1998 Annual Report Schiphol Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1998 Annual Report Schiphol Group 1998 annual report Schiphol Group. 981230 1998 annual report Schiphol Group . Table of contents. 1998 annual report Schiphol Group 4 Profile of Schiphol Group 7 Report of the Supervisory Board 9 Composition of the Supervisory Board, the Board of Management and the Works Council 10 Key figures 12 Historical summary 13 Main organisational structure Directors’ report 14 Introduction 18 Financial developments 22 Market and hub developments 30 International activities 34 Activities in The Netherlands 36 Our relation with the surroundings 41 Personnel developments Financial statements 46 Consolidated accounts 50 Principles of consolidation, valuation and determination of result 54 Notes to the consolidated balance sheet 61 Notes to the consolidated profit and loss account 64 Corporate accounts 66 Notes to the corporate accounts 71 Other information 74 Appendices 3 Board of Management of Schiphol Group: (from right to left) Gerlach Cerfontaine, Pieter Verboom and Ruud Uijlenhoet. Profile of Schipholpp Group . 8:15 “Schiphol Group” new overall name Mission Schiphol Group aims to be a leading, Up until now, NV Luchthaven Schiphol has international airport enterprise. operated under a single business name: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. This public limited Strategy company has now developed into a collection Schiphol Group’s strategy can be outlined of companies with a diversity of activities, both as follows: nationally and internationally. The new, overall • To further strengthen Schiphol Group’s business name “Schiphol Group” will therefore competitive position as an European ‘mainport’, be brought into use for the group and all its by increasing the volume of traffic, increasing participating interests. Amsterdam Airport quality, and extending the intermodal transport Schiphol will be used exclusively as the name for network – both nationally and internationally – . 1998 annual report Schiphol Group the company that operates the Schiphol location. within the context of sustained social The use of “Schiphol” in the group name is development. a conscious decision. The Schiphol “brand” ranks • To play an active role in the construction of a among the top ten most trusted brands in the network of airports, within which the Airport- Netherlands, and a sound international reputation City Concept can be developed and expanded as manager of quality airports has been developed upon, through a process of acquisition, under this name. This strong image will be built participation, and other forms of alliance. on further, while the name also provides the room • To build on know-how and service in retail sales, required for denoting the group’s current wider real estate, and information and communication field of activities. technology, in the framework of the AirportCity- Schiphol Group stands for a collection of concept, by developing new products and financially strong enterprises with a common services for new and existing customers. mission, strategy and positioning. Schiphol Group • To further develop and exploit the already- is involved in the development and operation of strong Schiphol brand and, in so doing, to activities and services which together constitute strengthen Schiphol Group’s reputation and the “AirportCity” concept. That goes beyond leading commercial position, nationally and the development of an efficient transport hub. internationally. The “AirportCity” offers its visitors – passengers, • To create a stimulating working environment so employees, meeters and greeters – but also the that Schiphol Group can attract, develop, and Schiphol based companies – airlines, distribution hold onto the best professionals available and companies and logistic and business services thereby maintain its leading role in the industry. providers – services 24 hours a day in the field • To generate value for the investors of capital in of shops, hotels and catering, information and order to acquire an ongoing commitment from communication, corporate business and the capital market and command the necessary conference facilities, and recreation and financial power for international expansion. relaxation. In this way, the group increases the provision of service to its customers, while more value is simultaneously created for shareholders. Schiphol Group is not only strong in the development, but also and particularly in the integration of all these activities into a coherent and durable entity that is closely knit with its geographical surroundings. This knowledge is unique, and is also internationally in demand. Schiphol Group is therefore increasingly marketing the AirportCity concept internationally. 5 Priorities for 1999-2002 period Ownership The following priorities apply for the period The company is owned by the Dutch State until 2002: (75.8%), the City of Amsterdam (21.8%) and the • Capacity management: optimization of City of Rotterdam (2.4%). Borrowed capital has Amsterdam Schiphol and conducting studies been furnished by institutional investors in the into the potential offered by an artificial island form of a bond loan in the sum of NLG 400 in the North Sea and by a complete redesign of million. External rating agencies have rated the Amsterdam Schiphol to increase traffic volume organisation AAA (Standard & Poor’s) and Aa1 for the Dutch aviation industry, to increase the (Moody’s). contribution to the national economy and to facilitate sustained development. • Operational excellence: the aim is that 1998 annual report Schiphol Group Amsterdam Schiphol retains its top position in Europe in terms of services to airlines, passengers and cargo carriers. • The development of Schiphol Group as an enterprise: relinquishing of governmental control and privatization. • The further development of retail sales, real estate and information and communication technology (ICT) as building blocks for the AirportCity concept, both nationally and internationally. • The exploration of opportunities for strategic alliances in order to realize the desired strategy. 