Agricultural Report 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park
Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park October 2006 Abbreviations AF Agricultural Fund BAS Bulgarian Academy of Science BD Basin Directorate BDA Biodiversity Act (Bulgaria) BGN Bulgarian Leva BSPB Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds CBD Convention on Conservation of Biological Diversity CC Consultative Council CHH Cultural Historical Heritage CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CMS Conservation Management System CoM Council of Ministers dka Decares (1,000m2) EA Environmental assessment EAFA Executive Agency for Fishing and Aquaculture EEA Environmental Executive Agency EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMEPA Enterprise for management of environmental protection activities ESE Ecologically sustainable enterprise EU European Union EUNIS European Nature Information System FF Forestry Fund FMS Forest management section GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System ha Hectare IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources km Kilometre l Litre LAG Local Action Group m Metre m/s Metres per second m2 Square metre m3 Cubic metre MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MDC Main drainage canal MoEW Ministry of Environment and Waters MoF Ministry of Finance MP Management Plan MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MWH Montgomery Watson Hauser m/s Metres per second NFB National Forestry Board NGO Non Governmental Organisation NIMH National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology NP Nature -
Birdwatching Tour
PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
Metal Bioaccumulation in Representative Organisms from Different Trophic Levels of the Caspian Sea
Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Item Type article Authors Mirzajani, A.R.; Hamidian, A.H.; Karami, M. Download date 01/10/2021 01:50:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/37675 Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 15(3) 1027- 1043 2016 Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Mirzajani A.R.1,2; Hamidian A.H.1*; Karami M.1 Received: May 2015 Accepted: October 2015 Abstract The bioaccumulations of metals Cu, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Mn, Zn and Fe were measured in bivalves, Cerastoderma glucaum, and four species of fishes including Alburnus chalcoides, Liza aurata, Rutilus frisii and Sander lucioperca from various trophic levels of the Caspian food web. The concentrations of Cd, Cr, Co and Ni in most samples of fish were below the detection limits; while the concentrations were detected in most samples of bivalve C. glucaum. The stable nitrogen isotope ratios varied among the samples from C. glucaum (δ15N=3.5 ‰) to S. lucioperca (δ15N=13.1‰). Among the four fish species, while the highest concentrations of Mn, Ni and Fe were observed in L. aurata, the lowest concentrations of Mn and Fe were observed in S. lucioperca. These species also had the lowest and highest trophic levels with an average of 3.3 and 4.2, respectively. No accumulation of metals with increase in body size was observed in Downloaded from jifro.ir at 9:20 +0330 on Sunday February 25th 2018 muscles of species from different trophic levels. -
Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores -
Conservation and Restoration of Forest Habitats in 10 Natura 2000 Sites in Bulgaria PDF 13.15 MB
Project LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF FOREST HABITATS IN 10 NATURA 2000 SITES Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests © Katerina Rakovska / WWF 1 PROJECT DATA PROJECT LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests, LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 www.wwf.bg/what_we_do/protected_areas/10parks/news CO-FUNDING: LIFE + Programme (EC financial instrument for the environment). DURATION: January 2010 - June 2014 PROJECT BUDGET: 1 236 834 €, of which 615 199 € EC co-funding PARTNERS: Executive Forestry Agency (EFA), WWF, 10 Nature Park Directorates: Bulgarka, Vitosha, Vrachanski Balkan, Zlatni Pyasatsi, Persina, Rilski Manastir, Rusenski Lom, Sinite Kamani, Strandhza, Shumensko Plato, Sofia Forest Seed-Control Station and Pazardzhik Poplar Station. 2 PROJECT GOALS The project goal was to local trees and shrubs. improve the conservation status Habitat quality improvement was of 10 Sites of Community planned through restoration of Importance (Natura 2000 sites) rare plant species characteristic managed by the Executive of the target habitats. Forestry Agency (EFA) through conservation and restoration of Bulgaria has limited experience 11 riparian and wetland habitats in management and restoration in forests. The total area of target of riverine and wetland habitats. habitats conserved or restored is The current project was an 21 000 ha. The intention was to opportunity to gain experience achieve the conservation of target and share the lessons learnt habitats through placement of through distribution of good specialised infrastructure (fences, practices for conservation and wooden grates, bridges, tourist restoration of habitats in sites spots) in order to restrict human managed by the EFA, which can impact (access of people and be used in other Natura 2000 vehicles). -
Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species
