DOCSLIB.ORG

MSK Travel EN A4.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSK Travel EN A4.Indd International Airports city country airport name iata distance city country airport name iata distance from city from city North America miles km Asia miles km Atlanta USA Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport ATL 11 19 Bangkok Thailand Suvarnabhumi Airport BKK 16 26 Boston USA Logan International Airport BOS 3 5 Delhi India Indira Gandhi International Airport DEL 12 19 Calgary Canada Calgary International Airport YYC 11 18 Doha Qatar Doha International Airport DOH 10 16 Chicago USA O’Hare International Airport ORD 19 31 Doha Qatar New Doha International Airport n/a* 6 10 Dallas/Fort Worth USA Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport DFW 24 38 Dubai United Arab Dubai International Airport DXB 2 3 Denver USA Denver International Airport DEN 28 45 Emirates Detroit USA Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport DTW 20 32 Guangzhou People’s Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport CAN 22 35 Republic of Edmonton Canada Edmonton International Airport YEG 18 29 China Houston USA George Bush Intercontinental Airport IAH 23 37 Hong Kong People’s Hong Kong International Airport HKD 20 32 Kansas City USA Kansas City International Airport MCI 22 35 Republic of Las Vegas USA McCarran International Airport LAS 4 6 China Los Angeles USA Los Angeles International Airport LAX 19 31 Jakarta Indonesia Soekarno-Hatta International Airport CGK 12 19 Miami USA Miami International Airport MIA 8 13 Jeddah Saudi King Abdulaziz International Airport JED 12 19 Arabia Minneapolis/ USA Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport MSP 13 21 St Paul Karachi Pakistan Jinnah International Airport KHI 12 19 Montreal Canada Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International YUL 13 21 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Kuala Lumpur International Airport KUL 31 50 Airport Manila Philippines Ninoy Aquino International Airport MNL 6 10 Nashville USA Nashville International Airport BNA 9 14 Mumbai India Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport BOM 22 35 New York USA John F. Kennedy International Airport JFK 19 31 People’s Republic Beijing Beijing Capital International Airport PEK 16 26 New York USA LaGuardia Airport LGA 13 21 of China Newark USA Newark Liberty International Airport EWR 14 22 Riyadh Saudi King Khalid International Airport RUH 22 35 Arabia Philadelphia USA Philadelphia International Airport PHL 11 17 Seoul South Incheon International Airport ICN 43 69 Portland, Oregon USA Portland International Airport PDX 11 18 Korea San Francisco USA San Francisco International Airport SFO 13 21 Shanghai People’s Shanghai Pudong International Airport PVG 30 48 Seattle USA Seattle-Tacoma International Airport SEA 14 23 Republic of Toronto Canada Toronto Pearson International Airport YYZ 17 27 China Vancouver Canada Vancouver International Airport YVR 9 14 Singapore Singapore Singapore Changi Airport SIN 12 19 Washington DC USA Washington Dulles International Airport IAD 26 42 Taipei Taiwan Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport TPE 30 48 Tokyo Japan Tokyo International Airport HND 11 18 Central / South America miles km Tokyo Japan Narita International Airport NRT 46 74 Bogotá Colombia El Dorado International Airport BOG 8 13 Brasília Brazil Brasília International Airport BSB 10 16 Middle East miles km Buenos Aires Argentina Ministro Pistarini International Airport EZE 14 23 Amman Jordan Queen Alia International Airport AMM 20 32 Buenos Aires Argentina Jorge Newbery Airport AEP 1 2 Tehran Iran Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airport IKA 33 53 Caracas Venezuela Simón Bolívar International Airport CCS 13 21 Tel Aviv Israel Ben Gurion International Airport TLV 13 21 Lima Peru Jorge Chávez International Airport LIM 8 13 Mexico City Mexico Mexico City International Airport MEX 6 10 Rio de Janeiro Brazil Santos Dumont Airport SDU 1 1 Santiago Chile Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International SCL 17 27 Airport São Paulo Brazil