Nicaragua: an Unfinished Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nicaragua: an Unfinished Revolution 1 Smash the Contras! Workers to Power! Nicaragua: An Unfinished Revolution The Nicaragua/Iran/hostage imbroglio that has en- ‘‘turn the other cheek’’ and free 7,000 members of Anas- gulfed the Reagan government in recent months has tasio Somoza’s murderous praetorian guard proved to provided plenty of material for political columnists and be an expensive mistake. These same guardsmen today cartoonists. Jimmy Carter’s fanatically anti-communist constitute the backbone of Washington’s proxy army. To national security man, Zbigniew Brzezinski, com- date they have killed more than 18,000 Nicaraguans and mented sourly: ‘‘In Western Europe, there is derision at wounded an equivalent number. the way America tried to pursue a would-be Machiavel- In addition to the direct economic damage inflicted lian policy in a manner more reminiscent of Inspector by the contras, the cost of fighting the war is an immense Clouseau.’’ San Francisco Chronicle columnist Alice Kahn drain on the economy. Some 120,000 people have been dubbed the affair the ‘‘Ayatollah, Ron & Ollie Show,’’ forced to become refugees in their own country. Twelve while right-wing commentator William Safire whines percent of the work force serves in the armed forces. To that it is probably the ‘‘Gipperdaemmerung’’ for the finance the war, which eats up half of all government previously teflon-coated chief North American state ter- expenditure, spending on housing, health care and edu- rorist. cation has been cut to little more than a third of what it Besides showing the Reagan gang’s contempt for the was in 1980-82 (Barricada Internacional, 28 August 1986). niceties of constitutional checks and balances, the scan- This erosion of social programs in turn undermines the dal has also revealed that there is little support even revolution’s popular base. among the far right for the contra losers. Administration While the war has seriously strained the Nicaraguan officials now admit that nearly all the ‘‘private’’ money economy, on the battlefield the contras have been raised for the contras has come directly or indirectly chewed up by the effective and highly motivated sol- from the U.S. government. diers of the Sandinista popular army. The 15 December What’s more, it turns out that the contra chiefs’ com- 1986 New York Times reported: ‘‘With their support in mitment to free enterprise is not merely ideological. Central America at an all-time low, the contras and their They are fiscal ‘‘pragmatists’’ and have not passed up the Administration backers are now in an 11th-hour scram- opportunity presented by Reagan’s largess to branch out ble to reverse four years of failure....At this point almost into some lucrative sidelines, like laundering money and no informed analyst gives the rebels much chance of smuggling drugs. The U.S. General Accounting Office success.’’ estimates that of the $27 million Congress allocated to But the contras don’t necessarily need a military vic- fund the counterrevolution in 1985, ‘‘most of it went to tory to fulfill their function. Elliott Abrams, Reagan’s top private rebel bank accounts in the Cayman Islands or the Latin American specialist, reiterated the administra- Bahamas, to private individuals or corporations in the tion’s commitment to the contra strategy and asserted, United States, and to the Honduran armed forces’’ (New ‘‘if this current U.S. policy is maintained, it seems to me York Times, 19 June 1986). the Sandinistas will not survive. Either they will be This kind of bad publicity fueled Washington’s grow- forced to compromise, or refusing to compromise, the ing disaffection with Reagan’s ‘‘freedom fighters’’ and Nicaraguan people will rise up and get rid of them’’ (New helped prompt the various Congressional investigations York Times, 9 January). The same article reports that into contra wrongdoing. It also contributed to an open ‘‘some senior State Department officials...have ex- split between the State Department’s ‘‘human face’’ con- pressed concern that the Administration is becoming so tras (represented by Arturo Cruz) and the CIA’s opera- tightly locked into an anti-Sandinista policy that if the tional wing headed by Adolfo Calero. But these are only contras falter on the battlefield, pressure may build up tactical differences. The American bourgeoisie is funda- within the Administration to commit American forces mentally united on the need to roll back the Nicaraguan on their behalf.’’ revolution, a point underlined by the bipartisan support Yet there are serious differences within the bourgeoi- for the $100 million voted for Reagan’s terrorists last sie over the advisability of direct U.S. intervention. The summer. Center for Defense Information estimates a U.S. invasion of Nicaragua would cost 5,000 U.S. deaths and $10 bil- The Contra War: Squeezing lion in the first four years of what would likely be a Nicaragua’s Economy prolonged and bloody occupation. The more farsighted elements of the ruling class have a sense that the poten- The U.S. has so far opted for squeezing the fragile tial risks of such a military adventure, with two-thirds Nicaraguan economy while organizing and arming the of the American populace opposed from the outset, far contra mercenaries. The Sandinistas’ 1979 decision to outweigh any possible benefits. 