DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Budget Briefing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Budget Briefing PROPOSED FY 2019 – 2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 2019 CAPITAL BUDGET PROPOSAL Program Size 2019-2023 CIP is $2.9 billion Funding Sources The primary source of funding is federal funds There has been no State capital bill since 2009 CTA and RTA are also issuing bonds to fund capital projects The new ride-hailing fee imposed by the City of Chicago will allow CTA to raise $179M in bond funding Types of Projects Funded Transformative capital projects (RPM, RLE,YNB) Better customer amenities (ADA accessibility, wider stations & canopies) Modernize bus and rail car fleet State of Good Repair projects Economic Impact to CTA and City Capacity enhancement allow for expanded ridership CTA capital program drives economic development throughout the City DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 2 CTA FY 2019- 2023 Project Solicitation DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 2019-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUNDING SOURCES CTA has a diverse source of Federal and Local funds for its $2.9 billion capital plan The State has not approved a capital funding program since 2009 The State historically has provided approximately $200M per year in funding The new ride-hailing fee will pay for bonds issued to fund track work and safety and security projects FY 2019-2023 Sources of Funds 5 Yr. Total (in $ thousands) 5307 Urbanized Formula $ 664,426 5337 State of Good $ 786,922 Repair 5339 Bus and Bus $ 62,887 Facilities Formula Sec. 5307 CMAQ $ 116,891 5309 Core Capacity $ 500,000 Sec. 5303 UWP Planning $ 2,427 Transit Security Grant $ 30,000 Program (DHS) RTA Bonds $ 144,000 Illinois Long Range $ 1,368 Transportation Plan CTA Bond $ 184,546 CTA Bond - Ground $ 163,000 Transportation Tax CTA Bond for Red and $ 227,249 Purple Modernization CTA Share for $ 949 Competitive Grants New Funding Available $ 2,884,665 DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 4 2019-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT USES The Capital Plan funds transformative projects, Your New Blue, Red Purple Modernization and Red Line Extension FY2019-2023 CIP (in $ thousands) Categories Budget Rail Line Improvements $ 899,315 Systemwide Misc. $ 871,771 Rail Rolling Stock $ 430,666 Bus Rolling Stock $ 275,954 Systemwide Facilities $ 179,257 Power & Way Track & Structure $ 194,966 Power & Way Electrical, Signal & $ 32,736 Communication CIP Total $ 2,884,665 DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 5 CTA BOND PROGRAM Red Purple Modernization - RPM Bond Contributing share of multiple funding sources allocated for the RPM Phase One project. Federal- 5309 City TIF - Bryn Core Capacity Mawr CTA Bonds CMAQ TIFIA Loan CTA Operating TOTAL 956,607,772 10,000,000 355,953,328 125,000,000 622,000,000 61,749,481 2,131,310,581 CTA Sales Tax Receipt Bonds Funding will provide for the purchase and overhaul of railcars, purchase of buses, renewal of traction power systems, modernization of rail signals, facilities upgrades, and other capital improvements. 2019 2020 2021 Total Bus Projects 0 35,604,546 0 35,604,546 Rail Projects 15,117,637 36,651,866 12,902,703 64,672,206 Infrastructure Projects 0 4,196,875 4,196,875 8,393,750 Facilities Projects 10,961,302 1,357,811 9,875,000 22,194,113 Rail Line Improvements 0 8,049,400 43,528,481 51,577,881 Project Administration 250,126 867,278 986,557 2,103,961 26,329,065 86,727,777 71,489,615 184,546,457 Actual timing of issuance will be determined by the project schedule and the flow of other sourced funds into the project. DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY NEW RIDE-HAILING FEE PROJECTS As of January 2018, the City of Chicago implemented an increase in Ground Transportation Tax (GTT) on ride-hailing services. The new revenues will be solely dedicated to transit projects The City and CTA entered into an agreement that will provide CTA with $16 million in annual funding to support a $179 million capital program that will be implemented over the next five years (2019-2023). The new fee will fund FastTracks and Safe and Secure Programs FastTracks Tracks Track and $44 M Green Line South Structure $30 M Green & Pink Line West 67.6% $25 M Red and Blue Subway $18 M Brown Line $4 M Blue Line Congress Branch Traction Traction Power Power $25 M Blue Line O’Hare Branch 14.0% Safe and Secure Security $8 M Maintain state of the art working camera system $5 M Replace/Modernize cameras system SecuritySecurity 10.1% $4 M Install camera system at CTA bus turnarounds 10.1% $1 M Install monitors at station kiosks Stations Stations 8.4% $15 M Replace/Upgrade lighting