Bibliographie générale4

Abbi A. & Gopalakrishnan D., 1992, The explicates compound verb: some definitional issues and criteria for identification, Indian Linguistics 53 : 1-4, p. 28^6. Abbi A., 1992, Reduplication in South Asian languages. An Areal, Typological and Historical Study, New Delhi, Allied Publishers. Abbi A., l994,Semantic Universals in Indian Languages, Simla, Indian Institute of Advanced Study. AbbiDelhi. A. (ed.), Motilal 1996, Banarsidass, The Languages Senes inand Linguistics Tribes of 10. Indigenous Peoples of , Agesthiafingom S., 1977, A Grammar of Old Tamil with special reference to Patirrupattu (Phonology and verb morphology), Annamalainagar, Annamalai University Press. AgesthialingomAnnamalai Nagar, S. & Annamalai Srinivas Univ.Varma Press. G., 1980, Auxiliaries in Dravidian, Allen N., 1975, Sketch of Thulung grammar, Ithaca, Cornell East Asia Papers 6, Andronoy M. S., 1964? On the Typological Similarity of New bido-Aryan and Dravidian, Indian Linguistics 25, p. 1 19-26. AndronovTamil StudiesM. S., 1976,10, p. The1-12. negative in Dravidian : A comparative study, Journal of Annamalai E., Jerundd H. B. & Rubin J., (eds.), 1986, Language Planning, Mysore, Central Institute for Indian Languages. Anscombre J.-C, 1973, Même le roi de France est sage, Communications 20, p. 40- Apte M. L., 1974, Pidginization of a Lingua Franca : A Linguistic Analysis of - spoken m Bombay, in F. C. Southworth & M. L. Apte (eds.), Contact and Convergence in South Asian languages, HDL 1-3, p. 21-41. Arden A. it, 1976. A progressive grammar of the , Madras, CLS. Asher RE., 1968, Existential, possessive, locative and copulative sentences in , in J.W. M. Verhar (ed), The verb 'Be' and its synonyms, vol.6 (2), Foundations of language supplementary series, Dordrecht, p. 88-1 II. Asher R.E., 1982. Tamil, Lingua descriptive study, volume 7, Amsterdam, North Holland publishing company. Bach E., 1967, Have and Be in English syntax, Language 43 П. BahugunaHMSansthán. L. M., 1986, Hindr-Bangli Sanyukt Kriys (Vyaiirek/višlešac), Kendrï/ Baker С L., 1995, Contrast, discpurse prominence and intensification, with special reference to locally-free reflexives in British English, Language 71-1, p. 63-101. Bakker P. 1991, In the Margin of Rromani : Gypsy Languages in Contact, Amsterdam, Publ. Van Het ffistituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap. Balakrishnan R., 1977, A grammar ofKodagu, Annamalai Nagar, India, Annamalai University. Beams J., Í872-1879, A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Indo-Aryan , Londres (réimpr. Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal, 1970).

* Les éditeurs ne sont pas reponsables des manques potentiels dans les références bibliographiques.

© Editors, FAITS DE LANGUES, 1997 | DOI: 10.3406/19589514-01001030 This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 248 Faits de langues

Benedict P. K., 1972, Sino-Tibetan : a Conspectus (contributing éd. J. A. Matisoff), Cambridge. Benveniste E., 1952, La construction passive duparfait transistif, BSL XLVin, repris dans Problèmes de linguistique générale 1, Paris, Gallimard, p. П6-86. Benveniste E., I960, 'Etre' et avoir' dans leurs fonctions linguistiques, BSL LV, repris dans Problèmes de linguistique Générale 1, Paris, Gaffimard, p. 187-207. Benveniste E., 1966, La phrase nominale, in Problèmes de linguistique générale 1, Paris, Gallimard, p. 151-167. Benveniste E., 1966, Les Transformations des catégories grammaticales, Problèmes de linguistique générale 2, Paris, Gallimard, p. Г27-136. Benveniste E., 1966, Problèmes de linguistique générale, tome I, Paris, Gallimard. Berntsen R. M., 1973, The Speech of Phaltan : A Study in Linguistic Variation, Thèse de linguistique. Université de Pennsylvanie (Ann Arbor). Beyer S. V., 1992, The Classical Tibetan Language, Albany, State University of New York Press. Bhagwat M. M, 1967. The Varhadi Dialect. A Study of VarhM Dialect in the Neighbourhood ofAkola, Thèse de linguis. non publiée, Poona, "Deccan College. Bhat p. N. Sy 1968, Shqnkara Boro ' vocabulary, with a grammatical sketch, Building Centenary series 59, Decean College, Poona. Bhat D. N. S., 1994, The Adjectival Category : Criteria for Differentiation and Identification, Amsterdam, John Benjamins. Bhatia T. K., 1995, Negation in South Asian Languages, Patiala, Indian Institute of Language Studies. Bhattacharya P. Ch., 1977. A Descriptive Analysis of the , Dpt of Publications, Gauhati University. Bhattacharya S., 1975a, Studies in Comparative Munda Linguistics, Simla, Indian Institute of Advanced Studies. Bhattacharya S., 1975b, Munda Studies : A New Classification of Munda, Indo- Iranian Journal XVU-1, p. 97-101. Bhide V., 1982, A Descriptive Study of Chitpavni, A Dialect ofMarathi, Thèse de linguistique non publiée, Poona, Deccan College. Bielmeier R., 1988, The Reconstruction or the Stop Series and Verbal System in Tibetan, Languages in History in East Asia, Fescnrift for Datsuo Nishida, Kyoto- Shokado, p. 15-27. Biligiri H. S., 1965, Kharia, Poona, Decean College. Bloch J., [1919] 1970, The Formation of the [trad, revue de La Formation de la langue marathe, Paris, Maisonneuve], Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Bloch J., 1906, La Phrase nominale en sanscrit, Paris, Champion, Mémoires de la Société de linguistique de Paris XIV. Bloch J., 1919, La formation de la langue marathe, Paris, Honoré Champion. Bloch J., 1924, et dravidien, BSLP 25, p. 1-21. Bloch J., 1935, La forme négative du verbe dravidien, [repris dans С Caillât (1985) (textes rassemblés par), Recueil d'articles de J. Bloch 1906-1955, Paris]. Bloch I, 1946, Structure grammaticale des langues dravidiennes, Pans, Adrien- Maisonneuve. Bloch J., 1950, Les Inscriptions ďAsoka, Paris, Belles Lettres. Bloch J., 1965a, Indo-Aryanjrom the Vedas to Modem Times (trad, revue par l'auteur de 1934), Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Bloch J., 1965b, L'indo-aryen, Paris, 1934, édition revue par l'auteur et traduction en anglais d'Alfred Master, Indo-Aryan from Vedas to Modem Times, Paris, Adrien-Maisonneuve. BorkarZadi H. Dialect), P.. 1994, Thèse Jhàd, de Boitelinguistique Bhâsàvaijfimik non publiée, Adhyayan , Université(Linguistic de Analysis Nagpur. of