2 In the event that the U.S. does attack, it is the duty of Nicaragua and quickly disappeared from store shelves; American revolutionists to ensure that the Pentagon’s the products were bought up to be sold in neighboring worst fears come true. That means mass mobilizations countries at prices ten times higher.’’ in the streets, on the campuses and particularly in the The ‘‘magic of the marketplace’’ has translated into black and Hispanic communities. But the most impor- food shortages and rationing. Last summer Vice Presi- tant task will be to agitate in the unions for political dent Sergio Ramirez Mercado remarked: ‘‘We are expe- strikes against the invasion. The American working class riencing the worst moments since the triumph of the has the social and economic power to do more than just Sandinista revolution, a crisis so profound that even break a few windows----it can stop U.S. intervention in supplying foods is very difficult’’ (New York Times, 14 its tracks by interrupting production, communications August 1986). and transportation. The growth of the black market is disintegrating the proletariat. Thousands of Nicaraguan workers have quit A Revolution Cannot Serve Two Masters their jobs to become peddlers in the black market be- cause they cannot survive on the wages they earn. The Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) Skilled workers who leave the factories to go into busi- came to power in 1979 with a program of egalitarian, ness for themselves can make ten times as much as those petty-bourgeois nationalism garnished with a sprin- who stay. The absorption of hundreds of teachers, doc- kling of Marxist rhetoric. The political parameters of the tors, engineers, middle-level administrators and other revolution were recently reiterated by Comandante vitally necessary professionals and skilled laborers into Humberto Ortega: ‘‘This historical stage we are going the ‘‘parallel economy’’ is putting a tremendous strain through in Nicaragua is fundamentally one of national on an already overburdened social and economic infra- liberation. We cannot address national liberation and structure. NACLA Reports (April/May 1986) com- social liberation at the same time, it would be too diffi- mented, ‘‘The black economy...originally seen as a safety cult’’ (Barricada Internacional, 31 July 1986). valve, has become a gaping hole that threatens to over- This is exactly wrong. Nicaragua had its own flag, whelm the whole economic fabric.’’ postage stamps and seat in the United Nations under Even many left-liberal Sandinista well-wishers are Somoza. If by ‘‘national liberation’’ Ortega means free- slowly coming to realize that the Nicaraguan revolution dom from neo-colonial dependence on the United is in deep trouble. Here is how Paul Berman summed up States, this cannot be won until the revolution cuts off the current situation in the December 1986 issue of the imperialist connection at its roots----private owner- Mother Jones: ship of the productive wealth of society. The Nicaraguan capitalists are both the agents and the partners of the ‘‘The war must be won. Therefore the government American multinationals. To liberate Nicaragua from its enforces a military draft. Labor productivity must rise. historic relationship of neo-colonial dependency, it is Therefore the government squeezes the workers. Profit- necessary to eliminate the ‘‘free enterprise’’ system that able sectors of the economy must be encouraged. There- consigns the masses of the region to desperate poverty. fore the government grants as many favors as it can bear The entire history of the Nicaraguan revolution to to the big capitalist cotton and coffee farmers. A govern- date underlines this fundamental point. From the very ment that enforces a draft, squeezes the workers, favors beginning the FSLN’s attempts to enlist the support of the capitalists, and does all this in the name of socialism, the Nicaraguan bourgeoisie in a struggle for ‘‘national so that workers and capitalists both feel betrayed----such liberation’’ have met with disdain. Since 1979, the capi- a government is bound for trouble.... talists have been decapitalizing as fast as they can, and ‘‘The quandary, then, is: the government must act, and sending the proceeds to Miami or investing them in the powerfully. It needs more support than ever. But it does black market. not have more support. It has less. Something must give.’’ The FSLN’s Barricada Internacional (27 March 1986) The workers are neither blind nor stupid. They know described the dilemma of the ‘‘mixed economy’’: ‘‘...why not stabilize the economy by keeping profit mar- that the concessions to the bourgeoisie come directly at gins, prices and salaries at a level that would assure the expense of their living standards.
