DOCSLIB.ORG

Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 8 1977 Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M. Bounds Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Billy M. Johnson Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bounds, Steve M.; Beadles, John K.; and Johnson, Billy M. (1977) "Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 8. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/8 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ! Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 8 Fishes ofRandolph County, Arkansas STEVE M. BOUNDS,' JOHN K.BEADLESand BILLYM.JOHNSON Divisionof Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University I State University, Arkansas 72467 ! ABSTRACT Asurvey of the fishes of Randolph County in northcentral Arkansas was made between June 1973 and March 1977. Field collections, literature records, and museum specimens re- n vealed the ichthyofauna of Randolph County to be composed of 128 species distributed among 24 families. Cyprinidae was the largest family,being represented by 34 species while Percidae was represented by 24 species. ! Randolph County is composed of Ozark Uplands and Coastal Plain areas. All of the stream systems flow into the Black River system with the exception of VillageCreek in the southeastern corner of the county which flows into White River. The major streams in the : county are Black, Current, Eleven Point, Fourche, and Spring Rivers, and Jane's Creek. : INTRODUCTION ients, particularly in their upper reaches, and runoffis rapid. i Randolph Couny lies whollywithin the White River basin. Allex- During the past decade Randolph County, Arkansas has expe- cept a small southeastern portion of the county is drained by the rienced a population growth of more than 100%, particularly in the Black River and its tributaries. VillageCreek arises in the southeast- Ozark region. This has resulted in changes inland use which subse- ern corner of the county and flows directly into the White River quently cause changes in the river and stream systems. Forests have (Lamonds, Hines. and Plebuch, 1969). been cleared resulting in altered temperature and runoff cycles, tur- Current River flows along the eastern boundary of the county for bidity, and siltation rates. Much of the natural vegetation has been 63 km before it joins the Black River 6.4 km east of Pocahontas. As replaced byrow crops and pasture. The increase in the use of agricul- the river enters the county, it leaves the Ozark escarpment to become ture chemicals, pesticides, and fertilizers has contributed to changes a meandering lowland stream but maintains its rapid clear flow. The within the aquatic environments. river is almost continuous pools separated by a few short riffles. In In1962, Randolph County was designated as eligible to receive as- the upper portion of the county the substrate is composed of gravel sistance under the Area Redevelopment Act. A product of this was while the lower portionis composed entirely of sand and mud. the Fourche Creek Watershed Project. Floodwater-retarding struc- Jane's Creek is a clear, spring-fed, Ozark stream that arises in the tures were to be constructed in the upland streams while the lowland northwestern corner of the county, near the Missouri line, and flows streams were to be channeled foragricultural drainage. As of Febru- into Spring River near Ravenden, Arkansas, approximately 40 km ary, 1977. fivefloodwater-retarding structures and all channelization below its origin. The substrate in the pools varies from solid rock in had been completed. the upper reaches to fine gravel and sand at Spring River. The riffle The purpose of this study was to report the fish species within the substrate is composed of coarse gravel and chert. The mean stream county before further environmental alterations are made. gradient was calculated to be 2.8 m/km. Spring River forms the southwestern boundary of county. Itflows southeastward through the Ozarks before entering the Coastal Plain. METHODS It maintains a clear moderate flow for 5 more km before it enters the Black River at Black Rock. Arkansas. Most of the collections were taken by seines ranging in size from The Eleven Point and Fourche Rivers drain the largest portion of = 1.2 x 3.0 m (bar measure mesh 3.2 mm) to 1.8 x 15.2 m (bar the county. The Eleven Point enters the western portion of the measure mesh =6.4 mm). Gillnets with