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 249

Bradley D., 1994, Tibeto-Burman languages, in Atlas of the World's Languages Christopher Moseley & RE.Asher (eds.l Routledge. Bray D., 1909, The Brahui language, parts I, П, Ш, Calcutta, India. Breton R., 19/6, Atlas géographique des langues et des ethnies de l'Inde, Pr. Univ. de Laval, Québec. ч 6 Breunis A., 1990, The Nominal Sentence in Sanskrit and Middle Indo-aryan, Leiden, Brill. Broschart J., 1997, Why Tongian does it differently? Categprial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs, Linguistic Typology 1-2, p. 123-66. Burling R., 1961, A Garo grammar, Pooiul Deccan College Monograph 25. Burling R, 1989, The Sal languages, LTBA 111, p. 79-91. Burrow T. & Bhattacharya S., 1953, The Parji Language, Hertford, England. Burrow T. & Bhattacharya S., 1970. The Pengo Language, Oxford, Clarendon Press. BurrowClarendon T. & Emeneau Press, éd. M.révisée В., I960. [1984]. A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary, Oxford, Burton-Page J., 1955, Two studies in Gurungkura : П: Rhotacization and retroflexion. BSOAS 17, p. 11 1-1 19. Bybee J., 1994, The Grammaticization of zero : asymétries in tense and aspect systems, in Current Trends in Linguistic Theory 109 (Perspectives on Grammaticalization), p. 237-353. Bybee J., Perkins R. & Pagliuca W., 1994, The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world, Chicago/Londres, Chicago Univ. Press. Cain B. D. & Gair J. W.; 1995, Sinhala and Dhivehi Comparative Syntax: Some Questions about Questions, Travailprésenté à SALA, Univ. of Texas, Austin. Caldwell R., 1856, A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages, Madras, Univ. of Madras (rééd. 1913, 1961,1987). Cardona G., 1970, The Indo-iranian Construction mana/mama kritam, Language 46, Chafe W.'& Nichols J. (eds.). 1986, Eyidentiality. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemploy, New- Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation ChakrabartiK.P.Bagghi&Cie. В., 1992, A Comparative* StudyУ ofSantaliJ and Bengali,6 Calcutta/Delhi, Chang K. &5hefts В., 1980, Ergativity in spoken tibetan, AS/BIHP of History and [xi zang kouyu zhong de dong ci], Vol 51/1, p. 15-32. Chatterji R., 1988, Aspect and Meaning in Slavic and Indie, Amsterdam / Philadelphie, John Benjamins. Chatterji S. K., 1986 [1926], The Development of the , Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Chevillard J.-L., 1991, Remarques sur l'évolution du système des temps en tamoul, Bulletin des Etudes indeiennes 9. Chidambaranatha Pillai V., 1978, A grammar of the Kasaba Language, Annamalai Nagar, India, Annamalai University. ChitnisMohadi V. S.,in 1964,the Dhulia The KhandeshiTaluka, Thèse Dialect de ling., as Spoken Poona, by/Deccan Farmers College in the (publiée Village enof marathi : Khmdeš, Ek SthànikAbhyàs, Poona, Presuj Prakášan, 1984). ChopdeThèse T. de N., linguistique 1971, Marathi non publiée,as Spoken Poona, by Lewa Deccan Patidars College. in and around Bhusawal, Comrie В., 1987, The Major Languages of the world, (2ème éd. 1989), Oxford Univ. Press. Courthiade M, 1995, Phonologie des parlers nom et diasystème graphique de la langue rromani. Thèse pour le doctorat, Paris Щ. Courthiade M., 1988, Les latérales en rromani, Lingua posnaniensis XXXI, p. 47- 80.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 250 Faits de langues

