Air Freight Transport a Strategic Modelling Approach on a Global Scale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air Freight Transport a Strategic Modelling Approach on a Global Scale Air freight transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale GEORGIOS TZIMOURTOS Master Thesis May 2015 Air freight Transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale By Georgios Tzimourtos Student number: 4185269 E-mail: [email protected] in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics at the Delft University of Technology, Thesis committee: Prof.dr.ir. L.A. Tavasszy – TLO/TPM Dr. Ron van Duin (J.H.R.) – TLO/TPM Dr. Milan Janic – CiTG Dr. B.F. (Bruno) Santos – ATO/L&R An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover photo credits: Deutsche Lufthansa AG Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Problem statement ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Research question and objectives ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope of this research ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Approach and research methods ........................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Thesis structure ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Contribution of this research .............................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 2: The Air Freight Industry .............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 A Historical Overview .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 The Business of air freight ................................................................................................................... 8 The Air Cargo Logistics Chain and the Players Involved ........................................................................ 8 Types of Air Freight Carriers and their Business Models .................................................................... 10 2.4 The networks .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 The Fleet............................................................................................................................................ 13 Passenger aircraft ............................................................................................................................... 13 Combi aircraft ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Cargo aircraft, Freighters .................................................................................................................... 14 The aerospace industry players .......................................................................................................... 15 Aircraft loading equipment ................................................................................................................. 30 2.6 The Airports ...................................................................................................................................... 32 2.7 Costs and pricing ............................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 3: Modelling Transport .................................................................................................................. 41 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 41 3.2 Modelling freight transport .............................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Categorization of models .................................................................................................................. 42 3.4 The four step methodology .............................................................................................................. 46 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................... 47 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 51 Modal Split .......................................................................................................................................... 51 Network Assignment ........................................................................................................................... 56 ii 3.5 Modelling for air freight .................................................................................................................... 56 Chapter 4: Synthesis and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 58 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Conceptual framework ..................................................................................................................... 58 4.3 Step 1: Economic inter-activity - Trade flows OD matrix .................................................................. 61 4.4 Step 2: Mode choice (air/sea) ........................................................................................................... 63 4.5 Step 3: Service choice ....................................................................................................................... 70 4.6 Step 4: Route choice ......................................................................................................................... 71 4.7 Step 5: Network assignment and flows ............................................................................................ 76 Chapter 5: Results of the model and validation ......................................................................................... 78 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 78 5.2 Global level........................................................................................................................................ 79 5.3 Regional level: Africa ......................................................................................................................... 90 5.4 Regional level: Asia ........................................................................................................................... 93 5.5 Regional level: Europe ...................................................................................................................... 96 5.6 Regional level: Latin America ............................................................................................................ 99 5.7 Regional level: Middle East ............................................................................................................. 103 5.8 Regional level: North America ........................................................................................................ 105 5.9 Regional level: Oceania ................................................................................................................... 109 5.10 Sensitivity analysis ........................................................................................................................ 