MSK Travel EN A4.Indd
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF)
Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Parallel to the installation of an operational A-SMGCS (Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System) at Hamburg Airport, three partners agreed on the cooperation in installing and operating a unique field test platform for research and development in the field of air traffic manage- ment and airport operation. Trials to identify and evaluate improved ground processes The cooperation of DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, Ham- burg Airport and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) enables a large variety of opportunities for both operational stakehold- ers and research/development. In 2006, the partners set up the Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) as an operational environment. Thus, existing research infrastruc- tures such as apron, tower or airport control centre simulators could be extended with important operational input. The ARIF is a unique platform for the development, testing, evaluation and validation of future support systems in an operational en- vironment, aiming at midsize airports. Thus, ARIF provides essential advantages, such as: - Use of real-time data during development phases - Short cycles between implementation of innovative ideas and operators’ feedback - Direct evaluation of existing system components - (Pre-) testing of new concepts and future technology without operational limitations - Optimal infrastructure for shadow mode trials Research Areas Besides focusing on higher levels of A-SMGCS (e.g. planning and guidance), the ARIF at Hamburg Airport is also designed to allow research in the context of Total Airport Management (TAM) and Performance Based Airport Management (PBAM). All partners have identified the need for the development and implementation of an integrated airport management with a common set of operational data. -
Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: the Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg
Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany Between Ambition and Realities Working Paper 3 Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: The Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg Registration I will attend: By Jobst Fiedler and Alexander Wendler This working paper is part of the research project by the Hertie School of Governance Name on Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany – Between Ambition and Realities. For further information:Position www.hertie-school.org/infrastructure The study was made possible by theInstitution friendly support of the Karl Schlecht Foundation Email Hertie School of Governance | May 2015 Accompanied by Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 High-profile failure in large infrastructure projects…………………... 1 1.2 Research Question and Limitations………………………………….. 3 1.3 Hypothesis…………………………………………………………….... 4 1.4 Methods of Inquiry and Sources…………………………………….... 6 2. Megaprojects and their Inherent Problems………………………. 8 2.1 Large-scale Infrastructure Projects – an Introduction………………. 8 2.2 Empirical Performance of Large-scale Infrastructure Projects…….. 8 2.3 Drivers of Project Performance……………………………………….. 9 2.3.1 National Research Council (US Department of Energy) …………... 9 2.3.2 Miller and Lessard (IMEC Study) …………………………………….. 10 2.3.3 Flyvbjerg et al…………………………………………………………... 11 2.3.4 Mott MacDonald………………………………………………………... 14 2.3.5 Institute for Government / 2012 London Olympics………………….. 15 2.3.6 Eggers and O’Leary (If We Can Put A Man On The Moon) ………… 17 2.4 Analytical Framework for Review of BER Project…………………… 18 3. The BER Project………………………………………………………. 20 3.1 Background: The Long Road Towards a New Airport in Berlin…….. 20 3.2 BER Governance and Project Set-Up………………………………... 21 3.2.1 Against better knowledge: failure to appoint a general contractor and consequences for risk allocation………………………………… 21 3.2.2 Project Supervision and Control: deficiencies in structure and expertise levels………………………………………………………… 26 3.2.3 Financing and the Role of Banks…………………………………….. -
Managing Passenger Handling at Airport Terminals Individual-Based Approach for Modeling the Stochastic Passenger Behavior
Ninth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2011) Managing Passenger Handling at Airport Terminals Individual-based Approach for Modeling the Stochastic Passenger Behavior Michael Schultz and Hartmut Fricke Chair of Air Transport Technology and Logistics Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden, Germany {schultz, fricke}@ifl.tu-dresden.de Abstract—An efficient handling of passengers is essential for actions. Therefore, appropriate agent models have to be devel- reliable terminal processes. Since the entire progress of terminal oped and calibrated with empirical data. A calibration is man- handling depends on the individual behavior of the passengers, a datory to legitimate the application of the individual model valid and calibrated agent-based model allows for a detailed characteristics and allows for developing efficient system de- evaluation of system performance and for identifying optimiza- sign. tion capabilities. Our model is based on a stochastic approach for passenger movements including the capability of individual tacti- In turnaround procedures the behavior of individual pas- cal decision making and route choice, and on stochastic model of sengers is crucial for the handling efficiency, since both de- handling processes. Each component of the model was calibrated boarding and boarding are part of the critical path. Datasets with a comprehensive, scientifically reliable empirical data set; a from Airbus A380 ground handling at Emirates indicate a sig- virtual terminal environment was developed and real airport nificant level of impact of passenger handling at hub structures, conditions were evaluated. Our detailed stochastic modeling caused by a high transfer passenger volume [1]. The hub struc- approach points out the need for a significant change of the ture is a directly coupled transport system, which not only common flow-oriented design methods to illuminate the still possess intermodal traffic change (landside arrivals) but as well undiscovered terminal black box. -
Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto G
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Brussels, 25.08.2016 C(2016) 5375 final Subject: State aid SA.40197 (2016/N) – Lithuania Investment in infrastructure at Vilnius airport Sir, 1 PROCEDURE (1) On 31 December 2015, the Lithuanian authorities notified a measure concerning the modernisation of the Vilnius Airport's infrastructure (hereinafter “the measure”) after pre-notification contacts. (2) Between January and April 2016 several formal and informal contacts and information exchanges have taken place. The reply of the Lithuanian authorities to the Commission services' requests for information was received on 2 June 2016 and an update was received on 21 July 2016. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE 2.1 The beneficiary Vilnius airport/Lietuvos Oro Uostai (3) Since 1 July 2014, the operation of the three Lithuanian airports Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga has been entrusted to the State-owned company Lietuvos Oro Uostai (LUO) ("Lithuanian Airports") under the control of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The airport management company ensures account separation for the different airports. Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto g. 2 LT-01511 Vilnius LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKA Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 (4) LOU is the direct beneficiary of the notified measure. (5) The three airports complement each other in destinations covered, airlines present and passenger groups served. Vilnius airport is the main capital gateway for business and tourist travel from and to the country, Kaunas airport is focused on facilitating travel at low cost of Lithuanian nationals working/living abroad and Palanga airport provides access to the Scandinavian region using premium Scandinavian airlines for tourists and for business to and around the port city of Klaipeda. -
Airports Sector Report: Russia Contents
AIRPORTS SECTOR REPORT: RUSSIA CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 THE ECONOMY 2 3.0 RUSSIA/UK TRADE 3 4.0 THE AIRPORT SECTOR AN OVERVIEW 4 4.1 THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 4 4.2 THE RUSSIAN AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 4 5.0 THE AIRPORTS 6 5.1 MOSCOW SHEREMETYEVO 6 5.2 MOSCOW DOMODEDEVO 7 5.3 MOSCOW VNUKOVO 8 5.4 OTHER MOSCOW AIRPORTS 8 5.5 ST PETERSBURG PULKOVO 8 5.6 EKATERINBURG KOLTSOVO 9 6.0 THE RUSSIAN AIRLINES 11 7.0 PAYMENT/CREDIT INSURANCE/ECGD 14 8.0 CONTACTS IN RUSSIAN AVIATION 15 9.0 UK TRADE & INVESTMENT CONTACTS 17 i Airport Sector Report: Russia 1.0 INTRODUCTION THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION COVERS The Federation comprises 89 regions, each divided into six categories: TWO CONTINENTS, EUROPE AND ASIA, AND EVEN AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF Republics THE SOVIET UNION, RUSSIA REMAINS Districts THE LARGEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD Territories IN TERMS OF TERRITORY. Federal cities Autonomous regions The population of the Russian Federation is 144 million. Although more than 80 per cent of the Autonomous districts population is ethnically Russian, the Federation is a multinational state, containing many ethnic minority All regions are considered to be equal members of the groups. Russian Federation. The capital city is Moscow, with a population of As a founding state, each region has its own laws, 8.5 million and the second city is St Petersburg, with political institutions and local legislation. The more than 4.5 million. relationship between the Federal Government and each region is governed by a framework, which sets out which areas the federal government is responsible for and which it shares at a regional level. -
Airmail Connections Template
Variation Safe 1 – Time Table Summer 2016 From / To Amsterdam SPL Secure Time Table From/To Amsterdam MB/PvH issued March 10 2015 Valid from March 27, 2016 until October 29th, 2016 Validity Days Dep. Arr. Flight Op | Transfer (first) | Transfer (second) period time time number by | City time Flight Op | City time flight Op | number by | number by +1 = one day later +2 = two days later +3 = three days later +4 = four days later 2 Validity Days Dep. Arr. Flight Op | Transfer (first) | Transfer (second) period time time number by | City time Flight Op | City time flight Op | number by | number by AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ABU DHABI - INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (AUH) - 1234567 11:40 20:10 KL449 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ACCRA - KOTOKA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (ACC) - 1234567 15:25 20:05 KL589 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ALMATY - AIRPORT (ALA) 27Mar -01May -23---7 15:25 02:00+1 KL409 04May -26Oct --3---7 15:10 