DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to the Council of the European Communities 1/1984

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to the Council of the European Communities 1/1984 GenE:!rai__Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 1/1984 CO C\1 w w {) This publication is also available in: DA ISBN 92-824-0165-0 DE ISBN 92-824-0166-9 GR ISBN 92-824-0167-7 FR ISBN 92-824-0169-3 IT ISBN 92-824-0170-7 NL ISBN 92-824-0171-5 ' ' Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1984 ISBN 92-824-0168-5 Catalogue number: BX-40-84-117 -EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC. Brussels· Luxembourg, 1984 Printed in Belgium General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 1 January 1984 2 CONTENTS pages Council of the European Communities .......... 5 Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States. 7 Presidency of the Council . 8 List of Representatives of the Government of the Member States who regularly take part in Council meetings. 9 Belgium . 10 Denmark. 11 Germany............ 12 Greece ............. 14 France .. 16 Ireland..... 18 Italy. 19 Luxembourg 20 Netherlands. 21 United Kingdom. 22 Permanent Representatives Committee . 25 COREPER 11. 26 COREPER I 28 Article 113 Committee. 30 Special Committee on Agriculture . 30 Standing Committee on Employment. .. 30 Standing Committee on Uranium Enrichment (COPENUR). 31 Scientific and Technical Research Committee (CREST) .. 31 Energy Committee ........ 32 Education Committee. 32 Select Committee on Co-Operation Agreements between the Member States and third countries . 33 Working Parties .. 33 Permanent Representations .. 35 Belgium. 36 Denmark. 41 Germany ... 47 Greece. 54 France. 63 Irland.. 68 Italy ... 73 Luxembourg .. 79 3 Netherlands. 80 United Kingdom . 84 General Secretariat of the Council . 91 Private Office. 92 Legal Department 94 Directorate-general A . 96 Directorate-general B. 99 Directorate-general C 101 Directorate-general D ............. 102 Directorate-general E. 104 Directorate-general F. 106 Directorate-general G 107 Association Councils ... 109 EEC - Turkey . 110 EEC- Malta. 111 EEC- Cyprus. 112 Co-Operation Councils. 113 EEC - Algeria . 114 EEC - Morocco .. 115 EEC - Tunisia .. 116 EEC- Egypt ... 117 EEC- Jordan 118 EEC- Syria. 119 EEC - Lebanon.. 120 EEC - Israel ............ 121 EEC - Yugoslavia. 122 Council of Ministers ACP - EEC 123 Representations of the ACP-States ....... 127 Committee on Senior Officials on Scientific and Technical Research (COST). 145 4 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 1. Composition The Council consists of representatives of the Member States. Each Government delegates one of its members to the Council, the composition of wich may thus vary according to the subject before it. The office of President is held for a term of six months by each member of the Council in turn, in the following order : Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, United Kingdom. The Council meets when convened on the initiative of the President or at the request of one of its members or of the Commission. 2. Powers Following the merger ofthe institutions of the three European Communities, which took effect in 1967, a single Council took the place ofthe Special Council of Ministers of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Councils of the European Economic Community and Euratom. It exercises the powers and jurisdic­ tion conferred on those institutions in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, and of the so-called «Merger» Treaty of 1965 establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities, of the 1972 Treaty concerning the accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom, and ofthe 1979 Treaty concerning the accession of Greece. In accordance with the Rome Treaties (EEC, Euratom), the Council ensures co-ordination of the general economic policies of the Member States and has power to take decisions. All provisions of general scope or of a certain importance must be adopted by the Council but, except in a limited number of cases, the Council may act only on a proposal from the Commission. The difference between the Rome Treaties and the Paris Treaty (ECSC) is that, according to the former, it is the Council which generally takes the decision, on a proposal from the Commission, while the latter states that decisions are generally to be taken by the High Authority (now the Commission) with the assent of the Council. 