São Paulo-Guarulhos International Airport GRU 16 25 São Paulo Brazil Congonhas-São Paulo Airport CDH 8 13 Toluca Mexico Licenciado Adolfo López Mateos International TLC 25 40 TRAVEL JOURNAL: International Airports Airport * code not yet assigned at time of printing Passion travel_240_EN.indd 22 13/09/10 10:32 Passion travel_240_EN.indd 23 13/09/10 10:32 city country airport name iata distance city country airport name iata distance from city from city Europe miles km Europe miles km Amsterdam Netherlands Amsterdam Airport Schiphol AMS 11 18 Riga Latvia Riga International Airport RIX 6 10 Antalya Turkey Antalya Airport AYT 8 13 Rome Italy Leonardo da Vinci-Fiumicino Airport FCO 20 32 Athens Greece Athens International Airport ATH 21 34 St Petersburg Russia Pulkovo Airport LED 10 16 Barcelona Spain Barcelona El Prat Airport BCN 11 18 Stockholm Sweden Stockholm-Arlanda Airport ARN 27 43 Berlin Germany Berlin Tegel Airport TXL 9 14 Tallinn Estonia Lennart Meri Tallinn Airport TLL 3 5 Berlin Germany Berlin-Brandenburg International Airport BER** 14 23 Vienna Austria Vienna International Airport VIE 14 23 Berlin Germany Berlin Schönefeld Airport SXF 14 23 Vilnius Lithuania Vilnius International Airport VNO 5 8 Bratislava Slovakia Milan Rastislav Štefánik Airport BTS 6 10 Warsaw Poland Warsaw Frédéric Chopin Airport WAW 6 10 Brussels Belgium Brussels Airport BRU 8 13 Zagreb Croatia Zagreb Airport ZAG 10 16 Budapest Hungary Budapest Ferihegy International Airport BUD 12 19 Zürich Switzerland Zürich Airport ZRH 7 11 Copenhagen Denmark Copenhagen Airport CPH 5 8 Australasia miles km Dublin Ireland Dublin Airport DUB 6 10 Auckland New Auckland Airport AKL 13 21 Düsseldorf Germany Düsseldorf International Airport DUS 6 10 Zealand Frankfurt Germany Frankfurt Airport FRA 8 13 Brisbane Australia Brisbane Airport BNE 8 13 Geneva Switzerland Geneva Cointrin International Airport GVA 3 5 Christchurch New Christchurch International Airport CHC 7 11 Hamburg Germany Hamburg Airport HAM 7 11 Zealand Helsinki Finland Helsinki-Vantaa Airport HEL 12 19 Melbourne Australia Melbourne Airport MEL 16 26 Istanbul Turkey Atatürk International Airport IST 17 27 Perth Australia Perth Airport PER 13 21 Kiev Ukraine Boryspil International Airport KBP 22 35 Sydney Australia Sydney Airport SYD 5 8 Lisbon Portugal Lisbon Portela Airport LIS 5 8 Africa Ljubljana Slovenia Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport LJU 16 26 miles km London United London Heathrow Airport LHR 15 24 Cairo Egypt Cairo International Airport CAI 14 23 Kingdom Cape Town South Cape Town International Airport CPT 12 19 London United London Gatwick Airport LGW 29 47 Africa Kingdom Casablanca Morocco Mohammed V International Airport CMN 22 35 London United London Stansted Airport STN 38 61 Dakar Senegal Léopold Sédar Senghor International Airport DKR 14 23 Kingdom Dar es Salaam Tanzania Julius Nyerere International Airport DAR 7 11 Luxembourg Luxembourg Findel Airport LUX 6 10 Johannesburg South OR Tambo International Airport JNB 14 23 Madrid Spain Barajas Airport MAD 8 13 Africa Manchester United Manchester Airport MAN 10 16 Lagos Nigeria Murtala Muhammed International Airport LOS 13 21 Kingdom Nairobi Kenya Jomo Kenyatta International Airport NBO 11 18 Milan Italy Malpensa Airport MXP 30 48 Milan Italy Linate Airport LIN 6 10 Moscow Russia Domodedovo International Airport DME 29 47 Moscow Russia Sheremetyevo International Airport SVO 18 29 Munich Germany Munich Airport MUC 24 39 Oslo Norway Oslo Airport, Gardermoen OSL 31 50 Palma de Mallorca Spain Palma de Mallorca Airport PMI 5 8 Paris France Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport CDG 14 23 Paris France Paris-Orly Airport ORY 13 21 Prague Czech Ruzyně Airport PRG 10 16 Republic Reykjavík Iceland Keflavík International Airport KEF 31 50 TRAVEL JOURNAL: International Airports Reykjavík Iceland Reykjavík Airport RKV 3 5 ** code yet to be confi rmed at time of printing Passion travel_240_EN.indd 24 13/09/10 10:32 Passion travel_240_EN.indd 25 13/09/10 10:32.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF)
    Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) Parallel to the installation of an operational A-SMGCS (Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System) at Hamburg Airport, three partners agreed on the cooperation in installing and operating a unique field test platform for research and development in the field of air traffic manage- ment and airport operation. Trials to identify and evaluate improved ground processes The cooperation of DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, Ham- burg Airport and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) enables a large variety of opportunities for both operational stakehold- ers and research/development. In 2006, the partners set up the Airport Research and Innovation Facility Hamburg (ARIF) as an operational environment. Thus, existing research infrastruc- tures such as apron, tower or airport control centre simulators could be extended with important operational input. The ARIF is a unique platform for the development, testing, evaluation and validation of future support systems in an operational en- vironment, aiming at midsize airports. Thus, ARIF provides essential advantages, such as: - Use of real-time data during development phases - Short cycles between implementation of innovative ideas and operators’ feedback - Direct evaluation of existing system components - (Pre-) testing of new concepts and future technology without operational limitations - Optimal infrastructure for shadow mode trials Research Areas Besides focusing on higher levels of A-SMGCS (e.g. planning and guidance), the ARIF at Hamburg Airport is also designed to allow research in the context of Total Airport Management (TAM) and Performance Based Airport Management (PBAM). All partners have identified the need for the development and implementation of an integrated airport management with a common set of operational data.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: the Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg
    Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany Between Ambition and Realities Working Paper 3 Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: The Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg Registration I will attend: By Jobst Fiedler and Alexander Wendler This working paper is part of the research project by the Hertie School of Governance Name on Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany – Between Ambition and Realities. For further information:Position www.hertie-school.org/infrastructure The study was made possible by theInstitution friendly support of the Karl Schlecht Foundation Email Hertie School of Governance | May 2015 Accompanied by Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 High-profile failure in large infrastructure projects…………………... 1 1.2 Research Question and Limitations………………………………….. 3 1.3 Hypothesis…………………………………………………………….... 4 1.4 Methods of Inquiry and Sources…………………………………….... 6 2. Megaprojects and their Inherent Problems………………………. 8 2.1 Large-scale Infrastructure Projects – an Introduction………………. 8 2.2 Empirical Performance of Large-scale Infrastructure Projects…….. 8 2.3 Drivers of Project Performance……………………………………….. 9 2.3.1 National Research Council (US Department of Energy) …………... 9 2.3.2 Miller and Lessard (IMEC Study) …………………………………….. 10 2.3.3 Flyvbjerg et al…………………………………………………………... 11 2.3.4 Mott MacDonald………………………………………………………... 14 2.3.5 Institute for Government / 2012 London Olympics………………….. 15 2.3.6 Eggers and O’Leary (If We Can Put A Man On The Moon) ………… 17 2.4 Analytical Framework for Review of BER Project…………………… 18 3. The BER Project………………………………………………………. 20 3.1 Background: The Long Road Towards a New Airport in Berlin…….. 20 3.2 BER Governance and Project Set-Up………………………………... 21 3.2.1 Against better knowledge: failure to appoint a general contractor and consequences for risk allocation………………………………… 21 3.2.2 Project Supervision and Control: deficiencies in structure and expertise levels………………………………………………………… 26 3.2.3 Financing and the Role of Banks……………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Passenger Handling at Airport Terminals Individual-Based Approach for Modeling the Stochastic Passenger Behavior
