DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species 429 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 34 329 34 712 35 311 26 612 28 120 27 818 30 204 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 2 272 1 996 2 300 1 779 1 613 1 764 1 773 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 12 571 16 878 18 076 13 033 12 590 13 266 13 315 Tench Tinca tinca 11 1 704 1 833 1 772 1 606 1 744 2 008 1 901 Bleak Alburnus alburnus 11 554 296 3 841 413 529 474 557 Barbel Barbus barbus 11 129 93 93 148 125 112 92 Mediterranean barbel Barbus meridionalis 11 ... 10 5 1 1 0 0 ...A Barbus cyclolepis 11 ... 1 1 - 18 2 0 Common nase Chondrostoma nasus 11 27 32 36 33 53 45 218 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 846 918 1 092 804 869 888 992 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 2 598 2 596 4 381 2 817 3 662 4 806 5 737 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 2 599 2 203 5 255 2 160 2 245 2 164 4 211 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 19 266 21 207 20 350 15 732 14 831 16 041 16 937 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 102 150 133 91 67 45 26 Orfe(=Ide) Leuciscus idus 11 2 483 2 721 4 260 3 761 4 847 3 111 3 177 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 0 0 0 - - - - Chub Leuciscus cephalus 11 35 37 16 39 39 23 29 Chubs nei Leuciscus spp 11 31 24 27 21 16 16 17 Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 490 546 585 554 589 673 701 Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix 11 2 602 1 551 1 190 1 923 1 979 1 739 2 381 Bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 11 319 505 244 442 398 532 267 Vimba bream Vimba vimba 11 97 47 54 111 128 426 211 Sichel Pelecus cultratus 11 1 041 932 875 611 527 544 522 Asp Aspius aspius 11 204 203 222 215 245 422 352 Danube bleak Chalcalburnus chalcoides 11 ... 2 3 7 6 8 2 Black carp Mylopharyngodon piceus 11 ... 2 4 1 2 0 0 Wuchang bream Megalobrama amblycephala 11 - 3 ... ... 2 4 3 White bream Blicca bjoerkna 11 538 528 1 069 435 383 387 306 Cyprinids nei Cyprinidae 11 24 187 25 319 25 065 25 639 23 918 24 067 26 535 Weatherfish Misgurnus fossilis 11 - - - - 1 2 - Northern pike Esox lucius 13 18 128 20 152 20 337 18 592 17 888 18 527 18 275 Wels(=Som)catfish Silurus glanis 13 6 958 6 480 6 712 5 443 6 044 7 003 8 010 Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus 13 26 18 11 18 8 57 0 Burbot Lota lota 13 2 550 2 580 3 308 3 195 3 244 3 082 2 383 European perch Perca fluviatilis 13 15 196 17 794 19 427 17 838 16 126 18 245 19 093 Ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus 13 65 1 16 4 8 138 158 Pike-perch Sander lucioperca 13 6 402 8 652 9 676 8 329 7 824 9 095 9 008 Freshwater gobies nei Gobiidae 13 5 77 71 53 56 41 60 Freshwater fishes nei Osteichthyes 13 49 790 51 576 59 704 54 411 52 340 53 894 49 918 Danube sturgeon(=Osetr) Acipenser gueldenstaedtii 21 269 224 193 121 140 70 66 Sterlet sturgeon Acipenser ruthenus 21 13 17 16 19 17 15 39 Starry sturgeon Acipenser stellatus 21 193 151 118 31 41 10 12 Beluga Huso huso 21 68 64 57 38 39 14 6 Sturgeons nei Acipenseridae 21 134 70 56 77 47 41 57 European eel Anguilla anguilla 22 2 483 2 326 1 847 1 783 1 808 1 830 1 709 Atlantic salmon Salmo salar 23 2 129 1 969 1 646 1 716 1 713 1 479 1 596 Sea trout Salmo trutta 23 2 843 2 391 2 217 2 233 2 208 2 187 2 223 Trouts nei Salmo spp 23 1 124 1 168 1 238 853 984 1 035 1 114 Pink(=Humpback)salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha 23 17 961 16 927 11 061 23 576 42 680 29 161 43 593 Chum(=Keta=Dog)salmon Oncorhynchus keta 23 14 127 13 864 11 668 11 019 20 250 27 834 28 561 Masu(=Cherry) salmon Oncorhynchus masou 23 4 2 14 7 9 6 9 Sockeye(=Red)salmon Oncorhynchus nerka 23 12 106 13 671 12 715 11 263 15 742 16 338 21 370 Chinook(=Spring=King)salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 23 163 179 95 105 205 264 254 Coho(=Silver)salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch 23 1 090 1 233 976 797 442 671 2 303 Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss 23 2 034 2 622 3 029 722 719 2 129 2 939 Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis 23 7 11 6 7 12 7 13 Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus 23 136 166 147 76 61 88 52 Huchen Hucho hucho 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Grayling Thymallus thymallus 23 321 211 203 231 229 320 17 European smelt Osmerus eperlanus 23 2 099 3 713 1 704 1 390 1 692 1 313 1 313 Rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax 23 719 1 417 361 48 485 504 16 Smelts nei Osmerus spp, Hypomesus spp 23 3 568 3 965 4 160 3 879 4 644 3 935 3 910 Vendace Coregonus albula 23 5 258 5 547 5 661 4 889 4 797 4 523 4 398 European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus 23 2 605 1 622 1 609 1 897 1 896 2 054 1 982 Houting Coregonus oxyrinchus 23 9 11 6 2 2 1 2 Whitefishes nei Coregonus spp 23 10 718 14 622 15 795 13 315 16 128 14 281 12 272 Salmonoids nei Salmonoidei 23 1 756 2 248 2 322 1 978 1 672 2 221 2 074 Pontic shad Alosa pontica 24 287 507 831 624 854 453 468 Shads nei Alosa spp 24 22 48 50 51 44 56 84 Caspian shads Caspialosa spp 24 176 239 24 24 46 85 118 Black and Caspian Sea sprat Clupeonella cultriventris 24 46 940 32 864 20 242 19 828 25 981 20 468 18 424 River lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis 25 118 106 147 127 180 144 181 Lampreys nei Petromyzontidae 25 21 96 44 48 61 4 4 Three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus 25 965 1 725 1 525 1 523 1 675 1 830 1 836 European flounder Platichthys flesus 31 - - - 16 7 8 - Navaga(=Wachna cod) Eleginus navaga 32 55 127 207 245 43 45 - Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus 33 46 8 40 61 60 55 50 So-iuy mullet Mugil soiuy 33 382 91 73 19 - 6 7 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 61 341 74 329 447 572 315 Pacific herring Clupea pallasii 35 - - - - - 3 - Big-scale sand smelt Atherina boyeri 37 326 390 400 614 100 478 150 430 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Noble crayfish Astacus astacus 41 ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 Signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus 41 80 50 101 - - - 1 White-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes 41 0 0 - - - - - Red swamp crawfish Procambarus clarkii 41 2 000 1 750 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 Euro-American crayfishes nei Astacidae, Cambaridae 41 142 235 219 220 256 472 497 Freshwater crustaceans nei Crustacea 41 1 747 1 769 3 135 3 405 3 192 2 648 3 764 Freshwater molluscs nei Mollusca 51 - 451 ... ... - - - Frogs Rana spp 71 ... 29 0 0 - 15 - Aquatic invertebrates nei Invertebrata 77 - - 16 40 157 148 112 Total 345 450 353 913 353 071 317 618 356 351 352 791 376 782 431 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by countries or areas Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par pays ou zones Europe - Eaux continentales (b) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por países o áreas Europa - Aguas continentales Country or area Pays ou zone 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 País o área t t t t t t t t t t Albania 823 814 955 1 373 1 167 1 265 F 1 807 2 210 2 442 2 598 Andorra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Austria 451 432 439 362 350 372 400 370 360 350 Belarus 457 979 553 943 5 877 6 925 890 900 F 900 F 900 F Belgium 511 536 511 511 511 511 496 496 496 512 Bosnia Herzg 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F 2 000 F Bulgaria 2 336 2 475 861 1 640 1 453 1 824 2 434 2 025 1 916 1 068 Channel Is 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - Croatia 10 F 10 17 34 25 19 37 33 46 60 Czech Rep 3 952 4 190 4 654 4 646 4 983 5 127 4 528 4 242 4 646 4 276 Denmark 349 206 183 99 77 129 123 61 43 41 Estonia 3 878 3 108 3 190 2 461 4 578 3 593 2 373 2 472 2 941 2 665 Faroe Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Finland 36 813 36 813 34 782 34 782 35 563 35 563 36 265 36 265 36 512 36 212 FYRMacedonia 131 135 208 128 148 162 213 246 89 122 France 4 500 2 134 F 2 131 F 2 130 F 2 130 F 2 130 F 2 120 F 2 110 F 2 100 F 2 100 F Germany 22 916 22 868 22 868 22 818 22 798 22 611 22 611 21 400 21 442 21 462 Greece 2 818 3 280 3 433 3 181 3 000 3 166 1 940 1 580 1 413 1 439 Hungary 7 265 7 514 7 101 6 638 6 750 6 536 7 242 7 609 7 543 7 024 Iceland 416 370 176 160 210 225 222 219 173 185 Ireland 3 976 801 881 902 796 615 610 521 443 178 Isle of Man 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - Italy 4 667 5 436 4 565 5 527 4 242 4 379 5 099 3 823 3 915 3 944 Latvia 501 610 612 581 581 565 360 356 328 310 Liechtensten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lithuania 1 737 1 715 1 912 1 854 758 1 959 1 766 1 547 1 437 1 874 Luxembourg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Malta 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - Moldova Rep 491 309 344 387 565 343 487 531 612 1 160 Montenegro ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Report 2020
    MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD ANDAND THE THEFORESTRY FORESTRY ANNUALANNUAL REPORT REPORT MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD AND THEAND FORESTRY THE FORESTRY ON THEON STATETHE STATE AND AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF OF AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE20202020 2020AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL REPORT REPORT 2020 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2020 AGRICULTURAL REPORT) AGRICULTURALСъдържание REPORT 2020 Списък на използваните съкращения 7 РАЗДЕЛ А 11 I. СЪСТОЯНИЕ И РАЗВИТИЕTable of НАContents НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА. М Abbreviation list 6 SECTION A 13 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. PLACE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 13 II. AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN 2019 AND FORECASTS FOR 2020 19 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 19 1.1. Use of agricultural land 19 1.2. Use of agricultural parcels 20 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 20 1.3. Registration of farmers 21 1.4.State Land Fund participation in land relations in Bulgaria 22 1.4.1. Providing SLF Own Terrains for Rent or Lease 22 1.4.2. Distribution of pastures, grasslands and meadows, part of a state or municipal land fund, in accordance with the procedure of Article 37 and the ALOUA 22 1.4.3. Establishment of limited rights in rem over SLF lands 23 1.5. Activities and Contracts for Reinstated Ownership Map and Registers Maintenance 23 1.6. Land Relations 23 1.6.1. Consolidation of Agricultural Land 24 1.7. Agricultural Land Protection Activities 24 2. Economic and Production Results in 2019 and forecast data for 2020 25 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Bioaccumulation in Representative Organisms from Different Trophic Levels of the Caspian Sea
    Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Item Type article Authors Mirzajani, A.R.; Hamidian, A.H.; Karami, M. Download date 01/10/2021 01:50:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/37675 Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 15(3) 1027- 1043 2016 Metal bioaccumulation in representative organisms from different trophic levels of the Caspian Sea Mirzajani A.R.1,2; Hamidian A.H.1*; Karami M.1 Received: May 2015 Accepted: October 2015 Abstract The bioaccumulations of metals Cu, Cd, Ni, Cr, Co, Mn, Zn and Fe were measured in bivalves, Cerastoderma glucaum, and four species of fishes including Alburnus chalcoides, Liza aurata, Rutilus frisii and Sander lucioperca from various trophic levels of the Caspian food web. The concentrations of Cd, Cr, Co and Ni in most samples of fish were below the detection limits; while the concentrations were detected in most samples of bivalve C. glucaum. The stable nitrogen isotope ratios varied among the samples from C. glucaum (δ15N=3.5 ‰) to S. lucioperca (δ15N=13.1‰). Among the four fish species, while the highest concentrations of Mn, Ni and Fe were observed in L. aurata, the lowest concentrations of Mn and Fe were observed in S. lucioperca. These species also had the lowest and highest trophic levels with an average of 3.3 and 4.2, respectively. No accumulation of metals with increase in body size was observed in Downloaded from jifro.ir at 9:20 +0330 on Sunday February 25th 2018 muscles of species from different trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • Complex, Inter-Linked Relationships and the Elimination of What Is at First Sight an Insig- Nificant Element Might Lead to the Destruc- Tion of the Whole System
    Values of biodiversity complex, inter-linked relationships and the elimination of what is at first sight an insig- nificant element might lead to the destruc- tion of the whole system. We should remember that potential profits that could be obtained in the future from species which are not used today are also part of the non-market value of biodiversity. We do not know about the useful characteristics of plants and animals, which could (if we do not lose them) be applied in the future in agri- culture, medicine and other areas of the eco- nomy. Biodiversity is also of great importance for recreation, for which there is still no ac- A rare plant species Dionysia tapetodes cepted means of determining economic value. Methods of calculating non-market value are currently being developed. This is a com- plex calculation, which has yet to be used in Turkmenistan. In the 1990s there were attempts to economically evaluate the non-market value of biodiversity of the earth, which showed that the total economic value of the world’s ecosystem functions is US $16-54 trillion each year, a sum that considerably exceeds the World Gross Product. 