DOCSLIB.ORG

Ranking Operator by Oil 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ranking Operator by Oil 2020 PDRANKOP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PRODUCTION BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT 21-SEP-2021 GULF OF MEXICO REGION PAGE: 1 Production by Operator Ranked by Volume Start Date : 202001 Report Type : Report End Date : 202012 Group By : All Report Option: Order by Total Oil Operator Crude Oil Condensate Total Oil Natural Gas Casinghead Total Gas (BBLS) (BBLS) (BBLS) (MCF) (MCF) (MCF) 00689 Shell Offshore Inc. 139,615,018 4,258,015 143,873,033 23,178,353 158,383,248 181,561,601 02481 BP Exploration & Production Inc. 108,685,976 0 108,685,976 0 79,229,182 79,229,182 00981 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 65,414,595 88,968 65,503,563 620,947 56,902,819 57,523,766 00078 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 51,101,569 35,339 51,136,908 171,373 27,409,121 27,580,494 02647 Murphy Exploration & Production Co 28,144,052 295,777 28,439,829 15,793,001 39,861,289 55,654,290 00059 Hess Corporation 19,597,716 7,619,083 27,216,799 28,724,947 26,769,663 55,494,610 00003 Union Oil Company of California 25,973,471 0 25,973,471 0 6,216,497 6,216,497 02010 BHP Billiton Petroleum (GOM) Inc. 16,260,827 0 16,260,827 0 7,120,975 7,120,975 02058 LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. 15,460,461 464,063 15,924,524 4,791,756 19,089,073 23,880,829 03295 Fieldwood Energy LLC 12,775,821 1,221,840 13,997,661 22,473,028 17,027,082 39,500,110 00276 Exxon Mobil Corporation 12,761,244 0 12,761,244 0 2,486,899 2,486,899 03362 Kosmos Energy Gulf of Mexico Opera 11,467,626 0 11,467,626 162,888 10,979,302 11,142,190 03026 EnVen Energy Ventures, LLC 9,494,205 375,652 9,869,857 1,794,393 11,564,572 13,358,965 02899 Talos ERT LLC 7,988,947 35,113 8,024,060 137,770 10,536,339 10,674,109 02628 Arena Offshore, LP 6,879,733 1,014,964 7,894,697 13,686,792 17,882,394 31,569,186 00730 Walter Oil & Gas Corporation 6,006,140 1,657,411 7,663,551 26,208,540 10,252,253 36,460,793 03567 Beacon Growthco Operating Company, 7,508,359 0 7,508,359 0 10,468,186 10,468,186 03151 Cox Operating, L.L.C. 6,384,822 1,031,798 7,416,620 24,323,816 9,025,383 33,349,199 01834 Talos Petroleum LLC 5,909,109 142,054 6,051,163 1,365,098 8,036,994 9,402,092 01284 W & T Offshore, Inc. 3,659,570 1,995,233 5,654,803 19,868,217 7,230,878 27,099,095 00162 Eni Petroleum Co. Inc. 4,508,125 114,240 4,622,365 8,718,806 6,607,663 15,326,469 03481 Cantium, LLC 3,793,616 36,944 3,830,560 560,861 2,827,997 3,388,858 02117 Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. 2,130,414 0 2,130,414 0 16,704,124 16,704,124 02451 GOM Shelf LLC 1,640,749 144,448 1,785,197 2,028,419 1,587,568 3,615,987 03059 ANKOR Energy LLC 1,365,588 178,062 1,543,650 2,396,822 1,465,884 3,862,706 03247 Talos Energy Offshore LLC 874,958 72,837 947,795 3,910,387 6,257,729 10,168,116 02961 Byron Energy Inc. 839,127 37,190 876,317 2,924,622 557,222 3,481,844 03209 Renaissance Offshore, LLC 385,396 115,386 500,782 1,058,026 461,819 1,519,845 02528 Equinor USA E&P Inc. 441,340 0 441,340 0 381,862 381,862 02806 Marubeni Oil & Gas (USA) LLC 376,217 43,075 419,292 0 804,301 804,301 02970 Castex Offshore, Inc. 229,273 172,083 401,356 4,111,441 3,512,986 7,624,427 01978 Helis Oil & Gas Company, L.L.C. 0 371,832 371,832 904,631 0 904,631 03520 Sanare Energy Partners, LLC 202,102 90,767 292,869 3,720,078 223,505 3,943,583 03148 W & T Energy VI, LLC 156,187 128,457 284,644 3,481,584 392,502 3,874,086 02066 Ridgelake Energy, Inc. 254,317 0 254,317 0 89,765 89,765 PDRANKOP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PRODUCTION BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT 21-SEP-2021 GULF OF MEXICO REGION PAGE: 2 Production by Operator Ranked by Volume Start Date : 202001 Report Type : Report End Date : 202012 Group By : All Report Option: Order by Total Oil Operator Crude Oil Condensate Total Oil Natural Gas Casinghead Total Gas (BBLS) (BBLS) (BBLS) (MCF) (MCF) (MCF) 02795 GoMex Energy Offshore, Ltd. 165,332 80,424 245,756 0 0 0 03165 Apache Deepwater LLC 0 236,307 236,307 412,431 0 412,431 03521 Deepwater Abandonment Alternatives 215,213 0 215,213 0 347,143 347,143 02957 MC Offshore Petroleum, LLC 200,926 0 200,926 0 197,340 197,340 02375 Energy XXI GOM, LLC 128,471 34,377 162,848 599,637 84,837 684,474 02579 Tana Exploration Company LLC 1,406 98,923 100,329 1,184,224 1,105 1,185,329 03093 Bois d' Arc Exploration LLC 71,781 0 71,781 0 36,312 36,312 02266 EPL Oil & Gas, LLC 51,455 4,554 56,009 0 25,463 25,463 03368 Whitney Oil & Gas, LLC 39,343 12,737 52,080 21,695 47,600 69,295 03619 Talos Third Coast LLC 40,392 10,040 50,432 397,781 653,281 1,051,062 02503 Contango Operators, Inc. 0 45,938 45,938 7,232,933 0 7,232,933 02967 Peregrine Oil & Gas II, LLC 22,071 0 22,071 0 22,299 22,299 01986 Flextrend Development Company, L.L 12,317 1,801 14,118 3,917 7,325 11,242 02800 Monforte Exploration L.L.C. 3,759 0 3,759 0 3,970 3,970 03288 Cochon Properties, LLC 0 765 765 441,332 0 441,332 03572 BOE Exploration & Production LLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 02513 Petro Ventures, Inc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 03147 EC Offshore Properties, Inc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 03472 TOPCO OFFSHORE, LLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 03255 High Point Gas Gathering, L.L.C. 0 0 0 104,461 0 104,461 00540 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING 0 0 0 0 0 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Doug Lawler Vice
