Alitalia – Etihad Transaction Presentation at Luiss University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alitalia – Etihad Transaction Presentation at Luiss University Presentation at Luiss University 1 December 2014 Alitalia – Etihad Transaction Case Study Alitalia (AZ) Summary Overview The Birth of the “New” Alitalia Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana (“CAI” or the “Company”) is a private company that started its operations in January 2009 The Company currently flies to 103 destinations, of which 26 in Italy and 77 for the rest of the world, 186 routes and more than 4,700 weekly flights. In 2013: – Carried 23 million passengers – Generated €3.4 billion revenues One of the youngest fleets in the world with an average age of 6.5 years Alitalia is a member of the SkyTeam global alliance and, since 2010, forms part with Air France-KLM and Delta Air Lines of the main air transport Transatlantic Joint Venture The Hub The Fleet The Crew Fiumicino Airport Source: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 1 Alitalia: A Long Story of Difficulties Since 2000 Alitalia has cumulated negative results in excess of ca.€9.0bn, including ca.€3.0bn of liquidation costs related to Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane. Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana Net Income Evolution (€m) Net Income Evolution (€m) 93 (69) (168) (168) (256) (280) (327) (512) (495) (569) (626) (844) (907) (1,000)(1) 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008E 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A Cumulated Net Income (€m) Cumulated Net Income (€m) (256) (327) (494) (1,163) (1,070) (1,582) (563) (843) (2,426) (2,594) (1,411) (3,220) (3,715) (4,715) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008E In the period 2000 – 2008E, Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane In the period 2009 – 2013, Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana posted a cumulated net loss of ca.€4.7bn posted a cumulated net loss of ca.€1.4bn According to Italian press news, the estimated liquidation cost amounted to ca.€3.0bn(2) Sources: Alitalia annual reports. Note: (1) As estimated in the report “Alitalia – La privatizzazione infinita”; financial accounts FY2008 not available since on September 2008 Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane was declared insolvent and subject to a special bankruptcy procedure termed extraordinary administration (“amministrazione straordinaria”). (2) Average of two Italian press news, namely “Ecco chi ha pagato il conto. Salvataggio da 3,2 miliardi” (Corriere della Sera, 8 August 2013) and 2 “Quanto costa chiudere Alitalia. In totale lo Stato pagherebbe direttamente circa 2,9 miliardi” (lavoce.info, 16 September 2008). Alitalia: History Overview Established as State-owned company, Alitalia grew in the early decades up to face the first difficulties following the deregulations of the sector and the higher competition in the domestic market 2000: Following the 2003-2004: Proposed a 1946: 1957: Malpensa failure to new business plan Incorporation of Alitalia merged 1970-1990: All 2000-2003: become an (Alitalia daily lost €1m). 2007: AF – KLM Alitalia with LAI and airlines except Global drop in air international hub(1), Italian State provided a selected as Aereolinee became Alitalia Alitalia developed traffic. Strategic KLM decided not to €400m bridge financing potential Italiane Linee Aeree industrial plans to refocus on proceed the alliance and disposed a 12.3% candidate to take Internazionali Italiane face the oil crisis domestic hauls with AZ(2) stake(3) over Alitalia 2001: Alitalia entered End of 2006: 1968: Awarded as 7th 1996: Italian state 2003: Business plan 1950: Alitalia SkyTeam, joining Air airline globally and 3rd disposed 21% proposal for Government failure in acquired Lati and France, Delta Air in Europe, and stake to employees recapitalization and selling a 39.9% stake in started serving also Lines, Korean Air, became the first and listed a 15% disposal of the stake Alitalia, with all the 11 LatAm (4) Aeromexico and CSA European airline to stake held by the Government potential buyers