DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Supplementary Material Table S1. the List of Data References With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

10.1071/MF11232_AC © CSIRO 2012 Supplementary Material: Marine & Freshwater Research 63(5), 409-414., 2012 Supplementary Material Table S1. The list of data references with information of fish species names, habitat type, sampling periods, and diet analysis methods. Alabama = AL, Arkansas = AR, California = CA, Florida = FL, Georgia = GA, Indiana = IN, Iowa = IA, Kansas = KS, Kentucky = KY, Louisiana = LA, Michigan = MI, Missouri = MO, Mississippi = MS, New Mexico = NM, New York = NY, Oklahoma = OK, South Carolina = SC, South Dakota =SD, Tennessee = TN, Texas = TX, Virginia = VA, Wisconsin = WI, Wyoming = WY. Reference Species names State Water body Latitude and Aquatic Months Seasonal Diet (Common names) Longitude Habitat Sampled Samples Method (Decimal Degrees) (Yes/No) Atmar, G.L. and Stewart, K.W. 1972. Food, feeding Fundulus notatus TX Garza-Little Lat 33.093149 Lotic Seasonal Y PBV selectivity, and ecological efficiencies of Fundulus blackstripe topminnow Elm Reservoir Lon -96.981064 Means notatus (Cyprinodontidae). American Midland Naturalist 88: 76-89. DuRant, D.F., Shireman, J.V., and R.D. Gasaway. Fundulus seminolis FL Lake Wales and Lat 27.862207 Lentic Annual Y PBV 1979. Reproduction, growth, and food habits of Seminole killifish Star Lake Lon -81.696997 Monthly Seminole killifish, Fundulus seminolis, from two Means Central Florida Lakes. American Midland Naturalist 102: 127-133. Flemer, D.A. and Woolcott, W.S. 1966. Food habits Lepomis macrochirus VA Tuckahoe Creek Lat 37.543295 Lotic Annual Y PBA and distribution of the fishes of Tuckahoe Creek, Bluegill Lon -77.469563 Seasonal Virginia, with special emphasis on the bluegill, Means Lepomis m. macrochirus Rafinesque. Chesapeake Science 7: 75-89. Hambrick, P.S. and Hibbs, R.G. Jr. 1977. Feeding Cyprinella venusta LA Bayou Sara Lat 30.846528 Lentic April and Y PBV chronology and food habits of the blacktail shiner, Blacktail Shiner Lon -91.388261 June Notropis venustus (Cyprinidae), in Bayou Sara, Lousiana. The Southwestern Naturalist 22, 511 – 516. Harrington, R.W. and Harrington, E.S. 1972. Food of Fundulus confluentus FL Non-specific Lat 27.690877 Lentic Seasonal Y PBV female marsh killifish, Fundulus confluentus Goode Marsh killifish wetlands in Lon -80.602833 Means and Bean, in Florida. American Midland Naturalist 87: Central FL 492-502. Heins, D.C. and Clemmer, G.H. 1975. Ecology, foods Notropis longirostris MS Catahoula Creek Lat 30.385738 Lotic Seasonal Y PBV and feeding of the longnose shiner, Notropis Longnose shiner and Jourdan Lon -89.519773 Means longirostris (Hay), in Mississippi. American Midland River Naturalist 94, 284 – 295. 1 Hill, T.D., Duffy, W.G., and M.R. Thompson. 1995. Ictalurus punctatus SD Lake Oahe Lat 44.797690 Lentic Spring Y PBA, Food habits of channel catfish in Lake Oahe, South Channel catfish Lon -100.717444 and PBM Dakota. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10, 319 – 323. Summer Holder, D.S., and Powers, S.L. 2010. Life-history Notropis chrosomus GA Etowah River Lat 34.246858 Lotic Annual Y PBA aspects of the rainbow shiner, Notropis chrosomus Rainbow shiner Lon -84.48735 Monthly (Teleostei:Cyprinidae), in Northern Georgia. Means Southeastern Naturalist 9, 347 – 358. Kerns, H.A. and Bonneau, J.L. 2002. Aspects of the Notropis topeka KS Mill Creek Lat 37.863784 Lotic Annual Y PBA, life history and feeding habits of the Topeka shiner Topeka shiner Lon -96.848699 Means PBV (Notropis topeka) in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 105: 125-142. Lachner, E.A. 1950. Food, growth, and habits of Micropterus dolomieu NY East Koy Creek Lat 42.826514 Lotic August N PBV fingerling northern smallmouth bass, Micropterus Smallmouth bass Lon -78.089776 Only dolomieu dolomieu Lacépède, in trout waters of Western New York. The Journal of Wildlife Management 14, 50 – 56. Layher, W.G. and Bole, R.J. 1980. Food habits of the Pylodictis olivaris KS Milford Lat 39.133859 Lentic April Y PBV flathead catfish, Pylodictis olivaris (Rafinesque), in Flathead catfish Reservoir Lon -96.907994 through relation to length and season in a large Kansas November reservoir. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Sciences 83, 200 – 214. Markle, D.F., and Grant, G.C. 1970. The summer food Morone saxatilis VA James, York, Lat 37.943223 Lotic Seasonal Y PBV habits of young-of-the year striped bass in three Striped bass and Lon -77.173692 Means Virginia Rivers. Chesapeake Science 11, 50-54. Rappahannock Rivers Marsh, P.C. 1981. Food of channel catfish in the Ictalurus punctatus CA Coachella Canal Lat 33.832991 Lotic November N PBM Coachella Canal, California. Journal of the Arizona- Channel catfish Lon -116.543207 Only Nevada Academy of Science 16, 91 – 95. Mathur, D. 1977. Food habits and competitive Luxilus zonistius AL Halawakee Lat 32.743303 Lotic April and Y PBV relationships of the bandfin shiner in Halawakee Bandfin shiner Creek Lon -85.290091 September Creek, Alabama. American Midland Naturalist 97:89- 100. Mathur, D. and Ramsey, J.S. 1974. Food habits of the Notropis baileyi AL Halawakee Lat 32.743303 Lotic April and Y PBV rough shiner, Notropis bayleyi Suttkus and Raney, in Rough shiner Creek Lon -85.290091 September Halawakee Creek, Alabama. American Midland Naturalist 92, 84–93. Mayden, R.L., Burr, B.M., and S.L. Dewey. 1980. Noturus albater MO Several sites in Lat 37.140340 Lotic April N PBA Aspects of the life history of the Ozark madtom, Ozark madtom Ozark region of Lon -93.813986 Only Noturus albater, in Southeastern Missouri Southwestern, (Pices:Ictaluridae). American Midland Naturalist 104, MO 335 – 340. Mendelson, J. 1975. Feeding relationships among Notropis dorsalis WI Roxbury Creek Lat 43.270799 Lotic Annual Y PBA species of Notropis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in a Bigmouth shiner Lon -89.727350 Means Wisconsin stream. Ecological Monographs 45: 199- Notropis stramineus 232. Sand shiner Cyprinella spiloptera Spotfin shiner Notropis atherinoides Emerald shiner 2 Murphy, G.W., Newcomb, T.J., D. Orth, and S. Catostomus commersonii VA Shenandoah Lat 38.532380 Lotic Annual Y PBM Reeser. 2005. Food habits of selected fish species in White sucker River Lon -78.279613 Monthly the Shenandoah River Basin, Virginia. Proceedings of Micropterus dolomieu Means the Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Smallmouth bass Fish and Wildlife Agencies 59: 325-335. Lepomis auriuis Redbreast sunfish O'Kelley, C.T. and Powers, S.L. 2007. Life history Hypentelium etowanum GA Shoal and Lat 34.154437 Lotic Annual Y PBM aspects of Hypentelium etowanum (Alabama hog Alabama hogsucker Moore Creeks Lon -84.655355 Monthly sucker) (Actinopterygii: Catostomidae) in Northern Means Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist 6: 479-490. Paterson, G., Drouillard, K.G., and G.D. Haffner. Ambloplites rupestris MI Lake St. Claire Lat 42.453284 Lentic October N PBA 2006. Quantifying