Croît Wy 1994, The Semantics of Subjecthood, in M. Yaguello (éd.), Subjecthood and Subjectivity, Paris, Ophrys. Culioli A., 1990, La négation : marqueurs et opérations, in Pour une linguistique de Yenunciation. Opérations et représentations, tl, Paris, Ophrys, p. 91-113. Daladier A., 1996, Le rôle des verbes supports dans un système de conjugaison nominale et l'existence d'une voix nominale en français, Langages 121, p. 35-52. Das Gupta К., 1977, A Phrase Book in Miju, Shillong. Das Gupta P., 1983, On the Bangla Classifier Ta, its prenumhra, and definiteness, Indian linguistics 44, p. 11-26. Das Gupta P., 1992, Pronominality and deixis in Bangla, Linguistic Analysis 22 :l-2, p. 61-77. Das R. P., 1995, The Hunt for Foreign Words in the Rig Veda, Indo-Iranian Journal 38, p. 207-38 DeLancey S., 1981, An Interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns, Language 57, p. 626-657. DeLanceyLinguistic S., Research1982, Lhasa (IULC) Tibetan 2 /1. : a case study in ergative typology, Journal of DeLancey S., 1985, On active typology and the nature of aeentivity, in F. Plank (éd.), Relational Typology, Berlin- Amsterdam-New York, Mouton, p. 47-60. DeLancey S., 1986, Tividentiality and vqlitionality in Tibetan, in W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.). Evidentially. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemoloy, New- Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation, p. 203-213. DeLanceycommunication S., 1989, présentée The historicalà la 22nd statusInternational of the Conference conjunct/disjunct on Sino-Tibetan Pattern, Languages and Linguistics, Hawaï. DeLancey S., 1990. Ergative and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan, Cognitive linguistics 1-3. p. 289-321. Deshpande M.M. & Hook P. E. (eds.), 1979, Aryan and non-Aryan in India, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Deshpande "N., 1979, Genesis of Rigyedic retroflexion. A Historical and sociolineuistic Investigation, in M. M. Deshpande & P. E. Hook (eds.), 235-315. Deshpande N., 1976, Descriptive Analysis ofThákar, Dialect, These de linguistique non publiée, Poona, Deccan College. Dharmadasa K. N. O., 1974, The Creolization of an Aboriginal Language : the Case of Vedda in Sri Lanka (Ccylon),Anthropological Linguistics 16-2,_p. 79-196. DimockSociolinguistics E.C., Kachru in South B.J. Asia, & KrishnamurtiDelhi, Oxford andBh.JedsJ, ШН Publ. 1992, Dimensions of Dixon R. M? W., 1979, Ergativity, Language 55/1, p. 59-138. Dixon R. M. W., 1994, Ergativity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Dressier W., 1968, Veddive-dive und idg. Iterativkomposita, in M. Mayrhofer et al. (eds), Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft und Kulturkunde : Gedenkschrift fur Wilhelm" Brandestein,' 39-47 (Innesbruçker* Beitrage zur Kulturwissenschaft, 14). i, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Dakkhini speakers^Ayuxe,, Central Institute for . Indian„ ...... ,, Languages. A Case study of Dubois J. W., 1980. Beyond definiteness : the trace of identity in discourse, in W. L. Chafe (éd.). The Pear Stories : Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, New Jersey, Ablex PubUshing Corporation, p. 203-274. DuričDucrotO.. R., 1990, 1980, Fonološki Echelles sistemqrgumentatives, romskog jezika Paris, iMinuit. njegov alfabet u svetiu etimoloških istraživanja, Warsaw Working Papers, p. 1-52. DuttaK. P.S. &Singh Syed gen. Ishteaque ed), Calcutta, A., Ï995, Anthropological Arunachal Pradesh Survey (Peopleof India. of India, vol. 14, Elfenbeim J., 1983, The Brahui problem again, Indo-TIranian Journal* 25, p. 103-32.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 251

Elfenbeim J., 1987, The periplus of the Brahui problem, Studia Iranica 16, p. 215- 33. ElizarenkovaIJDL 1-2, p.T., 126-37\ 1972. Influence of Dravidian Phonological System on Sinhalese, Emeneau M. В., 1955, Kolami a Dravidian Language, Berkeley et Los Angeles, Univ. of California Press (Univ. of California Publications in Linguistics 12). Emeneau M. В., 1956, India as a linguistic area, Language 32-1, p. 3-16. Emeneau M. В., 1961г Kolami a dravidian language, Annamalai Nagar, Annamalai Unversity publications in linguistics. Annamalai University. Emeneau M. В., 1967, The South , J.A.Ó.S. 87, p. 365-412. Emeneaup. 274-99. M. В., 1969, Onomatopeics in the Indian Linguistic Area, Language 45-2, Emeneau M. В., 1970, Dravidian Comparative Phonology : A Sketch, Annamalai Nagar, Annamalai University Press. Emeneau M. В.. 1974, The Indian Linguistic Area revisited, in F. C. Southworth & M. L. Apte (eds.), Contact and Convergence in South Asian languages, IJDL 1- 3, p. 92-134. EmeneauDravidian M. В.,Linguistics 1974, The 3-1, Linguisticp. 92-134. Area Revisited, International Journal of Emeneau M. В., 1984, Toaa Grammar and Text, Philadelphia, American Philosophical Society. Emeneau M. В., 1994, Dravidian Studies: Selected Papers, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Faiservis W. A., 1971, The Roots of Ancient India. The Archeology of Early Indian Civilization, Londres, G. Allen Lonwin. Faiserwis W. A., 1992, The Harappan Civilization and Its Writing. A Model for the Decipherment of the Indus Script, Lahore, Vangard Books. Falk ft, 1993, Schrift im alien indien. Ein Forsehungsbericht mit Anmerkungen (ScnptOrafia 56), Tubingen, Gunter Narr. FauconnierSemantikos,p. G., 1976,1-3. Remarques sur la théorie des phénomènes scalaires, Forest R., 1993, Négations. Essai de syntaxe et de typologie linguistique, Paris, Klincksieck. French W. T., 1983, Northern Nasa, A Tibeto-Burman Mesolanguqge.Ph.D. Gair J. W., & Sumangala L., 1991, What to Focus in Sinhala, m G. F. Westohal & al. (eds.). ESCOL91, p. 93-108. Ohio State University Working Papers, GRDS. Gair J. W., Í970. Colloquial Sinhalese Clause Structures, The Hague, Mouton. Gair J. W., 19/6, The Verb in Sinhala. With Some Preliminary Remarks on Dravidianization, IJDL 5-2, p. 259-73. Gair J. W., 1986, Sinhala Focused Sentences: Naturalization of a Caique, in Bh. Krishnamurti, C. P. Masica & A. Sinna (eds.), South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Digbssia, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 147-164. Gair J. W., à paraître, Non-cœfigurationality, movement and sinhala focus, Travail présenté en 1983 devant la Linguistics Association of Great Britain, Newcastle. À paraître dans J. W. Gair, Studies in South Asian Linguistics: Sinhala and Other Languages, Oxford & New York, Oxford University Press. Gambhir V., 1993. Complex verb phrase: a diachronic and synchronie view, in M. K. Verma (éd.), . Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages, Delhi, Manohar,p.77-96. Garcia E. & van Putte F., 1989, Forms are silver, nothing is gold, Folia Unguistica Historica VUl-1-2, p. 365-Ц. Genetti C, 1986, The grammatical developpment of postpositions to subordinators inLinguistics Bodic languages, Society, BSL, Proceeding p. 387 ^300 of the 12th annual meeting of the Berkeley