Czech Airlines have an all-jet fleet withdrawing their bids 1946 – 1970 1970 – 1990 1990 – 2000 2000 – 2006 2007 Second and third Deregulation / Attempts to relaunch the business through several Early stage growth First privatisation privatisation attempts Oil Crisis industrial plans (failed) Source: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. Notes: (1) Scarcity of connections (rails sand highways) to the city of Milan and other main cities located in the Northern part of Italy. (2) Namely Fiumicino, Linate, Malpensa. (3) Italian State remained with a 49.7% stake. (4) Italian State remained with a 64% stake. 3 Alitalia: Recent Developments Over the 2008–2013 period, the new Alitalia lived a tough economical situation due to both internal and external factors AF-KLM’s offer was rejected due to the lack of agreement with unions/government on 1.6k layoffs Jul-13: Dec-13: Dec-09: Mar-12: Feb-13: Presentation Poste invested May-08: Dec-08: Codeshare Andrea Ragnetti Resignation of the €75m in AF-KLM CAI bought key agreement appointed of the CEO Industrial Plan a €300m CEO replacing proposed assets of AZ between Alitalia Andrea Ragnetti 2013–2016 capital increase merger with AZ for €1bn and Etihad Rocco Sabelli Nov-13: Aug-08: Jan-09: Jan-12: Feb-13: Apr-13: Approval of Creation of AF-KLM bought Negotiations Convertible Gabriele the Industrial CAI, investor a 25% stake in with Blue bond issuance Del Torchio Plan revision consortium led new AZ for Panorama and for €150m appointed CEO by R. Colaninno €0.3bn Wind Jet Both transactions failed in 2H12 Source: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 4 Alitalia Key Figures From 2009 to 2013 Alitalia reported losses that made the Net Equity shrink and the Net Debt increase to more than €900m. These negative results have been driven by lower traffic and high rents. Revenues (€m) Net Equity (€m) Growing top line – +5% CAGR Cumulated capital erosion 723 3,478 3,594 548 3,225 3,406 479 2,827 201 (27) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A EBITDAR (€m) and EBITDAR Margin (%) Net Debt (€m) and Net Debt / EBITDA (x) Declining marginality Debt expansion 448 1,029 398 936 334 847 839 854 244 9.5x 13% 114 10% 11% 6.7x 7% (1) (1) 4% n.m. 3.8x n.m. 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A Net Income (€m) Passengers (m) and Market Share (%) Negative return Volatile PAX carried 23.9% 23.8% 23.6% 22.6% (69) 21.7% (168) (280) 24.6 (327) 23.4 23.8 22.7 21.8 (569) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A Sources: Alitalia annual reports. Note: (1) 2009A and 2013A EBITDA equals to (€54m) and (€138m), respectively. 5 Etihad (EY) Summary Overview The Birth of the “New” Alitalia Etihad Airways began its operations in 2003 From its Abu Dhabi hub Etihad flies to ca. 110 passenger and cargo destinations in the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Americas. In 2013: – Carried 11.5 million passengers – Generated ca. €4.6 billion revenues The airline has a fleet of 102 Airbus and Boeing aircraft, and more than 210 aircraft on firm order Holds equity investments in a number of European and Asian Airlines The Hub The Fleet The Crew Abu Dhabi International Airport Source: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 6 Snapshot on Alitalia and Etihad: Side by Side done Despite a smaller workforce and fleet, Etihad has been able to achieve ca.€4.6bn revenue covering more destination than Alitalia. FLEET FLEET 137 102 Fleet Age Average 86 6.5 Fleet Age Average 28 Mid-range years 4.9 Mid-range years 22 64 Long-range Long-range REVENUES REVENUES 4,573 € million 20 3,406 10 Regional € million Cargo airplanes 9 206 aircraft Air One to be Smart Carrier delivered EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES by 2015 (of which 52% 14,000 7,900 long-range DESTINATIONS DESTINATIONS and 47% 103 96 mid-range) Sources: 2013 annual reports, Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 7 Etihad: the Right Partner 40% stake 49% stake 10.5% stake 24% stake 3% stake Minority Stake Acquisition Complementarity with AZ Proven M&A Track Record Selected Recent Awards Airline Market Leadership ‘14 M. East’s Leading Airline ‘14 Best Economy Class ‘14 World’s Leading Airline ‘13 Airline of the Year ’13 World Leading First Class ‘13 Solid and Supportive Shareholders Expected High Growth 1st Class Service Provider Sources: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 8 Key Stakeholders done Lending Banks Customers Largest Shareholders European Airlines Suppliers Public Stakeholders and Unions Sources: News articles. 