DOCSLIB.ORG

Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014 APPLICATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FOREIGN-TRADE ZONE FOR TOWN OF LIMON, COLORADO Submitted By: Board of Trustees Town of Limon, Colorado July 23, 2014 Grantee Structure and Legal Authority 2. Legal Authority for Application Please see Collective Attachment I, which is comprised of A--copy of the State’s enabling legislation; B—charter or organization papers showing the powers granted to Boards of Trustees and sections that are pertinent to FTZs; and C—certified copy of the Board of Trustees Resolution 3. Discuss the nature of the grantee organization (public or private; non-profit or for-profit). The proposed Grantee is a municipal corporation that has the legal status of a “town” under the laws of Title 31 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Colorado. This governmental entity is a body politic. The Grantee is governed by a mayor and a six member Board of Trustees (the mayor and each Trustee are elected for four year terms) with elections being held every two years by the qualified voters of the Town of Limon. 4. Summarize what you foresee as the operating structure of the zone and discuss the financing plan (as applicable). A summary of the operating structure of the zone and financing plan is: Zone status is being sought under an Alternative Site Framework (ASF) format for some 2,000 acres to be activated in the aggregate. As indicated above, this initial application has identified two sites totaling approximately +- 421.46 acres. The proposed Grantee believes that the flexibility offered by ASF is consistent with the flexibility which it intends to pursue in its development efforts. The first two sites have been identified. The proposed Grantee intends to offer FTZ status to qualified companies interested in benefiting from the program. Each prospective user that meets the qualifications of the zone schedule, upon the establishment of the zone and the development and promulgation of the schedule, will operate independently. The proposed Grantee is committed to this zone project on the basis of each individually activated site being operated by its owner/operator. Each individual user will bear its own financial obligations required to effectively operate its FTZ project. Economic Justification 5. State the community’s1 overall economic and trade-related goals and strategies in relation to those of the region and state, including a reference to the plan or plans on which the goals are based and how they relate to the proposed zone. If you have letters of support from local organizations, please include those letters as an attachment (Attachment II). Limon is known as the “Hub City.” Limon, Colorado is located in the eastern section of Colorado, approximately 70 miles due east of Denver. Limon is located in Lincoln County which, along with the Counties of Cheyenne, Elbert and Kit Carson, is included within the four-county area referred to as the East Central Colorado Region (the Region). For many decades, agriculture has been the main economic activity in Limon, the surrounding East Central Colorado region and eastern Colorado in general. While agriculture continues to be a major economic driver in Limon and Lincoln County, the transportation network is once again a growing economic force in the community. The Town of Limon is currently highly reliant upon the transportation system for its primary source of revenue and jobs. The Town of Limon is home to two (2) major truck stops and twenty (20) hotels and restaurants. Over 1.2 million trucks pass through Limon annually. This translates to average per capita retail sales of $70,000. 1 Note that the economic data that are presented in this and other sections are derived from varying levels—the Town of Limon, Lincoln County, the East Central Region or other designations of the eastern half of Colorado (Eastern High Plains), and the state as a whole. Also note that no data is compiled or available for the geographic area that corresponds exactly to the proposed Service Area. Location Quotients associated with this transportation system include Accommodations and Food Services (2.5), Gas Stations (24.3) and Retail Trade (2.0) also show the economic draw created by the transportation system. Recently the Limon Retail Leakage Study, completed in January 2013 by Colorado State University, Regional Economics Institute made this statement regarding the implications of the current economy: Clearly, Limon’s tax base is largely based on gas station related sales, with the community able to fund much of their government activities through taxes imposed on non-residents. Although this is a popular and effective strategy, it is important to recognize that this ability may be influenced by recent national policy developments. In particular, increased vehicle fuel efficiency standards will likely eventually significantly reduce the overall demand for gasoline. This is especially true if people do not respond to better fuel efficiency by driving more. Thus, Limon’s gas stations may very well see fewer motorists stopping, meaning not only lower fuel sales, but also reduced taxable sales of food, drink and convenience goods. This statement played into the decision of the Town and Lincoln County to work together to diversify the economy by attracting other industry including manufacturing and distribution which will be discussed in Section 5 of this application. During the period 1970-2011, the Region has experienced a population growth of 78.8%. The region is projected