DOCSLIB.ORG

A List of Displayed Operational Power Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Better Data for Better Decisions Order this map online at www.mapsearch.com/electricmap The 2012 US Power Industry Wall Map Displays the Following Operational Power Plants (50 MW and above): 491 E 48th Street Alta Wind V Astoria Benton County 5 AC Altamont Pass Astoria Energy LLC Bergen 500MW CC Altavista Astoria GT Berkshire Power Co LLC A B Brown AMEA Peaking Athens Bethlehem A B Paterson American Falls Attala Bethlehem A L Pierce American Ref-Fuel DE Valley Auburndale Peaker Bethpage Abilene CT American Ref-Fuel of Niagara Auburndale Power Partners Big Bend Acadia Power Partners Ames Electric Services Audrain Big Bend ACE Cogeneration Co Ames GT Aurora Big Brown Adair Amistad Dam & Power Avon Lake Big Cajun 1 AEP Waterford Anadarko Plant Avon Park Big Cajun 2 AES Placerita Inc Anclote B C Cobb Big Creek 1 AES Alamitos LLC Anderson B L England Big Creek 2 AES Beaver Valley Partners Androscoggin Baconton Power LLC Big Creek 2A Beaver Valley Androscoggin Mill Bad Creek Big Creek 3 AES Cayuga LLC Angus Anson Bailly Big Creek 4 AES Huntington Beach LLC Animas Bainbridge Big Creek 8 AES Ironwood LLC ANP Bellingham Energy Com- Balch 2 Big Horn AES Petersburg pany LLC Baldwin Energy Complex Big Horn Wind II AES Red Oak LLC ANP Blackstone Energy Com- Baldwin Wind LLC Big Sandy AES Redondo Beach LLC pany LLC Barkley Big Sandy Peaker Plant LLC AES Shady Point LLC Anson County Barney M Davis Big Stone AES Somerset LLC Antelope Valley Barry Biglow Canyon AES Thames LLC Apache Bartletts Ferry Birchwood Power Partners LP AES Warrior Run Cogen Apalachia Barton Chapel Biron Mill AES Westover LLC Apex Barton Windpower LLC Bison I Afton Aragonne Wind LLC BASF Freeport Works Black Dog Agency GT Arapahoe Basin Creek Power Services LLC Black Hawk Agua Fria Arapahoe CT Bastrop Energy Partners, LP Black Mountain Agua Mansa Archbald Batavia Black River Generation LLC Ainsworth Archer Daniels Midland - Co- Batesville Blackhawk Air Products Port Arthur lumbus Bath County Blackstone Wind Farm LLC Alabama Pine Pulp Co Inc Archer Daniels Midland Cedar Baxter Wilson Blakely Mountain Alameda Rapids Bay Front Blenheim Gilboa Alamosa Archer Daniels Midland Clinton Bay Shore Blewett Albany Paper Mill Archer Daniels Midland Decatur Bayboro Bliss Albright Archer Daniels Midland Peoria Bayonne Cogen Plant Blount Street Alder Archer Daniels Midland South- Bayou Cogen Plant Blue Canyon Windpower II LLC Algonquin Windsor Locks LLC port Bayou Cove Peaking Power Blue Canyon Windpower LLC Allatoona Argus Cogen Bayswater Peaking Facility LLC Blue Canyon Windpower V LLC Allegany Cogen Arkansas Nuclear One Baytown Blue Lake Allegheny Energy Units 1 & 2 Arlington Valley Bear Garden Blue Mesa Allegheny Energy Units 12 & 13 Arlington Wind Power Project Bear Swamp Blue Sky Green Field Allegheny Energy Units 3 4 & 5 LLC Beatrice Blue Spruce Energy Center LLC Allegheny Energy Units 8 & 9 Armenia Mountain Beaver Blue Valley Allegheny Ridge Armstrong Beaver Bluegrass Generation Co LLC Allen S King Armstrong Beaver Valley Bluffview Allen Steam Arsenal Hill Belden Blundell Alliant Energy Neenah Arthur Kill Belews Creek Blythe Energy LLC Alma Arthur Von Rosenberg Belle