.) intervention t Fund ciary institution (Rs.) Bee Keepin 10 15 25 17000/ Ha 25000/ Ha 30000 20000 10000 g Gurdas 1 Mushro pur om 15 15 17500/ Ha 30000/ Ha 25000 15000 10000 Cultivat ion Mushro om 40 20 12500/hact 32750 25 625 20000 / hact 4125000 850000 Cultivat 0 0 are 00 ion Bee Hoshiar 20 10 14630 2 Keepin 25 325 -- do -- -- do -- 1863000 400000 pur 0 0 00 g Vermin 20 10 16140 50 350 -- do -- -- do -- 2214000 600000 Culture 0 0 00 Dairy / 15 30100 75 25 250 -- do -- -- do -- 3760000 750000 Poltary 0 00
62 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 9 9.0 Institutional arrangements
Briefly describe the Institutional arrangements for implementation of IWMP in the State at various levels
At present, National Watershed Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) & Flood Prone River- Ghaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP) schemes of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and the Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) are being implemented in 12 districts of the state. The present Administrative set-up in NWDPRA & FPR-RVP schemes involves the MoA at the GOI level, State level Steering Committee (SLSC) under the chairmanship of Financial Commissioner Development and the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as the Nodal Office at the State level and the district level officers of the department as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The present Administrative set-up in IWDP scheme involves the MoRD at the GOI level, State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Joint Development Commissioner at the State Level, District level Additional Deputy Commissioners as Nodal officers and the district level officers of the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The new Common Watershed Development guidelines of GOI shall be applicable to all new watershed development programmes in the state.
9.1 SLNA Briefly describe organizational structure of SLNA (total no. of persons working, no. of permanent employees, no. of persons on contract basis, no. of persons paid from DoLR grants under IWMP, other sources of funds)
A dedicated State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) (Department ) is constituted by the State Government vide notification no.7647 dt. 27-10-2008 as per common guidelines of Watershed Development Programme as per the following:
63 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Financial Commissioner, Rural Dev. & Panchayats Chairman
Financial Commissioner Development or Representative Member
Rep. of GOI Water Resources Deptt., Rural Dev. Ministry Member
Dr. A.K. Sikka, Technical Expert (WD), NRAA Member
Rep. of GOI Ministry of Agriculture Member
Rep. of NABARD Member
Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab Member
Joint Development Commissioner (IRDP), Punjab Member
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Punjab Member
Chief Conservator of Soils, Punjab Member
Director, Animal Husbandry Deptt., Punjab Member
Director, Water Resources, Punjab Member
Head, Deptt. of Soil & Water Engg., PAU, Ludhiana Member
Rep. of NGO SPACE Member
Chief Executive Officer/ SLNA Member Secretary
The main functions of the SLNA will be to:
64 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
a. Prepare a perspective and strategic plan of watershed development for the state on the basis of plans prepared at the block and district level and indicate implementation strategy and expected outputs/outcomes, financial outlays and approach the Nodal Agency at the central level in the Department for appraisal and clearance. b. Establish and maintain a state level data cell from the funds sanctioned to the States, and connect it online with the National Level
Data Centre. c. Provide technical support to District Watershed Development Units (DWDU) throughout the state. d. Approve a list of independent institutions for capacity building of various stakeholders within the state and work out the overall capacity building strategy in consultation with NRAA/Nodal Ministry. e. Approve Project Implementing Agencies identified/selected by DWDU/ District Level Committee by adopting appropriate objective selection criteria and transparent systems. f. Establish monitoring, evaluation and learning systems at various levels (Internal and external/ independent systems). g. Ensure regular and quality on-line monitoring of watershed projects in the state in association with Nodal Agency at the central level and securing feedback by developing partnerships with independent and capable agencies. h. Constitute a panel of Independent Institutional Evaluators for all watershed projects within the state, get this panel duly approved by the concerned Nodal Agencies at the central level and ensure that quality evaluations take place on a regular basis. i. Prepare State Specific Process Guidelines, Technology Manuals etc in coordination with the Nodal Ministry/ NRAA and operationalise the same.
The Funding support for the State Level Nodal Agency and the state level data cell will come primarily from the budget of the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development after suitable review of the existing staff and infrastructure already available and actual requirement. It may also receive support from other Institutes and Agencies both national and international, corporate entities, and such other organisations which seek to support programmes on watershed mode. Each State Level Nodal Agency and state level data cell will be provided with an initial capital grant to
65 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
meet establishment costs and a recurring grant per annum to meet its annual expenses. The actual amount would depend upon the level of staff and infrastructure already available and the actual requirement. Till such time, SLNA is set up, the existing arrangement regarding sanctioning of project and flow of fund will be continued. However, all out efforts should be made by the States to set up SLNAs within a period of 6 months.
