DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Fungi in Ireland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Fungi in Ireland FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix Dedications .............................................................................................................xi General history of edible mushrooms ...............................................................1 The biology of fungi..............................................................................................3 Classification of fungi.........................................................................................19 Conservation of wild fungi and woodland management to promote fungi .......................................................................................................23 Finding, using and preserving wild edible mushrooms..............................25 Poisonous mushrooms ........................................................................................37 Agaricus xanthodermus Yellow-staining mushroom...........................40 Amanita muscaria Fly agaric..........................................................42 Amanita pantherina Panther cap......................................................44 Amanita phalloides Death cap .........................................................46 Amanita virosa Destroying angel.............................................48 Boletus calopus Red-stalked bolete (Bitter beech bolete)......50 Cortinarius species Web caps .........................................................52 Cortinarius rubellus (speciosissimus) Tawny web cap ...............................................54 Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca False chanterelle..............................................56 Paxillus involutus Brown roll rim.................................................58 Russula species Brittle gill .........................................................60 Russula emetica The sickener ...................................................62 Russula mairei Beechwood sickener .....................................64 ii Mushrooms best avoided ...................................................................................67 Agaricus augustus The prince........................................................68 Amanita rubescens The blusher......................................................70 Boletus luridus Lurid bolete .....................................................72 Clitocybe nebularis Clouded agaric................................................74 Clitocybe odora Aniseed agaric.................................................76 Laetiporus sulphureus Chicken of the woods ....................................78 Macrolepiota rhacodes Shaggy parasol................................................80 Mycena pura Lilac bonnet (radish mushroom)..................82 Phallus impudicus Stinkhorn .........................................................84 Pleurotus cornucopiae Branching oyster mushroom .......................86 Polyporus squamosus Dryad’s saddle ................................................88 Russula cyanoxantha Charcoal burner ............................................90 Sarcoscypha coccinea Scarlet elf cup ..................................................92 Tricholomopsis rutilans Plums and custard..........................................94 Edible mushrooms...............................................................................................97 Agaricus essettei Large-bulbed mushroom ............................100 Agaricus langei Red-staining wood mushroom...................102 Agaricus silvicola Wood mushroom ..........................................104 Amanita fulva Tawny grisette ..............................................106 Armillaria mellea Honey fungus ...............................................108 Auricularia auricula-judae Jelly ear/Jew’s ear fungus ...........................110 Boletus badius Bay bolete ......................................................112 Boletus edulis Penny bun (cep, porcini, steinpilze)...........114 Cantharellus cibarius Chanterelle (girolle)......................................116 Cantharellus tubaeformis Winter/Yellow leg chanterelle ...................118 Clitocybe flaccida Tawny funnel cap .........................................120 Clitocybe geotropa Monk’s head..................................................122 Clitocybe infundibulformis Common funnel cap.....................................124 Coprinus comatus Shaggy ink cap/Lawyer’s wig ...................126 Craterellus cornucopioides Horn of plenty...............................................128 Cuphophyllus niveus Snowy wax cap .............................................130 iii Cuphophyllus pratensis Meadow wax cap..........................................132 Fistulina hepatica Beefsteak fungus...........................................134 Flammulina velutipes Velvet shank ..................................................136 Handkea excipuliformis Pestle puffball................................................138 Hydnum repandum White