Stenographischer Bericht 103. Sitzung
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dr. Otto Graf Lambsdorff F.D.P
Plenarprotokoll 13/52 Deutscher Bundestag Stenographischer Bericht 52. Sitzung Bonn, Donnerstag, den 7. September 1995 Inhalt: Zur Geschäftsordnung Dr. Uwe Jens SPD 4367 B Dr. Peter Struck SPD 4394B, 4399A Dr. Otto Graf Lambsdorff F.D.P. 4368B Joachim Hörster CDU/CSU 4395 B Kurt J. Rossmanith CDU/CSU . 4369 D Werner Schulz (Berlin) BÜNDNIS 90/DIE Dr. Norbert Blüm, Bundesminister BMA 4371 D GRÜNEN 4396 C Rudolf Dreßler SPD 4375 B Jörg van Essen F.D.P. 4397 C Eva Bulling-Schröter PDS 4397 D Dr. Gisela Babel F.D.P 4378 A Marieluise Beck (Bremen) BÜNDNIS 90/ Tagesordnungspunkt 1 (Fortsetzung): DIE GRÜNEN 4379 C a) Erste Beratung des von der Bundesre- Hans-Joachim Fuchtel CDU/CSU . 4380 C gierung eingebrachten Entwurfs eines Rudolf Dreßler SPD 4382A Gesetzes über die Feststellung des Annelie Buntenbach BÜNDNIS 90/DIE Bundeshaushaltsplans für das Haus- GRÜNEN 4384 A haltsjahr 1996 (Haushaltsgesetz 1996) (Drucksache 13/2000) Dr. Gisela Babel F.D.P 4386B Manfred Müller (Berlin) PDS 4388B b) Beratung der Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung Finanzplan des Bun- Ulrich Heinrich F D P. 4388 D des 1995 bis 1999 (Drucksache 13/2001) Ottmar Schreiner SPD 4390 A Dr. Günter Rexrodt, Bundesminister BMWi 4345 B Dr. Norbert Blüm CDU/CSU 4390 D - Ernst Schwanhold SPD . 4346D, 4360 B Gerda Hasselfeldt CDU/CSU 43928 Anke Fuchs (Köln) SPD 4349 A Dr. Jürgen Rüttgers, Bundesminister BMBF 4399B Dr. Hermann Otto Solms F.D.P. 4352A Doris Odendahl SPD 4401 D Birgit Homburger F D P. 4352 C Günter Rixe SPD 4401 D Ernst Hinsken CDU/CSU 4352B, 4370D, 4377 C Dr. -
Guide to the Council of the European Communities 1/1984
GenE:!rai__Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 1/1984 CO C\1 w w {) This publication is also available in: DA ISBN 92-824-0165-0 DE ISBN 92-824-0166-9 GR ISBN 92-824-0167-7 FR ISBN 92-824-0169-3 IT ISBN 92-824-0170-7 NL ISBN 92-824-0171-5 ' ' Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1984 ISBN 92-824-0168-5 Catalogue number: BX-40-84-117 -EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC. Brussels· Luxembourg, 1984 Printed in Belgium General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 1 January 1984 2 CONTENTS pages Council of the European Communities .......... 5 Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States. 7 Presidency of the Council . 8 List of Representatives of the Government of the Member States who regularly take part in Council meetings. 9 Belgium . 10 Denmark. 11 Germany............ 12 Greece ............. 14 France .. 16 Ireland..... 18 Italy. 19 Luxembourg 20 Netherlands. 21 United Kingdom. 22 Permanent Representatives Committee . 25 COREPER 11. 26 COREPER I 28 Article 113 Committee. 30 Special Committee on Agriculture . 30 Standing Committee on Employment. .. 30 Standing Committee on Uranium Enrichment (COPENUR). 31 Scientific and Technical Research Committee (CREST) .. 31 Energy Committee ........ 32 Education Committee. 32 Select Committee on Co-Operation Agreements between the Member States and third countries . 33 Working Parties .. 33 Permanent Representations .. 35 Belgium. 36 Denmark. 41 Germany ... 47 Greece. 54 France. 63 Irland. -
Interview with J.D. Bindenagel
Library of Congress Interview with J.D. Bindenagel The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR J.D. BINDENAGEL Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: February 3, 1998 Copyright 2002 ADST Q: Today is February 3, 1998. The interview is with J.D. Bindenagel. This is being done on behalf of The Association for Diplomatic Studies. I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. J.D. and I are old friends. We are going to include your biographic sketch that you included at the beginning, which is really quite full and it will be very useful. I have a couple of questions to begin. While you were in high school, what was your interest in foreign affairs per se? I know you were talking politics with Mr. Frank Humphrey, Senator Hubert Humphrey's brother, at the Humphrey Drugstore in Huron, South Dakota, and all that, but how about foreign affairs? BINDENAGEL: I grew up in Huron, South Dakota and foreign affairs in South Dakota really focused on our home town politician Senator and Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey. Frank, Hubert Humphrey's brother, was our connection to Washington, DC, and the center of American politics. We followed Hubert's every move as Senator and Vice President; he of course was very active in foreign policy, and the issues that concerned South Dakota's farmers were important to us. Most of farmers' interests were in their wheat sales, and when we discussed what was happening with wheat you always had to talk about the Russians, who were buying South Dakota wheat. -