to continue moderate growth through 2040 by the Colorado State Demographer, as shown below. x Area resources including port facilities and transportation networks The designation of “Hub City” describes the Town of Limon well. Throughout its history, the economy of Lincoln County has relied upon its transportation system to create and move its economy. Colorado’s Front Range lies along the east slope of the Rocky Mountains and includes the communities from Fort Collins on the north to Pueblo on the south. Colorado’s major population centers are located along the Front Range. Front Range cities such as Denver, Colorado Springs, Aurora, Lakewood, Thornton and Arvada are all within an hour and twenty minute drive from Limon and Lincoln County. The Town of Limon is approximately 60 minutes east of Denver on Interstate 70. Highways traversing Limon are Interstate 70 and U.S. Highways 40/287 and 24. Colorado State Highway 71 bisects Limon north to south connecting to Nebraska and New Mexico. Colorado Highway 86, seven minutes west of Limon connects Interstate 70 to Elizabeth, Franktown, Castle Rock and Interstate 25. Twenty minutes to the south of Limon on Highway 71 is the junction with Colorado State Highway 94, a route into Colorado Springs. U.S. Highway 24 is the major route to Colorado Springs and ultimately connects with the north and south Interstate 25. There are two railroads servicing Limon: Union Pacific and the KYLE Railroad which is part of the Genesee & Wyoming Railroad System. Limon is positioned in the center of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor. This is a federally designated High Priority Corridor on the National Highway System and the State of Colorado’s primary freight corridor. See the map which shows the Ports-to-Plains connections among the seaports and international border crossings served by the Corridor, as well as the locations of FTZs including the proposed site at Limon, Attachment VI. The corridor runs from the Port of Mazatlan in Mexico through Laredo, Eagle Pass or Del Rio, Texas to Canada through Alberta and Saskatchewan. The Colorado highways in the corridor, U.S. Highways 40/287 and I-70, and Colorado State Highway 71, are a direct route from Mexico to Canada creating an international trade corridor through North America’s Energy and Agricultural Heartland. The Limon Municipal Airport is rated a B-1 airport. The runway is 4,700 feet with 24 hour lighting and part-time FBO availability. Denver International Airport is 77 minutes west of Limon and Colorado Springs Airport is 80 minutes to the southwest. x Strengths and weaknesses of the local economy as well as economic imbalances and unemployment rates As indicated above, the Town of Limon is heavily economically dependent upon gas station retail sales. Lincoln County, as a whole, is seeing new economic growth in the area of natural resources. In the past five (5) years, new development of both wind resources and oil and gas development is bringing a new sector to the community. Currently ranking second in the state with installed production capacity of 652 mw, the wind capacity in Lincoln County is second to none. Three projects have been developed, permitted, constructed and producing in the past three years. Renewable Energy Systems developed the Cedar Point Wind Farm with 139 - 1.8 mw Vestas turbines, two onsite project substations, one operations and maintenance building and more than 40 miles of overhead transmission line. The Cedar Point Project is owned by the Canadian company Enbridge under a power agreement with Xcel Energy. The Cedar Point Wind Farm generates 252 megawatts of electricity. NextEra Energy Resources developed the Limon I and Limon II Wind Energy Center which came on line in late 2012. The 400 mw facility is comprised of twin 200-MW projects and 125 GE 1.6 MW wind turbines. Located on more than 55,000 acres, a 45- mile long, 345 kV transmission line connects the wind farms to the substation. Both these projects also operate under a power agreement with Xcel Energy. Limon III Wind Energy Center is currently being constructed with production scheduled to begin in 2014. This will add an additional 200 MW bringing Lincoln County to 852 MW of installed capacity. Since 2008, there has been more oil development than at anytime in Lincoln County’s history.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Document.Pdf
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Investment Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of the property known as Smokey Trail Apartments (510 Smokey Trail Drive) located in Limon, CO (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. However, the Seller makes no representations or warranties herein and the building is being sold in an “as is, where-is” condition. By receipt of this Memorandum, you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit or disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. or seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extracting any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire. Certain documents, including leases and other materials, are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the full agreements. Interested parties are expected to review all such documents independently. Financial projections are provided for reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado
    Enbridge’s economic impact on Colorado Enbridge, a North American energy These activities deliver a variety As the world’s population grows, delivery leader, was established of economic benefits to multiple we’ll need all forms of energy—crude in 1949 and exists to fuel people’s American states—and these aspects oil, natural gas, renewables—to meet quality of life. of our operations also fuel people’s rising global energy demand. As a quality of life, whether they’re: company with both pipelines and wind We move a very large slice of turbines, Enbridge is delivering energy North America’s oil, natural gas and • well-paying jobs in towns and cities; security and driving transformation natural gas liquids, safely and reliably. • tax revenue that can help build toward a lower-carbon economy. We operate North America’s premium schools, hospitals and roads; natural gas transmission franchise, • procurement spending that We’re proud to deliver economic crude oil and liquids pipeline business, stimulates local economies; or benefits in the states where we and natural gas utility business. • grants and volunteer labor for do business. community-strengthening projects. 1 Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Athabasca Fort McMurray Cheecham Kirby Lake Edmonton Hardisty Kerrobert Calgary Vancouver Regina Lethbridge Cromer Seattle Fredericton Rowatt Gretna Halifax Clearbrook Montreal Minot Superior Bualo Edgar Toronto Boston Westover Sarnia Dawn Bualo Energy assets, Casper Stockbridge New York operations and projects Chatham Leidy Guernsey Oakford Channahon Philadelphia Enbridge’s operations, projects, Gurley Toledo and/or asset ownership interests Flanagan Chicago Steckman in Colorado include: • DCP Midstream natural gas gathering Ridge lines and processing facilities in the Salisbury Accident Denver/Fort Collins, Grand Junction and Denver Kit Carson areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Colorado's Wind Industry
    WINDS OF CHANGE The economic impact of Colorado’s wind industry — and how to keep it growing Photos courtesy of NREL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT E2 Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and its partner E2 is a national, nonpartisan group of business leaders, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) would investors and others who promote smart environmental like to thank all of the fi rms and individuals who policies that drive economic growth. E2 members, provided time and insights on their wind energy- active in nearly every state in the country, have built or related activities in Colorado. fi nanced more than 1,700 companies that have created more than 570,000 jobs, and manage more than $100 In particular, we would like to thank Walter billion in venture and private equity capital. Our Rocky Christmas, Chris Oberle, Auston Van Slyke, and Mountains Chapter was founded in 2007 and has Chris Gorrie of Ecotech Institute; Michael Rucker grown to more than 75 members. E2 is an affi liate of of Harvest Energy Services; Craig Walker of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Learn more at Walker Component Group; Piper Baron of Vestas; www.e2.org or follow us on Twitter at @e2org. David Glickson of NREL, and Christian Hertneky for their time and contributions to the company profi les featured in this report. We would also like to thank Tom Darin of AWEA and Sarah Cottrell Propst of Interwest Energy Alliance for their insights and advice shaping this report. DISCLAIMER Report Authored by Susan Nedell, E2 The inclusion of any company within this document Jeff Benzak, E2 is not a statement of support by those companies Bob Keefe, E2 for any of the policy recommendations contained Lauren Kubiak, NRDC herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay
    Feasibility Assessment for an Offshore Wind Marshalling Port in the Delaware Bay June 2020 Prepared by: Emma House, Zach Roy, Sarra Sundstrom, Emily Tulsky Office of Economic Innovation and Partnerships (OEIP) Spin-In Team University of Delaware Supervised by: Willett Kempton and Sara Parkison ABOUT THIS PROJECT This project was commissioned and funded as part of the Spin-In program through the University of Delaware. The project was led by Dr. Willett Kempton, who knew of the coming need for offshore wind ports, and thought analysis of specific sites would help industry and investors to evaluate options on the eastern seaboard. The sector is fast growing, with states signing power purchase contracts for offshore wind power warranting investment in infrastructure to support that construction. This report is a feasibility analysis of two sites for an offshore wind marshalling port in the US Northeast. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This assessment was made all the more accurate thanks to the many individuals who were consulted or otherwise contributed to the analyses for this report. Thank you to Jesper Bank of Port of Esbjerg, Tim Kelly from the Army Corps of Engineers, Laura Mensch from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dr. John Madsen of UD, Eric Casey and Gene Bailey from Gulftainer, for their advisement, and to many others who contributed information and advice. Additional thanks to Emily Tino, Renee Hetrick, Christina Clark, Dr. Helen Bowers, Andrew Ames, and Cheryl Honaker for their participation earlier in the project. Thanks for financial and logistical support to the Spin-in program at UD Office of Economic Development and Partnerships, especially to Amalea Rassias, and the OEIP team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado
    The Benefits of the Renewable Energy Industry in Eastern Colorado Prepared for: Prepared By: Development Research Partners specializes in economic research and analysis for local and state government and private sector businesses. Founded in 1994, Development Research Partners combines extensive experience in real estate economics and economic development to provide clients with reliable consulting services in four areas of expertise: • Economic and Demographic Research Research in support of business and community activities, ranging from community profiles to evaluating and forecasting economic and market conditions. • Industry Studies Specialized research projects including industry cluster research, industry trends analysis, and strategic competitive analysis. • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Comprehensive analysis and analytical tools to evaluate and forecast site-specific activities and model public-private sector relationships. • Real Estate Economics Preparation of strategic market data and analysis for prospective real estate development and public- private partnerships. Patricia Silverstein, President & Chief Economist David Hansen, Senior Economist 10184 West Belleview Avenue, Suite 100 Littleton, Colorado 80127 www.DevelopmentResearch.net 303.991.0070 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Area for Consideration for the Potential Locating of Offshore Wind Energy Areas TABLE of CONTENTS
    New York State Area for Consideration for the Potential Locating of Offshore Wind Energy Areas TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures . 2 List of Tables . 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations . 3 Executive Summary . 5 1.0 Introduction . 7 1 1 . Overview . 7 1 .2 New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan . 8 1 .3 Public Policy Context . 10 1 .4 Request for Wind Energy Areas . 10 2.0 Area for Consideration . 11 2 1. Area for Consideration for BOEM's Area Identification Process and the Locating of New Wind Energy Areas . 11 2 .2 Area for Consideration Selection Process . 12 3.0 Indicative Wind Energy Areas .. 18 4.0 General Schedule of Proposed Activities . 24 5.0 General Description of Objectives and Facilities . 27 5 1 . Objectives . 27 5 .2 Offshore Production Facilities and Substations . 27 5 .3 Power Transmission and Grid Connection . 29 5 .4 Onshore Support Facilities and Staging Areas . 30 This document is the result of work undertaken by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), the New York Department of State (DOS), and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) . The Area for Consideration presented in this document fulfills one of the key goals of the New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan . The New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan, which will be completed by the end of 2017, is a joint effort between NYSERDA, DOS, DEC, the New York State Department of Labor, the New York State Department of Public Service, Empire State Development, Long Island Power Authority, New York Power Authority, and Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation .
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Projects
    Renewable energy projects Project Name Project Description Oxley Wind Farm 3 turbines with total generation capacity of 6.15 MW Kingston Gardiner TS Odessa Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 116 acres SunE Newsboro 4 Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 247 acres RE Midhurst 3 3.5 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 32 acres Kawartha Biogas 9.8 MW biogas energy plant that will process organic material which will generate electricity and heat. Almonte Solar Farm 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 80 acres Elgin Grovlea Farms Inc's Wind Farm 2 turbine with total generation capactiy of 0.032 MW Alfred Solar Energy Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 160 acres Penn Energy - Van Dorp Solar Projects 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 138 acres Cochrane Solar Farm (Formerly Abitibi, Empire and 30 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 745 acres Martin's Meadow) Gesner Wind Energy Project 5 turbines with total generation capacity of 10 MW GoldLight Solar Project 10 MW solar project. Site consists of approximately 94 acres Springwood Wind Farm Project 4 turbines with total generation capacity of Page 1 of 84 09/29/2021 Renewable energy projects Project Type MOE Approval Number Wind 3780-96UL7S Solar 2294-8WJHD3 Solar Solar 5189-8SJNRC Bioenergy 4765-92MKCJ Solar 0112-94VKPR Wind 9716-8AVFSQ Solar 0578-8XGMUG Solar Solar 1290-9A4KSE Wind 3069-8NQQC7 Solar 0494-99WL4Q Wind 7563-8WYHXG Page 2 of 84 09/29/2021 Renewable energy projects Project Approval Type Proponent Name REA Oxley Wind Farm REA 2225054 Ontario Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION WHITE PAPER Authored By: Brandon W