6 Report of the Supervisory Board . 1998 annual report Schiphol Group The Supervisory Board met on seven occasions In order to flesh out the company’s ambition in the reporting year. Of these meetings, five were to become a leading international airport on the regular meeting schedule, whereas two operator, the regular meetings dealt with the were additional meetings. The additional meetings situation at the existing foreign participations. were convened in view of possible participations Discussion topics included transport developments in South Africa (March 1998) and Mexico at these airports and the effects of the crisis in (November 1998). The Financial Commission Asia. The Board also discussed a number of met twice. new opportunities for foreign participations. The company’s internationally oriented strategies During its meetings, the Supervisory Board played a key role in these discussions as well as devoted close attention to corporate strategy and the risk-analysis and the financing aspects thereof. operational risks. Corporate strategy was defined The Board also examined the possibilities by the discussion about the future airport infra- of a strategic alliance in the field of information structure in the Netherlands. The development technology with a view to the company’s of Amsterdam Schiphol, whether at the current continued strategic development. location or not, was an important topic of dis- In addition to dealing with the topics referred cussion during the meetings of the Supervisory to above, the Supervisory Board discussed a Board throughout the reporting year. The Board’s number of recurring topics, such as financial discussions also dealt with short-term policies, results, developments in traffic and transport, and including the relationship with the environment investment decisions, within the framework of, for and the various legal proceedings about the example, the Masterplan. The Board also took preservation of noise zoning in which the note of the resolution to change the name of the company was involved in the course of the organisation to ‘Schiphol Group’. In addition, the reporting year. Supervisory Board looked at the millennium issue In the context of short and medium-term and the consequences of the end to European policies, topics discussed by the Board included duty-free shopping, and the corrective measures increases to the available airspace capacity for civil to be taken in relation to these issues. aviation as well as the construction of the fifth Furthermore, the importance of privatization for runway, which can be qualified as belonging to the company’s further development was discussed the Optimization project. In the scope of long- in detail by the Board. term policies, the Board discussed various options, such as building an island in the North Sea and During a meeting not attended by the Board redesigning the current Schiphol location. of Management, the Supervisory Board discussed In this respect, the Board engaged in in-depth its own performance, as well as the composition discussions of the strategy to be pursued and the of the Board of Management and the Supervisory consequences for the current location. Board. The Supervisory Board also discussed the 7 remuneration received by the members of the The Board exchanged thoughts with the Board of Management and the Supervisory Board. external auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers about The remuneration commission met once in the the financial statements, financial reporting and reporting year. the
Recommended publications
  • Inhoud Uw Buurtblad De Boeselijn
    ____________________________ ____________________________ 42e jaargang, nr 324, februari 2020 inhoud 1 Inhoud 2 Maand- en weekagenda 4 Redactie 6 Dorpsraad 8 Genesius 10 Met het oog op Lijnden 11 Kerstbomen 12 Jelte stelt zich voor 14 Dorpsraad 17 Schilderclub 18 Schiphol overlast 20 Familieberichten 21 herinneringen 22 Verslag AL 2019 24 Even voorstellen 25 Petanque Lijnden 27 Weekenddiensten 28 Telefoonnummers Het hotel na de storm Uw buurtblad de Boeselijn Verschijnt 5 x per (verenigings-) jaar. De volgende uitgaven zijn rond 10 april en 19 juni Kopij graag 10 dagen eerder inleveren. e-mail: [email protected] Redactieleden: Lia Kooter, Els Dikkes en Ernst van Woerkom Redactie- Els Dikkes, Hoofdweg 64, 1175 LB Lijnden, tel 023 - 555 1426 adressen: Ernst van Woerkom, Schipholweg 647, Lijnden 023 - 555 1622 Kopieerwerk: ‘t copy shoppy, Lijnden Geplaatste artikelen of berichten, ondertekend door een persoon of namens een vereniging of club, vallen niet onder verantwoordelijkheid van de redactie. De Boeselijn staat ingeschreven in de Kamer van Koophandel onder nummer 6624 9430. - 1 - ____________________________ ____________________________ Agenda di 25 febr 20.00 Vluchthaven jaarvergadering Dorpsraad za 29 febr schrikkeldag zo 29 maart 02.00 Begin zomertijd: 02.00 wordt 03.00 uur Vergaderdata Dorpsraad di 25 febr 21.00 uur Vluchthaven (na de jaarvergadering) ma 30 maart 16.00 uur Vluchthaven ma 20 april 16.00 uur Vluchthaven Uitvoering Genesius za 28 maart 20.00 Vluchthaven “De fanclub” van Marcel Kragt za 4 april 20.00 Vluchthaven “De fanclub”
