DOCSLIB.ORG

Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae Sl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae Sl Blumea 55, 2010: 189–195 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE doi:10.3767/000651910X527699 Three new species and a new name in Southeast Asian Gomphandra (Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae s.l.) M. Schori1, T.M.A. Utteridge2 Key words Abstract Three new species of Gomphandra (Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae s.l.) are described from Malesia, and a new name is proposed for a misidentified species. Gomphandra palustris is known from peat swamp forests Gomphandra in Borneo, Sarawak, G. halconensis is known from the Philippines, Mindoro, Mt Halcon, and G. conklinii from the Icacinaceae Philippines, Ifugao Province, Banaue. Gomphandra rarinervis is offered as a new name for Stemonurus puberulus, new species which was incorrectly synonymised with G. papuana by Sleumer. This commonly collected taxon is known from Southeast Asia Madang and Morobe Provinces in Papua New Guinea and does not overlap in distribution with G. papuana. Stemonuraceae Stemonurus Published on 20 August 2010 INTRODUCTION Gomphandra Wall. ex Lindl. is a genus of approximately 65 species of small trees and shrubs distributed from Sri Lanka and India to China, Indo-China, and throughout Southeast Asia to the Solomon Islands. The genus was revised by Sleumer in 1969 prior to its inclusion in Flora Malesiana (Sleumer 1971). Although it was traditionally placed in Icacinaceae, Kårehed (2001) provided evidence that the family is polyphyletic and placed Gomphandra in the segregate family Stemonuraceae. Gomphandra is the largest genus in the family, with 33 species previously recognized (Sleumer 1969) and approximately 30 new taxa. The genus is characterized by functionally dioecious flowers, a large sessile stigma, and fruit with longitudinal inner mesocarp ridges. Other genera in the family that share these characteristics also have laterally compressed fruit, usually with a fleshy lateral appendage, both of which are absent in Gom- a phandra. The site of appendage attachment may correspond to a distinctive pair of ridges and grooves flanking a central ridge on one side of the inner mesocarp in Gomphandra, a feature we refer to as a sulcus because the immediate impression is of a b groove on the inner mesocarp (Fig. 1). The term ‘pseudohilum’ Fig. 1 Sulcus. a. The stigma is displaced toward a pair of parallel grooves was considered for this feature, but it has already been used (emphasized here as thick black lines) divided by a ridge, all of which is here referred to as a sulcus. The longitudinal ribs of the inner mesocarp are to refer to a feature of the seeds of Sapindaceae (Weckerle & visible to either side; b. sulcus in profile. The thick black bars correspond to Rutishauser 2005). The sulcus is not visible in fresh fruit but can the thick lines shown in the lateral view. The ridges and grooves of the sulcus be pronounced on dried mature fruits, though the ridges vary are not more prominent than those of the longitudinal ridges in this species in prominence depending upon the species. Sleumer (1971) (G. luzoniensis, Reynoso et al. PPI 17155). — Scale bars = 1 cm. and others referred to the endocarp being ridged, but the ridges represent sclerified bundles of the inner mesocarp. (1969), but he did not choose to describe them at the time. Very Many species of Gomphandra have a poor collection record, few additional specimens have been collected since, and it is and a few are known only from the type collection. Ideally, a unlikely that more material will be collected in the future, as all new species publication would include descriptions of pistillate three species described below are probably either extinct or flowers, staminate flowers, and mature fruit. However, for the critically endangered by habitat loss. poorly known species of Gomphandra, complete reproductive material is usually lacking. Nonetheless, new species can be described if their morphologies are distinctive enough to 1. Gomphandra palustris Schori, sp. nov. — Fig. 2; Map 1 preclude confusion with previously described taxa. Two of the Arbor ad 25 m alta. Folia coriacea, ovata-ellipsoidea ad obovata vel fere species described below were recognized as new by Sleumer orbiculata, 5.6–13.0 cm longa, 2.6–6.7 cm lata, nervis secundariis 4–5(–6) utrinque, desuper impressis, superioribus ante marginem confluentibus. 