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 252 Faits de langues

Genetti G, 1994, A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect. Monumenta Serindiça 24, Tokyo, ILCAA. Gesang J., 1982, Zangyu dongci de shidong fanchou. Beijing, Minzu yuyan. Gesang J., 1987, shiyong zang wen wen fa, si chuan спиЪап shi. Ghatage A. M, 1965-69, A Survey ofMarathi Dialects, Jmrt П, 1965, KudàT, part ШГ1966, KudabîofMahàd, part VU, 1969, War/ offhand), Bombay, The State Board for Literature and Culture. Gil D., 1993, Conjunctive operators: areal phenomenon or semantic universal, Eurotyp Working Papers /(Studies in Number and Quantification), p. 18-47. Goldstein M. Ç. & Nornang N., 1970, Modern Spoken Tibetan : Lhasa Dialect, Seattle, University of Washington Press. Goldstein M. C. & Nornang N., 1979, Tibétain, manuel de langue parlée (Trad. française de Modem Spoken Tibetan par Sylvie Carteron), Paris, Ed. Kagyu Dzong. GoldsteinKathmanduL M. G, Rama 1975, PustakTibetan-English Bhandar. Dictionary of Modem Tibetan (rééd. 1983), Goldstein M. С., 1984, English-Tibetan Dictionary of Modem Tibetan, Berkeley, GoshUniversity A., 1994, of CaliforniaSantali : Press.A Look into Santal Morphology, New Delhi, Gyan Publishing House. Goswami T., 1985, Kuki life and Lore, Haflong, , North Cachar Hills Distria Council. Greenberg J. H (dir.), 1963, Universals of Language, Cambridge (Mass.), МГГ Press. Grierson G. A.,1967 [19031, Linguistic Survey of India. Vol. Ill, Part II: Tibeto- Burman Family, Delhi- Varanasi-Patna, Moulai Banarsidas. Grierson G., 1988 [19051, Linguistic survey of India, vol. VH — Indo- Aryan Family. Southern Group, Specimens of the Maràjhï language, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Gross G., 1996, Prédicats nominaux et compatibilité aspectuelle, Langages 121, p. 54-72. Gross M., 1990, Les limites de la phrases figées, Langages 88, p. 7-22. Gruessner K.-H., 1978, Arleng Alam, aie Sprache der Mikir, Beitràge zur Siidasienforschung,Steiner/Wiesbaden. Sudasien Institut universitat Heidelberg, Во 39, Gsell R., à paraître, The consonantal system of sommon rromani : a Diasystemic Approach, A Reader in Rromani Linguistics, Vol. I, Paris. GueptehevaEd.duC.tf.R.S. Z., 1990, Temps et aspect : l'exemple du bulgare contemporain, Paris, Guillaume G., 1929г Temps et verbe. Pans, Champion, 2e éd. 1965. Gumperz J. J. & Wilson к., 1971, Convergence and creolization : A case from the mdo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India, in Dell R Hymes (éd.), Pidginizotion and

iput iv o., rtuui /v, oc /-vgvaiwai jv.o. veus.j, a^^j, iuihku Perspectives on the EightnSchedule, New-Delhi, Creative B< Gurov N. V., à paraître, Syntactic Constructions with the 'Quotative' Marker in the Languages of South Asia, in Proceedings of the Moscow Conference on South Asian Languages, Jul. 1997. Hacker P.. 1958, Zur Funktion einiger Hilfsverben im modern Hindi, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse, 4. Hagègein Ungua G, 1984, e stile Sur I a.les XDC, trois n° structurations 3,p. 349-379. de l'énoncé dans les langues humaines, Hagège G, 1995, La structure des tangues, Paris, PUF, 'Que sais-je?'.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 253

Hale A., 1973, Clause, sentence and discourse patterns in selected languages of Nepal, part iy. Word lists, SIL, Norman, Okla. Haudncourt A.-G., 1950, Les consonnes préglottalisées en Indochine, BSLP 46-1, p. 172-182. Heine В., 1993, Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaricalization, New York/Ôxford, Oxford Univ. Pr. Henderson E. J. A., 1957, Colloquial Chin as a Pronominalized Language, BSOAS 20, p. 323-328. Henderson E. J. A.. 1965, The topography of certain phonetic and morphological features of South-East Asian languages, lingua 15, p. 400-434. HerbertPapers Y.My in Linguistics 1983, Noun 8.2. p.and 31-81. verb in a Salishan language, Kansas Working Herring& M. S. Noonan С & Paolillo (eds.). J.,Word 1995, Order Focus in position Discourse, in SOV Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Languages, in P. Downing John Benjamins, p. 163-198. Hockings P. et Pilot-Raichoor C, 1992, A Badaga-English Dictionary, Berlin - New York, Mouton de Gniyter. Hodgson B. R, 1848, Aborigines of Central India, JASB 2. Hoffman J., 1903, Mundari Grammar, Calcutta, Bengal Secretariat Press. Hciok P. E., 1974, The Compound Verb in Hindi, Ann Arbor, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan. HuTan, 1989, Lasa коиуи duben, Beijing, Minzu Chubanshi. Huttonthe J.H.,ChangNagas, 1987, Chang (1929), Language, reedfS.Mukhopadhyay, Grammar and Vocabulary Delhi, GianTubl.House. ofthe Language of Isačenko A. v ., 1960, Grammatiçceskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim, Bratislava. Israel M., 1979, A Grammar of the Kuvi Language (With Text and Vocabulary), Trivandrum, India, Dravidian Linguistics Association. Jacobson W. H. Jr., 1979, Noun and verb in Nootkan, in B. S. Erfat (éd.), The Victoria Conference on Northwestern Languages, Victoria, British Columbia Provincial Museum, p. 83-153. Jha A., 1980, Kosá —A Dialect ofMarafiii, Poona, Deccan College. Jha S., 1985 [1958], The Formation of the , Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Katre S. M., 1966, The Formation ofKonkani, Poona, Deccan College. Kellogg R. S., 1972 [1875], A Grammar of the Hindi Language, Delhi, Oriental Books Reprints. Kesang Gyurmé [Cf. aussi sKal-bzang 'Gyur-med ou Gesang Jumian], 1992, Le Clair Miroir. Grammaire tibétaine. Traduction, adaptation et commentaires linguistiques par N. Tournadre et R Stoddard. Préface de Cl. Hagège, La Rochette (France), Editions Prajâa. Khader Mohiddin S., 1980, Dakhani Urdu, Annamalai Nagar, Annamalai Univ. Press. Khubchandani L. M.. 1991, Language, Culture and Nation Building : Challenges of Modernization, Shimla Institute of Advanced Studies. Khubchandani L. M., 1992, Tribal Identity: A Language and Communication Perspective, Indian Institute of Advanced Studies Shimla. Kinkadelingua M. 60,v.2530. D., 1983. Salish evidence against the universality of 'noun' and Verb',