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2002 Contents Contents
    Annual Report 2002 contents Contents Address to shareholders 4 Key data 7 Board of Directors and Management 12 Corporate governance 15 Risk management 21 Significant events during 2002 23 Reports from the Divisions • Operations 25 • Marketing 27 • Buildings 29 • Corporate Development 31 Flight statistics 33 • 2002 flight statistics 34 • Market positioning 39 • Trend of traffic volumes 41 • Destinations 43 Financial report 45 • Group financial statements according to IFRS 46 • Audit report 70 • Financial statement pursuant to the Swiss Code of Obligations (OR) 71 • Audit report 79 3 address to shareholders Address to shareholders Dear Shareholders, During 2002, Zurich Airport felt the full impacts of the dissolution of SAirGroup, which gave rise to the need for comprehensive restructuring measures. The fundamental changes in ownership also led to a number of major challenges. Existing structures had to be completely reorganised, a task which Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG) successfully mastered. We were able to extract all the airside functions and infrastructures that are essential for airport business from the operations previously controlled by SAirGroup and now under new ownership, and bring them under our own control.This means that we have eliminated all inter- connections with and dependencies on external providers in the area of airside operations. We can therefore look back on a period of extremely intensive activity. But we still have a very busy time ahead of us, partly due to the step-by-step hand-over of components associated with expansion stage 5, but also in view of the political uncertainties throughout the world and their impacts on international civil aviation, and the ongoing debate on the home front concerning the function, size and operation of Zurich Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Hijacking: Some Domestic and International Responses
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 59 | Issue 2 Article 3 1970 Aircraft iH jacking: Some Domestic and International Responses John A. Volpe Secretary of Transportation John T. Stewart Jr. Federal Aviation Administration Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Air and Space Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Volpe, John A. and Stewart, John T. Jr. (1970) "Aircraft iH jacking: Some Domestic and International Responses," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 59 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol59/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aircraft Hijacking: Some Domestic and International Responses By JoHN A. VoLPE* and JoHN T. STEwART, Jn. * * Air piracy is one of the gravest problems of our time. From the domestic reactions to the first symptoms of the malady-the detours to Havana in the early 1960's-to the strengthened do- mestic and internationalresponse to the epidemic at the turn of the decade, Secretary Volpe and Mr. Stewart here catalogue a definitive statement of what has been done and what yet must be done to combat air piracy and international blackmail: the legal and scientific devices employed by the U.S. and urged for other countries, and international cooperation such as in the Tokyo Convention, the Hague Conventiont of December, 1970, and the draft conventions remaining on the internationalagenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction This Publication Contains Facts and Figures on Schiphol Group for the Year 2008
    Introduction This publication contains Facts and Figures on Schiphol Group for the year 2008. The information has been grouped into three categories: ‘About Schiphol Group’, ‘Amsterdam Airport Schiphol’ and ‘Airport Network’. More information on Schiphol Group can be found on the Internet. Please visit www.schipholgroup.com Information on Amsterdam Airport Schiphol can also be found on the Internet. Please visit www.schiphol.com, or telephone +31 (0)20 - 794 0800. Published by Schiphol Group Corporate Affairs P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol The Netherlands 1 Contents About Schiphol Group Airport Network Financial Results 6 Rotterdam Airport 29 Investments 8 Eindhoven Airport 30 Business Areas 9 Lelystad Airport 30 Aviation Business Area 10 Terminal 4, John F. Kennedy Airport, New York (USA) 31 Consumers Business Area 11 Brisbane Airport, Australia 31 Real Estate Business Area 12 Alliances & Participations business area 13 General Information History 14 Marketing AirportCity Products 33 Did you know…? 34 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Other Publications 35 Airport Zone 15 Telephone numbers, addresses, websites 35 Capacity 16 Shops and Catering Outlets 16 Ten Major European Airports 17 Traffic and Transport 18 Passengers Profile 24 Employment 25 Miscellaneous 27 Awards 28 2 3 About Schiphol Group Schiphol Group is an airport operator headquartered in the Netherlands. Our aim is to create sustainable value for our stakeholders by developing AirportCities and by positioning Amsterdam Airport Schiphol as most preferred airport in Europe. Our ambition is to rank among the world’s leading airport companies. An AirportCity is not only an efficient, multi- modal hub for air, rail an road transport, it is a dynamic hub integrating people and businesses, logistics and shops, information and entertainment offering its visitors and locally-based international businesses all the services they require on a 24/7 basis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (Sample Document)
    THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL SALES BENCHMARKING REPORT (sample document) by 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Disclaimer Methodology and Assumptions Summary of Findings : Duty-Free Summary of Findings : Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary of Findings : Food & Beverage Summary Tables: Duty-Free Summary Tables: Duty-Free and Duty-Paid Summary Tables: Food & Beverage Airport Profiles : Argentina – Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 Airport Profiles : Australia – Sydney Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Melbourne Airport Airport Profiles : Australia – Selected Australian Airports Airport Profiles : Austria – Vienna International Airport Airport Profiles : Bahrain – Bahrain International Airport Airport Profiles : Belgium – Brussels Airport Airport Profiles : Bulgaria – Sofia Airport Airport Profiles : Canada – Airports of Canada Airport Profiles : Canada – Ottawa International Airport The Airport Commercial Sales Benchmarking Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Airport Profiles : Canada – Toronto Pearson International Airport Airport Profiles : Chile – Arturo Benitez International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Beijing Capital International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport Airport Profiles : China – Shanghai Airports Airport Profiles : Costa Rica – Airports of Costa Rica Airport Profiles : Croatia – Dubrovnik Airport Airport Profiles : Croatia – Franjo Tuđman Airport Zagreb Airport Profiles : Czech Republic - Václav Havel Airport Prague Airport Profiles
    [Show full text]
  • The Competitive Position of Hub Airports in the Transatlantic Market
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 1 -2006 THE COMPETITIVE POSITION OF HUB AIRPORTS IN THE TRANSATLANTIC MARKET Guillaume Burghouwt SEO Economic Research Jan Veldhuis SEO Economic Research Amsterdam, The Netherlands ABSTRACT This article puts forward the argument that the measurement of connectivity in hub- and-spoke networks has to take into account the quality and quantity of both direct and indirect connections. The NETSCAN model, which has been applied in this study, quantifies indirect connectivity and scales it into a theoretical direct connection. NETSCAN allows researchers, airports, airlines, alliances and airport regions to analyse their competitive position in an integrated way. Using NETSCAN, the authors analysed the developments on the market between northwest Europe and the United States (US) between May 2003 and May 2005. One of the most striking developments has certainly been the impact of the Air France-KLM merger and the effects of the integration of KLM and Northwest into the SkyTeam alliance on the connectivity of Amsterdam Schiphol. Direct as well as indirect connectivity (via European and North American hubs) from Amsterdam to the US increased substantially. The main reason for this increase is the integration of the former Wings and SkyTeam networks via the respective hub airports. Moreover, the extended SkyTeam alliance raised frequencies between Amsterdam and the SkyTeam hubs (Atlanta, Houston, for example), opened new routes (Cincinnati) and boosted the network between Amsterdam and France. As a result of the new routes and frequencies, Amsterdam took over Heathrow’s position as the third best-connected northwest European airport to the US. _____________________________________________________________ Guillaume Burghouwt completed his PhD-research ‘Airline network development in Europe and its implications for airport planning’ in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Schiphol Group N.V. €4,000,000,000
    PROSPECTUS DATED 11 May 2020 ROYAL SCHIPHOL GROUP N.V. (INCORPORATED WITH LIMITED LIABILITY IN THE NETHERLANDS UNDER THE NAME ROYAL SCHIPHOL GROUP N.V. WITH CORPORATE SEAT AT SCHIPHOL, MUNICIPALITY OF HAARLEMMERMEER, THE NETHERLANDS) AS AN ISSUER AND AS A GUARANTOR SCHIPHOL NEDERLAND B.V. (INCORPORATED WITH LIMITED LIABILITY IN THE NETHERLANDS UNDER THE NAME SCHIPHOL NEDERLAND B.V. WITH CORPORATE SEAT AT SCHIPHOL, MUNICIPALITY OF HAARLEMMERMEER, THE NETHERLANDS) AS AN ISSUER AND AS A GUARANTOR €4,000,000,000 EURO MEDIUM TERM NOTE PROGRAMME On May 20, 1999 Royal Schiphol Group N.V. (“RSG”) entered into a €500,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme (as supplemented and amended, the “Programme”). On December 28, 2001 Schiphol Nederland B.V. (“Schiphol Nederland”) was substituted in place of RSG in respect of the outstanding Notes issued under the Programme and RSG became a guarantor in respect of such Notes. As from March 8, 2002, each of Schiphol Nederland and RSG (together the “Issuers” and each an “Issuer”) became an issuer under the Programme. This Prospectus supersedes the prospectus dated May 9, 2019. Any Notes (as defined below) issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Prospectus are issued subject to the provisions set out herein. This Prospectus does not affect any Notes already issued or any Notes issued after the date hereof and forming a single Series (as defined below) with Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Under the Programme, each of the Issuers may from time to time issue notes (the “Notes”) denominated in any currency agreed between the relevant Issuer and the relevant Dealer (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultuur, Geschiedenis En Erfgoed Van Haarlemmermeer