1 Department of Environmental & Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH Inflorescentiae ignotae. Infructescentiae cymosae, ramis primariis usque 45701, USA; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]. quatuor, axillares aut terminales. Fructus 1.9–2.1 cm longi, 0.9 cm lati, 2 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK. ellipsoidei sed latissimi in partem superiorem; putamen protrusum ultra © 2010 Nationaal Herbarium Nederland You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. 190 Blumea – Volume 55 / 2, 2010 excentricum stigma, valde porcatum. — Typus: Haji Bujang S.30259 (holo pubescence. Fruit obovate-ellipsoid, widest in upper half, apex A; iso K, L), Malaysia, Sarawak, 3rd Division, Batang Igan, Sungai Tutus and base rounded, 1.9–2.1 by 0.9 cm, glabrous; subtended by Logging Camp, 6 Sept. 1970. persistent calyx 3 mm diam; inner mesocarp with c. 7 strong Small tree to 25 m high and 40 cm diam; trunk fluted (to 2 m) or longitudinal ridges, stigma distinctly eccentric in dried fruit, 3 mm not. Twigs pubescent with minute, somewhat appressed hairs diam, facing away from sulcus. when young, eventually becoming glabrescent, 1.5–3.0 mm Distribution — Only from Borneo, Sarawak. diam, terminal buds falcate, densely covered with light brown Habitat & Ecology — Only collected from (peat) swamp pubescence. Leaves coriaceous, ovate-elliptic to obovate or forests at low elevations up to 3 m. almost orbicular, frequently conduplicate, apex acute to shortly Field notes — Bark smooth to narrowly longitudinally fissured and abruptly acuminate, base acute, lamina shortly decurrent with a somewhat scabrous surface, grey or pale yellowish grey, onto the petiole, margin flat to slightly revolute, glabrous above inner bark orange. Fruit pinkish white, orangey-pink, or yellow- when mature, sparsely pubescent along the veins below, shin- ish grey. ing above when dried, matte below, 5.6–13.0 by 2.6–6.7 cm; Notes — Gomphandra palustris is distinguished by its midrib sunken above, raised below, secondary veins 4–5(–6) rounded, coriaceous leaves with impressed brochidodromous pairs, impressed above, weakly brochidodromous with the up- veins, and its strongly ridged, asymmetrical fruit. It is not similar per pairs joining 1–2 mm from the margin, concolorous above, to any other species in Borneo and is probably most closely darker than the leaf surface below and raised, tertiary veins related to the Philippine G. luzoniensis (Merr.) Merr. group, generally not visible above, ± raised below, percurrent and whose members have a similar infructescence structure, fruit perpendicular to the midrib; petioles grooved, initially tomen- size and colour. All collections, to date, are fruiting specimens tellous but glabrescent with age, 1.0–2.5 cm by 1.0–1.6 mm. collected from June through October. On specimens with im- Inflorescences and flowers not known. Infructescences with mature fruit, the young ovaries are strongly cylindrical, with no up to 5 fruits developing (out of perhaps 12 or more flowers), evident asymmetry. either terminal on sympodial branches, or axillary, when axillary, most often on the older, naked portion of the twigs, cymose with 2–3 degrees of branching, up to 4 branches borne on a common peduncle to 1.5(–2.0) cm long, branches to 1.2 cm long, fruit sessile or on short pedicels when more than one fruit develops per branch, all axes and calyx with minutely appressed b Fig. 2 Gomphandra palustris Schori. a. Habit of twig with fruit; b. fruit, sulcus not visible (Haji Bujang S.30259). — Scale bars = 1 cm. a M. Schori & T.M.A. Utteridge: Three new species of Gomphandra 191 magnification). Leaves coriaceous, lanceolate-elliptic to ovate, mostly oblanceolate-elliptic, apex acuminate to caudate with an acumen c. 7 mm long, sometimes with a short mucro formed by the tip of the midrib, base acute, margins revolute, apparently glabrous, pale yellowish brown when dried, 5.5–9.0 by 2.0–3.5 cm; midrib slightly impressed above, raised below, secondary veins 4–8 pairs, flat or not evident above, scarcely evident below, brochidodromous, intersecondaries common, tertiary veins not evident on mature leaves; petiole grooved, 9–15 by 1.1–1.5 mm. Inflorescences unknown, probably borne on new flushes of growth. Infructescences with 2–5 fruits in a very reduced cyme, axillary, on previous season’s growth, peduncle 1–2 cm long, pedicels 1.5–5.0 mm long, glabrescent. Fruit glo- bose, slightly asymmetrical, glabrous, 1.0–1.3 by 0.8–0.9 cm; subtended by the persistent cupular calyx 2.0–2.5 mm diam; inner mesocarp with c. 12 faint ribs, stigma discoid, c. 2 mm diam, eccentric. Distribution — Endemic to the Philippines, restricted to Mt Halcon on Mindoro. Habitat & Ecology — On a ridge at 1 200 m, in a forest domi- nated by gymnosperms and Tristania, on gravel/sand, possibly from a quartz base, and from cloud forest at 1 350 m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Lists of the Vascular Plant Families with Their Phylogenetic