systems DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 7 ONGOING STATION PROJECTS 95th Street Terminal Improvement Project The new and expanded terminal will offer more space and better amenities, and improve the walking flow of passengers some features included are: Replacement and expansion of the terminal, platform and vehicle and pedestrian bridges Additional elevators, escalators, fare array, wider sidewalks and waiting areas New expanded bus bays will be provided around the 95th Terminal terminal South Terminal completed April 2018 North Terminal substantial completion Dec. 2018 Rehabilitate Stations Systemwide The FY19-23 CIP includes $25.6 million to upgrade and enhance rail stations system wide and for Safe and Secure Program. Upgrades to Wilson Station rapid-transit stations may include work such as: Rehabilitate Stationhouses (stairs, platforms and canopies ) Replace/modernize cameras system, install monitors at station kiosks Maintain state of the art working camera system Replace/upgrade lighting systems Install a camera system at CTA bus turnarounds DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 8 OTHER STATION PROJECTS – FY 2018/2019 Recently Completed: Wilson Red Line Transfer Station Construction Illinois Medical District Blue Line Station Renovation Active in 2019: Garfield Green Line Station Renovation Rehabilitation of historical and active stationhouses Quincy Loop Station Upgrades Makes Station Accessible - elevators with bridge to stationhouses Damen (Lake) Green Line Station New Construction (CDOT) New Station construction scheduled in 2019 and Open in 2020 DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM CTA's Scheduled Maintenance Program is designed to prevent and correct major mechanical, electrical, and structural problems on a plan basis. In the absence of funding for larger capital replacement projects, funds are used on rehabilitation, repair, and prevention work on capital assets to maintain safe and reliable service. Inspections and scheduled work is performed on the following major systems and components. BUS RAILCARS TRACK/STRUCTURE • Engine • Propulsion • Rails/Track • Transmission • Braking • Crossties/Fasteners • Body • Doors • Signal Lights • Differential • RCA • Switches • HVAQ • Communications • Ballasts • Brakes • Safety • Elevated Structure • Chassis/Suspension • Battery/Charging • Subway/Viaducts • Steering • Windows • Power Systems • Electrical • Lighting • Interlocking system • Fuel • Suspension • R.O.W. Structure • Air • HVAC • Station Infrastructure • Doors • Signage • Platform Infrastructure • Traction Power • Signage • Automatic Trail Control • Car body/Structure DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY ROLLING STOCK FY 2019-2023 Bus Plan Receive remaining 25 buses of current Nova contract Procurement of 20 Electric Buses - Contract Awarded Mid-Life Overhaul 100 Articulated buses Life Extending Overhaul on (430) Standard 40ft New Flyer buses Continue phased funding for first anticipated future order to replace the New Flyer 1000 Series Buses (55%) of CTA’s bus fleet FY 2019-2023 Rail Plan Continue allocating funds for the new rail car procurement 7000 Series Manufacturing plant for the new 7000-series rail cars completed 2018 10 Prototypes anticipated to be placed into service late 2019 Quarter-life overhaul of the 5000 Series rail cars (55%) of CTA’s rail fleet Q1 2019 Start Purchase of 4 Diesel locomotives Design 2019 Anticipate delivery 2020 DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 11 Project phases underway in FY19-23 Jefferson Park Station – Substantial Completion 2019 Grand, Chicago, Division Stations – Construction to begin Q1 2019 O’Hare Signal - Design Phase; Construction to begin Q2 2019 East Lake & Milwaukee Substation - Substantial Construction Completion 2020 DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 12 RED PURPLE MODERNIZATION (RPM) PROJECT PHASE ONE Phase One consists of Modernizing and expanding the Lawrence, Argyle, Berwyn and Bryn Mawr Red Line Stations Reconstructing and expanding tracks and structures Construct a bypass for the Brown Line at the Clark Junction to reduce capacity constraints Project Funding Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) Transit TIF funding CTA Bonds CMAQ Funding Key Project Milestones FY 2016 TIF Legislation authorizing funding for transit projects passed by IL House, IL Senate and Chicago City Council. FY 2017 CTA signed a Full Funding Grant Agreement with FTA; Securing the funding needed for the $2.1 billion first phase of RPM project. FY 2018 received $25 million of the previously awarded CMAQ grant $125M total. TIFIA Loan Letter of Interest to be submitted 2019 Project Status Acquired 98% land for future construction Successful construction bid Implementation FY17-18 Evaluation of RPM Design Build Teams 3 firms selected Design/Build contract Notice of Award – Dec. 2018 Board DRAFT – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 13 RED LINE EXTENSION Moving ahead in Federal Planning Process Red Line Extension would extend Red Line south by 5 miles to 130th Street, making Red Line span north-south length of city end to end Four new stations Transformational project provides improved, faster transit service to Far South Side