    www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACTS: John Colglazier Vice President 832/636-2306 Dean Hennings Doug Lawler Manager 832/636-2462 Vice President, Operations Wayne Rodrigs Manager 832/636-2305 May 25, 2011 www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Other Matters This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Anadarko’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential impact thereon. While Anadarko believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions as and when made, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation, including the following: Anadarko's ability to successfully drill, complete, test and produce the wells and prospects identified in this presentation; to meet financial and operating guidance; to execute the 2011 capital program and meet the long-term goals identified in this presentation; the outcome of events in the Gulf of Mexico relating to the Deepwater Horizon event and the Company’s ability to successfully defend its stated position under the corresponding Operating Agreement; the legislative and regulatory changes, such as delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits, exploration plans andoil spill response plans, that may impact the Company’s Gulf of Mexico and International offshore operations resulting from the Deepwater Horizon event.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadarko Petroleum Co. Civil Penalty Ruling
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 15606 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater * Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, * MDL 2179 on April 20, 2010, * * * SECTION J This Document Applies To: * * * JUDGE CARL BARBIER No. 10-4536, United States of America v. BP * Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. * * MAG. JUDGE SALLY SHUSHAN * * ——————————————————————————————————————— FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PENALTY PHASE Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 15606 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 34 CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 A. Factual Background ......................................................................................................... 3 B. The Government’s Complaint.......................................................................................... 4 C. Relevant Prior Rulings ..................................................................................................... 6 D. The CWA’s Civil Penalty Factors ................................................................................... 7 II. Findings of Fact ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Factor 1: Seriousness ....................................................................................................... 8 B. Factor 2: Economic Benefit ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Halliburton Company
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 OR [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____ Commission File Number 001-03492 HALLIBURTON COMPANY (a Delaware corporation) 75-2677995 3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East Houston, Texas 77032 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Telephone Number – Area Code (281) 871-2699 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Petion to Object to the Anadarko Petroleum Frederick Compressor
    BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF ) Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC/Anadarko ) PETITION TO OBJECT TO Petroleum, Frederick Natural Gas ) ISSUANCE OF A STATE Compressor Station ) TITLE V OPERATING ) PERMIT Permit Number: 95OPWE035 ) ) Petition Number: VIII-2010- Issued by the Colorado Department of ) Public Health and Environment, Air ) Pollution Control Division ) ) PETITON FOR OBJECTION Pursuant to Section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act, 40 C.F.R. § 70.8(d), and applicable state regulations, WildEarth Guardians hereby petitions the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter “Administrator” or “EPA”) to object to the July 14, 2010 Response of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division (hereafter “Division”) to the October 8, 2009 Order by the Administrator objecting to the issuance of the renewed