    Colligo 2 (1) : 3-10 BOTANIQUE Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers Listes alphabétiques des familles de plantes vasculaires avec leurs numéros de classement phylogénétique FRÉDÉRIC DANET* *Mairie de Lyon, Espaces verts, Jardin botanique, Herbier, 69205 Lyon cedex 01, France - [email protected] Citation : Danet F., 2019. Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Colligo, 2(1) : 3- 10. https://perma.cc/2WFD-A2A7 KEY-WORDS Angiosperms family arrangement Summary: This paper provides, for herbarium cura- Gymnosperms Classification tors, the alphabetical lists of the recognized families Pteridophytes APG system in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms Ferns PPG system with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Lycophytes phylogeny Herbarium MOTS-CLÉS Angiospermes rangement des familles Résumé : Cet article produit, pour les conservateurs Gymnospermes Classification d’herbier, les listes alphabétiques des familles recon- Ptéridophytes système APG nues pour les ptéridophytes, les gymnospermes et Fougères système PPG les angiospermes avec leurs numéros de classement Lycophytes phylogénie phylogénétique. Herbier Introduction These alphabetical lists have been established for the systems of A.-L de Jussieu, A.-P. de Can- The organization of herbarium collections con- dolle, Bentham & Hooker, etc. that are still used sists in arranging the specimens logically to in the management of historical herbaria find and reclassify them easily in the appro- whose original classification is voluntarily pre- priate storage units. In the vascular plant col- served. lections, commonly used methods are systema- Recent classification systems based on molecu- tic classification, alphabetical classification, or lar phylogenies have developed, and herbaria combinations of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species and a New Name in Southeast Asian <I>Gomphandra
    Blumea 55, 2010: 189–195 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE doi:10.3767/000651910X527699 Three new species and a new name in Southeast Asian Gomphandra (Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae s.l.) M. Schori1, T.M.A. Utteridge2 Key words Abstract Three new species of Gomphandra (Stemonuraceae / Icacinaceae s.l.) are described from Malesia, and a new name is proposed for a misidentified species. Gomphandra palustris is known from peat swamp forests Gomphandra in Borneo, Sarawak, G. halconensis is known from the Philippines, Mindoro, Mt Halcon, and G. conklinii from the Icacinaceae Philippines, Ifugao Province, Banaue. Gomphandra rarinervis is offered as a new name for Stemonurus puberulus, new species which was incorrectly synonymised with G. papuana by Sleumer. This commonly collected taxon is known from Southeast Asia Madang and Morobe Provinces in Papua New Guinea and does not overlap in distribution with G. papuana. Stemonuraceae Stemonurus Published on 20 August 2010 INTRODUCTION Gomphandra Wall. ex Lindl. is a genus of approximately 65 species of small trees and shrubs distributed from Sri Lanka and India to China, Indo-China, and throughout Southeast Asia to the Solomon Islands. The genus was revised by Sleumer in 1969 prior to its inclusion in Flora Malesiana (Sleumer 1971). Although it was traditionally placed in Icacinaceae, Kårehed (2001) provided evidence that the family is polyphyletic and placed Gomphandra in the segregate family Stemonuraceae. Gomphandra is the largest genus in the family, with 33 species previously recognized (Sleumer 1969) and approximately 30 new taxa. The genus is characterized by functionally dioecious flowers, a large sessile stigma, and fruit with longitudinal inner mesocarp ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladaceae
    Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladaceae
    Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa
    Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species, Cyrtandra Bungahijau and C. Vittata, and Notes on Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) from Yapen Island, Indonesia
