DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Europe 431 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 34 712 35 311 26 612 28 120 28 177 30 204 37 757 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 1 996 2 300 1 779 1 613 1 764 1 773 1 712 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 16 878 18 076 13 033 12 590 13 266 13 315 13 633 Tench Tinca tinca 11 1 833 1 772 1 606 1 744 2 008 1 957 1 788 Bleak Alburnus alburnus 11 296 3 841 413 529 474 557 259 Barbel Barbus barbus 11 93 93 148 125 112 160 404 Mediterranean barbel Barbus meridionalis 11 10 5 1 1 0 0 0 ...A Barbus cyclolepis 11 1 1 - 18 2 0 0 Common nase Chondrostoma nasus 11 32 36 33 53 168 218 182 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 918 1 092 804 869 888 998 1 149 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 2 596 4 381 2 817 3 662 4 951 5 730 3 563 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 2 203 5 255 2 160 2 245 2 164 4 211 1 624 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 21 207 20 350 15 732 14 831 16 041 16 937 18 618 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 150 133 91 67 45 73 220 Orfe(=Ide) Leuciscus idus 11 2 721 4 260 3 761 4 847 3 111 3 177 3 573 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 0 0 - - - - 0 Chub Leuciscus cephalus 11 28 16 39 24 22 41 68 Chubs nei Leuciscus spp 11 24 27 21 16 16 17 14 Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 546 585 554 589 673 729 671 Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix 11 1 551 1 190 1 923 1 979 1 777 2 382 1 564 Bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 11 505 244 442 398 532 267 377 Vimba bream Vimba vimba 11 47 54 111 128 127 211 200 Sichel Pelecus cultratus 11 932 875 611 527 544 522 657 Asp Aspius aspius 11 203 222 215 245 422 437 394 Danube bleak Chalcalburnus chalcoides 11 2 3 7 6 8 2 1 Black carp Mylopharyngodon piceus 11 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 Wuchang bream Megalobrama amblycephala 11 3 ... ... 2 4 3 3 White bream Blicca bjoerkna 11 528 1 069 435 383 387 306 310 Cyprinids nei Cyprinidae 11 25 319 25 065 25 639 23 918 24 067 26 535 28 362 Weatherfish Misgurnus fossilis 11 - - - 1 2 - - Northern pike Esox lucius 13 20 152 20 337 18 592 17 888 18 527 18 275 18 984 Wels(=Som)catfish Silurus glanis 13 6 480 6 712 5 443 6 044 7 003 8 010 7 510 Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus 13 18 11 18 8 57 0 2 Burbot Lota lota 13 2 580 3 308 3 195 3 244 3 082 2 383 2 209 European perch Perca fluviatilis 13 17 854 19 487 17 898 16 186 18 305 19 153 20 184 Ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus 13 1 16 4 8 30 204 93 Pike-perch Sander lucioperca 13 8 652 9 676 8 329 7 824 9 232 9 008 8 123 Freshwater gobies nei Gobiidae 13 77 71 53 56 41 60 77 Freshwater fishes nei Osteichthyes 13 50 626 58 754 53 461 51 390 52 552 48 557 59 555 Danube sturgeon(=Osetr) Acipenser gueldenstaedtii 21 224 193 121 140 70 66 37 Sterlet sturgeon Acipenser ruthenus 21 17 16 19 17 45 12 53 Starry sturgeon Acipenser stellatus 21 151 118 31 41 10 12 7 Beluga Huso huso 21 64 57 38 39 14 6 4 Sturgeons nei Acipenseridae 21 70 56 77 47 41 57 95 European eel Anguilla anguilla 22 3 296 2 817 2 763 2 798 2 828 2 709 2 667 Atlantic salmon Salmo salar 23 1 969 1 646 1 716 1 713 1 479 1 596 1 761 Sea trout Salmo trutta 23 2 391 2 217 2 233 2 208 2 187 2 223 2 296 Trouts nei Salmo spp 23 1 168 1 238 853 984 1 035 1 114 1 095 Pink(=Humpback)salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha 23 16 927 11 061 23 576 42 680 29 161 43 593 13 758 Chum(=Keta=Dog)salmon Oncorhynchus keta 23 13 864 11 668 11 019 20 250 27 834 28 561 27 347 Masu(=Cherry) salmon Oncorhynchus masou 23 2 14 7 9 6 9 11 Sockeye(=Red)salmon Oncorhynchus nerka 23 13 671 12 715 11 263 15 742 16 338 21 370 19 496 Chinook(=Spring=King)salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 23 179 95 105 205 264 254 764 Coho(=Silver)salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch 23 1 233 976 797 442 671 2 303 2 418 Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss 23 2 622 3 029 722 719 2 129 2 061 2 272 Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis 23 11 6 7 12 7 13 14 Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus 23 166 147 76 61 88 52 63 Huchen Hucho hucho 23 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Grayling Thymallus thymallus 23 211 203 231 229 320 317 317 European smelt Osmerus eperlanus 23 3 713 1 704 1 390 1 692 1 313 1 313 1 182 Rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax 23 1 417 361 48 485 504 16 78 Smelts nei Osmerus spp, Hypomesus spp 23 3 965 4 160 3 879 4 644 3 935 3 910 4 109 Vendace Coregonus albula 23 5 547 5 661 4 889 4 797 4 523 4 398 4 478 European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus 23 1 902 1 889 2 177 2 176 2 334 2 262 2 249 Houting Coregonus oxyrinchus 23 11 6 2 2 1 2 - Whitefishes nei Coregonus spp 23 14 622 15 795 13 315 16 128 14 281 12 272 12 500 Salmonoids nei Salmonoidei 23 2 248 2 322 1 978 1 672 2 221 2 074 1 550 Pontic shad Alosa pontica 24 507 831 624 854 453 468 1 023 Shads nei Alosa spp 24 48 50 51 44 56 