As of 1 May 2003)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

As of 1 May 2003) Appendix E to the Report E-1 APPENDIX E STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SADIS (as of 1 May 2003) Note. — Non-operational users are indicated in italics. Note. — Non-operational users are indicated in italics. No. ICAO Contracting State User Location Operational 1. Afghanistan National Meteorological Service Kabul Airport X 2. Algeria National Meteorological Service Dar-El-Beida X 3. Armenia Hydromet Yerevan Airport X 4. Austria Austro Control Vienna X 5. Azerbaijan Air Navigation Service Baku Airport X 6. Bahrain Civil Aviation Authority Bahrain International Airport X 7. Bangladesh National Meteorological Service Dhaka Airport X 8. Belgium Belgocontrol Brussels Airport X Belgium Eurocontrol Brussels X 9. Benin National Meteorological Service Cotonou International Airport X 10. Botswana National Meteorological Service Gaborone Airport X 11. Bulgaria Air traffic services Sofia Airport X 12. Burkina Faso National Meteorological Service Ouagadougou Airport X Burundi National Meteorological Service 13. Cameroon National Meteorological Service Douala Airport X Central African Republic National Meteorological Service 14. Chad National Meteorological Service N’Djamena Airport X 15. China CAAC Beijing Airport X China CAAC Guangzhou Airport X China Observatory Kowloon X China Observatory Kowloon X China Civil Aviation Authority Macau Airport X 16. Congo National Meteorological Service Brazzaville Airport X 17. Côte d'Ivoire National Meteorological Service Abidjan Airport X 18. Croatia Air traffic services Zagreb Airport X 19. Cyprus National Meteorological Service Nicosia X 20. Czech Republic HydroMet Prague X 21. Democratic People’s Civil Aviation Authority Pyongyang Airport X Republic of Korea 22. Democratic Republic of the National Meteorological Service Kinshasa Airport X Congo 23. Denmark Meteorological Institute Copenhagen X Denmark SAS Airline Copenhagen X 24. Egypt National Meteorological Service Cairo Airport X 25. Equatorial Guinea National Meteorological Service Malabo Airport X Eritrea National Meteorological Service E-2 SADISOPSG/8 No. ICAO Contracting State User Location Operational 26. Estonia National Meteorological Service Tallinn Airport X Estonia National Meteorological Service Tallinn X 27. Ethiopia National Meteorological Service Addis Ababa Airport X Ethiopia Ethiopian Airlines Addis Ababa Airport X 28. Finland Air Navigation Services Vantaa Airport X (Civil Aviation Authority) Finland Air Navigation Services Tampere Airport X (Civil Aviation Authority) Finland Civil Aviation Authority Vantaa Airport X 29. Gabon National Meteorological Service Libreville Airport X 30. Gambia National Meteorological Service Banjul Airport X 31. Georgia National Meteorological Service Tbilisi Airport X 32. Germany EuroWings Dortmund Airport X Germany Lufthansa Frankfurt Airport X Germany UKW Baiersdorf X 33. Ghana National Meteorological Service Accra Airport X 34. Greece National Meteorological Service Piraeus Airport X Greece National Meteorological Service New Athens International X and Civil Aviation Authority Airport 35. Guinea National Meteorological Service Conakry Airport X 36. Hungary National Meteorological Service Budapest X Hungary Hungaro Control Ferihegi Airport X 37. India National Meteorological Service New Delhi X Iran (Islamic Republic of) National Meteorological Service 38. Italy Air traffic services Milan Malpensa Airport X Italy Ingegnaria Software Industriale Latina X Italy Air traffic services Rome Fiumicino Airport X 39. Jordan National Meteorological Service Queen Alia Airport X 40. Kenya National Meteorological Service Nairobi Airport X Kenya National Meteorological Service Mombasa Airport X 41. Kuwait National Meteorological Service Kuwait X 42. Lao People’s Democratic Hydromet Unit Laos Airport X Republic 43. Lebanon National Meteorological Service Beirut Airport X Libyan Arab Jamahiriya National Meteorological Service Tripoli 44. Madagascar National Meteorological Service Antananarivo/Ivato Airport X Malawi National Meteorological