DOCSLIB.ORG

Document.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Investment Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of the property known as Smokey Trail Apartments (510 Smokey Trail Drive) located in Limon, CO (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. However, the Seller makes no representations or warranties herein and the building is being sold in an “as is, where-is” condition. By receipt of this Memorandum, you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit or disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. or seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extracting any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire. Certain documents, including leases and other materials, are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the full agreements. Interested parties are expected to review all such documents independently. Financial projections are provided for reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. and are, therefore, subject to material variation. Additional information and an opportunity to inspect the Property will be made available to qualified prospective purchasers upon request. Each purchase offer is to be based strictly and entirely upon the purchaser’s independent investigation, analysis appraisal and evaluation of facts and circumstances deemed relevant by the purchaser. Neither Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor any of its respective directors, officers or affiliates have made any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Memorandum or any of its contents, and no legal commitment or obligation shall arise by reason of this Memorandum or its contents. This offering is submitted and received with the understanding that all offers for the acquisition of the herein described property will be conducted through Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. The sellers and Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. expressly reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase the Property and/or terminate discussions with any entity at any time with or without notice. If you have no interest in the Property at this time, please return this Offering Memorandum to: Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. 102 N Cascade Ave, Suite 250, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Various construction materials may contain items that have been or The United States Congress has enacted the Americans with Disa- may in the future be determined to be hazardous (toxic) or undesirable bilities Act. Among other things, it is intended to make many busi- Property includes eight and may need to be specifically treated, handled or removed. Real ness establishments equally accessible to persons with a variety of estate agents have no expertise in the detection or correction of haz- disabilities; modifications to real property may be required. Other townhome style ardous or undesirable items. Expert inspections are necessary. Current state and local laws also may mandate changes. The real estate 3 bd/1.5 ba units. or future laws may require cleanup of such materials. It is the respon- brokers in this transaction are not qualified to advise you as to sibility of the buyer to retain qualified experts to detect and correct what, if any, changes may be required now, or in the future. Bid- such matters and to consult with legal counsel of their choice to deter- ders should consult attorneys and qualified design professionals of mine if such materials are present and if so, to determine what, if any- their choice for information regarding these matters. Real estate thing, the buyer needs to do because of the presence of such materials. brokers cannot determine which attorneys or design professionals have the appropriate expertise in this area. Rush Creek Wind Project Table of Contents Minneapolis, MN – (March 8, 2017) – Mortenson, a leading renewable energy SECTION contractor, has been selected to build what PROPERTY OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 1 will be the largest single- phase wind farm ever Property Description built in North America. Quick Facts The 600-megawatt Rush Amenities Creek Wind Project, Area Overview owned and operated by Hub City Xcel Energy, will be Lincoln County Economic Development home to 300 turbines and an 83- m i l e PRICING & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................. 2 transmission near Limon, Property Configuration Colo. Income & Expenses “We are pleased to be Rent & Sale Comparables selected to construct this significant project for Xcel Energy and the state of Colorado. This 5-Year Projections project is another great example of Xcel’s commitment to clean renewable energy.” said Tim Maag, vice president and general manager at Mortenson’s Wind Energy Group. FLOOR PLANS ............................................................................................. 3 Mortenson’s Wind Energy, High Voltage Transmission and Civil groups will deliver full Interior Photos engineering, procurement and construction for Rush Creek. Colorado based turbine One Bedroom Layout manufacturer, Vestas, will provide the 300-V110 2.0MW wind turbines. The engineering Two Bedroom Layouts design will complete April 2017, with construction expected to begin May 2017 and an in- Three Bedroom Layouts service date of October 2018. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 4 The 600-MW Rush Creek Wind Project will be the single largest wind contract executed to date for Mortenson, as well as the largest for the state of Colorado. AERIALS ...................................................................................................... 5 “Mortenson has a long and distinguished history with the construction of major projects in Colorado, from the Stapleton Redevelopment to Denver International Airport hotel and COLORADO LIVING ................................................................................... 6 transit center, to the Alamosa Solar Project. In addition, it has extensive experience in the development of wind projects throughout the U.S.,” said Gerald Kelly, Xcel Energy Project CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM AND DISCLOSURES .............................. 7 manager. “Mortenson also shares Xcel Energy’s commitment to providing a safe and healthy work environment. We look forward to working with Mortenson on our Rush Creek Wind Farm effort.” The wind farm is estimated to contribute 350 jobs to the state during the peak of construction, and when complete will increase Colorado’s wind energy production by more than 20 percent and potentially generate $180 million in landowner lease payments and property tax revenue. Aerial PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Smokey Trail Apartments provides the finest apartment living in Limon, a market with far more apartment demand than supply. The booming renewable energy sector continues to spur high income job growth, fueling further demand for quality housing. Recent exterior upgrades at Smokey Trail include eight new roofs with forty-year shingles, new four-tone exterior paint on all eight buildings and approximately 250 new windows. Unit interiors have seen significant up- grades to further enhance comfortable living in a peaceful apartment community. All units have full kitchens, full-sized washer/dryer hookups, bay windows, deck/patios and much more. Electric and gas are separately metered, allowing units to have their own furnaces and hot water heaters. Low maintenance costs resulting from the substantial interior and exteri- or upgrades are further enhanced by the Town of Limon clearing/maintaining Smokey Trail Drive, the street/cul-de-sac that runs through the complex. PROPERTY QUICK FACTS LOCATION: 510 Smokey Trail Drive, Limon, CO 80828 NUMBER OF UNITS: 38 UNIT SIZE: 641-1,029 SF # of BUILDINGS: 8 STORIES: 2 Limon Heritage Museum BUILDING TYPE: Garden Style Apartments YEAR BUILT: 1992 BUILDING SQ FT: 29,442 SF RENTABLE SQ FT: 29,442 SF SITE SIZE: 2.908 Acres PARKING: 58 Free Surface Spaces Available 1st Inn Gold Limon PROPERTY AMENITIES • Pet Friendly • Deck/Patios • Forced air heating • Wall to Wall Carpet • Cable Ready • Close to shops, restaurants • Ceiling Fans • Washer/Dryer hookups in each unit • Dishwasher • Pet Play Area • Disposals • Storage Units • Stove, Refrigerator • Scenic Views • Newly/Renovated Interior • Bay Windows Property Overview The following information about the City of Limon can be found on the website: www.townoflimon.com AREA OVERVIEW People working together make Limon a special place to live and
Recommended publications
  • Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw

    Kansas Wind Farm Pilot Agreements Per Mw Askance Nathaniel sometimes paddles any whine misapplies perennially. Lyndon still clangs mother-liquor while eloquent Emile euhemerized that tranquilization. Refined Agustin censors, his leapers stapled revile isometrically. Easements for market value in kansas, energy farm will. Probably choose renewable energy farm is per mw were primarily utilityscale wind farms are agreements being developed a windmill pump installed. Wind-rich states-North Dakota Texas and Kansas-could accomplish this. Nysted offshore farms much is per mw from empirical and kansas to. Installing and Maintaining a secure Wind Electric Energygov. Mw be a pilot agreement between sites that in mw than texas wind farm project uncertainty in efficiency in most per mw. Project various construction is FGE Power's 5004-MW Goodnight Wind Energy farm in Armstrong. Only a pilot? Unfortunately, its prominence often corresponded to its myriad challenges. The supply curves described earlier are based on switch type of transmission and the GIS optimization described here. What is OPC's position transfer the vessel Wind Project 14 A. Power development impacts on electricity market supported by analyzing its name from wind is wind industry would complicate wind. Involving affected remained opposed after random project was communities early is critical to identifying constructed. Mw marena renovables wind turbine setbacks from kathleen sebelius, nyiso system operations will be installed. Be pushed it might have. In AC electricity, the current flows in width direction from zero to a maximum voltage, then back afraid to zero, then sentence a maximum voltage in the plate direction. Kilowatt-hour MW megawatt NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory RPS.
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets

    Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets

    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
  • February 27, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING the Honorable Kimberly D

    February 27, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING the Honorable Kimberly D

