DOCSLIB.ORG

Patrick J. Heaton, RPA Principal, Cultural Resources Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Patrick J. Heaton, RPA Principal, Cultural Resources Services Patrick J. Heaton, RPA Principal, Cultural Resources Services Patrick Heaton is a Principal and the Director of Cultural Resources at EDR. He is a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with more than 20 years of experience managing cultural resources (i.e., archaeological and historic sites) compliance, environmental permitting, and historic preservation projects, and meets the Qualifications for the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (per 36 CFR 61). His technical expertise includes archaeology, cultural resources management, visual impact assessment, and environmental permitting compliance and strategy, including State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and Tribal consultation, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). As Director of Cultural Resources, Patrick oversees cultural resources surveys, archaeological investigations, historic preservation planning projects, and develops avoidance and/or mitigation strategies for archaeological sites and historic properties. Mr. Heaton has significant experience with transportation, energy transmission, and utility-scale renewable energy (wind and solar) projects in New York, New England, Ohio, and Maryland. education employment history Master of Arts, Anthropology, New York University, 1999. Principal, Director of Cultural Resources Services, Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering and Environmental Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology, Hartwick College, 1994. Services, D.P.C., Syracuse, NY, 2013-present. registration / certifications Project Manager, Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering and Environmental Services, D.P.C., Syracuse, Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), 2000. NY, 2010-2013. Meets the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Archaeology and Historic Associate, Principal Archaeologist, and Project Manager, John Milner Preservation (36 CFR Part 61). Associates, Inc., Croton-on-Hudson, NY, 2004-2010. professional affiliations Project Archaeologist, John Milner Associates, Inc., Croton-on-Hudson, NY, 2000-2004. Board of Directors, Onondaga Historical Association, 2019-present Graduate Teaching Assistant, Anthropology Department, New York Board of Directors, New York Archaeological Council, 2018-present. University, New York, NY, 1997-2000. Member, Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology. Research Consultant, Sass Conservation, Inc., Yonkers, NY, 1998-2000. Member, New York State Archaeological Association (NYSAA). Field Archaeologist, Various Firms, NY, RI, MA, PA, CT, 1995-1999. Vice-President, Board of Directors (2014-2016), Preservation Association of Central New York (PACNY). Village of Fayetteville Historic Preservation Commission (2010-2014). Executive Board (2006-2007), Professional Archaeologists of New York City (PANYC). project experience Mohawk Solar, Montgomery County, NY- Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for environmental permitting studies for a proposed 90 MW solar energy facility, the first solar project to pursue a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need under Article 10 of the New York State Public Service Law (NYSPSC Case No. 17-F-0182). Services have included preparation of a Public Involvement Program Plan, Preliminary Scoping Statement, Article 10 Application, GIS data management and mapping, archaeological and historic resources surveys, wetland delineation, threatened and endangered species habitat assessment, avian surveys, agricultural land use analysis, socioeconomic analysis, visual impact assessment, visual mitigation planting plan, public outreach support, stakeholder engagement, agency consultation, and Public Service Commission Siting Board testimony. Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering, & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 1 www.edrdpc.com PJH-PF1 Page 1 of 9 Patrick J. Heaton, RPA Principal, Cultural Resources Services Sunrise Wind, Visual and Cultural Resources Assessment, Offshore DE- Principal-in-Charge for an historic resources visual effects analysis and visual impact assessment in support of the Constructions and Operations Plan (COP) for a proposed 880-MW offshore wind farm located off the coast of Southern New England. EDR’s services also include an onshore archeological survey, historic resources, survey, and visual resources assessment in support of a New York State Public Service Commission Article VII Application for the onshore interconnection cable route and substation located in Suffolk County (Long Island), New York. As part of a consultant team with Stantec for Orsted, provided technical oversight and QA/QC for technical analyses and reports, consultation with relevant state and federal agencies, and client/team coordination. Flint Mine Solar, Greene County, NY- Principal-in-Charge for environmental permitting studies for proposed 100 MW solar energy facility pursuing a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need under Article 10 of the New York State Public Service Law (NYSPSC Case No. 18-F-0087). Services have included preparation of an environmental permitting Critical Issues Analysis, siting design support, assistance with Public Involvement Program