Kittelthe K, three 1982 dialects 11903], ofthe A Grammar language ofthe (ancient, mediaeval Language and in modern), English Mangalore,comprising Basel Mission Book and Tract Depository (rééd. Delhi A.E.SÁ Klaiman M. R, 1981, Bengali Dative Subjects, lingua 51, p. 175-95. Klimov G., 1974, On the «Character of Languages of Active Typology, linguistics

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 254 Faits de langues

Kônig R, 1991, The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective, London/New York, Routledge. Konow S., 1904. Mundas and prayidas, Indian Antiquary 33. Kqpečnéy F., 1962, Slovesný vid v češtině, Prague, Rozpravy československé akademie včd, 2. Kothandaraman R., 199L Empty markers in Tamil : A new perspective, PILC Journal ofDravidian Studies, Vol. 1:2, p. 149-68. Koul O. N., 1983, Language and Education, Patiala, Indian Institute of Language Study. Krishna S., 1991, India's living Languages : The Critical Issues, Delhi, Allied Publishers. Krishnamurti Bh. (éd.), 1986, Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Krishnamurti Bh.,Bh. ™1955, Ther History" ' of Telugu Verbal Bases,' JOAS ' '75, p. 237-52.'

Krishnamurti Bh.. Cultural Research and Training Institute. Krishnamurti Bh., 1975a, Review of Kamil Zvelebil, Comparative Dravidian Phonology, Lingua 39, p. 139-153. Krishnamura Bh., 1975b, Gender and number in Proto-Dravidian, International Journal ofDravidian Linguistics 4, p. 328-350. Kuiper F. B. J., 1948, Proto-munda Words in Sanskrit, Amsterdam, Noord- Hollandsche Uitg.Mij. Kuiper F. B. J., 1955, Rig Vedic Loanwords, Studia Indologica (Festschrift fiir Willibaldkirfel), Bonn, Selbst Verlag des Orientalishen Semmars des Universitat, j). 137-185. Kuiper F. B. J., 1991, Aryans in the RigVeda, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rpdopi. KuiperpT238-61 F. B. J., 1995, A Hunt for possible objections, Indo-iranian Journal 38, Kuipers A. R, 1968, The categories verb-noun and transitive-intransitive in English and Squamish, Lingua 21, p. 610-626. Kulkami S. В., 1969, Descriptive Analysis ofKàthar, Dialect, Thèse de linguistique non publiée, Poona, Deccan College. KulkamiJournal S. (Humanities) В., 1971-72, ХХП, Powàrï 3-4, p.Bolí 1-88. (Powari Dialect), in Nagpur University Kulkami S. В., 1976, Bhili of Dangs, édité par A M. Ghatage, Poona, Deccan College. Kurylowicz J., 1953, Aspect et temps dans l'histoire du persan, repris dans Esquisses linguistiques, 1960, Wroclaw-Krakow. Polska Akademia Nauka, p. 109-118. Kurylowicz J., 1966, La Transformation des catégories grammaticales, Diogène 15, p. 51-71. Kushalappa Gowda, К., 1972, A Grammar ofKannada (Based on the inscriptions of Coorg, South Kanára and North Kanára, Dis 1000 to 1400 A.D.), Ànnamalainagar, Annamalai University. La négation : une ou multiple?, 1996, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Nouvelle série, tome Fv . Paris, Klincksieck. Laddu S. S., 1958, Marathi /d dh/ and Koli /r d/, Indian linguistics XDC, p. 137-141 (le titre comprend une coquille : il faut Ure «Marathi /d dh/ and Koli /r d/»). Laddu S. S., 1961, linguistic Analysis of Koli (A Dialect of Marathi), Thèse de linguistique non publiée, Poona, Université dePoona. Lakshmi Bai В., 19»6, A Note on syntactic convergence among Indian languages : the verb "be1, in Bh. Krishnamurti (éd.), Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 195-208

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 255

Lambrecht K., 1981, Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. LambrechtJohn Benjamins, K., 1981, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French, LangackerStandford R UniversityW., 1987, Press. 1991, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol 1 & 2, LanusosangDirectorate T., of1989, School Nagalandl Education. A Study in Social Geography, Nagaland, Kohima, LaPolla R. J., 1993, Arguments Against 'Subject' and 'Direct object' as Viable Concepts in Chinese, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica. Taipei, Taiwan. China, vol. ЬХШ, part IV. LaPollaY.Nagano R. J., 1995.(ed), 'Ergative'New Horizons marking inin Tibeto-Burman,Tibeto-Burman inMorphosyntax, Y. Nishi, J. MatisofiÇ Senn Ethnological Studies n° 41, Osaka, National museum of ethnology, p. 189-228. Launey M.. 1994, Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nanuatl classique, Paris, CNRS. Lazard G„ 1994, L'Actance, Paris, PUF. LefébvreThe Netherlands, С & Muysken Kluwar P., 1988,Academic Mixed Publications. Categories : Normalizations in Quechua, LehmannInstitute T., of Linguistics1989, A Grammarand Culture. of Modern Tamil, Pondicherry, Pondicherry Letterman R., 1997, The Effect of Word Internal Prosody in Sinhala : A Constraint- Based Approach, PhD,Tomell Univ. Lhundup S., 1983, Lectures on Tibetan Religious Culture, Vol. 1 et 2, Dharamsala (bide). Library of Tibetan Works and Arcnives. Losang Th. [ou Blo-bzang Don-ldan 1, 1980-1986, Modern Tibetan Language. (Deng dus bod kyi skad.yig), Vol 1 (1980), 2 (1986), New Delhi, Library of Tibetan Works and Archives. Martin R., 1983, Pour une logique du sens, Paris, PUF. Masicaof Chicago С. Р., 1976, press. Defining a linguistic area : South Asia, Chicago, The University MasicaPress. С. Р7 1991, The Indo-Aryan Languages, Cambridge, Cambridge University Master A., 1946, The zero negative in Dravidian, Transactions of the Philological Society (London), p. 137-155. Mazaudon M., 1973, Phonologie tamang, Selaf, Paris. Mazaudonof Tibeto-Ëurman. M., 1978, Consonantal Kailash 6-3, mutation p. 157-179. and tonal split in the Tamang subfamily McAlpin D. W., 1981, Proto Elamo-Dravidian. The Evidence and its Implications, Philadelphia, Transactions of the American Philological Society 71-3. McAlpin D. W., 1970. Comparative Dravidian Phonology, La Haye-Paris, Mouton. Michailqvsky В., 1994. Manner vs place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops, in H. Kitamura et al. (eds), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, Osaka. Michailovsky В., 1988, Phonological typology of Nepal languages, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 11-2, рЛ5-50. Miller R. A., 1976, Studies in the grammatical Tradition in Tibet (Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistics 6), Amsterdam, John Benjamins. Mistry P. J., à paraître, Déverbal Nouns in Gujarati, in Proceedings of the Moscow Cference on Soth Asian Lguages, Jul. 1997. Ii , , descriptive a Central Institute of Indian Languages. Mohanan T., 1993, Verb Agreement in Complex Predicate in Hindi, in M. K. Verma (ed). Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages, Delhi, Manohar, p. 161-176.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 256 Faits de langues