84 77 Caspian shads Caspialosa spp 24 239 24 24 46 85 118 84 Black and Caspian Sea sprat Clupeonella cultriventris 24 32 864 20 242 19 828 25 981 20 468 18 424 9 317 River lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis 25 106 147 127 180 144 181 185 Lampreys nei Petromyzontidae 25 206 154 158 171 114 114 115 Three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus 25 1 725 1 525 1 523 1 675 1 830 1 836 1 538 European flounder Platichthys flesus 31 - - 16 7 8 - - Navaga(=Wachna cod) Eleginus navaga 32 127 207 245 43 45 - 62 Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus 33 8 40 61 60 55 50 52 So-iuy mullet Mugil soiuy 33 91 73 19 - 6 7 6 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 341 74 329 447 572 315 350 Pacific herring Clupea pallasii 35 - - - - 3 - - Big-scale sand smelt Atherina boyeri 37 390 400 614 100 478 150 155 432 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Noble crayfish Astacus astacus 41 ... ... ... ... 80 80 80 Signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus 41 50 101 ... ... 259 260 259 White-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes 41 0 - - - - - - Red swamp crawfish Procambarus clarkii 41 1 750 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 Euro-American crayfishes nei Astacidae, Cambaridae 41 235 219 220 256 134 159 197 Freshwater crustaceans nei Crustacea 41 1 769 3 135 3 405 3 192 2 648 3 764 7 259 Freshwater molluscs nei Mollusca 51 451 ... ... - - - - Frogs Rana spp 71 29 0 0 - 15 - 0 Aquatic invertebrates nei Invertebrata 77 - 16 40 157 148 112 336 Total 354 374 353 541 318 098 356 826 353 322 376 609 357 057 433 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by countries or areas Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par pays ou zones Europe - Eaux continentales (b) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por países o áreas Europa - Aguas continentales Country or area Pays ou zone 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 País o área t t t t t t t t t t Albania 814 955 1 373 1 167 1 265 F 1 807 2 210 2 442 2 598 2 191 Andorra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Austria 432 439 362 350 372 400 370 360 350 350 Belarus 979 553 943 5 877 6 925 890 900 F 900 F 900 F 900 F Belgium 536 511 511 511 511 496 496 496 512 511 Bosnia Herzg 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F Bulgaria 2 475 861 1 640 1 453 1 824 2 434 2 025 1 916 1 068 1 194 Channel Is 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - Croatia 10 17 34 25 19 37 33 46 60 45 Czech Rep 4 190 4 654 4 646 4 983 5 127 4 528 4 242 4 646 4 276 4 164 Denmark 206 183 99 77 129 123 61 41 41 30 Estonia 3 108 3 190 2 461 4 578 3 593 2 373 2 472 2 941 2 665 2 835 Faroe Is 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - Finland 36 813 34 782 34 782 35 563 35 563 36 265 36 265 36 513 36 513 36 513 FYRMacedonia 135 208 128 148 162 213 246 89 122 122 France 3 046 2 859 2 641 2 600 F 2 600 F 2 600 F 2 600 F 2 600 F 2 600 F 2 600 F Germany 22 868 22 868 22 818 22 798 22 611 22 611 21 400 21 442 21 462 22 062 Greece 3 280 3 433 3 181 3 000 3 166 1 940 1 580 1 413 1 439 1 425 Hungary 7 514 7 101 6 638 6 750 6 536 7 242 7 609 7 543 7 024 7 394 Iceland 370 176 160 210 225 222 219 173 185 231 Ireland 801 881 902 796 615 610 521 443 178 214 Isle of Man 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - Italy 5 436 4 565 5 527 4 242 4 379 5 099 3 823 3 915 3 944 3 552 Latvia 610 612 581 581 565 360 356 328 310 349 Liechtensten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Lithuania 1 715 1 912 1 854 758 1 959 1 766 1 547 1 437 1 874 1 600 Luxembourg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Malta 0 0 0 - - - - - - - Moldova Rep 309 344 387 565 343 487 531 612 1 160 1 407 Montenegro ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ecology and Management of the European Grayling Thymallus Thymallus (Linnaeus)
    The ecology and management of the European grayling Thymallus thymallus (Linnaeus). Interim report Item Type monograph Authors Ingram, A.; Ibbotson, A.; Gallagher, M. Publisher Institute of Freshwater Ecology Download date 03/10/2021 22:03:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24874 The Ecology and Management of the European Grayling Thymallus thymallus (Linnaeus) Interim Report Ingram A Ibbotson A Gallagher M The Ecology and Management of the European Grayling Thymallus thymallus (Linnaeus) Interim Report Ingram A Ibbotson A Gallagher M INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT 'In accordance with our normal practice, this report is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed, and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for the whole or any part of its contents. Neither the whole nor any part of this report or any reference thereto may be included in any published document, circular or statement, nor published or referred to in any way without our written approval of the form and context in which it may appear.' 11 CHAPTER 1 1 Overall aim A collaborative research and development project between the Institute of Freshwater Ecology and the Environment Agency in the UK, to review the ecology, status and management of grayling in order to provide recommendations for future management of grayling fisheries in England and Wales. 2 Objectives • To review grayling ecology, status and management practice in concentrating on England and Wales but including published literature from Europe and North America, where appropriate. • To recommend best management practices on the basis of objective 1 and produce a guidance leaflet for internal and external circulation which promotes the key issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Updated Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, Distribution and Conservation Status