hedgehog fungus .............................140 Hydnum rufescens Reddening hedgehog fungus ....................142 Laccaria amethystina Amethyst deceiver ......................................144 Laccaria laccata Brown deceiver ............................................146 Lactarius deliciosus Pine saffron milk cap ..................................148 Lactarius deterrimus Spruce saffron milk cap ..............................150 Langermannia gigantea Giant puffball .........................................152 Leccinum scabrum Brown birch bolete .......................................154 Leccinum versipelle Orange birch bolete......................................156 Lepista nuda Wood blewit .................................................158 Lepista saeva Field blewit....................................................160 Lycoperdon perlatum Common puffball ........................................162 Lycoperdon pyriforme Stump/Pear-shaped puffball......................164 Macrolepiota (Lepiota) procera Parasol mushroom ......................................166 Morchella elata Tall (black) morel .........................................168 Pleurotus ostreatus Grey oyster mushroom ...............................170 Sparassis crispa Cauliflower/Brain fungus ..........................172 Suillus (Boletus) bovinus Bovine bolete.................................................174 Suillus grevillei Yellow larch bolete .......................................176 Suillus luteus Slippery jack/Pine bolete ............................178 Suillus aeruginascens (viscidus) Dirty white larch bolete...............................180 Tricholoma gambosum St George’s mushroom ...............................182 Tuber aestivum Summer truffle..............................................184 References and recommended reading..........................................................187 Appendix 1 ..........................................................................................................189 An illustrated glossary of technical terms A table of fruit body characteristics iv Appendix 2 ..........................................................................................................192 Dichotomous key to the genera of fungi named in this book Tabular keys to the genera of fungi in this book (Tabkeys) Appendix 3 ..........................................................................................................198 A key to common Irish trees in summer A key to common Irish trees in winter Fungus/tree associations Tree identification photographs Appendix 4 ..........................................................................................................210 List of recorded occurrences of forest fungi in this book Table of fungal distribution Calendar of wild edible Irish mushrooms Index .....................................................................................................................219 v FOREWORD Once found only in speciality shops, edible
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita
    1170 Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita I5ichael Weiß, Zhu-Liang Yang, and Franz Oberwinkler Abstracl A group of 49 Amanita species that had been thoroughly examined morphologically and amtomically was analyzed by DNA sequence compadson to estimate natural groups and phylogenetic rclationships within the genus. Nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit were determined and evaluated using neighbor-joining with bootstrap analysis, parsimony analysis, conditional clustering, and maximum likelihood methods, Sections Amanita, Caesarea, Vaginatae, Validae, Phalloideae, and Amidella were substantially confirmed as monophyletic groups, while the monophyly of section Lepidell.t remained unclear. Branching topologies between and within sections could also pafiially be derived. Stbgenera Amanita an'd Lepidella were not supported. The Mappae group was included in section Validae. Grouping hypotheses obtained by DNA analyses are discussed in relation to the distribution of morphological and anatomical chamcters in the studied species. Key words: fungi, basidiomycetes phylogeny, Agarrcales, Amanita systematics, large subunit rDNA, 28S. R6sum6 : A partir d'un groupe de 49 esp,ces d'Amanita prdalablement examinees morphologiquement et anatomiquement, les auteurs ont utilisd la comparaison des s€quences d'ADN pour ddfinir les groupes naturels et les relations phylog6ndtiques de ce genre. Les sdquences de I'ADN nucl6aire codant pour une partie de la grande sous-unit6 ribosomale ont 6t6 ddterminEes et €valu6es en utilisant l'analyse par liaison en lacet avec le voisin (neighbor-joining with bootstrap), l'analyse en parcimonie, le rcgroupement conditionnel et les m€thodes de ressemblance maximale. Les rdsultats confirment substantiellement les sections Afiarira, Caesarea, Uaqinatae, Ualidae, Phalloideae et Amidella, comme groupes monophyldtiques, alors que la monophylie de la section Lepidella demerxe obscure.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Patients with Amanita Phalloides Poisoning CASE SERIE