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early History of Junction City, Kansas : the First Generation
    AN EARLY HISTORY OF JUNCTION CITY, KANSAS! THE FIRST GENERATION JOHN B. JEFFRIES B. A., Oklahoma State University, 1950 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History, Political Science and Philosophy KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1963 i-V iu,i 7i j[,j TABLE OF CONTENTS C 2- Chapter Page Table of Contents ii Introduction _-----_----_-__-____ i I. Garden of Eden — — 7 II. The Founding of Junction City _ _ _ _ _ 20 III. Transportation — --- — . _ 39 IV. Communications ------------------- 77 Mail Service 77 Newspapers -------------------- 81 Telegraph __________ — — __ — _ 89 V. Government ---------------______ 90 County ---------------_______ 90 Census ---------------------- 97 U. S. Land Office 100 Politics 102 City 104 Streets and sidewalks -- _______ 107 Licensing of Saloons --------------- 108 Stray Livestock - _____ ___ _. 109 Law and Order _---------_------_ no Fire Protection 117 Finances ___ __ _ 121 City Additions _ 123 Home Guard and Militia --_ 123 U. S. Military Forces 125 ili VI. Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture - _-_ - 129 Commerce ---------------------- 130 Industry ------- — — ----- 142 Agriculture ____ — — 151 VII. Cultural and Social Growth 166 Religious Organizations --------------- 166 Episcopal Church 167 Union Church ------------------- 166 Methodist Church 169 Baptist Church 170 Presbyterian Church ---------------- 170 Catholic Church 172 Cemetery -------- — _________ — _ 172 Fraternal Organizations _-_-------_-_-- 173 Social Organizations — - — -- — -- — 176 Cultural Organizations -___ ig_ Education ---------------------- 182 Conclusion -----------------_____ 192 Bibliography - — 199 Appendix A, Firms advertising in 1860 - -- 211 Appendix B, Firms Advertising in 1870 213 Appendix C, Firms Advertising in 1880 215 INTRODUCTION The history of Junction City, Kansas, is more than merely that of an Army town, although the Junction City-Fort Riley connection has existed from the days of the first settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Drives Business Decisions
    Metroplanning.org/transitmeansbusiness Introduction: Transit Drives Business Decisions McDonald's. Caterpillar. Motorola Solutions. These Chicago region-based companies have many things in common: Table of Contents They employ thousands, help drive our region’s economy, Introduction: Transit Drives Business and cite transit as a key factor in their location and Decisions 3 recruitment strategy. Transit Has a Net Economic Benefit 5 Talent Prefers Transit 7 Businesses throughout the region rely on and benefit from metropolitan Chicago’s transit system. Transit Delivers Talent 10 However, the critical connection between transit investments and our ability to recruit and retain business in metropolitan Chicago is not broadly understood. With Transit Means Business, the Job Creation is Accelerated Near Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) is bringing together business leaders, transit leadership and state Transit 12 and local government to advocate for stronger investments in our region’s transit system. Transit Fosters Economic Resiliency 14 The reasons to mobilize now are clear. Businesses are betting on transit, but without sufficient Transit Delivers Value to Business 15 investment the competitive advantage our system provides is eroding and will start to fail. Our metropolitan-wide research shows: Case Studies 17 - Businesses are choosing to locate near transit to access larger labor pools; End Notes & Acknowledgements 47 - Locations near transit offer businesses increased resiliency; - Transit-accessible locations outperform the regional average on job growth, especially near rail. This report dives into the data to reveal how transit supports businesses, and profiles companies who are making transit-based decisions that benefit their bottom line. A growing and thriving transit system means a growing and thriving economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Maine State Rail Plan
    Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]
  • Villach Fill the Gap!