01:40+1 KL405 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ARUBA - REINA BEATRIX AIRPORT (AUA) - 1-3--6- 12:25 16:30 KL765 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ATHENS - ELEFTHERIOS VENIZELOS AIRPORT (ATH) - 12345-- 12:05 16:20 KL1575 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BAHRAIN - INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BAH) - 1-345-7 11:40 20:40 KL435 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BANGKOK - SUVARNABHUMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BKK) - 1234567 17:45 09:45+1 KL875 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BARCELONA - AIRPORT (BCN) - 12345-- 14:15 16:25 KL1673 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BEIJING - CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PEK) - 1234567 17:35 08:55+1 KL897 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BONAIRE - FLAMINGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BON) ---4--- 12:25 16:20 KL771 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) – BOMBAY/MUMBAI – CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI (BOM) - ------- xx:xx xx:xx NO FLIGHTS 3 Validity Days Dep. -
Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 10.10 Session
Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 Draft agenda 10.00 - 10.10 Opening speech. International review: airlines and airports on the way to recovery Kurt Hofmann, journalist, aviation expert, Air Transport World 10.10 Session 1. AIR FIELD IN NEW REALITY Moderators: Alexey Sinitsky, Research and Development Director, Infomost Consulting 10.10 - 10.30 Airport of the future: new world, new trends Pierre Charbonneau, Director, Passenger at International Air Transport Association* 10.35 - 10.55 Air traffic restart roadmap TBC, NACO 10.55 - 11.55 Cases. On the way to recovery Herbert M.Keffel, Practice Leader and Management Consultant, Munich Airport International Radek Zabransky, Director Aviation & Strategic Marketing, Bratislava Milan Rastislav Stefanik Airport* Marius Gelzinis, CEO, Lithuanian Airports Aboudy Nasser, CCO, London Stansted Airport Liene Freivalde, Director Aviation Services and Business Development, Riga International Airport 11.55 - 12.20 Coffee break 12.20 - 12.40 Cases. Russian airport experience: growth area of route networks and passenger flows TBC, Domodedovo* Evgeny Ilyin, Commercial Director, Pulkovo Airport * 12.45 - 13.30 Dialogue with experts. The airport in the new reality Opening speech: Support of the state in international practice Speaker TBC Key topics: State participation: what airports expected in Russia and international overview Airports’ sources of income: adaptation to the new reality. Ways to restore non-aviation revenues Air Cargo Development: a long-term trend or short-term reaction? -
Powerpoint Sunusu
www.tdt.aero [email protected] You Fly We Care... Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE? Cam Rahn Airport CXR Tiran Airport TIA Dublin Airport DUB TD Team was founded in the year 2007. The company’s aim was to apply similar personnel contracting business model used in Europe. Our company provided technical personnel to support foreign operations in Nigeria, Russia and the United States of America and also during last 3 years operations in Turkey Civil air transport sector. We successfully performed subcontracted services for maintenance companies by renting contracted personnel for A/C painting, structural works, and cabin interior services under control of the quality management systems. TD Team personnel keeps providing fast, reliable and qualified subcontract services to its clients on technical support, painting, cabin interior and structural works. Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE ? Cam Rahn CXR Tiran TIA Dublin Airport DUB In the year 2012, TD Team has got its first approval as a SHY-145/JAR-145 certificate with an approval number TR.145.082 from Turkish Civil Aviation Authority (DGCA/SHGM) for Line Maintenance services. TD Team is authorised to provide technical services in Bodrum International TR.145.0082 Airport (BJV), Dalaman International Airport (DLM), Antalya International Airport (AYT), İstanbul Atatürk Airport (IST) and Sabiha Gökçen Airport (SAW), Cam Rahn (CXR), Tiran (TIA) and Dublin (DUB). -
PRIVATIZATION of TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D
PRIVATIZATION OF TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D. Student at Humboldt University [email protected] Draft: 23.07.2010, -Please do not distribute without the permission of the authors- ABSTRACT: Starting in 1993, the General Directorate of State Airports Authority (SAA) has partially privatized the major airport terminals in Turkey by using Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) methods. One of the main reasons for privatization was the necessity of investing in terminals, as passenger numbers increased dramatically in the last decade and terminal facilities were the initial bottleneck. In this way, the state was able to shift the burden of financing and operation to the private sector. The selection of airports, the particular form of privatization with a BOT method for terminals and later on the associated long term leases and their economic effects raise interesting research questions. Furthermore, a comparison of BOT method with other privatization methodologies gives an insight of advantages and drawbacks in the implementation. One question investigates if the SAA makes use of the previous experience on airport privatization in the world. The BOT implementations are evaluated in terms of capital investment funding, contractual design and the operation period acquired by the private sector via auctions. Moreover, the details of the Lease agreements following the expiration of BOT contracts at Istanbul Atatürk and Antalya airport are described to raise some questions on the contracts and the auctions took place. WWW.GAP-PROJEKT.DE _____________________________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Hans-Martin Niemeier Prof. Dr. Jürgen Müller Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer Hochschule Bremen HWR Berlin Internationale Fachhochschule Bad Honnef Werderstr. 73 Badensche Str. -
