“Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 “Sustainable and Multimodal Transport Actions in the Scandinavian-Adriatic CorridorWork Package ” 3.1 Assessing multimodal capacities and flows along the Scandria-Corridor Activity 3.1.3 Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs DraftResponsible Partner Report Region Skåne Freight hubs Author Helena Kyster-Hansen, MOE | Tetraplan Part of the Scandria®2Act Project Version 3 Date 18.09.2017 Status Final report Work Package 3.1 Version 3, 20162, 2017-09-18 » 1 | 94 Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 Document Approval Chronology Document Revision / Approval Version Date Status Date Status 1 13.04.2017 Draft report 24.03.2017 Ok 2 22.08.2017 Draft report 3 18.09.2017 Final report Output Description (Application Form) Output Schedule Source Deadline / Milestone 31.10.1 30.04.1 31.10.1 30.04.1 31.10.1 30.04.1 6 7 7 8 8 9 Planned according to work plan Expected Quality Criteria (for main outputs only) Questions to be answered: What is the main contents (e.g. type of information) of the output and volume (e.g. # of pages, entries); What is the format of the main output (e.g. an excel tool, an online data base, a physical in- vestment, a report publishable online and in print); If applicable, what functions/functionality of e.g. an IT solution: such as data exchange among different data bases, data export, data storage, etc. are foreseen. Version 3, 20162, 2017-09-18 » 2 | 94 Additional Quality Criteria (for all outputs) Questions to be answered: What is the aim of the output? Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 Output Description In this activity an investigation regarding the potential development for the major intermodal hubs in the Scania region is carried out. The activity provides an overview of knowledge concerning multimodal transport in the Scandria Corridor focusing on the Scania region. A special focus is on future volumes in the major hubs. Output Schedule Source Deadline / Milestone 31.10.16 30.04.17 31.10.17 30.04.18 31.10.18 30.04.19 Planned according to Draft re- Final re- work plan port port Expected Quality Criteria (for main outputs only) The main contents are information regarding development possibilities such as trade and traffic forecasts, capacity constraints and connections. The format of the main output is a report publishable online and in print Additional Quality Criteria (for all outputs) The aim of the output is to be a source for improved knowledge about future transport flows along the corridor. The output has a focus on potential development in core and comprehensive hubs within the Scania region. This is affected by the development in a broader geography especially including the Scandria corridor. The output addresses planners on different levels, politicians, freight- and logistic com- panies as well as consultants. The national forecasts includes a split in growth between the core- and comprehensive ports within the Scania region that can be questioned. The results presented in this re- port gives alternative growth numbers. These numbers can be used when planning the hinterland infrastructure. It is important to use as correct numbers as possible. Espe- cially since there are some capacity constrains affecting the hubs. Version 3, 20162, 2017-09-18 » 3 | 94 Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 Table of Contents 1 Summary ............................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Port development in Scania ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 Prognoses ............................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 10 2 Summary in Swedish – Svensk sammanfattning .............................................. 12 2.1 Hamnutveckling i Skåne ........................................................................................ 12 2.2 Prognos/scenarier ................................................................................................ 14 2.3 Slutsatser ............................................................................................................ 15 3 Introduction to Scandria®2Act ......................................................................... 17 3.1 Introduction to Work Package 3 ............................................................................. 18 3.1.1 Aim .................................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Geography .......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Geographical scope of the Scandria®2Act corridor ................................................... 18 3.2.2 Geographical scope of this report ........................................................................... 19 4 Description of the present situation ................................................................. 20 4.1 Primary ports ....................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Ports in Scania ..................................................................................................... 20 4.1.2 Environmental focus ............................................................................................. 20 4.2 Port of Helsingborg ............................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Development potential .......................................................................................... 21 4.2.3 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 21 4.3 Copenhagen Malmö Port (CMP) .............................................................................. 21 4.3.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Development potential .......................................................................................... 22 4.3.3 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 22 4.4 Trelleborg ............................................................................................................ 22 4.4.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 22 4.4.2 Development ....................................................................................................... 22 4.4.3 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 22 4.5 Ystad .................................................................................................................. 23 4.5.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 23 4.5.2 Development ....................................................................................................... 23 4.5.3 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 23 4.6 Compilation of present RoRo/RoPax and Feeder lines ................................................ 23 4.7 Logistics areas in Scania ....................................................................................... 24 4.8 German ports ...................................................................................................... 25 4.9 Port of Hamburg................................................................................................... 25 4.9.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 25 4.9.2 Operations .......................................................................................................... 26 4.9.3 Development potential .......................................................................................... 26 Version 3, 20162, 2017-09-18 » 4 | 94 Analysis of Potential Development for Strategic Freight Hubs Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 4.9.4 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 26 4.10 Port of Lübeck ...................................................................................................... 26 4.10.1 Operations .......................................................................................................... 26 4.10.2 Development potential .......................................................................................... 27 4.10.3 Hinterland access ................................................................................................. 27 4.11 Rostock ..............................................................................................................