9 Transaction Overview done On 8 August 2014, Etihad acquired a 49% stake in Alitalia. The transaction also envisaged a capital commitment by existing and new shareholders, debt restructuring and new financing, resulting in a ca. €1.8 billion total transaction value. Heathrow Slots The Process in Pics €60m The total announced Equity €1,758m investment amounts to ca. €300m Purchase 75% €1.8bn and comprises the €388m AZ Loyalty following: €598m €113m – Etihad’s investment of €560m through a Negotiation with Unions combination of equity €300m injections, asset €75m purchases and other 1,458 €560m €225m funding arrangements 860 – Existing and new core 785 560 560 shareholders contribution with a capital increase of up to Etihad Equity Quasi- Capital Debt New Transaction Press Conference €300m (€225m in Investment equity Increase Restructuring Loan Value equity and €75m in quasi-equity) – Current lending institutions restructured Parties Involved up to €598m and also New Partner Shareholders Lending Banks committed to provide new loan facilities for % of Total Transaction Value Signing
Recommended publications
  • WORLD AVIATION Yearbook 2013 EUROPE
    WORLD AVIATION Yearbook 2013 EUROPE 1 PROFILES W ESTERN EUROPE TOP 10 AIRLINES SOURCE: CAPA - CENTRE FOR AVIATION AND INNOVATA | WEEK startinG 31-MAR-2013 R ANKING CARRIER NAME SEATS Lufthansa 1 Lufthansa 1,739,886 Ryanair 2 Ryanair 1,604,799 Air France 3 Air France 1,329,819 easyJet Britis 4 easyJet 1,200,528 Airways 5 British Airways 1,025,222 SAS 6 SAS 703,817 airberlin KLM Royal 7 airberlin 609,008 Dutch Airlines 8 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 571,584 Iberia 9 Iberia 534,125 Other Western 10 Norwegian Air Shuttle 494,828 W ESTERN EUROPE TOP 10 AIRPORTS SOURCE: CAPA - CENTRE FOR AVIATION AND INNOVATA | WEEK startinG 31-MAR-2013 Europe R ANKING CARRIER NAME SEATS 1 London Heathrow Airport 1,774,606 2 Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport 1,421,231 Outlook 3 Frankfurt Airport 1,394,143 4 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol 1,052,624 5 Madrid Barajas Airport 1,016,791 HE EUROPEAN AIRLINE MARKET 6 Munich Airport 1,007,000 HAS A NUMBER OF DIVIDING LINES. 7 Rome Fiumicino Airport 812,178 There is little growth on routes within the 8 Barcelona El Prat Airport 768,004 continent, but steady growth on long-haul. MostT of the growth within Europe goes to low-cost 9 Paris Orly Field 683,097 carriers, while the major legacy groups restructure 10 London Gatwick Airport 622,909 their short/medium-haul activities. The big Western countries see little or negative traffic growth, while the East enjoys a growth spurt ... ... On the other hand, the big Western airline groups continue to lead consolidation, while many in the East struggle to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Seduta Di Martedì 24 Ottobre 1989
    SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 257 14 SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 PRESIDENZA DEL PRESIDENTE DELLA IX COMMISSIONE DELLA CAMERA ANTONIO TESTA SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 259 La seduta comimcia alle 15,45. tenzione degli impianti visivi relativi alla navigazione aerea. (Le Commissioni approvano il processo Nella relazione abbiamo cercato di verbale della seduta precedente). dare un quadro sintetico della situazione concernente la gestione portuale. Il primo dato che emerge è che nel nostro paese Audizione dei rappresentanti dell'Assaero- esistono aeroporti gestiti in forma totale porti e della GESAP. ed altri in cui i gestori aeroportuali hanno solo la responsabilità dei servizi, PRESIDENTE. L'ordine del giorno ma non della gestione complessiva. Si reca il seguito dell'indagine conoscitiva tratta di un primo problema che