a mesh of 37 mm to 76 mm county from Missouri, flows rapidly through the Ozarks for 50 km, were used as were various hook and line methods. Museum speci- and empties into the Spring River near Black Rock, Arkansas. mens collected by Green ( 1973) and Fowler (1972) were examined. Fourche enters the eastern portion of the county from Missouri, Collected fish were fixed in 10% formalin for three days, washed, flows slowly through the Ozarks before entering the Coastal Plain, and stored in40% isopropanol. and empties into the Black River at Pocahontas, Arkansas. Classification was accomplished with the keys of Pflieger (1968), The Black River enters the county 9km south of Biggers, Arkan- Moore (1968). Miller and Robison (1973), and Pflieger (1975). sas, flows westward to Pocahontas, turns southwestward and flows Nomenclature is in accordance with Bailey, et al. (1970) withthe ex- along the Fall Line separating the Interior Highlands and Coastal ceptions of Nolropis chrvsncephalus. Nolropis emiliae, and Lepomis Plain, and leaves the county at Black Rock, Arkansas. gulosus. Two small creeks, Little Running Water and BigRunning Water, drain the southeastern portion of the county that is not drained by DESCRIPTION OF AREA Village Creek. These creeks are deltaic and were extensively chan- neled, consequently, they tend to become dry during the hot summer Randolph County is located in northeast-northcentral Arkansas months. between Oregon County, Missouri, to the north, and Lawrence Randolph County has an average annual temperature of 15° C. Jan- County. Arkansas, to the south. It covers an area of 1650 km'. The uary is usually the coldest month withan average temperature of3.5° elevation ranges from 76 m in the southeastern section to nearly 305 C. The average annual precipitation is 121 cm. Rainfall is usually m in the northwestern section (Harper. 1972). plentiful and well distributed over the county throughout the year The county is divided into two distinct physiographic regions, the (Hawkins. 1976). Coastal Plain and the Interior Highlands. The Coastal Plain is charac- terized by nearly flat topography. Because of the flat terrain the A OF THE FISHES OF streams are sluggish and runoff is slow. The Highlands is CHECK-LIST Interior RANDOLPH COUNTY,ARKANSAS characterized by hillydissected uplands. Streams have steep grad- Petromyzontidae (Lampreys) "Present address: Dept. Science. Crowley's Ridge College, Para- gould, Ark.72450. Ichthyomyzon caxtaneus Girard. Chestnut lamprey. Academy Proceedings, XXXI, Arkansas of Science Vol. 1977 21 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 1977 21 1 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 8 Steve M.Bounds, John K. Beadles and BillyM. Johnson Ichthyomyzon gagei Hubbs and Trautman. Southern brook lamprey. Notropis whipplei(Girard). Steelcolor shiner. Lampetra aepyptera (Abbott). Least brook lamprey. Notropis zonatus (Putman). Bleeding shiner. Acipenseridae (Sturgeons) Opsopoeodus emiliae Hay. Pugnose minnow. Scaphirhynchus platorynchus (Rafinesque). Shovelnose sturgeon. Phoxinus erythrogaster (Rafinesque). Southern redbelly dace Polyodontidae (Paddlefishes) Pimephales notatus (Rafinesque). Bluntnose minnow. Polyodon spathula (Walbaum). Paddlefish. Pimephales tenellus (Girard).Slim minnow. Lepisosteidae (Gars) Pimephales vigilax(Bairdand Girard). Bullhead minnow. Lepisosteus oculatus (Winchell).Spotted gar. Semotilus atromaculalus (Mitchill).Creek chub. Lepisosteus osseus (Linnaeus). Longnose gar. Catostomidae (Suckers) Lepisosteus platostomus Rafinesque. Shortnose gar. Carpiodes carpio (Rafinesque). River carpsucker. Lepisosteus spatula Lacepede. Alligatorgar. Carpiodes cyprinus (Lesueur). Quillback. Amiidae (Bowfins) Carpiodes velifer(Rafinesque). Highfin carpsucker. Amia calva Linnaeus. Bowfin. Catostomus commersoni (Lacepede). White sucker. Anguillidae(Eels) Cycleptus elongatus (Lesueur). Blue sucker. Anguillarostrata (Lesueur). American eel. Erimyzon oblongus (Mitchill).Creek chubsucker. Clupeidae (Herrings) Hypentelium nigricans (Lesueur). Northern hog sucker. Alosa chrysochloris (Rafinesque). Skipjack herring. Ictiobus bubalus (Rafinesque). Smallmouth buffalo. Dorosoma cepedianum (Lesueur). Gizzad shad. Ictiobus cyprinellus (Valenciennes). Bigmouth buffalo. Hiodontidae (Mooneyes) Ictiobus niger (Rafinesque). Black buffalo.
Recommended publications
  • CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point

    CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point

    July 2004 Volume 65, MISSOURIMISSOURI Issue 7 CONSERVATIONIST Vantage Point Behind the Scenes ave you ever wondered who takes care of all the facilities and infrastructure that are available to H you on conservation areas? Behind the scenes of the wonderful conservation programs and facilities you enjoy are many dedicated men and women playing a vital support role. These men and women are members of the staff of the Design & Development Section of the Conservation Department’s Administrative Services Division. They provide professional engineering, archi- tectural, and construction-maintenance services to the Department and the citizens of Missouri. The Missouri Department of Conservation owns or leases more than a thousand conservation areas located throughout the State. These areas contain nearly 500 miles of wetland levees, 75 shooting ranges, 500 boat launching ramps, 3,000 fishing lakes and ponds, 1,000 miles of roads, 2,500 parking lots, 3,000 buildings and other infrastructure, all of which must be maintained. Over the past few decades, the Department has focused on improving the conservation areas acquired as part of the “Design for Conservation” plan implemented with the passage of the 1/8th percent conservation sales Cliff White taxin 1976. The Department constructed nature centers, fishing lakes, wetlands, shooting ranges, fish hatcheries, electrical, and mechanical engineers, as well an archi- trails, river and lake public use access areas and associ- tect and drafting technicians, produce construction ated infrastructure so that that the public could make drawings of the design. better use of these areas. Also, the Conservation Department’s contract spe- In designing these public use facilities, the Department’s cialist and clerical staff have to prepare final contract Design & Development staff worked closely with resource documents for bidding, and contract supervisors would managers and biologists to acquire a good understanding ensure quality construction by the carpenters and heavy of the biological functions of a project.
  • Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M

    Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 27 Article 11 1973 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M. Buchanan University of Arkansas – Fort Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Buchanan, Thomas M. (1973) "Checklist of Arkansas Fishes," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 27 , Article 11. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol27/iss1/11 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 27 [1973], Art. 11 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes THOMAS M.BUCHANAN Department ot Natural Science, Westark Community College, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72901 ABSTRACT Arkansas has a large, diverse fish fauna consisting of 193 species known to have been collected from the state's waters. The checklist is an up-to-date listing of both native and introduced species, and is intended to correct some of the longstanding and more recent erroneous Arkansas records.
  • A Legacy of Neglect: the Ozark National Scenic Riverways

    A Legacy of Neglect: the Ozark National Scenic Riverways

    A Legacy of Neglect: The Ozark National Scenic Riverways Susan Flader Missouri’s Current River and its tributary, the Jacks Fork, were the nation’s first fed- erally protected rivers. Congressionally authorized in 1964 as the Ozark National Scenic Riverways (ONSR), they served as a prototype for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968. But in May 2011 ONSR was identified by American Rivers as one of America’s ten most endangered rivers, owing to a history of inadequate management by the National Park Service (NPS). The spring-fed, bluff-lined Current and Jacks Fork are the preeminent “float streams” in a state where floating, fishing, and camping by johnboat or canoe have long been favorite pastimes (Figure 1). The state’s first Republican governor since Reconstruction, Herbert Hadley, led well-publicized float trips on Current River as early as 1909 in an effort to pro- mote tourism and build support for a state park system. When Missouri acquired its first state parks in 1924, they included Round Spring and Big Spring on the Current River and Alley Spring on the Jacks Fork. The rivers early attracted admirers from afar; Aldo Leopold came from Wisconsin in 1926 to float the Current from Van Buren to Doniphan with his brothers (Leopold 1953; Figure 2), then in 1929 bought a shanty on its bank as a base for annual hunts, years before he acquired his celebrated shack in the sand country of Wisconsin. Like many other rivers that eventually won designation as national wild and scenic rivers, the Current was threatened by proposed hydroelectric dams.
  • Fishes of the Eleven Point River Within Arkansas Michael B

