DOCSLIB.ORG

FAMILY Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 - Chubs, Daces, True Minnows, Roaches, Shiners, Etc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAMILY Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 - Chubs, Daces, True Minnows, Roaches, Shiners, Etc FAMILY Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 - chubs, daces, true minnows, roaches, shiners, etc. SUBFAMILY Leuciscinae Bonaparte, 1835 - chubs, daces, true minnows, roaches, shiners, etc. [=Leuciscini, Scardinii, ?Brachyentri, ?Pachychilae, Chondrostomi, Alburni, Pogonichthi, Abramiformes, ?Paralabeonini, Cochlognathi, Laviniae, Phoxini, Acanthobramae, Bramae, Aspii, Gardonini, Cochlobori, Coelophori, Epicysti, Mesocysti, Plagopterinae, Campostominae, Exoglossinae, Graodontinae, Acrochili, Orthodontes, Chrosomi, Hybognathi, Tiarogae, Luxili, Ericymbae, Phenacobii, Rhinichthyes, Ceratichthyes, Mylochili, Mylopharodontes, Peleci, Medinae, Pimephalinae, Notropinae, Pseudaspinini] Notes: Leuciscini Bonaparte, 1835:[14] [ref. 32242] (subfamily) Leuciscus [genus inferred from the stem, Article 11.7.1.1; also Bonaparte 1837:[7] [ref. 32243]] Scardinii Bonaparte, 1839:fasc. 24, puntate 125 [ref. 4895] (no family-group name) [also Bonaparte 1841:Introduzione [18] [ref. 515]] ?Brachyentri Heckel, 1843:64 [ref. 2066] (Abtheilung) ? Leuciscus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] ?Pachychilae Heckel, 1847:280 [ref. 2068] (Abtheilung) ? Exoglossum [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Chondrostomi Agassiz, 1855:94 [ref. 71] (tribe) Chondrostoma [stem corrected to Chondrostomat- by Jordan 1877:59 [ref. 2374], confirmed by Jordan 1878:786 [ref. 2377] and by Meek 1904:43 [ref. 2958]] Alburni Girard, 1858:255 [ref. 4911] (tribe) Alburnus Pogonichthi Girard, 1858:242 [ref. 4911] (tribe) Pogonichthys [correct stem is Pogonichthy-] Abramiformes Dybowski, 1862:33, 35, 314 [ref. 1168] (subfamily) Abramis [stem changed to Abramid- by Günther 1868:299 [ref. 1990], confirmed by Jordan 1878:790 [ref. 2377] and by Weber & de Beaufort 1916:44 [ref. 4604]; senior objective synonym of Bramae Bleeker, 1863] ?Paralabeonini Bleeker, 1863–64:29 [ref. 4859] (stirps) ? Cochlognathus [also Bleeker 1863b:204 [ref. 397]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Cochlognathi Bleeker, 1863–64:29 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Cochlognathus [also Bleeker 1863b:204 [ref. 397]] Laviniae Bleeker, 1863–64:29 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Lavinia [also Bleeker 1863b:204 [ref. 397]; stem Lavini- confirmed by Fowler 1951b:3 [ref.31928] and by Fowler 1958a:3 [ref. 31840]] Phoxini Bleeker, 1863–64:31 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Phoxinus [also Bleeker 1863b:208 [ref. 397]] Acanthobramae Bleeker, 1863–64:31 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Acanthobrama [also Bleeker 1863b:210 [ref. 397]] Bramae Bleeker, 1863–64:31 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Brama Klein [also Bleeker 1863b:210 [ref. 397]; invalid, Article 39] Aspii Bleeker, 1863–64:32 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Aspius [also Bleeker 1863b:212 [ref. 397]; stem Aspi- confirmed by Fowler 1951b:3 [ref.31928], by Fowler 1958a:3 [ref. 31840] and by Rainboth 1991:171 [ref. 32596]; stem changed to Aspin- by Bogutskaya 1994:616 [ref. 23569]] Gardonini Walecki, 1864:43, 107 [ref. 22969] (subfamily) Gardonus Cochlobori Cope, 1867:354 [ref. 910] (tribe) Exoglossum [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Coelophori Cope, 1867:355 [ref. 910] (tribe) Ericymba [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Epicysti Cope, 1867:355 [ref. 910] (tribe) ? Hybopsis [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Mesocysti Cope, 1867:355 [ref. 910] (tribe) Campostoma [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Plagopterinae Cope, 1874:129 [ref. 932] (subfamily) Plagopterus Campostominae Jordan, 1877:56 [ref. 2374] (subfamily) Campostoma [stem changed to Campostomat- by Jordan 1878:786 [ref. 2377]; original stem Campostom- confirmed by Jordan & Gilbert 1883:145 [ref. 2476]] Exoglossinae Jordan, 1877:60 [ref. 2374] (subfamily) Exoglossum [also Jordan 1878:789 [ref. 2377]] Graodontinae Jordan, 1877:60 [ref. 2374] (subfamily) Graodus [also Jordan 1878:788, 789 [ref. 2377]] Acrochili Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Acrocheilus [as Acrochilus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; stem corrected to Acrocheil- by Cockerell 1909:210 [ref. 32166]] Orthodontes Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Orthodon Chrosomi Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Chrosomus [stem Chrosom- confirmed by Cockerell & Callaway 1909a:122 [ref. 32165]] Hybognathi Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Hybognathus Tiarogae Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Tiaroga Luxili Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Luxilus Ericymbae Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Ericymba Phenacobii Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Phenacobius Rhinichthyes Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Rhinichthys [as Rhinichthyes] Ceratichthyes Jordan, 1878:789 [ref. 2377] (group) Ceratichthys Mylochili Jordan, 1878:790 [ref. 2377] (group) Mylocheilus [as Mylochilus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3] Mylopharodontes Jordan, 1878:790 [ref. 2377] (group) Mylopharodon [stem Mylopharodont- confirmed by Jordan & Evermann 1896a:202 [ref. 2443]] Peleci Jordan, 1878:790 [ref. 2377] (group) Pelecus [stem Pelec- confirmed by Kryzanowsky 1947:58 [ref. 32215]] Medinae Gill, 1890a:3685 [ref. 32974] (subfamily) Meda Pimephalinae Cockerell & Callaway, 1909a:122 [ref. 32165] (subfamily) Pimephales Notropinae Cockerell & Callaway, 1909b:189 [ref. 876] (subfamily) Not Notropis Pseudaspinini Bogutskaya, 1990:925 [ref. 32597] (tribe) Pseudaspius GENUS Abramis Cuvier, 1816 - breams [=Abramis Cuvier [G.], 1816:194, Brama Klein [J. T.], 1775:61, 93, Brama Walbaum [J. J.] (ex Klein), 1792:586, Brama Bleeker [P.] (ex Klein), 1863:211, Leucabramis Smitt [F. A.], 1895:798, Sapa Kazanskii [V. I.], 1928:16, Zopa Fitzinger [L. J. F. J.], 1873:152, 158] Notes: [ref. 993]. Fem. Cyprinus brama Linnaeus, 1758. Type by subsequent designation. Earliest subsequent designation not located. •Valid as Abramis Cuvier, 1816 -- (Howes 1981:46 [ref. 14200], Bogutskaya 1987:936 [ref. 13521], Bogutskaya 1997:162 [ref. 23566], Bogutskaya 1998:54 [ref. 23589], Luo in Chen et al. 1998:95 [ref. 23878], Hänfling & Brandl 2000:267 [ref. 25144], Sideleva 2001:52 [ref. 26181], Sideleva 2003:10 [ref. 27815], Bogutskaya & Naseka 2004:74 [ref. 28183], Kottelat & Freyhof 2007:151 [ref. 29996], Perea et al. 2010:4, 15 [ref. 31802], Bartulović et al. 2011:165 [ref. 31635]). Current status: Valid as Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Brama) [ref. 2618]. Fem. Not available, published in a work that does not conform to the principle of binominal nomenclature. •In the synonymy of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Brama) [ref. 4572]. Fem. Not available, published in a part of work rejected for nomenclatural purposes in Opinion 21 (1938). Based on Klein 1749:61 [ref. 30141]. •In the synonymy of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Brama) [ref. 397]. Fem. Cyprinus brama Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy, as Abramis brama Cuvier. On p. 25 of separate. Based on Brama Klein (unavailable). Objectively invalid; preoccupied by Brama Bloch & Schneider, 1801 in fishes. Also in Bleeker 1863 [ref. 12572]. •In the synonymy of and objective synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Leucabramis) [ref. 4146]. Fem. Cyprinus vimba Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. •Objective synonym of Vimba Fitzinger, 1873. •Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816 -- (Howes 1981:46 [ref. 14200]). Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Sapa) [ref. 14268]. Fem. Cyprinus sapa Pallas, 1814. Original not examined; from Berg 1949:768 [ref. 12882]. •Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816 -- (Berg 1948:768 [ref. 12882]). Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. (Zopa) [ref. 1337]. Fem. Cyprinus sapa Pallas, 1814. Type by subsequent designation. Two included species "(Abr. Ballerus und Sapa)"; type apparently first designated by Jordan 1919:368 [ref. 4904] as sopa. Howes lists Sapa Kasansky, 1928 in the synonymy of Abramis [not investigated]. •Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816 -- (Howes 1981:46 [ref. 14200]). Current status: Synonym of Abramis Cuvier, 1816. Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. Species Abramis ballerus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Swedish bream [=Cyprinus ballerus Linnaeus [C.], 1758:326, Cyprinus farenus Linnaeus [C.], 1758:326] Notes: [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] Lakes of Sweden. Current status: Valid as Abramis ballerus (Linnaeus, 1758). Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. Distribution: Europe to western Asia. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. (farenus) [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] Lake Mälar, Sweden. Current status: Synonym of Abramis ballerus (Linnaeus, 1758). Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. Habitat: freshwater. Species Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) - bream, freshwater bream, bronze bream, carp bream [=Cyprinus brama Linnaeus [C.], 1758:326, Abramis argyreus Valenciennes [A.], in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1844:45, Abramis brama bergi Grib [A. V.] & Vernidub [M. F.], 1935:112, Abramis brama danubii Pavlov [P. I.], 1956:894, Abramis gehini Blanchard [C. E.], 1866:355, Fig. 7, Ciprinus latus Dralet [É.-F.], 1821:25, Cyprinus brama major Forster [J. R.], 1767:356, Abramis melaenus Agassiz [L.], 1835:39, Abramis brama orientalis Berg [L. S.], 1949:774 [327], Abramis brama var. sinegorensis Lukasch [B. S.], 1933:67, Abramis vetula Heckel [J. J.], 1836:230, Pl. 20 (fig. 6), Abramis vulgaris Mauduyt [F.], 1849:30] Notes: [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] European lakes. Current status: Valid as Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758). Leuciscidae: Leuciscinae. Distribution:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chondrostoma Nasus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Common Nase (Chondrostoma nasus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2020 Revised, April 2020 Web Version, 2/8/2021 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: High Photo: André Karwath. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chondrostoma_nasus_(aka).jpg#file. (April 2020). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2021): “Europe: Basins of Black (Danube, Dniestr, South Bug and Dniepr drainages), southern Baltic (Nieman, Odra, Vistula) and southern North Seas (westward to Meuse). […] Asia: Turkey.” Status in the United States No information on occurrence, status, sale or trade in the United States was found. Chondrostoma nasus falls within Group I of New Mexico’s Department of Game and Fish Director’s Species Importation List (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 2010). Group I species “are designated semi-domesticated animals and do not require an importation permit.” With the added restriction of “Not to be used as bait fish.” 1 Means of Introductions in the United States No introductions have been reported in the United States. Remarks Although the accepted and most used common name for Chondrostoma nasus is “Common Nase”, it appears that the simple name “Nase” is sometimes used to refer to C. nasus (Zbinden and Maier 1996; Jirsa et al. 2010). The name “Sneep” also occasionally appears in the literature (Irz et al. 2006). 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From Fricke et al. (2020):
    [Show full text]
  • Qrno. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 CP 2903 77 100 0 Cfcl3
    QRNo. General description of Type of Tariff line code(s) affected, based on Detailed Product Description WTO Justification (e.g. National legal basis and entry into Administration, modification of previously the restriction restriction HS(2012) Article XX(g) of the GATT, etc.) force (i.e. Law, regulation or notified measures, and other comments (Symbol in and Grounds for Restriction, administrative decision) Annex 2 of e.g., Other International the Decision) Commitments (e.g. Montreal Protocol, CITES, etc) 12 3 4 5 6 7 1 Prohibition to CP 2903 77 100 0 CFCl3 (CFC-11) Trichlorofluoromethane Article XX(h) GATT Board of Eurasian Economic Import/export of these ozone destroying import/export ozone CP-X Commission substances from/to the customs territory of the destroying substances 2903 77 200 0 CF2Cl2 (CFC-12) Dichlorodifluoromethane Article 46 of the EAEU Treaty DECISION on August 16, 2012 N Eurasian Economic Union is permitted only in (excluding goods in dated 29 may 2014 and paragraphs 134 the following cases: transit) (all EAEU 2903 77 300 0 C2F3Cl3 (CFC-113) 1,1,2- 4 and 37 of the Protocol on non- On legal acts in the field of non- _to be used solely as a raw material for the countries) Trichlorotrifluoroethane tariff regulation measures against tariff regulation (as last amended at 2 production of other chemicals; third countries Annex No. 7 to the June 2016) EAEU of 29 May 2014 Annex 1 to the Decision N 134 dated 16 August 2012 Unit list of goods subject to prohibitions or restrictions on import or export by countries- members of the
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblage in the Middle Cours of the Kupa River in the Area of MHE Ilovac