3. Method of voting in the Council The EEC and Euratom Treaties state that, save as otherwise provided, the Council shall act by a majority of its members. In most cases, however, the Treaties stipulate either unanimity or qualified majority. In calculating a qualified majority, Member States have the number of votes laid down in the Treaties: Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom: 10; Belgium, Greece, Netherlands : 5; Ireland, Denmark : 3; Luxembourg : 2. Total 63. When, in pursuance of the Treaties, the Council has to act on a proposal from the Commission, 45 votes are required to attain a qualified majority. In other cases, 45 votes are necessary, cast by six countries. 5 If the Council amends a proposal from the Commission, unanimity is required for the act constituting such amendment. Abstentions do not prevent the adoption by the Council of decisions which require unanimity. As regards the ECSC, except for the special arrangements covering budget matters, decisions of the Council, other than those for which a qualified majority or unanimity is required, are taken by a vote of the majority of its members; this majority is considered to be attained if it represents an absolute majority of the representatives of the Member States, including the votes of the representatives oftwo Member States which each produce at least one eighth ofthe total value of the coal and steel output of the Community. 4. Form of Council acts For EEC and Euratom matters, Council acts may take the following forms : regulations, directives, decisions, recommendations and opinions. Regulations are general in scope, binding in their entirety and directly applicable in all Member States; directives are binding on the Member States to which they are addressed as regards the results to be achieved, but leave national authorities the power to decide the form and means; decisions, which may be addressed to a Member State, to an undertaking or to an individual, are binding in their entirety on the parties named therein; recommendations and opinions are not binding. Regulations must be published in the Officiel Journal and, save as otherwise provided, enter into force twenty days after publication. Directives and decisions take effect upon notification to the parties concerned. Apart from instruments having legal effects which are expressly mentioned in the Treaties, the Council adopts decisions on general matters and resolutions; the legal scope of such instruments is determined in each individual case. 5. Presidency of the Council The President ofthe Council who, as mentioned above, exercises his duties for a period of six months, carries out as fully as possible his role of co­ ordination. He sees to the smooth running of Council work and endeavours to find concrete solutions to the problems placed before the Council. This co­ ordinating role is of paramount importance for the harmonious development of the Community and has been further strengthened by the series of practical measures adopted by the Council in 1973 and 1974. 6 CONFERENCE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES The Treaties establishing the EEC, the ECSC and Euratom lay down that certain decisions shall be taken by common accord by the Governments of the Member States. Thus, for amendments to the EEC Treaty (Article 236 - EEC), the necessary decisions are taken by the Conference of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States. 7 Holder of the office of President of the Council over the next few years : - from 1.1 to 30.06.1984 : FRANCE - from 1.7 to 31.12.1984 : IRELAND -from 1.1 to 30.06.1985 : ITALY - from 1.7 to 31.12.1985 : LUXEMBOURG -from 1.1 to 30.06.1986 :NETHERLANDS -from 1.7 to 31.12.1986 : UNITED KINGDOM - from 1.1 to 30.06.1987 : BELGIUM -from 1.7 to 31.12.1987 : DENMARK -from 1.1 to 30.06.1988 : GERMANY -from 1.7 to 31.12.1988 : GREECE 8 LIST OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES WHO REGULARLY TAKE PART IN COUNCIL MEETINGS 9 Belgium W. DE CLERCQ Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance and External Trade L. TINDEMANS Minister for External Relations M. EYSKENS Minister for Economic Affairs H. DE CROO Minister for Communications and the Post, Telegraphs and Telephones M. HANSENNE Minister for Labour and Employment D. COENS Minister for Education Ph. MAYSTADT Minister for the Budget, Scientific Policy and Planning A. BERTOUILLE Minister for Education J.-L. DEHAENE Minister for Social Affairs and Institutional Reforms A. KEMPINAIRE State Secretary for External Trade, deputy to the Minister for Finance and External Trade E. KNOOPS State Secretary for Energy, deputy to the Minister for Economic Affairs P. DE KEERSMAEKER State Secretary for European Affairs and Agriculture, deputy to the Minister for External Relations F. AERTS State Secretary for Health and the Environment, deputy to the Minister for Social Affairs F.X. de DONNEA State Secretary for Development Co-operation, deputy to the Minister for External Relations 10 Denmark Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. Otto Graf Lambsdorff F.D.P
    Plenarprotokoll 13/52 Deutscher Bundestag Stenographischer Bericht 52. Sitzung Bonn, Donnerstag, den 7. September 1995 Inhalt: Zur Geschäftsordnung Dr. Uwe Jens SPD 4367 B Dr. Peter Struck SPD 4394B, 4399A Dr. Otto Graf Lambsdorff F.D.P. 4368B Joachim Hörster CDU/CSU 4395 B Kurt J. Rossmanith CDU/CSU . 4369 D Werner Schulz (Berlin) BÜNDNIS 90/DIE Dr. Norbert Blüm, Bundesminister BMA 4371 D GRÜNEN 4396 C Rudolf Dreßler SPD 4375 B Jörg van Essen F.D.P. 4397 C Eva Bulling-Schröter PDS 4397 D Dr. Gisela Babel F.D.P 4378 A Marieluise Beck (Bremen) BÜNDNIS 90/ Tagesordnungspunkt 1 (Fortsetzung): DIE GRÜNEN 4379 C a) Erste Beratung des von der Bundesre- Hans-Joachim Fuchtel CDU/CSU . 4380 C gierung eingebrachten Entwurfs eines Rudolf Dreßler SPD 4382A Gesetzes über die Feststellung des Annelie Buntenbach BÜNDNIS 90/DIE Bundeshaushaltsplans für das Haus- GRÜNEN 4384 A haltsjahr 1996 (Haushaltsgesetz 1996) (Drucksache 13/2000) Dr. Gisela Babel F.D.P 4386B Manfred Müller (Berlin) PDS 4388B b) Beratung der Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung Finanzplan des Bun- Ulrich Heinrich F D P. 4388 D des 1995 bis 1999 (Drucksache 13/2001) Ottmar Schreiner SPD 4390 A Dr. Günter Rexrodt, Bundesminister BMWi 4345 B Dr. Norbert Blüm CDU/CSU 4390 D - Ernst Schwanhold SPD . 4346D, 4360 B Gerda Hasselfeldt CDU/CSU 43928 Anke Fuchs (Köln) SPD 4349 A Dr. Jürgen Rüttgers, Bundesminister BMBF 4399B Dr. Hermann Otto Solms F.D.P. 4352A Doris Odendahl SPD 4401 D Birgit Homburger F D P. 4352 C Günter Rixe SPD 4401 D Ernst Hinsken CDU/CSU 4352B, 4370D, 4377 C Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with J.D. Bindenagel
    Library of Congress Interview with J.D. Bindenagel The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR J.D. BINDENAGEL Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: February 3, 1998 Copyright 2002 ADST Q: Today is February 3, 1998. The interview is with J.D. Bindenagel. This is being done on behalf of The Association for Diplomatic Studies. I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. J.D. and I are old friends. We are going to include your biographic sketch that you included at the beginning, which is really quite full and it will be very useful. I have a couple of questions to begin. While you were in high school, what was your interest in foreign affairs per se? I know you were talking politics with Mr. Frank Humphrey, Senator Hubert Humphrey's brother, at the Humphrey Drugstore in Huron, South Dakota, and all that, but how about foreign affairs? BINDENAGEL: I grew up in Huron, South Dakota and foreign affairs in South Dakota really focused on our home town politician Senator and Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey. Frank, Hubert Humphrey's brother, was our connection to Washington, DC, and the center of American politics. We followed Hubert's every move as Senator and Vice President; he of course was very active in foreign policy, and the issues that concerned South Dakota's farmers were important to us. Most of farmers' interests were in their wheat sales, and when we discussed what was happening with wheat you always had to talk about the Russians, who were buying South Dakota wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • EUSA Boyleschuenemann April 15