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2017), 4(Suppl. 1): 1–114 Received: October 18, 2016 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: February 30, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Hamidreza MEHRABAN1, Keivan ABBASI2, Yazdan KEIVANY3, Brian W. COAD4 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center. Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Anzali, Iran 3Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran 4Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4 Canada *Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to reviews and summarize the results of the systematic and zoogeographical research on the Iranian inland ichthyofauna that has been carried out for more than 200 years. Since the work of J.J. Heckel (1846-1849), the number of valid species has increased significantly and the systematic status of many of the species has changed, and reorganization and updating of the published information has become essential. Here we take the opportunity to provide a new and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran based on literature and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history and new fish collections. This article lists 288 species in 107 genera, 28 families, 22 orders and 3 classes reported from different Iranian basins. However, presence of 23 reported species in Iranian waters needs confirmation by specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Adaptive Genetic Variation for Conservation and Management of the European Grayling (Thymallus Thymallus)
    Assessing adaptive genetic variation for conservation and management of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) J. V. Huml PhD 2017 Assessing adaptive genetic variation for conservation and management of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) Jana Vanessa Huml A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Faculty of Science and Engineering Manchester Metropolitan University Abstract In this PhD, functional genetic variation of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) is assessed to inform conservation and management of the species. This study is the first to characterize immune variation at the Major Histocompatibility complex (MHC) in grayling. The MHC is a marker of high ecological relevance, because of the strong association between immunity and fitness. Taking advantage of advances in sequencing technology, an analytical pipeline optimized for high-throughput, efficient and accurate genotyping of multi-gene families in non-model species is presented. Immune genetic variation is compared to neutral marker data. Results confirm the hypothesis that neutral marker variation does not predict immune genetic variation. Further, the possible effect of supplementing wild populations with hatchery-reared fish on immune genetic variation is evaluated. Significantly lower estimates of heterozygosity were found in stocked than purely native populations. Lower differentiation at immune genes than at neutral markers are indicative of the effects of balancing selection acting upon the MHC, within purely native, but not stocked populations. Furthermore species distribution modelling is used to identify environmental parameters shaping the distribution of grayling. To evaluate risks imposed by climate change, the sensitivity of grayling to climatic variables and range changes under predicted future scenarios are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Huchen (Hucho Hucho) ERSS
    Huchen (Hucho hucho) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, January 2019, February 2019 Web Version, 4/30/2019 Photo: Liquid Art. Licensed under CC-SA 4.0 International. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Danube_Salmon_-_Huchen_(Hucho_hucho).jpg. (January 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Europe: Danube drainage [Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, and Ukraine].” “Population has declined [in Slovenia] due to pollution and river regulation. Conservation measures include artificial propagation and stocking [Povz 1996]. Status of threat: Regionally extinct [Bianco and Ketmaier 2016].” 