    Credit: MHI Vestas Offshore Wind THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION WHITE PAPER Authored by: Brandon W. Burke (Business Network for Offshore Wind) Michael Goggin and Rob Gramlich (Grid Strategies LLC) October 2020 Credit: MHI Vestas Offshore Wind Foreword The Business Network for Offshore Wind (Network) is the only 501(c)(3) nonprofit organiza- tion exclusively devoted to developing the U.S. offshore wind industry and supply chain. As a result, the Network is uniquely positioned to speak with one leading voice for the U.S. offshore wind business community. A key objective of many state-level OSW programs, and a central tenet of the Network’s mis- sion, is to attract investment in U.S.-based OSW manufacturing facilities and related services. To realize this opportunity, investors and OSW developers must see a steady, predictable, and sustainable pipeline of OSW projects taking shape in the U.S. When the capacity of the existing onshore electricity grid is reached, and low-cost points of interconnection have been utilized, these grid/interconnection constraints could arrest the future growth of the U.S. OSW project pipeline. The objective of this white paper is to outline grid and transmission recommendations to in- form grid operators and U.S. policymakers in the many local, state, and federal regulatory bod- ies that possess some degree of regulatory responsibility for U.S. offshore wind development and electric transmission. A comprehensive document of this kind has not previously been produced, and it is incumbent upon the U.S. OSW industry to provide input and fill the gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadwind Energy, Inc. Amassing Wind Information Deepwater Wind
    MAY 2011 FEATURES AWEA WindPoWER SHoW iSSUE Company Profile: Broadwind Energy, Inc. Amassing Wind Information Deepwater Wind Developments Best Practices for Turbine Manufacturers Building a Better Bearing The Cedar Point Case Study Superconductors on the High Seas PREdiCTivE MAinTEnAnCE StrategiES Departments Construction—Mortenson Construction Maintenance—Rev1 Renewables Technology—Penn State Wind Energy Logistics—Professional Logistics Group Q&A: Terry Humphrey Castrol Industrial MaY 2011 FEATURES COMPANYPROFILE 22 BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. BY RUSS WILLCUTT With expertise in manufacturing gears and towers—and providing crucial blade, gearbox, and O&M services—this company is poised to help carry the wind industry forward. AMASSING WIND INFORMatiON BY LEE ALNES 24 Wind is a variable resource, but not an indecipherable one. Second Wind encourages harnessing the full range of wind sensing technologies available today. PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE 32 StrateGIES BY MIKE MOORE Following predictive maintenance strategies implemented by the industrial sector will increase reliability throughout your turbine system. Shermco Industries provides details. DEEPWater WIND 42 DEVELOPMENTS BY DAVID SOMERVILLE With the development of technologies such as Distributed Buoyancy Modules, Trelleborg Offshore is expanding the reach of deepwater wind development. BEST PRACTICES FOR TURBINE 50 MANufaCTURERS BY DAVE SCHAETZ AND STEVE LUDWIG The experts at Rockwell Automation have developed six principles for building cost-effective wind turbine generators in new markets, which they share with you here. BUILDING A BETTER BEARING BY GARY L. DOLL, PH.D. 58 Wind turbine main shaft and gearbox bearings may experience a variety of life-shortening situations. Timken’s “total system” approach offers real solutions. THE CEDAR POINT CASE STUDY BY KAILEY LORD 70 Reporting from the front lines, RES Americas provides a study of its first wind energy purchase from a facility constructed in Colorado with wind turbines manufactured there as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Creek Wind Farm
    Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm Jeremy Stefek,1 Anna Kaelin,1 Suzanne Tegen,2 Owen Roberts,1 and David Keyser1 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Colorado State University NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73659 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm Jeremy Stefek,1 Anna Kaelin,1 Suzanne Tegen,2 Owen Roberts,1 and David Keyser1 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Colorado State University Suggested Citation Stefek, Jeremy, Anna Kaelin, Suzanne Tegen, Owen Roberts, and David Keyser. 2019. Economic Impacts from Wind Energy in Colorado Case Study: Rush Creek Wind Farm. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-73659. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73659.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73659 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Project Listing – March 20, 2014 Green Has Their
    Renewable Energy Project Listing – March 20, 2014 Green has their Renewable Energy Approval Yellow is Under Technical Review Red are Returned/Incomplete/Withdrawn Blue are received and being screened for completeness Note: projects not listed here have not submitted an REA application Type County, District or Region Project Information Status Wind Huron County Name: Westerhout Enterprises Wind Facility Proponent: Westerhout Enterprises REA Application Status: Approved Wind Huron County Name: Westerhout Poultry Inc. Wind Facility Proponent: Westerhout Poultry REA Application Status: Approved Wind Chatham-Kent County Name: Kent Breeze Corp. Wind Farms Proponent: Kent Breeze Corp. REA Application Status: Approved Wind Wellington County Name: Ryerson University Wind Facility Proponent: Ryerson University REA Application Status: Approved Wind Elgin County Name: Elgin Grovlea Farms Inc's Wind Farm Proponent: Elgin Grovelea Farms REA Application Status: Approved Wind Halton Region Name: Wal-Mart Canada Corp. Wind Turbine Proponent: Wal-Mart Canada REA Application Status: Approved Wind Lambton County Name: Zephyr Farms Limited's Brooke-Alvinston Wind Farm Proponent: Zephyr Farms Limited REA Application Status: Approved Wind Hamilton Name: Mohawk College's Fennell Campus Wind Project Proponent: Mohawk College REA Application Status: Approved Wind Wellington County Name: Conestogo Wind Energy Centre Proponent: NextEra Energy Canada REA Application Status: Approved Wind Chatham-Kent County Name: Gesner Wind Energy Project Proponent: Saturn Power
    [Show full text]