Norway: Drilling to the Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Doug Lawler Vice
www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACTS: John Colglazier Vice President 832/636-2306 Dean Hennings Doug Lawler Manager 832/636-2462 Vice President, Operations Wayne Rodrigs Manager 832/636-2305 May 25, 2011 www.anadarko.com | NYSE: APC Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Other Matters This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “believe,” “expect,” “plan” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Anadarko’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential impact thereon. While Anadarko believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions as and when made, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation, including the following: Anadarko's ability to successfully drill, complete, test and produce the wells and prospects identified in this presentation; to meet financial and operating guidance; to execute the 2011 capital program and meet the long-term goals identified in this presentation; the outcome of events in the Gulf of Mexico relating to the Deepwater Horizon event and the Company’s ability to successfully defend its stated position under the corresponding Operating Agreement; the legislative and regulatory changes, such as delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits, exploration plans andoil spill response plans, that may impact the Company’s Gulf of Mexico and International offshore operations resulting from the Deepwater Horizon event. -
Status, Utfordrings- Og Intensjonsbilde
Status, utfordrings- og intensjonsbilde Mulighetsutredning kommunestruktur Evenes, Harstad, Ibestad, Kvæfjord, Lødingen, Skånland og Tjeldsund Innhold Sammendrag ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Regjeringens mål for kommunereformen ....................................................................................... 9 2 Regjeringens kriterier for god kommunestruktur ......................................................................... 10 ................................................. 10 4 Kartlegging og analyse demografiske og sosioøkonomiske forhold ............................................. 11 4.1 Befolkningsutvikling .............................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Befolkningssammensetning .................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Privat og offentlig sysselsetting ............................................................................................. 15 4.4 Næringssammensetting ........................................................................................................ 16 4.5 Flyttemønster i kommunene ................................................................................................. 20 4.6 Avstand, kommunikasjon og senterfunksjoner ..................................................................... 22 4.7 Lokalisering og arealbruk ..................................................................................................... -
Schedule Port O F Call
Valid from: Schedule 1st. Jan 2017 CL PL H-1 Kvitbjørn Nordkinn Silver River Hurtigruten Kvitnos Silver Lake NORTHBOUND Turku Paldiski Eemshaven Wednesday M) Cuxhaven Wednesday Swinoujscie Wednesday Fredericia Hundested (Købehavn) Thursday Grenå (Århus) Lysekil Hirtshals Oslo Drammen Fredrikstad Friday Larvik Kristiansand Saturday M) Lyngdal Sandnes Thursday E) Saturday E) Håvik Haugesund Sunday M) Bergen Friday M) Sunday Daily Florø Monday M) Daily Måløy Daily Torvik Daily Ørsta Ålesund Saturday M) Monday Daily Molde Saturday Daily Kristiansund Daily Trondheim Saturday E) Daily Rørvik Tuesday Daily Brønnøysund Daily Port of call Port of Sandnessjøen Tuesday E) Daily Nesna Daily Ørnes Daily Bodø Monday M) Wednesday M) Daily Stamsund Daily Svolvær Monday Wednesday Daily Stokmarknes Daily Sortland Daily Risøyhamn Daily Harstad Monday E) Wednesday E) Daily Finnsnes Thursday M) Daily Tromsø Tuesday Thursday Daily Skjervøy Thursday E) Daily Øksfjord Friday M) Daily Alta Fredag Hammerfest Wednesday M) Friday E) Daily Havøysund Saturday M) Daily Honningsvåg Daily Kjøllefjord Southbound Daily Mehamn Daily Berlevåg Daily Båtsfjord Southbound Daily Vardø Daily Vadsø Saturday Daily Kirkenes Saturday E) Daily Remarks refer to time of departure form the particular port: Day M) Dept. between hours 00:00 - 08:00 Day Dept. between hours 08:00 - 16:00 Nor Lines AS Day E) Dept. between hours 16:00 - 24:00 Tlf: +47 51 84 56 50 [email protected] 2) Port call only if agreed with liner office Stavanger Valid from: 1st. Schedule Jan 2017 CL PL H-1 Kvitbjørn -
Anadarko Petroleum Co. Civil Penalty Ruling
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 15606 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater * Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, * MDL 2179 on April 20, 2010, * * * SECTION J This Document Applies To: * * * JUDGE CARL BARBIER No. 10-4536, United States of America v. BP * Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. * * MAG. JUDGE SALLY SHUSHAN * * ——————————————————————————————————————— FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PENALTY PHASE Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 15606 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 34 CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 A. Factual Background ......................................................................................................... 3 B. The Government’s Complaint.......................................................................................... 4 C. Relevant Prior Rulings ..................................................................................................... 6 D. The CWA’s Civil Penalty Factors ................................................................................... 7 II. Findings of Fact ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Factor 1: Seriousness ....................................................................................................... 8 B. Factor 2: Economic Benefit .......................................................................................... -
