Ferguson V. BP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ferguson V. BP Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES and CONSTANCE FERGUSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT vs. JURY DEMAND BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-10-281 COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007, LLC; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; and M-I, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiffs James and Constance Ferguson, individually and as representatives of the class defined herein, bring this action against Defendants BP, PLC; BP America, Inc.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Company North America, Inc.; BP Exploration & Production, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; Moex Offshore 2007, LLC; Transocean Ltd.; Transocean, Inc.; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.; Transocean Deepwater, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC, as follows: {00406819.DOC-1} - 1 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 2 of 29 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs are owners of property on the Gulf of Mexico on the southern shore of the State of Alabama. They bring this class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Defendants for losses and damages arising out of the catastrophic and avoidable oil spill off the Gulf Coast caused by the April 20, 2010 explosion and fire aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig (“Deepwater Horizon”), and the subsequent sinking of that rig and the discharge of oil into the surrounding water. 2. On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon, an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, exploded and caught fire. It burned for two days before tipping into the sea, on its way bending and breaking the long riser pipe carrying oil to the surface from the seafloor. As the Deepwater Horizon sank, it broke off the riser, leaving the pipe leaking oil out of its now-open end as well as through two breaks along its length. An emergency valve, installed on the wellhead for just such a disaster, failed to seal the wellhead as it should have, leaving the well spewing oil into the Gulf waters. 3. Tens of thousands of barrels per day of crude oil have been leaking from the wellhead and broken riser, bubbling up to the surface and flattening out into a widening slick of oil, as well as spreading out in vast subsurface plumes. The growing, fast-moving, rainbow- colored smear is large enough to be visible from outer space, covering tens of thousands of square miles, and spreading with the wind and currents towards the Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Florida coastlines. 4. The spilled oil has already caused damage to the beachfront and coastal areas of Alabama and the Gulf of Mexico, where Plaintiffs’ and the Class Members’ property is located. With the wellhead unabated gushing of hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil per day into the {00406819.DOC-1} - 2 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 3 of 29 waters near Alabama, Plaintiffs and Class Members are suffering and will continue to suffer serious losses. II. PARTIES 5. James and Constance Ferguson are Illinois residents who own two condominiums on the Gulf of Mexico in Gulf Shores, Alabama. 6. As a result of the events described herein, Plaintiffs have suffered ascertainable losses and damages. 7. Defendant BP, PLC is a British corporation, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. BP is one of the world’s largest oil companies. 8. Defendant BP America, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Warrenville, Illinois, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. BP America, Inc. is a subsidiary of BP, PLC. 9. Defendant BP Corporation North America, Inc. (formerly BP Amoco Corporation), is an Indiana corporation with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. BP Corporation North America, Inc. is a subsidiary of BP America, Inc. 10. Defendant BP Company North America, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Warrenville, Illinois, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. BP Company North America, Inc. is a subsidiary of BP Corporation North America, Inc. 11. Defendant BP Products North America, Inc. is a Maryland corporation, with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and {00406819.DOC-1} - 3 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 4 of 29 throughout the United States. BP Products North America, Inc. is a subsidiary of BP Company North America, Inc. 12. Defendant BP Exploration & Production, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Warrenville, Illinois and executive address in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. was the lease operator of the Deepwater Horizon at the time of the explosion. 13. Defendants BP America, Inc., BP Corporation North America, Inc., BP Company North America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc., and BP Exploration & Production, Inc. are wholly owned subsidiaries of the global parent corporation, BP, PLC, and they shall be referred to herein collectively as “BP.” 14. BP holds the lease granted by the U.S. Minerals Management Service (“MMS”) that allows BP to drill for oil and perform oil-production-related operations at the Macondo site in the Mississippi Canyon Block 252 section of the outer continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. As of April 20, 2010, BP operated the Macondo oil well that is the source of the current oil spill. 15. Defendant Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (“Anadarko”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in The Woodlands, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Anadarko is an oil and gas exploration and production company that owns a 25% interest in the Macondo well at Mississippi Canyon Block 252. 