resource partitioning in Rock bass Lon -82.698970 Only Centrarchids with stable isotope analysis. Limnology Lepomis macrochirus and Oceanography 51, 1038 – 1044. Bluegill Phillips, E. and Kilambi, R.V. 1996. Food habits of Cottus carolinae AR Non-specific Lat 35.973995 Lotic Annual Y PBA four benthic fish species (Etheostoma spectable, Banded sculpin streams in Lon -93.859952 Monthly Percina caprodes, Noturus exilis, Cottus carolinae) Noturus exilis Northwest Means from northwest Arkansas streams. The Southwestern Slender madtom Arkansas Naturalist 41, 69 – 73. Percina caprodes Logperch Quist, M.C., Bower, M., and W.A. Hubert. 2006. Semotilus atromaculatus WY White River Lat 41.045459 Lotic July Only N PBM Summer food habits and trophic overlap of roundtail Creek chub Lon -107.641675 chub and creek chub in Muddy Creek, Wyoming. The Gila robusta Southwestern Naturalist 51: 22-27. Roundtail chub Reisen, W.K. 1972. The influence of organic drift on Notropis lutipinnis SC Praters Creek Lat 34.883690 Lotic Annual Y PBM the food habits and life history of the yellowfin shiner, Yellowfin shiner Lon -82.697268 Means Notropis lutipinnis (Jordan and Brayton). American Midland Naturalist 88: 376-383. Ryon, M.G. 1986. The life history of Etheostoma Etheostoma trisella GA, TN Conasauga Lat 34.982186 Lotic Annual Y PBA trisella (Pisces: Percidae). American Midland Trispot darter River Lon -84.984638 Seasonal Naturalist 115: 73-86. Means Scalet, C.G. 1977. Summer food habits of sympatric Micropterus punctulatus OK Blue River, Lat 34.786421 Lotic Summer N PBV stream populations of spotted bass and largemouth Spotted bass Canyon, Little Lon -96.648739 Only bass. The Southwestern Naturalist 21, 493 – 501. Micropterus salmoides Fast Blue, Largemouth bass Pennington Creeks Scott, J.H. and Mayden, R.L. 2008. Life history of the Cyprinella trichoistia AL Coosa River Lat 33.274104 Lotic Annual Y PBA tricolor shiner, Cyprinella trichroistia (Teleostei: Tricolor shiner system Lon -85.844686 Means Cyprinidae), in Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist 7:69- 80. Starnes, L.B. and Starnes, W.C. 1985. Ecology and life Cottus carolinae TN Little River Lat 35.726905 Lotic Annual Y PBA history of the mountain madtom, Noturus eleutherus Banded sculpin Lon -83.712965 Monthly (Pisces:Ictaluridae). American Midland Naturalist 114, Etheostoma blennioides Means 331 – 341. Greenside darter Etheostoma rufilineatum Redline darter 3 Noturus eleutherus Mountain madtom Starrett, W.C. 1950. Food relationships of the Campostoma anomalum IA Iowa River Lat 42.089894 Lotic Annual Y PBV minnows of the Des Moines River, Iowa. Ecology 31, Mexican stoneroller Lon -93.989465 Seasonal 216 – 233. Hybognathus hankinsoni Means Brassy minnow Phenacobius mirabilis Suckermouth minnow Pimephales notatus Bluntnose minnow Pimephales promelas Fathead minnow Pimephales vigilax Bullhead minnow Notropis stramineus Sand shiner Macrhybopsis aestivalis Speckled chub Semotilus atromaculatus Creek chub Notropis dorsalis Bigmouth shiner Luxilus cornutus Common shiner Notropis rubellus Rosyface shiner Cyprinella spiloptera Spotfin shiner Sutton, T.M. and Ney, J. 2002. Trophic resource Morone saxatilis VA Smith Mountain Lat 37.060571 Lentic Seasonal Y PBM overlap between age-0 striped bass and largemouth Striped bass Lake Lon -79.604015 Means bass in Smith Lake, Virginia. North American Journal Micropterus salmoides of Fisheries Management 22, 1250 – 1259.
Recommended publications
  • CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point

    CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point

    July 2004 Volume 65, MISSOURIMISSOURI Issue 7 CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point Behind the Scenes ave you ever wondered who takes care of all the facilities and infrastructure that are available to H you on conservation areas? Behind the scenes of the wonderful conservation programs and facilities you enjoy are many dedicated men and women playing a vital support role. These men and women are members of the staff of the Design & Development Section of the Conservation Department’s Administrative Services Division. They provide professional engineering, archi- tectural, and construction-maintenance services to the Department and the citizens of Missouri. The Missouri Department of Conservation owns or leases more than a thousand conservation areas located throughout the State. These areas contain nearly 500 miles of wetland levees, 75 shooting ranges, 500 boat launching ramps, 3,000 fishing lakes and ponds, 1,000 miles of roads, 2,500 parking lots, 3,000 buildings and other infrastructure, all of which must be maintained. Over the past few decades, the Department has focused on improving the conservation areas acquired as part of the “Design for Conservation” plan implemented with the passage of the 1/8th percent conservation sales Cliff White taxin 1976. The Department constructed nature centers, fishing lakes, wetlands, shooting ranges, fish hatcheries, electrical, and mechanical engineers, as well an archi- trails, river and lake public use access areas and associ- tect and drafting technicians, produce construction ated infrastructure so that that the public could make drawings of the design. better use of these areas. Also, the Conservation Department’s contract spe- In designing these public use facilities, the Department’s cialist and clerical staff have to prepare final contract Design & Development staff worked closely with resource documents for bidding, and contract supervisors would managers and biologists to acquire a good understanding ensure quality construction by the carpenters and heavy of the biological functions of a project.
  • Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The

    Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist WATER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 0908 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 8 IBI sample collection ............................................. 8 Habitat measures............................................... 10 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 15 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 19 Designation of guilds....................................... 20 Results and discussion................................................ 22 Sampling sites and collection results . 22 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 41 1. Number of native species ................................
  • Kansas Stream Fishes

    Kansas Stream Fishes

    A POCKET GUIDE TO Kansas Stream Fishes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ By Jessica Mounts Illustrations © Joseph Tomelleri Sponsored by Chickadee Checkoff, Westar Energy Green Team, Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism, Kansas Alliance for Wetlands & Streams, and Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 • Fish Anatomy • 3 • Species Accounts: Sturgeons (Family Acipenseridae) • 4 ■ Shovelnose Sturgeon • 5 ■ Pallid Sturgeon • 6 Minnows (Family Cyprinidae) • 7 ■ Southern Redbelly Dace • 8 ■ Western Blacknose Dace • 9 ©Ryan Waters ■ Bluntface Shiner • 10 ■ Red Shiner • 10 ■ Spotfin Shiner • 11 ■ Central Stoneroller • 12 ■ Creek Chub • 12 ■ Peppered Chub / Shoal Chub • 13 Plains Minnow ■ Silver Chub • 14 ■ Hornyhead Chub / Redspot Chub • 15 ■ Gravel Chub • 16 ■ Brassy Minnow • 17 ■ Plains Minnow / Western Silvery Minnow • 18 ■ Cardinal Shiner • 19 ■ Common Shiner • 20 ■ Bigmouth Shiner • 21 ■ • 21 Redfin Shiner Cover Photo: Photo by Ryan ■ Carmine Shiner • 22 Waters. KDWPT Stream ■ Golden Shiner • 22 Survey and Assessment ■ Program collected these Topeka Shiner • 23 male Orangespotted Sunfish ■ Bluntnose Minnow • 24 from Buckner Creek in Hodgeman County, Kansas. ■ Bigeye Shiner • 25 The fish were catalogued ■ Emerald Shiner • 26 and returned to the stream ■ Sand Shiner • 26 after the photograph. ■ Bullhead Minnow • 27 ■ Fathead Minnow • 27 ■ Slim Minnow • 28 ■ Suckermouth Minnow • 28 Suckers (Family Catostomidae) • 29 ■ River Carpsucker •
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
  • COPEIA February 1