EUSA Boyleschuenemann April 15
The Malleable Politics of Activation Reform: the‘Hartz’ Reforms in Comparative Perspective Nigel Boyle[[email protected]] and Wolf Schünemann [[email protected]] Paper for 2009 EUSA Biennial Conference, April 25, Los Angeles. Abstract In this paper we compare the Hartz reforms in Germany with three other major labor market activation reforms carried out by center-left governments. Two of the cases, Britain and Germany, involved radically neoliberal “mandatory” activation policies, whereas in the Netherlands and Ireland radical activation change took a very different “enabling” form. Two of the cases, Ireland and Germany, were path deviant, Britain and the Netherlands were path dependent. We explain why Germany underwent “mandatory” and path deviant activation by focusing on two features of the policy discourse. First, the coordinative (or elite level) discourse was “ensilaged” sealing policy formation off from dissenting actors and, until belatedly unwrapped for enactment, from the wider communicative (legitimating) discourse. This is what the British and German cases had in common and the result was reform that viewed long term unemployment as personal failure rather than market failure. Second, although the German policy-making system lacked the “authoritative” features that facilitated reform in the British case, and the Irish policy- making system lacked the “reflexive” mechanisms that facilitated reform in the Dutch case, in both Germany and Ireland the communicative discourses were reshaped by novel institutional vehicles (the Hartz Commission in the German case, FÁS in the Irish case) that served to fundamentally alter system- constitutive perceptions about policy. In the Irish and German cases “government by commission” created a realignment of advocacy coalitions with one coalition acquiring a new, ideologically-dominant and path deviating narrative. -
SEMINAR DER FRIEDRICH-NAUMANN-STIFTUNG (3.-5.7.81) "Frauen Und Bundeswehr"
INHALTSVERZEICHNIS • SEITE Vorwort 3 I - SEMINAR DER FRIEDRICH-NAUMANN-STIFTUNG (3.-5.7.81) "Frauen und Bundeswehr" . Programm 8 . Teilnehmerliste 1o • Referate: Monika Faßbender-IIge 13 Wolf R. Leenen 17 Tjarck Rößler 26 Hans Vorländer 36 Hans-Erich Seuberlich 49 Sibylle Plogstedt 54 Mechthild Jansen 61 Berthold Meyer 69 Eva Ehrlich 75 Heide Hering 81 Gisela Nischelsky 86 Elke Leistner 92 Brigitte Traupe 95 Rita Fromm 99 Petra Kelly 1o1 . Ergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe I 1o5 . Ergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe II 1o9 . Ergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe III 112 . Erfahrungsbericht 115 . Brief des Bundesverteidigungsministeriums 118 II - HISTORISCHE ENTWICKLUNG . Franz W. Seidler - Von der Antike bis zum stehenden Heer - 122 III - GESETZLICHE GRUNDLAGEN . Regelung im Grundgesetz 13o IV - MATERIALIEN ZUR DISKUSSION . Ariane Barth, - Etwas anderes als Sex - aus:"Spiegel'',46/1978 136 . Auszüge aus:''dpa-hintergrund'',11.4.1979, - Wehrdienst für Frauen ? - 142 . Lippert/Rößler - Weibliche Soldaten für die Bundeswehr ? - aus:"beilage zur wochenzeitung das parlament", B8/1981 148 . Ekkehard Lippert, - Soldat ohne Waffen ? - aus:"Frau und Gesamtverteidigung,Bulletin des Schweizerischen Arbeitskreises Militär + Sozialwissenschaften",Nr.2/1982 154 . Karin Hempel-Soos, - Karbolmäuschen und Stöpselmädchen - aus:"Die Zeit",Nr.28,9.7.1982 16o . Gerste/Hempel-Soos/Roggenkamp, - Ende der Schonzeit - aus:"Die Zeit",Nr.23,3.6.1983 162 . Bonner Redaktion, - Wegen des "Pillenknicks"... aus:"Süddeutsche Zeitung",Nr.184,12.8.1983 166a Jürgen Möllemann, ...zu den Vorschlägen des BW-Verbandes - aus:"fdk-tagesdienst",Nr.681/78,19.9.1978 167 http://d-nb.info/209502614 . Liselotte Funcke, aus:"Die Welt",22.8.1979 , • - 168 . Gisela Nischelsky/JürgenMöllemann, - Pro und Contra - aus:"Neue Bonner Depesche",Nr.2/198o r . -