    44e jaargang nr 2 | Juni 2016 Meer-HistorieCultuur, geschiedenis en erfgoed van Haarlemmermeer LOSSE VERKOOP e4 Nieuwe tentoonstelling in het Historisch Museum: 28 De eeuw van mijn Schiphol Een verhalenverteller 10 in het Oude Raadhuis Hoofddorp Pioniers 14 50 Jaar Oom Ben ging emigreren 16 naar Australië Lijndenaar blijf je 30 een leven lang evenementen, exposities en Raad van toezicht activiteiten. Maar… met een Hiermee zult u zelden of nooit agenda alleen redden we het te maken hebben. De raad niet. We hebben u ook nodig bestaat uit vijf mensen die om zoveel mogelijk publiek toezicht houden op de financiën naar het museum te trekken. en op het werk van de directeur- Via via - en juist via u - weet bestuurder en de staf. het publiek ons te vinden. Kom naar de expositie, doe mee Directeurbestuurder aan een evenement of ga eens Deze spin-in-het-web functies naar een demonstratie en… zijn verenigd in één persoon – Cover: (Foto: Marcel Harlaar) zeg ’t voort! en wel die van ondergetekende, Gemaal De Cruquius Elise van Melis. Het is een con- Wij zijn u zeer dankbaar voor structie die tegenwoordig vaak alles wat u voor ons doet en voorkomt, o.m. bij bibliotheken, hebt gedaan. Als dank daarvoor bejaardencentra, schouwburgen, hebben we een mooie aanbie- en ook bij musea. Via u! En… ding voor u en voor al onze vrijwilligers, namelijk het boek Museumstaf wie doet wat? ‘Besturen in verandering’, De staf bestaat uit vijf personen, (over het openbaar bestuur in te weten een historicus, een Haarlemmermeer van 1855 - 2015) educatief medewerker, een Inderdaad, een wat cryptische voor de speciale prijs van medewerker voor zaalverhuur, titel, maar het gaat gewoon om € 10,00.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of DOHSA's Historic Application to Litigation Arising from High Seas Commercial Airline Accidents, 65 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 65 | Issue 4 Article 7 2000 Flying over Troubled Waters: The olC lapse of DOHSA's Historic Application to Litigation Arising from High Seas Commercial Airline Accidents Jad J. Stepp Michael J. AuBuchon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Jad J. Stepp et al., Flying over Troubled Waters: The Collapse of DOHSA's Historic Application to Litigation Arising from High Seas Commercial Airline Accidents, 65 J. Air L. & Com. 805 (2000) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol65/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. FLYING OVER TROUBLED WATERS: THE COLLAPSE OF DOHSA'S HISTORIC APPLICATION TO LITIGATION ARISING FROM HIGH SEAS COMMERCIAL AIRLINE ACCIDENTS JAD J. STEPP* MICHAEL J. AUBUCHON** TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................. 807 II. D O H SA ............................................ 809 A. THE STATUTE ................................... 809 B. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY ........................... 810 III. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES FLIGHT 800 LITIGATIO N ....................................... 811 A. INTRODUCTION ................................. 811 B. BACKGROUND ................................... 811 C. MOTION TO DISMISS NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES- SDNY's DECISION ............................... 811 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Development
    Page 1 of 12 25 July 2010 No. 885 DEV Published biweekly – available by annual subscription only – www.mombergerairport.info Editorial office / Subscriptions; Phone: +1 519 833 4642, e-mail: [email protected] Managing Editor / Publisher: Martin Lamprecht [email protected] News Editor: Paul Ellis [email protected] – Founding Editor: Manfred Momberger Copyright © 2010 – Momberger Airport Information by Air Trans Source Inc. – published since 1973 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT (Southern Europe) ITALY Fondi Italiani per le Infrastrutture SGR SpA (F2i) has initiated discussions with Ferrovial SA regarding acquiring a controlling stake in GE.S.A.C. S.p.A., the operator of Naples- Capodichino Airport (#883.OPS1). Reuters reported that F2i’s Board has asked CEO Vito Gamberale to discuss the airport deal, valued at EUR 150 to 200 million, with Ferrovial. The Spanish company holds a 65% stake in Capodichino Airport through BAA Airports Ltd. It intends to sell non-core assets such as Naples Airport to repay its massive debt, reported to be GBP 1.54 billion. “There are various interested parties in the airport and we are studying their proposals,” a source close to BAA’s parent company Ferrovial said. #885.1 Officials at Bologna Airport have begun a call of bids for the remodelling of the passenger terminal. An announcement was made in the European Union’s official gazette in order to determine which company will care for hub requalification, construction supervision, and security co-ordination during the project’s execution phase. A starting amount of EUR 21.5 million was mentioned. Work must be completed within 720 days from the assigned date.