    Fish assemblage in the middle cours of the Kupa river in the area of MHE Ilovac Juraj Petravić1, Matija Kresonja1, Martina Petravić2, Ratko Popović1, Milorad Mrakovčić1 1OIKON Ltd- Institute of Applied Ecology, Trg Senjskih uskoka 1-2, 10020 Zagreb, Croatia 2Ministry of Agriculture, Ulica grada Vukovara 78, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Introduction Results and Discussion The objectives of this paper are to determine the qualitative A total of 963 individuals were caught of which 19 species from 14 and quantitative composition of the fish community, and genera, from five families Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Cyprinidae, distribution of native and non-native fishes in the area of the of Siluridae, and Centrarchidae were found. The dominant species the mini-hydroelectric power plant Ilovac on the middle cours was Chub Squalius cephalus which takes up 21.8%, followed by of the Kupa river near the dam Zaluka. The ichthyological area Spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus with 18.4%, the least represented of the river Kupa belongs to the Danube River Basin and to the is Prussian carp Carassius gibelio with 0,2% of total number of fish NATURA 2000 ecological network. caught. During this research, three endemic fish species Danube gudgeon Gobio obtusirostris, Balkan spined loach Cobitis elongata, and Dunabe roach Rutilus virgo was recorded. Endemic species takes up 14,7% of total number of fish caught. As well as two invasive alien species (IAS) Pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus and Pseudorasbora Pseudorasbora parva. Non-native species in the area of MHE Ilovac hold a significant share in the fish community with 10,4 % of total number of fish caught.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry
    The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON THE INSTALLMENT OF SMALL HYDROPOWER STATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITIES OF KHATLON OBLAST IN THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FINAL REPORT September 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency NEWJEC Inc. E C C CR (1) 12-005 Final Report Contents, List of Figures, Abbreviations Data Collection Survey on the Installment of Small Hydropower Stations for the Communities of Khatlon Oblast in the Republic of Tajikistan FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Summary Chapter 1 Preface 1.1 Objectives and Scope of the Study .................................................................................. 1 - 1 1.2 Arrangement of Small Hydropower Potential Sites ......................................................... 1 - 2 1.3 Flowchart of the Study Implementation ........................................................................... 1 - 7 Chapter 2 Overview of Energy Situation in Tajikistan 2.1 Economic Activities and Electricity ................................................................................ 2 - 1 2.1.1 Social and Economic situation in Tajikistan ....................................................... 2 - 1 2.1.2 Energy and Electricity ......................................................................................... 2 - 2 2.1.3 Current Situation and Planning for Power Development .................................... 2 - 9 2.2 Natural Condition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEW DISTRIBUTION DATA for Alburnus Sava %RJXWVND\D =Xsdqňlň -Holî 'LULSDVNR 1DVHND $1' 7HOHVWHV VRXI°D 5LVVR
    Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 2017, 75, 137-142 M. Vucić et al.: New distribution of Alburnus sava and Telestres souffia DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2017-0017 CODEN RIBAEG ISSN 1330-061X (print), 1848-0586 (online) NEW DISTRIBUTION DATA FOR Alburnus sava %RJXWVND\D =XSDQòLò -HOLî 'LULSDVNR 1DVHND$1'7HOHVWHVVRXI°D 5LVVR ,17+(:(67(51 BALKANS Matej Vucić, Ivana Sučić, Dušan Jelić* Croatian Institute for Biodiversity, Croatian Biological Research Society, Lipovac I. 7, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 15 November 2016 The distribution data of Alburnus sava and Telestes souffia has been updated Received in revised form: 1 October 2017 in Croatia in comparison to the previously known data. Alburnus sava is Accepted: 10 October 2017 much more widespread in the Sava drainage and also occurs in the River Available online: 30 October 2017 Sava near the town of Županja, rivers Drina and Bosna. Telestes souffia has a much more restricted range in Croatia than previously believed and is Keywords: only known from the Bregana, small, right tributary of the River Sava on the Alburnus sava Croatian-Slovenian border. Both species are poorly known and threatened. Telestes souffia Distribution data Balkan shemaya Western vairone Riffle dace How to Cite Vucić M., Sučić I., Jelić D. (2017): New distribution data for Alburnus sava Bogutskaya, Zupančič, Jelić, Diripasko & Naseka, 2017 and Telestes souffia (Risso, 1827) in the Western Balkans. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 75, 137-142. DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2017-0017 INTRODUCTION depths. This behaviour makes it almost impossible to catch during classical electrofishing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ichthyofauna of the Moksha River, a Tributary of the Volga River Basin, Russia