    The Malleable Politics of Activation Reform: the‘Hartz’ Reforms in Comparative Perspective Nigel Boyle[[email protected]] and Wolf Schünemann [[email protected]] Paper for 2009 EUSA Biennial Conference, April 25, Los Angeles. Abstract In this paper we compare the Hartz reforms in Germany with three other major labor market activation reforms carried out by center-left governments. Two of the cases, Britain and Germany, involved radically neoliberal “mandatory” activation policies, whereas in the Netherlands and Ireland radical activation change took a very different “enabling” form. Two of the cases, Ireland and Germany, were path deviant, Britain and the Netherlands were path dependent. We explain why Germany underwent “mandatory” and path deviant activation by focusing on two features of the policy discourse. First, the coordinative (or elite level) discourse was “ensilaged” sealing policy formation off from dissenting actors and, until belatedly unwrapped for enactment, from the wider communicative (legitimating) discourse. This is what the British and German cases had in common and the result was reform that viewed long term unemployment as personal failure rather than market failure. Second, although the German policy-making system lacked the “authoritative” features that facilitated reform in the British case, and the Irish policy- making system lacked the “reflexive” mechanisms that facilitated reform in the Dutch case, in both Germany and Ireland the communicative discourses were reshaped by novel institutional vehicles (the Hartz Commission in the German case, FÁS in the Irish case) that served to fundamentally alter system- constitutive perceptions about policy. In the Irish and German cases “government by commission” created a realignment of advocacy coalitions with one coalition acquiring a new, ideologically-dominant and path deviating narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise Und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020
    DHB Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen Stand: 29.5.2020 Seit der 2. Wahlperiode (1953–1957) bilden die Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD, seit der 3. Wahlperiode auch die FDP-Fraktion interne Arbeitskreise bzw. Arbeitsgruppen, deren Arbeitsgebiet bei der CDU/CSU-Fraktion zu Beginn der 9. Wahlperiode, bei der SPD- Fraktion während der 12. Wahlperiode der Gliederung der Bundestagsausschüsse entspricht. Die kleineren Fraktionen bzw. die Gruppen haben Arbeitsgruppen mit einem Arbeitsgebiet, das die Bereiche mehrerer Bundestagsausschüsse umfasst. Die Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen der Fraktionen sind Hilfsorgane der Fraktionsvollversammlung und dienen der fraktionsinternen Vorberatung. Arbeitsgruppen der CDU/CSU Vorsitzende der Arbeitsgruppen Wahl- (in der Regel zugleich Sprecher der Fraktionen für die einzelnen Fachgebiete) der periode CDU/CSU 12. WP 1. Recht (einschließlich Wahlprüfung, Immunität und Geschäftsordnung sowie 1990–1994 Petitionen) Norbert Geis (CSU) 2. Inneres und Sport Johannes Gerster (CDU) (bis 21.1.1992) Erwin Marschewski (CDU) (ab 21.1.1992) 3. Wirtschaft Matthias Wissmann (CDU) (bis 9.2.1993) Rainer Haungs (CDU) (ab 9.2.1993) 4. Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten Egon Susset (CDU) 5. Verkehr Dirk Fischer (CDU) 6. Post und Telekommunikation Gerhard O. Pfeffermann (CDU) (bis 6.9.1993) Elmar Müller (CDU) (ab 21.9.1993) 7. Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau Dietmar Kansy (CDU) 8. Finanzen Kurt Falthauser (CSU) (bis 9.2.1993) Hansgeorg Hauser (CSU) (ab 9.2.1993) 9. Haushalt Jochen Borchert (CDU) (bis 21.1.1993) Adolf Roth (CDU) (ab 9.2.1993) 10. Arbeit und Soziales Julius Louven (CDU) 11. Gesundheit Paul Hoffacker (CDU) Seite 1 von 34 DHB Kapitel 5.8 Arbeitskreise und Arbeitsgruppen 29.05.2020 Vorsitzende der Arbeitsgruppen Wahl- (in der Regel zugleich Sprecher der Fraktionen für die einzelnen Fachgebiete) der periode CDU/CSU 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq
    Review of International Studies (2007), 33, 285–305 Copyright British International Studies Association doi:10.1017/S0260210507007516 Security communities and the habitus of restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq CORNELIU BJOLA AND MARKUS KORNPROBST* Abstract. Borrowing from Norbert Elias, we introduce the habitus of restraint to the study of security communities. This habitus constitutes a key dimension of the glue that holds security communities together. The perceived compatibility of practices emanating from the habitus that members hold fosters the collective identity upon which a security community is built. The violation of a member’s habitus by the practices of another member, however, disrupts the reproduction of collective identity and triggers a crisis of the security community. Our analysis of Germany’s reaction to Washington’s case for war against Iraq provides empirical evidence for the salience of the habitus for the internal dynamics of