Service 45. Malaysia National Meteorological Service Kuala Lumpur Airport X 46. Maldives National Meteorological Service Male Airport X Mali National Meteorological Service 47. Malta National Meteorological Service Luqa Airport X Mauritania National Meteorological Service Nouakchott Airport 48. Mauritius National Meteorological Service Vacoas X 49. Mongolia Civil Aviation Authority Ulan Bator Airport X 50. Mozambique National Meteorological Service Maputo X Appendix E to the Report E-3 No. ICAO Contracting State User Location Operational 51. Namibia National Meteorological Service Windhoek Airport X 52. Nepal National Meteorological Service Kathmandu Airport X 53. Netherlands National Meteorological Service De Bilt X Netherlands SIGMEX Culemborg X 54. Niger National Meteorological Service Niamey Airport X Niger National Meteorological Service EAMAC Training School X 55. Nigeria National Meteorological Service Lagos Muhammed Airport X 56. Oman National Meteorological Service Salalah Airport X Oman National Meteorological Service Seeb Airport X 57. Pakistan NMS Karachi X 58. Poland Lufthansa Gdansk X 59. Portugal Air Force Alfragide X Portugal National Meteorological Service Lisbon Airport X 60. Qatar Civil Aviation Authority Doha Airport X 61. Republic of Korea National Meteorological Service Incheon Airport X 62. Republic of Moldova Air traffic services Chisinau Airport X 63. Romania Air traffic services Bucharest Airport X 64. Rwanda National Meteorological Service Kigali X 65. Saudi Arabia Saudi Airlines Jeddah Airport X Saudi Arabia Meteorological and Environment Jeddah Airport X Protection Agency (MEPA) Saudi Arabia Presidency of Meteorology and Jeddah Airport X Environemnt (PME) 66. Senegal National Meteorological Service Dakar Airport X Senegal ASECNA Headquarters, Dakar X 67. Seychelles National Meteorological Service Victoria Airport X Sierra Leone National Meteorological Service 68. South Africa Weather Bureau Pretoria X South Africa Netsys Pretoria X 69. Sri Lanka National Meteorological Service Colombo Airport X 70. Swaziland National Meteorological Service Mbabane X 71. Sweden Civil Aviation Authority Arlanda Airport X Sweden Civil Aviation Authority Sundsvall Airport X Sweden Flygprestanda Malmö X 72. Switzerland National Meteorological Service Zurich X Switzerland National Meteorological Service Zurich X Syrian Arab Republic National Meteorological Service 73. Thailand National Meteorological Service Bangkok Airport X Thailand Thai Int. Airways Bangkok Airport X The former Yugoslav National Meteorological Service Skopje Republic of Macedonia 74. Togo National Meteorological Service - Lomé X ASECNA 75. Tunisia National Meteorological Service Tunis Airport X 76. Turkey National Meteorological Service Ankara Airport X E-4 SADISOPSG/8 No. ICAO Contracting State User Location Operational 77. Turkmenistan National Meteorological Service X 78. Uganda National Meteorological Service Entebbe Airport X Ukraine Air traffic services Kyiv 79. United Arab Emirates National Meteorological Service Abu Dhabi Airport X United Arab Emirates Civil Aviation Authority Abu Dhabi Airport X United Arab Emirates Civil Aviation Authority Abu Dhabi Airport X United Arab Emirates Civil Aviation Authority Dubai Airport X 80. United Kingdom British Midland Air East Midlands Airport X United Kingdom UKMO Bracknell X United Kingdom Aviation Briefing Bristol X United Kingdom Britannia Airways Luton Airport X United Kingdom Bytron East Midlands Airport X United Kingdom WSI Malvern X United Kingdom National Meteorological Service Benson X United Kingdom Bradford University Bradford X 81. United Republic of Tanzania National Meteorological Service Dar Es Salaam X 82. Viet Nam Civil Aviation Authority Hanoi X Viet Nam National Meteorological Service Ho Chi Min City X 83. Yemen Civil Aviation Authority Sanaa Airport X 84. Yugoslavia National Meteorological Service Belgrade Airport X Yugoslavia Air traffic services Belgrade Airport X 85. Zambia National Meteorological Service Lusaka X 86. Zimbabwe National Meteorological Service Harare International Airport X — — — — — — — —.