    VILLACH FILL THE GAP! EUROPAN15 competition brief by EUROPAN Austria VILLACH / Fill the Gap! Competition Brief Welcome! Dear participants, Welcome to the international competition Europan 15 “Productive Cities 2”! We like to thank you for choosing to participate in Europan Austria! Since 1989—thirty years now—Europan has acted as an international platform in Europe and is one of the world´s largest competitions, including follow-up implementation. It brings together European cities and young international professionals under the age of 40 in architectural, urban, and landscape design. This time Europan Austria presents five Austrian sites: Innsbruck, Graz, Weiz, Wien and Villach. We would like to thank all partners, actors, and organizations for having been open to travel with Europan to enter a sphere of productive uncertainty— the only starting point for honest and responsible innovation! We are looking forward to your projects. Good luck! Best regards, Europan Austria EUROPAN 15 - productive cities 2 15 - productive EUROPAN 2 VILLACH / Fill the Gap! Competition Brief EUROPAN AUSTRIA RULES c/o Haus der Architektur Please follow the European webpage Palais Thinnfeld, Mariahilferstrasse 2 http://europan-europe.eu 8020 Graz Austria QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Dependance Vienna: UPDATE OF MATERIAL Mariahilferstrasse 93/1/14 Please use and check the forum online 1060 Vienna http://europan-europe.eu Austria T +43. 1. 212 76 80 34 SITE VISIT F +43. 1. 212 76 80 99 Thursday 25.04.2019 / 13:00-16:00 [email protected] Meeting point: Park & Ride Westbahnhof, Steinwender Straße, 9500 https://www.europan.at Villach https://www.facebook.com/EuropanAustria Registration: http://europan-europe.eu Please confirm your participation via email to February 2017 [email protected] (name, number of participants, mobile number) Registration deadline: 24.04.2019 CALENDAR >Mo.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Historical Calendar Cta 2021 January
    cta 2021 Historical Calendar cta 2021 January Built in 1936 by the St. Louis Car Company, Chicago Surface Lines trolley bus #184 heads eastbound via Diversey to Western. Trolley bus service was first introduced in Chicago on the #76 Diversey route in 1930. Other trolley bus routes were soon added, some as extensions of existing streetcar lines and later as conversions of streetcar lines to trolley bus service. Trolley bus extensions to existing streetcar lines were an economical way to serve new neighborhoods that were established in outlying parts of the city. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ABCDEFG: December 2020 February 2021 B C CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group Days Off 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t Alternate day off if 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 you work on this day 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Central offices closed 27 28 29 30 31 28 1 New Year’s Day 2 C D E F G A B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B C D E F G A 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G Martin Luther King, 17 18 Jr. Day 19 20 21 22 23 G A B C D E F 24 F 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 cta 2021 February Car #1643 was an example of Chicago’s first electric streetcars.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
    INNER CIRCUMFERENTIAL COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT and STV Inc. April 1999 Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ............................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 2.1 Alignment Options .................................................. 5 2.2 Description of Alignments ............................................ 8 2.3 Land Use and Zoning ................................................ 12 2.4 Potential Station Locations ............................................ 12 2.5 Environmental Issues ................................................ 19 3.0 FUTURE PLANS .................................................. 24 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics .......................... 24 3.2 Municipal Development Plans. ........................................ 27 3.3 Railroads and Other Agencies .......................................... 34 4.0 POTENTIAL OPERATIONS ...................................... 39 4.1 Option 1: IHB-BRC ................................................. 40 4.2 Option 2 :MDW-BRC. .............................................. 41 4.3 Option 3: WCL-CSX-BRC ........................................... 42 4.4 Option 4: IHB-CCP-BRC ............................................ 43 5.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Service Patterns
    Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Organization of this Report .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 CTA Rail Forest Park Branch ................................................................................ 5 3.0 SERVICE PATTERNS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Car Requirements ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Train Requirements ................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Train Schedules ....................................................................................................... 6 4.0 POTENTIAL FUTURE SERVICE SCHEDULE .......................................................... 8 4.1 Average Daily Boarding Analysis ....................................................................... 8 4.2 Future Service Plan Options ................................................................................. 9 5.0 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Transit Administration Region V Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
    Federal Transit Administration Region V RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) A. Introduction This document provides the basis for a determination by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Red‐Purple Bypass Project. This determination is made in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 4332(2)(c); FTA’s implementing procedures (23 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] § 771.121); Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. § 303; and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. FTA, as the federal lead agency, and Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), as the local project sponsor, jointly prepared the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Section 4(f) Evaluation to describe potential impacts on the human and natural environment and historic integrity that may result from the Red‐Purple Bypass Project on the CTA Red and Purple lines. The EA was prepared pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.119 and issued by FTA on May 19, 2015. This FONSI is prepared by FTA pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.121., and incorporates by reference the EA and other cited documentation. B. Existing Conditions Figure 1 is a map of the project limits. The Red‐Purple Bypass Project area is approximately 5 miles north of downtown Chicago, in the Lakeview community area. The project area, just north of Belmont station, includes the existing junction where three CTA rail lines, the Red, Purple, and Brown lines, converge at an existing flat junction (known as Clark Junction), mainline Red and Purple line tracks extend north to Newport and Cornelia Avenues, and the Brown Line branch extends west to approximately Seminary Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • CTA: BUILDING a 21ST CENTURY TRANSIT SYSTEM PRESIDENT’S 2016 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CTA FY16 Budget Chicago Transit Board