4.3. Cultural and Traditional Values of Biodiversity Throughout the history of the Turkmen people natural resources have always been highly treasured. Animals and plants were used for food, construction and heating of homes, fabric production and household dishes, in carpet weaving and so on. Many medicinal plants were used by wise men (tebibs) as remedies for different diseases. Over time, the natural and climatic conditions in Turkmenistan helped form the particular attitude of the Turkmen people to the surrounding wildlife, which was part of their life and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report
    Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report Tbilisi 2013 INTRODUCTION Botanical and Zoological surveys have been carried in order to address the key data gap existing in ESIA of Dariali HPP Project from the Biodiversity standpoint that is provided in the “Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report” that includes two Annexes: I. Survey and comparative analysis of flora and vegetation of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Botanists: Dr Mariam Kimeridze and Mr David Chelidze) and II. Survey and comparative analysis of fauna of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Zoologists: Dr Alexander Bukhnikashvili, Dr Teimuraz Kokosadze and Mrs Marine Gioshvili). Three small areas of land were removed from the Kazbegi National Park for the Dariali HPP construction totaling 8,737 ha that belonged to the area within the Boundaries of Traditional Use Zone of the KNP. Three territories have been added to the Protected Areas as compensation areas for the land lost at Dariali due to HPP: Nature Monument of Sakhiznari Cliff Columns-335,7ha, Nature Monument of the Abano Mineral Lake-0,04 ha and Nature Monument of the Truso Travertines-4,2 ha. For additional information with regard to impact of Dariali HPP construction on KNP please see the report prepared by Dr Mariam Kimeridze “Impact of Dariali HPP on Kazbegi National Oark Traditional USE Zone” dated 31.05.2013). The detailed botanical and zoological studies were carried out in the river Tergi gorge within the borders of the Project Corridor and Compensation Sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List of the Romanian Vertebrate Fauna
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 377–411 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0028-1 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE ROMANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA DUMITRU MURARIU Abstract. Compiling different bibliographical sources, a total of 732 taxa of specific and subspecific order remained. It is about the six large vertebrate classes of Romanian fauna. The first class (Cyclostomata) is represented by only four species, and Pisces (here considered super-class) – by 184 taxa. The rest of 544 taxa belong to Tetrapoda super-class which includes the other four vertebrate classes: Amphibia (20 taxa); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) and Mammalia (110 taxa). Résumé. Cette contribution à la systématique des vertébrés de Roumanie s’adresse à tous ceux qui sont intéressés par la zoologie en général et par la classification de ce groupe en spécial. Elle représente le début d’une thème de confrontation des opinions des spécialistes du domaine, ayant pour but final d’offrir aux élèves, aux étudiants, aux professeurs de biologie ainsi qu’à tous ceux intéressés, une synthèse actualisée de la classification des vertébrés de Roumanie. En compilant différentes sources bibliographiques, on a retenu un total de plus de 732 taxons d’ordre spécifique et sous-spécifique. Il s’agît des six grandes classes de vertébrés. La première classe (Cyclostomata) est représentée dans la faune de Roumanie par quatre espèces, tandis que Pisces (considérée ici au niveau de surclasse) l’est par 184 taxons. Le reste de 544 taxons font partie d’une autre surclasse (Tetrapoda) qui réunit les autres quatre classes de vertébrés: Amphibia (20 taxons); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) et Mammalia (110 taxons).