Plan, preparation of a Preliminary Scoping Statement, preparation of the Article 10 Application, Phase IA and IB archaeological investigation, SHPO consultation, wetland delineation, threatened/endangered species habitat assessment, socioeconomic analysis, visual impact assessment, visual mitigation planting plan, public outreach, stakeholder engagement, regulatory agency consultation, and Public Service Commission Siting Board testimony. Bluestone Wind Farm, Broome County, NY- Technical oversight for archaeological survey, historic resources survey and effects analysis, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation, cultural resources mitigation, and Siting Board testimony in support of Article 10 Application to the New York State Board on Electrical Generating Siting and the Environment (NYSPSC Case No. 16-F-0559) for a proposed 124 MW wind energy facility. Skipjack Wind Farm, Visual and Historic Resources Assessment, Offshore DE- Principal-in-Charge for an historic resources visual effects analysis and visual impact assessment in support of the Constructions and Operations Plan (COP) for a proposed 120-MW offshore wind farm located off the coast of Delaware and Maryland. As part of a consultant team with Stantec for Orsted, provided technical oversight and QA/QC for technical analyses and reports, consultation with relevant state and federal agencies, and client/team coordination. South Fork Export Cable, On-shore Transmission Line & Substation Facilities, Suffolk County, NY- Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation, Phase I archaeological survey, historic-architectural resources survey, and Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) as part of consultant team with AECOM in support of an New York State Public Service Law Article VII application (NYSPSC Case No. 18-T-0604) for a 138kV underground transmission line and new substation associated with a proposed 90-MW offshore wind energy project. South Fork Wind Farm, Outer Continental Shelf, Rhode Island-Massachusetts Wind Energy Lease Area- Provided technical oversight for historic resources visual effects analysis and terrestrial archaeological assessments in support of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) review for a proposed 90-MW offshore wind energy project. High Bridge Wind Farm, Chenango County, NY- Technical oversight for archaeological survey, historic resources survey and effects analysis, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation, cultural resources mitigation, and Siting Board testimony in support of Article 10 Application to the New York State Board on Electrical Generating Siting and the Environment (NYSPSC Case No. 18-F-0262) for a proposed 100 MW wind energy facility. Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Greene County, NY- Principal-in-Charge for a Phase I-III archaeological site investigation and data recovery, wetland delineations, wetland permitting, threatened and endangered species surveys, Incidental Take Permit, and preparation of a habitat conservation plan for a proposed 8-acre Training Facility. Directed archaeological field investigations, artifact analysis, and technical report for a Pre-Contact Native American archaeological site resulting in the recovery of approximately 7,000 artifacts. On behalf of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) and Office of General Services (OGS), coordinated agency and stakeholder consultation pursuant to Section 14.09 of the New York State Historic Preservation Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act with the New York State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Environmental Conservation, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohican Indians, and Delaware Nation. Interstate 81 (I-81) Viaduct Project (NYSDOT PIN 3501.60), Archaeological Assessment, City of Syracuse, Onondaga County, NY- Managed the Phase IA Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment and Phase IB shovel testing survey conducted to help support Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act consultation and National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy
    THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF KANSAS WIND ENERGY NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Prepared By: Alan Claus Anderson Britton Gibson Polsinelli Shughart, Vice Chair, Polsinelli Shughart, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group Energy Practice Group Scott W. White, Ph.D. Luke Hagedorn Founder, Polsinelli Shughart, Associate, Kansas Energy Information Network Energy Practice Group ABOUT THE AUTHORS Alan Claus Anderson Alan Claus Anderson is a shareholder attorney and the Vice Chair of Polsinelli Shughart's Energy Practice Group. He has extensive experience representing and serving as lead counsel and outside general counsel to public and private domestic and international companies in the energy industry. He was selected for membership in the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators and has led numerous successful oil and gas acquisitions and joint development projects domestically and internationally. Mr. Anderson also represents developers, lenders, investors and suppliers in renewable energy projects throughout the country that represent more than 3,500 MW in wind and solar projects under development and more than $2 billion in wind and solar projects in operation. Mr. Anderson is actively involved in numerous economic development initiatives in the region including serving as the Chair of the Kansas City Area Development Council's Advanced Energy and Manufacturing Advisory Council. He received his undergraduate degree from Washington State University and his law degree from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (913) 234-7464 or by email at [email protected]. Britton Gibson Britton Gibson is a shareholder attorney in Polsinelli Shughart’s Energy Practice Group and has been responsible for more than $6 billion in energy-related transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule MPS-1 Page 1 of 9