Table-SPSP 26: Details of SLNA (MIS Table-M(IS)1)
1 2 3 4 5 Total no. of S. Date of MoU Date of Notification Type of SLNA# members of No. with DoLR SLNA 1. 27/10/2008 15
Table-SPSP 27: Details of SLNA (MIS Table-M(IS)1) (Contd..)
6 7 Chairperson CEO Tenure Date of Nature of Contact Ph. No./ Name Designation# Name Designation (No. of Appointment appointment $ Fax/ E-mail years) Financial Commission Dr. S. Joint Sh. J. S. Rural Krana Development 27-10-08 Deputation NA 0172-2700920 Sandhu Development Raju Commissioner & Panchyats
66 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 28: Details of functionaries in the SLNAs* (MIS Table-M(IS)2) 1 2 3 4 Monthly Details of the persons engaged in the SLNA funded by DoLR Total no. emoluments S. of persons of all the Nature Contact Subject Date of Tenure N working in persons Names & Monthly of Ph. No./ of Qualifi Rol Appoint (No. of Experience o. the SLNA working in Designation remuneration appoint- Fax/ Expertis -cation e for IWMP the SLNA ment $ years) ment E-mail e for IWMP N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Table-SPSP 29 : Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) functionaries*# (MIS Table-M(IS)3) 1 2 3 4 Details of the persons engaged in the SLDC to be funded by DoLR Monthly Total no. emoluments Tenur of persons of all the Contact S. e working in persons Date of Nature of No. Names & Monthly re (No. Ph. No./ Qualifi- the SLDC working in Appoint appoint- Experience Role Designation muneration $ of Fax/ E- cation for IWMP the SLDC ment ment years mail for IWMP ) 1 2 0172- Er. Gulpreet Soil 9 Years 2001 Govt. regul 2777094; B.Tech( 9 Monit Singh Conservatio Officer ar 2725330, Agri. oring Aulakh n Officer dswcpunj Engg) Er. Baljinder do- 7 Years 2002 -do- -do- ab@gmai -do- 8 Plan Singh l.com ning
67 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Briefly describe State level Monitoring/Evaluation Cell Financial Commission Rural Development & Panchyats, Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab and Chief Conservator of Soils, Punjab alongwith their offices shall be responsible for state Level Monitoring/Evaluation
9.2. District Level Watershed Units
A) Briefly describe organizational structure of DRDA/ZP cell for watershed programme (total no.of persons working, no.of permanent employees, no. of persons on contract basis, no.of persons paid from DoLR grants under IWMP, other sources of funds)
Please find the details in Table-SPSP 30 below.
Table-SPSP 30: Details of functionaries in the DWDU/ DRDA Watershed Cell*(MIS Table-M(IS)4)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total no. Monthly Name of Details of the two personnel engaged in the Watershed Cell funded by DoLR Date of of emolument Name the Status of S. signing of persons s of all Name Contact of the executin Chairma Monthly Date of Nature of Tenure No. MoU with working persons and Ph. No./ Qualifi- Experi District g n@ Remun Appoint- appoint- (No. of Role SLNA for working for Desig $ Fax/ e- cation ence Agency# eration ment ment years) IWMP IWMP nation mail 1 Ropar DRDA CEO ZP 1 Govt. Harin Govt. Gradu 20 Moni Employee der Employ ate years torin Singh ee g APO
68 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
2 Gurdas Divisiona 2 Govt.Empl Sh. Govt.E Monitori NA Gradu 30 Moni pur l Soil oyee Anga mploye ng ate torin Conserv CEO, d e g ation Zilaparis Shar Officer, had ma Gurdasp ur Govt. Sh. Govt. Monitori N NA Gradu 20 M Employee Nirma Employ ng ate
l ee Singh 3 Hoshia DRDA CEO ZP 2 Govt. B.K. Govt. 27-10- Gradu 10 Moni rpur Employee Shar Employ 2008 ate years torin ma, ee g APO (M) Balvir Govt. 27-10- - do- 8 Moni Singh Employ 2008 years torin , ee g Invest igator
Similar structure, as above, is followed in all districts.
69 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
B) Eligible districts (more than 25,000 ha area under watershed projects in the district) for strengthening DRDA cell may be given.