Molesworth J. T., 1991 [1857], Л Dictionary Marathi and English, 2*"* éd. Révisée at augmentée, Bombay, Bombay Education Society (reimgr. Sous le titre Molesworth's Marathi-English Dictionary, Poona, Subhadâ Sarasvat Prakàsan, Montaut A., 1991, Aspects, voix et diatheses en hindi moderne : syntaxe, sémantique, énonciation, Louvain-Paris, Ed. Peeters, coll. Bibliothèque de l'information grammaticale. Montaut A., 1994, Réflexivation et focalisation en hindi moderne, BSL LXXXDC, p. 83-120. Montaut A., 1996a, Agent, cause, force et expénent en hindi, Scolia 7, p. 169-94. Montaut A., 1996b. Accord et cas : la 'postposition1 accordée en hindi, Faits de langues 8. p. 141-50. Montaut A., 1996c, La Genèse des systèmes accompli et futur en indo-aryen, Journal Asiatique 284. p. 325-60. Montaut À., 1997, Le hindi en 1947 : la question de la langue nationale, ses origines et ses conséquences. Cahiers du Sahib 5, p. 133-51. Mukherjee A., 1996, Language Maintenance and Language Shift. Punjabis and Bengalis in Delhi, Delhi, Bahri Publications. Nadaraja Pillai N.. 1992, A Syntactic Study of Tamil Verbs, CIIL Doctoral dissertations series-3, Mysore, CUL. Nadkami M. V., 1975, Bihngualism and Syntactic Change in Konkani, Language 51-3, p. 672-83. Nagano Y., 1995^ A Morphological Index of Classical Tibetan, Seishido, Tokyo. Nagano Y., 1995b, Functions of a written Tibetan instrumental particle kyis, revisited, in Y. Nishi7 J. Matisoff, Y. Nagano (ed). New Horizons in Tibeto- Burman Syntax, Senn Ethnological Studies n° 4i, Osaka, National museum of ethnology, p. 133-141. Nagaraja K. S., 1993, Korku and LA: A Case of Convergence, PILC Journal of Dravidian Studies, Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture, 3/2. Nespital ft, 1975, Zur syntaktiscfien Verwendung der Verbalaspekte im Hindi und Urdu, Zeitschrift ftir Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsfor- s^w* 28: 34 p. 398-431. Nespital ft, 1980, Zur Aufstellung eines Seminyentars der Tempuskategorie im Hindi und Urdu und zu seiner Charakteristik, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft (ZDMG) 130-3. p. 490-521. NespitaT ft, 1981, Das Futursystem im Hindi und Urdu. Ein Beitrag zur semantischen Analyse der Kategorien Tempus, Aspekt und Modus unaihrer Grammeme, Schrinenreihe des Siidasien-Instituts der Universitat Heidelberg (Vol. 29). Nespital ft, 1982, Zur Kategorie des Verbalaspekts im Indoarischen, Zeitschrift der Deutschensupplément V,Morgenlàmischen XXI, Deutscher Orientalistentag Gesellschaft Murz(ZDMG) 1980 Berlin:[Numéro Ausgewâhlte spécial, Vortruge, sous la dir. de Fr. Steppat], p. 253-26/. Nespital H, 1989, Verbal aspect and lexical semantics in bido-Aryan languages: the typology of verbal expressions ("compound verbs") and their relation to simple verhs/Studien zurlnaologie und Iranistifc, 15, p. 159-196. Nespital ft, 1996a, The use of non-perfective simple verbs and of perfective verbal expressions ("compound verbs'") in New Indo-Aryan languages: grammatical, lexical and pragmatic criteria for their selection, in D. B. Kapp (éd.), Nânâ-

Sprachen und Literaturen (Vol. 3), p. 184-202. Nespital H., 1996b, Verbal aspect in Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages. The relation of simple verbs to verbal expressions ("compound verbs '), Berliner Indologische Studien (BIS) 9/10, p. 247-258.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 257