Title V Permit for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation’s (hereafter “Anadarko’s”) Frederick Compressor Station, Permit Number 95OPWE035 (hereafter “Title V Permit”), which was issued on January 1, 2007.1 The Title V Permit, the Technical Review Document for the Title V Permit, and the Division’s Response to Objection are attached hereto. See Exh. 1, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, Frederick Compressor Station Title V Permit, Permit Number 95OPWE035 (January 1, 2007); Exh. 2, Technical Review Document (“TRD”) for Renewal of Operating Permit 95OPWE035 (January 1, 2007) and Technical Review Document Addendum (April 28, 2008); Exh. 3, Division Response to October 8, 2009 Objection by the Administrator (July 14, 2010). In her objection, the Administrator found that the Division “failed to adequately support its determination of the source for PSD [Prevention of Significant Deterioration] and title V purposes.” See Ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Water Depth Workshop 2011
    Table of Contents Workshop Steering Committee ....................................................................................... iii Session Chairs ................................................................................................................ iii Recorder Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... v Administrative Staff Acknowledgements ........................................................................ vii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Introduction to Technical Summaries .............................................................................. 5 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #1 – Surface BOPs ...................................... 9 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #2 – Subsea BOPs ................................... 17 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #3 – Well Drilling and Completion Design and Barriers ............................................................................................................ 23 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #4 – Pre-Incident Planning, Preparedness, and Response .............................................................................................................. 33 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #5 – Post Incident Containment and Well Control ............................................................................................................ 37 Technical Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 20 Other Released Parties
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6430-38 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 20 Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6430-38 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 6 Other Released Parties Abdon Callais Offshore, Inc. Admiral Robert J Papp Jr. Admiral Thad Allen Admiral Towing, LLC Aerotek, Inc. Airborne Support, Inc. Airborne Support International, Inc. Alford Safety Services Inc. Alford Services Inc. Ameri-Force, Inc. Ameri-Force Craft Services, Inc. American Pollution Control Corporation Anadarko Petroleum Company Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Anadarko E&P Company LP Apex Environmental Services, LLC Art Catering, Inc. Ashland Services, LLC B&B Environmental Services, Inc. Belle Chasse Marine Transportation, Inc. BJ Services Company, USA Blue Marlin Services of Acadiana, LLC Bobby Lynn's Marina, Inc. BP America Inc. BP America Production Company BP Company North America Inc. BP Corporation North America Inc. BP Energy Company BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. BP Global Special Products (Americas) Inc. BP Holdings North America Limited BP Exploration & Production Inc. BP p.l.c. BP Products North America Inc. BP International Ltd. BP Corporation North America Inc. Savings Plan Investment Oversight Committee Brett Cocales Brian Morel Cabildo Services, LLC Cabildo Staffing, LLC Cahaba Disaster Recovery LLC Cal Dive International, Inc. Cameron Corporation Cameron International Corporation Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation Cameron International Corporation d/b/a/ Cameron Systems Corporation Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health L.L.C. Chill Boats L.L.C. Chouest Shorebase Services, LLC Clean Harbors, Inc. Clean Tank LLC Clean Tank Inc. Core Industries, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferguson V. BP
    Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES and CONSTANCE FERGUSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT vs. JURY DEMAND BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-10-281 COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007, LLC; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; and M-I, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiffs James and Constance Ferguson, individually and as representatives of the class defined herein, bring this action against Defendants BP, PLC; BP America, Inc.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Company North America, Inc.; BP Exploration & Production, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; Moex Offshore 2007, LLC; Transocean Ltd.; Transocean, Inc.; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.; Transocean Deepwater, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC, as follows: {00406819.DOC-1} - 1 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 2 of 29 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs are owners of property on the Gulf of Mexico on the southern shore of the State of Alabama. They bring this class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Defendants for losses and damages arising out of the catastrophic and avoidable oil spill off the Gulf Coast caused by the April 20, 2010 explosion and fire aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig (“Deepwater Horizon”), and the subsequent sinking of that rig and the discharge of oil into the surrounding water.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater * Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, * MDL 2179 on April 20, 2010, * * * SECTION J This Document Applies To: * * No. 10-2771, In re: The Complaint and Petition * JUDGE BARBIER of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al. * * and * MAG. JUDGE SHUSHAN * No. 10-4536, United States of America v. BP * Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. * ——————————————————————————————————————— FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PHASE TWO TRIAL Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 44 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court enters these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law relative to the Phase Two trial. If any finding is in truth a conclusion of law or any conclusion stated is in truth a finding of fact, it shall be deemed so, labels notwithstanding. CONTENTS I. Introduction and Procedural History ................................................................................. 3 II. Source Control Segment ....................................................................................................... 5 A. Parties to the Source Control Segment ............................................................................. 5 B. Stipulated Facts; Timeline of Source Control Events ...................................................... 6 i. Terms and Definitions.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Edgar, Et Al. V. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Et Al. 17-CV
    Case 4:17-cv-01372 Document 35 Filed in TXSD on 11/02/17 Page 1 of 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ROBERT EDGAR, Individually and On § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-01372 Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, § § [CORRECTED]1 AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, § ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION v. § OF THE SECURITIES LAWS § ANADARKO PETROLEUM § CLASS ACTION CORPORATION, R.A. WALKER, and § ROBERT G. GWIN, § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. § § § § Lead Plaintiff Iron Workers Benefit and Pension Fund – Iron Workers District Counsel Philadelphia & Vicinity (“Philadelphia Iron Workers” or “Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by its undersigned attorneys, for its complaint against Defendants Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (“Anadarko”), R. A. Walker, Robert G. Gwin, Robert K. Reeves, and Darrell E. Hollek (“Defendants”), alleges the following upon personal knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters, based on an investigation made by and through its counsel. I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a securities class action brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or acquired the common stock of Anadarko between February 8, 2016 and May 2, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), pursuing remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) against Anadarko 1 Filed with Defendants’ consent. 1 Case 4:17-cv-01372 Document 35 Filed in TXSD on 11/02/17 Page 2 of 44 and certain of its top officials. 