1 “Considered locally extinct (extirpated) in 1990 [in Switzerland] [Vilcinskas 1993].” “Extinct in the wild in 2000 [in Czech Republic] [Lusk and Hanel 2000]. This species is a native species in the basin of the Black Sea (the rivers Morava and Dyje). At present, its local and time- limited occurrence depends on the stocking material from artificial culture. Conditions that will facilitate the formation of a permanent population under natural conditions are not available [Lusk et al. 2004]. […] Status of threat: extinct in the wild [Lusk et al. 2011].” From Freyhof and Kottelat (2008): “The species is severely fragmented within the Danube drainage, where most populations exclusively depend on stocking and natural reproduction is very limited due to habitat alterations and flow regime changes.” From Grabowska et al. (2010): “The exceptional case is huchen (or Danubian salmon), Hucho hucho. The huchen’s native range in Poland was restricted to two small rivers (Czarna Orawa and Czadeczka) of the Danube River basin, […]” Status in the United States Froese and Pauly (2019) report an introduction to the United States between 1870 and 1874 that did not result in an established population.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Labidesthes Sicculus
    Version 2, 2015 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 1 Atherinidae Atherinidae Sand Smelt Distinguishing Features: — (Atherina boyeri) — Sand Smelt (Non-native) Old World Silversides Old World Silversides Old World (Atherina boyeri) Two widely separated dorsal fins Eye wider than Silver color snout length 39-49 lateral line scales 2 anal spines, 13-15.5 rays Rainbow Smelt (Non -Native) (Osmerus mordax) No dorsal spines Pale green dorsally Single dorsal with adipose fin Coloring: Silver Elongated, pointed snout No anal spines Size: Length: up to 145mm SL Pink/purple/blue iridescence on sides Distinguishing Features: Dorsal spines (total): 7-10 Brook Silverside (Native) 1 spine, 10-11 rays Dorsal soft rays (total): 8-16 (Labidesthes sicculus) 4 spines Anal spines: 2 Anal soft rays: 13-15.5 Eye diameter wider than snout length Habitat: Pelagic in lakes, slow or still waters Similar Species: Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax), 75-80 lateral line scales Brook Silverside (Labidesthes sicculus) Elongated anal fin Images are not to scale 2 3 Centrarchidae Centrarchidae Redear Sunfish Distinguishing Features: (Lepomis microlophus) Redear Sunfish (Non-native) — — Sunfishes (Lepomis microlophus) Sunfishes Red on opercular flap No iridescent lines on cheek Long, pointed pectoral fins Bluegill (Native) Dark blotch at base (Lepomis macrochirus) of dorsal fin No red on opercular flap Coloring: Brownish-green to gray Blue-purple iridescence on cheek Bright red outer margin on opercular flap
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Report 2020
    MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD ANDAND THE THEFORESTRY FORESTRY ANNUALANNUAL REPORT REPORT MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD AND THEAND FORESTRY THE FORESTRY ON THEON STATETHE STATE AND AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF OF AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE20202020 2020AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL REPORT REPORT 2020 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2020 AGRICULTURAL REPORT) AGRICULTURALСъдържание REPORT 2020 Списък на използваните съкращения 7 РАЗДЕЛ А 11 I. СЪСТОЯНИЕ И РАЗВИТИЕTable of НАContents НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА. М Abbreviation list 6 SECTION A 13 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. PLACE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 13 II. AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN 2019 AND FORECASTS FOR 2020 19 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 19 1.1. Use of agricultural land 19 1.2. Use of agricultural parcels 20 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 20 1.3. Registration of farmers 21 1.4.State Land Fund participation in land relations in Bulgaria 22 1.4.1. Providing SLF Own Terrains for Rent or Lease 22 1.4.2. Distribution of pastures, grasslands and meadows, part of a state or municipal land fund, in accordance with the procedure of Article 37 and the ALOUA 22 1.4.3. Establishment of limited rights in rem over SLF lands 23 1.5. Activities and Contracts for Reinstated Ownership Map and Registers Maintenance 23 1.6. Land Relations 23 1.6.1. Consolidation of Agricultural Land 24 1.7. Agricultural Land Protection Activities 24 2. Economic and Production Results in 2019 and forecast data for 2020 25 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Species
    Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: 59–71 DOI 10.3897/mbmg.5.66557 Research Article Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany 2 German Environment Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 3 University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 3, 45141 Essen, Germany Corresponding author: Till-Hendrik Macher ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pieter Boets | Received 26 March 2021 | Accepted 10 June 2021 | Published 13 July 2021 Abstract Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, and non-invasively at moderate costs. Because water in a catchment flows to the lowest point in the landscape, often a stream, it can col- lect traces of terrestrial species via surface or subsurface runoff along its way or when specimens come into direct contact with water (e.g., when drinking). Thus, fish eDNA metabarcoding data can provide information on fish but also on other vertebrate species that live in riparian habitats. This additional data may offer a much more comprehensive approach for assessing vertebrate diversity at no additional costs. Studies on how the sampling strategy affects species detection especially of stream-associated communities, however, are scarce. We therefore performed an analysis on the effects of biological replication on both fish as well as (semi-)terrestrial species detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France A
    Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France A. Maire, P. Laffaille, J.F. Maire, L. Buisson To cite this version: A. Maire, P. Laffaille, J.F. Maire, L. Buisson. Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France. River Research and Applications, Wiley, 2016, 33 (4), pp.524-537. 10.1002/rra.3107. hal-01426354 HAL Id: hal-01426354 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01426354 Submitted on 2 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License IDENTIFICATION OF PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF STREAM FISH ASSEMBLAGES: IMPLICATIONS FOR RIVER MANAGEMENT IN FRANCE A. MAIREa*,†, P. LAFFAILLEb,c, J.-F. MAIREd AND L. BUISSONb,e a Irstea; UR HYAX, Pôle Onema-Irstea Hydroécologie des plans d’eau; Centre d’Aix-en-Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France b CNRS; UMR 5245 EcoLab, (Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement), Toulouse, France c Université de Toulouse, INP, UPS; EcoLab; ENSAT, Castanet Tolosan, France d ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab Composites Department, Châtillon, France e Université de Toulouse, INP, UPS; EcoLab, Toulouse, France ABSTRACT Financial and human resources allocated to biodiversity conservation are often limited, making it impossible to protect all natural places, and priority areas for protection must be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Europe
    467 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 33 823 35 937 29 408 31 390 27 734 28 978 28 655 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 1 934 2 029 2 223 2 243 3 250 2 439 2 241 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 12 755 13 381 13 351 13 951 14 695 17 883 17 729 Tench Tinca tinca 11 3 019 4 053 2 455 2 253 1 686 1 491 1 328 Bleak Alburnus alburnus 11 682 547 441 269 231 213 219 Barbel Barbus barbus 11 300 195 412 224 205 170 188 Mediterranean barbel Barbus meridionalis 11 0 0 0 - - - - ...A Barbus cyclolepis 11 ... 0 0 - - - - Common nase Chondrostoma nasus 11 159 137 189 134 156 195 123 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 367 345 506 332 351 305 19 057 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 3 254 2 778 3 293 3 613 3 653 7 277 7 482 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 4 259 4 956 4 915 3 789 3 670 6 328 6 378 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 13 243 16 331 17 160 17 553 18 361 17 757 14 151 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 108 139 96 8 077 9 380 8 977 7 516 Orfe(=Ide) Leuciscus idus 11 5 040 5 374 5 330 4 812 5 979 6 240 5 316 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 4 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Bioaccumulation in Representative Organisms from Different Trophic Levels of the Caspian Sea
    Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Item Type article Authors Mirzajani, A.R.; Hamidian, A.H.; Karami, M. Download date 01/10/2021 01:50:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/37675 Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 15(3) 1027- 1043 2016 Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Mirzajani A.R.1,2; Hamidian A.H.1*; Karami M.1 Received: May 2015 Accepted: October 2015 Abstract The bioaccumulations of metals Cu, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Mn, Zn and Fe were measured in bivalves, Cerastoderma glucaum, and four species of fishes including Alburnus chalcoides, Liza aurata, Rutilus frisii and Sander lucioperca from various trophic levels of the Caspian food web. The concentrations of Cd, Cr, Co and Ni in most samples of fish were below the detection limits; while the concentrations were detected in most samples of bivalve C. glucaum. The stable nitrogen isotope ratios varied among the samples from C. glucaum (δ15N=3.5 ‰) to S. lucioperca (δ15N=13.1‰). Among the four fish species, while the highest concentrations of Mn, Ni and Fe were observed in L. aurata, the lowest concentrations of Mn and Fe were observed in S. lucioperca. These species also had the lowest and highest trophic levels with an average of 3.3 and 4.2, respectively. No accumulation of metals with increase in body size was observed in Downloaded from jifro.ir at 9:20 +0330 on Sunday February 25th 2018 muscles of species from different trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]