    KEW BULLETIN (2019) 74: 29 ISSN: 0075-5974 (print) DOI 10.1007/S12225-019-9817-2 ISSN: 1874-933X (electronic) Two new species, Cyrtandra bungahijau and C. vittata, and notes on Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) from Yapen Island, Indonesia H. J. Atkins1, C. D. Heatubun2,3,4, L. Galloway1 & G. L. C. Bramley2,5 Summary. Two new species of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) are described; one apparently endemic to Yapen Island, Tanah Papua, the other present in Tanah Papua and in Papua New Guinea: both species are described and illustrated, and preliminary conservation assessments given. Notes on the identity of other known collections of Cyrtandra from Yapen are provided. Key Words. New Guinea, Papua New Guinea. Introduction Cyrtandra J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. is a large genus of c. 800 Guinea (Schumann & Lauterbach 1901; Lauterbach species of herbs, shrubs, climbers, and small trees 1910; Moore 1916). Clarke’s monograph of Cyrtandra (Atkins et al. 2013). It is a predominantly Southeast (Clarke 1883) across its distribution, only recognised Asian genus and is found from the Nicobar Islands in five species and one variety from New Guinea. the Indian Ocean, throughout Malesia, in Taiwan and Schlechter (1923) divided 87 of the 96 Cyrtandra the southern Japanese islands, in northern Australia species he recognised into two subgenera and 14 and east across Polynesia to Hawaii. It is recorded on sections, leaving nine unplaced, four of which were the Asian continent only as far north as central only noted as being new and not formally described. Thailand. Its centres of diversity are New Guinea and The subgenera were distinguished by corolla Borneo (each with over 100 species) and the Philip- morphology; sections generally by combinations of pines (with over 80 species) (Atkins et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Survey of Vascular Plant in the Submontane Forest of Mt
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 20, Number 8, August 2019 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 2197-2205 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200813 Short Communication: Floristic survey of vascular plant in the submontane forest of Mt. Burangrang Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia TRI CAHYANTO1,♥, MUHAMMAD EFENDI2,♥♥, RICKY MUSHOFFA SHOFARA1, MUNA DZAKIYYAH1, NURLAELA1, PRIMA G. SATRIA1 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology,Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Jl. A.H. Nasution No. 105, Cibiru,Bandung 40614, West Java, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-22-7800525, email: [email protected] 2Cibodas Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institute of Sciences. Jl. Kebun Raya Cibodas, Sindanglaya, Cipanas, Cianjur 43253, West Java, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-263-512233, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 1 July 2019. Revision accepted: 18 July 2019. Abstract. Cahyanto T, Efendi M, Shofara RM. 2019. Short Communication: Floristic survey of vascular plant in the submontane forest of Mt. Burangrang Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20: 2197-2205. A floristic survey was conducted in submontane forest of Block Pulus Mount Burangrang West Java. The objectives of the study were to inventory vascular plant and do quantitative measurements of floristic composition as well as their structure vegetation in the submontane forest of Nature Reserves Mt. Burangrang, Purwakarta West Java. Samples were recorded using exploration methods, in the hiking traill of Mt. Burangrang, from 946 to 1110 m asl. Vegetation analysis was done using sampling plots methods, with plot size of 500 m2 in four locations. Result was that 208 species of vascular plant consisting of basal family of angiosperm (1 species), magnoliids (21 species), monocots (33 species), eudicots (1 species), superrosids (1 species), rosids (74 species), superasterids (5 species), and asterids (47), added with 25 species of pterydophytes were found in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM History Of
    ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae, Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woody Planet: from Past Triumph to Manmade Decline
    plants Review The Woody Planet: From Past Triumph to Manmade Decline Laurence Fazan 1, Yi-Gang Song 2,3 and Gregor Kozlowski 1,3,4,* 1 Department of Biology and Botanical Garden, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Eastern China Conservation Center for Wild Endangered Plant Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Chenhua Road No.3888, Songjiang, Shanghai 201602, China; [email protected] 3 Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chenhua Road No.3888, Songjiang, Shanghai 201602, China 4 Natural History Museum Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 6, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-26-300-88-42 Received: 6 November 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 17 November 2020 Abstract: Woodiness evolved in land plants approximately 400 Mya, and very soon after this evolutionary invention, enormous terrestrial surfaces on Earth were covered by dense and luxurious