    Fishes of the Eleven Point River Within Arkansas Michael B

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 19 1977 Fishes of the Eleven Point River Within Arkansas Michael B. Johnson Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Michael B. and Beadles, John K. (1977) "Fishes of the Eleven Point River Within Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 19. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/19 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 19 Fishes of the Eleven Point River Within Arkansas B.MICHAELJOHNSON and JOHN K.BEADLES Division of Biological Sciences Arkansas State University State University, Arkansas 72467 ABSTRACT A survey of the fishes of the Eleven Point River and its tributaries was made between 31 January 1976 and 13 February 1977.
  • Fish Communities of the Buffalo River Basin and Nearby Basins of Arkansas and Their Relation to Selected Environmental Factors, 2001-2002

    Fish Communities of the Buffalo River Basin and Nearby Basins of Arkansas and Their Relation to Selected Environmental Factors, 2001-2002

    Fish Communities of the Buffalo River Basin and Nearby Basins of Arkansas and their Relation to Selected Environmental Factors, 2001-2002 Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5119 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey B A C D F E A - Richland Creek near Witts Springs B - Longear sunfish—common throughout the Ozark Plateaus C - Stippled darter—primarily restricted to small streams and is endemic to the Ozark Plateaus D - Banded sculpin (top) and Ozark sculpin (bottom)—banded sculpins are widely distributed throughout the Ozark Plateaus. Ozark sculpins are less widely distributed and are endemic to the Ozark Plateaus E - Smallmouth bass—an important game fish found throughout most of the Ozark Plateaus F - Buffalo River just downstream from Rush Creek (photograph by Billy G. Justus, U.S. Geological Survey) Fish Communities of the Buffalo River Basin and Nearby Basins of Arkansas and their Relation to Selected Environmental Factors, 2001-2002 By James C. Petersen Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5119 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 200X For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • Water Resources of Randolph and Lawrence Counties, Arkansas

    Water Resources of Randolph and Lawrence Counties, Arkansas

    Water Resources of Randolph and Lawrence Counties, Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1879-B Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission Water Resources of Randolph and Lawrence Counties, Arkansas By A. G. LAMONDS, MARION S. MINES, and RAYMOND 0. PLEBUCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1879-B Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Pr'nting Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_ ----_-__--_--_--_-_-_--_-____-___----________-_____.-_- Bl Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Purpose.__--_____--_-____-__--________________________-___-_- 2 Acknowledgments. _ ___________________________________________ 2 The area.____________________________________________________ ? Surface-water resources.._-----____-_-_-_-___-_-_-_______________--_ ? Availability. __________________________________________________ fi Low-flow frequency._______________________________________ 5 Flow duration___________________________________________ 10 Floods.__________________________________________________ 12 Quality. ________------______--_-____._---____._-__-____-_-_- 14 Chemical and physical quality.-_____-_-___-___-_-_-_____-__ 14 Bacterial quality-_________________________________________
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Frecklebelly Madtom (Noturus Munitus)

    Species Status Assessment Report for the Frecklebelly Madtom (Noturus Munitus)

    Species Status Assessment Report for the Frecklebelly Madtom (Noturus munitus) Version 1.2 Credit: B.H. Bauer August 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Frecklebelly Madtom Species Status Assessment Team: Michael Marshall (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Evan Collins (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Alabama Ecological Services Office), and Nicole Rankin (USFWS, South Atlantic-Gulf and Mississippi Regional Office). We would also like to recognize and thank the following individuals who provided substantive information, photographs, and insights for our Species Status Assessment. Thank you to Matthew Wagner (Mississippi Museum of Natural Science), Brett Albanese (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Mary Freeman (U.S. Geological Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center), Matthew Duplessis (Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries), Daniel Schwarz (USFWS Private John Allen National Fish Hatchery), Steven Rider (Alabama Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries), and David Neely (Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute). Additionally, valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document were provided by Anakela Popp (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Bernard Kuhajda (Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute), Peggy Shute (Conservation Fisheries, Inc), Amy Carson (USFWS, Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office), and Erin Rivenbark (USFWS, South Atlantic-Gulf and Mississippi Regional Office). We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. SSA Report – Frecklebelly Madtom ii August 2020 SUMMARY OF VERSION UPDATES The changes from version 1.0 (December 2019) and version 1.1 (March 2020) are minor and do not change the assessment of risk.
  • Spring River