    [Show full text]
  • ZWANENBURG WEST EN DE WEEREN Toelichting
    Ontwerp bestemmingsplan Cluster Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling ZWANENBURG WEST EN DE WEEREN toelichting maart 2017 Inhoudsopgave HOOFDSTUK 1: INLEIDING ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1. AANLEIDING ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. LIGGING EN BEGRENZING PLANGEBIED .......................................................................................... 1 1.3. DOEL EN PLANVORM ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. GELDENDE BESTEMMINGSPLANNEN EN REGELINGEN ........................................................................ 2 1.5. PLANPROCES ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.6. LEESWIJZER ............................................................................................................................. 2 HOOFDSTUK 2: BESCHRIJVING HUIDIGE SITUATIE ................................................................. 3 2.1. RUIMTELIJKE STRUCTUUR ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2. FUNCTIONELE STRUCTUUR ......................................................................................................... 6 2.3. VERKEERSSTRUCTUUR ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Van B&W
    Portefeuille J. Nieuwenburg Nota van B&W Auteurs A. Jansen, J. Stork, J. Bakker Telefoon 5113661, 5113540 E-mail: [email protected] SO/PM Reg.nr. 2007 / 233632 Te kopiëren: A Onderwerp B&W-vergadering van 29 januari 2008 Resultaten Tunnelstudie Zuidtangent 2007 Bestuurlijke context De eindrapportage van de haalbaarheidsstudie voor een lange ondergrondse verbinding voor de Zuidtangent in Haarlem is gereed (bijlage A). De onderliggende rapportages liggen ter inzage. De raad heeft in december 2006 medewerking toegezegd aan deze door de provincie in 2007 uitgevoerde haalbaarheidsstudie (233 / 2006). In de eindrapportage wordt geconcludeerd dat een ondergrondse verbinding voor de Zuidtangent in Haarlem haalbaar is, en dat een oplossingsrichting vanaf de Schipholweg, via het Houtplein en het centrum naar het NS-station hiervoor het meest doelmatig en kansrijk is. De verbinding is over de hele lengte ondergronds waardoor een forse verbetering optreedt van de kwaliteit van het (hoogwaardig) openbaar vervoer: de reistijd binnen de gemeente Haarlem wordt aanzienlijk bekort, terwijl betrouwbaarheid en comfort sterk verbeteren. Met aanvullende maatregelen kan het aantal busritten door de stad fors afnemen. Stadslijnen voor de lokale vervoerbehoefte blijven uiteraard in stand en worden waar nodig aangevuld. Er wordt bovendien geanticipeerd op toekomstige ontwikkelingen (als: aanleg tweede terminal Schiphol, Zuidas) en is het in de toekomst mogelijk om de verbinding te verlengen in noordelijke richting (Velsen / IJmuiden), alsmede aansluiting te zoeken op het hoogwaardig openbaar vervoer in de regio Amsterdam (Noord/Zuidlijn in het bijzonder). Thans wordt gevraagd in te stemmen met de conclusie uit de eindrapportage. Om te komen tot de daadwerkelijke aanleg van een tunnel dient op een aantal onderdelen een nadere uitwerking plaats te vinden.
    [Show full text]