DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Louisiana Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Louisiana Rail Plan Louisiana State Rail Plan Prepared for: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Prepared by: University of New Orleans Transportation Institute August 25, 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 LOUISIANA’S RAIL SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Freight Rail System ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Passenger Rail Service ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Rail Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 RAIL PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 LOUISIANA’S RAIL VISION AND SERVICE OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 2 Freight Rail Objectives ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Passenger Rail Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 PROPOSED CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAMS AND FUTURE STUDIES .................................................................................................. 3 STATE RAIL PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS ...................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1. .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 The State’s Goals for the Statewide Multimodal Transportation System ....................................................................... 6 1.2 Rail Transportation’s Role with the State’s Transportation System................................................................................. 6 1.3 Institutional Structure of Louisiana’s State Rail Program ..................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Office of Multimodal Commerce ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Railroad Safety Unit ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3.3 District Offices ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.4 Additional Public Sector Rail Planning in Louisiana ........................................................................................................... 8 1.3.5 Local Government Agencies with Rail Interests ................................................................................................................. 10 1.4 State Authority for Grant, Loan and Other Financing ............................................................................................................ 11 1.4.1 Louisiana Public Rail Funding Programs ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.4.1.1 LaDOTD Port Construction and Development Priority Program ......................................................................... 12 1.4.1.2 DED Rapid Response Program ............................................................................................................................................ 13 1.4.1.3 State Budget Appropriations ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.4.2 Louisiana Rail Program ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Summary of Freight and Passenger Rail Services .................................................................................................................... 13 1.5.1 Freight Services .................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.5.2 Passenger Services ............................................................................................................................................................................ 14 LOUISIANA’S EXISTING RAIL SYSTEM .................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Louisiana’s Existing Rail System ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Class I Railroads.................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 2.1.1.1 Local, Switching and Terminal Railroads ...................................................................................................................... 22 New Orleans Public Belt Railroad .......................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.1.2 Intercity Passenger Rail Network ...................................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.1.3 Proposed Services ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37 2.1.1.4 Abandonments and Rail-Banked Lines ........................................................................................................................... 37 2.1.2 Major Freight and Passenger Terminals ................................................................................................................................. 38 2.1.2.1 Freight Terminals ...................................................................................................................................................................... 38 2.1.2.2 Connectivity with Seaports and Airports ....................................................................................................................... 40 2.1.2.3 Major Passenger Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.1.3 Objectives for Passenger Service in Louisiana..................................................................................................................... 43 2.1.3.1 Enhance Existing Services ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 2.1.3.2 Freight Railroad Participation ............................................................................................................................................. 45 2.1.3.3 Continuing Outreach ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 2.1.3.4 Funding Strategies .................................................................................................................................................................... 46 2.1.3.5 Multimodal Integration and Transit Oriented Development ............................................................................... 46 2.1.3.6 Projected Ridership .................................................................................................................................................................. 47 2.1.4 Performance Evaluation of Louisiana Amtrak Services .................................................................................................. 48 2.1.4.1 Ridership ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 2.1.4.2 Financial Performance ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Jazz: Music, Place, and New Orleans by Sarah Ezekiel