Hoshiarpur, Gurdaspur and Ropar
9.3 PIA
The PIA for the state of Punjab has been identified as Department of Soil and Water Conservation Punjab
9.4 WDT
Watershed development team comprises of Team Leader as the Soil Conservation Officer( Soil And Water Conservation Department) and the team members are Horticulture Development Officer(Horticulture Department), Agriculture Development Officer(department of Agriculture Punjab), Veterinary officer, representative of KVK
9.5 Institutional arrangements at village level and people’s participation
The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small and marginal farmer households, landless/asset less poor agricultural labourers, women, shepherds and SC/STpersons. These Groups shall be homogenous groups having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed area for their livelihood. Each Self Help Group will be provided with a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by the Nodal Ministry.
70 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
10 User Groups The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in thewatershed area with the help of WDT. These shall be homogenous groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the watershed areas. Each User Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or activity.
The Watershed Committee (WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups based on the principles of equity and sustainability. These agreements must be worked out before the concerned work is undertaken. It must be regarded as a pre-condition for that activity. The User Groups will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of all the assets created under the project in close collaboration with the Gram Panchayat and the Gram Sabha.
71 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 10 10.0 Capacity building
a) Stake holders and capacity building requirements
S.No Project Stakeholder Critical capacity gaps 1 Target community Critical capacity gaps
2 GPs 3 Watershed Committees Awareness among the members regarding the project, participation and management 4 SHGs Awareness among the members regarding the project, participation and management 5 UGs Importance of SHG, working and sustainability 6 WDTs Participation, management and maintenance of the assets created. 7 PIAs Project awareness 8 DRDA/ZP cell Project awareness 9 SLNA Project awareness Project awareness
b) Strategies for capacity building
Briefly describe about strategies for capacity building
Kindly refer Table-SPSP 31 below.
72 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 31: List of Training Institutes@ identified for Capacity Building at State level (MIS Table-M(CB)1)
State Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Name & Full Address Name of the Designatio Area(s) of with contact Type of Accreditation S. No. Training n of the speciali- no., website Institute# details Institute Head of zation$ & e-mail Institute 1. MANAGE, Rajinder Dr. V.K. Capacity HYDERABA Nagar , Reddy, Building D Hyderabad Directot(HR ,vkreddy D) @manage.g ov.in 2. NIRD, Rajinder Central ---Do---- Hyderabad Nagar, Govt. Dept. Hyderabad Contact-040- 24016500 3. Punjab Firozepur Dr. M.S. University Agriculture/ Agriculture Road, Kang, Vice Horticulture/F University Ludhiana Chancellor orestry/Livelih ood 4. CSWCRTI, 218, Dr. Central Participatory Dehradhun Kaulagarh V.N.Sarda, Govt. Dept. Watershed Road, Director Development Dehradhun, 0135- 2758564
73 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
District Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Full Address Name & Name of the Area(s) of with contact Designation Type of Accreditation S. No. Training speciali- no., of the Head Institute# details Institute zation$ website & of Institute e-mail 1. MANAGE, Rajinder Dr. V.K. Capacity HYDERABA Nagar , Reddy, Building D Hyderabad Director ,vkreddy (HRD) @manage. gov.in 2. NIRD, Rajinder Central ---Do---- Hyderabad Nagar, Givt. Dept. Hyderabad Contact- 040- 24016500 3. Punjab Firozepur Dr. M.S. University Agriculture/ Agriculture Road, Kang, Vice Horticulture/F University Ludhiana Chancellor orestry/Livelih ood 4. CSWCRTI, 218, Dr. Central Participatory Dehradhun Kaulagarh V.N.Sarda, Govt. Dept. Watershed Road, Director Development Dehradhun, 0135- 2758564
74 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Project Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Name & Designatio Area(s) of Accredi Name of the Full Address with contact no., Type of S. No. n of the speciali- tation Training Institute website & e-mail Institute# Head of zation$ details Institute 1. Regional Station, Kangra Road , Jachh( Jasur), H.P. University Horticulture/F Dr. Y.S. Parmar orestry University of Horticulture, Jachh 2. Krishi Vigyan 01874-221743 Dr. Skill Kendra, P.K.Ghuma Enhancement Gurdaspur n Trainings to SHG/UG/Far mers 3 Soil & Water Near Dara Studio, Phase-VI, Er. Govt Soil & Water Conservation Mohali, S.K.Goel Departmen Conservation Training Institute, 9872001605 t Mohali 4. VIMARSH 445, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III, Sh. NGO Capacity Gurgaon, 0124-4264909/08 Manmohan Building Khosla
c) Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Activities: Describe the IEC activities to be undertaken under IWMP:
75 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table: SPSP 32: Details of IEC activities* (MIS Table-M(CB)3)
1 2 3 4 5 6 Estimated Expected Outcome S. Executing expenditure for District Activity (may quantify, No. agency XI Plan period wherever possible) (Rs. in lakh) nil nil nil nil
* From Column no. 2, total no. of Districts implementing the programme, from column no.3 no. of activities, from Column no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 total estimated expenditure may be given at the end of the table for the entire State.
