DOCSLIB.ORG

Smart Mobility Hubs (SMH) Concept of Operations for the Smart Columbus Demonstration Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smart Mobility Hubs (SMH) Concept of Operations for the Smart Columbus Demonstration Program Smart Mobility Hubs (SMH) Concept of Operations for the Smart Columbus Demonstration Program FINAL REPORT | July 30, 2018 Produced by City of Columbus Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government is not endorsing any manufacturers, products, or services cited herein and any trade name that may appear in the work has been included only because it is essential to the contents of the work. Acknowledgement of Support This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Transportation under Agreement No. DTFH6116H00013. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Project Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2. Geographic Scope ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Project Relationship to System of Systems.......................................................................... 4 1.4. Smart Mobility Hubs System Overview ................................................................................. 5 1.4.1. Smart Mobility Hubs Facility ............................................................................................ 6 1.5. Smart Columbus Projects Associated with HUBS .............................................................. 8 1.5.1. Operating System ............................................................................................................ 8 1.5.2. Multimodal Trip Planning Application/Common Payment System .................................. 8 1.6. HUBS Stakeholders ................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.1. The City of Columbus ...................................................................................................... 9 1.6.2. Central Ohio Transit Authority ......................................................................................... 9 1.6.3. Columbus Emergency Dispatch Center .......................................................................... 9 1.6.4. Metro Library – Linden Branch ........................................................................................ 9 1.6.5. St. Stephen’s Community House ..................................................................................... 9 1.6.6. Columbus State Community College ............................................................................. 10 1.6.7. Developer ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.6.8. Mobility Providers .......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2. References ................................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Stakeholder Engagement Summary Interviews ................................................................. 12 Chapter 3. Current System ......................................................................................................... 15 3.1. Background and Objectives .................................................................................................. 15 3.1.1. Central Ohio Transit Authority CMAX ............................................................................ 16 3.1.2. Central Ohio Transit Authority Transit Centers and Park-and-Ride Facilities ............... 17 3.1.3. Central Ohio Transit Authority Passenger Wi-Fi ............................................................ 19 3.1.4. City of Columbus Emergency Dispatch Center ............................................................. 19 3.2. Operational Policies and Constraints .................................................................................. 20 3.3. Modes of Operation ................................................................................................................. 20 3.4. Users Classes of the Current System .................................................................................. 21 Smart Mobility Hubs Concept of Operations – Final Report | Smart Columbus Program | i Table of Contents Chapter 4. Justification and Nature of Changes ........................................................................ 23 4.1. Justification for Changes ....................................................................................................... 23 4.2. Description of Desired Changes ........................................................................................... 26 4.3. Priorities Among Changes ..................................................................................................... 30 4.4. Changes Considered but Not Included................................................................................ 31 Chapter 5. Concept for the New System.................................................................................... 33 5.1. Background, Objectives and Scope ..................................................................................... 33 5.1.1. Operational Policies and Constraints ............................................................................ 33 5.1.2. Description of Proposed System ................................................................................... 34 5.1.3. Methodology for Site Selection ...................................................................................... 35 5.1.4. Proposed Smart Mobility Hub Locations ....................................................................... 37 5.1.5. Proposed Smart Mobility Hub Facilities ......................................................................... 38 5.2. Modes of Operation ................................................................................................................. 40 5.3. User Classes and Other Involved Personnel ...................................................................... 41 5.4. Support Environment ............................................................................................................. 42 5.5. Security and Privacy ............................................................................................................... 