security communities. Introduction At first glance, it is surprising that Saddam Hussein triggered the deepest post-World War II rift in the usually amicable relationship between the United States and Germany. The two countries share many values that should have prevented action taken against a vicious dictator from becoming a contentious issue. Saddam Hussein’s longstanding record of gross human rights abuses and aggression against other states should have been yet another reason to draw the two allies even closer together. This scenario, however, failed to materialise. Not only did the United States and Germany fail to find a common ground on Iraq. They even started to fundamentally question the nature of their relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    A Column By Len Johnson TABLE OF CONTENTS TOM KELLY................................................................................................5 A RELAY BIG SHOW ..................................................................................8 IS THIS THE COMMONWEALTH GAMES FINEST MOMENT? .................11 HALF A GLASS TO FILL ..........................................................................14 TOMMY A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS ........................................................17 NO LIGHTNING BOLT, JUST A WARM SURPRISE ................................. 20 A BEAUTIFUL SET OF NUMBERS ...........................................................23 CLASSIC DISTANCE CONTESTS FOR GLASGOW ...................................26 RISELEY FINALLY GETS HIS RECORD ...................................................29 TRIALS AND VERDICTS ..........................................................................32 KIRANI JAMES FIRST FOR GRENADA ....................................................35 DEEK STILL WEARS AN INDELIBLE STAMP ..........................................38 MICHAEL, ELOISE DO IT THEIR WAY .................................................... 40 20 SECONDS OF BOLT BEATS 20 MINUTES SUNSHINE ........................43 ROWE EQUAL TO DOUBELL, NOT DOUBELL’S EQUAL ..........................46 MOROCCO BOUND ..................................................................................49 ASBEL KIPROP ........................................................................................52 JENNY SIMPSON .....................................................................................55
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht 2009 – 2011 (PDF)
    GESCHÄFTSBERICHT DER FREIEN DEMOKRATISCHEN PARTEI 2009 – 2011 www.fdp.de VORWORT GESCHÄFTSBERICHT Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Parteifreundinnen, liebe Parteifreunde, WIR sind für Sie da. Rund 250 Tage im Jahr stehen die Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter der Bundesgeschäftsstelle Ihnen für Ihre Fragen, Probleme und Anregungen zur Verfügung: Täglich von 8 Uhr morgens bis 8 Uhr abends. Der Auftrag des vorangegangenen Bundesparteitages in Köln (24. April bis 25. April 2010) an den neuen Generalsekretär Christian Lindner, bis zum Bundes- parteitag 2012 ein neues Grundsatzprogramm zu erstellen, stellt auch an Ihre Bundesgeschäftsstelle erhebliche Anforderungen. Dazu kommt, dass auch von der Bundesgeschäftsstelle erwartet wird, die Arbeit der FDP-geführten Ministerien zu begleiten. Wir sind für Sie da, auch in der Programmdiskussion. Und deshalb haben wir in der Bundesgeschäftsstelle im Juni des letzten Jahres eine neue Abteilung instal- liert: die Abteilung Politische Planung, Programm und Analyse (PPA). Diese Abteilung verantwortet in erster Linie die inhaltliche Begleitung der Erarbeitung des neuen Grundsatzprogramms, betreut die Programm- kommission und die 11 eingerichteten Programmfo- ren. Auch in der Abteilung Dialog und Kampagnen wird das Motto „Wir sind für Sie da“ groß geschrieben. Neben Wir möchten in eine breite Diskussion des Grund- der Erarbeitung von Argumenten und Flugblättern zu satzprogramms in den Gliederungen vor Ort, mit den aktuellen politischen Themen steht die Planung von Landes- und Bundesfachausschüssen aber auch mit Kampagnen ebenso wie der Bürgerdialog, insbeson- der gesamten Bevölkerung eintreten. Dazu halten die dere auch via Internet, im Mittelpunkt der 9-köpfigen fünf Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter dieser Abteilung Abteilung. Allein seit September 2009 wurden durch eine Vielzahl von Anregungen für Veranstaltungen vor diese Abteilung ca.