    13 4 185 Artaev and Ruchin ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 13 (4): 185–202 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.185 The ichthyofauna of the Moksha River, a tributary of the Volga river basin, Russia Oleg N. Artaev, Alexander B. Ruchin Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Pushta settlement, Mordovia, Russia 431230. Corresponding author: Oleg N. Artaev, [email protected] Abstract The results of an 11-year study of the ichthyofauna in the Moksha River (central part of European Russia) are de- scribed here. Thirty-seven species were recorded, including 34 present in rivers and 26 in lake systems. Relative abundance and the occurrence of fish species from different types of water bodies are provided and the diversity of the ichthyofauna for this region is discussed. Key words Diversity; fish; lakes; Oka River. Academic editor: Bárbara Calegari | Received 18 January 2017 | Accepted 27 March 2017 | Published 28 July 2017 Citation: Artaev ON, Ruchin AB (2017) The ichthyofauna of the Moksha River, a tributary of the Volga river basin, Russia. Check List 13 (4): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.185 Introduction 2013, Kuznetsov and Barkin 2003, Lysenkov et al. 2010, Lysenkov and Pjanov 2015) with some level of The Moksha River is one of the largest tributaries of the information of fish diversity for this region, but they did Oka River drainage, and the largest right-bank tributary not provide a complete scenario of fish abundance and of the Volga river basin. As a result, there is fragmentary distribution extension of the species in the Moksha river information on the diversity of ichthyofauna in this basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Iberian Cyprinids: Habitat Requirements and Vulnerabilities
    Session 1 Cyprinid species: ecology and constraints Iberian cyprinids: habitat requirements and vulnerabilities 2nd Stakeholder Workshop – Iberia – Lisboa, Portugal 20.03.2019 Francisco Godinho Hidroerg 20/03/2018 Francisco Godinho 1 Setting the scene 22/03/2018 Francisco Godinho 2 Relatively small river catchmentsIberian fluvial systems Douro/Duero is the largest one, with 97 600 km2 Loire – 117 000 km2, Rhinne -185 000 km2, Vistula – 194 000 km2, Danube22/03/2018 – 817 000 km2, Volga –Francisco 1 380 Godinho 000 km2 3 Most Iberian rivers present a mediterranean hydrological regime (temporary rivers are common) Vascão river, a tributary of the Guadiana river 22/03/2018 Francisco Godinho 4 Cyprinidae are the characteristic fish taxa of Iberian fluvial ecosystems, occurring from mountain streams (up to 1000 m in altitude) to lowland rivers Natural lakes are rare in the Iberian Peninsula and most natural freshwater bodies are rivers and streams 22/03/2018 Francisco Godinho 5 Six fish-based river types have been distinguished in Portugal (INAG and AFN, 2012) Type 1 - Northern salmonid streams Type 2 - Northern salmonid–cyprinid trans. streams Type 3 - Northern-interior medium-sized cyprinid streams Type 4 - Northern-interior medium-sized cyprinid streams Type 5 - Southern medium-sized cyprinid streams Type 6 - Northern-coastal cyprinid streams With the exception of assemblages in small northern, high altitude streams, native cyprinids dominate most unaltered fish assemblages, showing a high sucess in the hidrological singular 22/03/2018
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Reproduction of Blue Bream (Ballerus Ballerus L.) As A
    animals Article Artificial Reproduction of Blue Bream (Ballerus ballerus L.) as a Conservative Method under Controlled Conditions Przemysław Piech * and Roman Kujawa Department of Ichthyology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, PL 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland; reofi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Quite severe biological imbalances have been caused by the often ill-conceived and destructive actions of humans. The natural environment, with its flora and fauna, has been subjected to a strong, direct or indirect, anthropogenic impact. In consequence, the total population of wild animals has been considerably reduced, despite efforts to compensate for these