    CTA: BUILDING A 21ST CENTURY TRANSIT SYSTEM PRESIDENT’S 2016 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CTA FY16 Budget Chicago Transit Board Terry Peterson, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Ashish Sen, Vice Chairman Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Arabel Alva Rosales Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Andre Youngblood Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Charles E. Robinson Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Kevin Irvine Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Dorval R. Carter Jr., President CTA FY16 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ............................................................................................................................................... 1 CTA Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 2015 Operating Budget Performance 2015 Operating Budget Performance Summary ..............................................................................................31 2015 Operating Budget Schedule.............................................................................................................................40 President’s 2016 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2016 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ............................................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Appendices
    1 Contents Acronyms Used in this Rail Plan ......................................................................................................... 4 Glossary of Common Terms............................................................................................................... 6 Freight Railroad Carrier Profiles ...................................................................................................... 11 BNSF Railway ..................................................................................................................... 11 Union Pacific Railroad .......................................................................................................... 12 Cimarron Valley Railroad ....................................................................................................... 13 Colorado & Wyoming Railway ................................................................................................. 14 Denver Rock Island Railroad ................................................................................................... 14 Great Western Railway of Colorado .......................................................................................... 15 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ................................................................................................ 16 Kyle Railroad Company ......................................................................................................... 17 Nebraska Kansas & Colorado Railway ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation
    RRREDEDED ---P-PPPURPLE BBBYPASS PPPROJECT EEENVIRONMENTAL AAASSESSMENT AND SSSECTION 4(4(4( FFF))) EEEVALUATION Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation Memorandum Date: May 14, 2015 Subject: Red-Purple Bypass Project Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Transit Data Supporting Documentation CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation Contents CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation ........................................................................................... 1 CTA. 2013a. Passenger Trips through Clark Junction .......................................................................... 1 CTA. 2013b. Existing Peak Ridership Demand ..................................................................................... 2 CTA. 2014a. ‘L’ Train Route & Individual Station Schedules/TimetablesSchedules/Timetables .............................................. 5 CTA. 2014b. Historic North Side Ridership Growth ............................................................................... 5 CTA. 2014c. Peak Period Trip Data ...................................................................................................... 8 CTA. 2014d. QuicTrak Circuit Data ..................................................................................................... 10 CTA. 2014e. December 2014 Ridership Report .................................................................................. 12 CTA. 2014g. TCRP Capacity Calculations for Clark Junction ............................................................. 12 CTA. 2014h. RedRed----PurplePurple
    [Show full text]
  • ASAP Strategic Plan - July 2018 I
    All Stations Accessibility Program (ASAP) Strategic Plan Final ASAP Strategic Plan - July 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................. IV ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER 1: STRATEGIC PLAN OVERVIEW ............................................................... 1 Program Goal and Development .......................................................................................... 1 Background and Context ........................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2: PRIORITIZATION PROCESS .................................................................. 13 Needs and Complexity .......................................................................................................... 13 Scoring Process ........................................................................................................................ 15 Scoring Results ......................................................................................................................... 19 Elevator Replacement Program Prioritization ..................................................................... 23 CHAPTER 3: DESIGN APPROACH .......................................................................... 26
    [Show full text]