    Grain Belt Express Clean Line Additional Information on Qualifications and Experience of Selected Clean Line Management Team Members and Employees Michael Skelly President and CEO Horizon Wind Energy – Chief Development Officer . Built and developed over 2,600 MW of electric projects, including: Blue Canyon V Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Pine Tree Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rail Splitter Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rattlesnake Road Wind Farm, Twin Groves II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Meridian Way I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star II Wind Farm, Pioneer Prairie I & II Wind Farm, Prairie Star Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Twin Groves I Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star I Wind Farm, Elkhorn Wind Farm, Maple Ridge I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Wild Horse Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Blue Canyon I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Mill Run Wind Farm, Somerset Wind Farm, Top of Iowa Wind Farm, Madison Wind Farm, Tierras Morenas Wind Farm. Participated in construction supervision, onsite inspections, the review of quality assurance/quality control procedures, the implementation of safety strategies, and resolving logistical issues of wind farms and generation tie lines. Responsible for purchasing equipment from wind turbine manufacturers. Responsible for negotiating EPC contracts for both equipment and construction, hiring construction supervision teams, negotiating balance of plant contracts for the turbine equipment, and performing development activities, including land acquisition, permitting, and turbine siting. Wayne Galli, Ph.D, P.E. Executive Vice President, Transmission and Technical Services NextEra Energy Resources – Director, Transmission Development ▪ Responsible for routing, siting and engineering for approximately 330 miles of new transmission lines, including HVDC lines for the CREZ Transmission Projects in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw
    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw Askance Nathaniel sometimes paddles any whine misapplies perennially. Lyndon still clangs mother-liquor while eloquent Emile euhemerized that tranquilization. Refined Agustin censors, his leapers stapled revile isometrically. Easements for market value in kansas, energy farm will. Probably choose renewable energy farm is per mw were primarily utilityscale wind farms are agreements being developed a windmill pump installed. Wind-rich states-North Dakota Texas and Kansas-could accomplish this. Nysted offshore farms much is per mw from empirical and kansas to. Installing and Maintaining a secure Wind Electric Energygov. Mw be a pilot agreement between sites that in mw than texas wind farm project uncertainty in efficiency in most per mw. Project various construction is FGE Power's 5004-MW Goodnight Wind Energy farm in Armstrong. Only a pilot? Unfortunately, its prominence often corresponded to its myriad challenges. The supply curves described earlier are based on switch type of transmission and the GIS optimization described here. What is OPC's position transfer the vessel Wind Project 14 A. Power development impacts on electricity market supported by analyzing its name from wind is wind industry would complicate wind. Involving affected remained opposed after random project was communities early is critical to identifying constructed. Mw marena renovables wind turbine setbacks from kathleen sebelius, nyiso system operations will be installed. Be pushed it might have. In AC electricity, the current flows in width direction from zero to a maximum voltage, then back afraid to zero, then sentence a maximum voltage in the plate direction. Kilowatt-hour MW megawatt NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory RPS.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Power Plants and the Environment (Ceir-19)
    PPRP – CEIR-19 DNR Publication No. 12-102920-260 Maryland Power Plants and the Environment A review of the impacts of power plants and transmission lines on Maryland's natural resources December 2017 Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Governor u Boyd K. Rutherford, Lt. Governor The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seeks to preserve, protect and enhance the living resources of the state. Working in partnership with the citizens of Maryland, this worthwhile goal will become a reality. This publication provides information that will increase your understanding of how DNR strives to reach that goal through its many diverse programs. Mark J. Belton, Secretary Maryland Department of Natural Resources The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with a disability. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401-2397 Toll Free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR x8660 Outside Maryland: 1-410-260-8660 TTY users call via the Maryland Relay www.dnr.maryland.gov Printed on Recycled Paper PPRP – CEIR – 19 DNR Publication No. 12-102920-260 Maryland Power Plants and the Environment A review of the impacts of power plants and transmission lines on Maryland's natural resources December 2017 MARYLAND POWER PLANTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CEIR-19) Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Role of PPRP ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Power Plant and Transmission Line Licensing ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Reporting Requirements
    www.pse.com Puget Sound Energy, Inc. P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 Filed via Web Portal May 31, 2018 Mr. Mark L. Johnson, Executive Director and Secretary Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission 1300 South Evergreen Park Drive S.W. P.O. Box 47250 Olympia, WA 98504-7250 Re: Annual Renewable Portfolio Standard Report - 2018 RCW-Required Report, RCW 19.285.070 and WAC-Required Report, WAC 480-109-210 Dear Mr. Johnson: Attached for filing, please find Puget Sound Energy’s (“PSE’s”) report detailing the annual reporting requirements for the Renewable Portfolio Standard Report (the “Report”) in RCW 19.285.070 and WAC 480-109-210. PSE is asking the Commission to approve its 2018 Renewable Energy Target of 1,879,417 MWh. PSE requests confidential treatment for Attachments 4 and 5 to the Report under RCW 80.04.095 and in accordance with WAC 480-07-160. The information labeled as confidential includes commercially sensitive data and confidential information related to renewable energy credit purchases and sales revenues, which could expose PSE to competitive injury if disclosure is unrestricted. Therefore, PSE requests confidential treatment on the basis that the information labeled confidential contains “valuable commercial information, including trade secrets or confidential marketing, cost, or financial information, or customer-specific usage and network configuration and design information,” as provided in in RCW 80.04.095 in accordance with WAC 480-07-160(2)(c). A copy of this report will also be submitted to the Department of Commerce. Mr. Mark L. Johnson May 31, 2018 Page 2 If you have any questions about the information contained in this filing, please contact Katherine Barnard, Director, Revenue Requirement & Compliance, at (425) 462-3716 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Wind and Solar PV Financing DE-AC36-99-GO10337
    A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Innovations in Wind and Technical Report NREL/TP-670-42919 Solar PV Financing February 2008 K. Cory, J. Coughlin, and T. Jenkin National Renewable Energy Laboratory J. Pater Summit Blue B. Swezey Applied Materials NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Innovations in Wind and Technical Report NREL/TP-670-42919 Solar PV Financing February 2008 K. Cory, J. Coughlin, and T. Jenkin National Renewable Energy Laboratory J. Pater Summit Blue B. Swezey Applied Materials Prepared under Task No. ASA6.2004 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Utily08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas
    UtilY08 UTILCODE UTILNAME ATTN 7 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 8 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc 20 AES Cypress LLC 21 AES Shady Point LLC 23 A B Energy Inc 24 Nations Energy Holdings LLC 25 AES Greenidge 34 Abbeville City of Roger M Hall 35 AES WR Ltd Partnership 39 AES Hickling LLC 40 Hospira Inc 42 AES Thames LLC 46 AES Hoytdale LLC 52 ACE Cogeneration Co 54 Abitibi Consolidated 55 Aberdeen City of 56 Abitibi Consolidated Sale Corp 59 City of Abbeville Water & Light Plant 60 Acadia Bay Energy Co LLC 65 Abitibi Consolidated-Lufkin 82 Ada Cogeneration Ltd Partnership 84 A & N Electric Coop V N Brinkley 87 City of Ada 88 Granite Ridge Energy LLC 97 Adams Electric Coop 108 Adams-Columbia Electric Coop 109 Ag Processing Inc 113 Agway Energy Services, LLC 114 Addis Energy Center LLC 116 Agway Energy Services-PA Inc 118 Adams Rural Electric Coop, Inc 122 Village of Arcade 123 City of Adel 127 Aera Energy LLC 128 Adrian Energy Associates LLC 134 AES Eastern Energy LP 135 Agrilectric Power Partners Ltd 142 AES Beaver Valley 144 AEP Retail Energy LLC 146 AEI Resources 149 City of Afton 150 Adrian Public Utilities Comm Terry Miller 151 Adirondack Hydro-4 Branch LLC 154 AES Corp 155 Agralite Electric Coop Attn: R. Millett, Gen. Mgr. 156 AES Deepwater Inc 157 Town of Advance 162 Aiken Electric Coop Inc 163 AERA Energy LLC-Oxford 164 AERA Energy LLC 172 Ahlstrom Dexter LLC Page 1 UtilY08 174 Aitkin Public Utilities Comm Charles Tibbetts 176 Ajo Improvement Co 177 AES Hawaii Inc 178 AES Placerita Inc 179 Agrium US Inc 182 City of Akron 183 Village of Akron 189 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Jeff Parish 191 Alamo Power District No 3 192 Akiachak Native Community Electric Co 194 Albuquerque City of 195 Alabama Power Co Mike Craddock 197 Akron Thermal LP 198 City of Alton 201 City of Alachua 202 Town of Black Creek 204 Alabama Pine Pulp Co Inc 207 City of Alameda 211 Aetna Life & Casualty 212 AHA Macav Power Service 213 Alaska Electric Light&Power Co Attn Scott Willis 219 Alaska Power Co Attn Sheryl Dennis 220 Alaska Power Administration Attn.
    [Show full text]
  • QUALIFICATIONS and EXPERIENCE of CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS' MANAGEMENT TEAM Michael Skelly – President and CEO Michael
    QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS’ MANAGEMENT TEAM Michael Skelly – President and CEO Michael Skelly has been in the energy business for over 20 years. He led the development of Horizon Wind Energy (“Horizon”) from a two-man company to one of the largest renewable energy companies in the country. Under his leadership, Horizon built and developed over 2,600 MW of electric projects, including: Blue Canyon V Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Pine Tree Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rail Splitter Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rattlesnake Road Wind Farm, Twin Groves II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Meridian Way I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star II Wind Farm, Pioneer Prairie I & II Wind Farm, Prairie Star Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Twin Groves I Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star I Wind Farm, Elkhorn Wind Farm, Maple Ridge I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Wild Horse Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Blue Canyon I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Mill Run Wind Farm, Somerset Wind Farm, Top of Iowa Wind Farm, Madison Wind Farm, Tierras Morenas Wind Farm. While at Horizon, Mr. Skelly participated in construction supervision, onsite inspections, review of quality assurance/quality control procedures, implementation of safety strategies, and resolving logistical issues of wind farms and generation tie lines. He was also responsible for purchasing equipment from wind turbine manufacturers and for negotiating EPC contracts for both equipment and construction, hiring construction supervision teams, negotiating balance of plant contracts for the turbine equipment, and performing development activities, including land acquisition, permitting, and turbine siting.
    [Show full text]
  • Champaign-6-Palmer-Exhibits B-K.Pdf
    BEFORE THE OHIO POWER SITING BOARD In the Matter of the Application of ) Champaign Wind LLC, for a Certificate ) to Construct a Wind-Powered Electric ) Case No. 12-0160-EL-BGN Generating Facility in Champaign ) County, Ohio ) EXHIBITS B TO K OF THE AMENDED DIRECT WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM PALMER, FILED ON BEHALF OF INTERVENORS UNION NEIGHBORS UNITED, INC., DIANE AND ROBERT McCONNELL, AND JULIA F. JOHNSON ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on November 6, 2012, a copy of this document was served by electronic mail on M. Howard Petricoff ([email protected]); Michael J. Settineri ([email protected]); Miranda Leppla ([email protected]); Chad Endsley ([email protected]); Nick Selvaggio ([email protected]); Jane Napier ([email protected]), Stephen Reilly ([email protected]), Devin Parram ([email protected]); Kurt P. Helfrich ([email protected]); Philip B. Sineneng ([email protected]); Ann B. Zallocco [email protected]); and G.S. Weithman ([email protected]). s/ Jack A. Van Kley___________________ Jack A. Van Kley EXHIBIT B-1 SANDIA REPORT SAND2011-1094 Unlimited Release Printed February 2011 Wind Turbine Composite Blade Manufacturing: The Need for Understanding Defect Origins, Prevalence, Implications and Reliability Douglas S. Cairns Trey Riddle Jared Nelson Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
    [Show full text]