Nespital H., 1997, HindTKriy s Koš / Dictionary of Hindi Verbs, sous presse. Nisni Y., Matisoff J. A. & Nagano J. (eds.), 1995, New Horizons in Tibeto-Burman Morphosyntax, Senri Ethnological Studies n°41, Osaka, National Museum of Ethnology. Ojha T., 198/, Pramukh bihsri boliyd kîtulnâtmak adhyayan (Grammaire comparée des principaux parlers du Bihar), Benares, Vishvavidyalay Prakashan. Pandit P. В., 1977, Language in Plural Society, Delhi, DevRaj Chanana Memorial Committee. Paramasivam К., 1979, Effectivity and Causativity in Tamil, Dravidian Linguistics Association, Trivandrum. Paris C, 1991, Diasvstème et longue durée, in Linguistique aréale et recherches comparatives, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Nouvelle série, tome L Paris, Klincksieck. Patil B. Cnandrashekar, 1973, The verb be in Kannada, Department of linguistics, Pilot-RaichoorThe University Ch., of 1991, Leeds, LeLeeds baqaga (UK) langue dravidienne (Inde): description et analyse, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de la Sorbonne-Nouvelle - Paris Ш. Pilot-Raichoor Ch., 1997, Expression des valeurs 'moyennes' dans trois langues dravidiennes, Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata XXVI-2, p. 381- Pilot-406. Raichoor Çh., à paraître, L'expression des valeurs moyennes dans trois langues dravidiennes, Silta (Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata), sous presse. Pinnow H. J., 1966, A Comparative Study of the Verb in the Munda Languages, in N. H. Zide (éd.), Studies in Comparative Austro-Asiatic Linguistics, London-The Hague, Mouton. Pischef R., 1981 Г19001, A Grammar of Prakrit Languages, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass [trad, de láli.]. Plank F. (edX 1985, Relational Typology, Berlin-Amsterdam-New York, Mouton. Pobožniak T., 1949, Liquid Sounds in the Gypsy Language, in Rocznik Orientalistyczny. Pobožniak T., 1964, Grammar of the Lovari Dialect, Cracovie, PWN. Pořízka V., 1967-69, On the perfective verbal aspect in Hindi (Some features of parallelism between New Indo-Aryan and Slavonic languages), Archiv Orientální 35, p. 64-88 et 208-231; 36, p. 233-251; 37, p. 19^7 et 345-364. Pottier В., 1984, L'opposition verbo-nominale n'est pas un phénomène primaire, Modèles Linguistiques VI. 1, p. 61-65. PrabhakaraVararKJW.,of Madras Malayalam 1979,series. Studies ' in Maloyalam grammar, Madras, University Prakash R, 1975, Verb Morphology in Middle Indo-Aryan, Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal. Rai N. K., 1985, A Descriptive Study ofBantawa, These, Poona, Deccan College. Rajam V. S., 1992, A Reference Grammar of Classical Tamil Poetry (150 B.B.-pre- Mh/ sixth century A.D.), Philadelphie, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society volume 199. * Rajyashree K. S.. 1980, Standardization of Language : A Case Study ofMarathi, Thèse non publiée, Université de Mysore. Rajyashree К. S., 1994, Consequences of Printing on Standardization of Marathi, in G.Academic S. Rao Foundation,(éd.). Language p. 45-60. Change : Lexical Diffusion and Literacy, Delhi, Ramanujan A. K. & Masica C, 1969, Toward a phonological typology of the Indian linguistic area, in T. A. Sebeok (ed), Current Trends in Linguistics 5: Linguistics in South Asia, p. 543-577. Ramaswami Aiyar M. A., 1938, The Morphology of the Old Tamil Verb, Anthropos ХХХШ, p. 747-781.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 258 Faits de langues

Ramaswami N.. 1992, Bhumij Grammar, Mysore, Central Institute of Indian Languages. Grammar Series 18. Rao N., 1985, SaV as a quotative marker: evidence for convergence in Kannada and Marathi, ŠALA 7, p. 269-82. Renou L., 1953, L'Inde Classique, t.2, Hanoï, Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient [rééd. Maisonneuve]. Rose Mary A., 1989, Negative Formation in Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada and Telugu : À Comparative Study, in Gopinathan Nair (éd.), Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Dravidian Linguistics &the Fourteenth All India Conference of Dravidian Linguists, Trivandrum, International School of Drayidian Linguistics. Sambasiva Rao G., 1973, On Proto-Dravidian Morphophonemics, IJDL 2, p. 217-

Sampson 1, 1926, The Dialect of the Gypsies of Wales, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Sapir Б.. 1921 Language, New York, Harcourt Brace. Sarâu Gh., 1991, Umba romani, Bucuresti, Ministerul învâçâmântului. Sarâu Gh., 1995, Culegere de texte Un limba (igâneascâ, Bucure$ti, Ministerul învà{amântului. Sardeshpande MajG. S. С, 1987, The PathoiNagas, Delhi. Daya. Saxena A., 1980, The Affected Agent, Languageb64, p. 812-26. Saxena A., 1982, Contact in Causation, Language 584 p. 820-31. Saxena R. В., 1937 [19711, Evolution ofAwadhi, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Schiffinan К 1979, A Reference Grammar of the Kannada Language. Schiffinan H..1991, Tamil .complex negation revisited, in Lakshmi Bai, В. & Reddy, В. A. (eds.) Festschrift for Ш Krishnamurti. Hyderabad, Osmania University,.p. 186-197. Seiler H, 1981, Possession as an operational dimension of language, Kôln, akup. Shafer R, 1955, Classification of me Sino-tibetan languages, Word 11, p. 94-111. Shanmugam S. V., 1971, Dravidian Nouns : A Comparative Study, Annainalaina- gar, Annamalai University. Shapiro M. & Schiffinan RTF., 1981, Language and Society in South Asia, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Shapiro M., 1976, The Analysis of Hindi Morphologically Related Verb ets, Indian Linguistics 17-1, p. 1-44. ShastrrK. G., 1971, The Havyaka Dialect of North Kanára, Dharwad. Shreedhar M. V., 1975, Nagq Pidgin : A Sociolinguistic Study of Inter-Lingual Communication Pattern in Nagaland, Mysore, Central Institute of Indian Languages. Singh K.S. & Manoharan S., 1993, Languages and Scripts. People of India, v. X, Delhi, Anthropological Survey of India and Oxford University Press. South worth F. C. & Apte M. L. (eds.), 1974, Contact and convergence in South Asian languages. International Journal of Drayidien Linguistics (DDL) 1-3. Southworth F. C, 1971, Detecting prior Creolization : An Analysis of the Historical Origins of Marathi. in D. Hymes (éd.), Pidginisation and Creolixation of Languages, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. Spinelli S., 1994, Princkardng, Lanciano, Italica. Steever В., 1980. Sanford, Noun incorporation in Tamil, or What's a noun like you doing in a verb like this?, in Selected papers in Tamil and Dravidian linguistics, Madurai, p. 109-128. Steever S. В., 1987, The Serial Verb Formation in the Dravidian Languages, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi. Steever S. В., 1993, Analysis to Synthesis, The Development of Complex Verb MorphologyPress. in the Dravidian Languages, New York-Oxford, Oxford University

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access Bibliographie générale 259