    Ninth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2011) Managing Passenger Handling at Airport Terminals Individual-based Approach for Modeling the Stochastic Passenger Behavior Michael Schultz and Hartmut Fricke Chair of Air Transport Technology and Logistics Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden, Germany {schultz, fricke}@ifl.tu-dresden.de Abstract—An efficient handling of passengers is essential for actions. Therefore, appropriate agent models have to be devel- reliable terminal processes. Since the entire progress of terminal oped and calibrated with empirical data. A calibration is man- handling depends on the individual behavior of the passengers, a datory to legitimate the application of the individual model valid and calibrated agent-based model allows for a detailed characteristics and allows for developing efficient system de- evaluation of system performance and for identifying optimiza- sign. tion capabilities. Our model is based on a stochastic approach for passenger movements including the capability of individual tacti- In turnaround procedures the behavior of individual pas- cal decision making and route choice, and on stochastic model of sengers is crucial for the handling efficiency, since both de- handling processes. Each component of the model was calibrated boarding and boarding are part of the critical path. Datasets with a comprehensive, scientifically reliable empirical data set; a from Airbus A380 ground handling at Emirates indicate a sig- virtual terminal environment was developed and real airport nificant level of impact of passenger handling at hub structures, conditions were evaluated. Our detailed stochastic modeling caused by a high transfer passenger volume [1]. The hub struc- approach points out the need for a significant change of the ture is a directly coupled transport system, which not only common flow-oriented design methods to illuminate the still possess intermodal traffic change (landside arrivals) but as well undiscovered terminal black box.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto G
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Brussels, 25.08.2016 C(2016) 5375 final Subject: State aid SA.40197 (2016/N) – Lithuania Investment in infrastructure at Vilnius airport Sir, 1 PROCEDURE (1) On 31 December 2015, the Lithuanian authorities notified a measure concerning the modernisation of the Vilnius Airport's infrastructure (hereinafter “the measure”) after pre-notification contacts. (2) Between January and April 2016 several formal and informal contacts and information exchanges have taken place. The reply of the Lithuanian authorities to the Commission services' requests for information was received on 2 June 2016 and an update was received on 21 July 2016. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE 2.1 The beneficiary Vilnius airport/Lietuvos Oro Uostai (3) Since 1 July 2014, the operation of the three Lithuanian airports Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga has been entrusted to the State-owned company Lietuvos Oro Uostai (LUO) ("Lithuanian Airports") under the control of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The airport management company ensures account separation for the different airports. Mr. Linas LINKEVIČIUS Užsienio Reikalų Ministerija J. Tumo-Vaižganto g. 2 LT-01511 Vilnius LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKA Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 (4) LOU is the direct beneficiary of the notified measure. (5) The three airports complement each other in destinations covered, airlines present and passenger groups served. Vilnius airport is the main capital gateway for business and tourist travel from and to the country, Kaunas airport is focused on facilitating travel at low cost of Lithuanian nationals working/living abroad and Palanga airport provides access to the Scandinavian region using premium Scandinavian airlines for tourists and for business to and around the port city of Klaipeda.