forests. Forests store close to 80% of the biosphere’s biomass, and more than 60% of the global biomass is made of wood (trunks, branches and roots). Among the total number of ca. 374,000 plant species worldwide, approximately 45% (138,500) are woody species—e.g., trees, shrubs or lianas. Furthermore, among all 453 described vascular plant families, 191 are entirely woody (42%). However, recent estimations demonstrate that the woody domination of our planet was even greater before the development of human civilization: 1.4 trillion trees, comprising more than 45% of forest biomass, and 35% of forest cover disappeared during the last few thousands of years of human dominance on our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific
    Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific Craig Costion School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA 5005 Thesis by publication submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology July 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis advances plant biodiversity knowledge in three separate bioregions, Micronesia, the Queensland Wet Tropics, and South Australia. A systematic treatment of the endemic flora of Micronesia is presented for the first time thus advancing alpha taxonomy for the Micronesia-Polynesia biodiversity hotspot region. The recognized species boundaries are used in combination with all known botanical collections as a basis for assessing the degree of threat for the endemic plants of the Palau archipelago located at the western most edge of Micronesia’s Caroline Islands. A preliminary assessment is conducted utilizing the IUCN red list Criteria followed by a new proposed alternative methodology that enables a degree of threat to be established utilizing existing data. Historical records and archaeological evidence are reviewed to establish the minimum extent of deforestation on the islands of Palau since the arrival of humans. This enabled a quantification of population declines of the majority of plants endemic to the archipelago. In the state of South Australia, the importance of establishing concepts of endemism is emphasized even further. A thorough scientific assessment is presented on the state’s proposed biological corridor reserve network. The report highlights the exclusion from the reserve system of one of the state’s most important hotspots of plant endemism that is highly threatened from habitat fragmentation and promotes the use of biodiversity indices to guide conservation priorities in setting up reserve networks.
    [Show full text]
  • DDC) Stemming from the Adoption of the APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) III Classification As the Basis for the DDC’S Treatment of Flowering Plants
    This PDF documents proposed changes throughout the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) stemming from the adoption of the APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) III classification as the basis for the DDC’s treatment of flowering plants. We request comment from any interested party, to be sent to Rebecca Green ([email protected]) by 31 January 2016. Please include “Angiosperm review comments” in your subject line. -------------------------------------------------------------- Why is the DDC adopting a new basis for classifying angiosperms (flowering plants)? During the latter half of the 20th century, biological classification turned from establishing taxa predominantly on the basis of morphological similarities to establishing taxa predominantly on the basis of shared ancestry / shared derived characters, with biological taxonomies mirroring evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic analysis typically underlies modern evolutionary classifications, but has resulted in the development of many competing classifications. Within the domain of flowering plants, different classification systems have been favored in different countries. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, a global consortium of botanists, has addressed this issue by developing a “consensus” classification that is monophyletic (i.e., its taxa include all but only the descendants of a common ancestor). Now in its third version, the APG III classification is considered relatively stable and useful for both research and practice (e.g., for organizing plants in herbaria). The development for flowering plants presented here is the culmination of DDC editorial work over a span of several years. An early version revised 583–584 to make the schedule compatible with the APG III classification, while trying to minimize relocations and using see references to establish the APG III logical hierarchy.
    [Show full text]