segna• sulla sicurezza del volo. Nella seduta liamo alla vostra attenzione. In prospet• odierna sono previste le audizioni dei tiva sarebbe di aiuto al miglioramento rappresentanti dell'Assaeroporti e della del sistema complessivo una chiara iden• GESAP, dell'Alisarda, delle compagnie di tificazione, anche in termini di responsa• terzo livello, del presidente dell'Aeroclub bilità, di chi deve gestire l'aeroporto e di d'Italia, dell'ANIGAM e delle associazioni chi deve, invece, svolgere un'azione di co• dei consumatori. ordinamento ed effettuare un'opera di in• Nell'ambito dell'audizione dei rappre• dirizzo e di controllo, anche in relazione sentanti dell'Assaeroporti e della Gesap, ai piani nazionali. partecipano alla seduta odierna il dottor Attualmente, sono solo otto gli aero• Domenico Cempella, l'ingegner Francesco porti a gestione totale, nei quali cioè il Di Martino, l'ingegner Giuseppe Maritano, gestore ha la responsabilità del funziona• il comandante Agostino Ferrari e il dottor mento complessivo dello scalo.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Instruments for Reducing Aircraft Noise Theoretical Framework
    European LCCs going hybrid: An empirical survey Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert and Richard Klophaus Worms University of Applied Sciences, Germany Competence Center Aviation Management (CCAM) Airneth Annual Conference The Hague, April 14, 2011 Agenda • Motivation/Background • Textbook definition of pure/archetypical LCC • Data for empirical survey • Empirical results: Classification of airline’s business models • Conclusions/discussion Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid – The Hague, April 14, 2011 2 Motivation / Background • Significant (and still growing) market share of LCCs in Europe. • Obviously different strategies within the LCC segment. • Market observers see trends towards “hybridization” and/or “converging business models”,e.g.: “On many fronts - pricing, product offering, distribution, fleet, network design and even cost structure - the previously obvious and often blatant differences between budget and legacy carriers are now no longer so apparent. This has resulted from the movement of both parties in the same direction, toward the mainstream middle.” Airline Business, May 2009 (emphasis added). Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 3 Motivation / Background • Dynamic market environment with recent changes, e.g. some LCCs offering transfer flights or can be booked via GDS. • Yet, very limited empirical analysis of “hybridization”. Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 4 Aim of the paper It is examined • to what extent carriers today blend low-cost characteristics with the business characteristics of traditional full-service airlines, and • which characteristics remain distinct between LCCs and traditional full-service airlines and which tend to be common for all carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth Session of the Statistics Division
    STA/10-WP/6 International Civil Aviation Organization 2/10/09 WORKING PAPER TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION Montréal, 23 to 27 November 2009 Agenda Item 1: Civil aviation statistics — ICAO classification and definition REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS OF DOMESTIC AND CABOTAGE AIR SERVICES (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY Currently, ICAO uses two different definitions to identify the traffic of domestic flight sectors of international flights; one used by the Statistics Programme, based on the nature of a flight stage, and the other, used for the economic studies on air transport, based on the origin and final destination of a flight (with one or more flight stages). Both definitions have their shortcomings and may affect traffic forecasts produced by ICAO for domestic operations. A similar situation arises with the current inclusion of cabotage services under international operations. After reviewing these issues, the Fourteenth Meeting of the Statistics Panel (STAP/14) agreed to recommend that no changes be made to the current definitions and instructions. Action by the division is in paragraph 5. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In its activities in the field of air transport economics and statistics, ICAO is currently using two different definitions to identify the domestic services of an air carrier. The first one used by the Statistics Programme has been reaffirmed and clarified during Ninth Meeting of the Statistics Division (STA/9) and it is the one currently shown in the Air Transport Reporting Forms. The second one is being used by the Secretariat in the studies on international airline operating economics which have been carried out since 1976 and in pursuance of Assembly Resolution A36-15, Appendix G (reproduced in Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography AIR FRANCE Carlier, c., ed. 'La construction aeronautique, Ie transport aenen, a I'aube du XXIeme siecle'. Centre d'Histoire de l'Industrie Aeronautique et Spatiale, Uni­ versity of Paris I, 1989. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Histoire de I'aviation civile'. Vincennes, Comite Latecoere and Service Historique de l'Annee de l'Air, 1994. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Airbus, un succes industriel europeen'. Paris, Institut d'Histoire de l'Industrie, 1995. Chadeau, E. 'Le reve et la puissance, I'avion et son siecle'. Paris, Fayard, 1996. Dacharry, M. 'Geographie du transport aerien'. Paris, LITEC, 1981. Esperou, R. 'Histoire d'Air France'. La Guerche, Editions Ouest France, 1986. Funel, P., ed. 'Le transport aerien fran~ais'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1982. Guarino, J-G. 'La politique economique des entreprises de transport aerien, Ie cas Air France, environnement et choix'. Doctoral thesis, Nice University, 1977. Hamelin, P., ed. 'Transports 1993, professions en devenir, enjeux et dereglementation'. Paris, Ecole nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, 1992. Le Due, M., ed. 'Services publics de reseau et Europe'. Paris, Documentation fran­ ~ise, 1995. Maoui, G., Neiertz, N., ed. 'Entre ciel et terre', History of Paris Airports. Paris, Le Cherche Midi, 1995. Marais, J-G. and Simi, R 'Caviation commerciale'. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1964. Merlin, P. 'Geographie, economie et planification des transports'. Paris, Presses uni- versitaires de France, 1991. Merlin, P. 'Les transports en France'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1994. Naveau, J. 'CEurope et Ie transport aerien'. Brussels, Bruylant, 1983. Neiertz, N. 'La coordination des transports en France de 1918 a nos jours'. Unpub­ lished doctoral thesis, Paris IV- Sorbonne University, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Marzo 2018
    Periodico del master in giornalismo dell’Università IULM - Anno 5 - Numero 5 - 16 Marzo 2018 Il decollo di Malpensa Air Italy, la nuova compagnia dei cieli italiani, punta tutto sul rilancio dell'aeroporto milanese 2 SOMMARIO MILANO MOBILITÀ Air Italy, «Saremo leader dei cieli italiani» 3 di Giulia Galliano Sacchetto e Alice Scaglioni POLITICA Milano, PD primo partito. I perché del voto 9 di Luca Palladino e Alessandro Vinci CULTURA Tempo di Libri, Francesco Piccolo conquista Milano 1813 di Beatrice Barbato SANITÀ Buongiorno Dottoressa, la clinica per donne 1819 di Enrica Iacono QUINDI... QUANDO? 23 a cura di Alessandro Follis e Nausica Samela THAT'S MILANO 25 a cura di Chiara Colangelo e Giulia Diamanti 16 MARZO 2018 3 MOBILITÀ Air Italy, «Saremo leader dei cieli italiani» Nata dalle ceneri di Meridiana, si pone l'obiettivo di diventare compagnia di riferimento per il mercato italiano, facendo di Malpensa un vero hub. di GIULIA GALLIANO SACCHETTO e ALICE SCAGLIONI 16 MARZO 2018 4 MOBILITÀ l 2018 ha portato con sé una grande novità sui cieli italiani, e forse l’hub di Milano Malpensa non sarà più un’illusione seguita da malinconiche smentite. La nascita della nuova compagnia di volo italiana, Air Italy, sorta dalle ceneri del- Ila precedente Meridiana, e grazie agli investimenti di Qatar Airways, apre uno spiraglio nel discorso degli aeroporti ita- liani, e nell’eterna lotta tra Fiumicino e Malpensa. Air Italy ha SLOGAN visto la luce come innovativa fase di sviluppo e di crescita della La nuova compagnia di volo compagnia privata Meridiana, originariamente fondata con il italiana, Air Italy, nata per rilanciare ex-Meridiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Ala Littoria