    [Show full text]
  • Airports Sector Report: Russia Contents
    AIRPORTS SECTOR REPORT: RUSSIA CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 THE ECONOMY 2 3.0 RUSSIA/UK TRADE 3 4.0 THE AIRPORT SECTOR AN OVERVIEW 4 4.1 THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 4 4.2 THE RUSSIAN AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 4 5.0 THE AIRPORTS 6 5.1 MOSCOW SHEREMETYEVO 6 5.2 MOSCOW DOMODEDEVO 7 5.3 MOSCOW VNUKOVO 8 5.4 OTHER MOSCOW AIRPORTS 8 5.5 ST PETERSBURG PULKOVO 8 5.6 EKATERINBURG KOLTSOVO 9 6.0 THE RUSSIAN AIRLINES 11 7.0 PAYMENT/CREDIT INSURANCE/ECGD 14 8.0 CONTACTS IN RUSSIAN AVIATION 15 9.0 UK TRADE & INVESTMENT CONTACTS 17 i Airport Sector Report: Russia 1.0 INTRODUCTION THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION COVERS The Federation comprises 89 regions, each divided into six categories: TWO CONTINENTS, EUROPE AND ASIA, AND EVEN AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF Republics THE SOVIET UNION, RUSSIA REMAINS Districts THE LARGEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD Territories IN TERMS OF TERRITORY. Federal cities Autonomous regions The population of the Russian Federation is 144 million. Although more than 80 per cent of the Autonomous districts population is ethnically Russian, the Federation is a multinational state, containing many ethnic minority All regions are considered to be equal members of the groups. Russian Federation. The capital city is Moscow, with a population of As a founding state, each region has its own laws, 8.5 million and the second city is St Petersburg, with political institutions and local legislation. The more than 4.5 million. relationship between the Federal Government and each region is governed by a framework, which sets out which areas the federal government is responsible for and which it shares at a regional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Airmail Connections Template
    Variation Safe 1 – Time Table Summer 2016 From / To Amsterdam SPL Secure Time Table From/To Amsterdam MB/PvH issued March 10 2015 Valid from March 27, 2016 until October 29th, 2016 Validity Days Dep. Arr. Flight Op | Transfer (first) | Transfer (second) period time time number by | City time Flight Op | City time flight Op | number by | number by +1 = one day later +2 = two days later +3 = three days later +4 = four days later 2 Validity Days Dep. Arr. Flight Op | Transfer (first) | Transfer (second) period time time number by | City time Flight Op | City time flight Op | number by | number by AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ABU DHABI - INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (AUH) - 1234567 11:40 20:10 KL449 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ACCRA - KOTOKA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (ACC) - 1234567 15:25 20:05 KL589 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ALMATY - AIRPORT (ALA) 27Mar -01May -23---7 15:25 02:00+1 KL409 04May -26Oct --3---7 15:10 01:40+1 KL405 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ARUBA - REINA BEATRIX AIRPORT (AUA) - 1-3--6- 12:25 16:30 KL765 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - ATHENS - ELEFTHERIOS VENIZELOS AIRPORT (ATH) - 12345-- 12:05 16:20 KL1575 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BAHRAIN - INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BAH) - 1-345-7 11:40 20:40 KL435 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BANGKOK - SUVARNABHUMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BKK) - 1234567 17:45 09:45+1 KL875 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BARCELONA - AIRPORT (BCN) - 12345-- 14:15 16:25 KL1673 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BEIJING - CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PEK) - 1234567 17:35 08:55+1 KL897 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) - BONAIRE - FLAMINGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BON) ---4--- 12:25 16:20 KL771 AMSTERDAM - SCHIPHOL AIRPORT (AMS) – BOMBAY/MUMBAI – CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI (BOM) - ------- xx:xx xx:xx NO FLIGHTS 3 Validity Days Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 10.10 Session
    Airport of the Future — 2020 Moscow, November 11, 2020 Draft agenda 10.00 - 10.10 Opening speech. International review: airlines and airports on the way to recovery Kurt Hofmann, journalist, aviation expert, Air Transport World 10.10 Session 1. AIR FIELD IN NEW REALITY Moderators: Alexey Sinitsky, Research and Development Director, Infomost Consulting 10.10 - 10.30 Airport of the future: new world, new trends Pierre Charbonneau, Director, Passenger at International Air Transport Association* 10.35 - 10.55 Air traffic restart roadmap TBC, NACO 10.55 - 11.55 Cases. On the way to recovery Herbert M.Keffel, Practice Leader and Management Consultant, Munich Airport International Radek Zabransky, Director Aviation & Strategic Marketing, Bratislava Milan Rastislav Stefanik Airport* Marius Gelzinis, CEO, Lithuanian Airports Aboudy Nasser, CCO, London Stansted Airport Liene Freivalde, Director Aviation Services and Business Development, Riga International Airport 11.55 - 12.20 Coffee break 12.20 - 12.40 Cases. Russian airport experience: growth area of route networks and passenger flows TBC, Domodedovo* Evgeny Ilyin, Commercial Director, Pulkovo Airport * 12.45 - 13.30 Dialogue with experts. The airport in the new reality Opening speech: Support of the state in international practice Speaker TBC Key topics: State participation: what airports expected in Russia and international overview Airports’ sources of income: adaptation to the new reality. Ways to restore non-aviation revenues Air Cargo Development: a long-term trend or short-term reaction?