Recommended publications
  • Haiirlfphtpr Hpralji for a Dinah ) Manchester — a City of Village Charm Ntaln- a Risk 30 Cents >D the Saturday, Nov
    lostt: n.) (In (CC) <^Ns >ldfa- fendt. Ovaf' » ' An K>IV8S world. nvtta* »ii. (90 n Plc- :tantly leen- HaiirlfpHtPr HpralJi for a Dinah ) Manchester — A City of Village Charm ntaln- a risk 30 Cents >d the Saturday, Nov. 14.1987 y with n. W ill O 'Q ill ytallar lapra- Y> dfl* Tiny ‘FIRST STEF BY ORTEGA i in an tty by , John Contras I Evil' ito an f Den- criticize 1971. peace plan 1/ WASHINGTON (AP) — Nicara­ guan President Daniel Ortega on Friday laid out a detailed plan for reaching a cease-fire in three weeks with the Contras fighting his leftist government and a mediator agreed to carry the proposal to the U.S.-backed rebels. Ortega, indicating flexibility, called his plan “ a proposal, not an ultimatum." Contra leaders, react­ ing to news reports in Miami, criticized the plan and termed it "a proposal for anorderly surrender.” Ortega's 11-point plan was re­ ceived by Nicaraguan Cardinal Miguel Obando y Bravo, who agreed to act as a mediator between the two sides. The prelate planned to convey Ortega’s offer to the Contras and seek a response, opening cease-fire negotiations. The plan calls for a cease-fire to begin on Dec. 5 and for rebel troops inside Nicaragua to move to one of three cease-fire zones. The rebels would lay down their arms on Jan. 5 before independent observers, and then be granted amnesty. The plan specifies that Contras in the field are not to get any military supplies during the cease-fire, but would allow food, clothing and medical care to be provided them by a neutral international agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Abrams Says Resignation of Uno Leader Arturo Cruz Heavy Blow to Contra Movement Deborah Tyroler
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 2-13-1987 Abrams Says Resignation Of Uno Leader Arturo Cruz Heavy Blow To Contra Movement Deborah Tyroler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation Tyroler, Deborah. "Abrams Says Resignation Of Uno Leader Arturo Cruz Heavy Blow To Contra Movement." (1987). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen/432 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 077109 ISSN: 1089-1560 Abrams Says Resignation Of Uno Leader Arturo Cruz Heavy Blow To Contra Movement by Deborah Tyroler Category/Department: General Published: Friday, February 13, 1987 At a Feb. 11 meeting with more than 200 top university educators at the State Department, Asst. Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs Elliott Abrams said the resignation of Arturo Cruz from the United Nicaraguan Opposition (UNO) would deal a heavy blow to the contra movement. In view of Cruz's reported resignation, Abrams said the contra forces are discussing what constitutes a "better structure, a more effective structure...You must remember that support for the opposition is directly proportional to its effectiveness." At a recent press conference UNO leader Adolfo Calero refused to comment on the resignation
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE-Tuesday, June 5, 1984 the Senate Met at 11 A.M
    June 5, 1984 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE 14931 SENATE-Tuesday, June _5, 1984 The Senate met at 11 a.m. and was SENATE SCHEDULE The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem­ called to order by the Honorable Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, today pore. Without objection, it is so or­ DANIEL J. EVANS, a Senator from the the Senate convenes pursuant to the dered. State of Washington. adjournment of yesterday. Under the Mr. BAKER. Of course, this is to ac­ order previously entered, the reading commodate the requirement for Sena­ PRAYER of the Journal is dispensed with, no tors to attend caucuses by both par­ The Chaplain, the Reverend Rich­ resolutions may come over under the ties, which are held away from the ard C. Halverson, D.D., offered the fol­ rule, the call of the calendar has been Senate Chamber. lowing prayer: dispensed with, and morning hour has Mr. President, I do not anticipate been deemed to have expired. that today will be a late day, but, once Let us pray. Mr. President, this is no surprise, of more, I do expect us to be in for a full Gracious Father in Heaven, we ac­ course, to the minority leader as to week, including Friday. knowledge the abundance which Thou why that was done yesterday. It cre­ Mr. President, there is a messenger hast lavished upon us. We live in ated a new legislative day in the at the door from the House of Repre­ luxury compared to most people in the Senate with respect to the availability sentatives. world including many in our land­ of measures which have now reached some just a few blocks from this build­ the calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's Foundering Fathers: the Contras and Contragate