    CASE SERIE 353 Four patients with Amanita Phalloides poisoning S. Vanooteghem1, J. Arts2, S. Decock2, P. Pieraerts3, W. Meersseman4, C. Verslype1, Ph. Van Hootegem2 (1) Department of hepatology, UZ Leuven ; (2) Department of gastroenterology, AZ St-Lucas, Brugge ; (3) General Practitioner, Zedelgem ; (4) Department of internal medicine, UZ Leuven. Abstract because they developed stage 2 hepatic encephalopathy. With maximal supportive therapy, all patients gradually Mushroom poisoning by Amanita phalloides is a rare but poten- improved from day 3 and recovered without the need for tially fatal disease. The initial symptoms of nausea, vomiting, ab- dominal pain and diarrhea, which are typical for the intoxication, liver transplantation. They were discharged from the can be interpreted as a common gastro-enteritis. The intoxication hospital between 6 to 10 days after admission. can progress to acute liver and renal failure and eventually death. Recognizing the clinical syndrome is extremely important. In this case report, 4 patients with amatoxin intoxication who showed the Discussion typical clinical syndrome are described. The current therapy of amatoxin intoxication is based on small case series, and no ran- Among mushroom intoxications, amatoxin intoxica- domised controlled trials are available. The therapy of amatoxin intoxication consists of supportive care and medical therapy with tion accounts for 90% of all fatalities. Amatoxin poison- silibinin and N-acetylcysteine. Patients who develop acute liver fail- ing is caused by mushroom species belonging to the gen- ure should be considered for liver transplantation. (Acta gastro- era Amanita, Galerina and Lepiota. Amanita phalloides, enterol. belg., 2014, 77, 353-356). commonly known as the “death cap”, causes the majority Key words : amanita phalloides, mushroom poisoning, acute liver of fatal cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Common Macrofungi in Eastern Forests and Their Ecosystem Functions
    United States Department of Field Guide to Agriculture Common Macrofungi Forest Service in Eastern Forests Northern Research Station and Their Ecosystem General Technical Report NRS-79 Functions Michael E. Ostry Neil A. Anderson Joseph G. O’Brien Cover Photos Front: Morel, Morchella esculenta. Photo by Neil A. Anderson, University of Minnesota. Back: Bear’s Head Tooth, Hericium coralloides. Photo by Michael E. Ostry, U.S. Forest Service. The Authors MICHAEL E. OSTRY, research plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN NEIL A. ANDERSON, professor emeritus, University of Minnesota, Department of Plant Pathology, St. Paul, MN JOSEPH G. O’BRIEN, plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, St. Paul, MN Manuscript received for publication 23 April 2010 Published by: For additional copies: U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 April 2011 Fax: (740)368-0152 Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ CONTENTS Introduction: About this Guide 1 Mushroom Basics 2 Aspen-Birch Ecosystem Mycorrhizal On the ground associated with tree roots Fly Agaric Amanita muscaria 8 Destroying Angel Amanita virosa, A. verna, A. bisporigera 9 The Omnipresent Laccaria Laccaria bicolor 10 Aspen Bolete Leccinum aurantiacum, L. insigne 11 Birch Bolete Leccinum scabrum 12 Saprophytic Litter and Wood Decay On wood Oyster Mushroom Pleurotus populinus (P. ostreatus) 13 Artist’s Conk Ganoderma applanatum
    [Show full text]
  • SOMA News March 2011
    VOLUME 23 ISSUE 7 March 2011 SOMA IS AN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO MYCOLOGY. WE ENCOURAGE ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS BY SHARING OUR ENTHUSIASM THROUGH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND GUIDED FORAYS. WINTER/SPRING 2011 SPEAKER OF THE MONTH SEASON CALENDAR March Connie and Patrick March 17th » Meeting—7pm —“A Show and Tell”— Sonoma County Farm Bureau Speaker: Connie Green & Patrick March 17th—7pm Hamilton Foray March. 19th » Salt Point April April 21st » Meeting—7pm Sonoma County Farm Bureau Speaker: Langdon Cook Foray April 23rd » Salt Point May May 19th » Meeting—7pm Sonoma County Farm Bureau Speaker: Bob Cummings Foray May: Possible Morel Camping! eparated at birth but from the same litter Connie Green and Patrick Hamilton have S traveled (endured?) mushroom journeys together for almost two decades. They’ve been to the humid and hot jaguar jungles of Chiapas chasing tropical mushrooms and to EMERGENCY the cloud forests of the Sierra Madre for boletes and Indigo milky caps. In the cold and wet wilds of Alaska they hiked a spruce and hemlock forest trail to watch grizzly bears MUSHROOM tearing salmon bellies just a few yards away. POISONING IDENTIFICATION In the remote Queen Charlotte Islands their bush plane flew over “fields of golden chanterelles,” landed on the ocean, and then off into a zany Zodiac for a ride over a cold After seeking medical attention, contact and roiling sea alongside some low flying puffins to the World Heritage Site of Ninstints. Darvin DeShazer for identification at The two of them have gazed at glaciers and berry picked on muskeg bogs. More than a (707) 829-0596.