16. Defendant MOEX Offshore 2007, LLC (“MOEX”) is incorporated in Delaware and has its principal place of business in Houston, Texas. MOEX Offshore 2007 holds a 10% interest in the Macondo well at Mississippi Canyon Block 252. {00406819.DOC-1} - 4 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 5 of 29 17. Defendant Transocean Ltd. is a Swiss corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Transocean Ltd. is the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor and leading provider of drilling management services worldwide. 18. Defendant Transocean, Inc. is a Cayman Islands corporation with its principal places of business on Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, and in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Transocean, Inc. is a wholly- owned subsidiary of Transocean Ltd. 19. Defendant Transocean Deepwater, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Transocean Deepwater, Inc. is a subsidiary of Transocean Ltd. 20. Defendant Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. is a subsidiary of Transocean Ltd. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. is the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor. 21. Defendants Transocean, Inc., Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. are wholly owned subsidiaries of the global parent corporation, Transocean Ltd., and they shall be referred to herein collectively as “Transocean.” 22. Transocean owned, and BP was leasing and operating, the Deepwater Horizon as it performed production well completion operations on the Macondo well on the outer continental shelf off the Gulf Coast, at the site from which the oil spill now originates. 23. At all times material hereto, the Deepwater Horizon was owned, manned, possessed, managed, controlled, chartered and/or operated by Transocean and/or BP. {00406819.DOC-1} - 5 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 6 of 29 24. Defendant Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (“Halliburton”) is a Delaware corporation with two headquarters, one in Houston, Texas and one in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Halliburton is one of the world’s largest providers of products and services to the energy industry. Aboard the Deepwater Horizon, Halliburton was engaged in the cementing operations of the well and well cap. 25. Defendant Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation (“Cameron”) is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas, but doing business in the State of Alabama and throughout the United States. Cameron is a global provider of pressure control, processing, flow control and compression systems as well as project management and aftermarket services for the oil and gas and process industries. Cameron manufactured and/or supplied the Deepwater Horizon’s blowout preventer valve (“BOP”) that failed to activate at the time of the explosion. 26.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law.
    [Show full text]
  • Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report
    Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report STEINHAUSEN, Switzerland—February 12, 2021—Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) today issued a quarterly Fleet Status Report that provides the current status of, and contract information for, the company’s fleet of offshore drilling rigs. As of February 12, the company’s total backlog is approximately $7.8 billion. This quarter’s report includes the following updates: Deepwater Corcovado – Customer exercised a 680-day option in Brazil; Deepwater Mykonos – Customer exercised a 815-day option in Brazil; Development Driller III – Awarded a one-well contract extension in Trinidad; Development Driller III – Awarded a one-well contract, plus a one-well option in Trinidad; Transocean Norge – Awarded a one-well contract in Norway; Transocean Barents – Awarded a three-well contract in Norway; Paul B Loyd, Jr. – Awarded a 78-day contract extension in the U.K. North Sea; Dhirubhai Deepwater KG1– Customer exercised a seven-well option in India; and Deepwater Nautilus – Customer provided notice of termination of its drilling contract in Malaysia. Additionally, the company has retired the Leiv Eiriksson. The rig is classified as held for sale. The report can be accessed on the company’s website: www.deepwater.com. About Transocean Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of, 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release +1 713-232-7551
    Transocean Ltd. Investor Relations and Corporate Communications Analyst Contacts: Thad Vayda News Release +1 713-232-7551 Diane Vento +1 713-232-8015 Media Contact: Pam Easton FOR RELEASE: June 22, 2015 +1 713-232-7647 TRANSOCEAN LTD. PROVIDES FLEET UPDATE SUMMARY ZUG, SWITZERLAND—June 22, 2015—Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) (SIX: RIGN) today issued a monthly Fleet Update Summary, which includes new contracts, changes to existing contracts, and changes in estimated planned out-of-service time of 15 or more days since the May 18, 2015 Fleet Update Summary. The total value of new contracts since the last report is approximately $109 million. The report includes the following: Transocean Andaman – Awarded a one year contract extension offshore Thailand at a dayrate of $115,000 ($42 million estimated backlog). Deepwater Champion – Awarded a three month contract extension in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico at a dayrate of $395,000 ($36 million estimated backlog). GSF Galaxy II – Awarded a one well contract extension in the U.K. sector of the North Sea at a dayrate of $190,000 ($17 million estimated backlog). Sedco Express – Awarded a 45 day contract offshore Nigeria at a dayrate of $300,000 ($14 million estimated backlog). The company has amended its construction contracts with Sembcorp Marine’s subsidiary, Jurong Shipyard, to delay the delivery of its two newbuild, ultra-deepwater drillships by 24 months. The two drillships are now expected to be delivered in the second quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020, respectively. The GSF Monarch and Transocean Spitsbergen are idle. The Spitsbergen’s well program concluded 45 days early due to efficient performance of the rig; the contract provides for a payment to the company in the event of an early termination.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Companies to the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston
    Matching Gift Companies to the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston AbbVie ConocoPhillips Petroleum Co. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company ACE INA Foundation Cooper Industries Nuevo Energy Company Administaff Dell Occidental Petroleum Adobe Deutsche Bank Americas Foundation Ocean Energy Aetna Foundation, Inc. Dominion Foundation Pepsico Foundation AIM Foundation Dow Chemical Company Pfizer Foundation Air Liquide America Corp. Dresser-Rand Phillips 66 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Duke Energy Foundation/ECO6Q PipeVine, Inc. Albemarle Corporation Dynegy Inc. Procter & Gamble Allstate Foundation ECG Management Consultants Inc. Prospect Capital Management Amerada Hess Corporation Eli Lilly and Company Foundation Prudential American Express Encap Investments LP Rockwell International Corporation American General Corporation Entergy SBC Foundation American International Group Inc. Enterprise Products Shell Oil Company Foundation Ameriprise Financial EP Energy Southdown, Inc. Amica Companies Foundation EOG Resources Southwestern Energy (SWN) Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Equistar Chemicals LP Square D Foundation Anderson Greenwood Equiva Services LLC Teleflex Foundation Anheuser-Busch Foundation Exelon Foundation Tenet Healthcare Foundation Apache Corporation ExxonMobil Foundation Tenneco Apple Inc Fleet Boston Financial Foundation Texaco Inc. Arco Foundation, Inc. Ford Texas Instruments Foundation Arco Steel Inc FMC Technologies, Inc. The Boeing Company ARS National Services, Inc. General Electric The Clorox Company Attachmate General Mills,
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 105/Wednesday, June 2
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 1999 / Notices 29669 2. Insurance Project in Brazil DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE oilfield facilities associated with subsea 3. Insurance Project in Argentina wellbores. As used herein, ``subsea 4. Insurance Project in Argentina Antitrust Division wellbores'' means offshore wellbores 5. Insurance Project in Turkey having a subsea wellhead at or near the Notice Pursuant to the National sea bottom. However, the scope of 6. Insurance Project in Algeria Cooperative Research and Production 7. Pending Major Projects DeepVision's operations does not Act of 1993ÐDeepVision L.L.C. extend to services provided by 8. Report on Equity Fund Notice is hereby given that, on March Transocean Offshore Inc.'s (and its CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: 12, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the affiliates') existing fleet of conventional Information on the meeting may be National Cooperative Research and coiled tubing drillling vessels and obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 systems for semi-submersibles and 336±8438. et seq. (``the Act''), Baker Hughes offshore platforms, nor to Baker Hughes Dated: May 28, 1999. DeepVision Holdings, Incorporated has Incorporated's (and its affiliates') coil Connie M. Downs, filed written notification tubing services of the type OPIC Corporate Secretary. simulataneously with the Attorney corresponding to their existing services [FR Doc. 99±14045 Filed 5±28±99; 2:53 pm] General and the Federal Trade that operate (a) Onshore, (b) through surface completions or (c) through BILLING CODE 3210±01±M Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and conventional subsea workover, drilling objectives of the venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC As Follows
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CARDEN SIMCOX, and all others similarly situated; Plaintiff, CASE NO. VS. BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP JURY DEMAND CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007, LLC; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; and M-I, LLC, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Carden Simcox, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, brings this class action against Defendants BP, PLC; BP America, Inc.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Company North America, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; BP Exploration & Production, Inc.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; MOEX Offshore 2007, LLC; Transocean Ltd.; Transocean, Inc.; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.; Transocean Deepwater, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC as follows: Case 3:10-cv-00514 Document-11 Filed 05/25/10 1 of 30 1 879716.1 Page PagelD I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is an owner ofbeachfront property in Panacea, Wakulla County, Florida, on the Gulf of Mexico. She brings this class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Defendants for losses and damages arising out of the catastrophic and avoidable oil spill off the Gulf Coast that was caused by the April 20, 2010, explosion and fire aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig ("Deepwater Horizon"), and the subsequent sinking of that rig and the discharge of oil into the surrounding water.