    AUSTRALIAN LEFT REVIEW 31 WASHINGTON'S FOUNDERING FATHERS The Contras and Contragate Barry Carr Contragate revealed the depth of Washington's commitment to the Contras. But it hasn't made life any easier for Nicaragua. here is no issue closer to the footsteps of the Founding Fathers of million) to the Contras, Reagan heart of the Reagan administ­ the United States, and has likened commented "I'm sure it put a smile T ration than its crusade against them to Simon Bolivar, the French on the face ofthe Statue ofLiberty".1 the Sandinista government of Resistance and, most recently and Nicaragua. President Reagan is bizarrely, the Abratlam Lincoln Support for the Nicaraguan completely besotted with the Brigade of the Spanish Civil War. counter-revolution is the best Contras. He has described them as When the US Co!!gress finall3 voted, example of the US's grotesque efforts freedom fighters following in the in JuJy 1986, to renew aid ($100 at "symmetry" - i.e. the attempt to AUSTRALIAN LEFT REVIEW 33 mtmtc and counter the Soviet Union's alleged instigation of national liberation movements by fomenting anti-communist insurgencies in regions of the world where US hegemony is threatened by nationalist and socialist states. The Contras emerged from the ranks of the hated National Guard who fled to Honduras and Costa Rica following on the fall of the Somoza dynasty in 1979. The bedraggled and demoralised Somocistas in Honduras were reorganised by the CIA during 1981, receiving $19 million in US government funds, and training from Argentine military advisers who had been blooded in the ferocious "dirty war" of 1976-81 in which 25-30,000 Argentine civilians were murdered.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua= a Blueprint for Democracy
    558 , . ,. .. .. .. _..I..i.:... I., I I .. 1." . January 20, 1987 ... .. ~ .. -... NICARAGUA= A BLUEPRINT FOR DEMOCRACY INTRODUCTION The democratic aspirations of Nicaraguans have been suppressed by dictatorships of both left and right for most of their nation's history. Yet the chances for democracy's emergence in Nicaragua seem better now than ever before. Just this week, the United Nicaraguan Opposition (UNO) and the Southern Opposition Bloc (BOS) issued a manifesto, which is a democratic alternative to the Sandinista political program. When the Marxist Sandinista regime is finally overthrown by these nationalist democratic forces, Nicaraguans will need the support and cooperation of the Western democracies in developing a truly pluralist system of government and rebuilding their nation's..economy. With the tide in Latin America now running strongly in favor of democracy, Nicaragua could follow the example of' Argentina, Ecuador, Uruguay, and other nations that have experienced a transition from military dictatorship to democratic rule. To do so, however, Nicaragua will need a blueprint for building democracy, once the current Marxist-Leninist Sandinista-regime collapses. Such a plan for pluralism should include: o Drafting a timetable for truly free and fair national elections, beginning with the election of a constituent assembly and ending with concurrent elections for a president, a legislative assembly, and mayoralties/municipal councils; o Assuring Nicaragua's Indian, Creole, and other minorities that they will be free to follow their unique cultural and religious practices in perpetuity; o Revitalizing the Nicaraguan economy through sweeping structural economic reforms: legal guarantee of private property rights; streamlining the government bureaucracy: and privatization of state-owned holdings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ends of Modernization: Development, Ideology, and Catastrophe in Nicaragua After the Alliance for Progress
    THE ENDS OF MODERNIZATION: DEVELOPMENT, IDEOLOGY, AND CATASTROPHE IN NICARAGUA AFTER THE ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESS A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by David Johnson Lee December 2015 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Richard Immerman, Advisory Chair, History, Temple University Dr. Harvey Neptune, History, Temple University Dr. David Farber, History, University of Kansas Dr. Michel Gobat, History, University of Iowa © Copyright 2015 by David Johnson Lee All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation traces the cultural and intellectual history of Nicaragua from the heyday of modernization as ideology and practice in the 1960s, when U.S. planners and politicians identified Nicaragua as a test case for the Alliance for Progress, to the triumph of neoliberalism in the 1990s. The modernization paradigm, implemented through collusion between authoritarian dictatorship and the U.S. development apparatus, began to fragment following the earthquake that destroyed Managua in 1972. The ideas that constituted this paradigm were repurposed by actors in Nicaragua and used to challenge the dominant power of the U.S. government, and also to structure political competition within Nicaragua. Using interviews, new archival material, memoirs, novels, plays, and