    [Show full text]
  • Agaricus Campestris L
    23 24 Agaricus campestris L.. Scientific name: Agaricus campestris L. Family: Agaricaceae Genus: Agaricus Species: compestris Synonyms: Psalliota bispora; Psalliota hortensis; Common names: Field mushroom or, in North America, meadow mushroom. Agaric champêtre, Feldegerling, Kerti csiperke, mezei csiperke, Pink Bottom, Rosé de prés, Wiesenchampignon. Parts used: Cap and stem Distribution: Agaricus campestris is common in fields and grassy areas after rain from late summer onwards worldwide. It is often found on lawns in suburban areas. Appearing in small groups, in fairy rings or solitary. Owing to the demise of horse-drawn vehicles, and the subsequent decrease in the number of horses on pasture, the old "white outs" of years gone by are becoming rare events. This species is rarely found in woodland. The mushroom has been reported from Asia, Europe, northern Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and North America (including Mexico). Plant Description: The cap is white, may have fine scales, and is 5 to 10 centimetres (2.0 to 3.9 in) in diameter; it is first hemispherical in shape before flattening out with maturity. The gills are initially pink, then red-brown and finally a dark brown, as is the spore print. The 3 to 10 centimetres (1.2 to 3.9 in) tall stipe is predominantly white and bears a single thin ring. The taste is mild. The white flesh bruises a dingy reddish brown, as opposed to yellow in the inedible (and somewhat toxic) Agaricus xanthodermus and similar species. The thick-walled, elliptical spores measure 5.5–8.0 µm by 4–5 µm. Cheilocystidia are absent.
    [Show full text]
  • AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING in NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 by Michael W
    VOLUME 57: 4 JULY-AUGUST 2017 www.namyco.org AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING IN NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee Assessing the degree of amatoxin mushroom poisoning in North America is very challenging. Understanding the potential for various treatment practices is even more daunting. Although I have been studying mushroom poisoning for 45 years now, my own views on potential best treatment practices are still evolving. While my training in enzyme kinetics helps me understand the literature about amatoxin poisoning treatments, my lack of medical training limits me. Fortunately, critical comments from six different medical doctors have been incorporated in this article. All six, each concerned about different aspects in early drafts, returned me to the peer reviewed scientific literature for additional reading. There remains no known specific antidote for amatoxin poisoning. There have not been any gold standard double-blind placebo controlled studies. There never can be. When dealing with a potentially deadly poisoning (where in many non-western countries the amatoxin fatality rate exceeds 50%) treating of half of all poisoning patients with a placebo would be unethical. Using amatoxins on large animals to test new treatments (theoretically a great alternative) has ethical constraints on the experimental design that would most likely obscure the answers researchers sought. We must thus make our best judgement based on analysis of past cases. Although that number is now large enough that we can make some good assumptions, differences of interpretation will continue. Nonetheless, we may be on the cusp of reaching some agreement. Towards that end, I have contacted several Poison Centers and NAMA will be working with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Trametes
    TAXON 60 (6) • December 2011: 1567–1583 Justo & Hibbett • Phylogenetic classification of Trametes SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Phylogenetic classification of Trametes (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) based on a five-marker dataset Alfredo Justo & David S. Hibbett Clark University, Biology Department, 950 Main St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Alfredo Justo, [email protected] Abstract: The phylogeny of Trametes and related genera was studied using molecular data from ribosomal markers (nLSU, ITS) and protein-coding genes (RPB1, RPB2, TEF1-alpha) and consequences for the taxonomy and nomenclature of this group were considered. Separate datasets with rDNA data only, single datasets for each of the protein-coding genes, and a combined five-marker dataset were analyzed. Molecular analyses recover a strongly supported trametoid clade that includes most of Trametes species (including the type T. suaveolens, the T. versicolor group, and mainly tropical species such as T. maxima and T. cubensis) together