Harmonised Annual KPI Report 2020 Download
KPI Annual Report 2020 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Version History: Version Date Remark Author 0.1 14.06.21 Initial Draft Barboff 0.5 21.06.21 Conclusions added, general edits Editorial Board 0.8 16.07.21 Editorial review Editorial Board 0.9 21.07.21 Final edits & review Barboff 1.0 03.08.21 Version for Publication Editorial Board 1.1 05.08.21 List of Abbreviations added Barboff Annual KPI Report Page 2 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Imprint Publisher: DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH on behalf of German Harmonisation Initiative A-CDM Germany Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Contacts: Erik Sinz & Sebastian Barboff, OZ/AA Airspace & Aerodrome Operations Editorial Board: Sebastian Barboff DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Boris Breug Flughafen München GmbH D-85326 München-Flughafen GERMANY Stefan Hilger Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide D-60547 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY Nico Ruwe Flughafen Stuttgart GmbH Flughafenstraße 32 D-70629 Stuttgart GERMANY Date: 05 August 2021 Pages: 29 All rights reserved. Any use outside of the limits set by the German Urheberrechtsgesetz requires written permission of the publisher. Violations will be prosecuted in civil and criminal court. This includes copying, translating, microfiching, and storing and processing in electronic systems. DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2021 Annual KPI Report Page 3 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Content 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 2 GERMAN HARMONISATION INITIATIVE A-CDM -
Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020
Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020 Marius Gelžinis CEO, LITHUANIAN AIRPORTS GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Passenger projections by international organizations 2031 2033 2037 x2 x2 x2 in 15 years in total % 4.9 Global 4.6% Globally 8.2bn Globally per year traffic flow per year 2037 2037 m/yr. m/yr ) +550 +661 Local 1.9 trillion bln. 2.0% ( RPK 2.3% CAGR In Europe per year In Europe per year International Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Projections by Aviation consultants, airlines and aircraft manufacturers TOP 10 aircraft orders by European airlines 2036 x2 +23 470 in 20 years 281 70 225 47 Number of aircraft 23 530 Traffic Flows 146 39 In total 41 030 144 32 2036 37 390 in 20 years 133 Aircraft 57% 25 orders 23 470 will execute orders Aircraft demand Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors do Planning to build new passenger terminals RIX TLL WAW KRK At the end of 2017, a tender In 2018 the initial plans for was launched for the 2018-2021 strategy: development of the airport visualization of the airport November 2018: master plan expansion of Tallinn Airport were launched. The terminal, with which Riga of Krakow Airport 2036 passenger terminal to be government is involved in Airport launched an approved Plėtros planai Plėtros implemented in 2018-2024 the project of development ambitious airport terminal until 2027 development project Sources: Riga Airport, 2019; Tallinn Airport, 2018; Warsaw Airport, 2018; Krakow Airport, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors -
Tariffs for 2020
TARIFFS FOR 2020 Tariff Name Page 1 Tariff For International Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 3 2 Tariff For Domestic Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 6 3 Tariff For Passenger Services 9 4 Tariff For Safety Precation 11 5 Tariff For Aircraft / Vehicles Marshalling 12 6 Tariff For Extension Of Airport Working Hours 14 7 Tariff For Passenger Boarding Bridge Services 15 8 Tariff For Ground Handling Services 17 9 Tariff For Refueling Concession 21 10 Tariff For Apron Vehicle Private Plate 22 11 Tariff For Entry Cards 25 12 Tariff For Communication Systems 28 13 Tariff For Communication System Allocation and Infrastructure Rights 30 14 Tariff For Power, Water, Sewerage, HVAC 32 15 Tariff For Tools, Equipment, Materials Allocation 36 16 Tariff For Terminal Area Allocation 39 17 Tariff For Land and Other Building Spaces Allocation 45 18 Tariff For Check-In, Transit Counters, Kiosk and Information Desks 47 19 Tariff For Flight Information Display System Usage 50 20 Tariff For Car Park 51 21 Tariff For Video and Photograph Shooting 55 22 Tariff For General Aviation Terminal 56 23 Tariff For Porter 58 24 Tariff For Medical Services 59 25 Tariff For Baggage Room Services 60 26 Tariff For Baggage Tracking Service 61 Activation : This tariff becomes valid upon the approval of General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) with effect from 1st January 2020 and it remains valid until the new tariff. Legal Disclaimer : These tariffs are valid for Airport/Terminal Operators. The official transcript of this text is in Turkish. The text in Turkish is applied in any legal dispute.