    COPEIA February 1

    2000, No. 1COPEIA February 1 Copeia, 2000(1), pp. 1±10 Phylogenetic Relationships in the North American Cyprinid Genus Cyprinella (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) Based on Sequences of the Mitochondrial ND2 and ND4L Genes RICHARD E. BROUGHTON AND JOHN R. GOLD Shiners of the cyprinid genus Cyprinella are abundant and broadly distributed in eastern and central North America. Thirty species are currently placed in the genus: these include six species restricted to Mexico and three barbeled forms formerly placed in different cyprinid genera (primarily Hybopsis). We conducted a molecular phylogenetic analysis of all species of Cyprinella found in the United States, using complete nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial, protein-coding genes ND2 and ND4L. Maximum-parsimony analysis recovered a single most-parsimonious tree for Cyprinella. Among historically recognized, nonbarbeled Cyprinella, the mitochondrial (mt) DNA tree indicated that basal lineages in Cyprinella are comprised largely of species with linear breeding tubercles and that are endemic to Atlantic and/or Gulf slope drainages, whereas derived lineages are comprised of species broadly distrib- uted in the Mississippi basin and the American Southwest. The Alabama Shiner, C. callistia, was basal in the mtDNA tree, although a monophyletic Cyprinella that in- cluded C. callistia was not supported in more than 50% of bootstrap replicates. There was strong bootstrap support (89%) for a clade that included all species of nonbarbeled Cyprinella (except C. callistia) and two barbeled species, C. labrosa and C. zanema. The third barbeled species, C. monacha, fell outside of Cyprinella sister to a species of Hybopsis. Within Cyprinella were a series of well-supported species groups, although in some cases bootstrap support for relationships among groups was below 50%.
  • Factors Influencing Community Structure of Riverine

    Factors Influencing Community Structure of Riverine

    FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF RIVERINE ORGANISMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPERILED SPECIES MANAGEMENT by David S. Ruppel, M.S. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Aquatic Resources and Integrative Biology May 2019 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair Noland H. Martin Joseph A. Veech Kenneth G. Ostrand James A. Stoeckel COPYRIGHT by David S. Ruppel 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, David S. Ruppel, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank my major advisor, Timothy H. Bonner, who has been a great mentor throughout my time at Texas State University. He has passed along his vast knowledge and has provided exceptional professional guidance and support with will benefit me immensely as I continue to pursue an academic career. I also thank my committee members Dr. Noland H. Martin, Dr. Joseph A. Veech, Dr. Kenneth G. Ostrand, and Dr. James A. Stoeckel who provided great comments on my dissertation and have helped in shaping manuscripts that will be produced in the future from each one of my chapters.
  • Spatial Organization of Fish Communities in the St. Lawrence