    [Show full text]
  • ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Doug Lawler Vice
    www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACTS: John Colglazier Vice President 832/636-2306 Dean Hennings Doug Lawler Manager 832/636-2462 Vice President, Operations Wayne Rodrigs Manager 832/636-2305 May 25, 2011 www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Other Matters This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Anadarko’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential impact thereon. While Anadarko believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions as and when made, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation, including the following: Anadarko's ability to successfully drill, complete, test and produce the wells and prospects identified in this presentation; to meet financial and operating guidance; to execute the 2011 capital program and meet the long-term goals identified in this presentation; the outcome of events in the Gulf of Mexico relating to the Deepwater Horizon event and the Company’s ability to successfully defend its stated position under the corresponding Operating Agreement; the legislative and regulatory changes, such as delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits, exploration plans andoil spill response plans, that may impact the Company’s Gulf of Mexico and International offshore operations resulting from the Deepwater Horizon event.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) VALARIS PLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    Case 20-34114 Document 16 Filed in TXSB on 08/19/20 Page 1 of 63 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) VALARIS PLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-34114 (MI) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) (Emergency Hearing Requested) DEBTORS’ EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION AND APPOINTMENT OF STRETTO AS CLAIMS, NOTICING, AND SOLICITATION AGENT EMERGENCY RELIEF HAS BEEN REQUESTED. A HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON THIS MATTER ON AUGUST 20, 2020 AT 2:00 PM IN COURTROOM 404, 4TH FLOOR, 515 RUSK AVENUE, HOUSTON, TX 77002. YOU MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING EITHER IN PERSON OR BY AUDIO/VIDEO CONNECTION. AUDIO COMMUNICATION WILL BE BY USE OF THE COURT’S DIAL-IN FACILITY. YOU MAY ACCESS THE FACILITY AT (832) 917-1510. YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN LONG-DISTANCE CHARGES. ONCE CONNECTED, YOU WILL BE ASKED TO ENTER THE CONFERENCE ROOM NUMBER. JUDGE ISGUR’S CONFERENCE ROOM NUMBER IS 954554. YOU MAY VIEW VIDEO VIA GOTOMEETING. TO USE GOTOMEETING, THE COURT RECOMMENDS THAT YOU DOWNLOAD THE FREE GOTOMEETING APPLICATION. TO CONNECT, YOU SHOULD ENTER THE MEETING CODE “JUDGEISGUR” IN THE GOTOMEETING APP OR CLICK THE LINK ON JUDGE ISGUR’S HOME PAGE ON THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WEBSITE. ONCE CONNECTED, CLICK THE SETTINGS ICON IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER AND ENTER YOUR NAME UNDER THE PERSONAL INFORMATION SETTING. HEARING APPEARANCES MUST BE MADE ELECTRONICALLY IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING. TO MAKE YOUR ELECTRONIC APPEARANCE, GO TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WEBSITE AND SELECT “BANKRUPTCY COURT” FROM THE TOP MENU.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1 Subsidiaries of Transocean Ltd. As of December 31, 2010
    Annex 1 Subsidiaries of Transocean Ltd. as of December 31, 2010 Name Jurisdiction Registered Office Share Capital Interest 15375 Memorial Corporation Delaware Wilmington USD 1,000 100.00% Aguas Profundas, Limitada Angola Luanda USD 100,200 100.00% Angola Deepwater Drilling Company (Offshore Services) Ltd. Cayman Islands George Town USD 0.01 65.00% Angola Deepwater Drilling Company (Operations) Ltd Cayman Islands George Town USD 0.01 65.00% Angola Deepwater Drilling Company Ltd Cayman Islands George Town USD 1.00 65.00% AngoSantaFe - Prestacao de Servicos Petroliferos, Limitada Angola Luanda AOA 17,220,000 49.00% Applied Drilling Technology Inc. Texas Dallas USD 1,000 100.00% Arcade Drilling AS Norway Stavanger NOK 216,065,250 100.00% Ashgrove Carriers Ltd. Liberia Montserrado USD 100 50.00% Asie Sonat Offshore Sdn Bhd Malaysia Kuala Lumpur MYR 100,000 49.00% Blegra Asset Holdings Limited Cyprus Limassol CYP 1,000 100.00% Blegra Asset Management Limited Cyprus Limassol CYP 1,000 100.00% Blegra Financing Limited Cyprus Limassol CYP 1,000 100.00% Blegra Holdings Limited Cyprus Limassol CYP 1,000 100.00% Campeche Drilling Services Inc. Delaware Wilmington USD 1,000 100.00% Challenger Minerals (Accra) Inc. Cayman Islands Grand Cayman USD 1,000 100.00% Challenger Minerals (Celtic Sea) Limited British Virgin Islands Tortola USD 1.00 100.00% Challenger Minerals (Ghana) Limited Ghana North Labone GHC 57,500 100.00% Challenger Minerals (Nigeria) Limited Nigeria Lagos NGN 10,000,000 100.00% Challenger Minerals (North Sea) Limited Scotland Aberdeen GBP 3,870,351 100.00% Challenger Minerals Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry
    The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Prepared For Prepared By Executive Summary Introduction Despite the current difficulties facing the global economy as a whole and the oil and natural gas industry specifically, the Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry will likely continue to be a major source of energy production, employment, gross domestic product, and government revenues for the United States. Several proposals have been advanced recently which would have a major impact on the industry’s activity levels, and the economic activity supported by the Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and natural gas industry. The proposals vary widely, but for the purpose of this report three scenarios were developed, a scenario based on a continuation of current policies and regulations, a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new offshore leases, and a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new drilling permits approvals in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners (EIAP) was commissioned by the National Ocean Industry Association (NOIA) to develop a report forecasting activity levels, spending, oil and natural gas production, supported employment, GDP, and Government Revenues in these scenarios. The scenarios developed in this report are based solely upon government and other publicly available data and EIAP’s own expertise and analysis. The study also included profiles of NOIA members to demonstrate the diverse group of companies which make up the offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry as well as a list of over 2,400 suppliers to the industry representing all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • News from Hiring Source
    September 2015 A New Perspective on Crude Prices West Texas Intermediate flirted with $60 a barrel in June, but the commodity is unlikely to return to that neighborhood anytime soon. The world has just too much of the black stuff. The International Energy Agency puts the global surplus at 3.0 million barrels per day, which exceeds the combined daily output from the Eagle Ford (1.5 million barrels) and the Bakken (1.2 million barrels) oil basins. With slower growth expected in China, Iranian crude soon to hit global markets and OPEC’s refusal to cut production, crude will likely remain below $60 for some time. Analysts hoped for a brief downturn. They pointed to the plunging rig count in the spring, forecasted a decline in output by summer, and expected a rebound in prices by fall. In April, a month after WTI averaged $47 on the spot market, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecast crude to hit $55 this month and $70 by February. But the drop in U.S. production never materialized. Production is still 600,000 barrels above June 2014, the month in which WTI peaked at $108 per barrel. WTI now trades in the mid-$40s and the EIA doesn’t expect crude to reach $55 until the middle of next year. The futures market supports the EIA outlook. WTI contracted for December 2015 delivery now trades at $47 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Crude for delivery in December 2016 trades at $52. Weak oil prices have chewed up corporate balance sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • Halliburton Look to the Future
    ENERGYPOINT Customer Satisfaction Update V. 1.1 RESEARCH Halliburton January 17, 2013 SATISFACTION Resilient Through the Ups and Downs RATINGS When EnergyPoint published its first-ever report in 2004, Halliburton was in the midst of a high-profile juggling act of sorts. The company was not only grappling with asbestos-related legal issues inherited as part of its ill- fated Dresser Industries acquisition, its now-jettisoned KBR subsidiary was taking flak, both in the media and in ATTRIBUTES Washington D.C., over a series of inutile contracts with the U.S. military. At the time, we weren't sure if these dual distractions were contributing to the company's then-lackluster oilfield customer satisfaction scores. In Rating Trend retrospect, it appears they were. Halliburton's ratings improved appreciably once the issues were resolved and management was able to more fully concentrate on its mainstay energy-services business. And concentrate it did. The company smartly swore off major acquisitions, choosing to focus on organic growth opportunities TOTAL SATISFACTION AVG STABLE within its existing portfolio. As shale development began to take off domestically, its hydraulic fracturing expertise became increasingly coveted by upstream clients. By mid 2009, after managing through the prerupt decline in global rig count in late 2008 and early 2009, our surveys indicated Halliburton was effectively hitting Job Quality AVG STABLE on all cylinders. Unfortunately, nothing lasts forever. As both demand and expectations grew, customer satisfaction began to decline in 2010. Everything from equipment wear and tear to soaring prices for guar gum Post Sale Support AVG STABLE played a part.
    [Show full text]