River Boardman Almond Arvah B Hopkins Bellingham Cogen Bonanza Alsey Asbury Bellmeade Bonneville Alta Wind I Ashdown Ben French Boone Dam Alta Wind II Asheville Bennett Mountain Bosque County Peaking Alta Wind III Ashtabula Benning Bottle Rock Power LLC Alta Wind IV Ashtabula Wind II LLC Bent Tree Phase 1 Boundary Better Data for Better Decisions Order this map online at www.mapsearch.com/electricmap Bowater Newsprint Calhoun Cabot Cedar City of Columbia Ops Caithness Dixie Valley Cedar Bay Generating Company City of Higginsville Bowen Caithness Long Island, LLC LP City of Lamar Bowline Point Calcasieu Cedar Bayou City of Logansport Box Canyon Calderwood Cedar Bayou 4 City of Marshall Braidwood Caledonia Cedar Creek City of Orrville Brame Calhoun Power Co LLC Cedar Creek II City of Painesville Brandon Shores Calistoga Cedar Point LLC City of Redding Brandy Branch Callahan Divide Cedar Ridge City of Riverside Brawley 1 Callaway Cedro Hill Wind LLC City of Roseville Brayton Point Calumet Energy Team LLC Celanese City of Sikeston Brazos Calvert Cliffs Nuclear PP Inc Centennial City of Vero Beach Brazos Valley Energy Cambria CoGen Co Center Hill City Water Light Plant City of Bremo Bluff Cambridge CT Centerville Jonesboro Bridgeport Camden Cogen LP Central Energy Plant Clarence Cannon Bridgeport Energy LLC Cameo Central Plains Clark Broad River Cameron Ridge LLC Central Power & Lime Inc Clay Boswell Broadway Camino Century Claytor Broadway Camp Grove Ceredo Clear Lake Cogeneration LP Broken Bow Camp Springs CFB Clearwater Paper IPP Lewiston Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogen PLP Campbell Hill Windpower CH Resources Beaver Falls Cleary Flood Brownlee Canaday CH Resources Syracuse Clewiston Sugar House Browns Ferry Canadys Steam Chalk Point LLC Cliffside Brownsville Peaking Canal Chambers Cogeneration LP Clifton Bruce Mansfield Canandaigua Power Partners Chamois Clifty Creek Brunot Island LLC Champion Wind Farm LLC Clinch River Brunswick Cane Island Chanarambie Power Partners, Clinton Brunswick Cellulose Inc Cane Run LLC Clover Bryan Caney River Channel Energy Center Coachella BTEC New Albany LLC Cannon Falls Channelview Cogen Coal Creek BTEC Southaven LLC Canton North Carolina Chanute 2 Cochrane Buchanan Cape Canaveral Charles City Coffeen Buchanan Generation LLC Cape Fear Charles Poletti Coffeyville Buck Capital District Charles R Lowman Cogen South Buckeye Florida Ltd Partners Capricorn Ridge Wind LLC Chattahoochee Colbert Bucks Creek Caprock Chehalis Coleto Creek Power LP Buffalo Gap Carbon Chelan Colgate Buffalo Gap 3 Cardinal Cogen Inc Cheoah Collierville Powerhouse Buffalo Gap II Cardinal Operating Co Cherokee Collin Buffalo Ridge I LLC Caribou 1 Cherokee County Cogen Colorado Bend Buford Caribou 2 Cherokee Dam Colorado Green Holdings LLC Bull Creek Wind LLC Carl Bailey Chesapeake Colorado Power Partners Bull Run Carlls Corner Chester Colstrip Bull Shoals Carmen Smith Chester Operations Columbia Burlington Carpenter Chesterfield Columbia Burlington Carr Street Generating Sta LP Cheswick Columbia Energy LLC Burns Harbor Plant Carroll Chevron Oil Colusa Butler Ridge Wind Energy Carson Cogeneration Co Chickamauga Colver Center Carson Ice-Gen Project Chief Joseph Comanche Butler-Warner Carters Chillicothe Municipal Utils Comanche Buzzard Point Carthage Energy LLC Chino Mines Comanche Peak Buzzard Roost Carville Energy LLC Chocolate Bayou Plant Combined Locks Byron Cascade Creek Choctaw County Comerford C D McIntosh Jr Cass County Choctaw Gas Generating Pro Commonwealth Atlantic LP C J Strike Castaic LLC Commonwealth Chesapeake C P Crane Castleton Cholla Co LLC C R Huntley Catalyst Paper Inc. - Snowflake Chouteau Concord C R Wing Cogen Plant Mill Christiana Conemaugh C W Burdick Catawba Chuck Lenzie Conesville Cabin Creek Cayuga Cimarron River Conners Creek Cabinet Gorge Cecil Lynch CITGO Petroleum Corp Connersville Better Data for Better Decisions Order this map online at www.mapsearch.com/electricmap ConocoPhillips Rodeo Refinery Dale Don Pedro El Dorado Energy Conowingo Dale Hollow Donald C Cook El Segundo Cogen Contra Costa Dallman Donald Von Raesfeld El Segundo Power Coolwater Dam 2 Donnells Elbow Creek Wind Project LLC Cooper Dan E Karn Doswell Electra Cooper Dan River Douglas Dam Electrifarm Cope Dansby Dow Chemical Co - St Charles Elgin Copper Danskammer Dow Chemical Texas Operation Elk City LLC Coralville GT Darby Electric Doyle I LLC Elk Hills Power LLC Cordell Hull Darbytown Dresden Elk Mound Cordova Energy Co LLC Dardanelle Drum 2 Elk River Corn Products Illinois Darlington County Dry Fork Elk River Coronado Dartmouth Power Associates Dry Lake Elkhorn Ridge Wind LLC Corpus Christi Cogeneration LP Dave Johnston DTE East China LLC Elkhorn Valley Corpus Refinery Davis Besse Duane Arnold Elkins Cos Cob Davis Dam Dubuque Ellwood Coso Energy Developers Day County Wind LLC Duck Creek Elm Creek Wind LLC Coso Finance Partners De Pere Dunkirk Power LLC Elm Road Coso Power Developers Dean H Mitchell Dunlap Elmer Smith Cosumnes Dearborn Industrial Gen Inc Dworshak Elrama Cottonwood Energy Co LP DeBary Dynegy Morro Bay LLC Elwood Energy LLC Covanta Essex Company Decatur Dynegy -Moss Landing LLC Emery Covanta Fairfax Energy Decker Creek Dynegy Oakland, LLC Empire Covanta Hempstead DeCordova Steam Dynegy South Bay LLC Empire Generating Co LLC Covanta Mid-Connecticut Deepwater E B Harris Emporia Energy Deer Island Treatment Plant E C Gaston Encina Covington Deer Park Energy Center E D Edwards Encogen Cow Branch Wind Power LLC Deerhaven E F Barrett Endicott Cowans Ford Degray E J Stoneman Energy Shelby County Cowlitz Falls Delano Energy E S Joslin Enid Coyote Delaware E W Brown Ennis Power Company LLC Coyote Springs Delaware City Eagle Mountain ENXCO Wind Farm V Coyote Springs II Dell Eagle Point Equilon Los Angeles Refining CR Clearing LLC Delray Eagle Valley Equus Freeport Power Craig Delta Earl F Wisdom Erickson Crane Creek Delta East Bend Escalante Craven County Wood Energy LP Delta Energy Center LLC East Millinocket Mill Escanaba Paper Co Crawford Delta Person LLC East River Essex Crescent Ridge Demoss Petrie Eastlake Etiwanda Cresta Denison Eastman Cogeneration LP Eufaula Dam Crete Energy Park DeRidder Mill Eaton Eurus Combine Hills II LLC Crist Desert Basin Ebensburg Power Co Evander Andrews Criterion Power Partners LLC Desert Sky Wind Farm LP EC&R Panther Cr Wind Farm Evangeline Crockett Cogeneration DeSoto County III
Recommended publications
  • The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy

    The Economic Benefits of Kansas Wind Energy

    THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF KANSAS WIND ENERGY NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Prepared By: Alan Claus Anderson Britton Gibson Polsinelli Shughart, Vice Chair, Polsinelli Shughart, Shareholder, Energy Practice Group Energy Practice Group Scott W. White, Ph.D. Luke Hagedorn Founder, Polsinelli Shughart, Associate, Kansas Energy Information Network Energy Practice Group ABOUT THE AUTHORS Alan Claus Anderson Alan Claus Anderson is a shareholder attorney and the Vice Chair of Polsinelli Shughart's Energy Practice Group. He has extensive experience representing and serving as lead counsel and outside general counsel to public and private domestic and international companies in the energy industry. He was selected for membership in the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators and has led numerous successful oil and gas acquisitions and joint development projects domestically and internationally. Mr. Anderson also represents developers, lenders, investors and suppliers in renewable energy projects throughout the country that represent more than 3,500 MW in wind and solar projects under development and more than $2 billion in wind and solar projects in operation. Mr. Anderson is actively involved in numerous economic development initiatives in the region including serving as the Chair of the Kansas City Area Development Council's Advanced Energy and Manufacturing Advisory Council. He received his undergraduate degree from Washington State University and his law degree from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (913) 234-7464 or by email at [email protected]. Britton Gibson Britton Gibson is a shareholder attorney in Polsinelli Shughart’s Energy Practice Group and has been responsible for more than $6 billion in energy-related transactions.
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File

    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012

    Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012

    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
  • Renewable Energy Guide a Guide for Local Governments

    Renewable Energy Guide a Guide for Local Governments

    s GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE December 2020 Indiana Renewable Energy Guide A Guide for Local Governments This guide was authored by Jenna Greene, Brian Ross, and Jessi Wyatt of the Great Plains Institute in collaboration with the Environmental Resilience Institute at Indiana University. The information and work presented herein was funded in part by Energy Foundation. Photo from Great Plains Institute by Katharine Chute SUMMARY Wind and solar energy are among the least expensive forms of electric generation in the country. Solar and wind resources are abundant throughout Indiana. Costs of both solar and wind energy systems are forecast to continue declining. Increased market activity in renewable energy development will therefore continue well into the future. This guide provides Indiana communities with a long-range perspective on utility- and community-scale solar and wind energy markets and development trends. Understanding the long-term context helps communities make informed decisions in evaluating renewable energy proposals and creating plans about how future development should happen. The Great Plains Institute is engaging local governments across the Upper Midwest on long- term planning for renewable energy. Additional guides are available on the Great Plains Institute website: www.betterenergy.org. SITING UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR AND WIND IN INDIANA 1 SUMMARY OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SITING AUTHORITY Siting authority for solar and wind systems in Indiana resides at the local level.1 Additional permits are granted by state bodies, but these projects are still subject to local land use controls. For example, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission issues a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for large-scale energy facilities, but neither solar nor wind energy systems require a state-level siting permit.2 Zoning and land use standards vary widely across Indiana’s counties.
  • Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
  • January 31, 2019 the Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal

    January 31, 2019 the Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal

    PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 2750 Monroe Boulevard Audubon, PA 19403 Steven R. Pincus Associate General Counsel T: (610) 666-4438 ǀ F: (610) 666-8211 [email protected] January 31, 2019 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E., Room 1A Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Docket No. ER19-925-000 PJM Operating Agreement, Schedule 12 Membership List Amendments PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement, Schedule 17 Amendments Dear Secretary Bose: Pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C § 824d (2006), and Section 35.13 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (the “Commission’s” or “FERC’s”)1 regulations, 18 C.F.R. Part 35, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) submits for filing proposed revisions to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“Operating Agreement”), Schedule 12, and Reliability Assurance Agreement among Load Serving Entities in the PJM Region (“RAA”), Schedule 17, to update these lists to include new members, remove withdrawn members, reflect the signatories to the RAA, and reflect corporate name changes for the fourth quarter of 2018 beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. 1 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning specified in the PJM Operating Agreement, PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, and PJM RAA, as appropriate. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose January 31, 2019 Page 2 I. DESCRIPTION OF FILING A. Revised Operating Agreement, Schedule 12 PJM hereby submits for filing proposed revisions to the Operating Agreement, Schedule 12, which lists all the current PJM Members and includes updates to reflect (1) the addition of new PJM Members; (2) the removal of withdrawn PJM Members;2 and (3) PJM Members’ corporate name changes up to, and including, December 31, 2018.
  • SYSTEMS Giving Wind Direction MAGAZINE

    SYSTEMS Giving Wind Direction MAGAZINE

    WIND SYSTEMS WIND Giving Wind Direction MAGAZINE SYSTEMS Construction • Company Profile: CONSTRUCTION Crane Service, Inc. • UMaine-Led Offshore Wind Project Receives Additional $3.7 Million from DOE » Composite Electroless Nickel Coatings for the Wind Energy Industry Varieties and Performance Advantages page 30 » Condition Monitoring Does DECEMBER 2015 DECEMBER Not Need To Be Overwhelming page 34 DECEMBER 2015 NO ONE UNDERSTANDS THE SUBTLE NUANCES OF WIND ENERGY LIKE WE DO. Whether you’re acquiring, developing, or building and operating wind projects, we can help you achieve success at every stage of the process. See the Droel difference at droellaw.com. HOURS OF DOMINANCE AMSOIL products are installed in more than 10,000 MW class wind turbines in North America. Running more than 7 years strong on our original formula. OUR COMPETITION KNOWS ABOUT AMSOIL. DO YOU? Bringing a better product to the wind market since 2008. Come see why more and more wind farms are switching to AMSOIL. www.amsoilwind.com The AMSOIL Wind Group 715-399-6305 inFOCUS: CONSTRUCTION DECEMBER 2015 16 UMaine-Led Offshore Wind ALSO IN inFOCUS Project Receives Additional $3.7 Million from DOE 22 Profile: Crane Service, Inc. 28 Conversation: 18 Siemens Reduces Transport Costs for Offshore Rob Lee Wind Turbines by Up to 20 Percent Wanzek Construction, Inc. 2 DECEMBER | 2015 inFOCUS: CONSTRUCTION DECEMBER 2015 TORK ELECTRONIC DIGITAL CONTROLLED S O L UTI O N S A V A I L A B L E TORQUE TECHNOLOGY . DIGITAL TORQUE CONTROL THAT WORX FOR YOUR MAINTENANCES The leading electronic torque control system in ERAD electronic torque control sys- All RAD torque guns are designed to the Wind Industry assembled for your WTG.
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
  • Meadow Lake Wind Farm

    Meadow Lake Wind Farm

    Meadow Lake Wind Farm Meadow Lake Wind Farm is located in northwestern Indiana in White County. The site offers many advantages as a location for a modern wind power project, including a strong, proven wind resource, excellent access to a transmission line, compatibility with existing land uses and proximity to power markets. The wind farm co-exists well with the agricultural land use in the area, allowing farmers to continue growing crops while generating revenue from the wind turbines. Energy Output Meadow Lake I Wind Farm has an installed capacity of 199.65 megawatts (MW), Phase II has an installed capacity of 99 MW and Phase III has an installed capacity of 103.5 MW, and Phase IV has an installed capacity of 98.7 MW. The wind farms generate enough clean, renewable energy to power approximately 138,000 average Indiana homes each year. EDP Renewables North America’s Development team is developing additional phases with a potential installed capacity of up to 500 megawatts in White and Benton Counties. Benefits to the Community The four phases of Meadow Lake Wind Farm yield significant economic benefits to the community in the form of payments to landowners, local spending and annual community investment. In addition, the development, construction and operation of the wind farms have generated a significant number of jobs. During construction, more than 1,000 contracters were hired. The wind farm helps provide energy security to the United States by diversifying the electricity generation portfolio, protecting against volatile natural gas spikes and utilizing a renewable, domestic source of energy.
  • Renewable Energy: Wind and Solar

    Renewable Energy: Wind and Solar

    Renewable Energy: Chapter | 19 Wind and Solar ❖ Can Texans harness the wind and sun and even the jobs that go with these energy sources? 600-turbine development across 336,000 Introduction acres of West Texas. Financed by Chinese In late 2009, German utility giant E.ON banks, the development will feature new constructed the world’s largest wind farm in turbines made in China and will bring the tiny West Texas town of Roscoe. The 300 temporary construction jobs and 30 Roscoe wind farm has the capacity to produce permanent jobs to the area. Renewable 781.5 megawatts — enough electricity for energy in Texas is new — and it has already every home in Plano, McKinney and the been globalized. rest of the 265,000 households in Collin These giant wind projects illustrate County. The $1 billion project in Roscoe two key trends: Texas is emerging as took 21 months to complete and employed the capital of renewable energy, and 500 construction workers, who built 627 wind foreign companies are moving fast to take turbines on the fields of 300 property owners advantage. “People in Texas think it has — land that once pumped oil. got to be conventional energy or renewable The wind turbines of West Texas spin at energy. It’s not. It’s both,” said Michael 7 miles per hour. And one turbine produces Webber, an engineering professor at the about as much electricity as 350 households University of Texas at Austin and associate consume in a year. These economics are director of the Center for International attracting more wind turbines to the state, Energy and Environmental Policy.
  • Summary Report of Wind Farm Data September 2008 Yih-Huei Wan

    Summary Report of Wind Farm Data September 2008 Yih-Huei Wan

    Technical Report Summary Report of Wind NREL/TP-500-44348 Farm Data May 2009 September 2008 Yih-huei Wan Technical Report Summary Report of Wind NREL/TP-500-44348 Farm Data May 2009 September 2008 Yih-huei Wan Prepared under Task No. WER8.5001 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O.
  • Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw Askance Nathaniel sometimes paddles any whine misapplies perennially. Lyndon still clangs mother-liquor while eloquent Emile euhemerized that tranquilization. Refined Agustin censors, his leapers stapled revile isometrically. Easements for market value in kansas, energy farm will. Probably choose renewable energy farm is per mw were primarily utilityscale wind farms are agreements being developed a windmill pump installed. Wind-rich states-North Dakota Texas and Kansas-could accomplish this. Nysted offshore farms much is per mw from empirical and kansas to. Installing and Maintaining a secure Wind Electric Energygov. Mw be a pilot agreement between sites that in mw than texas wind farm project uncertainty in efficiency in most per mw. Project various construction is FGE Power's 5004-MW Goodnight Wind Energy farm in Armstrong. Only a pilot? Unfortunately, its prominence often corresponded to its myriad challenges. The supply curves described earlier are based on switch type of transmission and the GIS optimization described here. What is OPC's position transfer the vessel Wind Project 14 A. Power development impacts on electricity market supported by analyzing its name from wind is wind industry would complicate wind. Involving affected remained opposed after random project was communities early is critical to identifying constructed. Mw marena renovables wind turbine setbacks from kathleen sebelius, nyiso system operations will be installed. Be pushed it might have. In AC electricity, the current flows in width direction from zero to a maximum voltage, then back afraid to zero, then sentence a maximum voltage in the plate direction. Kilowatt-hour MW megawatt NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory RPS.