42 Chapter 6. Operational Scenarios .............................................................................................. 43 Chapter 7. Summary of Impacts ................................................................................................. 55 7.1. Operational Impacts ................................................................................................................ 55 7.2. Organizational Impacts ........................................................................................................... 55 7.3. Impacts During Development ................................................................................................ 56 Chapter 8. Analysis of Multimodal Trip Planning App ................................................................ 57 8.1. Summary of Improvements ................................................................................................... 57 8.2. Disadvantages and Limitations ............................................................................................. 57 8.3. Alternatives and Trade-Offs Considered ............................................................................. 57 Chapter 9. Notes .......................................................................................................................... 59 Appendix A. Stakeholder Engagement Summary ............................................................... 61 Appendix B. Acronyms and Definitions ................................................................................. 67 Appendix C. Glossary............................................................................................................. 69 ii | Smart Columbus Program | Smart Mobility Hubs Concept of Operations – Final Report Table of Contents List of Tables Table 1: References .................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 2: Meetings ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Table 3: Existing Central Ohio Transit Authority Facilities Features ........................................................... 18 Table 4: Operational Policies and Constraints of the Current System ........................................................ 20 Table 5: Modes of Operation for Current System ....................................................................................... 20 Table 6: User Classes of the Current System ............................................................................................. 21 Table 7: Beneficial Locations for Smart Mobility Hubs Deployment ..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Self-Service Kiosks
    U.S. Self-Service Kiosks: January 2021 BCC Publishing Staff Report Code: IFT218A Additional segmentations and data sets available upon request. Email [email protected]. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 Study Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................................... 1 Scope of Report ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Reasons for Doing the Study ......................................................................................................................... 2 Intended Audiences ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Information Sources ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Analyst’s Credentials ..................................................................................................................................... 7 BCC Custom Research ................................................................................................................................... 7 Related
    [Show full text]
  • Redyref Kiosks Hardware
    phone web email 1-800-628-3603 www.RedyRef.com [email protected] REDYREF KIOSKS HARDWARE MATRIX SURFACE ENGAGE T-SERIES ENGAGE L-SERIES ENGAGE H-SERIES & RECESSED ENGAGE C-SERIES RAZOR EMPIRE 2.0 REDYTOUCH PRODIGY PRODIGY-C T-FLEX T-FLEX-C PRESTO SKYLINE BAZOOKA 2.0 MEDIA TOWER ADA COMPLIANT ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED THE REDYREF CLIENT PORTFOLIO PROUDLY INCLUDES: REDYREF KIOSKS MATRIX SURFACE & RECESSED The REDYREF Matrix wall-mounted kiosk is one of our most in-demand designs, suitable for digital signage, electronic directory and interactive wayfinding applications. Its clean, elegant design was engineered to enclose displays in landscape or portrait orientations in a modern stainless steel finish (custom powder coat finishes are also available). The Matrix is available in Surface or Recessed models with both touch- and non- touch displays from which to choose, while the generous standard display size lends itself to easy end-user interaction, including the use of typeable, on-screen keyboards. Although it is a popular choice for commercial office spaces, it is at home in many other indoor environments, from hospital and college campuses to convention centers and hotel lobbies. Durable, flexible and customizable with a wide-variety of available integrations, the Matrix is an ideal digital kiosk solution for a wide variety of deployments. Standard size: 22”, 32”, 42”, 55” ENGAGE T-SERIES When space is at a premium but can’t come at the cost of functionality, the enGAGE T-series freestanding digital kiosk is an ideal choice. With its minimal footprint, the T was designed to offer the power and performance of a standard- sized kiosk but in a compact form factor by utilizing a touchscreen tablet computer, rather than a typical display.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Research on Kiosk Project Around the United States