Recommended publications
  • THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (Sample Document)
    THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (sample document) by 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Disclaimer Methodology and Assumptions Summary of Findings : Duty-Free Summary of Findings : Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary of Findings : Food & Beverage Summary Tables: Duty-Free Summary Tables: Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary Tables: Food & Beverage Airport Profiles : Argentina – Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 Airport Profiles : Australia – Sydney Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Melbourne Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Selected Australian Airports Airport Profiles : Austria – Vienna International Airport Airport Profiles : Bahrain – Bahrain International Airport Airport Profiles : Belgium – Brussels Airport Airport Profiles : Bulgaria – Sofia Airport Airport Profiles : Canada – Airports of Canada Airport Profiles : Canada – Ottawa International Airport The Airport Commercial Sales Benchmarking Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Airport Profiles : Canada – Toronto Pearson International Airport Airport Profiles : Chile – Arturo Benitez International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Beijing Capital International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shanghai Airports Airport Profiles : Costa Rica – Airports of Costa Rica Airport Profiles : Croatia – Dubrovnik Airport Airport Profiles : Croatia – Franjo Tuđman Airport Zagreb Airport Profiles : Czech Republic - Václav Havel Airport Prague Airport Profiles
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Development
    Page 1 of 12 25 July 2010 No. 885 DEV Published biweekly – available by annual subscription only – www.mombergerairport.info Editorial office / Subscriptions; Phone: +1 519 833 4642, e-mail: [email protected] Managing Editor / Publisher: Martin Lamprecht [email protected] News Editor: Paul Ellis [email protected] – Founding Editor: Manfred Momberger Copyright © 2010 – Momberger Airport Information by Air Trans Source Inc. – published since 1973 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT (Southern Europe) ITALY Fondi Italiani per le Infrastrutture SGR SpA (F2i) has initiated discussions with Ferrovial SA regarding acquiring a controlling stake in GE.S.A.C. S.p.A., the operator of Naples- Capodichino Airport (#883.OPS1). Reuters reported that F2i’s Board has asked CEO Vito Gamberale to discuss the airport deal, valued at EUR 150 to 200 million, with Ferrovial. The Spanish company holds a 65% stake in Capodichino Airport through BAA Airports Ltd. It intends to sell non-core assets such as Naples Airport to repay its massive debt, reported to be GBP 1.54 billion. “There are various interested parties in the airport and we are studying their proposals,” a source close to BAA’s parent company Ferrovial said. #885.1 Officials at Bologna Airport have begun a call of bids for the remodelling of the passenger terminal. An announcement was made in the European Union’s official gazette in order to determine which company will care for hub requalification, construction supervision, and security co-ordination during the project’s execution phase. A starting amount of EUR 21.5 million was mentioned. Work must be completed within 720 days from the assigned date.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto G
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Brussels, 25.08.2016 C(2016) 5375 final Subject: State aid SA.40197 (2016/N) – Lithuania Investment in infrastructure at Vilnius airport Sir, 1 PROCEDURE (1) On 31 December 2015, the Lithuanian authorities notified a measure concerning the modernisation of the Vilnius Airport's infrastructure (hereinafter “the measure”) after pre-notification contacts. (2) Between January and April 2016 several formal and informal contacts and information exchanges have taken place. The reply of the Lithuanian authorities to the Commission services' requests for information was received on 2 June 2016 and an update was received on 21 July 2016. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE 2.1 The beneficiary Vilnius airport/Lietuvos Oro Uostai (3) Since 1 July 2014, the operation of the three Lithuanian airports Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga has been entrusted to the State-owned company Lietuvos Oro Uostai (LUO) ("Lithuanian Airports") under the control of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The airport management company ensures account separation for the different airports. Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto g. 2 LT-01511 Vilnius LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKA Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 (4) LOU is the direct beneficiary of the notified measure. (5) The three airports complement each other in destinations covered, airlines present and passenger groups served. Vilnius airport is the main capital gateway for business and tourist travel from and to the country, Kaunas airport is focused on facilitating travel at low cost of Lithuanian nationals working/living abroad and Palanga airport provides access to the Scandinavian region using premium Scandinavian airlines for tourists and for business to and around the port city of Klaipeda.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Numbers Italian Airport Industry Association - ATI SHORT PROFILES OF AIR TECH ITALY COMPANIES Welcome to the Italian Airport Industry Association Air Tech Italy (ATI) is the leading Trade Association representing Italian companies specialized in supplying products, technologies and services for airports and air-traffic control. We are the first hub for international clients looking for top-quality Italian companies. We have divided the companies into six main segments AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION & SERVICES ENGINEERING & CONSULTANCY IT TERMINAL Main Segment: IT Numbers 17+ 14 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE PRODUCT PORTFOLIO 46 8 AIRPORTS SERVED SALES AND TECHNICAL WORLDWIDE SUPPORT CENTRES Products & Services Top Airports served • A-DCS Departure control system • Milan Malpensa MXP • A-WBS Weight and balance system • Milan Linate LIN • A-CUBE Multi CUTE Client • Gaborone GBE • A-MDS Message Distribution System • Teheran IKA • A-ODB Airport Operational Database • Istanbul IST • A-SCHED Flight Schedule • Verona Catullo VRN IT Solutions Provider for Airports, Airlines and Ground • A-FIDS Flight information display system • Rome Fiumicino FCO Handlers A-ICE provides value-added IT solutions and • A-MIS Multimedia information system • Tel Aviv TLV integrated applications to Airport, Airlines and Ground • A-SCP Security check point • A-HDB Handling database • Bangkok BKK Handlers, with specific experience in the implementa- • A-CAB Contract and billing • Bari BRI tion and support of mission critical systems. • BRS Baggage Reconciliation System A-ICE relies on its strong relationship with the Air • A-VMS Vehicles Maintenance System Transport community, addressing and anticipating the • CLOS Cooperative Logistics Optimization System needs as they evolve. Company associated with Via dei Castelli Romani, 59, 00071 – Pomezia (RM) ITALY Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020
    Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020 Marius Gelžinis CEO, LITHUANIAN AIRPORTS GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Passenger projections by international organizations 2031 2033 2037 x2 x2 x2 in 15 years in total % 4.9 Global 4.6% Globally 8.2bn Globally per year traffic flow per year 2037 2037 m/yr. m/yr ) +550 +661 Local 1.9 trillion bln. 2.0% ( RPK 2.3% CAGR In Europe per year In Europe per year International Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Projections by Aviation consultants, airlines and aircraft manufacturers TOP 10 aircraft orders by European airlines 2036 x2 +23 470 in 20 years 281 70 225 47 Number of aircraft 23 530 Traffic Flows 146 39 In total 41 030 144 32 2036 37 390 in 20 years 133 Aircraft 57% 25 orders 23 470 will execute orders Aircraft demand Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors do Planning to build new passenger terminals RIX TLL WAW KRK At the end of 2017, a tender In 2018 the initial plans for was launched for the 2018-2021 strategy: development of the airport visualization of the airport November 2018: master plan expansion of Tallinn Airport were launched. The terminal, with which Riga of Krakow Airport 2036 passenger terminal to be government is involved in Airport launched an approved Plėtros planai Plėtros implemented in 2018-2024 the project of development ambitious airport terminal until 2027 development project Sources: Riga Airport, 2019; Tallinn Airport, 2018; Warsaw Airport, 2018; Krakow Airport, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors
    [Show full text]
  • The Customs Posts of the Republic of Bulgaria for Defence-Related
    The customs posts of the Republic of Bulgaria for defence-related products and dual-use items and technologies have been approved by the General Director of the Customs Agency under Ministry of Finance Order No ZAM-429 of 25 June 2012 (Official Gazette 53/2012). List of customs posts on Bulgarian territory through which controlled items defence-related products and dual-use items and technologies) may leave or enter the EU customs territory Customs posts Numeric Code Code “LETISHTE BURGAS” (BURGAS AIRPORT) CUSTOMS POST 1002 BG001002 “PRISTANISHTE BURGAS TSENTAR” (BURGAS PORT CENTER) 1007 BG001007 CUSTOMS POST LESOVO CUSTOMS POST 1011 BG001011 “VARNA ZAPAD” (VARNA WEST) CUSTOMS POST 2002 BG002002 “LETISHTE VARNA” (VARNA AIRPORT) CUSTOMS POST 2003 BG002003 “PRISTANISHTE VARNA” (VARNA PORT) CUSTOMS POST 2005 BG002005 “FERIBOT VARNA” (VARNA FERRY) CUSTOMS POST 2007 BG002007 “LETISHTE PLOVDIV” (PLOVDIV AIRPORT) CUSTOMS POST 3002 BG003002 “ZH. P. SVILENGRAD” (SVILENGRAD RAILWAY STATION) CUSTOMS 3102 BG003102 POST KAPITAN ANDREEVO CUSTUMS POST 3103 BG003103 “PRISTANISHTE RUSE” (RUSE PORT) CUSTOMS PORT 4006 BG004006 ORYAKHOVO CUSTOMS POST 4203 BG004203 SVISHTOV CUSTOMS 4300 BG004300 “LETISHTE GORNA ORYAKHOVITSA” (GORNA ORYAKHOVITSA 4303 BG004303 AIRPORT) CUSTOMS POST “LETISHTE SOFIA PASSENGERS” (SOFIA AIRPORT PASSENGERS) 5106 BG005106 CUSTOMS POST “LETISHTE SOFIA CARGO” (SOFIA AIRPORT CARGO) CUSTOMS POST 5107 BG005107 GYUESHEVO CUSTOMS POST 5702 BG005702 DIMITROVGRAD CUSTOMS OFFICE – SERBIAN RAILWAYS 5802 BG005802 KALOTINA CUSTOMS POST 5804 BG005804
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Info, Bulgaria
    Info and travel hints for BBCAC-4 participants • Please kindly arrange your visa, travel schedule and report it to us now. • Please check the number of your lecture or poster and its scheduled time. • Poster size 80 cm (width) x 100 cm (height). • Plenary lectures 40 min, Power Point presentation. • Oral presentations 20 min, Power Point presentation. • Please bring a copy of your fee transfer document. • Students please bring a copy of your student status proof document. • Participants who have not made their bank transfer until now may pay cash during registration (preferably in BGN but Euro will be acceptable as well; no credit cards for registration payment). You will obtain a receipt for your payment (signed and stamped original). • You will obtain during registration a receipt for your bank transfer (signed and stamped original). • Changes in program due to late cancellations will be announced on 19 th September, Wednesday afternoon In Bulgarian Sunny Beach is "Slanchev Bryag". The conference site is just at the South part of SB, around a small river shown on map, not far from the road Burgas-Varna or Nessebar-Varna, ca. 15 km from Burgas airport Sarafovo. There are many busses Varna-SB and Varna-Burgas. http://sunnybeach-bg.com http://www.map-guide.bg/more_SunnyBeach.htm http://www.bulgariandreams.com/maps/map_sunnybeacharea.gif Airways www.hemusair.bg www.air.bg Sofia Airport www.sofia-airport.bg Burgas Airport http://www.bourgas- airport.com/l_en/index.php?PHPSESSID=3006f402c960f81f981346a516e755f8 http://www.bourgas-airport.com/l_bg/map.php
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinelle Spreads Its Wings Into New Regions