with species of Lenzites and Pycnoporus and Coriolopsis polyzona. Our data confirm the positions of Trametes cervina (= Trametopsis cervina) in the phlebioid clade and of Trametes trogii (= Coriolopsis trogii) outside the trametoid clade, closely related to Coriolopsis gallica. The genus Coriolopsis, as currently defined, is polyphyletic, with the type species as part of the trametoid clade and at least two additional lineages occurring in the core polyporoid clade. In view of these results the use of a single generic name (Trametes) for the trametoid clade is considered to be the best taxonomic and nomenclatural option as the morphological concept of Trametes would remain almost unchanged, few new nomenclatural combinations would be necessary, and the classification of additional species (i.e., not yet described and/or sampled for mo- lecular data) in Trametes based on morphological characters alone will still be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Amanita  3Huv ,1/80%,1,=21( Nepal
    THE GENUS AMANITA 3HUV ,1/80%,1,=21( NEPAL Hari Prasad Aryal * and Usha Budhathoki ** 3DNOLKDZD&DPSXV,QVWLWXWHRI$JULFXOWXUHDQG$QLPDO6FLHQFH%KDLUDKDZD &HQWUDO'HSDUWPHQWRI%RWDQ\7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\.LUWLSXU.DWKPDQGX1HSDO Abstract: 'XULQJWKHVXUYH\RIZLOGHGLEOHPXVKURRPVLQWURSLFDOWRWHPSHUDWHEHOWRI1HSDOGXULQJUDLQ\VHDVRQVLQ DQGPDQ\PDFURIXQJDOVSHFLHVZHUHFROOHFWHGDQGLGHQWL¿HG7KHSDSHUKLJKOLJKWVRQWKH¿YHVSHFLHVRI genus Amanita 3HUVLQFOXGLQJQHZVSHFLHV Amanita volvata 3HFN /OR\G ZLWKWKHLULGHQWL¿FDWLRQDQGGRFXPHQWDWLRQ The new species was LGHQWL¿HGDQGWKLVLVEHLQJUHSRUWHGDQGUHGHVFULEHGIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHIURP1HSDO Amanita characterized by stipe with volva or rudiments of volva, annulus present, in some may be absent, clamp connection SUHVHQWRUDEVHQWVSRUHVDP\ORLGRULQDP\ORLG7KHVWXG\DUHDRFFXSLHGVTNPDPRQJWKHVT.PODQG DQGOLHVZLWKLQDQDOWLWXGHEHWZHHQDQGPDVOLQWURSLFDOGHFLGXRXVULYHULQHIRUHVWWRORZHUWHPSHUDWHPL[HG EURDGOHDYHGIRUHVW7KHGULHGVSHFLPHQVDUHKRXVHGLQWKH7ULEKXYDQ8QLYHUVLW\&HQWUDO+HUEDULXP 78&+ .LUWLSXU .DWKPDQGX1HSDO7KHDUHDHPEUDFHVPDQ\P\FRSKDJRXVHWKQLFFRPPXQLWLHV7KHP\FRHOHPHQWVSUHYDLOLQJLQWKLV DUHDQHHGVXVWDLQDEOHFRQVHUYDWLRQDQGXWLOL]DWLRQ Keywords: Tasonomy; %DVLGLRP\FHWHV Amanita volvata; 0DFURIXQJL INTRODUCTION 7KH LQYHVWLJDWLRQ DQG VWXG\ RQ PXVKURRPV RI 1HSDO started since 19 th FHQWXU\ /OR\G %HUNHOH\ 7KH JHQXV Amanita FRQWDLQV RYHU QDPHG VSHFLHV DQG YDULHWLHV $GKLNDUL et al Amanita IURP1HSDOKDVEHHQUHSRUWHGVLQFH th century (Singh, DE VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDOSDSHUVKDYHEHHQSXEOLVKHG 42 species and 2 subspecies of Amanita are reported IURP1HSDO $GKLNDUL et al VLQFHWKHQVHYHUDO
    [Show full text]
  • Mycoparasite Hypomyces Odoratus Infests Agaricus Xanthodermus Fruiting Bodies in Nature Kiran Lakkireddy1,2†, Weeradej Khonsuntia1,2,3† and Ursula Kües1,2*
    Lakkireddy et al. AMB Expr (2020) 10:141 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01085-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Mycoparasite Hypomyces odoratus infests Agaricus xanthodermus fruiting bodies in nature Kiran Lakkireddy1,2†, Weeradej Khonsuntia1,2,3† and Ursula Kües1,2* Abstract Mycopathogens are serious threats to the crops in commercial mushroom cultivations. In contrast, little is yet known on their occurrence and behaviour in nature. Cobweb infections by a conidiogenous Cladobotryum-type fungus iden- tifed by morphology and ITS sequences as Hypomyces odoratus were observed in the year 2015 on primordia and young and mature fruiting bodies of Agaricus xanthodermus in the wild. Progress in development and morphologies of fruiting bodies were afected by the infections. Infested structures aged and decayed prematurely. The mycopara- sites tended by mycelial growth from the surroundings to infect healthy fungal structures. They entered from the base of the stipes to grow upwards and eventually also onto lamellae and caps. Isolated H. odoratus strains from a diseased standing mushroom, from a decaying overturned mushroom stipe and from rotting plant material infected mushrooms of diferent species of the genus Agaricus while Pleurotus ostreatus fruiting bodies were largely resistant. Growing and grown A. xanthodermus and P. ostreatus mycelium showed degrees of resistance against the mycopatho- gen, in contrast to mycelium of Coprinopsis cinerea. Mycelial morphological characteristics (colonies, conidiophores and conidia, chlamydospores, microsclerotia, pulvinate stroma) and variations of fve diferent H. odoratus isolates are presented. In pH-dependent manner, H. odoratus strains stained growth media by pigment production yellow (acidic pH range) or pinkish-red (neutral to slightly alkaline pH range).