    [Show full text]
  • ALUMNI NEWS Thel Cornell
    ft ALUMNI NEWS thel Cornell Are You Coming Bach For Reunions? If you are, we really have some- thing to show you this year! Just stop in at Barnes Hall and don't let outside appearances fool you. Barnes Hall is an old building, no one else has Brooks Brothers famous but when you open the doors, COOL, LIGHTWEIGHT, COMFORTABLE you will step into a new world— SUMMER SUITS AND ODD JACKETS a college store in the modern 1954 manner. made for us in our own styles Of course we are making great Starting with our new washable Orlon*-and- plans for Reunion Week. Now nylon suits that launder easily, require no press- we have lots of room to display our wares and you will have lots ing ... our attractive crease-resistant suits of linen of room to browse around in air- or other fibers blended with Dacron*... and our conditioned comfort. traditional cotton cords... we have a host of cool, We are planning for our regular comfortable Summer clothing, all made for us in booth in Barton Hall too and will our own distinctive styles. have a fine display of Cornell items, both old and new. But be sure not to miss the new store. Suitsy from $26.50 Odd Jacketsy from $ 16 We'll be looking for those who Swatches, descriptions and order form sent upon request can't get back this June at some *DuPont's fiber future date. Also, we are plan- ning a small catalog of our most ESTABLISHED 1818 popular items which we hope to have ready next fall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Osthandel: West German-Soviet Trade and the End of the Cold War, 1969-1991
    The Importance of Osthandel: West German-Soviet Trade and the End of the Cold War, 1969-1991 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Charles William Carter, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Professor Carole Fink, Advisor Professor Mansel Blackford Professor Peter Hahn Copyright by Charles William Carter 2012 Abstract Although the 1970s was the era of U.S.-Soviet détente, the decade also saw West Germany implement its own form of détente: Ostpolitik. Trade with the Soviet Union (Osthandel) was a major feature of Ostpolitik. Osthandel, whose main feature was the development of the Soviet energy-export infrastructure, was part of a broader West German effort aimed at promoting intimate interaction with the Soviets in order to reduce tension and resolve outstanding Cold War issues. Thanks to Osthandel, West Germany became the USSR’s most important capitalist trading partner, and several oil and natural gas pipelines came into existence because of the work of such firms as Mannesmann and Thyssen. At the same time, Moscow’s growing emphasis on developing energy for exports was not a prudent move. A lack of economic diversification resulted, a development that helped devastate the USSR’s economy after the oil price collapse of 1986 and, in the process, destabilize the communist bloc. Against this backdrop, the goals of some West German Ostpolitik advocates—especially German reunification and a peaceful resolution to the Cold War—occurred. ii Dedication Dedicated to my father, Charles William Carter iii Acknowledgements This project has been several years in the making, and many individuals have contributed to its completion.
    [Show full text]
  • CDU) SOZIALORDNUNG: Dr
    g Z 8398 C 'nformationsdienst der Christlich Demokratischen Union Deutschlands Union in Deutschland Bonn, den 7. Oktober 1982 Für die Wir packen Auftakt-Aktion Bundeskanzler es an Helmut Kohl liegen jetzt sämtliche Materia- Als Helmut Kohl vor zehn Tagen zum Bundes- lien vor. Ausführliche Vorstel- lung mit Abbildungen und Be- kanzler gewählt wurde, sagte er: „Packen wir es stellformular im rosa Teil. gemeinsam an." Dieses Wort gilt. Die Re- Von dem am 1. Oktober 1982 gierung unter seiner Führung hat angepackt. aktuell herausgegebenen „Zur D'e Bürger im Land spüren dies, sie atmen Sache"-Flugblatt zur Wahl Hel- *uf, daß die Zeit der Führungslosigkeit, des mut Kohls wurden am Wo- Tr chenende bereits über 3 Mil- eibenlassens und der Resignation zu Ende lionen Exemplare verteilt. 