    Navigating Jazz: Music, Place, and New Orleans by Sarah Ezekiel Suhadolnik A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Musicology) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Charles Hiroshi Garrett, Chair Professor David Ake, University of Miami Associate Professor Stephen Berrey Associate Professor Christi-Anne Castro Associate Professor Mark Clague © Sarah Ezekiel Suhadolnik 2016 DEDICATION To Jarvis P. Chuckles, an amalgamation of all those who made this project possible. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My dissertation was made possible by fellowship support conferred by the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School and the University of Michigan Institute for the Humanities, as well as ample teaching opportunities provided by the Musicology Department and the Residential College. I am also grateful to my department, Rackham, the Institute, and the UM Sweetland Writing Center for supporting my work through various travel, research, and writing grants. This additional support financed much of the archival research for this project, provided for several national and international conference presentations, and allowed me to participate in the 2015 Rackham/Sweetland Writing Center Summer Dissertation Writing Institute. I also remain indebted to all those who helped me reach this point, including my supervisors at the Hatcher Graduate Library, the Music Library, the Children’s Center, and the Music of the United States of America Critical Edition Series. I thank them for their patience, assistance, and support at a critical moment in my graduate career. This project could not have been completed without the assistance of Bruce Boyd Raeburn and his staff at Tulane University’s William Ransom Hogan Jazz Archive of New Orleans Jazz, and the staff of the Historic New Orleans Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainready Calumet Corridor, IL Plan
    RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MARCH 2017 ©2017 CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS Purpose of the RainReady Plan 1 A Citizen’s Guide to a RainReady Robbins i The Problem 2 The Path Ahead 3 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS How to Use This Plan 4 COMMUNITY SNAPSHOT 1 INTRODUCTION 5 ROBBINS, IL AT A GLANCE 2 The Vision 5 Flooding Risks and Resilience Opportunities 3 THE PROBLEM 6 RAINREADY ROBBINS COMMUNITY SURVEY 8 CAUSES AND IMPACTS OF URBAN FLOODING 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS IN ROBBINS, IL Your Homes and Neighborhoods 10 THE PATH FORWARD 23 Your Business Districts and Shopping Centers 12 What Can We Do? 23 Your Industrial Centers and How to Approach Financing Transportation Corridors 14 RainReady Communities 26 Your Open Space and Natural Areas 16 Community Assets 18 PARTNERS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 29 Steering Committees 30 COMMUNITY PRIORITIES 20 Technical Advisory Committee 33 Non-TAC Advisors 33 RAINREADY ACTION PLAN 22 THE PLANNING PROCESS 34 Purpose of the RainReady Plan 34 RAINREADY ROBBINS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Planning and Outreach Approach 36 Goal 1: Reorient 24 Goal 2: Repair 28 REGIONAL CONTEXT 42 Goal 3: Retrofit 31 RAINREADY: REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT SUMMARY 50 RAINREADY SOLUTIONS GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 55 A RainReady Future is Possible! 55 RAINREADY GOALS 56 The Three R’s: Reorient, Repair, Retrofit 56 THE THREE R’S 61 GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 62 Goal 1: Reorient 64 Goal 2: Repair 66 Goal 3: Retrofit 67 RAINREADY CALUMET CORRIDOR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of the RainReady Plan From more intense storms and chronic urban flooding to economic constraints and aging infrastructure, communities across the nation must find ways to thrive in the midst of shocks and stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday Through Friday Mt
    New printed schedules will not be issued if trips are adjusted Monday through Friday All trips accessible by five minutes or less. Please visit www.go-metro.com for the go smart... go METRO 24 most up-to-date schedule. 24 Mt. Lookout–Uptown–Anderson Riding Metro From Anderson / To Downtown From Downtown / To Anderson . 1 No food, beverages or smoking on Metro. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Offer front seats to older adults and people with disabilities. METRO* PLUS 3. All Metro buses are 100% accessible for people 38X with disabilities. 46 UNIVERSITY OF 4. Use headphones with all audio equipment 51 CINCINNATI GOODMAN DANA MEDICAL CENTER HIGHLAND including cell phones. Anderson Center Station P&R Salem Rd. & Beacon St. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Liberty St. & Sycamore St. Square Government Area B Square Government Area B Liberty St. & Sycamore St. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly Salem Rd. & Beacon St. Anderson Center Station P&R 11 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 43 5. Fold strollers and carts. BURNET MT. LOOKOUT AM AM 38X 4:38 4:49 4:57 5:05 5:11 5:20 5:29 5:35 5:40 — — — — 4:10 4:15 4:23 — 4:35 OBSERVATORY READING O’BRYONVILLE LINWOOD 6.