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons CUTR Research Reports CUTR Publications 10-1-1996 Background Research on Kiosk Project around the United States Mark Burris University of South Florida Michael Pietrzyk University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cutr_reports Scholar Commons Citation Burris, Mark and Pietrzyk, Michael, "Background Research on Kiosk Project around the United States" (1996). CUTR Research Reports. 27. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cutr_reports/27 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the CUTR Publications at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CUTR Research Reports by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Center for Urban Transportation Research Background Research on Kiosk Projects around the United States University of South Florida College of Engineering Technical Memorandum # 1 in partial fulfillment of the 1997 Metro-Dade MPO Unified Planning Work Program Interactive Traveler Information Stations CUTRAccount No. 21-17-233-L.O. Background Research on Kiosk Projects around the United States Prepared by Mark Burris & Mike Pietrzyk Center for Urban Transportation Research College of Engineering - University of South Florida for the Metro-Dade MPO October 1996 1.0 SCOPE The scope of this study is to research interactive kiosk projects in the U.S. and Canada and make recommendations to the Metro-Dade MPO on the selection, user specifications, and installation locations of interactive kiosks in the Miami area. The kiosks have several purposes, including disseminating traffic/transportation information to the public and tourist alike, supplying timely tourist information to users, and providing feedback to transportation planners on proposed transportation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Project 2 - Interactive Kiosk INDS 3230 (Spring 2018)
    Project 2 - Interactive Kiosk INDS 3230 (Spring 2018) Background Interactive kiosks are commonly used in many places nowadays. You can spot them at airports, galleries, shopping malls, libraries and even in restaurants where they are used as menus. They are freestanding computer terminals that have been designed for public consumption. They usually provide up to date public information, food items as well as tickets. An example of the most common kiosk is the automated teller machine (ATM). It provides a self- service option for people that would like to get their money fast or perform other types of transactions. Besides the ATM, there are other types of kiosks that range from street side booths used for selling newspapers and cigarettes to high tech kiosks such as multimedia internet kiosks. The interactive kiosks usually consist of a CPU, printer, a touch screen or keyboard and stereo speakers. There are also custom-made kiosks that are tailor made to suit the needs of people who are looking for unique and innovative ways to promote their services. Aesthetic and functional design are among key elements in an interactive kiosk. Designing it usually needs relatively larger buttons as well as navigational hierarchy compared to web design. Besides the aesthetic appeal, a good kiosk is also supposed to be ergonomic in its placement of hardware. It needs a user interface with an intuitive flow and attractive graphics that can be easily read onscreen. An interactive kiosk should also be comfortable and easy to use. For example, if an ATM has clear and easy to use instructions, it will be absolutely easy for anyone to navigate it without extra help and effort, which saves a lot of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Communities Glossary Version 1
    U.S. Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Informattion Administration Smart Communities Glossary Version 1 November 2017 Prepared by: National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Office of Telecommunicat ions and Information Applications (OTIA) 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 Numerals 4G: The fourth-generation cellular wireless telecommunications standard with maximum download and upload speeds of at least 100 Mbps.1 5G: The next generation of wireless connectivity, which will allow new high-speed, low latency wi reless broadband services.2 B Backhaul: The portion of a broadband network in which the local access or end user point is linked to the main Internet network.3 Big Data: Consists of extensive datasets—primarily in the characteristics of volume, variety, velocity and/or variability—that require a scalable architecture for efficient storage, manipulation a nd analysis.4 Broadband: High-speed Internet access that is always on and fasteer than traditional dial-up access. Broadband includes several high-speed transmission technologies, such as fiber, wireless, satellite, digital subscriber line and cable. For the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), broadband capability requires consumers to have access to actual download speeds of at least 25 Mbps and actual upload speeds of at least 3 Mbps.5 C Civic Technology: The use of digital tools and technology to deepen the relationss hip between citizens and the ir government.6 Cloud Computing: A model for allowin g convenient,
    [Show full text]
  • 16/17 Welcome to Friendlyway
    16/17 Welcome to friendlyway 1998-2016 Dear valued customers and readers, 1998 was an incredibly successful year. The economy was booming, and there was an exciting, electrifying atmosphere of pioneering and innovation. The “Smart” car manufacturer was producing the first Smart cars; the European Central Bank was founded; the construction contract for the ISS international space station was signed. Microsoft, Unterschleißheim In our elated mindset, we would have thought it entirely feasible for our company to turn into one of the wor- ld’s leading providers of digital self-service and electronic adscreens over the coming decade. However, even „This professional friendlyway security solution we were surprised to find out that our average annual growth has been above 60% – three times the growth of the market we work in. Today, a grand total of 50,000 friendlyway solutions are being deployed in over 49 countries. Looking back over the past decade, we are especially pleased with our never-ending whirlwind of allows us to get feedback during the event on ideas and inventions. Many of the major innovations in our field can be traced back directly to the pioneering work of friendlyway AG. In fact, some of our products have turned into blueprints for our competitors on an Tablet PC [...].„ international scale. Despite our past achievements, however, we are confident that the success story of friendlyway AG is only just beginning. There has been a veritable explosion in demand for self-service solutions and digital ad- screens in public areas. New usage scenarios are emerging that no one could have anticipated.