9eht. Auch die Beziehungen zu unseren Freun- • den im Ausland hat Helmut Kohl mit seinen er- sten Reisen nach Paris und Brüssel gefestigt Das traurige Erbe und gestärkt. Dokumentation über die Hin- terlassenschaft der Regierung Der Bundeskanzler und alle, die ihm helfen, haben in Schmidt im grünen Teil den letzten Tagen mit einem gewaltigen Arbeitspen- sum ein Beispiel für uns alle dafür gegeben, was jetzt yon uns verlangt wird, um Schritt für Schritt das trau- • HELMUT KOHL r,9e Erbe, das die Schmidt-Regierung hinterlassen Wir müssen den Leistungswillen nat, zu überwinden. Die häßliche Hetzkampagne zahl- in unserem Volke wieder beleben Seite 3 reicher Sozialdemokraten gegen diesen Neuanfang 2ßigt ihre Ohnmacht und ihr schlechtes Gewissen; s'e sind schlechte Verlierer und schlechte Demokra- • BUNDESTAGS- ten, und sie werden dafür am 6. März die Quittung er- FRAKTION halten.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Deutscher Teilnehmer Bilderberg
    • Egon Bahr (1968, 1971, 1982, 1987), German Minister, creator of the Ostpolitik • Rainer Barzel (1966), former German opposition leader • Kurt Biedenkopf (1992), former Prime Minister of Saxony • Max Brauer (1954, 1955, 1958, 1963, 1964, 1966), former Mayor of Hamburg • Birgit Breuel (1973, 1979, 1980, 1991, 1992, 1994), chairwoman of Treuhandanstalt • Andreas von Bülow (1978), former Minister of Research of Germany • Karl Carstens (1971), former President of Germany • Klaus von Dohnanyi (1975, 1977), former Mayor of Hamburg • Ursula Engelen-Kefer (1998), former chairwoman of the German Confederation of Trade Unions • Björn Engholm (1991), former Prime Minister of Schleswig-Holstein • Ludwig Erhard (1966), former Chancellor of Germany • Fritz Erler (1955, 1957, 1958, 1963, 1964, 1966), Socialist Member of Parliament • Joschka Fischer (2008), former Minister of Foreign Affairs (Germany) • Herbert Giersch (1975), Director, Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel • Helmut Haussmann (1979, 1980, 1990, 1996), former Minister of Economics of Germany • Wolfgang Ischinger (1998, 2002, 2008), former German Ambassador to Washington • Helmut Kohl (1980, 1982, 1988), former Chancellor of Germany • Walter Leisler Kiep (1974, 1975, 1977, 1980), former Treasurer of the Christian Democratic Union (Germany) • Kurt Georg Kiesinger (1955, 1957, 1966), former Chancellor of Germany • Hans Klein (1986), Member of German Bundestag • Otto Graf Lambsdorff (1980, 1983, 1984), former Minister of Economics of Germany • Karl Lamers (1995), Member of the
    [Show full text]
  • Constructivism in International Relations the Politics of Reality
    Constructivism in International Relations The politics of reality Maja Zehfuss University of Warwick 25579CCB 42:58 84 ,2:581:B:C.2:/2CBD4CCC9 ,2:58,CB7DB22:22CCambridge Books9CCB Online 42:58© Cambridge 84CB University 9CCB5: Press, 8 2009 ,0 PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org© Maja Zehfuss 2004 First published in printed format 2002 ISBN 978-0-511-49179-5 OCeISBN ISBN 0-521-81544-4 hardback ISBN 0-521-89466-2 paperback 25579CCB 42:58 84 ,2:581:B:C.2:/2CBD4CCC9 ,2:58,CB7DB22:22CCambridge Books9CCB Online 42:58© Cambridge 84CB University 9CCB5: Press, 8 2009 ,0 Constructivism in International Relations Maja Zehfuss’ book offers a fundamental critique of constructivism, fo- cusing on the work of Wendt, Onuf and Kratochwil. Using Germany’s shift towards participation in international military operations as an illustration, she demonstrates why each version of constructivism fails in its own project and comes apart on the basis of its own assump- tions. Inspired by Derridean thought, this book highlights the political consequences of constructivist representations of reality. Each critique concludes that constructivist notions of key concepts are impossible, and that this is not merely a question of theoretical inconsistency, but of politics. The book is premised on the notion that the ‘empirical’ and the ‘theoretical’ are less separate than is acknowledged in inter- national relations, and must be read as intertwined.
    [Show full text]