    [Show full text]
  • March 25, 2019 Volume 39
    MARCH 25, 2019 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 39 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 3 13 The Semaphore 17 David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South 24 Boston Globe & Wall Street Journal Reporters Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Western Massachusetts………………………. Ron Clough Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart Mid-Atlantic News……………………………. Doug Buchanan PRODUCTION STAFF Publication…………….………………… …. … Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………. Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2019 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 39 ■■■■■ NUMBER 3 ■■■■■ MARCH 2019 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Treasurer………………....Will Baker Book Review ........ ………12 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Chief’s Corner ...... ……. .3 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Contests ................ ……….3 Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’20) ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘20) Clinic……………..………3 ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’19) Editor’s Notes. ….….....….12 …………………………...Gary Mangelinkx (‘19) Members ............... …….....12 Memories .............. ………..4 th Potpourri ............... ..…..…..5 ON THE COVER: March 9-10 Show Running Extra....... .….……13 and Open House memories. (Photos by Joe Dumas) 2 FORM 19 ORDERS Fred Lockhart MARCH B.O.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Posted on May 5, 2021 Sites with Asterisks (**) Are Able to Vaccinate 16-17 Year Olds
    Posted on May 5, 2021 Sites with asterisks (**) are able to vaccinate 16-17 year olds. Updated at 4:00 PM All sites are able to vaccinate adults 18 and older. Visit www.vaccinefinder.org for a map of vaccine sites near you. Parish Facility Street Address City Website Phone Acadia ** Acadia St. Landry Hospital 810 S Broadway Street Church Point (337) 684-4262 Acadia Church Point Community Pharmacy 731 S Main Street Church Point http://www.communitypharmacyrx.com/ (337) 684-1911 Acadia Thrifty Way Pharmacy of Church Point 209 S Main Street Church Point (337) 684-5401 Acadia ** Dennis G. Walker Family Clinic 421 North Avenue F Crowley http://www.dgwfamilyclinic.com (337) 514-5065 Acadia ** Walgreens #10399 806 Odd Fellows Road Crowley https://www.walgreens.com/covid19vac Acadia ** Walmart Pharmacy #310 - Crowley 729 Odd Fellows Road Crowley https://www.walmart.com/covidvaccine Acadia Biers Pharmacy 410 N Parkerson Avenue Crowley (337) 783-3023 Acadia Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy - Crowley 1002 N Parkerson Avenue Crowley (337) 783-7200 Acadia Crowley Primary Care 1325 Wright Avenue Crowley (337) 783-4043 Acadia Gremillion's Drugstore 401 N Parkerson Crowley https://www.gremillionsdrugstore.com/ (337) 783-5755 Acadia SWLA CHS - Crowley 526 Crowley Rayne Highway Crowley https://www.swlahealth.org/crowley-la (337) 783-5519 Acadia Miller's Family Pharmacy 119 S 5th Street, Suite B Iota (337) 779-2214 Acadia ** Walgreens #09862 1204 The Boulevard Rayne https://www.walgreens.com/covid19vac Acadia Rayne Medicine Shoppe 913 The Boulevard Rayne https://rayne.medicineshoppe.com/contact
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service
    Transportation Research Record 1036 79 The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service UPALI VANDEBONA and ANTHONY J. RICHARDSON ABSTRACT It is known that different fare-collection strategies have different passenger boarding and alighting rates for street-based public transport services. In this pape r, various models of stop service times are reviewed, the available empirical observations of boarding and alighting rates are summarized, and the effects of different average boarding rates and coefficients of variation of boarding rates on the route performance of a tram (light rail transit) service are examined. The analysis is conducted using the TRAMS (Transit Route Anima­ tion and Modeling by Simulation) package. This modeling package is briefly described with particular attention to the passenger demand subroutine as well as the tram stop service times subroutine. As a result o f the analysis , it was found that slower boarding rates produce a slower and less reliable service along the route. The variability of boarding rates has no effect on route travel time but does contribute to greater unreliability in level of service. It is concluded that these level-of-service effects need to be considered when assessing the effect of changes in fare-collection strategies. Public transport operators and managers have found systems to proof-of-payment systems will generally themselves under increasing pressure in recent years bring about significant level-of-service improve­ because of conflicting expectations from different ments that should be considered in any analysis of groups in the community. On the one hand, public such fare collection strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverfront Expressway Cancellation, Shuddering at the New Orleans That Could Have Been