    The Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the South East European Air Mail Connection to North America, 1939‐1941 Ratomir Zivkovic [email protected] I. Introduction • On September 3rd, 1939, France and Great Britain entered into the war with Germany. • PANAM changed the terminal point on its Southern Route from Marseille to Lisbon, Portugal, ( Foreign Air Mail Contract No. 18), on September 6th, 1939. • Ala Littoria service from Lisbon to Rome, so‐called “Route of the 45th parallel,” became major air mail route for the mail between continental Europe, Turkey and North America . II. The development of International Air Mail in the Kingdom of S.H.S. (Kraljevina S.H.S.), later Kingdom of Yugoslavia (Kraljevina Yugoslavia) A. Belgrade on the first transcontinental air route from Paris to Istanbul • Our Wings Club (Klub Naša krila) was formed December 1, 1918. • In March of 1923, Yugoslav government awarded a concession and signed an agreement on air carriage with the French company C.F.R.N.A. (Compagnie Franco‐Roumaine de la Navigation Aérienne). • Contracts were renewed with C.I.D.N.A. (Compagnie Internationale de la Navigation Aérienne) in 1926 and with Air France, successor of C.F.R.N.A. and C.I.D.N.A., in 1933. • Until 1927, mail was shipped by air only to the cities on the C.F.R.N.A. /C.I.D.N.A route. • On March 27th, 1927, a new Belgrade airport was opened in Zemun replacing the temporary Pančevo airport C.F.R.N.A./ C.I.D.N.A service: Paris, Strasbourg, Nuremberg, Prague, Warsaw, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest, Istanbul • First flight out of Belgrade (Pančevo Airport) to Paris was on April 16, 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • Identificazione E Affidabilità Delle Aerolinee Nell'odierno
    Identificazione e affidabilità delle aerolinee nell’odierno scenario del trasporto aereo Stante la difficoltà di “conoscere” l’aerolinea con cui si volerà, può almeno l’utente avere la certezza che le autorità preposte abbiano svolto idonea opera di vaglio e controllo? Uno dei principali problemi con cui oggi si deve confrontare l’utente del trasporto aereo è indubbiamente costituito dall’identità del vettore che si prenderà carico di trasportarlo alla sua destinazione. Una volta, fino a qualche anno fa, questo problema davvero non esisteva. In Italia in particolare, chi decideva di volare sapeva abbastanza di Alitalia, Itavia, Meridiana per poter prendere con cognizione di causa la sua decisione; parlare di scelta del vettore sarebbe errato, in quanto i collegamenti che questi operatori esercitavano raramente erano in sovrapposizione e come tali in concorrenza fra loro. Ma oggi il problema è molto peggiorato e usando questi termini non necessariamente intendiamo far riferimento all’aspetto della safety, che pure ha la sua valenza, quanto all’altro argomento assai più elementare di conoscere, nel senso di aver almeno sentito parlare del vettore che ci porterà a destinazione. L’esempio più eclatante di quanto stiamo dicendo è dato dal recente caso della Flash Air e dell’incidente di Sharm El Sheikh. Non fraintendiamo: abbiamo già scritto e ripetiamo anche in questa occasione, che fintanto che la commissione di inchiesta non conclude la sua indagine è assolutamente sbagliato –come purtroppo è accaduto- sparare a zero a priori contro la compagnia aerea. Il discorso vale per questo come per ogni altro malaugurato incidente che si dovesse verificare.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Freight Transport a Strategic Modelling Approach on a Global Scale