    1800 Larimer Denver, CO 80202 February 27, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Re: Public Service Company of Colorado Xcel Energy Operating Companies Open Access Transmission Tariff Docket No. ER18-___-000 Terms, Conditions and Rates for Use of Rush Creek Gen-Tie Dear Secretary Bose: Pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824d, part 35 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC” or “Commission”) regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 35.13 (2017), and Order No. 714,1 Xcel Energy Services Inc.,2 on behalf of its utility operating company affiliate Public Service Company of Colorado (“PSCo”),3 submits revisions to the Xcel Energy Operating Companies Open Access Transmission Tariff (“Tariff” or “OATT”).4 PSCo proposes to add new Part VII “Interconnection Service using the PSCo Rush Creek Generator- Tie Line” and Schedule 19 “Rush Creek Gen-Tie Use Charge,” to the Tariff. PSCo proposes these revisions to provide for the rates, terms and conditions for interconnection service over a new radial generation-tie line now being constructed by PSCo, the Rush Creek Generator Tie- Line (“Rush Creek Gen-Tie” or “Gen-Tie”). PSCo respectfully requests that the Commission act 1 Electronic Tariff Filings, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,276 (2008). 2 Xcel Energy Services Inc. (“XES”) is the centralized service company subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. (“Xcel Energy”), a Minnesota corporation and a holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. XES performs a variety of administrative and general services for the utility operating company affiliates within the Xcel Energy Inc.
  • Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado

    Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado

    Enbridge’s economic impact on Colorado Enbridge, a North American energy These activities deliver a variety As the world’s population grows, delivery leader, was established of economic benefits to multiple we’ll need all forms of energy—crude in 1949 and exists to fuel people’s American states—and these aspects oil, natural gas, renewables—to meet quality of life. of our operations also fuel people’s rising global energy demand. As a quality of life, whether they’re: company with both pipelines and wind We move a very large slice of turbines, Enbridge is delivering energy North America’s oil, natural gas and • well-paying jobs in towns and cities; security and driving transformation natural gas liquids, safely and reliably. • tax revenue that can help build toward a lower-carbon economy. We operate North America’s premium schools, hospitals and roads; natural gas transmission franchise, • procurement spending that We’re proud to deliver economic crude oil and liquids pipeline business, stimulates local economies; or benefits in the states where we and natural gas utility business. • grants and volunteer labor for do business. community-strengthening projects. 1 Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Athabasca Fort McMurray Cheecham Kirby Lake Edmonton Hardisty Kerrobert Calgary Vancouver Regina Lethbridge Cromer Seattle Fredericton Rowatt Gretna Halifax Clearbrook Montreal Minot Superior Bualo Edgar Toronto Boston Westover Sarnia Dawn Bualo Energy assets, Casper Stockbridge New York operations and projects Chatham Leidy Guernsey Oakford Channahon Philadelphia Enbridge’s operations, projects, Gurley Toledo and/or asset ownership interests Flanagan Chicago Steckman in Colorado include: • DCP Midstream natural gas gathering Ridge lines and processing facilities in the Salisbury Accident Denver/Fort Collins, Grand Junction and Denver Kit Carson areas.
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry

    The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry

    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
  • Growth of Wind Generation in the Electric Cooperative Community | 2

    Growth of Wind Generation in the Electric Cooperative Community | 2

    Business & Technology Strategies TechSurveillance Growth of Wind Generation in the Electric Cooperative Community BY LAURA MOOREFIELD, MOOREFIELD RESEARCH & CONSULTING, WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DALE BRADSHAW, TECHNICAL EXPERT FOR NRECA JUNE 2017 subject matter experts for questions on this topic Dan Walsh, Manager of Generation, Environment and Carbon Work Group, [email protected] Dale Bradshaw, Technical Expert and Liaison for the Generation, Environment and Carbon Work Group, [email protected] article snapshot: What has changed in the industry? The wind industry is growing rapidly and is the fastest growing renewable in total megawatts installed. Electric cooperatives are on the front lines of this trend with more than 5,400 MW of wind capacity — about 7 percent of total U.S. wind capacity — and continued growth is expected. But the Production Tax Credit (PTC), a federal tax credit that has been a key driver of U.S. wind developments is being phased-out by 2020. What is the impact on cooperatives? Cooperatives that already own and purchase wind energy may be affected by increasing amounts of wind on the grid, but the PTC phase-out could open new opportunities for co-ops to own more wind farms. In fact, with 100 percent debt financing, low cost-for-capital, and the PTC dropping by 20 percent, 2017 may be the year that it becomes more economical for electric cooperatives to finance their own wind farms. The additional PTC decrease in 2018 will favor cooperative-owned wind farms even more. However, as discussed in a previous TechSurveillance article (Variability and Uncertainty in Renewables’ Generation: Creates Operational, Reliability, and Cost Challenges for G&T Cooperatives), the intermittent and non-dispatchable nature of renewables presents operational, reliability, and economic challenges for generation and transmission (G&T) cooperatives requiring development of fossil generation and other options to integrate this lowest-cost renewable generation option.
  • Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay

    Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay

    Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay June 2020 Prepared by: Emma House, Zach Roy, Sarra Sundstrom, Emily Tulsky Office of Economic Innovation and Partnerships (OEIP) Spin-In Team University of Delaware Supervised by: Willett Kempton and Sara Parkison ABOUT THIS PROJECT This project was commissioned and funded as part of the Spin-In program through the University of Delaware. The project was led by Dr. Willett Kempton, who knew of the coming need for offshore wind ports, and thought analysis of specific sites would help industry and investors to evaluate options on the eastern seaboard. The sector is fast growing, with states signing power purchase contracts for offshore wind power warranting investment in infrastructure to support that construction. This report is a feasibility analysis of two sites for an offshore wind marshalling port in the US Northeast. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This assessment was made all the more accurate thanks to the many individuals who were consulted or otherwise contributed to the analyses for this report. Thank you to Jesper Bank of Port of Esbjerg, Tim Kelly from the Army Corps of Engineers, Laura Mensch from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dr. John Madsen of UD, Eric Casey and Gene Bailey from Gulftainer, for their advisement, and to many others who contributed information and advice. Additional thanks to Emily Tino, Renee Hetrick, Christina Clark, Dr. Helen Bowers, Andrew Ames, and Cheryl Honaker for their participation earlier in the project. Thanks for financial and logistical support to the Spin-in program at UD Office of Economic Development and Partnerships, especially to Amalea Rassias, and the OEIP team.
  • Colorado PUC E-Filings System

    Colorado PUC E-Filings System

    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF THE 600 ) MW RUSH CREEK WIND PROJECT ) PURSUANT TO RULE 3660(H), A ) CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ) AND NECESSITY FOR THE RUSH CREEK ) WIND FARM, AND A CERTIFICATE OF ) PROCEEDING NO. 16A-0117E PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY ) FOR THE 345 KV RUSH CREEK TO MISSILE ) SITE GENERATION TIE TRANSMISSION ) LINE AND ASSOCIATED FINDINGS OF ) NOISE AND MAGNETIC FIELD ) REASONABLENESS ) VERIFIED APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF THE 600 MW RUSH CREEK WIND PROJECT PURSUANT TO RULE 3660(H), A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE RUSH CREEK WIND FARM, AND A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE 345 KV RUSH CREEK TO MISSILE SITE GENERATION TIE TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED FINDINGS OF NOISE AND MAGNETIC FIELD REASONABLENESS. In accordance with § 40-5-101 and § 40-2-124, C.R.S., and Rules 3002(a)(III), 3002(b), 3002(c), 3102, 3206, and 3660(h) of the Commission’s Rules Colorado PUC E-Filings System of Practice and Procedure, Public Service Company of Colorado (“Public Service” or the “Company”) hereby requests that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”) authorize it to develop, own and operate as utility rate-based property a new 600 megawatt (“MW”) nameplate capacity wind facility located in eastern Colorado, which is comprised of the Rush Creek I and Rush Creek II sites. In addition, Public Service requests two Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”): (1) a CPCN to construct and operate the Rush Creek I and II wind generation facilities, and (2) a CPCN to construct and operate a 345 kV generation intertie (the “Rush Creek Gen-Tie” or “Gen-Tie”) the Rush Creek generation facilities and Gen-Tie together will be referenced throughout this Application as the “Rush Creek Wind Project” or “Project”.
  • Rush Creek 345 Kv Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Permit Application 1041 Permit-REV03

    Rush Creek 345 Kv Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Permit Application 1041 Permit-REV03

    November 10, 2016 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Permit Application 1041 Permit-REV03 This page intentionally left blank. Public Service Company of Colorado Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Application-REV03 Arapahoe County 1041 Permit Application PREPARED FOR: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS INC. LAKEWOOD, CO Public Service Company of Colorado Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Application-REV03 This page intentionally left blank. Public Service Company of Colorado Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project Arapahoe County 1041 Application-REV03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo or “Applicant”) has prepared this Areas and Activities of State Interest (Colorado House Bill 1041; 1041 Regulations) permit application per the requirements outlined in Chapter 5 of the Regulations Governing Areas and Activities of State Interest in Arapahoe County. This application is organized based on the 2012 Eastern Colorado Connect LLC application per the request of the Arapahoe County Public Works and Development, Planning Division. PSCo is providing Project information, exhibits, and materials, which are hereby incorporated into and made part of the Application below in order to comply with Arapahoe County 1041 Permit approval criteria. PROJECT SUMMARY The Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project is an approximately 80-93 mile long (depending on the preferred alternative) 345 kV transmission line, planned to cross approximately 13.5 miles of eastern Arapahoe County, approximately 41 miles of Elbert County, and 26 miles of Lincoln County as depicted on the map in Figure 2-1 (Arapahoe County – Rush Creek 345 kV Transmission Line Project Map).
  • The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado

    The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado

    The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with reliable consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific activities and model public-private sector relationships. • Real Estate Economics Preparation of strategic market data and analysis for prospective real estate development and public- private partnerships. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
  • Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014

    Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014

    APPLICATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOREIGN-TRADE ZONE FOR TOWN OF LIMON, COLORADO Submitted By: Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014 Grantee Structure and Legal Authority 2. Legal Authority for Application Please see Collective Attachment I, which is comprised of A--copy of the State’s enabling legislation; B—charter or organization papers showing the powers granted to Boards of Trustees and sections that are pertinent to FTZs; and C—certified copy of the Board of Trustees Resolution 3. Discuss the nature of the grantee organization (public or private; non-profit or for-profit). The proposed Grantee is a municipal corporation that has the legal status of a “town” under the laws of Title 31 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Colorado. This governmental entity is a body politic. The Grantee is governed by a mayor and a six member Board of Trustees (the mayor and each Trustee are elected for four year terms) with elections being held every two years by the qualified voters of the Town of Limon. 4. Summarize what you foresee as the operating structure of the zone and discuss the financing plan (as applicable). A summary of the operating structure of the zone and financing plan is: Zone status is being sought under an Alternative Site Framework (ASF) format for some 2,000 acres to be activated in the aggregate. As indicated above, this initial application has identified two sites totaling approximately +- 421.46 acres. The proposed Grantee believes that the flexibility offered by ASF is consistent with the flexibility which it intends to pursue in its development efforts.
  • United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)

    United States Withouth CA Wind Farms with 15 and 20M Agl Wind Speeds (Updated 8.26.20)

    Wind Farms in the United States (excluding California) and Wind Speeds at known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 26 August Contact: Kelsey Wolf-Cloud, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate Note used only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. Total Onshore Total Wind Wind Total Number of Farms in Farms Projected Projected onshore wind farms Country analyzed MW >6.5m/s MW >6.5m/s in country (MWs) (MW) at 15m agl at 20m agl 1,292 104,212 54,627 11,181 22,059 Average Wind Speed Average Average at 20m agl Onshore Wind Farm # of Wind Speed Wind Speed Power (kW) m/s Name Turbines at 80m agl at 15m agl (calculated m/s m/s using wind shear) Foote Creek Rim 82,950 130 12.19 10.93 11.15 Kaheawa II 21,000 14 10.08 8.31 8.58 Rock River 50,000 50 9.7 7.98 8.26 Kaheawa I 30,000 20 9.8 7.97 8.25 Caprock Wind Ranch 80,000 80 9.91 7.7 8.04 Wild Horse 228,600 127 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse 268,200 149 8.9 7.42 7.66 Wild Horse II 39,600 22 8.9 7.42 7.66 Pioneer 85,100 46 8.89 7.36 7.60 High Plains 99,000 66 9.07 7.35 7.63 Red Canyon 84,000 56 9.47 7.34 7.66 Auwahi Wind Farm 24,000 8 9.68 7.27 7.63 Blue Canyon II 151,200 84 9.1 7.23 7.53 Blue Canyon 74,250 45 9.04 7.11 7.40 Seven Mile Hill 118,500 79 9.19 7.06 7.39 Glenrock II 99,000 66 9.08 7.05 7.36 McFadden Ridge 28,500 19 8.67 7.05 7.30 High Lonesome 100,000 40 8.36 7 7.20 Hawai Renewable 10,560 16 9.01 6.91 7.24 Happy