1 Final Report for NATO Fellowship March 1998 Mary N Hampton
1 Final Report for NATO Fellowship March 1998 Mary N Hampton University of Utah I have completed the work for my 1997-1998 NATO Research Fellowship. Because of the fellowship, I was able to finish critical secondary research and conduct many useful discussions in Germany with relevant academics and with current and past German foreign policy and security elites. My project, "The German Conception of Security: an Examination of Competing Views", has resulted in three major research papers, one which is already published, and two that are accepted for publication or under contract. I will return to these research papers below. Aside from NATO's generous assistance, the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in Sankt Augustin and the Hessische Stiftung fuer Friedens und Konflikt Forschung (HSFK), Frankfurt, were especially helpful in allowing me to carry out my research. I had offices in both institutes. The libraries in both were very useful. The HSFK has a fine collection of security journals, including the most important ones in English and German. It also has a good collection of the German party publications, which were most helpful to my work. However, most important to my project was the interaction I had with analysts and scholars at the two institutions. I am very grateful to Dr. Harald Mueller, the Director of the HSFK, for his generous assistance, and to other analysts at the institute who read my work and discussed it with me, and who helped me obtain interview partners critical to my work. Among those that assisted me most and to whom I am grateful were Drs. -
Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise Und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020
DHB Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen Stand: 29.5.2020 Seit der 2. Wahlperiode (1953–1957) bilden die Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD, seit der 3. Wahlperiode auch die FDP-Fraktion interne Arbeitskreise bzw. Arbeitsgruppen, deren Arbeitsgebiet bei der CDU/CSU-Fraktion zu Beginn der 9. Wahlperiode, bei der SPD- Fraktion während der 12. Wahlperiode der Gliederung der Bundestagsausschüsse entspricht. Die kleineren Fraktionen bzw. die Gruppen haben Arbeitsgruppen mit einem Arbeitsgebiet, das die Bereiche mehrerer Bundestagsausschüsse umfasst. Die Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen der Fraktionen sind Hilfsorgane der Fraktionsvollversammlung und dienen der fraktionsinternen Vorberatung. Arbeitsgruppen der CDU/CSU Vorsitzende der Arbeitsgruppen Wahl- (in der Regel zugleich Sprecher der Fraktionen für die einzelnen Fachgebiete) der periode CDU/CSU 12. WP 1. Recht (einschließlich Wahlprüfung, Immunität und Geschäftsordnung sowie 1990–1994 Petitionen) Norbert Geis (CSU) 2. Inneres und Sport Johannes Gerster (CDU) (bis 21.1.1992) Erwin Marschewski (CDU) (ab 21.1.1992) 3. Wirtschaft Matthias Wissmann (CDU) (bis 9.2.1993) Rainer Haungs (CDU) (ab 9.2.1993) 4. Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten Egon Susset (CDU) 5. Verkehr Dirk Fischer (CDU) 6. Post und Telekommunikation Gerhard O. Pfeffermann (CDU) (bis 6.9.1993) Elmar Müller (CDU) (ab 21.9.1993) 7. Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau Dietmar Kansy (CDU) 8. Finanzen Kurt Falthauser (CSU) (bis 9.2.1993) Hansgeorg Hauser (CSU) (ab 9.2.1993) 9. Haushalt Jochen Borchert (CDU) (bis 21.1.1993) Adolf Roth (CDU) (ab 9.2.1993) 10. Arbeit und Soziales Julius Louven (CDU) 11. Gesundheit Paul Hoffacker (CDU) Seite 1 von 34 DHB Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020 Vorsitzende der Arbeitsgruppen Wahl- (in der Regel zugleich Sprecher der Fraktionen für die einzelnen Fachgebiete) der periode CDU/CSU 12. -
Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq
Review of International Studies (2007), 33, 285–305 Copyright British International Studies Association doi:10.1017/S0260210507007516 Security communities and the habitus of restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq CORNELIU BJOLA AND MARKUS KORNPROBST* Abstract. Borrowing from Norbert Elias, we introduce the habitus of restraint to the study of security communities. This habitus constitutes a key dimension of the glue that holds security communities together. The perceived compatibility of practices emanating from the habitus that members hold fosters the collective identity upon which a security community is built. The violation of a member’s habitus by the practices of another member, however, disrupts the reproduction of collective identity and triggers a crisis of the security community. Our analysis of Germany’s reaction to Washington’s case for war against Iraq provides empirical evidence for the salience of the habitus for the internal dynamics of security communities. Introduction At first glance, it is surprising that Saddam Hussein triggered the deepest post-World War II rift in the usually amicable relationship between the United States and Germany. The two countries share many values that should have prevented action taken against a vicious dictator from becoming a contentious issue. Saddam Hussein’s longstanding record of gross human rights abuses and aggression against other states should have been yet another reason to draw the two allies even closer together. This scenario, however, failed to materialise. Not only did the United States and Germany fail to find a common ground on Iraq. They even started to fundamentally question the nature of their relationship. -
Hertkorn.Pmd
The Impact of September 11th on European Security and Defense Policy and Coercive Prevention: The German Perspective by Michaela C. Hertkorn INTRODUCTION Upon entering office, the newly elected Bush Administration put issues such as missile defense on top of its foreign and security policy agenda.1 However, given transatlantic discourse up to the attacks of September 11th, topics like the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) still seemed relevant to partners on both sides of the Atlantic. This paper shall argue that while the focus of conflict prevention lies in the prevention of the outbreak of violence, preventive diplomacy and its coercive elements also strive at preventing further regional escalation and the re-occurrence of violence. In that sense, conflict prevention is strongly linked with post-conflict peacekeeping. Transatlantic relations, particularly in the late 1990s, served as a context to organize and coordinate peacekeeping in the Balkans, with the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as the main diplomatic, political, and economic platforms in the absence of corresponding UN mandates. How are transatlantic relations relevant to the topic of conflict prevention? Given European interest in institutionalizing conflict prevention within the bodies of the EU in the second half of the 1990s, they do matter. While there were intentions to incorporate conflict prevention within the Council of Ministers, today within the EU, conflict prevention is a strong focus of the EU Commission. To mainstream conflict prevention, cooperation between the High Representative of EU Foreign and Security Policy on the one side and the EU Commission on the other side seems necessary to successfully link issues of conflict prevention with the common foreign and security policy of the EU. -
Annual Report 2011
The French Institute of International Relations Annual Report 2011 27 rue de la Procession - 75740 Paris Cedex 15 Phone: 33 (0) 1 40 61 60 00 - Fax : 33 (0) 1 40 61 60 60 Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 - 1000 - Bruxelles Phone: 32 (2) 238 51 10 - Fax : 32 (2) 238 51 15 www.ifri.org Knowledge for action Contents Message from the President 2 Ifri, a Leading French Think Tank on International Questions 4 2011: An Intense Year on All Fronts 6 In 2011, Ifri Notably Hosted… 10 Ifri’s 2011 Publications 12 Two Flagship Publications: Politique étrangère and RAMSES 13 Ifri’s Business Partners 14 Ifri and the Media: An Ongoing Dialogue 18 The 4th World Policy Conference 19 The Team 20 Research 21 Regional Programs 22 Cross-cutting Programs 37 Publications 45 Conferences and Debates 48 Board of Directors and Advisory Board 50 Financial Appendix 51 Annual Report 2011 • 1 Message from the President rom revolutions in the Arab world, crises in Europe and catastrophic events in Japan, to the intervention in Libya