errors and expand the scope of animal legal protection to include endangered species. Many animal populations on the verge of extinction have been saved. These actions are ongoing and embrace endangered species as well as those which may be threatened with extinction in the near future as a result of climate change. The changes affect economically valuable species and those of low value, whose populations are still relatively strong and stable. Pre-emptive protective actions and developing methods for the reproduction and rearing of rare species may ensure their survival when the ecological balance is upset. The blue bream is one such species which should be protected while there is still time. Abstract: The blue bream Ballerus ballerus (L.) is one of two species of the Ballerus genus occurring in Citation: Piech, P.; Kujawa, R. Europe. The biotechnology for its reproduction under controlled conditions needs to be developed to Artificial Reproduction of Blue Bream conserve its local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Eurasian and American Cyprinids Using Cytochrome B Sequences
    Journal of Fish Biology (2002) 61, 929–944 doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002.2105, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Phylogenetic relationships of Eurasian and American cyprinids using cytochrome b sequences C. C*, N. M*, T. E. D†, A. G‡ M. M. C*§ *Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia, Faculdade de Cieˆncia de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Bloco C2, 3 Piso. 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal, †Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1501, U.S.A. and ‡Laboratoire d’Hydrobiology, Universite´ de Provence, 1 Place Victor Hugo, 1331 Marseille, France (Received 30 January 2002, Accepted 6 August 2002) Neighbour-joining and parsimony analyses identified five lineages of cyprinids: (1) European leuciscins (including Notemigonus)+North American phoxinins (including Phoxinus phoxinus); (2) European gobionins+Pseudorasbora; (3) primarily Asian groups [cultrins+acheilognathins+ gobionins (excluding Abbotina)+xenocyprinins]; (4) Abbottina+Sinocyclocheilus+Acrossocheilus; (5) cyprinins [excluding Sinocyclocheilus and Acrossocheilus]+barbins+labeonins. Relationships among these lineages and the enigmatic taxa Rhodeus were not well-resolved. Tests of mono- phyly of subfamilies and previously proposed relationships were examined by constraining cytochrome b sequences data to fit previous hypotheses. The analysis of constrained trees indicated that sequence data were not consistent with most previously proposed relationships. Inconsistency was largely attributable to Asian taxa, such as Xenocypris and Xenocyprioides. Improved understanding of historical and taxonomic relationships in Cyprinidae will require further morphological and molecular studies on Asian cyprinids and taxa representative of the diversity found in Africa. 2002 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Key words: Cyprinidae; molecular phylogeny; cytochrome b; monophyly of subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation Canals As Tools for Climate Change Adaptation and Fish Biodiversity Management in Southern France Chantal Aspe, André Gilles, Marie Jacqué
    Irrigation canals as tools for climate change adaptation and fish biodiversity management in Southern France Chantal Aspe, André Gilles, Marie Jacqué To cite this version: Chantal Aspe, André Gilles, Marie Jacqué. Irrigation canals as tools for climate change adaptation and fish biodiversity management in Southern France. Regional Environmental Change, Springer Verlag, 2016, 16 (7, SI), pp.1975-1984. 10.1007/s10113-014-0695-8. hal-01444648 HAL Id: hal-01444648 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01444648 Submitted on 18 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Reg Environ Change DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0695-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Irrigation canals as tools for climate change adaptation and fish biodiversity management in Southern France Chantal Aspe • Andre´ Gilles • Marie Jacque´ Received: 9 May 2014 / Accepted: 13 September 2014 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract This paper is based on the interdisciplinary However, they serve as assets for territorial development research conducted in the south of France that analyses the since they combine economic, ecological and social factors different economic, social and environmental roles played whose remodelling is becoming increasingly necessary in by agricultural irrigation canals.
    [Show full text]