Halliburton Company
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 OR [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____ Commission File Number 001-03492 HALLIBURTON COMPANY (a Delaware corporation) 75-2677995 3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East Houston, Texas 77032 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Telephone Number – Area Code (281) 871-2699 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. -
Petion to Object to the Anadarko Petroleum Frederick Compressor
BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF ) Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC/Anadarko ) PETITION TO OBJECT TO Petroleum, Frederick Natural Gas ) ISSUANCE OF A STATE Compressor Station ) TITLE V OPERATING ) PERMIT Permit Number: 95OPWE035 ) ) Petition Number: VIII-2010- Issued by the Colorado Department of ) Public Health and Environment, Air ) Pollution Control Division ) ) PETITON FOR OBJECTION Pursuant to Section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act, 40 C.F.R. § 70.8(d), and applicable state regulations, WildEarth Guardians hereby petitions the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter “Administrator” or “EPA”) to object to the July 14, 2010 Response of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division (hereafter “Division”) to the October 8, 2009 Order by the Administrator objecting to the issuance of the renewed Title V Permit for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation’s (hereafter “Anadarko’s”) Frederick Compressor Station, Permit Number 95OPWE035 (hereafter “Title V Permit”), which was issued on January 1, 2007.1 The Title V Permit, the Technical Review Document for the Title V Permit, and the Division’s Response to Objection are attached hereto. See Exh. 1, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, Frederick Compressor Station Title V Permit, Permit Number 95OPWE035 (January 1, 2007); Exh. 2, Technical Review Document (“TRD”) for Renewal of Operating Permit 95OPWE035 (January 1, 2007) and Technical Review Document Addendum (April 28, 2008); Exh. 3, Division Response to October 8, 2009 Objection by the Administrator (July 14, 2010). In her objection, the Administrator found that the Division “failed to adequately support its determination of the source for PSD [Prevention of Significant Deterioration] and title V purposes.” See Ex. -
The Norwegian Fjords and Arctic Russia
1 THE NORWEGIAN FJORDS AND ARCTIC RUSSIA Bergen – Hellesylt, Geiranger - Harstad, Lofoten islands – Tromso – Honningsvag – Archangel – Murmansk – Kristiansund - Haugansund 22 June – 7 July 2015 Text by John Biggs © 2015 Images by John Biggs and Catherine Tang © 2015 2 Bergen Norway has a population of only 5.1 million, 1.1 million in the capital Oslo. Bergen is the next largest city has 270,000 inhabitants spread over a huge area connected by road, light rail, or boat. Norway split from Sweden in 1905 and for many years was the poor relation in Scandinavia. But then North Sea oil flowed voluminously late last century, and now it is the richest country per capita in the world, so we were told. If fossil fuels were dropped tomorrow Norway would be right because it invested a huge amount of oil and gas profits in a Futures Fund current value $900 billion, which will see Norway through any foreseeable financial crisis. Scandinavian reason asserts itself once again. Norway is like the other Scandinavian countries a social democracy and very sensitive to climate change issues: electric cars aren’t taxed or registered and they can use bus lanes, but the government is now finding they can’t afford these generous concessions for much longer. Bergen and its suburbs are situated inland on a network of fjords that must make it one of the most beautiful places on earth. The fjords are created by giant slow moving glaciers that gouge out deep valleys that are then flooded by the sea. Thus fjords have access to the ocean, are very deep and have high mountain walls whereas bays are shallow and not created by glaciers. -
Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Mamelund, Svenn-Erik Working Paper The Spanish Influenza among Norwegian ethnic minorities 1918 - 1919 Memorandum, No. 2001,29 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, University of Oslo Suggested Citation: Mamelund, Svenn-Erik (2001) : The Spanish Influenza among Norwegian ethnic minorities 1918 - 1919, Memorandum, No. 2001,29, University of Oslo, Department of Economics, Oslo This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62990 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MEMORANDUM No 29/2001 The Spanish Influenza among Norwegian ethnic minorities 1918-1919 By Svenn-Erik Mamelund ISSN: 0801-1117 Department of Economics University of Oslo This series is published by the In co-operation with University of Oslo The Frisch Centre for Economic Department of Economics Research P. -
Effects of Water Depth Workshop 2011
Table of Contents Workshop Steering Committee ....................................................................................... iii Session Chairs ................................................................................................................ iii Recorder Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... v Administrative Staff Acknowledgements ........................................................................ vii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Introduction to Technical Summaries .............................................................................. 5 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #1 – Surface BOPs ...................................... 9 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #2 – Subsea BOPs ................................... 17 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #3 – Well Drilling and Completion Design and Barriers ............................................................................................................ 23 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #4 – Pre-Incident Planning, Preparedness, and Response .............................................................................................................. 33 Technical Summary of Workshop Session #5 – Post Incident Containment and Well Control ............................................................................................................ 37 Technical Summary -