    Spring River

    Spring River SALEM Mammoth Spring 9 Dam #1 Mammoth Lassiter 1 mile Spring Hardy Trout FishingWalk-in Areas • Spring River Cold Springs Access Spring River 2 miles 289 A fishing license (Page 5) and a trout permit are required to retain trout 342from any state waters. Licenses or permits are not required for children under 16. 3.5 miles Regulations Dam #3 Jim Hinkle/ There is a daily limit of five trout. Only twoSpring Brown trout, River 16 inches or longer may be taken. Only two Cutthroat trout, 16 inches or longer may be taken. State Fish Spring River SALEM MammothHatchery Spring Spring river (map below) 9 Dam #1 Spring River From 100 yards below Dam No.1 at Mammoth Spring State Park Mammothto the mouth of63 Myatt Creek. Anglers may use Lassiterno more than two fishing rods1 mileand must attendBayou them at all times.Spring No otherHardy devices may be used to Walk-in Cold Springs catch fish. Access • Cold Springs Access: Handicapped-accessible fishing2 miles pier available. 289 6 miles 342 Spring River SpringSALEM River SALEM 3.5 miles Mammoth Spring Mammoth Spring 9 9 DamDam #1 #3 Spring River SALEM Jim Hinkle/ Dam #1 Spring River Mammoth Spring Mammoth SALEM LassiterSpring9 River 1 mile Hardy Mammoth Spring Mammoth Spring 9 1 mile Walk-inHardyState Fish Dam #1Cold Springs Lassiter Spring AccessHatchery Walk-in Dam #1 Mammoth Cold Springs 1 mile 2 miles Hardy Access Mammoth Lassiter 289 Spring 1 mile Walk-inHardy Cold Springs63 Lassiter 2 miles Spring Bayou 342 Walk-in Cold Springs Access 289 3.5 miles Access 2 miles Dam #3 2 miles
  • Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas Joe F

    Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas Joe F

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 28 Article 9 1974 Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas Joe F. Green Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Green, Joe F. and Beadles, John K. (1974) "Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 28 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol28/iss1/9 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 28 [1974], Art. 9 Ichthyofaunal Survey ofthe Current River Within Arkansas JOE F. GREEN* and JOHN K. BEADLES Divisionof Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, Arkansas 72467 ABSTRACT Current River is a clear predominantly spring-fed stream draining the southeastern face of the Ozark escarpment. Beginning at Montauk Springs, Dent County, Missouri, it meanders southward for 180 km to the Arkansas-Missouri state line.
  • Recent Collections of Fishes from the Spring River Drainage in Northeast Arkansas Steve C

    Recent Collections of Fishes from the Spring River Drainage in Northeast Arkansas Steve C

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 41 Article 25 1987 Recent Collections of Fishes from the Spring River Drainage in Northeast Arkansas Steve C. Baker Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Michael L. Armstrong Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Steve C. and Armstrong, Michael L. (1987) "Recent Collections of Fishes from the Spring River Drainage in Northeast Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 41 , Article 25. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol41/iss1/25 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 41 [1987], Art. 25 GENERAL NOTES RECENT COLLECTIONS OF FISHES FROM THE SPRING RIVER DRAINAGE INNORTHEAST ARKANSAS Several ichthyofaunal surveys have been conducted in the Spring River of Arkansas. Meek (1894) initiallycollected fish insome tributaries of the Upper Spring River. Buchanan (1973) sampled throughout the drainage in developing his Key to the Fishes of Arkansas.
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007

    Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007

    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.