429 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 34 329 34 712 35 311 26 612 28 120 27 818 30 204 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 2 272 1 996 2 300 1 779 1 613 1 764 1 773 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 12 571 16 878 18 076 13 033 12 590 13 266 13 315 Tench Tinca tinca 11 1 704 1 833 1 772 1 606 1 744 2 008 1 901 Bleak Alburnus alburnus 11 554 296 3 841 413 529 474 557 Barbel Barbus barbus 11 129 93 93 148 125 112 92 Mediterranean barbel Barbus meridionalis 11 ... 10 5 1 1 0 0 ...A Barbus cyclolepis 11 ... 1 1 - 18 2 0 Common nase Chondrostoma nasus 11 27 32 36 33 53 45 218 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 846 918 1 092 804 869 888 992 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 2 598 2 596 4 381 2 817 3 662 4 806 5 737 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 2 599 2 203 5 255 2 160 2 245 2 164 4 211 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 19 266 21 207 20 350 15 732 14 831 16 041 16 937 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 102 150 133 91 67 45 26 Orfe(=Ide) Leuciscus idus 11 2 483 2 721 4 260 3 761 4 847 3 111 3 177 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 0 0 0 - - - - Chub Leuciscus cephalus 11 35 37 16 39 39 23 29 Chubs nei Leuciscus spp 11 31 24 27 21 16 16 17 Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 490 546 585 554 589 673 701 Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix 11 2 602 1 551 1 190 1 923 1 979 1 739 2 381 Bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 11 319 505 244 442 398 532 267 Vimba bream Vimba vimba 11 97 47 54 111 128 426 211 Sichel Pelecus cultratus 11 1 041 932 875 611 527 544 522 Asp Aspius aspius 11 204 203 222 215 245 422 352 Danube bleak Chalcalburnus chalcoides 11 .. -
(Eia) of Investment Proposal For
SUPPLEMENTED UPDATED TERMS OF REFERENCE ON THE SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) OF INVESTMENT PROPOSAL FOR "IMPROVING THE ROUTE OF LOT 3.2 OF THE “STRUMA MOTORWAY“ Sofia January, 2016 1 Table of Contents: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Parameters of the Investment proposal ................................................................................ 8 1.А. Description of the physical characteristics of the investment proposal and the necessary areas (such as utilized land, agricultural land, woodland, etc.) during the construction phase and during the operation phase ................................................................................... 8 1.B Description of the main characteristics of the production processes, for instance, the type and quantity of the prime and raw materials used, including of dangerous substances listed in Annex No. 3 to EPA, which will be available in the undertaking/facility as well as the capacity of facilities for their storage and use in cases under art. 99b of EPA ........ 41 1. C. Determination of the type and the quantity of the expected waste and emissions (pollution of waters, air and soils; noise; vibrations; radiations) as a result of the exploitation of the investment proposal .................................................................................................. 42 2. Alternatives for Implementing the Investment Proposal ................................................... -
Walking in Bulgarias National Parks Free
FREE WALKING IN BULGARIAS NATIONAL PARKS PDF Julian Perry | 256 pages | 15 May 2010 | Cicerone Press | 9781852845742 | English | Cumbria, United Kingdom Walks in Bulgaria's National Parks - 12 multi-day… | Cicerone Press This is a fascinating country where eastern and western influences have become entwined and hospitality is engrained. Bulgaria also contains some of the most dramatic and breathtaking mountain scenery to be Walking in Bulgarias National Parks anywhere in Europe and Walking in Bulgarias National Parks is especially true in the Rila and Pirin rangesthe highest in the country and the entire Balkan region. The Rila and Pirin Mountain ranges of Bulgaria offer some of the very best mountain Walking in Bulgarias National Parks in Europe. An added bonus being that the series of waymarked trails here in Bulgaria offer a much more tranquil trekking experience as they see nothing like the number of hikers other ranges in Europe do. This challenging self-guided walking holiday encompasses both the Rila and Pirin Mountains and is most definitely aimed at the experienced, dedicated mountain walker. Expect dramatic scenery, as you walk firstly in the Rila, the region of the seven lakes, through wild flower meadows and over high mountain passes before visiting the world famous, ornate Rila Monastery. Next up are the magnificent marbled Pirin Mountains. Rhodope also Rodopi or Rhodopi is the largest mountain in Bulgaria, spanning one seventh of the territory of the country. The mountain is situated in the Southern part of Bulgaria and the southernmost part of it is situated on the territory of Greece. The highest peak is Golyam Perelik m a. -
Complex, Inter-Linked Relationships and the Elimination of What Is at First Sight an Insig- Nificant Element Might Lead to the Destruc- Tion of the Whole System
Values of biodiversity complex, inter-linked relationships and the elimination of what is at first sight an insig- nificant element might lead to the destruc- tion of the whole system. We should remember that potential profits that could be obtained in the future from species which are not used today are also part of the non-market value of biodiversity. We do not know about the useful characteristics of plants and animals, which could (if we do not lose them) be applied in the future in agri- culture, medicine and other areas of the eco- nomy. Biodiversity is also of great importance for recreation, for which there is still no ac- A rare plant species Dionysia tapetodes cepted means of determining economic value. Methods of calculating non-market value are currently being developed. This is a com- plex calculation, which has yet to be used in Turkmenistan. In the 1990s there were attempts to economically evaluate the non-market value of biodiversity of the earth, which showed that the total economic value of the world’s ecosystem functions is US $16-54 trillion each year, a sum that considerably exceeds the World Gross Product. 4.3. Cultural and Traditional Values of Biodiversity Throughout the history of the Turkmen people natural resources have always been highly treasured. Animals and plants were used for food, construction and heating of homes, fabric production and household dishes, in carpet weaving and so on. Many medicinal plants were used by wise men (tebibs) as remedies for different diseases. Over time, the natural and climatic conditions in Turkmenistan helped form the particular attitude of the Turkmen people to the surrounding wildlife, which was part of their life and culture. -
Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report
Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report Tbilisi 2013 INTRODUCTION Botanical and Zoological surveys have been carried in order to address the key data gap existing in ESIA of Dariali HPP Project from the Biodiversity standpoint that is provided in the “Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report” that includes two Annexes: I. Survey and comparative analysis of flora and vegetation of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Botanists: Dr Mariam Kimeridze and Mr David Chelidze) and II. Survey and comparative analysis of fauna of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Zoologists: Dr Alexander Bukhnikashvili, Dr Teimuraz Kokosadze and Mrs Marine Gioshvili). Three small areas of land were removed from the Kazbegi National Park for the Dariali HPP construction totaling 8,737 ha that belonged to the area within the Boundaries of Traditional Use Zone of the KNP. Three territories have been added to the Protected Areas as compensation areas for the land lost at Dariali due to HPP: Nature Monument of Sakhiznari Cliff Columns-335,7ha, Nature Monument of the Abano Mineral Lake-0,04 ha and Nature Monument of the Truso Travertines-4,2 ha. For additional information with regard to impact of Dariali HPP construction on KNP please see the report prepared by Dr Mariam Kimeridze “Impact of Dariali HPP on Kazbegi National Oark Traditional USE Zone” dated 31.05.2013). The detailed botanical and zoological studies were carried out in the river Tergi gorge within the borders of the Project Corridor and Compensation Sites. -
Vnct8c1kp0d6509lf04fkqne.Pdf
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (AGRARIAN REPORT 2018) AGRARIAN REPORT 2018 III. TRADE IN AGRICULTURAL GOODS 83 1. Level and dynamics of foreign trade in agrarian goods in 2017 83 Table of contents 2. Geographical distribution of foreign trade in agricultural goods 84 3. Agricultural trading by groups of commodities 89 List of abbreviations 15 4. Development of foreign trade in agricultural goods in 2018 96 SECTION А 15 5. Activities supporting the export of agricultural production 97 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. IV. SUPPORT FOR THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 101 THE PLACE OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 15 1. Support under the First Pillar of the EU Common Agricultural Policy 101 II. DEVELOPMENT OF AGRARIAN SECTOR IN 2017 AND FORECASTS FOR 2018 23 1.1. Area-based direct payments, national complements to direct payments and specific 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 23 support 111 1.1. Use of lands designated for agriculture 23 1.2. Market support mechanisms 115 1.2. Use of land parcels 24 1.2.1. Milk Sector 116 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 24 1.2.2. Fruit and Vegetables sector 118 1.3. Registration of farmers 25 1.2.3. Bee-keeping sector 120 1.4. Participation of the State Land Fund (SLF) in land relations in Bulgaria 26 1.2.4. Wine sector 122 1.4.1. Provision of properties by the SLF for lease or rental 26 1.2.5. -
Danubeparks Final Report A4quer 25 07 2014.Indd
1 Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve 2 Srebarna Nature Reserve 3 Kalimok-Brushlen Protected Site 4 Rusenski Lom Nature Park 5 Persina Nature Park 6 Djerdap National Park 7 Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve 8 Kopački rit Nature Park 9 Lonjsko Polje Nature Park 10 Duna-Dráva National Park 11 Duna-Ipoly National Park 12 Dunajské luhy Protected Landscape Area 13 Záhorie Protected Landscape Area 14 Donau-Auen National Park 15 Donauauwald Neuburg Ingolstadt DANUBEPARKS STEP 2.0 PROJECT REPORT 2012 – 2014 Imprint c/o Donau-Auen National Park 2Schloss Orth, 2304 Orth an der Donau, Austria Project Manager: Georg Frank Phone: +43/2212/3450-19, Fax: +43/2212/3450-17 [email protected] www.danubeparks.org Photos: Daniel Petrescu, Rosenberger, Kovacs, Frank, Leona Valeriu, Baumgartner, Wagner, Manzano, Zinke, Bandacu, Hafner, Hoyer, Nagy, Kern, Suciu, Schmidt, Buchner/Bird- Life, Fiala, Zwefo, Bruck, Kracher, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Srebarna Nature Reserve, Kalimok-Brushlen Pro- tected Site, Rusenski Lom Nature Park, Persina Nature Park, Djerdap National Park, Gornje Podunavjle Special Nature Reserve, Kopački-rit Nature Park, Lonjsko Polje Nature Park, Duna-Dráva National Park, Duna-Ipoly National Park, BROZ, Donau-Auen Nationalpark, Donauauwald Neuburg Ingol- stadt, ICPDR, Ballnus, Alessandro, Pala, Lebensministerium Layout: Michael Kalb, www.michaelkalb.at Printed by Donau Forum Druck Print run of 1,000. © July 2014. Produced using environmentally-friendly technologies and materials. Errors and omissions excepted. The DANUBEPARKS Network The Danube River hosts immense natural values. officially founded. Since then, much has been well as the tourism industry through DCC (Danube Protected Areas are responsible for the conserva- achieved.