Exhibit 20 Other Released Parties
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6430-38 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 20 Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6430-38 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 6 Other Released Parties Abdon Callais Offshore, Inc. Admiral Robert J Papp Jr. Admiral Thad Allen Admiral Towing, LLC Aerotek, Inc. Airborne Support, Inc. Airborne Support International, Inc. Alford Safety Services Inc. Alford Services Inc. Ameri-Force, Inc. Ameri-Force Craft Services, Inc. American Pollution Control Corporation Anadarko Petroleum Company Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Anadarko E&P Company LP Apex Environmental Services, LLC Art Catering, Inc. Ashland Services, LLC B&B Environmental Services, Inc. Belle Chasse Marine Transportation, Inc. BJ Services Company, USA Blue Marlin Services of Acadiana, LLC Bobby Lynn's Marina, Inc. BP America Inc. BP America Production Company BP Company North America Inc. BP Corporation North America Inc. BP Energy Company BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. BP Global Special Products (Americas) Inc. BP Holdings North America Limited BP Exploration & Production Inc. BP p.l.c. BP Products North America Inc. BP International Ltd. BP Corporation North America Inc. Savings Plan Investment Oversight Committee Brett Cocales Brian Morel Cabildo Services, LLC Cabildo Staffing, LLC Cahaba Disaster Recovery LLC Cal Dive International, Inc. Cameron Corporation Cameron International Corporation Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation Cameron International Corporation d/b/a/ Cameron Systems Corporation Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health L.L.C. Chill Boats L.L.C. Chouest Shorebase Services, LLC Clean Harbors, Inc. Clean Tank LLC Clean Tank Inc. Core Industries, Inc. -
Ferguson V. BP
Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES and CONSTANCE FERGUSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT vs. JURY DEMAND BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-10-281 COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007, LLC; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION; and M-I, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiffs James and Constance Ferguson, individually and as representatives of the class defined herein, bring this action against Defendants BP, PLC; BP America, Inc.; BP Corporation North America, Inc.; BP Company North America, Inc.; BP Exploration & Production, Inc.; BP Products North America, Inc.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; Moex Offshore 2007, LLC; Transocean Ltd.; Transocean, Inc.; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.; Transocean Deepwater, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation; and M-I, LLC, as follows: {00406819.DOC-1} - 1 - Case 1:10-cv-00281 Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 2 of 29 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs are owners of property on the Gulf of Mexico on the southern shore of the State of Alabama. They bring this class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Defendants for losses and damages arising out of the catastrophic and avoidable oil spill off the Gulf Coast caused by the April 20, 2010 explosion and fire aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig (“Deepwater Horizon”), and the subsequent sinking of that rig and the discharge of oil into the surrounding water. -
The Horse Flies (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Norway
© Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 8 December 2014 The Horse Flies (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Norway MORTEN FALCK Falck, M. 2014. The Horse Flies (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Norway. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 61, 219–264. The Norwegian species are reviewed, and keys are supplied for all species. The following species are reported as new to Norway: Chrysops viduatus (Fabricius, 1794), Atylotus latistriatus Brauer, 1880, Hybomitra aterrima (Meigen, 1820), Hybomitra solstitialis (Meigen 1820), Haematopota italica Meigen, 1804, Haematopota subcylindica Pandellé, 1883 and Tabanus miki Brauer, 1880. The finding of Hybomitra aterrima solves the question of whether this taxon is a southern form of Hybomitra auripila Meigen, 1820 or a good species, and the long standing controversies over this question. However, the identity of Atylotus latistriatus seems to offer an unresolved problem. Maps of distribution, and a check list to the Norwegian species are supplied, and new Norwegian names are proposed for each species. Key words: Diptera, Tabanidae, Chrysops, Atylotus, Hybomitra, Tabanus, Heptatoma, Haematopota, Atylotus latistriatus, Hybomitra aterrima, Norway, identification keys, distribution maps. Morten Falck, Hovinveien 39, NO-0661 Oslo Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Meigen, 1820, and the danish priest O. Fr. Müller, who in 1764 described Haematopota arcticus Horse flies are big to medium-sized flies of the (Müller, 1764), later synonymized with H. lower Brachycera, comprising an estimated 4500 pluvialis (Linnaeus, 1758). As the northern parts species worldwide (Marshall 2012). Their size, of the country was researched by the pupils and abundance and the females’ blood-sucking make heirs of Linnaeus, more species were named. I. C. them one of the groups that most people relate to, Fabricius named Hybomitra borealis (Fabricius, have names for and know.