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint Sunusu
    www.tdt.aero [email protected] You Fly We Care... Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE? Cam Rahn Airport CXR Tiran Airport TIA Dublin Airport DUB TD Team was founded in the year 2007. The company’s aim was to apply similar personnel contracting business model used in Europe. Our company provided technical personnel to support foreign operations in Nigeria, Russia and the United States of America and also during last 3 years operations in Turkey Civil air transport sector. We successfully performed subcontracted services for maintenance companies by renting contracted personnel for A/C painting, structural works, and cabin interior services under control of the quality management systems. TD Team personnel keeps providing fast, reliable and qualified subcontract services to its clients on technical support, painting, cabin interior and structural works. Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE ? Cam Rahn CXR Tiran TIA Dublin Airport DUB In the year 2012, TD Team has got its first approval as a SHY-145/JAR-145 certificate with an approval number TR.145.082 from Turkish Civil Aviation Authority (DGCA/SHGM) for Line Maintenance services. TD Team is authorised to provide technical services in Bodrum International TR.145.0082 Airport (BJV), Dalaman International Airport (DLM), Antalya International Airport (AYT), İstanbul Atatürk Airport (IST) and Sabiha Gökçen Airport (SAW), Cam Rahn (CXR), Tiran (TIA) and Dublin (DUB).
    [Show full text]
  • PRIVATIZATION of TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D
    PRIVATIZATION OF TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D. Student at Humboldt University [email protected] Draft: 23.07.2010, -Please do not distribute without the permission of the authors- ABSTRACT: Starting in 1993, the General Directorate of State Airports Authority (SAA) has partially privatized the major airport terminals in Turkey by using Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) methods. One of the main reasons for privatization was the necessity of investing in terminals, as passenger numbers increased dramatically in the last decade and terminal facilities were the initial bottleneck. In this way, the state was able to shift the burden of financing and operation to the private sector. The selection of airports, the particular form of privatization with a BOT method for terminals and later on the associated long term leases and their economic effects raise interesting research questions. Furthermore, a comparison of BOT method with other privatization methodologies gives an insight of advantages and drawbacks in the implementation. One question investigates if the SAA makes use of the previous experience on airport privatization in the world. The BOT implementations are evaluated in terms of capital investment funding, contractual design and the operation period acquired by the private sector via auctions. Moreover, the details of the Lease agreements following the expiration of BOT contracts at Istanbul Atatürk and Antalya airport are described to raise some questions on the contracts and the auctions took place. WWW.GAP-PROJEKT.DE _____________________________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Hans-Martin Niemeier Prof. Dr. Jürgen Müller Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer Hochschule Bremen HWR Berlin Internationale Fachhochschule Bad Honnef Werderstr. 73 Badensche Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonised Annual KPI Report 2020 Download
    KPI Annual Report 2020 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Version History: Version Date Remark Author 0.1 14.06.21 Initial Draft Barboff 0.5 21.06.21 Conclusions added, general edits Editorial Board 0.8 16.07.21 Editorial review Editorial Board 0.9 21.07.21 Final edits & review Barboff 1.0 03.08.21 Version for Publication Editorial Board 1.1 05.08.21 List of Abbreviations added Barboff Annual KPI Report Page 2 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Imprint Publisher: DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH on behalf of German Harmonisation Initiative A-CDM Germany Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Contacts: Erik Sinz & Sebastian Barboff, OZ/AA Airspace & Aerodrome Operations