    Geographies of New Orleans Fifty Years After Riverfront Expressway Cancellation, Shuddering at the New Orleans That Could Have Been Richard Campanella Geographer, Tulane School of Architecture [email protected] Published in the New Orleans Picayune-Advocate, August 12, 2019, page 1. Fifty years ago this summer, reports from Washington D.C. reached New Orleans that John Volpe, secretary of the Department of Transportation under President Richard Nixon, had cancelled the Riverfront Expressway—the high-speed, elevated interstate slated for the French Quarter. The stunning news, about a wildly controversy plan that had divided the community for years, was met with elation by the city’s growing preservationist movement, and head-shaking disappointment by local leaders in both the public and private sectors. A half-century on, the cancellation and the original proposal invite speculation —part mental exercise, part cautionary tale—about what greater New Orleans might look like today had the Riverfront Expressway gone forward. And it very nearly did: conventional wisdom at the time saw the new infrastructure as an inevitable step toward progress, following the lead of many other waterfront cities, including New York, San Francisco, and Seattle. But first, a recap on how the New Orleans plan got to Volpe’s desk. Rendering from Robert Moses' Arterial Plan for New Orleans, 1946, page 11, courtesy collection of R. Campanella The initial concept for the Riverfront Expressway emerged from a post-World War II effort among state and city leaders to modernize New Orleans’ antiquated regional transportation system. Toward that end, the state Department of Highways hired the famous—many would say infamous—New York master planner Robert Moses, who along with Andrews & Clark Consulting Engineers, released in 1946 his Arterial Plan for New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Street with Railroad Alternative Section 1 Greenway Plan Master Greenway | Rochbeoablrdwavea Tlko Cdooveredrgeno Canais L St
    GREENWAY | GALVEZ TO JOHNSON GREENWAY | GALVEZ TO JOHNSON GREENWAY | GALVEZ TO JOHNSON 80’ 140’ Orchard80’ Communtiy140’ Orchard CommuntiyGarden 140’ 80’ Garden Orchard Communtiy BOARDWALK COVERED CANAL Garden GREENWAY | ROCHEBLAVE TO DORGENOIS ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 1 MASTER PLANGREENWAY GREENWAY | ROCHBEOABLRDWAVEA TLKO CDOOVEREDRGENO CANAIS L ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 1 GREENWAY | ROCHEBLAVE TO DORGENOIS ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 1 The sections show three options for the Orleans Relief Canal that include covering the Canal with a boardwalk, grass and bridge. The second set of options explore the relationship of the railroad, Greenway trail and existing roadway between N. Alexander Street and City Park Avenue. The sections are referenced on the Lafitte ROW Greenway Master Plan Alternative 1 on page ROW 38. BOARDWALK COVERED CANAL Greenway trail as a sharrow along St. Louis ROW ST. LOUIS STREET5 Street- WIT Option 1H RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 2 GR4 BoardwalkASSED covered T canalOPPED - Option 1 CANAL ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 2 ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 2 GREENWAY | LOPEZ AND RENDON GREENWAY | LOPEGRZ ANASSEDD RE TNODPPEDON CANAL GREENWAY | LOPEZ AND RENDON ROW Greenway trail as aROW separated pedestrian path and 5 bicycle sharrow - Option 2 ST. LOUIS STREET WITH ROWRAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 3 4 Grass topped canal - Option 2 ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 3 ST. LOUIS STREET WITH RAILROAD ALTERNATIVE SECTION 3 GRASSED TOPPED CANAL BRIDGE CROSSINGS OVER THE CANAL BRIDGE CROSSINGS OVER THE CANAL 6” 6” ROW 6” ROW ROW Greenway trail separated by a fence adjacent to the 5 railroad - Option 3 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISI4 ANABridge crossings over the canal - Option 3 PROPOSED GREENWAY SECTIONS 0 5 10 20 PROPOSED GREENWAY SECTIONS 0 5 10 20 AUGUSTNEW ORLE 2011 ANS, LOUISIANA Mitchell J.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Rail B
    FREIGHT RAIL B Pennsylvania has 57 freight railroads covering 5127 miles across the state, ranking it 4th largest rail network by mileage in the U.S. By 2035, 246 million tons of freight is expected to pass through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, an increase of 22 percent over 2007 levels. Pennsylvania’s railroad freight demand continues to exceed current infrastructure. Railroad traffic is steadily returning to near- World War II levels, before highways were built to facilitate widespread movement of goods by truck. Rail projects that could be undertaken to address the Commonwealth’s infrastructure needs total more than $280 million. Annual state-of-good-repair track and bridge expenditures for all railroad classes within the Commonwealth are projected to be approximately $560 million. Class I railroads which are the largest railroad companies are poised to cover their own financial needs, while smaller railroads are not affluent enough and some need assistance to continue service to rural areas of the state. BACKGROUND A number of benefits result from using rail freight to move goods throughout the U.S. particularly on longer routes: congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, enhancement of transportation safety, reduction of truck traffic on highways, and economic development. Railroads also remain the safest and most cost efficient mode for transporting hazardous materials, coal, industrial raw materials, and large quantities of goods. Since the mid-1800s, rail transportation has been the centerpiece of industrial production and energy movement. Specifically, in light of the events of September 11, 2001 and from a national security point of view, railroads are one of the best ways to produce a more secure system for transportation of dangerous or hazardous products.
    [Show full text]