    Coccinelle spreads its wings into new regions By Hibah Noor on February, 6 2019 | Fashion, Bags & Accessories Coccinelle’s new space at Ever Rich Duty Free Plaza Neihu in Taiwan Italian leather goods brand Coccinelle has reported 30 new openings worldwide from March to December 2018 in Europe, Asia, new regions and on cruise ships. In Europe, the brand has continued to build its business with openings in Greece at Heraklion and Rhodes airports, in Italy at Cagliari and Florence airports, in the UK at London Gatwick South and North Terminals, and in Estonia at Lennart Meri Tallinn Airport. In Russia, which is described as an important and strategic region for the brand, Coccinelle has strengthened its presence with openings in Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport Terminal B, an additional location at St Petersburg Pulkovo International Airport and at St Petersburg Seaport, and two locations at Novosibirsk Tolmachevo Airport. Following the international expansion plan, the brand has announced additional openings in Asia at Ever Rich Duty Free Plaza Neihu in Taiwan, two corners at KLIA and KLIA2 in Malaysia, at Busan Duty Free Mall and Busan Seaport in South Korea, and in Cambodia at NagaCity Walk Duty Free Mall – Phnom Penh. 2018 has also seen Coccinelle entering new regions in Central America with locations at San Salvador El Salvador Airport and at Port of Spain Piarco Airport in Trinidad and Tobago. Coccinelle has added additional cruise ship listings with Starboard in Asia, with CDFG on Costa Atlantica in Asia, and one additional location onboard MSC Crociere’s MSC Seaview, in the 1 Copyright DutyFree Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016-2017 HELPLINE: +44 845 868 2708 [email protected] Amsterdam Schiphol Airport Table of Contents
    Annual Report 2016-2017 HELPLINE: +44 845 868 2708 [email protected] Amsterdam Schiphol Airport Table of Contents 4 Highlights 8 1 Programme Overview 18 2 Participation Trends 42 3 Case Studies 62 4 Key Developments In Year 8 69 5 Looking Ahead To Year 9 72 6 Carbon Performance Of Accredited Airports 90 7 Participation List 3 Annual Report 2016-2017 Airport Carbon Accreditation Highlights This Annual Report of Airport Carbon Accreditation covers Year 8 of the programme: 16th May 2016 - 15th May 2017. This has been another positive year for the programme, with participation continuing to build year-on-year. At the beginning of this reporting year there were 156 airports in the programme. Since then, a further 36 airports have joined and 3 have withdrawn, bringing the total number of airports at the end of this reporting year to 189. The following developments should be highlighted: 1. Sustained programme growth in all world regions – including at Level 3+ In programme Year 8, for the first time airports outside Europe achieved the highest accreditation status: 1 airport in North America, 5 in Asia-Pacific and 1 in Africa have been recognised as carbon neutral. Carbon neutrality in Airport Carbon Accreditation means that all the emissions under direct control of these airports have been offset, on top of the reductions that have been made. This milestone shows that carbon neutrality is an objective shared by airports worldwide, and that Airport Carbon Accreditation effectively supports airports in working towards it, and reaching it. In total, 34 airports worldwide have achieved carbon neutrality in Year 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramboll References Aviation
    RAMBOLL REFERENCES AVIATION ABU DHABI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Design & Build contract for 9 hardstands The Abu Dhabi International marking and signage. There will CUSTOMER Airport (ADIA) is undergoing a be staging areas for Ground Al Naboodah National Contracting major programme of expansion Support Equipment (GSE) and LOCATION under the management of Abu airside service roads connected Abu Dhabi Dhabi Airports Company (ADAC). to the main airside service road PERIOD As part of this expansion ADAC network.The stands are being 2013-2014 requires 9 Code E Hardstands to executed through a Design and SERVICES PROVIDED be constructed to provide relief Build procurement route and Pavement Design aircraft parking until opening of Ramboll has been appointed as AGL the new Midfield Terminal the Designer of Record by the Geotech Engineering Building in 2017. D&B contractor - Al Naboodah Structural Engineering National Contracting. Electrical, Drainage During peak periods, demand for Highway and Road Design aircraft parking stands is Besides providing the core Design Co-ordination frequently greater than the services of aviation layout, PROJECT BUDGET available