2. Anadarko engages in oil and gas exploration, development, and production, as well as other oil industry-related businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    LSTLEASE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LEASE ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 01-OCT-2021 GULF OF MEXICO REGION Listing - Active and/or Expired Leases Leases: ACTIVE Sort by: Area/Block Appendix Report: Not Included District Code: All Districts ******************************************************************* *** *** *** NOTICE: NOTWITHSTANDING THE LEASE STATUS AS INDICATED *** *** *** *** BY THIS REPORT, FOR PURPOSES OF UPCOMING LEASE SALES, *** *** *** *** STATUS IS CONTROLLED BY THE PROPOSED LEASE SALE NOTICE *** *** *** *** AS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER. *** *** *** ******************************************************************* NOTICE: P behind a block number indicates the lease covers only a portion of the block. M behind a block number indicates the lease is in more than one block. A in the Appeals/Pend Act column indicates lease is under appeal. P in the Appeals/Pend Act column indicates pending action on the lease. LSTLEASE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LEASE ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 01-OCT-2021 GULF OF MEXICO REGION PAGE: 1 Listing - Active and/or Expired Leases Leases: ACTIVE Sort by: Area/Block Appendix Report: Not Included District Code: All Districts Dist Appeals/ Lease Lease Status Order Designated Lease Code Pend Act Type Area Block Status Date 4 Det Operator(s) G10379 4 O&G AC 24 PROD 02/10/2010 Y EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION G10380 4 O&G AC 25 UNIT 10/13/2010 Y EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION G10381 4 O&G AC 26 UNIT 10/13/2010 Y EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION G36486
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Oil Spill: the Market Value Consequences of the Deepwater
    The Big Oil Spill: The Market Value Consequences of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster Name: G.J.H. Goossens ANR: 397966 Graduation Date: November 22, 2012 Graduation Department: Finance Supervisor: dr. O.G. Spalt Faculty: Tilburg School of Economics and Management Table of contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Research Plan 4 3. BP and its business environment 5 4. Consequences of the Deepwater Horizon disaster 8 5. Response BP 12 6. Who is liable for the damage done? 16 7. The market value consequences 18 7.1 The market value consequences for BP 18 7.2 The market value consequences for the partners 26 7.3 The market value consequences for the competitors 30 7.4 The market value consequences for the suppliers 36 7.5 The market value consequences for the oilfield services companies 40 8. The winners 44 9. Conclusion 45 10. References 50 11. Appendix 53 1 1. Introduction Two and a half years ago the Deepwater Horizon oil rig spewed nearly five million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, making it the largest accidental oil spill in the history. The spill exceeded the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill as the largest ever to originate in waters controlled by the United States and the 1979 Ixtoc I oil spill as the largest spill in the Gulf of Mexico. On April 20, 2010 the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, an ultra-deepwater offshore drilling rig, exploded in the Gulf of Mexico about 41 miles off the Louisiana coast, killing 11 rig workers and injuring 17 others. The fire burned for 36 hours and the Macondo Prospect leaked approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil before it was closed and sealed almost three months later on July 15.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Oil Spill Litigation
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 1805-1 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 84 36753615 Mar 29 2011 11:03PM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig * MDL No. 2179 “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf * of Mexico, on April 20, 2010 * SECTION: J These Pleadings apply to: * All Cases in Pleading Bundle B3 * * (Also Applies to: No. 10-2771) * JUDGE BARBIER * * MAGISTRATE *SHUSHAN * * * * * * * * * * * * FIRST AMENDED MASTER COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PTO NO. 11 [CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1] SECTION III.B(3) [“B3 BUNDLE”] Complaint in Admiralty Rule 9(h) Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 1805-1 Filed 03/29/11 Page 2 of 84 I. INTRODUCTION On April 20, 2010, an explosion on board the oil vessel Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico marked the beginning of what would become the most pervasive and devastating environmental disaster in the history of the United States. The explosion resulted in an oil spill of unprecedented proportions and an oil slick that grew exponentially, depleting and destroying marine and coastal environments and estuarine areas in the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas and Florida (the “Gulf States”). In an ill-conceived effort to contain and to clean up the spill, massive amounts of chemical dispersants were sprayed from the air, at the surface of the Gulf and beneath the surface of the water. Vast quantities of oil and debris were burned at the surface of the Gulf or skimmed from the water. Beaches, marshes and wetlands fouled by oil and chemicals have been the focus of a variety of remedial efforts to remove the hazardous materials from these fragile areas.
    [Show full text]