76 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 11 11.0 Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E)
Briefly describe plan to comply following:
Table-SPSP 33: List of Institutes@ identified for M & E at State level
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Name & Name of the Accredi Full Address with contact no., Designation Type of Area(s) of speciali- S. No. Training tation website & e-mail of the Head Institute# zation$ Institute details of Institute 1 CSWCRTI, 218, Kaulagarh Road, Dr. Central Participatory Dehradhun Dehradhun, 0135-2758564 V.N.Sarda, Govt. Dept. Watershed Director Development 2 Punjab Firozepur Road, Ludhiana Dr. M.S. University Agriculture/ Agriculture Kang, Vice Horticulture/Forestry University Chancellor /Livelihood 3 VIMARSH 445, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III, Sh. NGO Capacity Building Gurgaon, 0124-4264909/08 Manmohan Khosla 4. Soil GG-3, National Societies Sh. S.K. Society Capacity Building, Conservatio Block,National Agricultural Science Dalal, Evaluation n Society of Centre Complex,Dev Prakash India Shastri Marg,Pusa Campus, New Coordinator Delhi-110012. 5. Agricultural B-1/9, Community Centre, M. Corporatio Capacity Building, finance Janakpuri, New delhi-110058. Manjunatha, n owned Evaluation Corporation, Dy. Gen. byBanks, Manager & NABARD Incharge
77 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 12
12 Expected outcomes
a) Briefly describe expected outcomes due to implementation of IWMP in the State,
Summarized in the table given below.
Table-SPSP 34: Expected/Estimated Outcomes (MIS Table-M(PO)F1)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Expected Name S. Unit of Pre-project Post- of the Item Remarks No. measurement Status project District Status Ropar Status of water table Mtr. 160-180 155-175 Ground water structures repaired/ No. rejuvenated Quality of drinking water Good Good Availability of drinking water Months 12 12 Increase in irrigation potential Ha 62 75 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Area under agricultural crop i Area under single crop Ha 7000 2000 ii Area under double crop Ha 60000 55000 iii Area under multiple crop Ha 6000 11000 Net increase in crop production area Ha 4000 Increase in area under vegetation Ha 5000 Increase in area under horticulture Ha 1000 Increase in area under fuel & fodder Ha 1000 Increase in milk production Kg/cattle/day 2 No. of SHGs No. Increase in no. of livelihoods No. Increase in income Rs. Per 2000 capita 78 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Migration No. / per - - village SHG Federations formed No. Credit linkage with banks No. Resource use agreements No. WDF collection & management Summary of lessons learnt Shall be furnished at the end of the project.
Gurdaspur Status of water table Feet 140 135 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated Quality of drinking water Good Good Availability of drinking water Months 12 12
Increase in irrigation potential Ha 1111 1225 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Area under agricultural crop i Area under single crop Ha 100 -
ii Area under double crop Ha 250 200 iii Area under multiple crop Ha 761 1050 Net increase in crop production area Ha 139 Increase in area under vegetation Ha 15 Increase in area under horticulture Ha 35 Increase in area under fuel & fodder Ha 05 Increase in milk production Litres/Day 500 No. of SHGs Nos 5 25 Increase in no. of livelihoods 05 Increase in income Rs/ Per Rs.700/Per Capita Capita Migration 50% reduction SHG Federations formed Nos Nil 1 Credit linkage with banks Nos 12 79 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Resource use agreements Nos 5 WDF collection & management Lacs Summary of lessons learnt Shall be furnished at the end of the project Hoshiarpur Status of water table Mtr. 125 110 Ground water structures repaired/ No. rejuvenated Quality of drinking water Good Good Availability of drinking water Months 8 12 Increase in irrigation potential Ha Change in cropping/ land use pattern Area under agricultural crop i Area under single crop Ha 200000 0 ii Area under double crop Ha 99667 135000 iii Area under multiple crop Ha 25000 40000 Net increase in crop production area Ha 200000 230000 Increase in area under vegetation Ha 88000 95000 Increase in area under horticulture Ha 8560 10000 Increase in area under fuel & fodder Ha 0 10000 Increase in milk production Kg/cattle/day 2-4 6-8 No. of SHGs No. Increase in no. of livelihoods No. Increase in income Rs. Per capita Migration No. / per 20-25 Nil village SHG Federations formed No. 0 2 Credit linkage with banks No. 0 80% SHG Resource use agreements No. 0 As per guidelines WDF collection & management 0 As per guidelines Summary of lessons learnt Shall be furnished at the end of the project.
************
80 IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB