DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Compliance Registry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Southwest Power Pool RE June 12, 2017 NERC Defined Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 1 NCR11645 AE Power Services LLC (AEPS) X GOP for Generator Owners in three Interconnections: SPP, ERCOT, and WECC. CFR00180 only has responsibilities for CIP standards as GOP. 2 NCR01056 AEP as Agent for AEP OK Transco., PSCO, and X X X X X X X Full name: American Electric SWEPCO (AEPW) Power Corp. as Agent for AEP Oklahoma Transmission Company, Inc., Public Service Company of Oklahoma, and Southwestern Electric Power Company. AEP entered into a MRRE 9/21/15 with RF as the lead region for all compliance monitoring activities 3 NCR01055 AES Shady Point, LLC (AESSP) X X 4 NCR11570 Arbuckle Mountain Wind Farm LLC (AMWF) X X 5 NCR01060 Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation (AECC) X X X X X 6 NCR10259 Avangrid Renewables (AVNR) X X Coordinated Oversight - LRE is WECC 7 NCR11548 Balko Wind, LLC (BALKO) X X 8 NCR06040 Blue Canyon II Windpower LLC (BCWII) X X 9 NCR06041 Blue Canyon Windpower LLC (BCWI) X X 10 NCR03048 Blue Canyon Windpower V, LLC (BCWV) X X 11 NCR11201 Blue Canyon Windpower VI, LLC (BC6) X X 12 NCR01061 Board Of Public Utilities (Kansas City KS) (BPU) X X X X X X X 13 NCR10319 Board Of Public Utilities, City Of McPherson, X X X X Kansas (MCPHER) 14 NCR01062 Borger Energy Associates, LP (BOEA) X X Page 1 of 7 06/12/2017 Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 15 NCR00769 Boston Energy Trading and Marketing LLC X X Owner and operator of San (EMMT) Juan Mesa, Wilderado, Taloga, and Sleeping Bear Wind facilities in SPP. EMMT entered into a MRRE 8/19/15 with MRO and SPP RE as the lead region for all compliance monitoring activities. Facilities in WECC and TRE have coordinated oversight with WECC as LRE. Facilities in RF are under RF for compliance monitoring. 16 NCR11563 Buckeye Wind Energy, LLC (BEWE) X X Corporate Headquarters- Invenergy, LLC One South Wacker Suite 1900 Chicago, IL 60606 17 NCR11407 Buffalo Dunes Wind Project, LLC (BDWP) X X 18 NCR11081 CPV Keenan II Renewable Energy Company, LLC X X (KREC) 19 NCR11354 Canadian Hills Wind, LLC (CHW) X X 20 NCR11230 Caney River Wind Project, LLC (CRWP) X X 21 NCR05059 Caprock Wind LLC (CAPROCK) X X 22 NCR01067 Carthage Water & Electric Plant (CAWEP) X UFLS-only DP as of March 19, 2015. 23 NCR06043 Central Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. (CVEC) X 24 NCR11291 Chisholm View Wind Project, LLC (CHISHOLM) X X 25 NCR11693 Cimarron Bend Wind Project, LLC (CBW) X X 26 NCR11240 Cimarron Windpower II, LLC (CIMW) X CIMW entered into a MRRE 8/14/15 with TRE as the lead region for all compliance monitoring activities. 27 NCR06033 City Of Abbeville (ABBEVLA) X 28 NCR01068 City Of Alexandria (ALEXLA) X X X X X 29 NCR01071 City Of Clarksdale, Mississippi (CCM) X X X X 30 NCR10227 City Of Ottawa (OTTAWA) X 31 NCR01081 City Utilities Of Springfield, MO (SPRM) X X X X X X X Page 2 of 7 06/12/2017 Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 32 NCR01082 City Water & Light - Jonesboro, Arkansas (CWL) X 33 NCR01083 Cleco Corporate Holdings LLC (CLECO) X X X X X X X X 34 NCR10302 Cloud County Wind Farm, LLC, (CCWF) X X 35 NCR11151 Coffeyville Municipal Light & Power (CMLP) X X 36 NCR11179 Dempsey Ridge Wind Farm, LLC (DRWF) X X 37 NCR11250 Dogwood Power Management, LLC (DPM) X 38 NCR11670 Drift Sand Wind Project LLC (DRIFTSAND) X X 39 NCR11241 Duke Energy Renewables Services, LLC (DEGS) X MRRE- Texas RE lead region. DEGS is GOP for Cimarron Windpower II, LLC and Ironwood WindPower. 40 NCR11662 EDP Renewables North America LLC (EDPR NA) X GOP for wind farms in seven Regions (MRRE with RF as Lead Region). (Pending signed MOU) 41 NCR01227 East Texas Electric Cooperative Inc. (ETEC) X X X X X 42 NCR01092 Eastman Cogeneration Limited Partnership X X (EASTMAN) 43 NCR10122 Exelon Wind 4, LLC (EXWD4) X X 44 NCR06046 Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. Of New Mexico X (FARMCOOPNM) 45 NCR11314 Flat Ridge 2 Wind Energy LLC (FRWEII) X X CFR00180 46 NCR10312 Flat Ridge Wind Energy, LLC (FRWE) X X CFR00180 47 NCR11692 Frontier Windpower, LLC (FRONTIER) X 48 NCR10020 Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. (GSEC) X X 49 NCR11153 Golden Spread Panhandle Wind Ranch, LLC X (GSPWR) 50 NCR11574 Goodwell Wind Project, LLC (GOODWELL) X X 51 NCR01101 Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) X X X X X X X 52 NCR11687 Great Western Wind Energy, LLC (GWWE) X X 53 NCR01103 Green Country Energy, LLC (GREENCOGO) X 54 NCR01104 Green Country Operating Services, LLC X (GREENCOGOP) 55 NCR10400 ITC Great Plains, LLC (ITCGP) X X X MRRE - RF is lead. 56 NCR01072 Independence Power & Light X X X X X X X (Independence,Missouri) (INDN) Page 3 of 7 06/12/2017 Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 57 NCR11718 Invenergy Services LLC (INVENERGY) X 58 NCR11257 Ironwood Windpower, LLC (IRONWOOD) X 59 NCR11329 KODE Novus I, LLC (KODE) X X 60 NCR01107 Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL) X X X X X X X 61 NCR01109 Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (KEPC) X 62 NCR11617 Kingfisher Wind, LLC c/o Apex Wind Asset X X Management (KING) 63 NCR01113 Kiowa Power Partners, LLC (KIOWAPP) X X Kiowa Power Partners entered into a MRRE 1/29/15 with TRE as the lead region for all compliance monitoring activities. 64 NCR01114 Lafayette Utilities System (LAFA) X X X X X X X 65 NCR06047 Lea County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (LCEC) X X 66 NCR10301 Lea Power Partners, LLC (LEAPP) X X 67 NCR10226 Llano Estacado Wind, LP (LLANOEWIND) X X 68 NCR01116 Louisiana Energy & Power Authority (LEPA) X X X The Louisiana Energy Power Authority (LEPA) is a joint action agency serving the power supply needs for seventeen municipal member. LEPA does not have any retail customers. CFR00001 with MISO for BA function. 69 NCR06048 Lubbock Power And Light (LPLTX) X X X TOP CFR with Southwestern Public Service Co. (JRO00055) 70 NCR03044 MISO-MBHydro Contingency Reserve Sharing X Group (MRSG) Page 4 of 7 06/12/2017 Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 71 NCR00826 Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. X X X X X X X MRRE- RF is lead region. (MISO) CFR00001 covers the BA function. CFR00130(LSE), CFR00131(RP), CFR00132(TOP), and CFR00133(TP) cover the MOD standards only. MISO is not responsible for TOP, LSE, RP, TP requirements for any other standard. 72 NCR01118 Midwest Energy, Inc. (MIDW) X X X X 73 NCR06050 Mississippi Delta Energy Agency (MISSDEA) X X 74 NCR06054 NAES Corporation - Dogwood (NAESDOGW) X 75 NCR11236 NAES Corporation - Goodman Energy Center X X (NAESGEC) 76 NCR11451 NAES Corporation - Oklahoma Cogeneration, LLC X X (NAESOKC) 77 NCR11642 NRG Energy Services - Golden Spread (NRGGS) X GOP for two wind farms. 78 NCR11730 NRG Energy Services-Panhandle Wind Ranch X (GOP) (NRGPWR) 79 NCR10019 NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (NEER) X X 80 NCR11070 Noble Great Plains Windpark, LLC (NOBLEGP) X X 81 NCR11607 Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative - HCPP X X (NTEC-HCPP) 82 NCR01124 Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc (NTEC) X X 83 NCR01130 Oklahoma Gas And Electric Co. (OKGE) X X X X X X X 84 NCR04108 Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) X X X X 85 NCR11485 Oneta Power, LLC (ONETA) X X 86 NCR11496 Origin Wind Energy, LLC (ORGNWE) X X 87 NCR01135 Paragould Light & Water Commission X (PARAGOULD) 88 NCR01137 Poplar Bluff (POPBLUFFMO) X 89 NCR11264 Post Rock Wind Power Project, LLC (PRWP) X X 90 NCR01139 Public Service Commission Of Yazoo City (YAZO) X UFLS-only DP as of March 19, 2015. 91 NCR06010 Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc. (RCEC) X X Page 5 of 7 06/12/2017 Public Compliance Registry DPUF GOP RRO RSG TOP PSE TSP Entity LSE GO RC DP RP TO BA PA TP IA NERC ID Name Region Comment 92 NCR10304 Red Hills Wind Project, LLC. (RHWP) X X 93 NCR11234 Rocky Ridge Wind Project, LLC (ROCKY) X X 94 NCR11560 Roosevelt Wind Project, LLC (RWP) X X 95 NCR01142 Sikeston Board Of Municipal Utilities X X X X (SIKESTONMO) 96 NCR11586 Slate Creek Wind, LLC (SLATE) X X 97 NCR11049 Smoky Hills Wind Farm, LLC (SMOKY) X X 98 NCR10316 Smoky Hills Wind Project II, LLC (SMOKY2) X X 99 NCR11616 Southern Power Company (SPC) X X SPC entered into the Coordinated Oversight program with SERC as the LRE 100 NCR01143 Southwest Power Pool (SPP) X X X X X X SERC is Compliance Enforcement Authority. 101 NCR01144 Southwestern Power Administration (SPA) X X X X X 102 NCR01145 Southwestern Public Service Co. (Xcel Energy) X X X X X X X Xcel Energy entered into a (SPS) MRRE 9/2/15 with MRO as the lead region for all compliance monitoring activities. 103 NCR11322 Spearville 3, LLC (SPEAR3) X X 104 NCR11323 Spinning Spur Wind, LLC (SPINSPUR) X X 105 NCR01148 Sunflower Electric Power Corporation (SECI) X X X X X X X 106 NCR00633 Tenaska Gateway Partners Ltd (TENASGATEW) X X 107 NCR01152 Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government X (TERREBONNE) 108 NCR01342 Tex-La Electric Cooperative Of Texas, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy

    The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy

    THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF KANSAS WIND ENERGY NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Prepared By: Alan Claus Anderson Britton Gibson Polsinelli Shughart, Vice Chair, Polsinelli Shughart, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group Energy Practice Group Scott W. White, Ph.D. Luke Hagedorn Founder, Polsinelli Shughart, Associate, Kansas Energy Information Network Energy Practice Group ABOUT THE AUTHORS Alan Claus Anderson Alan Claus Anderson is a shareholder attorney and the Vice Chair of Polsinelli Shughart's Energy Practice Group. He has extensive experience representing and serving as lead counsel and outside general counsel to public and private domestic and international companies in the energy industry. He was selected for membership in the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators and has led numerous successful oil and gas acquisitions and joint development projects domestically and internationally. Mr. Anderson also represents developers, lenders, investors and suppliers in renewable energy projects throughout the country that represent more than 3,500 MW in wind and solar projects under development and more than $2 billion in wind and solar projects in operation. Mr. Anderson is actively involved in numerous economic development initiatives in the region including serving as the Chair of the Kansas City Area Development Council's Advanced Energy and Manufacturing Advisory Council. He received his undergraduate degree from Washington State University and his law degree from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (913) 234-7464 or by email at [email protected]. Britton Gibson Britton Gibson is a shareholder attorney in Polsinelli Shughart’s Energy Practice Group and has been responsible for more than $6 billion in energy-related transactions.
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012

    Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012

    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
  • Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
  • Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw Askance Nathaniel sometimes paddles any whine misapplies perennially. Lyndon still clangs mother-liquor while eloquent Emile euhemerized that tranquilization. Refined Agustin censors, his leapers stapled revile isometrically. Easements for market value in kansas, energy farm will. Probably choose renewable energy farm is per mw were primarily utilityscale wind farms are agreements being developed a windmill pump installed. Wind-rich states-North Dakota Texas and Kansas-could accomplish this. Nysted offshore farms much is per mw from empirical and kansas to. Installing and Maintaining a secure Wind Electric Energygov. Mw be a pilot agreement between sites that in mw than texas wind farm project uncertainty in efficiency in most per mw. Project various construction is FGE Power's 5004-MW Goodnight Wind Energy farm in Armstrong. Only a pilot? Unfortunately, its prominence often corresponded to its myriad challenges. The supply curves described earlier are based on switch type of transmission and the GIS optimization described here. What is OPC's position transfer the vessel Wind Project 14 A. Power development impacts on electricity market supported by analyzing its name from wind is wind industry would complicate wind. Involving affected remained opposed after random project was communities early is critical to identifying constructed. Mw marena renovables wind turbine setbacks from kathleen sebelius, nyiso system operations will be installed. Be pushed it might have. In AC electricity, the current flows in width direction from zero to a maximum voltage, then back afraid to zero, then sentence a maximum voltage in the plate direction. Kilowatt-hour MW megawatt NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory RPS.
  • Utily08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas

    Utily08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas

    UtilY08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 8 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 20 AES Cypress LLC 21 AES Shady Point LLC 23 A B Energy Inc 24 Nations Energy Holdings LLC 25 AES Greenidge 34 Abbeville City of Roger M Hall 35 AES WR Ltd Partnership 39 AES Hickling LLC 40 Hospira Inc 42 AES Thames LLC 46 AES Hoytdale LLC 52 ACE Cogeneration Co 54 Abitibi Consolidated 55 Aberdeen City of 56 Abitibi Consolidated Sale Corp 59 City of Abbeville Water & Light Plant 60 Acadia Bay Energy Co LLC 65 Abitibi Consolidated-Lufkin 82 Ada Cogeneration Ltd Partnership 84 A & N Electric Coop V N Brinkley 87 City of Ada 88 Granite Ridge Energy LLC 97 Adams Electric Coop 108 Adams-Columbia Electric Coop 109 Ag Processing Inc 113 Agway Energy Services, LLC 114 Addis Energy Center LLC 116 Agway Energy Services-PA Inc 118 Adams Rural Electric Coop, Inc 122 Village of Arcade 123 City of Adel 127 Aera Energy LLC 128 Adrian Energy Associates LLC 134 AES Eastern Energy LP 135 Agrilectric Power Partners Ltd 142 AES Beaver Valley 144 AEP Retail Energy LLC 146 AEI Resources 149 City of Afton 150 Adrian Public Utilities Comm Terry Miller 151 Adirondack Hydro-4 Branch LLC 154 AES Corp 155 Agralite Electric Coop Attn: R. Millett, Gen. Mgr. 156 AES Deepwater Inc 157 Town of Advance 162 Aiken Electric Coop Inc 163 AERA Energy LLC-Oxford 164 AERA Energy LLC 172 Ahlstrom Dexter LLC Page 1 UtilY08 174 Aitkin Public Utilities Comm Charles Tibbetts 176 Ajo Improvement Co 177 AES Hawaii Inc 178 AES Placerita Inc 179 Agrium US Inc 182 City of Akron 183 Village of Akron 189 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Jeff Parish 191 Alamo Power District No 3 192 Akiachak Native Community Electric Co 194 Albuquerque City of 195 Alabama Power Co Mike Craddock 197 Akron Thermal LP 198 City of Alton 201 City of Alachua 202 Town of Black Creek 204 Alabama Pine Pulp Co Inc 207 City of Alameda 211 Aetna Life & Casualty 212 AHA Macav Power Service 213 Alaska Electric Light&Power Co Attn Scott Willis 219 Alaska Power Co Attn Sheryl Dennis 220 Alaska Power Administration Attn.
  • Champaign-6-Palmer-Exhibits B-K.Pdf

    Champaign-6-Palmer-Exhibits B-K.Pdf

    BEFORE THE OHIO POWER SITING BOARD In the Matter of the Application of ) Champaign Wind LLC, for a Certificate ) to Construct a Wind-Powered Electric ) Case No. 12-0160-EL-BGN Generating Facility in Champaign ) County, Ohio ) EXHIBITS B TO K OF THE AMENDED DIRECT WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM PALMER, FILED ON BEHALF OF INTERVENORS UNION NEIGHBORS UNITED, INC., DIANE AND ROBERT McCONNELL, AND JULIA F. JOHNSON ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on November 6, 2012, a copy of this document was served by electronic mail on M. Howard Petricoff ([email protected]); Michael J. Settineri ([email protected]); Miranda Leppla ([email protected]); Chad Endsley ([email protected]); Nick Selvaggio ([email protected]); Jane Napier ([email protected]), Stephen Reilly ([email protected]), Devin Parram ([email protected]); Kurt P. Helfrich ([email protected]); Philip B. Sineneng ([email protected]); Ann B. Zallocco [email protected]); and G.S. Weithman ([email protected]). s/ Jack A. Van Kley___________________ Jack A. Van Kley EXHIBIT B-1 SANDIA REPORT SAND2011-1094 Unlimited Release Printed February 2011 Wind Turbine Composite Blade Manufacturing: The Need for Understanding Defect Origins, Prevalence, Implications and Reliability Douglas S. Cairns Trey Riddle Jared Nelson Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement

    Draft Environmental Impact Statement

    2019 Integrated Resource Plan VOLUME II - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Integrated Resource Plan Document Type: EIS – Administrative Record Index Field: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Project Name: Integrated Resource Plan Project Number: 2018-10 Draft Environmental Impact Statement: February 2019 Proposed action: Integrated Resource Plan Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority For further information on the EIS, contact: For further information on the project, contact: Ashley Pilakowski Hunter Hydas NEPA Specialist IRP Project Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 400 W. Summit Hill Drive 1101 Market Street Knoxville, TN 37902 Chattanooga, TN 37402 Phone: 865-632-2256 Phone: 423-751-2453 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract: The 2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is a long-term plan that provides direction on how TVA can best meet future demand for power. It will shape how TVA provides low-cost, reliable electricity; supports environmental stewardship; and fosters economic development in the Tennessee Valley for the next 20 years. TVA’s IRP is based upon a “scenario” planning approach that provides an understanding of how future decisions would play out in future scenarios. A wide variety of resource options and business strategies are considered in this IRP. TVA identified six scenarios: (1) The Current Outlook, (2) Economic Downturn, (3) Valley Load Growth, (4) Decarbonization, (5) Rapid Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Adoption, and (6) No Nuclear Extensions. Five planning strategies were evaluated against the backdrop of these scenarios: (A) Base Case, (B) Promote Distributed Energy Resources (DER), (C) Promote Resiliency, (D) Promote Efficient Load Shape and (E) Promote Renewables.
  • Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry

    Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry

    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry https://marketpublishers.com/r/A2BBD5C7FFBEN.html Date: June 2011 Pages: 230 Price: US$ 300.00 (Single User License) ID: A2BBD5C7FFBEN Abstracts The rise of wind energy is no longer being looked upon as an alternate source of energy. The United States is a leader in the field of wind energy and the US in 2010 was the second largest user of wind energy in the world, just behind China. In fact, the US had over 40,000 megawatts of installed capacity of wind power by the end of 2010. Aruvian’s R’search presents an analysis of the US Wind Power Industry in its research report Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry. In this research offering, we carry out an in-depth analysis of the wind power market in the United States. We begin with an analysis of the market profile, market statistics, wind power generation by state, installed capacity growth, analysis of wind resources in the US, and many other points that are important for investors looking to invest in the US wind power sector. This report also undertakes a cost analysis of wind power in the US, along with an analysis of the major market trends and challenges facing the industry. The small wind turbines market in the US is analyzed comprehensively in this report as well and includes a market profile, market statistics, the emergence and importance of hybrid small wind turbines, very small wind turbines, wind-diesel hybrid turbine systems, and the economics of small wind turbines.
  • MAYAKI Ezekiel Asuku.Pdf

    MAYAKI Ezekiel Asuku.Pdf

    MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE APPROPRIATE OFFSHORE WIND FARM LOCATION IN NIGERIA Energy sustainability requires meeting our energy needs upon which economic development depends. The need to improve on the present power generating capacity of Nigeria, has brought about energy diversification by increasing the present energy sources to include renewable resources and this has led to the idea of this work. This work is aimed at determining the appropriate offshore wind farm location(s) in Nigeria to address the issue of wind energy availability and utilization in the country. Attributes for offshore wind farm location were collected for three Alternatives in Nigeria which are Victoria Island in Lagos, Koko offshore region of Warri and Abbonema of Port-Hacourt. Wind speeds data were collected from the Nigeria Metrological (NIMET) stations in the states under consideration while other required attributes were collected with the use of a Questionnaire which was responded to by professionals. Collected data were analyzed using fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria analysis tool. Average of a ten years wind speed for Lagos, Warri and Port-Harcourt were 6.251m/s, 7.294m/s and 7.347m/s respectively. Analytic Hierarchy Process gave a Consistency Index of 0.1230 and Consistency Ratio of 0.0843. The consistency ratio from the AHP was used to calculate the required Criteria Weight (Cw) for the fuzzy TOPSIS analysis. The results from the TOPSIS analysis showed that Lagos showed a greater advantage over the two other alternatives been considered. Finally, from the cummulative value of the analyzed attributes, Victoria Island (Lagos) has the highest figure of 233.6677 with a consideration rate of 38% and this places it above Koko (Warri) and Abonnema (Port-Harcourt) with a value of 187.7704 (30%) and 195.4378 (32%).

  • A List of Displayed Operational Power Plants

    Better Data for Better Decisions Order this map online at www.mapsearch.com/electricmap The 2012 US Power Industry Wall Map Displays the Following Operational Power Plants (50 MW and above): 491 E 48th Street Alta Wind V Astoria Benton County 5 AC Altamont Pass Astoria Energy LLC Bergen 500MW CC Altavista Astoria GT Berkshire Power Co LLC A B Brown AMEA Peaking Athens Bethlehem A B Paterson American Falls Attala Bethlehem A L Pierce American Ref-Fuel DE Valley Auburndale Peaker Bethpage Abilene CT American Ref-Fuel of Niagara Auburndale Power Partners Big Bend Acadia Power Partners Ames Electric Services Audrain Big Bend ACE Cogeneration Co Ames GT Aurora Big Brown Adair Amistad Dam & Power Avon Lake Big Cajun 1 AEP Waterford Anadarko Plant Avon Park Big Cajun 2 AES Placerita Inc Anclote B C Cobb Big Creek 1 AES Alamitos LLC Anderson B L England Big Creek 2 AES Beaver Valley Partners Androscoggin Baconton Power LLC Big Creek 2A Beaver Valley Androscoggin Mill Bad Creek Big Creek 3 AES Cayuga LLC Angus Anson Bailly Big Creek 4 AES Huntington Beach LLC Animas Bainbridge Big Creek 8 AES Ironwood LLC ANP Bellingham Energy Com- Balch 2 Big Horn AES Petersburg pany LLC Baldwin Energy Complex Big Horn Wind II AES Red Oak LLC ANP Blackstone Energy Com- Baldwin Wind LLC Big Sandy AES Redondo Beach LLC pany LLC Barkley Big Sandy Peaker Plant LLC AES Shady Point LLC Anson County Barney M Davis Big Stone AES Somerset LLC Antelope Valley Barry Biglow Canyon AES Thames LLC Apache Bartletts Ferry Birchwood Power Partners LP AES Warrior Run Cogen Apalachia
  • Annual Economic Impacts of Kansas Wind Energy 2020

    Annual Economic Impacts of Kansas Wind Energy 2020

    ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF KANSAS WIND ENERGY 2020 REPORT RELEASED MARCH 22, 2021 Prepared By: Alan Claus Anderson Luke Hagedorn Polsinelli, Vice Chair, Polsinelli, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group Energy Practice Group Andrew Schulte Polsinelli, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group ABOUT THE AUTHORS Alan Claus Anderson Alan Claus Anderson is a Shareholder and Vice Chair of Polsinelli's national Energy Practice Group. Mr. Anderson represents renewable energy developers in projects throughout the country, representing clients in more than 5,000 MW in operating wind and solar projects. Mr. Anderson is an adjunct professor of law at the University of Kansas School of Law, teaching Renewable Energy Law, Practice and Policy. Mr. Anderson has also served as the Chair of the Kansas City Area Development Council's Advanced Energy and Manufacturing Advisory Council, Chair of the Government Team for the United States Department of Energy Electrify the Heartland Project, and the Solar Finance Lead for the Department of Energy’s Solar Ready KC Sunshot initiative. He received his undergraduate degree from Washington State University and his law degree from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (816) 572-4761 or by email at [email protected]. Luke Hagedorn Luke Hagedorn is a shareholder attorney in the Polsinelli law firm's Energy Practice Group. Mr. Hagedorn’s practice focuses on assisting public utilities, energy industry organizations, and renewable developers on a number of complex legal issues related to transactional matters and state and federal regulatory compliance. He also helps renewable energy developers navigate a broad range of complex legal issues arising out of the development of renewable resources.