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological and Pharmacological Profile of Amanita Muscaria (L.) Lam
    Pharmacia 67(4): 317–323 DOI 10.3897/pharmacia.67.e56112 Review Article Toxicological and pharmacological profile of Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam. – a new rising opportunity for biomedicine Maria Voynova1, Aleksandar Shkondrov2, Magdalena Kondeva-Burdina1, Ilina Krasteva2 1 Laboratory of Drug metabolism and drug toxicity, Department “Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy and Toxicology”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Magdalena Kondeva-Burdina ([email protected]) Received 2 July 2020 ♦ Accepted 19 August 2020 ♦ Published 26 November 2020 Citation: Voynova M, Shkondrov A, Kondeva-Burdina M, Krasteva I (2020) Toxicological and pharmacological profile of Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam. – a new rising opportunity for biomedicine. Pharmacia 67(4): 317–323. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.67. e56112 Abstract Amanita muscaria, commonly known as fly agaric, is a basidiomycete. Its main psychoactive constituents are ibotenic acid and mus- cimol, both involved in ‘pantherina-muscaria’ poisoning syndrome. The rising pharmacological and toxicological interest based on lots of contradictive opinions concerning the use of Amanita muscaria extracts’ neuroprotective role against some neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, its potent role in the treatment of cerebral ischaemia and other socially significant health conditions gave the basis for this review. Facts about Amanita muscaria’s morphology, chemical content, toxicological and pharmacological characteristics and usage from ancient times to present-day’s opportunities in modern medicine are presented. Keywords Amanita muscaria, muscimol, ibotenic acid Introduction rica, the genus had an ancestral origin in the Siberian-Be- ringian region in the Tertiary period (Geml et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruiting Body Form, Not Nutritional Mode, Is the Major Driver of Diversification in Mushroom-Forming Fungi
    Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi Marisol Sánchez-Garcíaa,b, Martin Rybergc, Faheema Kalsoom Khanc, Torda Vargad, László G. Nagyd, and David S. Hibbetta,1 aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610; bUppsala Biocentre, Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75005 Uppsala, Sweden; cDepartment of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; and dSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved October 16, 2020 (received for review December 22, 2019) With ∼36,000 described species, Agaricomycetes are among the and the evolution of enclosed spore-bearing structures. It has most successful groups of Fungi. Agaricomycetes display great di- been hypothesized that the loss of ballistospory is irreversible versity in fruiting body forms and nutritional modes. Most have because it involves a complex suite of anatomical features gen- pileate-stipitate fruiting bodies (with a cap and stalk), but the erating a “surface tension catapult” (8, 11). The effect of gas- group also contains crust-like resupinate fungi, polypores, coral teroid fruiting body forms on diversification rates has been fungi, and gasteroid forms (e.g., puffballs and stinkhorns). Some assessed in Sclerodermatineae, Boletales, Phallomycetidae, and Agaricomycetes enter into ectomycorrhizal symbioses with plants, Lycoperdaceae, where it was found that lineages with this type of while others are decayers (saprotrophs) or pathogens. We constructed morphology have diversified at higher rates than nongasteroid a megaphylogeny of 8,400 species and used it to test the following lineages (12).
    [Show full text]