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Spawning Migrations of Potamodromous Fish Species Via Edna
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Monitoring spawning migrations of potamodromous fsh species via eDNA Bettina Thalinger1,3,4*, Elisabeth Wolf1,2,4, Michael Traugott1 & Josef Wanzenböck2 Potamodromous fsh are considered important indicators of habitat connectivity in freshwater ecosystems, but they are globally threatened by anthropogenic impacts. Hence, non-invasive techniques are necessary for monitoring during spawning migrations. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) potentially facilitates these eforts, albeit quantitative examinations of spawning migrations remain so far mostly uncharted. Here, we investigated spawning migrations of Danube bleak, Alburnus mento, and Vimba bream, Vimba vimba, and found a strong correlation between daily visual fsh counts and downstream eDNA signals obtained from fltered water samples analysed with digital PCR and end- point PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis. By accounting for daily discharge fuctuations, it was possible to predict eDNA signal strength from the number of migrating fsh: frst, the whole spawning reach was taken into account. Second, the model was validated using eDNA signals and fsh counts obtained from the upper half of the examined river stretch. Consequently, fsh counts and their day-to- day changes could be described via an eDNA-based time series model for the whole migration period. Our fndings highlight the capability of eDNA beyond delivering simple presence/absence data towards efcient and informative monitoring of highly dynamic aquatic processes such as spawning migrations of potamodromous fsh species. Generally, three main types of fsh migration patterns are distinguished according to the type of water body inhabited: while diadromous and oceanodromous migrations commonly receive more attention due to the eco- nomic relevance of taxa such as salmon, tuna, and eel, the importance of potamodromous fsh migrating solely within freshwaters has been frequently overlooked1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the State and Development of Agriculture
    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND THE FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (AGRICULTURAL REPORT `2019) Table of Content Abbreviation list ......................................................................................................................................................7 SECTION A .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. PLACE OF AGRARIAN SECTOR IN NATIONAL ECONOMY ............................................................................. 11 II. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN 2018 AND FORECASTS FOR 2019 ........................................... 16 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture................................................................................ 16 1.1. Use of agricultural land ............................................................................................................................ 16 1.2. Use of agricultural parcels ........................................................................................................................ 17 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System ............................................................................................................ 17 1.3. Registration of farmers ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hpp Vranduk Book 22. Environmental Impact Assessment
    Consortium: HPP VRANDUK Investment ‐ technical documentation of Page preliminary and preparatory activities for 1 of 180 construction of HPP Vranduk Contract no. 162-JP/08 (E-96107) Investment - technical documentation of preliminary and preparatory activities for construction of HPP Vranduk HPP VRANDUK - PRELIMINARY DESIGN - BOOK 22. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME 22.02. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Book 22. Environmental Impact Assessment Volume 22.02. Environmental Impact Study Sarajevo, April 2010 Consortium: HPP VRANDUK Investment ‐ technical documentation of Page preliminary and preparatory activities for 2 of 180 construction of HPP Vranduk HPP VRANDUK – PRELIMINARY DESIGN BOOK 22. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS OF THE PROJECT DOCUMENTATION Book 00. GENERAL PROJECT DICUMENTS Book 01. PROJECT REVIEW Book 02. TOPOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND DOCUMENTATION Book 03. HYDROLOGIC-METEOROLOGICAL DATA BASIS Book 04. GEOLOGICAL, HYDROGEOLOGICAL AND GEOMECHANICAL DATA BASIS Book 05. SEISMIC AND SEISMOLOGICAL DATA BASIS Book 06. FLOODING DATA BASIS WITH CONCEPT DESIGN OF PROTECTION Book 07. PURCHASE AND INDEMNITIES Book 08. SELECTION OF PLANT PARAMETERS Book 09. STORAGE BASIN Book 10. TECHNIČAL SOLUTION – HYDRO-CIVIL PART Volume 10.01. Dam and power house of small generating unit Volume 10.02. Headrace tunnel with intake structure and surge shaft Volume 10.03. Power house of main generating unit Volume 10.04. Deepening of the downstream riverbed Volume 10.05. Roads Book 11. TECHNICAL SOLUTION – HYDRO-MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Volume 11.01. Dam with small generating unit Volume 11.02. Intake structure, penstock and power house Book 12. TECHNICAL SOLUTION – ELECTROMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Volume 12.01. Power house - Main facility Volume 12.02. Power house - Main facility – auxiliary electrical system Volume 12.03.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species Sensitivity Classification for Environmental Impact
    Science of the Total Environment 708 (2020) 135173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Fish species sensitivity classification for environmental impact assessment, conservation and restoration planning ⇑ Ruben van Treeck a, , Jeroen Van Wichelen b, Christian Wolter a a Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany b Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Herman Teirlinckgebouw, Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussels, Belgium highlights graphical abstract Resilience traits of 168 European freshwater lampreys and fishes were analyzed. A classification system of fishes’ sensitivity against mortality was developed. Rheophils and lithophils are more sensitive than limnophils and phytophils. The system informs both impact assessment and rehabilitation planning. article info abstract Article history: Species conservation, river rehabilitation, stock enhancement, environmental impact assessment and Received 12 July 2019 related planning tools require indicators to identify significant impacts but also mitigation success. Received in revised form 23 October 2019 Since river systems are shaped by disturbances from floods and droughts, typical riverine fish species Accepted 23 October 2019 should have evolved life history traits providing resilience against such disturbances. This study compiled Available online 23 November 2019 and analyzed resilience traits of European lampreys and fish species to derive a novel sensitivity classi- Editor: Sergi Sabater fication of species to mortality. We assembled life history traits like maximum length, migration type, mortality, fecundity, age at maturity, and generation time of 168 species and created a novel method to weigh and integrate all traits to generate a final sensitivity score from one (low sensitivity) to three Keywords: Fish mortality (high sensitivity) for each species.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Europe
    431 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Europe - Inland waters C-05 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Europe - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Europa - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 34 712 35 311 26 612 28 120 28 177 30 204 37 757 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 1 996 2 300 1 779 1 613 1 764 1 773 1 712 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 16 878 18 076 13 033 12 590 13 266 13 315 13 633 Tench Tinca tinca 11 1 833 1 772 1 606 1 744 2 008 1 957 1 788 Bleak Alburnus alburnus 11 296 3 841 413 529 474 557 259 Barbel Barbus barbus 11 93 93 148 125 112 160 404 Mediterranean barbel Barbus meridionalis 11 10 5 1 1 0 0 0 ...A Barbus cyclolepis 11 1 1 - 18 2 0 0 Common nase Chondrostoma nasus 11 32 36 33 53 168 218 182 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 918 1 092 804 869 888 998 1 149 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 2 596 4 381 2 817 3 662 4 951 5 730 3 563 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 2 203 5 255 2 160 2 245 2 164 4 211 1 624 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 21 207 20 350 15 732 14 831 16 041 16 937 18 618 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 150 133 91 67 45 73 220 Orfe(=Ide) Leuciscus idus 11 2 721 4 260 3 761 4 847 3 111 3 177 3 573 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 0 0 - - - - 0 Chub Leuciscus cephalus 11 28 16 39 24
    [Show full text]