Subbaiah G., 1985, Grammar of Kota, Annamalai Nagar, India, Annamalai University. SubrahmanyaTiruvach. Sastri P. S., 1947, Comparative Grammar of the Tamil Language,

SubrahmanyamJournal of Annamalai P. S., 1969? University The gender26, r>. 79-100. and number categories in Dravidian, Subrahmanyam P. S., 1976, Review of Bh. Krishnamurti's Gender and Number in Proto-Dřavidian, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 5, p. 138-143. SubrahmanyamAnnamalai Nagar, P. S. Annamalai1971, Dravidian Univ Press Verb n° Morphology. 24. A coniparatve Study, Subrahmanyam P.S7 1968, A Descriptive Grammar of Gondi, Annamalai Nagar, India, Annamalai University. Sun (enHongkai chinois). & al., 1980, The languages of the Monpa, luopa, and Deng. Beijing, Suryavanshi R, 1989, Khmdešátl Krsak Jivan Visayak Sabdavql,ce Bhâsâvaijnmik Adhyoyan [Etude linguistique du vocabulaire de la vie des paysans du Khandesh], Thèse de linguistique non publiée, Nagpur, Université de Nagpur. Swadesh M., 1938, Nootka Internal Syntax, International Journal of American Linguistics 9, p. 77-102. Tagare G. V., 1987 [1948], Historical Grammar of Apabramsha, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. Takeuchi T. & Takahashi Y., 1995, Split ergative patterns in transitive and intransitive sentences, New Horizons m Tibeto-Burman Morphosyntax, Osaka, National Museum of ethnology. Thurgpod G., 1985г Pronouns, verb agreement systems, & the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman, m G. Thurgood, J. A. Matisoff, & D. Bradley (eds), Linguistics ofAustralian the Sino-Tibetan National University,Area: the p.State 376^00. of the Art, (=Pacific Xinguistics C-87), Tiwari K. M., 1995, Language Deprivation among the socially disadvantaged in Bihar, IJDL. p. 8-81 ^ Tiwari U. N.. 1966, The Development ofBhojpuri, Calcutta, The Asiatic Society. Tournadre N., 1990, Présentation de la grammaire traditionnelle et des cas du tibétain. Approche classique et analyse moderne, in Tibet, Civilisation et Société, Paris, Editions de la Fondation Singer-Polignaç. Tournadre N., 1991, The Rhetorical Use of the Tibetan Ergative, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14 / 1, Berkeley, University of California, p. 93-108. Tournadre N., 1992, Critique de la notion de cas en tibétain, exposé dans le cadre de Consola à Paris Ш. Tournadre N., 1994, Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de Langues 3, p. 149-58 Tournadre N., 1995 Tibetan Ergativity and the Trajectory Model, in Y. Nishi, J.National A. Matisoff, Museum Y. Naganoof Ethnology. (edsX New Horizons in Tibeto-Burman Syntax, Osaka, Tournadre N., 1996a, De l'ablatif à l'ergatif en passant par le causatif, in La sémantique des relations actancielles à travers les langues, Scolia n°7, J. François (MX Université de Strasbourg 2, p. 221-236. Tournadre N., 1996b, L'ergativité en tibétain, approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée, Louvain, Teeters. Tsunoda T, 1981, Spfit Case Marking Patterns in Verb Types and Tense/aspect/mood, Linguistics 19, p. 389438. Tsunoda T, 1985. Remarks on Transitivity, Journal of Linguistics 21, p. 385-96. TurnerBSOS R, 3-2,L., 1924. p. 301-315. The Sindhi recursives or voiced stops preceded by glottal closure, Turner R. L., 1927, The Position of Romani in Indo-Aryan, London, Gypsy Lore Society Monographs Nr. 4. Ultsiferov O. G., Г979, Hindrměkriys. Ek vyâkaraçik anusandhsn, Dillï.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access 260 Faits de langues

Vacek J., 1995, Lexical Features of the Indian Linguistic Area, PILC Journal of Dravidic Studies 5-1, p. 17-28. Van Eijk J. P. & Hess T., 1986, Noun and Verb in Salish, Lingua 69, p. 319-331. Varfjadpande V., 1972, Nagpur, Bol. BhâsàsMstrfy Abhyâs [La langue de Nagpur: Etuae linguistique]^ Nagpur, Imdirâ PrakâÀan. Vasil'kov la. V. & Gurov N., 1995, Strara Aratta po dreynim pis'mennym istocnikam, Vestnk Vostocnogo Institute, Acta lnstituionis Orientalis 1-1, p. 12- 66. Venkateswara Sastry J and Krishnamurthy N.D., 1975, Coversational Telugu, Madras. Verma M. K. & Mohanan K.P., 1991, Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages, Stanford, The Stanford Linguistics Association. VermaIndia M. as K., a linguistic1991, Exploring area revisited, the parameters Language of Sciences agreement. 13-2. The case of Magahi, Verma M. K., 1993, Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages, Delhi, Manohar. Wali K. & Koul O.N., 1997, Kashmiri, A Cognitive-Descriptive Grammar, Londres, Routledge. Wang zhil, 1994a, Zangyu lasa kouyu yufa, Beijing, Minzu daxue chubanshi. Wang zhi J., 1994b. Study of Tibetan Gerund, Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics,v. 709-715. Zbavitel D., 1970,Non-finite Verbal Forms in Bengali, Prague. Oriental Institute. Zribi-Hertz A., 1990a, Lui-même argument et le concept de pronom A1, Langages Zribi-Hertz97, p. 100-127. A., 1990b, xNP lui-même, in G. fQeiber & J.E.Tyvaert (éds.), L'Anaphore et ses domaines, Recherches Linguistiques XTV, p. 377-402. Zvelebil К. V., 1967, On Morpho-phonemic Rules of Dravidian Bases, Linguistics 32, p. 21742. Zvelebil К. V„ 1970,Comparative Dravidian Phonology, La Haye-Paris, Mouton. ZvelebU К. V,, 1982, The Irula (ERLA) language, part Ш, Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz. Zvelebil К. V., 1984, Dravidian Linguistics To-day, Journal of Asian Studies 2-1 Madras, p. 1-40. Zvelebil К. v., 1990, Dravidian Linguistics. An Introduction, Pondicherry, Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.

Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 08:09:52AM via free access