112 5.11 Validation of the results ................................................................................................................ 115 Chapter 6: Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................ 119 References ................................................................................................................................................ 121 Appendix A: Model results at an OD level ................................................................................................ 131 Africa ................................................................................................................................................. 131 Asia .................................................................................................................................................... 143 Europe ............................................................................................................................................... 155 Latin America .................................................................................................................................... 167 Middle East ......................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • IEG Final Report Version 8
    Towards a European Strategic Aviation Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation Infrastructure Report of the Independent Expert Group Final Report - April 2013 0 Towards a European Strategic Aviation RDT&E Infrastructure Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Contact: Dietrich Knoerzer – Stanley Tang European Commission Directorate-General for Research & Innovation Directorate H – Transport RTD-H.3 – Aeronautics B-1049 Brussels [email protected] [email protected] 0 Towards a European Strategic Aviation RDT&E Infrastructure Preface Tasked by the European Commission and ACARE Member States Group in September 2012, a group of independent experts (IEG) has produced the following report on a European Strategic Aviation Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Infrastructure (RDT&E) and has submitted it in February 2013. The mandate provided very limited time for the group to deliberate and did not allow the complete perimeter to be addressed in the necessary depth. The IEG therefore decided to make sure it covered areas where short-term advice actions were potentially needed and where its own expertise could contribute. Nevertheless the IEG was also able to review the entire spectrum of aviation RDT&E infrastructure (identifying several additional areas as potential "strategic RDT&E capabilities", ranging from aero-engine testing and ATM, E-infrastructures and large scale demonstrators to production technology capabilities) and to recommend further work on these and other topics that it considered necessary to provide a complete and in depth review in the longer term.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Seduta Di Martedì 24 Ottobre 1989
    SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 257 14 SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 PRESIDENZA DEL PRESIDENTE DELLA IX COMMISSIONE DELLA CAMERA ANTONIO TESTA SEDUTA DI MARTEDÌ 24 OTTOBRE 1989 259 La seduta comimcia alle 15,45. tenzione degli impianti visivi relativi alla navigazione aerea. (Le Commissioni approvano il processo Nella relazione abbiamo cercato di verbale della seduta precedente). dare un quadro sintetico della situazione concernente la gestione portuale. Il primo dato che emerge è che nel nostro paese Audizione dei rappresentanti dell'Assaero- esistono aeroporti gestiti in forma totale porti e della GESAP. ed altri in cui i gestori aeroportuali hanno solo la responsabilità dei servizi, PRESIDENTE. L'ordine del giorno ma non della gestione complessiva. Si reca il seguito dell'indagine conoscitiva tratta di un primo problema che segna• sulla sicurezza del volo. Nella seduta liamo alla vostra attenzione. In prospet• odierna sono previste le audizioni dei tiva sarebbe di aiuto al miglioramento rappresentanti dell'Assaeroporti e della del sistema complessivo una chiara iden• GESAP, dell'Alisarda, delle compagnie di tificazione, anche in termini di responsa• terzo livello, del presidente dell'Aeroclub bilità, di chi deve gestire l'aeroporto e di d'Italia, dell'ANIGAM e delle associazioni chi deve, invece, svolgere un'azione di co• dei consumatori. ordinamento ed effettuare un'opera di in• Nell'ambito dell'audizione dei rappre• dirizzo e di controllo, anche in relazione sentanti dell'Assaeroporti e della Gesap, ai piani nazionali. partecipano alla seduta odierna il dottor Attualmente, sono solo otto gli aero• Domenico Cempella, l'ingegner Francesco porti a gestione totale, nei quali cioè il Di Martino, l'ingegner Giuseppe Maritano, gestore ha la responsabilità del funziona• il comandante Agostino Ferrari e il dottor mento complessivo dello scalo.
    [Show full text]
  • September, 2008
    WWW.AIRCARGOWORLD.COM SEPTEMBER 2008 International Trends & Analysis INTERNATIONAL EDITION The World’s Top Cargo Airlines50 Cargo Security • India • Anti-Trust 2008 SUPPLY CHAIN INNOVATION AWARD FINALIST 6H>6 IDD J#H# EDGII"ID "9DDG# 96NN"9:;>C>I::# ,% A:HH I=6C6>G# As fuel prices send airfreight costs soaring, only OceanGuaranteed ® provides day-definite delivery from Asia to the U.S. that’s just as reliable, but at a fraction of the cost.With the combined resources and expertise of APL Logistics and Con-way Freight, OceanGuaranteed provides a unique single-source LCL/LTL solution with proven 99% on-time performance. In fact, your shipment is guaranteed to arrive on schedule, or we’ll pay 20% of the invoice.* Call 866-896-2005 or visit www.oceanguaranteed.com/22 for more information or to book a shipment today. *Conditions and restrictions apply. See website for full details. Service also available to Canada and Mexico. International Edition September 2008 CONTENTS Volume 11, Number 7 COLUMNS Top Cargo 12 North America Airlines With all the turmoil in Ohio, 22 The annual ranking of the growth at Toledo Express the world’s top 50 cargo air- Airport as a freight center is lines by traffic, with aircraft noteworthy orders and cargo revenue. 14 Pacific Yields on freighters may be down, but handling cargo in China remains a feast • JAL Slimmer 17 Europe Despite its bad timing of entering the market, Cargo 30 India B could be a survivor among India could become a plenty of airline failures key growth market for air 30 cargo, but overcapacity could spoil the party for freight operators.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eu) 2015/ 1014
    27.6.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that Union list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information and the verifications carried out by the Commission, the Union list should now be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Union list.
    [Show full text]
  • Alitalia – Etihad Transaction Presentation at Luiss University
    Presentation at Luiss University 1 December 2014 Alitalia – Etihad Transaction Case Study Alitalia (AZ) Summary Overview The Birth of the “New” Alitalia Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana (“CAI” or the “Company”) is a private company that started its operations in January 2009 The Company currently flies to 103 destinations, of which 26 in Italy and 77 for the rest of the world, 186 routes and more than 4,700 weekly flights. In 2013: – Carried 23 million passengers – Generated €3.4 billion revenues One of the youngest fleets in the world with an average age of 6.5 years Alitalia is a member of the SkyTeam global alliance and, since 2010, forms part with Air France-KLM and Delta Air Lines of the main air transport Transatlantic Joint Venture The Hub The Fleet The Crew Fiumicino Airport Source: Companies press releases and websites, news articles. 1 Alitalia: A Long Story of Difficulties Since 2000 Alitalia has cumulated negative results in excess of ca.€9.0bn, including ca.€3.0bn of liquidation costs related to Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane. Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana Net Income Evolution (€m) Net Income Evolution (€m) 93 (69) (168) (168) (256) (280) (327) (512) (495) (569) (626) (844) (907) (1,000)(1) 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008E 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A Cumulated Net Income (€m) Cumulated Net Income (€m) (256) (327) (494) (1,163) (1,070) (1,582) (563) (843) (2,426) (2,594) (1,411) (3,220) (3,715) (4,715) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008E In the period 2000 – 2008E, Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane In the period 2009 – 2013, Alitalia – Compagnia Aerea Italiana posted a cumulated net loss of ca.€4.7bn posted a cumulated net loss of ca.€1.4bn According to Italian press news, the estimated liquidation cost amounted to ca.€3.0bn(2) Sources: Alitalia annual reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography AIR FRANCE Carlier, c., ed. 'La construction aeronautique, Ie transport aenen, a I'aube du XXIeme siecle'. Centre d'Histoire de l'Industrie Aeronautique et Spatiale, Uni­ versity of Paris I, 1989. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Histoire de I'aviation civile'. Vincennes, Comite Latecoere and Service Historique de l'Annee de l'Air, 1994. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Airbus, un succes industriel europeen'. Paris, Institut d'Histoire de l'Industrie, 1995. Chadeau, E. 'Le reve et la puissance, I'avion et son siecle'. Paris, Fayard, 1996. Dacharry, M. 'Geographie du transport aerien'. Paris, LITEC, 1981. Esperou, R. 'Histoire d'Air France'. La Guerche, Editions Ouest France, 1986. Funel, P., ed. 'Le transport aerien fran~ais'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1982. Guarino, J-G. 'La politique economique des entreprises de transport aerien, Ie cas Air France, environnement et choix'. Doctoral thesis, Nice University, 1977. Hamelin, P., ed. 'Transports 1993, professions en devenir, enjeux et dereglementation'. Paris, Ecole nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, 1992. Le Due, M., ed. 'Services publics de reseau et Europe'. Paris, Documentation fran­ ~ise, 1995. Maoui, G., Neiertz, N., ed. 'Entre ciel et terre', History of Paris Airports. Paris, Le Cherche Midi, 1995. Marais, J-G. and Simi, R 'Caviation commerciale'. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1964. Merlin, P. 'Geographie, economie et planification des transports'. Paris, Presses uni- versitaires de France, 1991. Merlin, P. 'Les transports en France'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1994. Naveau, J. 'CEurope et Ie transport aerien'. Brussels, Bruylant, 1983. Neiertz, N. 'La coordination des transports en France de 1918 a nos jours'. Unpub­ lished doctoral thesis, Paris IV- Sorbonne University, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Marzo 2018
    Periodico del master in giornalismo dell’Università IULM - Anno 5 - Numero 5 - 16 Marzo 2018 Il decollo di Malpensa Air Italy, la nuova compagnia dei cieli italiani, punta tutto sul rilancio dell'aeroporto milanese 2 SOMMARIO MILANO MOBILITÀ Air Italy, «Saremo leader dei cieli italiani» 3 di Giulia Galliano Sacchetto e Alice Scaglioni POLITICA Milano, PD primo partito. I perché del voto 9 di Luca Palladino e Alessandro Vinci CULTURA Tempo di Libri, Francesco Piccolo conquista Milano 1813 di Beatrice Barbato SANITÀ Buongiorno Dottoressa, la clinica per donne 1819 di Enrica Iacono QUINDI... QUANDO? 23 a cura di Alessandro Follis e Nausica Samela THAT'S MILANO 25 a cura di Chiara Colangelo e Giulia Diamanti 16 MARZO 2018 3 MOBILITÀ Air Italy, «Saremo leader dei cieli italiani» Nata dalle ceneri di Meridiana, si pone l'obiettivo di diventare compagnia di riferimento per il mercato italiano, facendo di Malpensa un vero hub. di GIULIA GALLIANO SACCHETTO e ALICE SCAGLIONI 16 MARZO 2018 4 MOBILITÀ l 2018 ha portato con sé una grande novità sui cieli italiani, e forse l’hub di Milano Malpensa non sarà più un’illusione seguita da malinconiche smentite. La nascita della nuova compagnia di volo italiana, Air Italy, sorta dalle ceneri del- Ila precedente Meridiana, e grazie agli investimenti di Qatar Airways, apre uno spiraglio nel discorso degli aeroporti ita- liani, e nell’eterna lotta tra Fiumicino e Malpensa. Air Italy ha SLOGAN visto la luce come innovativa fase di sviluppo e di crescita della La nuova compagnia di volo compagnia privata Meridiana, originariamente fondata con il italiana, Air Italy, nata per rilanciare ex-Meridiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Ala Littoria
    The Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the South East European Air Mail Connection to North America, 1939‐1941 Ratomir Zivkovic [email protected] I. Introduction • On September 3rd, 1939, France and Great Britain entered into the war with Germany. • PANAM changed the terminal point on its Southern Route from Marseille to Lisbon, Portugal, ( Foreign Air Mail Contract No. 18), on September 6th, 1939. • Ala Littoria service from Lisbon to Rome, so‐called “Route of the 45th parallel,” became major air mail route for the mail between continental Europe, Turkey and North America . II. The development of International Air Mail in the Kingdom of S.H.S. (Kraljevina S.H.S.), later Kingdom of Yugoslavia (Kraljevina Yugoslavia) A. Belgrade on the first transcontinental air route from Paris to Istanbul • Our Wings Club (Klub Naša krila) was formed December 1, 1918. • In March of 1923, Yugoslav government awarded a concession and signed an agreement on air carriage with the French company C.F.R.N.A. (Compagnie Franco‐Roumaine de la Navigation Aérienne). • Contracts were renewed with C.I.D.N.A. (Compagnie Internationale de la Navigation Aérienne) in 1926 and with Air France, successor of C.F.R.N.A. and C.I.D.N.A., in 1933. • Until 1927, mail was shipped by air only to the cities on the C.F.R.N.A. /C.I.D.N.A route. • On March 27th, 1927, a new Belgrade airport was opened in Zemun replacing the temporary Pančevo airport C.F.R.N.A./ C.I.D.N.A service: Paris, Strasbourg, Nuremberg, Prague, Warsaw, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest, Istanbul • First flight out of Belgrade (Pančevo Airport) to Paris was on April 16, 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • Identificazione E Affidabilità Delle Aerolinee Nell'odierno
    Identificazione e affidabilità delle aerolinee nell’odierno scenario del trasporto aereo Stante la difficoltà di “conoscere” l’aerolinea con cui si volerà, può almeno l’utente avere la certezza che le autorità preposte abbiano svolto idonea opera di vaglio e controllo? Uno dei principali problemi con cui oggi si deve confrontare l’utente del trasporto aereo è indubbiamente costituito dall’identità del vettore che si prenderà carico di trasportarlo alla sua destinazione. Una volta, fino a qualche anno fa, questo problema davvero non esisteva. In Italia in particolare, chi decideva di volare sapeva abbastanza di Alitalia, Itavia, Meridiana per poter prendere con cognizione di causa la sua decisione; parlare di scelta del vettore sarebbe errato, in quanto i collegamenti che questi operatori esercitavano raramente erano in sovrapposizione e come tali in concorrenza fra loro. Ma oggi il problema è molto peggiorato e usando questi termini non necessariamente intendiamo far riferimento all’aspetto della safety, che pure ha la sua valenza, quanto all’altro argomento assai più elementare di conoscere, nel senso di aver almeno sentito parlare del vettore che ci porterà a destinazione. L’esempio più eclatante di quanto stiamo dicendo è dato dal recente caso della Flash Air e dell’incidente di Sharm El Sheikh. Non fraintendiamo: abbiamo già scritto e ripetiamo anche in questa occasione, che fintanto che la commissione di inchiesta non conclude la sua indagine è assolutamente sbagliato –come purtroppo è accaduto- sparare a zero a priori contro la compagnia aerea. Il discorso vale per questo come per ogni altro malaugurato incidente che si dovesse verificare.
    [Show full text]
  • Airbus/EADS Sign a Titanium Supply Agreement With
    GDM 17/2009R 20th April 2009 Airbus/EADS sign a Titanium supply agreement with VSMPO-AVISMA, integrated structure of the Russian Technologies State Corporation Airbus/EADS and VSMPO-AVISMA boost their long-term relationship Airbus, the world’s leading aircraft manufacturer, its parent company EADS, a global leader in aerospace, defence and related services and the Russian Technologies State Corporation’s integrated structure VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation, the Russian Titanium manufacturer, have signed the biggest and longest-term contract in the history of Airbus/EADS cooperation with Russian industry. The agreement was signed today in Moscow by Sergey Chemezov, General Director of the Russian Technologies State Corporation and Tom Enders, President and CEO of Airbus in the presence of Vladimir Putin, Russian Prime-Minister, Walter Jürgen Schmid, German Ambassador to Russia, Jean de Gliniasty, French Ambassador to Russia and Juan Antonio March Pujol, Spanish Ambassador to Russia. The agreement covers the supply of Titanium to Airbus and other EADS Divisions until 2020. The scope of the contract includes the supply of Titanium and covers die forging parts for all existing Airbus aircraft, including new programmes such as the A350XWB. VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation may also machine Titanium products in order to develop a vertically integrated Titanium supply chain, starting from raw materials to finished products. The contract comes as a confirmation of the framework agreement signed in July 2008 at Farnborough Airshow. The new agreement further boosts the relationship between the companies, which dates back to the early 1990s. It also enlarges Airbus’ cooperation with the Russian aviation industry, which currently includes production of components for Airbus at Russian plants, passenger to freighter aircraft conversions (P2F) and joint Research & Technology (R&T) projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel, Life-Style, Energy Use and Environmental Impact
    Air travel, life-style, energy use and environmental impact Stefan Kruger Nielsen Ph.D. dissertation September 2001 Financed by the Danish Energy Agency’s Energy Research Programme Department of Civil Engineering Technical University of Denmark Building 118 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark http://www.bvg.dtu.dk 2001 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document Report BYG DTU R-021 2001 ISSN 1601-2917 ISBN 87-7877-076-9 Executive summary This summary describes the results of a Ph.D. study that was carried out in the Energy Planning Group, Department for Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, in a three-year period starting in August 1998 and ending in September 2001. The project was funded by a research grant from the Danish Energy Research Programme. The overall aim of this project is to investigate the linkages between energy use, life style and environmental impact. As a case of study, this report investigates the future possibilities for reducing the growth in greenhouse gas emissions from commercial civil air transport, that is passenger air travel and airfreight. The reason for this choice of focus is that we found that commercial civil air transport may become a relatively large energy consumer and greenhouse gas emitter in the future. For example, according to different scenarios presented by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), commercial civil air transport's fuel burn may grow by between 0,8 percent a factor of 1,6 and 16 between 1990 and 2050. The actual growth in fuel consumption will depend on the future growth in airborne passenger travel and freight and the improvement rate for the specific fuel efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoke, Fire and Fumes in Transport Aircraft
    SMOKE, FIRE AND FUMES IN TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT PAST HISTORY, CURRENT RISKS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATIONS Part 2: Training Second Edition 2018 A Specialist Paper by the Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com About the Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS) The RAeS is the world’s only professional body dedicated to the entire aerospace community. Established in 1866 to further the art, science and engineering of aeronautics, the Society has been at the forefront of developments in aerospace ever since. We seek to i) promote the highest possible standards in aerospace disciplines; ii) provide specialist information and act as a central forum for the exchange of ideas; and iii) play a leading role in influencing opinion on aerospace matters. The RAeS is also working with the Government and industry leaders within the Aerospace Growth Partnership (AGP). About the Honorable Company of Air Pilots The Company was established as a Guild in 1929 in order to ensure that pilots and navigators of the (then) fledgling aviation industry were accepted and regarded as professionals. From the beginning, the Guild was modelled on the lines of the Livery Companies of the City of London, which were originally established to protect the interests and standards of those involved in their respective trades or professions. In 1956, the Guild was formally recognised as a Livery Company. In 2014, it was granted a Royal Charter in the name of the Honourable Company of Air Pilots. Today, the principal activities of the Company are centred on sponsoring and encouraging action and activities designed to ensure that aircraft are piloted and navigated safely by individuals who are highly competent, self-reliant, dependable and respected.
    [Show full text]