    [Show full text]
  • Information and Communication Technologies for Public Use and Interactive-Multimedia City Kiosks MASTER of INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
    Information and Communication Technologies for Public Use and Interactive-Multimedia City Kiosks By Özlem TAŞKIN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN Department: Industrial Design Major: Industrial Design İzmir Institute of Technology İzmir, Turkey April, 2004 We approve the thesis of Özlem TAŞKIN Date of Signature .................................................. 14.04.2004 Assist. Prof. Dr. A. Can ÖZCAN Supervisor Department of Industrial Design .................................................. 14.04.2004 Assist. Prof. Yavuz SEÇKİN Department of Industrial Design .................................................. 14.04.2004 Assoc. Prof. Dr. Deniz ŞENGEL Department of Architecture .................................................. 14.04.2004 Assist. Prof. Yavuz SEÇKİN Head of Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Assist. Prof. Dr. A. Can Özcan for his continual advice, supervision and understanding in the research and writing of this thesis. I would like to thank Assist. Prof. Yavuz Seçkin for his advice and support throughout my master’s studies. I would also like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Deniz Şengel for her continuous help in detail from the linguistic point of view. I am grateful to my friend Bilgen Boyacıoğlu for her typing, support, and invaluable friendship, and to my friend Can Kara for his support and unceasing interest. I also would like to thank my family for their patience, encouragement, care, and endless support during my whole education. ABSTRACT This thesis provides framework for consideration of the potential of information and communication technologies for public events and performances for the developing usage of new products, particularly information public kiosks. In the theoretical framework, the concepts and terms of information and communication technology are generally introduced along with the identification of number of major factors such as elements, diversity, necessity and evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Studies of Self Service Technology for the Development of Interactive Kiosk Services Jeflet M Bejoy ,Dr
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 6, June-2020 706 ISSN 2229-5518 Recent Advances In Studies Of Self Service Technology For The Development Of Interactive Kiosk Services Jeflet M Bejoy ,Dr. Anantha Christu Raj. P ,Dr. Rajalakshmy. P Abstract— The purpose of the paper is to analyze and explore the scope of Self-Service Technology (SST) to develop standalone kiosks which can aid humans in their day to day activities. SST has already replaced humans in various commercial and medical fields as product dispenser, ticket vending machine, information desks, remote disease diagnosis, manufacturing kiosks, navigation tool and so on. Factors determining the adaptability, acceptance, degree of usefulness and usability are analyzed using various techniques. Effectiveness of multiple-user kiosk is examined against single-user kiosk for commercial purposes. The data collected through various studies and experiments are analyzed to generate as well as refine the existing algorithms to provide precise and accurate feedback. The paper can provide a quick peek into various phases in the field of kiosk development during the last few years and its effect on various realms. The study assist technology aspirants to bridge the technological gap and develop highly efficient interactive self-service kiosk models. Index Terms— Self-Service Kiosk, Kiosk, Self-Service Technology, SST, Human-Computer Interaction, SSK —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION ecent year have seen a tremendous rise in the usage of The major problem faced in hospitals is the rush in the interactive technology to solve human problems and emergency department and problems that it could lead to R make life effortless and less complicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Kiosk INDS 3230
    PROJECT 1 - Interactive Kiosk INDS 3230 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Background Interactive kiosks are commonly used in many places nowadays. You can spot them at airports, galleries, shopping malls, libraries and even in restaurants where they are used as menus. They are freestanding computer terminals that have been designed for public consumption. They usually provide up to date public information, food items as well as tickets. An example of the most common kiosk is the automated teller machine (ATM). It provides a self-service option for people that would like to get their money fast or perform other types of transactions. Besides the ATM, there are other types of kiosks that range from street side booths used for selling newspapers and cigarettes to high tech kiosks such as multimedia internet kiosks. The interactive kiosks usually consist of a CPU, printer, a touch screen or keyboard and stereo speakers. There are also custom-made kiosks that are tailor made to suit the needs of people who are looking for unique and innovative ways to promote their services. Aesthetic and functional design are among key elements in an interactive kiosk. Designing it usually needs relatively larger buttons as well as navigational hierarchy compared to web design. Besides the aesthetic appeal, a good kiosk is also supposed to be ergonomic in its placement of hardware. It needs a user interface with an intuitive flow and attractive graphics that can be easily read onscreen. An interactive kiosk should also be comfortable and easy to use. For example, if an ATM has clear and easy to use instructions, it will be absolutely easy for anyone to navigate it without extra help and effort, which saves a lot of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifunctional Interactive Furniture for Smart Cities †
