ICOMOS Advisory Mission Report on the City of Quito, Ecuador (C 2) October 21-26, 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ICOMOS Advisory Mission Report on the City of Quito, Ecuador (C 2) October 21-26, 2013 María Rebeca Medina (ICOMOS) 21-26 October 2013 1 INDEX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. BACKGROUND TO THE MISSION City of Quito Inscription of the property in the World Heritage List Justification for retrospective statement of outstanding universal value Criteria on which the retrospective statement of outstanding universal value is based Integrity and/or Authenticity 2. NATIONAL POLICY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY AS WORLD HERITAGE a. International legal frame b. National legal frame Constitution of the Republic, 2008: National Plan for the Good Living 2009|2013. Organic Code of Land Management, Autonomy and Decentralization, COOTAD. Law N° 3501/79. Cultural Heritage of Ecuador. Modus Vivendi regulation Law N° 37/99. Environmental Management c. Local legal framework Ordinance N° 0260/0. HERITAGE AREAS d. Institutional framework 3. EVALUATION ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE PROPERTY Management Plan for the City of Quito | Inventory | Buffer Areas | Ordinances Company of Jesus Unit Project | Cloistered Hotel + Cultural Centre Quito´s subway | Integrated Transport System of Quito New public spaces | Revitalization Program for the Historical Centre New projects [list] Projects by MDMQ Projects by MIDUVI 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5. ANNEXES Annex I. Itinerary and program Annex II. Analysis of the current Legal Framework Annex III. Management Plan for the City of Quito Administrative flow for the approval of projects in Quito´s Historical Centre 2 Annex IV. Unit of the Company of Jesus IV. 1. Set. Current Low Flat and the one of the project IV. 2. Facades on Moreno and Sucre corner with the proposed auction option for the Bell Tower. IV. 3. Cutting through the Northern and Southern yards with the religious and social spaces Annex V. Quito’s Subway V. 1. Line Path 1 Quito Subway V.2. Geological Profile Line 1 Quito Subway V.3. Line Path 1 Quito Subway in QHC V.4. Exchanger in 24 de Mayo and San Francisco Station V.5. San Francisco Square V.6. Theater Station Annex VI. New Spaces VI. 1. Identification of the blocks affected due to the historical evolution in the QHC VI. 2. Convent in San Agustín block VI. 3. Monastery of the Immaculate Conception block VI. 4. Cathedral block 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This mission would like to express their acknowledgement to the authorities and professionals of each institution participating in the presentations and tours developed in each working date, beginning with the National Institute of Cultural Heritage, and continuing with the Metropolitan District of Quito, its Heritage Institute, the Secretariat of Territorial Planning and Housing, Quito Tourism, Quito Subway, Central Zone Administration, Ministry for the Coordination of Knowledge and Human Talent, MIDUVI, Church Foundation of the Company of Jesus, UNESCO Quito and ICOMOS Ecuador. It also appreciates all the assistance provided by the staff, officials and professionals that accompanied the preparation and the developing of the mission. To all, thank you very much. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS This report describes the Advisory Mission carried out for the City of Quito, a property inscribed on the World Heritage List since 1978. The Advisory Mission was derived from the request made by the State Party to assess the following aspects of Decision 37 COM 7B.97, adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013): “Assess the current state of conservation of the property and the development progress of the comprehensive conservation plan for the different sectors of cultural heritage, on guidelines and criteria established for the interventions in terms of changes of use. The mission will provide recommendations for actions to be carried out for the completion of the management plan, as well as other aspects to consider; a) Assess management and property protection mechanisms, including review of various planning tools thereof, and the analysis of decision-making and approval processes for new development projects, identifying potential areas of change and depending on the improvement of the management effectiveness, considering the potential integration of the tools, and ensuring the establishment of a clear management structure, optimizing participatory processes and institutional platforms to adequately enforce regulatory frameworks; b) Assess current and planned projects for the property to determine if the proposed project may have adverse effects on the attributes that express the Outstanding Universal Value of the property or their conditions of authenticity and integrity. Regarding the plans for the construction of the Quito Subway, the mission will assess the technical, environmental and social studies concerning the options of station location in the Historical Centre. Work will also be carried out jointly with national and local authorities and other stakeholders to accurately identify the location of the stations and the identification of alternatives in the design and execution of the project to ensure adequate protection of the property. Regarding the interventions proposed in the architectural unit of the Company of Jesus, the mission will provide guidance for the Development of Heritage Impact Assessments for the projects planned to ensure that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property is not threatened by the proposed projects. c) The mission will also assess on-going initiatives and projects for the whole recovery of the Historical Centre, in particular proposals involving demolition to enhance public spaces. The mission will consult with national and local authorities and other stakeholders on this issue and will provide recommendations on the actions to ensure the conservation and management of the property. Previous reports on the state of conservation of the World Heritage property reiterated the request to integrate the various tools implemented in safeguarding the cultural heritage of Quito, creating a comprehensive management system to ensure the governance of the Historic Centre in the long term, updating the national and municipal legal frameworks to conclusively define the responsibilities of management protocols and intervention processes. The State of Conservation report discussed by the World Heritage Committee in 2013 reiterates the permanence of the same shortcomings. In its conclusions, the report recognizes that the projects and interventions that the findings of this mission reveal, on the one hand, the interest of the authorities and of the private sector for the conservation of the property as well as on the proposals that may cause adverse impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, generated in absence of a comprehensive management plan. 5 This suggests that two of the proposed projects, located within the enclosed area, and in particular the proposed new public spaces may have a negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property. The report also notes the lack of a planning and management framework, and in the complex coordination that these instruments require to provide sufficient guarantees for the preservation of the property in the long-term. Factors affecting the property that are cited in the preceding reports are: a. Development pressures that can affect the authenticity of the property b. Weaknesses in the implementation process for decision-making concerning conservation c. Interventions in the Tower of the Company of Jesus Unit. To relate these factors, the Mission proposes the following observations and recommendations: Management Plan for the City of Quito The dispersion of management tools originates the overlapping of competencies and project development execution without the necessary control. It is necessary to complete the drafting of the Management Plan according to the criteria established [principles and evaluations], strengthening the attributes and values of the property– particularly those that sustain the Universal Outstanding Value - as guiding principles. Decision-making is shared and the organic frameworks of the institutions have been modified. Defining the enforcement authority of the Management Plan and bylaws governing the property, giving it a consistent hierarchy in the Institutional chart, should consolidate governance for the property. It is recommended to complete the updating process of the legislation and other management tools being developed at both national and municipal levels, and complete the approval processes for their implementation. It is recommended that once the development is completed and the revision of the Inventory is institutionalized that this serve as the framework for the enforcement of existing regulations related to the protection of the Historic Centre of Quito, both at national and municipal levels, integrating it into the urban planning scale and not only applicable to the property in isolation. The management tools that are updated and those to be generated for the property must start from the incorporation of the attributes that express its Outstanding Universal Value and for the preservation of authenticity and integrity conditions. Company of Jesus Unit | Cloistered Hotel + Cultural Centre + Residence + Church of the Company of Jesus Foundation Offices In the development of the remainder of the project and during the execution of the work the following is required: Interventions that