    Spatial Organization of Fish Communities in the St. Lawrence

    Hydrobiologia (2018) 809:155–173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3457-z PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER Spatial organisation of fish communities in the St. Lawrence River: a test for longitudinal gradients and spatial heterogeneities in a large river system Aline Foubert . Fre´de´ric Lecomte . Pierre Legendre . Mathieu Cusson Received: 15 February 2017 / Revised: 8 November 2017 / Accepted: 28 November 2017 / Published online: 6 December 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017 Abstract Typified by heterogeneous habitats, large 299,662 individuals from 76 fish species captured in rivers host diversified communities throughout their 1,051 sites. Results from diversity indices and multi- course. As the spatial organisation of fish communities variate analysis revealed a gradual downstream within these ecosystems remains little studied, longi- increase in taxonomic diversity, and a gradual change tudinal gradients and spatial heterogeneities of fish of the community structure along the river. In addition, diversity were analysed in the large temperate St. we observed different fish communities within fluvial Lawrence River, Canada. We used two distinct lakes and corridors and found significant differences in datasets obtained from either seine nets or gillnets fish community structure between opposite shores. from governmental standardised fish surveys The fish communities described along the river using (1995–2012) consisting of a total of seine nets are spatially more heterogeneous than when described using gillnets. This discrepancy is likely resulting both from the more mobile species targeted Handling editor: Fernando M. Pelicice by gillnets and sampling sites located farther from the Contribution to the ‘‘Chaire de recherche sur les espe`ces shallower shoreline habitat targeted by seine nets.
  • Underwater Observation and Habitat Utilization of Three Rare Darters

    Underwater Observation and Habitat Utilization of Three Rare Darters

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2010 Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee Robert Trenton Jett University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Jett, Robert Trenton, "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/636 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Trenton Jett entitled "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. James L. Wilson, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: David A. Etnier, Jason G.
  • Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M

    Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 8 1977 Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M. Bounds Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Billy M. Johnson Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bounds, Steve M.; Beadles, John K.; and Johnson, Billy M. (1977) "Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 8. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/8 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ! Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 8 Fishes ofRandolph County, Arkansas STEVE M. BOUNDS,' JOHN K.BEADLESand BILLYM.JOHNSON Divisionof Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University I State University, Arkansas 72467 ! ABSTRACT Asurvey of the fishes of Randolph County in northcentral Arkansas was made between June 1973 and March 1977. Field collections, literature records, and museum specimens re- n vealed the ichthyofauna of Randolph County to be composed of 128 species distributed among 24 families.
  • Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M

    Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 27 Article 11 1973 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M. Buchanan University of Arkansas – Fort Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Buchanan, Thomas M. (1973) "Checklist of Arkansas Fishes," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 27 , Article 11. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol27/iss1/11 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 27 [1973], Art. 11 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes THOMAS M.BUCHANAN Department ot Natural Science, Westark Community College, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72901 ABSTRACT Arkansas has a large, diverse fish fauna consisting of 193 species known to have been collected from the state's waters. The checklist is an up-to-date listing of both native and introduced species, and is intended to correct some of the longstanding and more recent erroneous Arkansas records.
  • Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5

    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5

    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Prepared by: Amy J. Benson, Colette C. Jacono, Pam L. Fuller, Elizabeth R. McKercher, U.S. Geological Survey 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 and Myriah M. Richerson Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. 7315 North Atlantic Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 29 February 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………... ...1 Aquatic Macrophytes ………………………………………………………………….. ... 2 Submersed Plants ………...………………………………………………........... 7 Emergent Plants ………………………………………………………….......... 13 Floating Plants ………………………………………………………………..... 24 Fishes ...…………….…………………………………………………………………..... 29 Invertebrates…………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Mollusks …………………………………………………………………………. 57 Bivalves …………….………………………………………………........ 57 Gastropods ……………………………………………………………... 63 Nudibranchs ………………………………………………………......... 68 Crustaceans …………………………………………………………………..... 69 Amphipods …………………………………………………………….... 69 Cladocerans …………………………………………………………..... 70 Copepods ……………………………………………………………….. 71 Crabs …………………………………………………………………...... 72 Crayfish ………………………………………………………………….. 73 Isopods ………………………………………………………………...... 75 Shrimp ………………………………………………………………….... 75 Amphibians and Reptiles …………………………………………………………….. 76 Amphibians ……………………………………………………………….......... 81 Toads and Frogs