newspapers in the United States and Nicaragua, I trace the way political actors used ideas about development to make and unmake alliances within Nicaragua, bringing about first the Sandinista Revolution, then the Contra War, and finally the neoliberal government that took power in 1990. I argue that because of both a changing international intellectual climate and resistance on the part of the people of Nicaragua, new ideas about development emphasizing human rights, pluralism, entrepreneurialism, indigenous rights, and sustainable development came to supplant modernization theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1988 Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance Suzanne B. Goldberg Columbia Law School, [email protected] Lee Crawford Kevin Reed John Tennant Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Suzanne B. Goldberg, Lee Crawford, Kevin Reed & John Tennant, Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance, 1 HARV. HUM. RTS. YB. 260 (1988). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1109 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Rights Yearbook / Vol. 1 NICARAGUA: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance The question of providing aid to the Nicaraguan Resistance has been significant to United States human rights policy throughout the Rea- gan Administration. Although events have changed repeatedly during the winter of 1988, including a truce between the Nicaraguan Gov- ernment and the Resistance and a Congressional decision not to provide military aid to the Resistance, the underlying policy issues remain constant. The Harvard Human Rights Yearbook presents two notes, infra, discussing the Military Construction Appropriations Act of 1987, which granted $100 million in aid to the Nicaraguan Resis- tance. The first note discusses the Nicaraguan Human Rights Asso- ciation (Asociacidn Nicaraguense Pro-Derechos Humanos "ANPDH"), a human rights organization sponsored and funded by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Leader Arturo Cruz Resigns: Political Will for Democratic Reforms Within Contra Movement Not Visible Deborah Tyroler
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 3-11-1987 Contra Leader Arturo Cruz Resigns: Political Will For Democratic Reforms Within Contra Movement Not Visible Deborah Tyroler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation Tyroler, Deborah. "Contra Leader Arturo Cruz Resigns: Political Will For Democratic Reforms Within Contra Movement Not Visible." (1987). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen/496 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 076960 ISSN: 1089-1560 Contra Leader Arturo Cruz Resigns: Political Will For Democratic Reforms Within Contra Movement Not Visible by Deborah Tyroler Category/Department: General Published: Wednesday, March 11, 1987 On March 9, Arturo Cruz, one of three chieftains of the United Nicaraguan Opposition (UNO), resigned after months of bitter conflict within the contra movement. In a formal letter of resignation (published the next day in the MIAMI HERALD), Cruz said his time had run out in terms of waiting for genuine democratic reforms to take place in the movement. In a telephone interview from Costa Rica with NEW YORK TIMES reporter James LeMoyne, Cruz said he did not see the political will among the rebels to make major changes, so he had decided to resign. "I remain a firm opponent of the present Sandinista regime and a backer of the democratic cause in Nicaragua," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolfo Calero Talks on Freedom Bowling Balls!
    Soviets enjoy Seniors: A chance to speak out Wrestlers at top the U.S. of performance on coeducation See page 4 See page 6 See page 5 • .. tum t WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSIT Y L EXINGTON, VIRGINIA VOLUME 88, NO. J.3 JANUARY 26, 1989 1 By f\.1arle Dunne 'ttudcnt seJtual harcJs\n1Cntf being a cauon of Women at the As.'lOCiation of Starr Reporter problem on th1' campus.·· s:ud Anecc An1encan Colleges as reported tn Mt:C'Iuud, A'o~1ate Dean of Student., "The Clas'iroom Climate for • .. m~tt!(llli' lum dt'HIIfllf('c/ I 11n~ for Minority and lntemauonal Af· Women." by Bernice R. Sandler, Th~ tht• dm ht• /o pmft.'\.\1)/ I cllkt'tl me 1t1 faar.. American Woman 1987-88. • 1lt•tp 11'1111 lum • u IVu\hmgum mul McCloud. the admini\Lrator who " We are on a par with other college u e fm~ttlr \twh m handll~ compl:unt' und conducl't tn· campu.~. especially of the same That remarK 1' un eM:crpt lrom a ve'ttigauons of~ of faculty to ~tu type." !>Did McCloud. who srud she is 1 letter to the edator m tha ~ i''uc of The dent hara.~\rnent , declined to g1ve ranlang W&L according to articles Ring-tum Ph1, and 11 andu.:atc' that SjX.'CJiic mfonnauon on the number or 'lhe hru. read on sexual hara.c;sment. ~x ual haru,!tn>ent ot Mudcrw. hy fa­ nature of any c~e~ of faculty to Mu· However, she pointed out that preva­ ' cult) i' OCI.u rring on the W&l cam­ dent hara.'tsmcnt at W&L.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit of Edgar Chamorro