and the announcements of withdrawal from Afghanistan, F2011 did not lack turmoil, nor is there a shortage of questions to be asked. Even more than previous years, 2011 certainly confirmed the need for a broad view of the world in order to support political and economic decision-makers working under the pressure of events that are becoming more and more difficult to control. Such wide vision allows for analytical distance to be introduced into decision-making processes. As a unique think tank in France, and through the range of subjects it covers (international and otherwise), its long history of bringing experience and successful metho- dologies to light, and the networks it has built with partners throughout the world, Ifri seeks to promote this kind of perspective. -
Geschäftsbericht 2009 – 2011 (PDF)
GESCHÄFTSBERICHT DER FREIEN DEMOKRATISCHEN PARTEI 2009 – 2011 www.fdp.de VORWORT GESCHÄFTSBERICHT Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Parteifreundinnen, liebe Parteifreunde, WIR sind für Sie da. Rund 250 Tage im Jahr stehen die Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter der Bundesgeschäftsstelle Ihnen für Ihre Fragen, Probleme und Anregungen zur Verfügung: Täglich von 8 Uhr morgens bis 8 Uhr abends. Der Auftrag des vorangegangenen Bundesparteitages in Köln (24. April bis 25. April 2010) an den neuen Generalsekretär Christian Lindner, bis zum Bundes- parteitag 2012 ein neues Grundsatzprogramm zu erstellen, stellt auch an Ihre Bundesgeschäftsstelle erhebliche Anforderungen. Dazu kommt, dass auch von der Bundesgeschäftsstelle erwartet wird, die Arbeit der FDP-geführten Ministerien zu begleiten. Wir sind für Sie da, auch in der Programmdiskussion. Und deshalb haben wir in der Bundesgeschäftsstelle im Juni des letzten Jahres eine neue Abteilung instal- liert: die Abteilung Politische Planung, Programm und Analyse (PPA). Diese Abteilung verantwortet in erster Linie die inhaltliche Begleitung der Erarbeitung des neuen Grundsatzprogramms, betreut die Programm- kommission und die 11 eingerichteten Programmfo- ren. Auch in der Abteilung Dialog und Kampagnen wird das Motto „Wir sind für Sie da“ groß geschrieben. Neben Wir möchten in eine breite Diskussion des Grund- der Erarbeitung von Argumenten und Flugblättern zu satzprogramms in den Gliederungen vor Ort, mit den aktuellen politischen Themen steht die Planung von Landes- und Bundesfachausschüssen aber auch mit Kampagnen ebenso wie der Bürgerdialog, insbeson- der gesamten Bevölkerung eintreten. Dazu halten die dere auch via Internet, im Mittelpunkt der 9-köpfigen fünf Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter dieser Abteilung Abteilung. Allein seit September 2009 wurden durch eine Vielzahl von Anregungen für Veranstaltungen vor diese Abteilung ca. -
Constructivism in International Relations the Politics of Reality
Constructivism in International Relations The politics of reality Maja Zehfuss University of Warwick 25579CCB 42:58 84 ,2:581:B:C.2:/2CBD4CCC9 ,2:58,CB7DB22:22CCambridge Books9CCB Online 42:58© Cambridge 84CB University 9CCB5: Press, 8 2009 ,0 PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org© Maja Zehfuss 2004 First published in printed format 2002 ISBN 978-0-511-49179-5 OCeISBN ISBN 0-521-81544-4 hardback ISBN 0-521-89466-2 paperback 25579CCB 42:58 84 ,2:581:B:C.2:/2CBD4CCC9 ,2:58,CB7DB22:22CCambridge Books9CCB Online 42:58© Cambridge 84CB University 9CCB5: Press, 8 2009 ,0 Constructivism in International Relations Maja Zehfuss’ book offers a fundamental critique of constructivism, fo- cusing on the work of Wendt, Onuf and Kratochwil. Using Germany’s shift towards participation in international military operations as an illustration, she demonstrates why each version of constructivism fails in its own project and comes apart on the basis of its own assump- tions. Inspired by Derridean thought, this book highlights the political consequences of constructivist representations of reality. Each critique concludes that constructivist notions of key concepts are impossible, and that this is not merely a question of theoretical inconsistency, but of politics. The book is premised on the notion that the ‘empirical’ and the ‘theoretical’ are less separate than is acknowledged in inter- national relations, and must be read as intertwined.