number of stands, pavement design and 50.000.000 EUR leading to operational delays. infrastructural services, Ramboll will also adopt the Jet Fuel The 9 Code E Hardstands will be Hydrant and electrcal & telecom fitted with a storm water designs prepared by others., drainage system, apron flood lighting, AGL, VDGS, a fuel hydrant system, CCTV, Wi-Fi, IMAGE Abu Dhabi International Airport 38 AVIATION PROJECTS ABU DHABI AIRPORT EXPANSION Part of a $6.8bn expansion programme to increase capacity from 3.5 to 20 million passengers by 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport - a Source of Competitive Advantages of the Region
    Marketing and Branding Research 5(2018) 206-216 MARKETING AND BRANDING RESEARCH WWW.AIMIJOURNAL.COM Air Transport - A Source of Competitive Advantages of the Region Keranka Nedeva*, Evgeni Genchev Agricultural University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Trakia University - Stara Zagora ABSTRACT Keywords: This study investigates the relationship between the development of the air transport and Economic Growth, Air the economic development of the Bulgarian regions and the improvement of its Transport, Competitive competitiveness over the period of 2000–2016. The timeliness of the problem is related Advantages, Region to the contradictory impact of the air transport on the economic effects of aviation development and related socio-economic effects at local and global level. The purpose of Received the report was to identify the impact of the air transport on the economic development of 19 May 2018 the region. In this connection, the following tasks have been set: to monitor trends in the Received in revised form development of the air passenger transport sector; to determine the impact of the average 20 October 2018 annual income per capita on the passenger flow; to establish the impact of passenger Accepted flows on the average annual income of the population as an indicator of the sustainable 23 October 2018 development of the region. The aim of the article was to establish the link between the passenger flow and the gross domestic product of the region. Economic data processing Correspondence: methods for the 10-year period were used through the Gretl program. The data obtained [email protected] is evidence of the positive impact of air transport development on the competitiveness of the region and its steady social-economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology EN – Dataset – MCA – Omio
    Methodology Stress-free Travel: The Most Convenient European Capital Airports The ranking of airports in Europe that offer a stress-free and convenient travel experience was determined by examining all European capital cities. If a capital city had more than one airport, the main international airport, defined as the one with the largest number of international flights, was selected. To create the ranking of the most convenient airports in Europe, all airports were analysed according to 17 factors that were grouped into four data-clusters: connectivity​, f​ acilities​, e​ ntertainment ​and s​ tress​. These were then weighted according to the level of influence airport operators can exert on each data cluster. Since “facilities” and “entertainment” can be determined by airport operators, they were deemed important data clusters when determining the level of convenience, weighing 40 percent each of the final score. However, airport operators have less influence on “stress” and “connectivity,” so both data clusters contribute to only 10 percent of the final score, since the punctuality of airlines, the geographical location and the availability of public transit options to reach the airport, for instance, cannot be controlled by the managing body of the airport. Research factors and sources Data cluster one: Connectivity (10%) ● Distance: ​The linear distance in kilometres between the capital’s main train ​ station and the airport was determined using G​ oogle Maps​. ● Public transport: ​The number of public transit options connecting the main ​ airport to the city centre was sourced from the official information provided by airport operators. Shuttle services were not included unless there were no other public transit options available.
    [Show full text]