Editorial Board: Sebastian Barboff DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Boris Breug Flughafen München GmbH D-85326 München-Flughafen GERMANY Stefan Hilger Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide D-60547 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY Nico Ruwe Flughafen Stuttgart GmbH Flughafenstraße 32 D-70629 Stuttgart GERMANY Date: 05 August 2021 Pages: 29 All rights reserved. Any use outside of the limits set by the German Urheberrechtsgesetz requires written permission of the publisher. Violations will be prosecuted in civil and criminal court. This includes copying, translating, microfiching, and storing and processing in electronic systems. DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2021 Annual KPI Report Page 3 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Content 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 2 GERMAN HARMONISATION INITIATIVE A-CDM
    [Show full text]
  • Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020
    Activities of Lithuanian Airports 29 January 2020 Marius Gelžinis CEO, LITHUANIAN AIRPORTS GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Passenger projections by international organizations 2031 2033 2037 x2 x2 x2 in 15 years in total % 4.9 Global 4.6% Globally 8.2bn Globally per year traffic flow per year 2037 2037 m/yr. m/yr ) +550 +661 Local 1.9 trillion bln. 2.0% ( RPK 2.3% CAGR In Europe per year In Europe per year International Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 GROWTH IS ONLY GAINING MOMENTUM Projections by Aviation consultants, airlines and aircraft manufacturers TOP 10 aircraft orders by European airlines 2036 x2 +23 470 in 20 years 281 70 225 47 Number of aircraft 23 530 Traffic Flows 146 39 In total 41 030 144 32 2036 37 390 in 20 years 133 Aircraft 57% 25 orders 23 470 will execute orders Aircraft demand Source: Lithuanian Airports, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors do Planning to build new passenger terminals RIX TLL WAW KRK At the end of 2017, a tender In 2018 the initial plans for was launched for the 2018-2021 strategy: development of the airport visualization of the airport November 2018: master plan expansion of Tallinn Airport were launched. The terminal, with which Riga of Krakow Airport 2036 passenger terminal to be government is involved in Airport launched an approved Plėtros planai Plėtros implemented in 2018-2024 the project of development ambitious airport terminal until 2027 development project Sources: Riga Airport, 2019; Tallinn Airport, 2018; Warsaw Airport, 2018; Krakow Airport, 2018 2 What our competitors/neighbors
    [Show full text]
  • Tariffs for 2020
    TARIFFS FOR 2020 Tariff Name Page 1 Tariff For International Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 3 2 Tariff For Domestic Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 6 3 Tariff For Passenger Services 9 4 Tariff For Safety Precation 11 5 Tariff For Aircraft / Vehicles Marshalling 12 6 Tariff For Extension Of Airport Working Hours 14 7 Tariff For Passenger Boarding Bridge Services 15 8 Tariff For Ground Handling Services 17 9 Tariff For Refueling Concession 21 10 Tariff For Apron Vehicle Private Plate 22 11 Tariff For Entry Cards 25 12 Tariff For Communication Systems 28 13 Tariff For Communication System Allocation and Infrastructure Rights 30 14 Tariff For Power, Water, Sewerage, HVAC 32 15 Tariff For Tools, Equipment, Materials Allocation 36 16 Tariff For Terminal Area Allocation 39 17 Tariff For Land and Other Building Spaces Allocation 45 18 Tariff For Check-In, Transit Counters, Kiosk and Information Desks 47 19 Tariff For Flight Information Display System Usage 50 20 Tariff For Car Park 51 21 Tariff For Video and Photograph Shooting 55 22 Tariff For General Aviation Terminal 56 23 Tariff For Porter 58 24 Tariff For Medical Services 59 25 Tariff For Baggage Room Services 60 26 Tariff For Baggage Tracking Service 61 Activation : This tariff becomes valid upon the approval of General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) with effect from 1st January 2020 and it remains valid until the new tariff. Legal Disclaimer : These tariffs are valid for Airport/Terminal Operators. The official transcript of this text is in Turkish. The text in Turkish is applied in any legal dispute.
    [Show full text]