    proceedings Proceedings Multifunctional Interactive Furniture for Smart Cities † Oihane Gómez-Carmona *,‡, Diego Casado-Mansilla ‡ and Diego López-de-Ipiña ‡ DeustoTech—University of Deusto, Avda. Universidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] (D.C.-M.); [email protected] (D.L.-d.-I.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Presented at the 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI 2018), Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 4–7 December 2018. ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. Published: 1 November 2018 Abstract: The adaptation of cities to a future in which connectivity is at the service of the citizens will be a reality by creating interaction spaces and augmented urban areas. The research on this field falls within the scope of Smart Cities (SC) with the advantages that the common public spaces provide as new points for information exchange between the city, the urban furniture and their citizens. Kiosk systems have been recognized as an appropriate mean for providing event-aware and localized information to the right audience at the right time. Hence, in this article, we provide a vision of an eco-system of multifunctional urban furniture, where kiosks are part of them, designed not only for digital interaction but for sustainable use and symbolic integration into the urban environment as well. The proposed approach is conceived to drive services through digital urban nodes that facilitate tailored citizen-city communication and interaction. The central element of the designed platform consists on an intelligent digital kiosk which features a series of hardware and software components for sensing different environmental conditions, multimodal interaction with users and for conveying the captured data to the Cloud.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Beverage Segment Grew by 8.4 Percent Between 2013 and 2016
    The food and beverage segment grew by 8.4 percent between 2013 and 2016. It is expected to grow by 30% 7.2 percent over the next three years, $717 REACHING $310 MILLION IN MARKET VALUE BY 2021. Percentage INCREASE in MILLION customers’ food and beverage orders when they use self-service kiosks MARKET CAP of the U.S. interactive kiosk market in 2016 Food & Beverage EDITION Kiosks for food and beverage represent MORE THAN 30 PERCENT of the U.S. market, making it the largest kiosk category. Revenue from “intelligent vending machines” is expected to reach NEARLY $12 BILLION by 2025. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Kiosk & Retail Report was done in collaboration with USA Technologies, and PYMNTS is grateful for the company’s support and insights. PYMNTS.com retains full editorial control over the findings presented as well as the methodology and data analysis. 3 table of contents INTRODUCTION QSRs AND KIOSKS 10 Customer Behavior 04 10 11 Labor Costs 07 THE DATA BEHIND THE INDUSTRY 12 CONCLUSION 09 THE EVOLUTION OF THE VENDING MACHINE 14 ABOUT © 2018 PYMNTS.com All Rights Reserved WHAT’S INSIDE 4 INTRODUCTION © 2018 PYMNTS.com All Rights Reserved Introduction 5 SUMMARY STATISTIC • The United States interactive kiosk market was worth • Shipments of food and beverage kiosks to the U.S. $717 million in 2016.1 grew by 11 percent between 2013 and 2016, when more than 2 million units were shipped.4 • Kiosks for food and beverage represent more than 30 • One study has found fast food customers spend 30 percent of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper: How to Choose the Best Wayfinding Option
    How to Choose the Best Wayfinding Option DIGITAL SIGNAGE WHITE PAPER www.visix.com | 800.572.4935 How to Choose the Best Wayfinding Option Table of Contents What is Wayfinding? . 3 Which Option is Right for You? . 3 Traditional Digital Signage . 3 Interactive Kiosk . 4 Responsive Mobile Site . 5 Wayfinding App . 6 User Experience Pros & Cons . 7 Technical Pros & Cons . 8 How to Choose? . 8 We’re here to help! If you have any questions about your application or our products, please contact us at 800.572.4935 or [email protected]. Copyright © 2015 Visix, Inc. All rights reserved. Visix, the Visix logo and Announce are registered trademarks of Visix, Inc. APPOINT™, MeetingMinder™, RoomBoard™, WayPoint™ and xtras™ are common law trademarks of Visix, Inc. All other trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners. Visix reserves the right to alter specifications without notice at any time. D-MAR-0000-147 11/15 www.visix.com | 800.572.4935 Page 2 How to Choose the Best Wayfinding Option What is Wayfinding? Put simply, wayfinding is an information system that guides people through a physical area. It’s particularly important in complex buildings or on campuses that have multiple structures for people to navigate. In large, spread-out or more complicated environments, people need more directions and visual cues to help them get to their destinations. Helping your visitors get from point A to point B quickly and easily relieves their stress, gives them a feeling of security and safety, and optimizes the overall visitor experience. Wayfinding can be a simple as verbal directions using landmarks – the Eiffel tower, a fountain in your lobby or a hospital parking garage – or traditional signs and directories that use labels and arrows to point people in the right direction.
    [Show full text]