    Air freight transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale GEORGIOS TZIMOURTOS Master Thesis May 2015 Air freight Transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale By Georgios Tzimourtos Student number: 4185269 E-mail: [email protected] in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics at the Delft University of Technology, Thesis committee: Prof.dr.ir. L.A. Tavasszy – TLO/TPM Dr. Ron van Duin (J.H.R.) – TLO/TPM Dr. Milan Janic – CiTG Dr. B.F. (Bruno) Santos – ATO/L&R An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover photo credits: Deutsche Lufthansa AG Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Problem statement ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Research question and objectives ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope of this research ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Approach and research methods ........................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Thesis structure ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Italy's Forgotten Airlines
    OLITICAL observers of the time often When Italy entered the war, the capacity of commented that Benito Mussolini was ALI and ALSA became largely directed towards somewhat distrustful of Hitler in the military campaigns in the Balkans and Greece. immediate pre-war period, to the extent Back in April 1939 ALSA’s four examples of the P of constructing an 1,851km (1,150-mile) Breda Ba 44 — a much-modified licence-built de series of fortifications, known as the Vallo Alpino Havilland Dragon Rapide — used on domestic (Alpine Wall), across Italy’s northern frontier. Albanian services, had been sequestered by Nevertheless, having watched events turn the military for operations surrounding Italy’s towards Germany’s favour during 1938–39, occupation of the territory. One unusual addition Mussolini threw in his lot with Germany and on to ALSA’s wartime fleet was Douglas DC-3 June 10, 1940, took Italy to war against the Allies. I-EMOS, which operated the Rome—Tirana At the beginning of September that year Italy’s service before being exchanged with Germany airlines were mobilised as part of Comando Servizi for various types. Formerly operated by Belgian Aerei Speciali (CSAS) under General Aurelio national airline Sabena as OO-AUH, it had been Liotta, with Avio Linee Italiane (ALI), Ala Littoria interned by the Vichy authorities at Oran in SA (ALSA) and Linee Aeree Trancontinentali Italiane Algeria while attempting to reach the Belgian (LATI) organised into the Nucleo Communicazione Congo, and was subsequently handed over to the DAVID H. STRINGER COLLECTION x 2 (Communications Group) and their crews trans- Regia Aeronautica.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan American Airways LATI Substitute Service 1942 Mail Handling and Interception January to July
    Pan American Airways LATI substitute service 1942 Mail handling and interception January to July. The Italian ‘LATI’ airline carrying Axis unexamined mail, strategic materials and enemy agents between Rome and South America was closed down in December 1941 by American pressure on Brazil. A Brazilian condition of this agreement was that the Allies provide an equivalent air mail service to and from Europe. Only Pan American Airways had aircraft capable of carrying substantial loads across the Atlantic, and it was to Pan American that the Allies turned to provide the “LATI substitute” service. An important aspect of this service was that the Allies could now intercept enemy mail that previously had been carried by LATI unexamined. A small British Imperial Censorship team was sent from UK to Bathurst, Gambia, arriving there on 12th February 1942, but by then the first Pan American flights from Natal to Lisbon had taken place, bypassing Bathurst and carrying Axis mail unintercepted in both directions. Only a few of the later flights actually called at Bathurst, and examples of examined mail are difficult to find. In late July 1942 the interception and censorship operation was transferred to San Juan, Puerto Rico and the Bathurst team eventually transferred to Lagos, Nigeria. The exhibit shows examples of the differing mail treatment of intercepted, unintercepted and diverted mail from this short but important period in WW2 aviation postal history. 1) Mail carried from South America to Europe prior to Bathurst censors. 2) Mail from South America to Europe unintercepted. 3) Mail from Europe to South America unintercepted. 4) The alternative route.
    [Show full text]