    _TNTERNATIONAL COURT a JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING MILITAXY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVIPI ES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA V. UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA) mFIDAVIT OF EDGAR CHAMORRO September 5, 1985 AFFIDAVIT EDGAR EHAMORRQ City of Washington 1 ) ss: District of Columbia ) I, EDGAR CHAMORRO, being first duly sworn, depose and say the following: 1. I am a citizen of Nicaragua. I was born in Granada, Nicaragua on July 23, 1931. I presently reside in the United States of America wit$ my wife and two children, at 640 Allendale Road, Key Biscayne, Florida. I have applied to the Government of the United States for permanent resident status so that I can live permanently in the United States. i am currently awaiting final action on my application. I have been advised by my attorneys that I should not travel outside the United States until my application for permanent resident status is formally approved; travel outside the United States at the present time, according to my attorneys, could prejudice my application and result in my being permanently excluded from the United States. Since I am unable to appear in person before the International Court of Justice, I submitting my testimony to the Court in written form. 2. I will begin by describing my background. I was raised in Nicaragua. At the age of 19, I joined the Jesuit order of the Roman Catholic Church, and subsequently became a Roman Catholic priest. I studied at the following Jesuit-affiliated institutions: Catholic University in Quito, Ecuador; St. Louis University in St. Louis, Missouri; and Marquette University in I : Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E1242 HON. TED POE HON. BILL FLORES HON. DAVID RIVERA HON. KENNY MARCHANT HON
    E1242 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks July 12, 2012 REMEMBERING MICHIGAN STATE States by U.S. News & World Report every 30,000 men in the field—more than the Sandi- SENATOR BILL VAN year since the rankings began in 1983. nistas ever had in their fight against the REGENMORTER Rice also ranks among the 10 best value Somoza regime. private colleges by Princeton Review. The decade-long effort to oppose the Sandi- HON. TED POE The James A. Baker III Institute for public nistas received typical on-again off-again sup- OF TEXAS policy at Rice is world renowned for its con- port from a fickle U.S. Congress. During that IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tributions as a think tank. time, Soviet-Cuban support for communist Rice has constituently been ranked among Thursday, July 12, 2012 governments and insurgencies in Nicaragua, the top 20 universities in the U.S. overall and El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Mex- Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today for Hispanic students. ico was steadfast. Their goal was to spread to honor the life of a leader in the victims’ Rice University is one of three Tier One re- communism throughout the hemisphere and rights movement, former Michigan State Sen- search and education universities in Texas. up to the southern border of the United States. ator Bill van Regenmorter. Rice is ranked the number 4 best value Central America was engaged in an epic It was fitting that flags in Michigan were among private Universities. struggle and Nicaragua was the epicenter. flown at half-mast following Bill’s death.
    [Show full text]
  • S Ijfsta REVOLUTION
    NEWS COVE~AGE S iJfsTA REVOLUTION NEWS COVE~AGE REVOLUTION By Joshua Muravchik With a foreword by Pablo Antonio Cuadra, Editor ofLA PRENSA American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Washington, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. Publication of this volume is made possible by a grant from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc. Distributed by arrangement with UPA, Inc. 4720 Boston Way 3 Henrietta Street Lanham, MD 20706 London WC2E 8LU England ISBN 0-8447-3661-9 (alk. paper) ISBN 0-8447-3662-7 (pbk.: alk. paper) AEI Studies 476 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Muravchik, Joshua. News coverage of the Sandinista revolution / Joshua Muravchik. p. cm. - (AEI studies; 476) Includes bibliographies. ISBN 0-8447-3661-9 (alk. paper). ISBN 0-8447-3662-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Foreign news-United States-History. 2. Press and politics­ United States-History. 3. Nicaragua-Politics and government-1937-1979. 4. Nicaragua-History-Revolution, 1979. 5. Public opinion-United States. 6. Nicaragua-History­ Revolution, 1979-Foreign public opinion, American. I. Title. II. Series. PN4888.F69M87 1988 972.85'052-dcI9 88-10553 CIP © 1988 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Re­ search, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publica­ tion may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]